TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

pipsname Archive

View 9 posts and 175 comments by pipsname on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
18

Y'all remember that episode of Stargate when they used the word "breeder" as an insult?
/r/MensRights29/06/26 11:50 PM
56

Lol and literally the next line after that is "Cell phones and camera enabled devices are prohibited in locker rooms."
/r/MensRights28/12/24 01:37 PM
78

'FALSE ACCUSATIONS': Markham dad cleared by cops after Amber Alert | Toronto Sun - https://torontosun.com/news/local-news/false-accusations-markham-dad-cleared-by-cops-after-amber-alert
/r/MensRights20/08/22 12:45 PM
7

Racism isn't racist in who can be a victim of racism. Sexism isn't sexist in who can be a victim of sexism.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 01:08 AM
5

And not needed.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 04:36 PM
0

About something you didn't even read. And then talked about how OPs numbers were a real average when that is not how you calculate averages. You looked at a specific content and not the context. This is on you. Edit: That is 1 person blocked total not one person average. Just in case you were trying to use your style of "metrics".
/r/MensRights13/07/22 08:22 PM
1

Lol that quote was from the article that the image OP posted is from. The numbers OP posted are not average. It is a percentage of total events.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 08:16 PM
0

"The percentages are often used to argue whether, on average, it is fathers or mothers that pose a greater risk of harm to their children. But when trying to determine which parent, on average poses the greater danger, categories like Foster Parent, Daycare Staff, Friend or Neighbor, etc. are entirely irrelevant. The calculations below factor out those categories to produce a more accurate picture".
/r/MensRights13/07/22 04:07 PM
0

I do apologize. In my culture teaching by showing is better than just telling. I used the data from that OP linked to. The statistics used in OPs link is not a metric. It is just total events. You are not crossing them with other data. Using total population broken down into parenting groups like what was done in the first article OP link that created the image to get their statistic we can then create a metric.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 11:50 PM
0

The comment is a response to the question. The question is implied in it because it's a reply to it.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 10:08 PM
0

You are focusing on some content of the post and not the context of the post. More data and understanding is needed. Hence why my answer to the top commenter is what I put. This comment thread should only be about "why OPs data is not talked about". Answer: Not enough data points.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 07:25 PM
1

Dude if you read the first link OP posted. The article that gives the data for the image OP posted, it makes the argument to factor out other people and focus on each parent.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 10:15 AM
1

You didn't read the first link OP posted that gave the data for the image did you? That data in the image that you are defending is assuming it and thus my analysis is correct. Please read the link next.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 10:12 AM
1

Looks like that has already been answered.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 10:09 AM
1

That you didn't read the first link OP posted.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 10:08 AM
0

"Because just saying "oh this isnt enough data" is just demeaning and untrue. Theres already plenty of data on the subject at hand, this is just adding to that." Which is more than the data that OP linked thus answering the top comments question... You are getting overly emotional and creating an argument that isn't there.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 03:59 AM
0

Your first interaction with me and you told me that I am on a high horse. How about you slow your roll there. I keep telling you that my comment was not about what makes the perfect combination of data but rather just to answer the top commenters question on why OPs data is not talked about. I get it. You have had experiences and OPs data seems to confirm your thoughts on the matter but the fact remains that my comment was not a piece on the topic of what parents are better but simply "why is no…
/r/MensRights11/07/22 02:15 AM
-1

Dude. I never said anything about what parent should get the child in any circumstances. I just showed why OPs data is not talked about because the top commenter asked why it isnt. Talk about me not having basic common courtesy. You seem to be having this imaginary argument with something I pointed out that shows that we need more data on and can't just use OPs data in the image.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 01:58 AM
0

The data is literally in OPs first link. You know the link with the "simplieddata" in the url. The population data was posted to the comment. The link even has an anchor tag to bring you to the table that OPs image used. But again. The point that you keep missing is that the top commenter asked why OPs data was not being talked about and you just asking me to go over my numbers shows why. OPs data is not enough to talk about. You need more data. You are focusing on the fly and not getting out of…
/r/MensRights10/07/22 11:26 PM
-5

You seem to have trouble with comment flows. That is a lot of words to show that you didn't read the top commenter asked a question on OPs data on why it was not talked about. The data on its own does not show a complete picture. Which is what? Why no one is talking about it. More data is needed.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 11:19 PM
1

Seems like your translation application is not working well.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 11:15 PM
-1

The numbers are not the point. The top commenter asked why OPs numbers are not talked about. The numbers on their own do not show anything meaningful and needs other data. Also the data is from the first link OP cited. I even put the link in the previous comment with column titles. If you would like to crunch the numbers to other statistics you can find please start your own top comment. The top comment asked a question and I gave an answer I felt was the reason why.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 11:13 PM
1

None of the data is mine. What is the point you are trying to make?
/r/MensRights10/07/22 09:14 PM
1

Mother only and father only data from OPs first link http://www.breakingthescience.org/SimplifiedDataFromDHHS.php#data There are two columns for each row "Child abuse and neglect" and "Child fatalities". I just added them together. Both columns represent things that should never happen to a child. OP stated the data as a reason for fathers to have full custody. The top comment asks why the data OP posted was not talked about. The data alone doesn't show a good picture of the situation and thus t…
/r/MensRights10/07/22 08:26 PM
2

You sure you are not focusing on specific content rather than the context of the entire post? You are free to put your own numbers. But the fact that you want to see the data answers your own top comment question. The data alone is not useful. You asked the question. Got an answer and for some weird reason you want to argue about something that is not your original question. If you are just looking to argue online then say it.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 07:02 PM
1

Dude. You keep proving my point. Context matters. Hence why you don't see OPs numbers talked about... You can do your own math but the fact is you need other data with OPs data. Which answers your first question. Is that clear enough?
/r/MensRights10/07/22 05:23 PM
-2

"men?" Do you see the question mark? The data linked by OP is part of the story and looking at it with other data is important. Even such as the data you are requesting from me for some reason. You asked why the data linked by OP is not being talked about. You got an answer.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 05:17 PM
1

Incorrect. My comment was to show that OPs data alone was not helpful and thus answered the question you asked. If you would like to start another top comment thread about this new topic please feel free.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 05:11 PM
2

OP stated their data shows why fathers should get full custody. Please ask them your question.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 05:02 PM
3

My 'method'? Also that is your conclusion. The top comment asked why the OPs numbers are not talked about. All I did was show why due to the numbers alone are meaningless without context. You drew your own conclusions.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 04:56 PM
0

Op stated in the first sentence "Yet another reason to award men full-custody"and the continued singled out statements.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 04:50 PM
-18

It shows that the reason you don't see that data being talked about is because it on its own doesn't equate to anything.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 01:58 PM
-41

Probably because when you divide them by the total single female/male households the ratio is higher for men? I can't quickly find the data for the same years as the linked data in OPs post but using what google throws up for current data "Number of U.S. children living in a single parent family 1970-2020. In 2020, there were about 15.31 million children living with a single mother in the United States, and about 3.27 million children living with a single father. Sept 3, 2021 • U.S. children liv…
/r/MensRights10/07/22 01:18 PM
1

Did that article cite an op-ed as it's source?
/r/MensRights04/06/22 10:02 AM
1

It doesn't remove the burden of proof and does not excuse those events informing evidence.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 03:54 PM
1

They asked? You must have some insider information (insert petty name calling here).
/r/MensRights30/05/22 11:47 AM
0

The literal first sentence of the title.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 11:09 AM
0

All speculative. The portapotties are not evil man hating portapotties. A shooter could have been full and a honey wagon was on the way.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 11:00 AM
0

The creation of this thread was stupid. Victim mentally stuff thinking the portapotties are out to oppress the men and carry women like goddesses.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 10:27 AM
0

And to shit in it more they need plumbing to empty it.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 10:18 AM
1

And plumbing is needed to empty them. You want your event staff to tell everyone "the shitters full" or "plumbing issue"?
/r/MensRights30/05/22 10:14 AM
1

I guess the pumps on the vacuum trucks are just for show.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 10:09 AM
1

And it could be full and they are bringing in the honey wagon. They still have to plumb a line to empty it.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 09:58 AM
1

You know what country you are talking about right?
/r/MensRights30/05/22 09:56 AM
1

It may not be your problem but it is a fact.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 09:55 AM
0

I am willing to speculate that the bathroom situation is not a man hater situation.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 09:55 AM
3

We don't. We don't know anything other than a bathroom was out of order and there was a total of 5 with 3 originally designated to women and 2 to men. That is the point. OP made a post starting off assuming something with zero evidence. When OP asked the staff they said they were working on fixing it.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 10:17 PM
4

The public/government are the insurance company? Just because they can rent out the land does not mean they are the entirety of requirements.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 09:35 PM
2

Or it could. The burden of proof is on OP for making the claim that the event holders are out to get men.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 09:15 PM
3

It is full? OP is the one making the argument here. The burden of proof is on them. I came up with some multiple possible reasons as to why they could not be out to get men.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 09:14 PM
2

Would it?
/r/MensRights29/05/22 08:25 PM
1

We don't know the statistics of the event. It could be 85% women.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 06:09 PM
1

The statistics of the event have not been shown so we can only speculate but men piss and poop, women piss, poop, and have periods so a 2 to 3 number seems reasonable.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 06:08 PM
4

Have you looked at their insurance policy?
/r/MensRights29/05/22 06:03 PM
1

They didn't provide anything. Like you they made the assumption that it would be easier to switch it then to just fix it. While they are switching it they are probably not fixing it so the job takes even longer than just fixing it.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 06:02 PM
4

Neither is the assumption that it can just be unisex.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 06:00 PM
-6

It is when you can't have the event without the policy in place.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 05:58 PM
-1

And you have not provided details on what it would take for them to do that VS them just fixing the temporary problem. Are the signs fixed? Is it easier to fix the problem than to move the signs multiple times? Do they have the staff available to do this?
/r/MensRights29/05/22 05:55 PM
-7

It could be an insurance policy limitation.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 05:48 PM
-1

So they were in the process of making it better for all and you took the opportunity to take a picture and make a post about jt. Got it.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 05:47 PM
-1

And that means you got all the proper information?
/r/MensRights29/05/22 05:46 PM
1

Could be a limitation of their insurance policy.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 05:28 PM
1

Probably limitations set by their insurance policy.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 05:27 PM
-11

Women also have periods. They have more uses for a bathroom than a man. This thread is just bullshit.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 05:26 PM
4

When you asked the staff their response was what? All you have done so far is assume stuff. They could have been in the process of doing just that. You don't know you just went straight to being upset about something you don't have all the information on.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 05:21 PM
4

A plumbing issue never crossed your mind?
/r/MensRights29/05/22 05:01 PM
3

"who didn't want to be kissed" I am sure he was very apt in his discovery of that desire from them.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 03:46 PM
-6

I see 5 units. Was the second male one broken or something? 3-2 does not seem bad. Women do have more uses for a bathroom than a men.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 03:39 PM
5

Correct. 19,119,977 women 18,885,261 men 2020 stats.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 01:44 PM
0

/andtheyallclapped
/r/MensRights08/02/21 09:45 PM
0

You comment is stupid. I was stating the reason of the article VS OPs interpretation. You want to talk about the article this is not the comment chain to do it under.
/r/MensRights08/02/21 09:20 PM
-12

The article is not about women being out of work due to covid but rather women out of work to care for their children due to covid.
/r/MensRights08/02/21 03:24 PM
4

They did touch and kiss. His body was shot at and put into dangerous situations. There was no reason for the soul to enter that body. From the mythos of creating bodies from sand they needed to use another person's body?
/r/MensRights28/12/20 09:40 AM
8

Off topic but that image is nice.
/r/MensRights25/12/20 02:54 PM
3

Shared custody has been a thing in the CCB for some time. It will pay both parents half.
/r/MensRights24/12/20 01:24 PM
1

The CCB already has a section for shared custody which splits payments to each payment. This article is just missing so much information. To give money to the families it has to know who to give it to. If you never signed a form before saying who to give it to they assume the mother. When you adopt you don't adopt as a couple. A person adopts making them the primary caregiver.
/r/MensRights24/12/20 01:23 PM
1

If I remember correctly couples do not adopt a person does making them the primary caregiver.
/r/MensRights24/12/20 01:18 PM
1

You don't think that men being auto categorized as someone with less compassion than women is not a men's issue?
/r/MensRights08/05/20 03:03 PM
24

"aesthetically pleasing" This is how people be talking about a child's penis. Stop romanticizing about a child's penis.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 12:30 AM
22

So many adults fixated on the babies penis being pretty.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 12:28 AM
-1

This is a call to action from within that group. They did not say that it is only them.
/r/MensRights22/12/19 04:25 PM
2

Do they not have cameras in the private room?
/r/MensRights18/12/19 04:49 PM
1

Men are trash because of the western culture around them? Sounds like blaming the victim to me.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 04:05 PM
4

'As a pharmacist I recognise your profession is under jeopardy as is potentially your ability to travel to family in America with this conviction.' Yeah. Give her the ability to do this to children in America too. Fucking golf clap.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 04:42 AM
1

This seems like a cash grab imo. Sure the entry level is lower but not the exit right? This seems like it is setting these women up to fail.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 07:25 PM
2

Also this. https://reddit.com/r/TooAfraidToAsk/comments/cqenqt/for_men_when_you_take_a_sit_down_to_poop_does/ewvsnbp?context=3
/r/MensRights22/08/19 03:57 PM
0

Looks like a fake account that is used multiple times https://i.imgur.com/Bj9hk4I.jpg
/r/MensRights08/08/19 09:20 PM
1

Looks like she is sitting in the middle of two seats.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 01:13 PM
1

Got any data or are you just talking? I clicked on the link to the sub and seen many post about feminism. Could be time of day or whatever. Without data your thread is just crap. Unless you are attempting to start an argument. Bring the data and we will have a discussion. Much better than arguments.
/r/MensRights05/08/19 03:22 PM
6

I used Google and got men's rights post. Search history plays a part in Google's results.
/r/MensRights14/04/19 06:08 PM
17

Didn't Cosby have accusers?
/r/MensRights27/03/19 10:01 PM
1

I don't know if I am allowed to post his Facebook but he has a couple of post talking about his experience and does not blame his ex. Nor did he blame the school staff so will have to wait until we get more information.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 08:31 PM
2

after staff reported a student had been “abducted from her classroom by her father.”
/r/MensRights20/03/19 08:17 PM
2

"after staff reported a student had been “abducted from her classroom by her father.”"
/r/MensRights20/03/19 08:05 PM
1

You mean the dude that once stepped aside of basically winning the last election so Hillary could have a good chance to win?
/r/MensRights20/02/19 09:11 PM
4

I may have missed something. You dislike something and someone else some how knew you did not like it and they decided to come find you to call you names?
/r/MensRights15/01/19 04:15 PM
6

I did not see a single thing you are talking about. The whole video to me is just Crew's quote in scripted form.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 02:08 PM
1

Hey board of directors meet the "leaders of directors" team.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 09:42 PM
20

This world is going, going, gone https://i.imgur.com/1u4MxjC.jpg
/r/MensRights02/10/18 10:15 PM
3

Just because you feel that it is a smaller problem does not mean it is not a problem. We don't need to whine. We can talk about it.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 12:08 AM
5

America may never have a draft again. But we’re still punishing low-income men for not registering - The Washington Post - https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/storyline/wp/2014/10/16/america-may-never-have-a-draft-again-but-were-still-punishing-low-income-men-for-not-registering/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.bbee862a0db4
/r/MensRights07/09/18 09:52 PM
2

Ma'am.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 10:55 PM
-1

The article describes a woman's attempt to punish a man for using "sexual slurs". At their place of work. The Senate of all places. She believes women should have the right to be free from the words that men say that they don't like. It was an angsty childish quip that was not a logical response to the debate. "Stop shagging men" is not a response to men attacking women. It's an attempt at suppressing the rights of and further demonizing men and their "toxic masculinity.". The meat of the real s…
/r/MensRights02/07/18 10:25 PM
-5

I am at a loss on how this is a men's rights issue? Edit: downvoted with no replies... No one going to help me connect the dots or are we just supposed to be upeset that she is upset that someone said something unprofessional at their place of business? Hypocrisy on her part or not how does this tie into men's rights? Can not men not bring lawyers when a female says the same thing? Where are our rights being held back?
/r/MensRights02/07/18 01:41 PM
3

"Ultimately, if we want more innovation and better products, we’ve got to put more money behind women and minorities". That seems like a claim with no source. I got one. "If we want more innovation and better products, we've got to put more money behind general education for everyone "
/r/MensRights07/06/18 12:00 AM
1

"As I hammer my fingers into a keyboard in spots of my choosing without consent from the keyboard it allows me to send packet data from my (because I own and enslave it) computer which I turned on without its permission. This packet data then gets sent from my computer which sends it to another computer. They exchange permission to communicate and send and receive data which I forced my computer to partake in. All this just to talk about a robot and it's ability to give or deny permission for so…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/18 03:55 PM
2

Alternative conversation. Imagine growing up as that child knowing this. We often hear that kids were planned or not planned but never maliciously planned.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 10:42 AM
1

Doesn't she have the same relationship with the dark hair girl?
/r/MensRights14/04/18 04:46 AM
4

Wow that is quite the thing. Good little thing to know. Thank you.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 08:38 PM
7

Was one of those reasons a paternity test?
/r/MensRights31/03/18 08:22 PM
1

I am missing something. What is the agenda and why is it bad?
/r/MensRights19/03/18 10:44 PM
28

"Why are you preventing me from mutilating the babies penis?”. -Them probably.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 04:10 PM
1

I feel like context is needed.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/18 02:08 PM
3

By reminding ourselves and teaching others that it is not just about all men and not only about men. It is about bad people. - #MeToo Takes Down a Woman? Politician Accused of Sexual Harassment Drops Out of Kansas Race - http://www.newsweek.com/metoo-woman-kansas-democrat-749570
/r/MensRights02/02/18 11:28 PM
2

"The Men's Rights subreddit is a place for those who wish to discuss men's rights and the ways said rights are infringed upon." What am I missing? Maybe a link to the article so I can find more information? Just from that image alone I do not see how this person was affected because he was a man.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 02:43 AM
2

I wonder what the case is for these people.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/01/18 09:42 PM
15

Consent. Consent is needed for it to not be rape. Can both parties give consent?
/r/PussyPassDenied31/01/18 06:03 PM
-2

Let me rage will you!
/r/MensRights12/01/18 05:34 AM
1

Guys. She said she was sorry.
/r/MensRights22/12/17 06:41 PM
2

Just wait until these people see the untapped keg that are babies. Babies get called the wrong sex all the time.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 05:11 PM
6

I never got the power thing. Scumbag. They assault because they are scumbags.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 05:04 PM
13

She did not note it but rather used it as a reasoning for the person failure to understand a topic.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 07:46 AM
1

Where was this posted?
/r/MensRights24/10/17 07:17 PM
1

All the down votes and angry responses you got are silly. They completely miss your last words. It is hard work holding onto hatred and anger.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 02:46 AM
18

You want to change it challenge the source.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 10:23 PM
19

I may be wrong but it may have been a shock item.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 07:37 PM
2

Trin knows what's up.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 07:35 PM
2

Lost all faith in humanity over this nobody making this troll comment?
/r/MensRights27/08/17 04:55 PM
11

10000! That means 1 female = at least 36 males. (10000 / 276 ) Edit: http://i.imgur.com/YgSFp0n.png
/r/MensRights08/07/17 04:27 PM
8

Thanks for the info! Like I said. I thought it but had no proof to show.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:19 AM
20

The choice was removed from you. Even if you are ok with the results that is your reaction. You can not expect others to have the same as "I feel this way you should too" is not a proper argument tool.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:08 AM
-11

I think that is true about the HIV/AIDS thing. But. Let that be a choice of the person not the parent. If the person wants to get circumcised as a way to combat HIV/AIDS that is their choice.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:01 AM
2

Is Romain mansplanning about manspreadding?
/r/MensRights14/06/17 05:14 PM
2

Sooooo she wants more female terrorist?
/r/MensRights06/06/17 09:00 PM
4

Wonderful work finding the context.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 01:26 AM
1

There isn't enough things that can kill you in Australia? EDIT: After talking with some local guys they think this is ok as long as the lower tier is sent to bush fires. While long and hard work it is more manageable by more body types. It's seems reasonable once put into that perspective.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 04:07 PM
4

More than 0 for anyone is wrong. Thank you for the link OP.
/r/MensRights17/12/16 03:50 PM
14

Why is protection from violence a prize awarded to the largest group of victims?
/r/MensRights17/12/16 03:42 PM
1

"She said she did not charge the family for tutoring him,” the affidavit adds.“ Oh thank fucking God for that! (っ ºДº)っ ︵ ⌨ Is the boy currently 14 or currently 12?
/r/MensRights28/10/16 10:34 PM
-12

I think I need a bit more info on this story. All I can think is "You are a parent and your children are your legacy. Buy a house for you and your children." I feel like there is more to the story and I need to know it before picking a side. Until then I support what ever is in the best interest of the children to live and grow in a modest environment even if it means spending this dirty money on them.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 01:34 AM
5

Is it a reasonable assumption though? Or is it just an echo of the loudest minority being assumed as the largest straight male demographic?
/r/MensRights22/06/16 12:01 PM
7

If combining our income to purchase something for both of us is a problem now, it will be a problem later.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 11:13 PM
6

These things needs to be numbered for reading order.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 06:27 PM
2

Thank you for answering my question. And give your SO a high five.
/r/MensRights01/05/16 08:55 PM
570

This person does not have access to shelter services like women generally have where he lives correct?
/r/MensRights01/05/16 05:42 AM
1

Stay at homes are currency earners as their role is needed for the household. All income made by a household members is household income.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 08:01 AM
2

I am lost. Is not any income made by a person living in a household a "household income"? Who ever stays home and who ever goes to work it does not matter as you are both doing what is needed for the household. My wife works and takes home $1000cad/wk. That means the household income is $1000cad/wk. I do not get where these studies apply zero income to stay at homes.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 10:44 AM
1

I would like a source that digs a little deeper for male victims. For example when a female teacher rapes a young man there is never words shared from the victim. Yes I will assume that we are still at a point where male victims can not express their thoughts in many words but in time other victims can build upon the thoughts and feelings expressed by others in the past.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 11:24 PM
3

Whenever I have down voted comments it is because I was drunk and do not remember posting them.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 12:11 PM
4

These from my experience have to be renewed regularly. Well in my case every year. You are right that I did not make that case in my first post as I was making an assumption this school had a similar process as our school. Thank you for pointing that out.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 01:46 PM
-1

I do not see in the story where your sister informed the school that you were coming or added you to the list of approved people. I do get the feeling that you are kind hearted person that would move the earth and moon for anyone that asked without hurting a fly but unfortunately schools have systems in place to try and protect the children (and their own legal reason). You were just caught up in the middle of some legal mumbo jumbo and that does suck. But honestly in my opinion, when your siste…
/r/MensRights06/02/16 12:59 PM
6

"He was asking for it judge, he had an erection" "She was asking for it judge, did you see how she was dresses?" How about people stop raping people?
/r/MensRights23/08/15 11:17 PM
4

It shows that it is beneficial in locals without access to soap and water yet being suggested in places that do have it as "the better option".
/r/MensRights01/03/15 05:14 AM
2

I am for the removal of tax on these items. I do not feel that this is a sexist issue just one that was forgotten over time as there are less desirable alternatives at the time of taxation these alternatives were in wide use. But these new methods are being taught to be used by parents and most importantly the school systems but avoiding the non-taxed methods. So I feel that since this is an item that even our school systems teach as a necessity makes these items unfairly taxed as men avoid the …
/r/MensRights19/02/15 04:44 PM
2

Well I guess I should have read it till the end then lol.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 01:57 AM
1

Wow almost a million views and not one comment. This site is new to me but looking at other articles that disparity does not seem to happen.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 01:47 AM
1

Yeah. You are right
/r/MensRights28/01/15 02:12 AM
1

Here is a non wiki source. http://www.thestar.com/yourtoronto/education/2014/08/13/ontario_teachers_already_looking_ahead_to_snow_days.html
/r/MensRights28/01/15 01:04 AM
1

I am a 33 year old IT man for Trilliam Lakes District School Board. I know because I get students to help me with projects if they are caught up. Wiki is fine as no kid will edit it so they can go to school.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 12:50 AM
0

" A snow day in the United States and Canada is a day that school classes are cancelled or delayed by snow, heavy ice, or extremely low temperatures. Similar measures occur in response to flooding, tornado watches, severe weather(storms, hurricanes, dense fog, heavy snow, etc.). The criterion for a snow day is primarily the inability of school buses to operate safely on their routes and danger to children who walk to school. Often, the school remains officially open even though buses do not run …
/r/MensRights28/01/15 12:40 AM
1

In Canada they remain open.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 10:12 PM
-13

Schools have snow days calculated into the curriculum. Nothing is stopping her from taking the child to school herself. The schools are always open. They just do not want to be the ones to put your child at risk. EDIT: I do not know what all the down votes are for. " A snow day in the United States and Canada is a day that school classes are cancelled or delayed by snow, heavy ice, or extremely low temperatures. Similar measures occur in response to flooding, tornado watches, severe weather(stor…
/r/MensRights27/01/15 04:20 PM
2

" It cites research claiming 16-year-olds today are more likely to own a smart phone than live with their fathers" Anyone have the source on this?
/r/MensRights02/01/15 07:46 PM
3

So the copy pasted quotes are from another article?
/r/MensRights02/01/15 01:37 AM
6

Help her report it to the police?
/r/MensRights23/11/14 11:45 PM
10

Why not ban unsuprevised children instead of adults with money.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 05:50 AM
2

Elderly feeding birds and wild life do.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 05:44 AM
8

I like how the talking points in the picture do not talk about benefits to the child. "Why am I doing this?"
/r/MensRights15/09/14 09:44 AM
4

[Humour] Reminds me of http://imgur.com/k1Z9DIM
/r/MensRights19/08/14 08:32 PM
1

Yes and is logical as well. Time to upvote with wives account.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 12:31 PM
0

They sat on him and broke his collar bone.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 04:18 AM
3

His collar bone was broken. Harm was already done was it not?
/r/MensRights26/07/14 04:17 AM
1

Arm chair laywer here. "Castle Doctrine"?
/r/MensRights26/07/14 01:41 AM
12

http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/domestic-violence-industry/refuting-40-years-of-lies-about-violence/ You are right. Decades ago we were more open.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 11:51 PM
3

That is not spending money to take care of your children. That is spending money to access your children so you can spend time and resources with them.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 01:09 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter