TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

placeholder-123 Archive

View 0 posts and 95 comments by placeholder-123 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)

Is every woman on this sub mentally impaired? They're always asking stupid questions like this one
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:35 PM

Yeah yeah sure, you're going to tell me patching up wounds is so much harder than getting blasted to bits in a ditch somewhere. Every woman is conveniently a healer, an expert in whatever happens far away from the frontline or a homemaker when things get tough. Not that I care, it's your biological nature, this idea of equality is utterly stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 05:26 PM

It is certainly funny that you, as a woman, coincidentally happen to desire the less risky and easier role
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 04:07 PM
1

Are you a woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 10:16 AM
6

Unfortunately what you hold "sacred" or "part of your soul" is not the way women see it. To them, it's inadequate.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 10:16 AM
1

What an incredibly stupid take
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 07:05 PM

Don't bother, some people in this sub are really stupid
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 07:55 AM
-1

Or more likely women will quit their bullshit of their own volition. If only we could realize we need each other as complementary beings
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 07:53 AM
11

Yes, be as individualistic and nihilistic as you want until you get personally hit by the "decline". Then you'll call for others to help but you'll find yourself alone
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 10:16 AM

claim every single woman does it its absurd Can we stop with this shallow reasoning? OP is being hyperbolic to demonstrate a general trend. I'm sure you can find at least one woman who genuinely does not care but this does not matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 01:07 PM
1

That's only valid if there's 1) a tribe they're feuding with 2) of similar size neither of which are a given. Besides biologically it's "better" to be conquered or integrated into another tribe than to be barred from transmitting your genes. The thing with male babies is mostly because of legacy and greater potential. In primitive societies a woman is a mother for the most part ; it's unlikely she'll randomly die or whatever but it's also unlikely she'll become a great warrior or something which…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 02:07 PM
1

Oh my bad I misread your comment. Well you still have a non-null chance of getting through it. Besides such an extreme basically never happens, but you can recover from say losing 20% of your men whereas losing 20% of your women is a major setback
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 01:41 PM
2

The result is still the same
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 01:32 PM
5

It's just male disposability. If 1 000 000 men die it's a statistic, if 10 women die it's a tragedy. It's because in prehistoric times say in a tribe of 200 people (100 women / 100 men) if 95 men die they can still technically father a new generation. If 95 women die well then you're screwed.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 09:58 AM
0

Your comment is weird the first 3/4 sound like you just regurgitated the most basic red pill PUA tropes. Besides, marriage is only idiot nowadays, and monogamy is factually dead as a social norm. It also depends what you mean by 'natural'. Nature gave us reason to adjust our instincts towards something greater, IMO. Anyway, don't ask me, right now I'm working on myself and not bothering with women as I'm still young. I had my successes but rn the effort required to get essentially low quality wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/23 08:09 AM
1

If anything this reasoning works even more in the west since traditional safeguards have been abolished. Marriage is worthless, monogamy is dead, technology is ubiquitous, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/23 07:56 AM
1

Well yeah idk if this supports it 100% because they don't want men in general to stop approaching. They want average (aka low value in 2023) men to select themselves out of the pool
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/23 05:45 PM
3

Yeah right. They're just trying to make men select themselves out of the dating pool so they have less work to do in order to identify a high value male
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/23 03:25 PM
6

What you need to understand is that if you're attractive you can approach women whenever and wherever. All this NPC talk about how it's not acceptable to approach women is meant to discourage low value males from doing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/23 01:21 PM
0

Women aren't drawn to reactive and emotional men. As far as personality goes (not far) they're drawn to proactive and level-headed men they can rely on
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/23 07:57 PM
13

Passivity is unattractive but being a stoic doesn't imply being passive
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/23 04:49 PM
-3

I suppose their main issue is that western men are too weak to properly impose limits on them and make them feel safe, protected and cherished. But I'm not a woman so idk get your pick among the following non-existent issues : gender gap, misogyny, Chad won't commit, Joe was mean to me today, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/23 11:38 AM
3

My god this comment section is dumb. Libido is correlated with things like testosterone, strength, manliness, etc. The only way you can significantly lower it is using chemical and biological means like you mentioned. But this has side effects that many men don't want.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/23 06:47 AM
2

Depends on how low the standards I guess
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 06:43 PM
21

Laugh all you want and I despise AI girlfriends, but the entire premise of civilizations is guaranteed sexual returns (ie a wife and children) in exchange for male investment in the society at large.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 06:05 AM

Housework maybe I'm not even sure but better emotionally? Men can be pretty garbage in this regard but with most women the common experience is that you can't show weakness ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 05:43 AM
8

People don't consciously rate others (well men do sometimes) but it changes nothing to what he said
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 12:57 PM
3

I think there's a guy on youtube who made a very decent chart about how this works. "hoe_math" I think he's called. Basically as a man you're put in a different box on a 2d chart with attraction as Y-axis (so looks, status, etc) and perceived ROI (return on investment) as X-axis. Personality matters for attraction insofar as it shows masculine traits (dominance, etc). It matters for ROI insofar as it increases her perception of what you're willing to give her (niceness, honesty, etc).
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 10:38 AM
7

Except that dating failure is prevalent among men to the point communities formed around it
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 06:54 AM
3

Of course it's unconscious and intuitive, just like 95% of women's behaviour. I mean from their POV it's just too enticing, the best of both worlds
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/23 08:05 AM

Thanks, your compliment means a lot to me
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/23 02:23 PM

I don't want increased risk? With women anyway you can never be sure of anything unless you go on full Shariah mode, which means 1) you're willing to enforce that 2) you actually can where you live, social context and all. I want neither 1 or 2 so my best option is to ensure I remain high-value and make clear that cheating ever so slightly means I'm out.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/23 02:23 PM

I would tell my GF that 90% of her "male friends" if she has any probably want to fuck her to some extent. I wouldn't push it so far as to isolate, manipulate and gaslight her, but I would tell her to be mindful of the male-female dynamics at play.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/23 11:20 AM
2

They're trying to equate a man rejecting a woman that's severely unhealthy (and lacks discipline, etc), which is basically the only criterion men have, to a woman rejecting a man for the most minute detail
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/23 06:32 AM
2

women regularly experience heinous abuse, are beaten, SA'd, severely verbally abused Lol yeah it totally happens as often as the occurences you mentioned for men. It's well known women don't get salty for anything and they certainly never complain about them either /s
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 06:02 AM
2

Yeah it's true, you can't just lift your way out of bad genes. It doesn't mean that muscle is cheap though
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 01:53 PM
34

I think you just completely extrapolated from the offhanded comment of a single (as in, only one) woman about a single man.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 12:15 PM

I can't tell if you're being sarcastic
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/23 06:17 AM

Bravo you've figured out the root cause of the issues in modern dating
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/23 06:14 AM

Men want sexual commitment from women. Hard to trust a woman who's had bazillions of partners before will commit to you. On the other hand women want resource commitment and body count doesn't factor (as much) in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/23 06:07 AM

It's basic evolutionary psychology and reproductive strategy. Women want resource commitment and men want sexual commitment
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/23 06:06 AM
1

"Guys, I know it's controversial, but please hear me out. There I go: I stand against racism and fascism! Phew"
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/23 05:53 AM
0

Those are by definition exceptional cases that need to be dealt with appropriately. Idk why people always bring those points when I'm clearly talking about comfort abortions
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 09:01 PM
5

I'd this Is this your first day having a conversation in English??? Bro, if you can't word your sentences properly it's not on me. It's the internet you have to be precise with your words. Besides you're super aggressive, so is it surprising I mistook your message as a personal call out?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 02:34 PM
5

I'm not a slob? And I'm not even unfortunate with my genes. But some people are.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 02:21 PM
4

That's true
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 01:12 PM
-2

Yeah it's not like this backlash occurs after decades of an invasive medical procedure destined to end potential lives being widely available. Let's not mention the fact that abortion is only "useful" if you are so irresponsible with your sexuality that you managed to unvoluntarily become pregnant in a time period where pills, condoms and contraceptive surgical procedures are cheap, ubiquitous, liberally distributed and socially accepted or even encouraged. But this backlash is too late anyway. …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 01:07 PM
1

Is it any surprising then women withhold sex even more since they can get resources for so "cheap"? One side is just better at bargaining nowadays.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 12:29 PM
4

Please give examples of female sexuality being controlled
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 12:20 PM
0

Just like men guard resources... M-F relationships are always in part transactional
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 12:19 PM
0

It's not that it's a bad deal, it's that it wouldn't work. While a collective ideal is enforced nobody even wonders if sacrificing oneself is a good deal: it's just the obvious thing to do. Once the collective ideal breaks down there's no going back. What will happen to us is a total breakdown of societal order bc of male frustration, divided population, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 12:17 PM
-1

The issue with this reasoning is that a society that favours women's expressed desires when it come to partnership is unsustainable. I'm sorry but it's the truth. Everybody knows and feels our current model is doomed and there's a reason for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 12:04 PM
15

Being unattractive is no one's fault, you didn't choose your genes it's just random. It would have been more accurate to say that life is unfair, but then again it's a truism at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 08:47 AM

Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 08:29 AM

Although your comment is 100% true, I think male disposability has a different definition. It means that men are (socially) viewed as disposable unlike women. It's the whole "10 dead women is a tragedy, 10.000 dead men is a statistic". It's linked to the fact that if all the men in a tribe but 1 die, he can still fuck all the women and the next generation will still be numerous. Although they would lack resources but they would at least exist. Whereas if all the women but 1 die then you're just …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 06:55 AM
1

Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/23 10:29 AM
0

They worked, but to even imagine they provided the largest share of the resources, or worked with the same intensity and physical hardship than men, is downright stupid. You really have to be a disconnected urbanite to think that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/23 07:25 AM
0

I'm talking to a wall. In fact, I'd prefer talking to a wall. I completely rejected your entire definition of a sex slave and recontextualized it but yeah keep up the cope. ​ Oh sweety pie, I am just as sarcastic in real life. This explains why you talk like a neurotic and resentful cat woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/23 07:23 AM
0

For women sex has always been transactional to some extent. If women expected to not withhold sex are slaves, then tell me, how do you call men expected to not withhold resources?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/23 06:55 AM
0

Isn’t that fun? No, stop with that Reddit sarcasm, it's obnoxious and that's probably not the way you behave in real life. ​ Marriage back then was built on things other than physical attraction & love. It was a contract meant to solidify wealth, ensure generational persistence, etc. The man probably didn't choose it much either, it would often be the two families arranging the marriage for convenience or to secure alliances. Marriages of love happened more frequently than we think, but I agree …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/23 06:45 AM
-1

Finally, someone with a source and credible material. In the second excerpt it does mention "forcible deflowering" but the low punishment is explained by the fact she was a slave; that's a different debate altogether. In the code of Hammurabi (mesopotamian law) it is said that raping a girl who was married or betrothed was a capital offence and punishable by death. The root issue of this whole thread is that you're trying to articulate and conflate an entire view of history around this single fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/23 06:36 AM
1

People working in rooms and requires to crunch numbers, file documents Lmao right bureaucrats and diversity managers were commonplace in 95% agrarian societies. You're just laughable. ​ Look it up yourself Yeah, I thought so. You in fact don't have any credible material. All you have are biased ideas, ideology and moral judgments.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/23 05:56 AM
0

Sweety Pie Lmfao did you actually me Sweety Pie? Am I on r/TwoXChromosomes or some shit? You're all so full of Reddit bullshit, legit impressive. ​ Rape in marriage "Rape in marriage" give me a break. You're all judging past history with modern standards. Women were expected to provide sex just as much as the man was expected to provide & protect his wife & children giving his life if necessary.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/23 05:53 AM
1

The head of every household was a man who had power over the women and children You say it like it's a bad thing. Someone's got to be in charge ​ the people underneath him had it worse That's incredibly false. This power you talk about came with burdens, responsibilities and duties. But this victim competition is disgusting anyway. Men and women always cooperated despite power dynamics in order to survive and, God willing, thrive. To reduce everything to this power dynamic and an oppressor/oppre…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/23 08:12 PM
-2

This is not a refutation, more a side observation. I can't believe one is expected to write essays to refute such absurd claims as women being sex slaves.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/23 04:36 PM
-3

Did you forget to take your pills? What a bunch oh histrionic bullshit. I'm glad real life women are not as dumb and full of ideology as Reddit women are. ​ There are thousands of historical accounts Please do share because I'm just about certain that women being raped was NOT a common occurence, and that it was severely punished by law as far as ancient mesopotomia. You see, our ancestors were more pragmatic; you can't build a stable society if everybody's daughter, mother or wife gets raped. ​…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/23 04:33 PM
4

This is just a distillate of radical feminist utter bullshit. Everybody had it rough back then.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/23 02:03 PM
1

Many men are leveling up but women's standards keep rising because again, they don't want someone who's good enough, they want someone who's better. They compare men and think like "I deserve someone in the top X%" But I don't want to make men sound like victim. Many of them are utter cucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/23 12:02 PM
1

What you said is true but doesn't run counter to what I said. Men opt out of dating bc they're fed up with entitled women, but also because at some point they don't have any viable option
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/23 12:00 PM
4

The truth is that marriage is like any other contract. People nowadays think that because you sign a piece of paper boom you're golden. Your piece of paper only has as much value insofar as people are willing to enforce it. If no one is shaming women for breaking this contract especially without a valid reason, and if this contract does not have a binding religious/supralegal value, then it's worthless. You're just renting each other out for an indefinite amount of time (usually until the woman …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/23 07:46 AM
6

Lmao that's even worse
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 06:54 PM
6

This "enjoyment" you're talking about is just a byword for "attraction", doesn't invalidate my point
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 06:54 PM
3

How the man views himself is up to him. From what you said however it comes as a logical conclusion that women view the average man as worthless in terms of romantic partnership
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 06:42 PM
6

Except men don't have the absurdly high standards women have. Makes a world of difference
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 06:39 PM
3

I get what you're coming from, but what does "wants to be in" mean? I don't think people back then hated their partners or even didn't want the relationship. It was just built on stuff other than physical attraction. This adds to the fact that everybody had lower standards anyway. Besides, at some point social norms are made to benefit the group and not individuals. I'm sure you'd agree that the current situation is untenable. Just to be clear I'm not advocating for unvoluntary marriages, but th…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 04:25 PM
8

Oh but it's not intentional, it's that women legit don't notice sub-7 men.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 02:52 PM
7

What's that got to do with anything?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 02:40 PM
7

Except if you're average she won't find you attractive by default. I think women being more free to choose has benefits. For one it pushes men to improve. But I'm not sure we're currently selecting for good traits, women are just rewarding good looks over more useful stuff. Besides the increased frustration from average men will at some point catastrophically damage social cohesion.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 02:38 PM
9

The more it goes the more I understand why families arranged marriages back in the day
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 02:24 PM
3

Of course but the idea that they view single as their best option over picking a normal but average dude really drives the point home.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 02:23 PM
12

I don't think anyone's brushing it off, but more and more males are getting jaded by the idea that the average girl will prefer being single over getting with an average guy
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 02:08 PM
16

Holy shit that's depressing, according to you the average men really is invisible and worthless
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 02:06 PM
1

Yeah which is why the unbrindled hypergamy of women is an issue
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 08:46 AM
1

I scrolled through the comments and my god... So much nihilism, amoralism and anti-life thinking. It's baffling
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 06:21 AM
1

If you're hyper stacked in either looks money or status it overwrites the rest that's true. Jack of all trades vs maxing out either of those three, both strategies work.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 05:55 AM
1

Yes, barring extremely serious issues
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 11:39 AM
1

I'm not sure I agree. Women have a baseline for both looks, status & money but above that your "score" is a compound of the three, IMO
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 11:38 AM
2

Yeah I know those blackpill ideas but it's just not true. Or, more accurately, not true enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 11:28 AM
2

Yeah a hell of a lot and a lot more than people think, especially so in our modern society. But it's not the only factor at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 11:27 AM
-1

Yeah except that's just physical attractiveness. It happens to be 95% of female attractiveness, but for males it's far from it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 11:22 AM
4

You can be NT but lack an avenue to meet women. This is the lot of many young men today and is in fact the main issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 09:17 AM
24

Women never really had a choice, they always followed what's socially and culturally valued. Mass contraception and consumerism encouraged childless women and here we are.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/23 09:55 PM
6

You're probably the man in the relationship lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/23 06:10 AM
6

Yeah except the big 5 went through a lot more scientific scrutiny and has studies backing it up
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/23 06:09 AM
3

Do men complain less about being used than women? There it's much better
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 10:28 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter