TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

pippisyk Archive

View 0 posts and 147 comments by pippisyk on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
264

Very much this. My grandfather at 90 years old was dressed and groomed by 6am daily. Could cook, clean, fix, etc. And still let my grandmother sleep in every day and brought her breakfast in bed. This ain’t nothing to do with age. He’s just gross.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy16/02/21 05:12 PM
106

It always confused the hell out of me why so many of my friends would date lvm or stay with lvm...just, why? You’re worth so much more than that. So happy my mother raised me right and my father is a hvm. Just sets you for life with complete revulsion towards lvm.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy23/12/20 04:11 PM
6

I'm part Armenian and female. I also am not a "visible minority". Misandry has nothing to do with why we "west Asians" (as they are calling us) get screwed on the whole visible minority thing. Assign blame where it is actually due.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 09:07 PM
0

But that is the point isn't it? The obvious comparison to a man pulling out his penis is a woman pulling out her vagina. Displaying breasts is NOT a big deal and not a statement in the manner that pulling out a sexual organ is (and frankly not a single women in the photo had their breasts out). Context is important. A penis is used for 2 things: making le babies, making le peepee. A vagina is used for making le babies & le peepee (let's lump periods under le babies). A breast is used to feed bab…
/r/MensRights26/10/12 08:06 PM
0

And I disagree. I do NOT think puling out a sexual organ is the same as women showing breasts. Breasts that can be seen anywhere in society in a baby's mouth. In fact, where I live, it is completely legal for a woman to walk around topless. Saying that a sexual organ and a breast are in any way similar is wrong. Breasts are sexualized (shit man, some people sexualize feet and armpits), but they are not sexual organs.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 07:44 PM
2

A) Point out where I said you said they were please? B) You did say "While you might say that that's completely different than showing one's genitals..." I was simply addressing that there is no room for "while you might's, etc" Breasts are not genitals. The only correct comparison would be if a woman went to a male-rape focused rally where potentially many participants had been raped by women, and whipped out her vagina. penis=/=boobie vagina=/=boobie genital=/=boobie boobie=boobie.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 07:25 PM
1

Breasts are not genitals.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 07:13 PM
-2

It is not a good comparison for a variety of reasons. I never once suggested that I felt the OP was actually advocating it. Check your own comprehension skills. It is a poorly thought out comparison, and frankly, it makes you all seem like violent idiots. Why not just argue against MGM using facts instead of bad hyperbole?
/r/MensRights26/09/12 06:04 PM
-2

Good luck with life.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 04:58 PM
-4

A quick review of your 1 month history shows that most ppl in this forum think you are a misogynist and counter-productive to the cause you claim to support. I am inclined to agree. Furthermore, when someone has a differing opinion from you it does not mean they are trolling. It means they have a different opinion than you. And finally, pro-life tip: part of supporting a movement means evaluating the arguments and calling bullshit when you see it, encouraging reasoned debate, and ignoring people…
/r/MensRights26/09/12 04:45 PM
-8

Wow, you used fuck or fucking 9 times. Very mature. Totally makes me want to have a reasoned debate with you. Also, "rabid" not "rabbid". Oh, and no one is debating the attempt at satire, it just wasn't intelligent or effective. Very much like your own "argument".
/r/MensRights26/09/12 04:34 PM
-9

Stooping to name calling? Very productive. I was arguing that the argument made was neither: cogent, or effective. Then I suggested that it painted you all in a bad light. Thanks for proving that one.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 04:24 PM
-7

I agree with you, all I'm saying is, this does not come across as a legitimate argument, and further entrenches the impression that MRAs are misogynists. There are far more effective, and more cogent arguments than "hey let's slice off baby tits"... edit: the poster also said "women's breasts", I chose to assume that he meant babies, and wasn't actually advocating slicing off women's breasts...which again, entrenches the idea that MRAs are misogynists. 30 upvotes on his post is...disconcerting.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 04:11 PM
-13

a) babies don't have breasts b) breastfeeding, transferring antibodies, etc c) doesn't actually prevent breast cancer (which can appear in underarm tissue as well, AND men can get it as well) d) Why do you want to take a legitimate issue like cutting babies genitals without consent and turn it into a hyperbolic, misogynistic, aggressive joke? Want to make your cause look like it's being run by crazy woman-haters? Good jorb.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 03:24 PM
6

Actually, it's a much better example of victim-blaming. The whole "you should have known better/ why did you put yourself in that situation/ etc" thing.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 08:55 PM
2

From your own linked video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQ2xrnyH2wQ&feature=youtu.be&t=7m16s Not too supportive. But I digress. Yes, obviously there are physical differences in male and female brains, you can see it on FMRI scans, and you can also clearly see physical evidence of a male brain in a female body (or the reverse) in FMRI scans on transgendered patients. HOWEVER, just because our ancestors (and I mean everything from your grandfather to australopithecus) had defined gender roles s…
/r/MensRights14/09/12 06:44 PM
3

What are you basing these opinions on? Are you a trained scientist with peer-evaluated and published studies in any of the following fields?: biology, sociology, anthropology... Not trying to be a jerk, but our society enforces traditional gender roles from infancy, starting with colour coded blankets in the hospital. While you may "feel" that vagina=nurturing and penis=competitive, it is almost impossible to evaluate that without cultural bias. In the meantime, it's a better idea to let people …
/r/MensRights14/09/12 06:06 PM
5

So any man who wants to stay home and take care of his kids is unnatural, right? /s These sweeping generalizations are insulting to both sexes. Way to devalue the individual. Now, if you'll excuse me I'll get back to breastfeeding the neighbourhood stray cats and hobos. Just can't seem to fight this urge to nurture and care! /S
/r/MensRights14/09/12 05:24 PM
13

Or, I don't know, from birth girls are taught to aspire to be caregivers, and boys are taught to be competitive. No, you're right. Vagina. No science or reflection needed. /s
/r/MensRights14/09/12 03:57 PM
-2

Oh I read your post, including your "sources" which described men and women as Martians and Venusians (respectfully). So you must understand that I think your grasp of neural science is limited at best. The physical differences between male and female brains are a fact. However, to make blanket statements like yours is insulting and woefully inaccurate: For example, psychologically speaking, men are better at mental 3D rendering than women which makes men better at things like engineering, mecha…
/r/MensRights12/09/12 02:02 PM
-5

Uh huh. Despite having a female brain I am quite capable of working Google. Tell me, do you actually talk to women? Are you friends with any? IF you are (and that is a big if) go tell them, that based on your vast experience on Google and Wikipedia, their brains are inferior and incapable of spatial logic and math, because vagina. And when you're out and about doing that, you can get them jobs as secretaries at all your male friends' offices, where they are undoubtedly scientists in the field of…
/r/MensRights12/09/12 03:11 AM
-7

Because, OP stated: "...For example, psychologically speaking, men are better at mental 3D rendering than women which makes men better at things like engineering, mechanics, etc. Women are, again psychologically speaking, better at interpersonal relationships making them better at things like Administrative Assistance (being PC on that one annoys me), childcare workers, etc." Which is a gross generalization, insulting to both genders, and sexist (again, to both genders). No idea what your cousin…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 09:25 PM
-8

So you get to be an engineer and I get to be a secretary? Because vagina? Sounds like you could actually benefit from a women's studies class.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 09:12 PM
1

To be fair, they at least name the athletes and show their faces...Personally I think turning athletes into sexual objects is inappropriate (c'mon folks, we can do that in our heads, silently & respectfully), but the cropping of the female olympian beach volleyball players is just tasteless. Always just the shot of an ass with the caption "unidentified female player". Sad.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 02:33 PM
1

Yes. The music was pornographic. That is why it is insulting. And yes, you're right. A blog = Cosmo. /sarcasm. If you can't look at the photo essay and agree that chopping off an athlete's head and reducing them to a crotch isn't insulting and sexually objectifying them, then you are an idiot who just wants to argue.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 02:08 PM
1

Almost all min wage jobs have ridiculous dress codes, on top of being shitty min wage jobs...that's why they are notorious for being the bottom of the barrel/last resort of employment. This is not an issue unique to men.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 05:52 PM
1

here and this illustrates the problem pretty well If we are all against this kind of trashy, insulting, uninvited sexualization then it should be called out for both male and female athletes.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 03:01 PM
1

Ok, so where are the posts complaining about the beach volleyball shots of women's asses? No insult intended, but if we are working towards equality, then the beach volleyball photos should be just as insulting as the link above...but I see no complaints here... These people are incredible athletes, it's just sad that the press wants to reduce all their training and ability to a bulge in a speedo, or an ass...
/r/MensRights09/08/12 02:50 PM
1

you aren't responding to my questions, or to reason...so my interest will end here.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 06:47 PM
1

Have you ever slept with a girl who has lied about being on birth control? How about you learn to do what most girls HAVE to do, and protect yourself by using contraception. Pregnancy prevention aside, condoms are the the only thing to protect against STDs and STIs.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 05:17 PM
1

no. because this is not a bank, it's a penis and a vagina. And you can choose to wear a condom, and have a 98% of NOT getting pregnant.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 03:03 PM
1

put a condom on your dick, or get used to having unwanted pregnancies. It's pretty simple. Bye bye troll.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 08:58 PM
-1

I never said he couldn't. Whether that is an ethical choice is up to the individuals involved.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 08:47 PM
2

first link says the pull out method = 27% pregnancy, 2nd link says 18%. None of those links claim it is better than condoms. Check, and mate.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 08:34 PM
-1

no it isn't the same argument. A more accurate comparison would be that women can use the pill, or female condoms, or a diaphragm, etc... A condom is PREVENTATIVE. An abortion is not preventative, it is a response.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 05:47 PM
-1

Yes, I agree that the legal framework is not always fair. But there are a lot of ppl on this thread suggesting that telling a guy to pick his partners with forethought and wear a condom is equivalent to banning access to abortion...dafuq? what meant when i said "...grow together, or..." was that if you pick partners who are smart and respectful you will either want to be with them (through an unplanned pregnancy) OR that you will, as adults, be able to discuss and follow through with the options…
/r/MensRights16/07/12 05:21 PM
1

Biology is not equal. If a woman gets pregnant (by accident, by rape, or by choice) she has the right to bodily autonomy. There is no equivalent legal position for a male, because there is no BIOLOGICAL equivalent. Just because our legal framework for child support is often unfair towards men (and that should corrected, imo) doesn't mean the response is to strip women of the right to bodily autonomy. It cheapens your argument and paints you as someone looking to turn back the clock and put women…
/r/MensRights16/07/12 05:11 PM
1

I am not going get drawn into an abortion debate. It has been done. The general agreement that society has come to is that the woman has bodily autonomy until the fetus is viable outside the womb, barring medical necessity. Once the fetus is viable without CONTINUOUS LIFE SUPPORT FROM THE MOTHER, it now has bodily autonomy. Sorry, but a cluster of 100 cells is not equivalent to a living person. End of discussion.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 04:59 PM
1

That is a flat out lie. Cite your sources. Here are some of mine: *http://www.advocatesforyouth.org/publications/416 *http://www.americanpregnancy.org/preventingpregnancy/malecondom.html *http://www.thebody.com/content/art2436.html *http://www.cdc.gov/condomeffectiveness/latex.htm *http://www.contraceptivetechnology.org/table.html
/r/MensRights16/07/12 04:49 PM
0

Your response is attempting to draw a correlation where there isn't one. It also opens up a debate about bodily autonomy, which frankly, has been answered in this forum and in the rest of the western world. Choosing to put a condom on your dick, and forcing someone to grow a fetus for 9months + go through childbirth + any associated health risks is not comparable. Examining where the rights of fathers are reduced is an admirable goal, but trying to put together a bullshit argument of the respons…
/r/MensRights16/07/12 04:34 PM
-2

No, that comparison is weak at best. Go back to the 50s.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 04:24 PM
-2

There will always be SOME element of the unknown in a relationship. Some small percentage of risk in having sex. BUT, guys in /mr seem talk like EVERY woman is secretly plotting to impregnate themselves with used condoms just to steal their money via child support...that be crazy y'all. Are there woman who would do this? Yup. But they would do it because they are a terrible person. They are the exception to the rule, NOT the norm. This is total paranoia. If you have a solid long term relationshi…
/r/MensRights16/07/12 02:55 PM
-3

Use a condom. Use spermicidal lube. Don't sleep with people you don't trust. Sleep with people you have a good relationship with...
/r/MensRights16/07/12 02:42 PM
0

But if you have reason to not trust the girl, or if this is something that worries you, why don't you just wear a condom? Take some responsibility...
/r/MensRights16/07/12 02:28 PM
1

Grow up. You want debate? Fine. You want to literally act like a child? Fuck off.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 04:24 PM
1

I have a vagina. Therefore I AM an expert in having a vagina. You have a penis (I assume), therefore you are an expert in HAVING A PENIS. Unlike you: I would not be so arrogant as to make claims about what the opposite gender's genitals needs and doesn't need to feel good. I am also not a classless mouth-breather like you, who thinks it's perfectly ok to refer to the opposite sex's genitals in a vulgar and insulting way. You want respect? You want to be listened to? Don't act like a 15yr old who…
/r/MensRights09/07/12 04:02 PM
0

Do you have a vagina? If not, you do not know what you are talking about.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 02:29 PM
4

Don't worry, I don't think she's got an drop of interest in you.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 11:01 PM
-1

fyi, the need for lube has nothing to do with having a foreskin or not...
/r/MensRights06/07/12 06:02 PM
10

So, take the initiative and start trying to set them up.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 02:20 PM
2

...I don't even...
/r/MensRights04/07/12 10:04 PM
-1

Maybe you should use condoms and just not sleep with horrible people? This forum makes it sound like ALL women are monsters. Thanks for insulting my entire gender but flipping out if a women makes sweeping generalizations about males... Why is it so hard to understand that SOME MEN and SOME WOMEN are just assholes that should be avoided and DO NOT REPRESENT THEIR ENTIRE GENDER?
/r/MensRights04/07/12 05:04 PM
1

Highfive for being a person who judges people on their individual merits. If we can get the rest of the world onto this, things would be a lot better. :)
/r/MensRights29/06/12 09:53 PM
0

again, assholes who happen to have vaginas=/=feminists or women in general.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 09:33 PM
-2

Since the post was in response to a comment about women's shelters, etc, I think it's safe to assume that the "feminist enterprise" was run by/for ppl with lady bits. If I somehow misinterpreted, I apologize.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 09:20 PM
3

Good points in there. Thank you for engaging. I think a big BIG change that would make the MRM more legitimate is differentiating between: women who happen to be complete assholes (making false rape claims, lying for custody, etc) women who are extremist feminists (just as bad as misogynists), women who are confused by the concept of MRM & feel scared because it DOES kind of come across like the evil rise of the patriarchy (it isn't I know, BUT to someone totally on the outside who hears "mens r…
/r/MensRights29/06/12 09:09 PM
-5

Are you implying that I do not have "normal social awareness" because I took offense to someone labeling my gender as complicit (and/or active) in a secret pact of oppression? I think a few minutes in this forum will show that men (rightly so) get offended when the same is done to them... Reasoned debate is good. Hyperbole and insult, not so much.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 08:44 PM
1

tbh, I agree with you. I am a woman, and I am no feminist. I believe in equality. But the ppl in MR often have a LOT of difficulty separating woman from feminist. I can tell you that as a woman (not a feminist) I find a lot of comments in this forum and in the MRM extremely disturbing and upsetting. Why that is? Well, a variety of reasons. MR's acts (warning, speaking generally) as though there is no sexism towards woman, and in fact that women are all-powerful oppressive monsters. The reality i…
/r/MensRights29/06/12 08:33 PM
-57

Yes because the "feminist enterprise" is real, and everyone with a vagina gets a free membership at birth. Jesus fucking christ, take this paranoid insanity elsewhere. This is on par with the lunacy of the elders of zion. You want MRA to be listened to? Stop claiming there is a "feminist enterprise" and other such insane drivel.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 08:12 PM
1

See, when I chose to NOT mention gender, it was because GENDER DOESN'T MATTER in this situation. My point being that ANY victim of assault should not be forced to pay their attacker. I was calling into question the OP's suggestion that this was in some way invalidated because the victim in question happened to be a woman. But when you choose to call me a "dumbfuck" for suggesting that people of ANY gender are entitled to protection from financially supporting their attacker (be they male or fema…
/r/MensRights29/05/12 08:43 PM
3

Not enough info in the article to confirm, but they mentioned a string of assaults over several years...I'm assuming there are police reports to back that up. If that is the case, it would establish a history that makes a "consensual rape fantasy" less likely than a sexual assault.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 09:36 PM
-12

...are you saying that a victim of sexual assault should be forced to pay their attacker? Or is that only morally reprehensible when it suits your worldview?
/r/MensRights28/05/12 08:56 PM
2

You've "given me a warning"? How kind. I can't tell if you are threatening me, or if your ego is just overinflated. I can't explain grammar and syntax to you. Go to school, educate yourself.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 03:01 PM
2

Sarcasm.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 03:40 PM
1

Tone.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 09:49 PM
1

Because it's a question. Not a statement.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 05:51 PM
1

you have misquoted me, ignoring the fact that i asked you a question. Your "quote" should be written as: "...you believe that men are all on the verge of raping people, and all that is needed is a short skirt?" Which acknowledges that you have removed part of my wording.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 04:24 PM
1

You said: "Would you quote where I said that?"
/r/MensRights04/05/12 03:43 PM
1

This was a reasoned response. Your antagonistic tone is mostly gone. Well done. Now we can agree that cutting the genitals of babies is wrong. The End.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 10:03 PM
1

Wow, that's actually a very good breakdown of what you've done. Acceptance is the first step on the road to recovery! clap clap
/r/MensRights03/05/12 08:49 PM
1

Don't paraphrase me and put tone and falsities that I did not say in my mouth. Grow a backbone and quote me accurately, with quotation marks. Let me paraphrase you: I am blinded with my sexist upbringing and can't see an ally against circumcision when I see one. In fact, I don't really give a rats ass about stopping MGM, it's much more fun to stroke my throat beard and hurl outrageous insults like pippisyk has a sexual relationship with the WHO. I am sooooo stupid. Gotta love that paraphrasing, …
/r/MensRights03/05/12 08:38 PM
1

It's sad that you have to resort to name calling to make yourself feel good.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 07:26 PM
1

because a clitoris is not circular. Oh, but then you'd have to have seen one to know that. My bad. In any case, how does that change what I have said about my opposition to MGM and FGM? Oh it doesn't, but you'd have to have read what I said to know that...see a pattern forming? I do.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 07:11 PM
1

1) Your shift key seems to be malfunctioning whenever you try and type exclamation marks. 2) I have no sexual relationship with the World Health Organization, how would one go about that? Please explain. 3) I have not screamed "sexists", I did however, suggest that your disproportionate reaction/unfounded insult hurling may be telling as to your personal views on equality between the sexes. 4) I have linked to several scientifically sound, peer-reviewed, and internationally approved studies that…
/r/MensRights03/05/12 07:00 PM
1

Here's a pretty good one involving you: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/snvl0/of_course_genital_mutilation_is_only_bad_when_it/c4jp284?context=3 Apparently it's okay to call me names and rave that the WHO is a feminist conspiracy when all i have asked is that you cite scientifically peer-reviewed studies...the cornerstone of reasoned debate. But no, it's so much easier to call me names and tell lies than actually admit that a woman can oppose both FGM and MGM.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 06:47 PM
1

I have not hurled insults at you. Kindly do not hurl them at me. Now, instead of having a temper tantrum online, you claim that you have scientific studies that refute the international findings of the WHO...? Splendid, present them and debate can continue.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 06:31 PM
1

I don't see why saying rape is rape is trolling?
/r/MensRights03/05/12 03:47 PM
1

Sorry, a single biased website that is not supported by peer review does not trump the internationally recognized World Health Organization. Find a single peer-reviewed and published study by an organization with a scientific background showing that the WHO is full of falsities (that is internationally accepted), and we'll start from there.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 03:13 PM
0

Because I said we should be fighting against all genital mutilation? Nice guy.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 03:12 PM
0

Oh look, you invented a word. clap clap p.s. you're*
/r/MensRights03/05/12 03:06 PM
0

i never quoted you. Do you see quotation marks? No. Learn to read before you get all butthurt. Saying that women need to dress a certain way to prevent rape inherently implies that any man could be a rapist, and that if confronted with a girl in revealing clothes any man could be overcome with the need to rape. That sword cuts both ways.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 03:05 PM
1

fair enough
/r/MensRights03/05/12 03:03 PM
0

Rape is rape. I don't see why there is a difference in your mind...?
/r/MensRights03/05/12 03:02 PM
1

Sigh...in certain countries the prevalence of Type 3 is up to 98%. So, depending on which country you are in, the prevalence changes. The OVERALL statistic is 20% of ALL CASES, which I'm sure, is of great comfort to the women and girls living in countries like the Sudan, where the instance of type 3 is 98%. Using language like "beloved source" because I cited the WHO (feeling it was a fairly impartial source) kind of paints you like a sexist asshole who is trying to discredit internationally acc…
/r/MensRights02/05/12 09:27 PM
1

Ok, where to begin? Yes, the WHO has a program that provides access for voluntary circumcision. If a grown man wants to remove his foreskin, who am I (or you) to oppose that? Secondly, there is clear evidence that a foreskin COMBINED with not cleaning it properly contributes to the spread of HIV and other STDs/STIs. This does NOT build a case for involuntary circumcision. All it means is that we should make sure men are educated on how to clean their foreskins, and educated them on the reasons w…
/r/MensRights02/05/12 09:17 PM
1

So you believe that men are all on the verge of raping people, and all that is needed is a short skirt? You do a disservice to both our sexes.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 08:50 PM
3

Murder is illegal. Hate speech is illegal. Rape is illegal. If simply making laws eradicated crime the world would be a great place. Apathy is what opens the door to injustice.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 08:20 PM
1

I understand where you are coming from, but in that particular case it's a lot to do with the tone of the commenters.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 08:18 PM
3

Actually, there are cases where it is being done in the adopted country. This is extremely unnerving, and needs to be stopped before its rarity become commonplace. By the same token, why aren't you picketing outside hospitals against MGM? Because I live in Canada where I have a job and responsibilities, so I use my voice and energy to raise awareness and I support organizations in those counties with funding . What do you do?
/r/MensRights02/05/12 06:26 PM
0

I am Canadian, so I have no idea what you are talking about. Secondly, for the very last time, YES, NO ONE IS BLAMING KIDS. I used this an example to show that blaming victims of rape for being raped is wrong. It is easy for ppl to see that with children, and for some reason that ceases to be the case when women are the victims of rape (or, very often men). Obviously humans are the perpetrators of rape. When someone is raped by a dishwasher, please let me know. I was obviously using "men" and "w…
/r/MensRights02/05/12 06:22 PM
1

I never commented in those threads. But uh...thanks for implying that I did.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 06:18 PM
2

I have responded to you several times already, but here we go again: FGM and MGM are directly tied to each other through the religious texts that call for them. You cannot fight against one and ignore the other. Why can't you oppose multiple types of abuse and injustice? Is there a limit on how much injustice we can stand up against?
/r/MensRights02/05/12 05:38 PM
1

It is happening all over the world, and currently being exported the to western world via immigration. The UK has quite a problem with it right now. Horrible practices should be actively condemned. FGM and MGM happen to be directly tied to one another through the religious texts that call for both of them. You can't fight against one and turn a blind eye to the other.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 05:35 PM
1

Srsly guy? 1) Guy labels all women as frigid because the one night he worked as a stripper no one touched him. 2) Arguing that the man should not have to contribute to cleaning the house even though he wasn't employed because the woman was probably just "OCD". 3) Quote: "Men tend to be better at things like management, math, engineering, deep thinking." 4) Claiming that men make all the technological advances. 5) Claiming that women are turned on by monkey porn. If you are a troll, fine. If you …
/r/MensRights02/05/12 05:32 PM
1

Let's try an example to illustrate for you: Around the world baby boys have their penises cut in the name of religion, in violation of their human rights. I am a woman, and I am not Jewsh or Muslim. Therefore I don't care. NO. It is still wrong even if it doesn't affect me. It's called empathy.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 05:26 PM
0

Um yes they are. Did you not have copious amounts of education (eg. stranger danger, good touch bad touch) from your parents/schools? Even with all that education, kids get raped. Why? Power, control, fear, you name it. Shit happens regardless if someone is well prepared or not. You do not blame someone for the actions that were done to them. The flip side of slut-shaming and victim blaming is assuming that all men are rapists, and all they need is a girl in a short skirt to push them over the e…
/r/MensRights02/05/12 05:24 PM
1

Team reason and equality fist bump.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 05:21 PM
3

edited to put some links up. I agree with you though, I should have cited first. Ah well, you live and learn.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 05:09 PM
-3

It's called taking the logic OP has espoused and applying it to other situations of rape. If it doesn't work, the original logic from OP is false. And yes, the point was very much that you never see parents blaming children for being raped. Because blaming a victim for being raped is insane.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 05:07 PM
0

Freudian slip? Sorry couldn't resist. Comedy gold.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 04:48 PM
3

Cool story bro.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 04:46 PM
0

It's not about censorship. I'm not suggesting you have the posts taken down. I saying that by being verbal you can articulate what is and what is not going to be accepted by this community.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 04:46 PM
0

I referenced in this thread: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/t3ebq/if_you_want_respect_police_yourselves/c4j7auj And in the original response: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/t2dnb/almost_four_years_ago_i_was_carjacked_at_gunpoint/c4j6qqt
/r/MensRights02/05/12 04:44 PM
1

Ha. I love that this is being downvoted. Should I not support posters who call out posters that compromise MRA? Sigh.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 04:41 PM
2

Thank you.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 04:39 PM
-1

Well, I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. I got the impression from that and his other posts that he feel it is not a worthwhile cause.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 04:39 PM
1

Uh huh. Cool story bro.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 04:38 PM
3

Is anyone going to call this guy out on being a sexist troll who can only harp on the idea of feminism as a dirty word? Anybody? Anybody? Bueller?
/r/MensRights02/05/12 04:37 PM
1

I like you. You are exactly the type of person I wish there were more off. High five team!
/r/MensRights02/05/12 04:35 PM
7

Take a look at the poster on this very thread: AntiFeministMedia. His responses have been insulting, logically vague, and inappropriate to my original post (both in content and tone). I see no one telling him to shut up. Do you think he helps to further your cause? I don't. Here are some selections of his overview: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/syzwk/if_we_want_to_be_taken_seriously_we_need_to_start/c4i9x16?context=3 http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/sq4vi/female_teacher_…
/r/MensRights02/05/12 04:34 PM
0

Dude, seriously, I am not saying that YOU personally are bad. I am saying that the posters in this forum should "police their own" and call out clearly sexist posters when they see it. If I thought that all the posters in here were horrible, why would I be appealing to your sense of reason and morality?
/r/MensRights02/05/12 04:26 PM
-1

Well, him saying that FGM doesn't need to be fought against seems like it says that FGM isn't an issue that needs to be fought against. More importantly, both FGM and MGM are religiously motivated (from the same texts), and are therefore pretty clearly linked. Why fight against one injustice, and ignore the other that is caused by the same thing? If you want to stamp out the practice, eliminating one and not the other means there is always a backdoor for things to begin again.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 04:24 PM
1

Uh huh. Listen, I'm not a feminist, but you are a troll. When you can debate without resorting to trying to insult me, great. Till then, good riddance.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 04:22 PM
-3

I am referring, in that specific post, to the attitude of victim-blaming, as well as the OP's response to having his argument placed in a different context. Let's be equal now, show me a link that shows a fair and equal balance between the rights of men and women, and I will post another post showing the opposite.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 04:21 PM
1

Yes I do. I've also said that when I used the OP's own logic in a different context (children, jail) it falls flat. My point being, why is it ok to victim-blame when it's a woman, but not in any other case?
/r/MensRights02/05/12 04:18 PM
-2

Why do you keep throwing around the word feminist like it's a dirty word? Why is everything negative immediately "feminist"? When you do things like that you give your opponents opportunity to latch on to what seems to be a hatred of women. NOTE: I am not saying you hate women, only that someone (SRS) could easily look at your use of the word feminism/feminist as evidence of a dislike of women/women's rights. What I am trying to say, is that MRA needs to emulate debaters like Richard Dawkins, wh…
/r/MensRights02/05/12 04:16 PM
-4

I copied his quote 2 lines below, but here it is again: "There is absolutely no reason for me to 'fight' for female circumcision."
/r/MensRights02/05/12 04:12 PM
-1

It was coherent. I didn't include links with the original because I wrote it in the heat of the moment, and didn't take the time to copy pasta. Chill.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 04:11 PM
1

No, my accusation is not false. You wanted a thread, there is a thread. You argue against its legitimacy by saying "thats likely a feminist made thread.." well, I would be thrilled to find out it was bullshit. And the frequency of those attitudes isn't what gives them power, it's when no MRAs stand up and say "This is wrong, stop."
/r/MensRights02/05/12 04:10 PM
1

Well, editing your quote after I comment on it isn't very polite. Your original post was: "You are a false accuser." I am citing sources. please follow the links. And again, the hostility that you present is part of what I am talking about. I am not your opponent, but immediately you launch into me and call me disgusting. That's not necessary, or appropriate. You call yourself a misogynist, what do you mean by that? Do you think that men should have more rights/superiority?
/r/MensRights02/05/12 04:07 PM
1

Here is a direct copy pasta quote from that thread: "There is absolutely no reason for me to 'fight' for female circumcision. Female circumcision is very rare. It is conducted very remote locations of Africa and Asia where circumcision is literally the LOWEST of the problems in the region. It is BANNED in any even remotely civilized nation. However, male circumcision is completely LEGAL and even PROMOTED/PRAISED in CIVILIZED nations. When was the last time you met a circumcised woman? Probably n…
/r/MensRights02/05/12 04:04 PM
1

There are a LOT of posters who do call ppl out, and I think those guys are great.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 04:03 PM
0

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/t2dnb/almost_four_years_ago_i_was_carjacked_at_gunpoint/ Unfortunately this thread is full of it.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 04:03 PM
-4

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/t2dnb/almost_four_years_ago_i_was_carjacked_at_gunpoint/ This thread is full of posters arguing that women deserve to be raped. I made the point that the OP's own argument (if you put yourself in harm's way, expect to be harmed), is RIDICULOUS when put in other contexts (children raped by family, men raped in jail). I went on to say that YES, we should be educating people on how to avoid dangerous situations, but the idea that education only will preve…
/r/MensRights02/05/12 04:02 PM
-1

I am posting them now. I only have 2 hands.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 04:00 PM
-1

Here is a thread where a guy argues that FGM doesn't matter because MGM happens more. That is disgusting. We should be fighting together to stop the mutilation of children, regardless of gender. Not arguing that one's frequency negates the other. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/snvl0/of_course_genital_mutilation_is_only_bad_when_it/c4ivdr5?context=3
/r/MensRights02/05/12 03:59 PM
-1

I have no idea what you are trying to say...
/r/MensRights02/05/12 03:56 PM
-2

I'm not holding you to any standards higher than I hold myself to. And, I'm sorry, how does telling posters in here that it's not okay to spout bullshit relate to feminism in any way? If you actually care about MRA, then you will WANT to stop people posting inflammatory bullshit, but since you somehow took my post as a leaping off point for a rant about feminism, I assume that you don't. You are exactly the type of poster I have a problem with.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 03:55 PM
-5

Really? How so? I'm all up for intelligent debate, but you've got to bring something to the table.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 03:25 PM
-1

So when children are raped in their homes by family members, they really should just have avoided their creepy aunts and uncles, right? I mean, they should know they're taking a risk hanging around them, right? Or when someone is raped in jail, they should really have known better than to hang around those guys who seemed a little "rapey". It's a complicated issue that is not easily compared with carjacking. Can people take precautions? Yes. Will that stop all instances of rape? No. Does promoti…
/r/MensRights02/05/12 03:20 PM
0

I don't know what website you think you have, but here is a quote taken directly from the WHO's site link: Type 1: Clitoridectomy: partial or total removal of the clitoris (a small, sensitive and erectile part of the female genitals) and, in very rare cases, only the prepuce (the fold of skin surrounding the clitoris). In the link you provided, here is a quote from the Type IV section: There is no mention of removing only the clitoral hood as described by Dr. Nowa Omoigui. I maintain that you ha…
/r/MensRights02/05/12 02:52 PM
1

Type 4 implies there are 3 other types...are they irrelevant? You are also wrong about type 4. Type 1 is the removal of the clitoral hood. Here are some references for you, since you have so much trouble citing your sources. Now, if you read my comment, you'll see that I said both FGM and MGM (if you will) are wrong and abhorrent. If you want to fight against the mutilation of the genitals of children and adults alike, you fight against it all. Not just for boys, not just for girls. Wrong is wro…
/r/MensRights01/05/12 02:18 PM
1

No it isn't. Calling FGM "circumcision" is completely incorrect. Circumcision literally means an incision around the circumference. FGM is a complete removal of (often by gouging) the clitoris, followed by sewing the labia shut. I am NOT a supporter of circumcision. AT ALL. It's not my body, it's not my choice. However, there are major differences between FGM and male circumcision, and they should be acknowledged. Understanding and acknowledging the facts does NOT negate the injustice of BOTH ac…
/r/MensRights25/04/12 05:25 PM
7

That may be how SOME women treat men. It is certainly not ALL. Just as SOME men are horrible misogynists, not ALL are. If you want to stand up for men's rights (as there are DEFINITELY areas that they get trampled in) this incredibly juvenile attitude negates any valid points you may try and make. You can't demand respect, or claim to support equality while suggesting that men should "use them when needed"
/r/MensRights23/04/12 05:41 PM
5

I think we can all agree that hacking away at any baby's genitals (male or female) in the name of a bronze age fairy tale is a terrible thing...
/r/MensRights23/04/12 04:12 PM
1

Yes. It is a question the author is asking...looking at a historical event. It is not applicable to 2012. Move on.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 02:33 PM
2

Look, it was 100 years ago. Rights have changed since then, the concept of chivalry (and the expectation of men to sacrifice themselves) is not the cultural norm anymore. The women WOULD have been left in a terrible situation. They were not really allowed to work, and if they couldn't remarry they would end up penniless and unable to provide for their children. Hell, they couldn't even vote in 1912...you want to talk about how far we have come as a culture, that's a pretty good milestone...now 5…
/r/MensRights16/04/12 07:56 PM
-6

lol, I was thinking the same thing.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 06:14 PM
2

Please cite sources.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 04:24 PM
1

Yay for Canada! Does anyone know how this compares to the USA's laws, and what protections are offered (or not offered) to men who are raped, etc?
/r/MensRights13/04/12 04:17 PM
1

interesting... Any lawyers who can comment on how this affects charges and the degrees of severity of the crimes?
/r/MensRights13/04/12 03:24 PM
1

Twlight is awful. For everyone. Always. I need to go wash out my brain. Excuse me.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 02:30 PM
0

I'm pretty sure that would be sexual assault, not rape. Again, if anyone has any law background, I think they would be the best to give input...because (at least in Canada) I have never heard anything so preposterous...
/r/MensRights13/04/12 02:29 PM
2

That's not feminist...that's an asshole. Sheesh guys...
/r/MensRights13/04/12 12:19 PM
1

I'm pretty sure removing a condom does not constitute rape...can you provide sources?
/r/MensRights13/04/12 12:01 PM
2

Um...I think we can all agree that sitcoms do not portray either sex in a positive light... You want to raise a kid without weird gender ideas? Turn off MTV and give them some books.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 11:58 AM
2

Chemo or not, her chances of being a biological parent at 44 are VERY iffy... Why should she get to circumvent nature AND potentially force her ex of 6 yrs into paying child support...? There are so many unwanted kids...she should stop being selfish and adopt.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 04:00 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter