TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

plainwalk Archive

View 1 posts and 667 comments by plainwalk on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

plainwalk/r/MensRights27/09/17 10:45 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

"Unquantifiable truths" also known as "because I said so." If a claim can't be measured or reproduced, it's useless outside of religion. This whole "patriarchy" thing is a pillar of dogma the modern religion of feminism is based on.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 11:04 AM
7

Radical Feminism is the belief in the Patriarchy Theory. Almost every feminist today appears to be a radical feminist.
/r/MensRights17/06/26 10:01 AM
1

It is inconsistent, but not a huge issue if both would still qualify as statutory rape. Shoddy reporting/editing, however.
/r/MensRights15/06/26 01:45 PM
2

Isn't a mayor a position of authority? In most places, there is a different age of consent involving authority figures.
/r/MensRights15/06/26 12:16 PM
2

I believe all Western countries require companies to let their employees go vote. If they don't, they face massive fines. If you were denied the right to vote, lodge a complaint.
/r/MensRights26/05/26 02:14 AM
42

CBC had a piece on boys' difficulties in school. The bit was almost entirely talking to women (only one male teacher), never mentioned how few men can get into teaching resulting in a lack of role models for boys, and the last half was talking to feminists worried that if anything is done to help boys, then girls wouldn't do as well. It was disgusting.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 11:11 AM
4

I wish women rapists made the news. I never saw one article or report (in Canada) about Jade Hatt, but Brock Turner was nightly news.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 09:57 AM
3

Possibly, of course they'd ignore that gay men have the lowest incidences of IPV, lesbians the most.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 06:46 AM
1

Sounds like you're talking about corporations.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 02:37 AM
2

My first thought, too, but the wording implies two separate acts. Degrading is a different clause than the lying. I agree it should be worded differently.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 02:35 AM
8

95% are men.
/r/MensRights25/03/26 11:25 AM
9

If you place Elon Musk in a town of 500,000 people who earned nothing in a year, the average income of that town would be the same as the US average. A blanket "pay gap" is completely useless without externalities like overtime and job type accounted for. You can also guarantee that Musk, Bezos, Gates, et al are included in these studies. As stated, Musk alone can skew income averages by an insane amount.
/r/MensRights25/03/26 11:24 AM
1

Proof? Relevance? You're claiming women don't have to follow court orders if a man has more than one child?
/r/MensRights07/03/26 02:09 PM
2

You can't and be still be right. You're merely projecting your own feelings over everone else. PS:You just asserted what I can or can't do, and I didn't made an absolute claim. Hypocrite.
/r/MensRights06/03/26 02:39 PM
-1

Bull. You can't say that based on yourself anymore than I can claim it's generally left leaning.
/r/MensRights06/03/26 12:45 PM
2

2: Middle East, South and SE Asia, Africa, the US, parts of the Caribbean...
/r/MensRights06/03/26 12:43 PM
4

No? The loudest, maybe. Most gay men just want to able to live our lives in peace. Get married to a man, if we want to. Not lose our job if our boss finds out we're gay. Hold our partner's hand without being killed. You know, live.
/r/MensRights06/03/26 12:34 PM
0

Trump is not the party. Remember Cake-Gate? The GOP and their handlers are pushing anti-gay cases up to the USSC to try to repeal the gay marriage ruling.
/r/MensRights06/03/26 12:31 PM
1

Scott Lively is the most famous, but hardly the only one. Focus On the Family (Dobson) is also virulently anti-gay. https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/05/uganda-homosexuality-death-american-evangelical-groups
/r/MensRights06/03/26 12:28 PM
3

Yes, in most places. Then again, in some places laying a charge like that would result in death or imprisonment for both men. In civilised countries, it would AFAIK, be treated like any other case... if the officer receiving the complaint accepted it.
/r/MensRights05/03/26 11:34 AM
1

Depends. Which country? What sort of "right wing"? Traditional Conservatives generally want gay men to be killed, while Libertarians --actual ones-- don't care who you sleep with. Traditional Conservatives and some feminists both hate gay men (not manly enough and men who can't be manipulated with sex, respectively) so either broad definition of Right and Left have large portions who hate us. Vote on more than one issue and, most importantly, who it is. Don't get stuck on labels. Better yet, ref…
/r/MensRights05/03/26 11:29 AM
2

All penetrative sex is rape. Lesbian sex isn't. I'm gay, and have had gay men tell me that any gay sex beyond handjobs is rape because penetration is violence. And feminists claim that it's *women* who are taught to hate themselves?
/r/MensRights05/03/26 11:19 AM
0

Not in the US. Trump just cut food aid to children and almost half the country celebrated.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 02:50 PM
2

Not parents, fathers. A woman can surrender her child at firehalls, hospitals, police departments, etc, and not have to pay child support. A man has no choice at any point, including being underage, or otherwise raped.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 02:49 PM
1

I'm a "lefty", and no, I don't say that. There is no difference between a trad-con and a feminist when it comes to men's rights, and not all feminists are "lefty." TERFs are an example.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 02:38 PM
3

Yes, and everyone knows every single rape is reported, and every single rape is taken seriously by police. Funny that feminists believe that's true when men are victims or when comparing male victims of female criminals with female victims of male criminals. Never when just looking for stats on female victims. Truly funny.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 02:29 PM
5

You had the choice not to give birth, troll. You also have the choice to drop the baby off at any firehall, police department, or hospital. You had multiple choices I birth control and Plan B. You also had the choice to not have sex. And, yes, you could have ceded custody to the father. You only had obligations because YOU CHOSE to have them. Note, only obligations because women aren't forced to have responsibilities. At any point, women give up parental responsibilities, men can't.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 02:25 PM
3

Focus On the Family and the National Organisation of Women worked together to oppose changing Florida's alimony laws to be gender neutral. Men provide and women are blameless. Any change to disrupt this "natural order" is vehemently opposed by both.
/r/MensRights16/01/26 10:37 AM
2

Soc-Cons and Feminists are allies more often than enemies when it comes to men's rights.
/r/MensRights15/01/26 12:07 PM
3

Okay. So the father has the right to be present at birth, as that is in the best interest of the child. The father has the automatic right for a paternity test, as that's in the best interest of the child. In the case of a non-shared domicile, there is an automatic review of living conditions with the child going to the best provider, as that's in the best interest of the child. The mother can't give the child up for adoption without the father's consent and right to become sole caretaker -- and…
/r/MensRights15/01/26 12:02 PM
3

Women have the choice of not going through the birthing process. Three types of birth control (including no condom = no sex), Plan B, abstinence, and abortion. Men have no condom, and abstinence. Feminists always talk about "it takes two to tango" when it comes to child support, and claim "best interests of the child", but say the complete opposite when it comes to paternal rights or the child's best interests. Biology isn't fair. Pregnancy and birth don't give women the right to deny other peop…
/r/MensRights15/01/26 11:56 AM
1

Not closeted. They're squealing it out like a stuck pig.
/r/MensRights11/01/26 02:31 PM
2

Why are you so homophobic?
/r/MensRights11/01/26 02:30 PM
10

Women are less prone to any biological extremes... as a group. Fewer geniuses and mentally handicapped. Fewer top tier athletes and physically handicapped. They have a steeper bell curve, with far more "average" people than men, for good and ill.
/r/MensRights11/01/26 01:22 PM
5

I think "women and children first" should be argued in a way that women get, rather than point out how misandrist it is. The phrase equates women with children, incapable of doing anything for themselves, lacking in agency.
/r/MensRights11/01/26 01:19 PM
2

I'm a gay man. You're right, it IS impossible to do it correctly, and that's entirely the point. It's right out of the authoritarian playbook. Make the rules arbitrary and constantly changing so the subjects can never be sure they're right. It breeds fear and compliance, and it allows those with power the ability to come after you at any time for "breaking the rules." It doesn't matter who you are or what your intent is. It matters if the person with the soapbox decides to make an example of you…
/r/MensRights01/01/26 01:04 PM
1

Did I miss the title stating this applies to one country only? No one speaks English in Nigeria or India?
/r/MensRights01/01/26 12:52 PM
1

Yup. Two boxes should be 99% of the circle: wealthy and poor. The rest should be marked with an asterisk for situational and not ranked.
/r/MensRights01/01/26 12:49 PM
1

I (gay) lived next to a lesbianism couple with my room mate (straight). They were quite friendly until they found out we weren't a couple. They would, thereafter, run inside, lock the doors, and close the curtains every time they saw him. You'd think a guy with a gay roommate would automatically be "an ally."
/r/MensRights01/01/26 12:42 PM
2

If porn is so evil, then why are smut novels -- by and for women -- always ignored? It's porn. Yet, feminists always refuse to touch that genre. Video games with adult scenes? Misogyny. Sex videos? Denigrating and coercive. Prostitution? Slavery. Romance novels? Empowering.
/r/MensRights01/01/26 10:44 AM
6

Men don't complain about "not feeling safe" and then proceed to act in a way that reduces their safety (lack of situational awareness.) If you don't act responsibly, then you have no cause to complain when people don't take you seriously.
/r/MensRights23/12/25 12:42 PM
2

According to feminists, yes. It came about because a woman was whining the guy she slept with wasn't as rich as he let on.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 10:33 AM
10

Would they do the same to a woman? Almost certainly not. The staff was sexist and bigoted, and so are many commentors. It's disgusting how people think it's fine to assume any and every man is a pedophile.
/r/MensRights17/12/25 10:35 AM
1

If any form of deception -- from income to using a condom -- turns consensual sex into rape, then isn't this situation one where the man was raped? Your brother probably doesn't have the money to press charges for fraud and rape, though.
/r/MensRights17/12/25 10:18 AM
2

Why? Women can drop a baby off anywhere and never have to pay child support... or have the father's permission. This is no different.
/r/MensRights17/12/25 10:17 AM
2

Not all gay men like receiving... not that it makes any difference to your orientation. If you're straight, your straight. "Trying" only helps you figure out if you're slightly bi.
/r/MensRights17/12/25 10:15 AM
2

If any form of deception -- from income to using a condom -- turns consensual sex into rape, then isn't this situation one where the man was raped? She should be placed on the sex assault registry and jailed.
/r/MensRights17/12/25 10:12 AM
2

If any form of deception -- from income to using a condom -- turns consensual sex into rape, then isn't this situation one where the man was raped?
/r/MensRights17/12/25 10:10 AM
1

Really? It's not Democrats taking away your labour rights, taxing everything coming into the country (tariffs), or your right to defend food, air, water, or products. You're right that Republicans don't hate men; they hate everyone not a billionaire.
/r/MensRights15/11/25 12:24 PM
1

Free trade started with Reagan, Thatcher, and Mulroney. It was continued by Clinton and Cretein. It's a rich thing, not a party thing.
/r/MensRights15/11/25 12:21 PM
44

And how dishonist the stats are. Feminists say, and are likely correct, in saying police reports of rape of women are far lower than actually occur, but assume every single incidence of domestic violence or rape by women against men is both reported and leads to a conviction. This is despite women being far less likely of having charges pressed against them even with video evidence proving their guilt (Amber Heard).
/r/MensRights19/08/25 12:06 PM
75

Give the actual father custody. Giving birth shouldn't give someone a "get out of jail free" card. Is being raised by a crook in the best interest of the child?
/r/MensRights06/08/25 09:27 AM
3

Most crimes in the US are against a person or group of people. English Common Law (the basis for most of her colonies) counts most crimes as crimes against the State. Victims rarely get a say in whether charges are laid or not. I think it's preferable this way.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 09:40 AM
30

More like a warning to treat people with compassion and hospitality.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 12:20 PM
16

As a gay man, I wholeheartedly endorse this! We are talking about sexy, big men, right?
/r/MensRights02/05/24 11:27 AM
1

Christianity has more "research" backing it than feminism does. Both require adherence to the basic premise in order to progress in the studies (seminary or gender studies). Both require(d) passing the courses to have the "authority" and "background" to appropriately question the material. Both have extensive studies, papers, and writings on their subject that are referenced and sourced in other studies, papers, and writings by their peers... of course without questioning the underlying premises…
/r/MensRights02/05/24 10:03 AM
6

A good number would agree. White women aren't *really* white when it come to colonizing, the evil Patriarchy forced them to move. They're even more a victim than anyone else because of it, they had to leave home *and* their feelings were hurt by being associated with the evil colonizing white men. (/s if necessary)
/r/MensRights06/04/24 12:13 PM
4

Feminism is an ideology of equality in as much as Christianity is a religion of love and Islam is a religion of peace: in name only. It claims to be but is the opposite in action.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 12:22 PM
5

I got banned from r/atheism for criticizing feminism and comparing it to a religion.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 12:03 PM
8

In the creation of the first Caliphate, ie the very beginning?
/r/MensRights31/03/24 08:42 AM
1

Your phrasing implied women being raped was worse than being murdered... and that those cases occurred as often as the men being sent off to die (even if it were just to the village wall to prevent women from facing any danger at all.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 11:56 AM
2

What happened to the village men in your example? They were brutally murdered before the first woman was threatened.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 02:21 AM
3

That's a bad example. If a boy's shorts/pants were missing 1/6 of the leg length, then he would be sent home, too. I saw the CBC article on that a few years ago, too. If a girl hangs her arm by her side and the end of her fingertips marks the minimum length of her skirt/shorts in the school dresscode, then that is a very simple rule. If she needed to raise her shoulders and ball up her fists to not have her fingers extend beyond the hem of her shorts, then she was willfully violating the dress c…
/r/MensRights22/03/24 02:17 AM
8

Men Going Their Own Way
/r/MensRights18/03/24 03:50 PM
14

It sounds like you're saying only men can assault children. It's not that women can do wrong and be caught, but that it's just men pretending to be women, and of *course,* men are the source of all evil... Bull shit.
/r/MensRights17/03/24 10:48 AM
1

Probably, but considering boys mature slower, your case is more of an example of a power imbalance or possibility of manipulation.
/r/MensRights17/03/24 10:40 AM
77

Isn't it that way already... for men? In the USA and South Korea men don't get the full benefits of citizenship without "agreeing" to serve or actually serving, respectively and for example. Women in those countries are born with all the rights and privileges of citizens, while men need to be "Citizen Soldiers" to do so.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 11:42 AM
1

The latter happens. My brother needed his girlfriend's permission before his doctor would perform a vasectomy (Canada.)
/r/MensRights06/03/24 10:45 AM
7

I doubt it. It's about the State not wanting to provide welfare, and it's about what women want. If the rights of a child took primacy, it would be required for the father to be notified before birth, the father to be available shortly after birth to bond with the child, and default custody to be 50/50, all of which is not the case in virtually the entire Western world. In case of child support being paid, the receiving parent would be required to show the money is going to the benefit of the ch…
/r/MensRights06/03/24 10:42 AM
0

Rachel Maddow was brought to court over one word in one sentence in one piece. In context, it was obviously not literal. Tucker Carlson lied constantly. His company stated no sane person would believe *anything* he said. He's not a victim.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 03:29 AM
12

His body, his choice. And no, coming from a gay man, an intact penis is better in all aspects.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 10:54 AM
15

I think that's why, in most countries, violent crimes are "crimes against the State." It removes the victim from being pressured/attacked by the offender, their family, or their friends. It also stops this bizarre "compassion" the victim may for their attacker.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 11:51 AM
1

Are you forever single?
/r/MensRights02/01/24 10:45 AM
10

Oh, no. You have to vacuum the carpet... the same number of times. The chores don't double because there is an extra person. You add some more noodles to the same pot you were boiling anyway. In return, you aren't spending hours commuting, 40+ hours working, etc in exchange for... 25% more housework? If that much.
/r/MensRights29/12/23 11:53 AM
2

Zeus disagrees and doesn't want you speaking for him.
/r/MensRights25/11/23 02:21 PM
1

It is rape -- statutory rape. The definition you used is for adults (well, half of them anyway), and doesn't prevent the media from rightfully calling her a rapist.
/r/MensRights16/11/23 09:54 AM
3

Source?
/r/MensRights16/11/23 06:19 AM
4

Isn't three months juuust long enough to be common-law in some places? She probably would leave after three months, but with much more than she came with... or make him leave her loft.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 01:32 PM
11

I was called an incel for pointing out that a person was erasing victims of Hamas's attack by saying "1000 women and children were killed." I said it was 1000 men, women, and children. It doesn't take much to be called an incel.
/r/MensRights15/10/23 01:42 PM
21

So, you're saying it's fine for men to hit women if they don't use their full force? How... progressive of you? I guess? Why should anybody be allowed to hit anyone?
/r/MensRights15/10/23 10:59 AM
2

I thought the second image was a black screen to point out how there is no support (figuratively speaking) just for men.
/r/MensRights11/10/23 09:51 AM
6

Divisiveness? And you're here trying to make a gender issue into a race issue? The hypocrisy is real.
/r/MensRights06/10/23 01:20 AM
7

Are you talking about bots or girlfriends trying to make men buy them things? (Joke)
/r/MensRights05/10/23 09:51 AM
-23

Girls, on average, start puberty two years earlier than boys. A proper comparison should be an eleven year old girl.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 11:17 AM
23

And two of his accusers were, according to the judge, "conspiring to subvert justice." His other accuser (his producer) had a "corroborating witness" who was neither an employee of CBC at the time nor known to either party.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 01:25 PM
8

"Domestic violence against men is rare." The narrative is that men are almost never the victim of IPV, not just that it is less common. I'm not sure if the goal is to accurately capture the level of gender bias or to determine if it merely exists. Edit: the first line changes your entry: uncommon -> rare.
/r/MensRights29/08/23 11:42 AM
3

He did. He lost. The many courts he appealled to dismissed his cases because he had zero evidence beyond "I don't want to admit I lost." His lawyers are in trouble for conspiring to defraud the government, filing false documents, and conspiracy. Not for being lawyers. For committing crimes.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 01:19 PM
0

Donald Trump claims to be a billionaire. Why would he need the government to supply a lawyer? He's also not in trouble for the sixty cases he filed questioning the results, he lost 59 of them, he's in trouble for fraud and a coup.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 09:49 AM
-9

Cons remove workplace safety regulations resulting in even higher rates of death and major injury at work. Cons are outright killing men.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 09:54 AM
-4

Trump has worked less than Bernie, unless you count committing fraud or screwing over men working in construction. Conservatives want working class men to be slaves and work in places with no safety regulations. See Texas removing water breaks for workers in a heat wave, or Repub states allowing child labor in factories. At least Democrats fix the economy and don't raise the deficit the way Repubs do. 1/3 of the debt was added by Trump.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 09:50 AM
16

Source? Sounds like an interesting read.
/r/MensRights29/07/23 08:20 AM
1

Which churches allow women to wear gold? All of those churches ignore the inconvenient sections of the Epistles.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 09:36 AM
4

Bad bot
/r/MensRights06/07/23 09:52 AM
17

Yes, but Jesus said nothing about it. Leviticus and 2nd Timothy (I believe) do, but in both cases they are also in sections that most Christians ignore, like wearing mixed fabrics or forbidding women from wearing gold. If a Christian honors all of the restrictions in those books, then I can respect, if disagree, with their stance. The loudest "Christians" really need to focus on being like Christ rather than paying attention to other people (which Jesus had also talked about.)
/r/MensRights05/07/23 01:28 PM
3

If breasts aren't sexual, then neither is the scrotum. You can't see the balls because they're in the bag.
/r/MensRights28/06/23 09:34 AM
6

...That's what he's paraphrasing. "My body, my choice," etc. He's pointing out the blatant hypocrisy of feminists when it comes to men trying to get any reproductive rights or rights to bodily autonomy. Feminists believe they're entitled to dictate men's lives.
/r/MensRights09/06/23 09:43 AM
16

Surveys? Half the marketing surveys ask the gender of the respondent and if they completely, partially, or don't at all control the spending in the household. It's a well established fact women control the spending in most households, and always has (outside major purchases).
/r/MensRights08/06/23 08:02 AM
1

Then these people need to become more secure in themselves. Why live your life second guessing how walking down the street, or just interacting, with someone you care about is taken by random strangers? It's time men just stop and stand up for ourselves. We have the right to be fathers and care for our kids. We have the right to be friends with other men. We have the right to be good brothers, cousins, sons, or grandparents. We deserve no less.
/r/MensRights07/06/23 09:35 AM
1

Good ridance.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 01:49 PM
2

I'm mistaken for being straight constantly. Most gay men are if they aren't flaming queens. Who gives a fuck? It's no one else's business unless I choose to make it their business. I'm also not commenting on the men in question; I'm commenting on societies that makes being openly gay a risk to employment, friendships, and safety. If that wasn't an issue, why would anyone care any more than they'd care if someone thought their cousin or sibling was their partner if they were walking down the stre…
/r/MensRights06/06/23 11:02 AM
0

That's not what the above comment is talking about. It's stating that men are refusing to be friends with other men because some random stranger might think they're partners. That's paranoia based on rampant societal homophobia.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 10:57 AM
-1

If homophobia wasn't a problem, then it wouldn't be an issue.
/r/MensRights05/06/23 12:16 PM
3

It's almost impossible to find a good story without romance being shoehorned in, often very poorly.
/r/MensRights05/06/23 12:15 PM
-2

If the woman doesn't know him, what the hell does it matter what she thinks? If she does know him, then she'd know they're just friends. If homophobia wasn't so rampant, then this paranoia wouldn't exist.
/r/MensRights05/06/23 12:12 PM
9

I made a comment about this in another post. It is women fetishizing gay men, or m/m sex. In Japan, there is a category of graphic novel called yaoi which is gay romance, and is overwhelmingly written by women for women. A feature of this is one of the men could be replaced by a woman with little change to the story, and has virtually no similarities to the experiences of gay men. Gay men have gotten tired of this and made their own category called Bara, by men for men , hough the men in the art…
/r/MensRights05/06/23 12:09 PM
7

Depends on where those two men are. In much of the world, the gay man would be killed or imprisoned. Even in parts of the States he'd be putting his life at risk. Neither would receive much support for mental health.
/r/MensRights05/06/23 11:16 AM
6

I'm all for helping people in need, which is why these programs should be based on need, not demographics. If a segment of society is truly disadvantaged, then need-based programs would end up helping that demographic more simply because there are more in need. The daughter of a billionaire black family does not need assistance getting into university, while an impoverished white boy raised in a fishing village in rural Newfoundland devasted by the collapse of the fishery does. Currently, the gi…
/r/MensRights26/05/23 10:52 AM
21

Gay man as well. You can easily tell which gay stories are written by women, too. One of the men is very effeminate, filling "traditional" female roles, and could be swapped out for a woman without changing much of the story. If you look at Japanese Manga, the "yaoi" category is dominated by the above type of fiction by women, so much so gay mangaka had to create a "bara" category for men by men.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 07:07 AM
7

Men are human. Women are human. Humans can be good, evil, or as the overwhelming majority of us are, a little of both. I like to think most of us have a bit more good than evil.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 09:48 AM
1

Puritans. The even loonier Brits who thought England was a cesspool of vice and inequity. They went to the US to set up a theocracy.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 09:10 AM
2

I don't keep a log of reports where an innocent man has been arrested for calling in. They occassionally pop up, typically in media I don't like (Daily Mail, for example.) I don't know why you would consider arresting an individual based on gender to be fair, regardless of who called or who is the victim (say bearing visible wounds.) That is the opposite of fair. The Duluth model is administered at the enforcement level, not the judicial level, and serves to remove one of the parties from the sc…
/r/MensRights09/05/23 05:50 AM
76

And you think men report? Most states will arrest the man, even if he's the victim, thanks to the Duluth model and feminist propaganda.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 11:30 AM
3

That's non-binary. Transgender is about moving from the gender you were born as to the one you feel is yours.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 10:08 AM
32

Dylan is a man in a dress. "Trans" is from "transitioning," and Dylan has made it perfectly clear they don't intend to. It's purely an act for that one. I support those who actually are trans and seek to become who they feel they truly are.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 09:14 AM
13

The only problem I have with Dylan is she screams "fake" to me. She was a Broadway actor before this, will not take hormone blockers, get surgery (other than face), or do anything to transition. Her videos are so terrible that they could be a parody of the stereotypical "girly girl" a la *Legally Blonde." She's probably the worst person possible to represent the Trans community, the broader LGBT community, or even women writ large. Honestly, I'm 90% sure this is just an act for money and/or a su…
/r/MensRights18/04/23 11:06 AM
3

Then what do you say about women committing violent crimes but receive lower sentences, if any? Or men receiving high sentences for non-violent crimes? Or innocent men going to jail simply because a woman accused him of a crime? This is about equality before the law, not demanding violent criminals be set free. Edit: though it's rather telling you assumed as such, and that all men in jail are there for committing violent crimes.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 12:32 PM
1

Go back further. The Catholic church took over the record keeping, but it was done by the Roman government, the Japanese lords, the Sultans, etc. In some cases, such as the Israelites in the OT, it was a business contract. The Western European example seems to be an exception and not the rule.
/r/MensRights14/04/23 10:39 AM
1

Marriage is a legal contract, and always has been. Religion has just inserted itself into the matter, as it has with birth records (baptism) and death (funerals). The state has need to know of such matters (for taxes, in case of marriage, demographics, schools, etc), churches do not.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 01:36 PM
7

There needs to be an active way of phrasing this. A female raping a male causing a pregnancy isn't "impregnated by" as if she were a passive agent in the process. She forced fatherhood onto a child, he didn't force motherhood onto her.
/r/MensRights07/04/23 09:56 AM
3

If Russia stopped invading other countries, like they did to Georgia, their neighbours would be less eager to join NATO to protect themselves. This is all on Putin.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 09:50 AM
-5

I thought they didn't support Trump? You know, the one bragging about sexually assaulting women?
/r/MensRights25/02/23 09:54 AM
0

Dick/cunt. Bastard was applied to men as it disallowed inheritance and used to reduce their ability to produce/acquire income. The whole "men are only worth as much as their wallet holds" type of insult. Edit: it's meaning has changed, but is still primarily aimed at men, now attacking personality.
/r/MensRights16/02/23 04:31 AM
0

I've always seen it as an attack on a the gender's "value." A bastard can't/couldn't inherit the family wealth or property, and had limited income potential, while a female dog (bitch) can't produce heirs or manage the estate's staff.
/r/MensRights15/02/23 10:22 AM
-4

It is a gendered slur, just like bastard. If one is taboo, then the other should be, too.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 10:20 AM
26

"What would you say you do here?" If these people can't haul the hoses, carry people, break open doors, or anything else, then what is left? Driving the truck and sitting around while everyone else risks their lives? Watch people die while she does nothing?
/r/MensRights20/01/23 10:48 AM
15

I have seen anti-LGBT comments on this sub, but not posts.
/r/MensRights19/01/23 11:35 AM
4

And women can choose to be married with four children to get excempted from income tax for the next forty years or pursue a career in their 20s and pay. Their choice. Men receive no benefit if they marry and have four children, even if they have to work in a job that destroys their body in order to support five dependants.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 10:30 AM
2

Good bot
/r/MensRights08/01/23 12:28 PM
1

Read beyond the first paragraph. I pointed some out that you used. You are trying to control men's bodily autonomy. Women can still choose to continue the pregnancy (to give up for adoption or care for the child) or abort. You just don't like men having any rights.
/r/MensRights03/01/23 03:17 PM
1

If a child is raped and becomes a father, he has no say in the matter. A girl (usually) can get an abortion and not be a mother. A man too inebriated to consent has no say in the matter; a woman does. A woman who made a bad decision can choose not to become a mother; a man has no say in what the next 18 years of his life entails. A woman has control over her destiny beyond celibacy or parenthood; a man does not. This is grotesquely unfair, and you'll find the arguments against paper abortions to…
/r/MensRights02/01/23 09:06 AM
1

Probably the vitriol directed at GT, which almost never has anything to do with MR, but her environmental activism.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 08:53 AM
1

The responses seem to lean that way, but the initial comment spoke to the very existence of gay media.
/r/MensRights29/12/22 11:35 AM
23

The right to know if you are a father, and to know if the child someone is claiming is yours actually is yours. The right to be assumed to be an equal in care of your child (teachers/doctors not demanding to speak to the child's mother, or -- if they do -- to demand to speak to the father if he's not there). To not be called a pedophile if you are with your child without a woman "chaperoning" you. The right to be treated as a rape victim under the same circumstances a woman would be (may be more…
/r/MensRights29/12/22 11:16 AM
1

Ah, mixed you up with the other response, you know the one I did call a bigot. Why were you saying I called you a bigot when I hadn't? Your comment makes no sense. Don't like it, don't look at it. Taking something's mere existence as a personal affront is bigotry.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 01:57 AM
1

Yes, as long as gay men can pursue our own way unmolested. Being called "groomers" or "disgusting" or having people say they hate people who are gay or like gay literature/art is not being unmolested. I never said I wanted to alter existing IPs either, the topic was yaoi/bara manga, which is self contained IP.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 12:11 PM
1

I don't demand changes to existing IPs. I oppose it. I want new characters. Men who just gappen to be gay; ones who don't flounce around calling women "girlfriend" and tossing glitter on everything. In most films, especially action ones, it wouldn't even make sense to do more than reference tge character having a boyfriend or some such. I put my response to the other person up as well. I don't care if people don't want to read gay-focused work. I care when they say it's disgusting or hate people…
/r/MensRights23/12/22 12:08 PM
1

I'm not calling you a bigot for not wanting to read them; I'm calling you a bigot for hating the medium and it's fans, as well as saying it disgusts you. It's existence does not qualify as being "forced" on you.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 11:53 AM
-10

And bigots disgust me. Don't like it don't look at it.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 02:21 PM
-11

... and what is wrong with gay graphic novels? The only problem I have with yaoi is it's written by women, for women, and one of the guys can almost always be replaced by a girl with no change to the story.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 12:11 PM
2

They hired an entirely new workforce in the last few weeks? How would a new hiring policy change the race of someone who has been working there for 30-50 years? Demographics change, but it takes time to filter through workplaces, unless it has a very high turn over.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 11:51 AM
60

Shouldn't the majority of the population be the majority of the workforce?
/r/MensRights15/12/22 02:01 PM
5

One of those demographics chops at bits, but the phrase is "champing at the bit," it's about horses.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 02:44 PM
41

Can we get some men-only shelters, then? Any?
/r/MensRights12/12/22 02:06 PM
1

No shit. QAnon and MAGA are following the same playbook of creating an "other" to paint as subhumans acting to destroy "public order," society, and whatever else will sell to rile up a fascist mob. They want violence and dead gay men.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 01:10 PM
8

It's all about labels -- and fitting in the labels -- or finding a way to score "victim" points. Individuality is unwelcome. There's also a group of people claiming to be "leaders" in each community that unleash vicious attacks on anyone who disagrees with them or their dogma, which is always feminist dogma. The "normal" person who just happens to be gay, bi, or a lesbian (the trans have started their own community which is even worse), is stuck between this toxic feminist LGBT culture claiming …
/r/MensRights10/12/22 03:25 AM
11

Oh, the hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 03:12 AM
3

More a theology. Churches can make lots of money.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 12:35 PM
3

It's a recessive trait in women; they need the genes on both chromosomes. It's dominant in men; we only need it on one. If a woman is balding, all of her sons will bald, and it's likely most of her gandsons will, too. Edit: from what I read. I'm not an expert.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 11:22 AM
3

Are you saying vigilante justice or creating our own shelters?
/r/MensRights07/12/22 12:59 PM
2

See: Herschel Walker.
/r/MensRights29/11/22 12:49 PM
7

If liars were punished, then more people would be believed when they came forward. A girl can only cry wolf so many times before the immediate response is doubt.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 02:35 PM
3

One or the other. I hate hypocrisy, but the male form is a work of natural art.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 02:08 PM
2

That applies to the men, too, but men only have the condom or abstinence. This is still the party with 95% control blaming the 5% for what happens.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 03:13 AM
21

You mean the one with control over virtually every form of birth control and complete control over the reproductive process?
/r/MensRights09/11/22 01:58 AM
0

Says the guy who manufactured the whole thing inside their head. You interpreted a statement of someone encountering a few supremacists as an entire religion being supremacists. That's on you, and shows you cannot accept a single person of your religion as being viewed as less than perfect. That's you being a supremacist. You are a Hindu supremacist and are projecting your hatred on others. I've met many lovely Hindu people; you are not. You are untouchable and repulsive.
/r/MensRights04/11/22 02:14 PM
0

Lol, you can't read and are simply a racist bigot. Edit: Nah, I checked your comment history. You are a Hindu supremacist.
/r/MensRights04/11/22 02:23 AM
0

Where the hell did I say she was a Hindu? For fuck sakes, read what I wrote, and get off your high horse!
/r/MensRights03/11/22 01:32 PM
0

Aaaaand how does that contradict with what I said? I said I had no personal experience with them and there are likely some/many. It is the same thing you just said, other than tying theocratic regimes to supremacist/racist ideologies.
/r/MensRights03/11/22 09:29 AM
2

As the other person said, that is no true Scotsman. Conservative traditionalism is fighting environmental protections and safety standards in mining and forestry in Canada (what I know more of) and is working to shut down any sort of union protections in Canada and the States. That is putting men's lives in danger, and has killed men in BC. I strongly support unions, which is more left, as well as social programs like Medicare, employment insurance, and retraining opportunities in the event of j…
/r/MensRights01/11/22 12:20 PM
1

Perhaps she was the problem, not him. Perhaps he'd be a great father. It's not your call to make, and it shouldn't have been hers.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 12:06 PM
0

I never said she was. I said I met Hindu supremacists. There are probably Sikh supremacists, Muslim supremacists, etc in/from India, but I haven't met any. My comment was the racism against non-Indians isn't all that surprising.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 12:01 PM
1

I never said she was.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 11:59 AM
100

I've met great Indians, and I've met plenty of Hindu supremacists who view any non-Indian as subhuman, particularly Africans. Yeah, this doesn't surprise me.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 09:32 AM
17

Then she shouldn't have the child, the father should. If neither believe they can raise the child, then look at adoption. She is kidnapping and selling off a father's child.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 09:29 AM
7

Rightism is evil and so is conservative traditionalism. It is the source of the "disposable male." It enslaved generations of men in unsafe mines, factories and construction sites with no protections, no rights, and no concept of time off or work weeks. It is the enemy of men. It was unions (the left) that started all workplace protections, with men dying in literal fights against thugs hired by their bosses, to give their sons a better future. Fuck traditional conservatives.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 11:24 AM
44

There are two groups of "real victims": the victims of rape and the victims of those who pretend to have been raped. Only one can get justice based on a single witness and no evidence. Perhaps both should be treated the same in the court of law -- require evidence of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
/r/MensRights26/10/22 01:13 AM
34

Perhaps someone shouldn't be sent to jail based on one person's word and no evidence, then.
/r/MensRights26/10/22 01:08 AM
11

The argument that "The Patriarchy" is a valid scientific theory because feminists in university cite papers written by other feminists (with no reproducable research or independently verified research), is no more valid than Catholic theology. Both start with a conclusion and seek to prove it. Both ignore outside evidence. Both venerate martyrs of the faith/cause. The difference in the two is that you can question Catholic dogma without graduating from the seminary, and Catholicism is far older …
/r/MensRights21/10/22 02:01 AM
31

I only find it frustrating that women complain dress codes are sexist against them, when they have more freedom, or when they scream "oppression" when they get in trouble for not adhering to the far more lax codes
/r/MensRights17/10/22 12:57 PM
5

It is illegal in France to get a paternity test without the mother's permission. Case and point.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 01:06 PM
2

Yes. 100% the same.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 01:06 PM
1

All Catholic priests believe Catholicism is the one true religion. They have a millenium of academic research cited by other Catholic priests verifying it. There is no difference between the two, as both start with a "truth" and do research designed to prove it. These "studies" are not reproducable and have no value.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 12:33 PM
21

This isn't new. Miller-Gearhart (Future is Female author) said virtually the same in the 80's and Julie Bindel called for concentration camps for all men and boys decades ago.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 01:13 AM
2

The difference between radical feminism and other forms of feminism? Radical feminists believe in the "Patriarchy." Radical feminism is the dominant form of feminism.
/r/MensRights09/10/22 02:10 AM
3

There were multiple, different, allegations. It should be 2-4 years per allegation.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 10:44 AM
1

Specifically? No. Generally? Yes.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 09:20 AM
1

No. Subscribing the same agenda to a group who's whole existence is based on that agenda is not a cop out. Do we expect feminists to no longer care about women? Christians to start worshipping Satan? Environmentalists to throw crude-oil dumping parties? It's extremely rare for political parties to change a fundamental plank of their platform, and never the core platform.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 02:21 AM
1

How? A party is not a race, nor is a fascist leader.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 02:12 AM
1

Yes, please regurgitate QAnon conspiracy talking points, and encourge me to join your qult.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 02:11 AM
-7

Why not talk about Mussolini? It's his supporters and familiy that founded the party. It's key to the subject, even if it is inconvenient to those trying to pretend there is nothing fascist in a party founded by fascists and run by ideological descendants of the OG fascist.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 09:51 AM
-7

Mussolini was the origin of the term fascist and it's his party that won in Italy. It's very literally a fascist party.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 09:46 AM
6

The other comment missed Sally Miller Gearhart, author of The Future - If There Is One - Is Female. She also calls for a genocide of all but a breeding stock of men. The title nay seem familiar, as it's where the Future Is Female paraphernalia came from. This is not fringe feminism, it is core feminism.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 08:08 AM
18

I would want men only swim time. Your assumption is sexist; you assume all men are insatiably drawn to women at all times, and cannot possibly bear to be separated from the "fairer sex" for a second. Look back at the YMCA. It had men only swim times because not everyone could afford swim suits. There are many reasons someone may not be able to, or feel comfortable, swim. Having a women only time is perfectly reasonable... as long as the same consideration is provided for men.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 12:32 PM
14

It is about gender. A service is unequally provided to genders. Provide time for men to swim without women; orthodox Jews aren't permitted to see women is such little clothing.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 12:25 PM
10

No, the pervs just won't go during the women's hours. They can't perv on the men if the men aren't there.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 12:21 PM
2

Men's rights is not a place to be posting racist comments.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 08:50 AM
1

I'm complaining about the hypocrisy. Which you keep ignoring every time I point it out to you. That is strange, also strange how you never answer the question. How would people, plural, react if Jasmine was played by a white woman? Would the blow back be more, less, or equal to Ariel being played by a black woman? Would people dismiss it as "Who cares? It's a fictional character," as you are?
/r/MensRights27/09/22 05:15 AM
2

That flies counter to your previous comment.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 01:01 AM
3

It is. I'm a gay man. "Gay" being the adjective and "man" being the noun. Not "man gay" or "male gay."
/r/MensRights26/09/22 10:51 AM
2

Thank you for being there for us.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 10:48 AM
2

And, again, how would people react if today the fictional charater of Jasmine was played by a white woman? I know you love hypocrisy, but what is the answer?
/r/MensRights26/09/22 10:40 AM
6

Yes, and what would the reaction be if Jasmine was played by a white character?
/r/MensRights23/09/22 09:18 AM
2

Ah, yes, the refrain of cultists and conspiracy nuts. Source/proof, or you've proven you are the one with their head up their ass.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 07:20 AM
2

Except that the term of "victim blaming" is thrown at every mention of reasonable precaution, and countered with "women should be able to walk down the street naked at any time of day without worrying." Well, yes, but you are an idiot. This is what was being said in the comments above.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 08:17 AM
15

The issue I have is it's almost entirely the men in the black community that are at risk, and white men are more likely to be killed than black women. It's far more a gender issue than a race issue.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 12:38 PM
-16

Well, one is an issue at a community/individual level, and the other is about overthrowing governments. Slightly different scales.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 12:32 PM
15

That's why they said "conflated." Saying, "walking in this section of town late at night," is often called "victim blaming" if you tell that to a woman. It's met with "you should be telling men not to rape, and not me to take care!"
/r/MensRights15/09/22 10:18 AM
5

You apparently didn't look it up. His friend, a woman, made it and he wore it to promote her business. Who are you to tell her, a woman, what she can wear or have her creations wear? Misogynist. Edit: there is obviously some jest in there, but it is very hypocritical. If men can't tell women what to wear, then women can't tell men what to wear. I've also seen women walking around in less clothing than those characters on a near daily basis. Asses hanging out of the bottoms of shorts that have le…
/r/MensRights08/09/22 11:19 AM
2

Would a nation of another ethnicity celebrate having no men of the majority and/or indigenous population represented in the upper echelons of the government?
/r/MensRights08/09/22 05:34 AM
4

Yes, but those contracts are as valid as prenups: only as reliable as the judge who hears the case.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 01:54 PM
150

I'm gay and agree. I'm not a woman in a man's body, I'm not some hybrid, nor anything else. I'm a man that happens to be attracted to other men. I've never understood why denying this is supposed to "liberate" us, or make us "more in touch with who we are," any more than denying our sexuality.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 11:24 AM
2

When I was looking for work, in Canada, there was government provided day care for single mothers so they could job search. Specifically mothers named and the program solely contained female pronouns.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 02:34 PM
7

Sorry, I don't live your life. I have my own. That involves working in hospitality. That deals with customers. That you need to be friendly to. I guess in your world men can't work in public facing jobs. So, who's the sexist person?
/r/MensRights29/08/22 10:35 AM
14

We are. I work in hospitality.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 02:55 AM
-1

Not your business.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 08:33 AM
5

No, you can't. The suicide rate for boys forced into gay conversion therapy is astronomical. You can lie to yourself, you can pretend, but you will never be happy. The attraction remains, and you'll feel guilt every single time. If OP is bi, he can just write off women. He could look for a fuck buddy if he doesn't have an emotional attraction to men, too.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 11:24 AM
5

I fuck men and I care. 😘
/r/MensRights25/08/22 11:16 AM
29

It just sounds like she didn't want to admit she was a serial rapist/groper.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 08:29 AM
34

"It's not 'your' kitchen, it's 'our' kitchen. I have as much right to cook as you."
/r/MensRights24/08/22 08:23 AM
6

None of the news networks are based in Hollywood. Fox and ABC are in New York, CNN is in Atlanta.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 11:01 AM
3

Who?
/r/MensRights12/08/22 01:24 PM
10

Why should he give up to an evil monster, with a decaying, incompetent army, that wants to genocide his people? The only reason there is still a war is because no Russian patriot has put a bullet between Putin's eyes, yet.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 07:12 AM
21

I've met both. Awesome lesbian coworker, and then lesbian neighbours that would literally run inside and lock their doors when they saw my straight roommate.
/r/MensRights03/08/22 10:58 AM
-1

Democratic People's Republic. Google it. Any government that puts words like that in their name is usually the opposite of what it claims.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 09:18 AM
1

Isn't that guy constantly on Tucker's show? Not exactly unbiased. Rachel Maddow has an editorial show, and never claims to be otherwise. OAN sued her over one sentence in a piece showing that OAN constantly runs Russian propaganda; they never disputed that, but that they weren't paid by the Kremlin. The line being: "really literally is paid Russian propaganda." That is easily understood to be exageration. You are right that she was taken to court before Tucker Carlson. The dates I saw were for t…
/r/MensRights01/08/22 08:24 AM
1

The sources I found put Tucker Carlson doing it a year before her.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 03:29 AM
1

That's the Tucker Carlson defence. Fox "News" went to court over Tuck's constant stream of lies, and said only idiots would believe him.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 07:18 AM
6

Good bot
/r/MensRights21/07/22 07:39 AM
6

If you've never been the victim of every possible crime, then how do you know?
/r/MensRights21/07/22 01:14 AM
4

If you drive intoxicated and kill someone, then you get charged. She chose to drink, knowing what had happened before, and she be held fully accountable in a court of law.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 01:12 PM
7

Then true feminism is like true communism: it exists only on paper and has never been practiced in the real world.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 10:45 AM
8

Trans-man is a woman transitioning to a man. It takes me a while to work it out, too. Likely still had a woman's equipment but looked like a man when dressed.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 01:15 PM
2

That's exactly what I was saying? "Were" and "wif" were the gendered portion, "man" was the suffix and denoted a person related to the task or object. Chair-man, a person who occupied the chair (in charge of the meeting, as opposed to ones who occupied the benches along the table.) Fire-man, the person who dealt with fires.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 09:28 AM
15

Men don't have that right. Circumcision.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 02:19 AM
7

No, it is Germanic. 'Wereman' was a male person, 'werewolf' a male wolf, 'wifman (where 'wife' comes from) means female person. Man just meant person or human and was gender neutral.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 02:11 AM
4

Scrotums aren't sexual. They just hold the testes, which are sex organs. Free the sac!
/r/MensRights06/07/22 02:02 AM
-3

Not true. Breasts are revolting.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 02:01 AM
3

Complete opposite here, but would love to be intact. Any partner I've had that was intact felt a lot better; no discomfort even with minimal lube.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 01:53 AM
5

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/nationalpost.com/health/ontario-newborn-bleeds-to-death-after-family-doctor-persuades-parents-to-get-him-circumcised/wcm/9227263e-5d3f-40fa-8918-97cbe1d66173/amp/ Now you have.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 08:52 AM
3

That's exactly what feminists tell men when financial abortions are discussed. "Keep it in your pants if you don't want to be a father." 💀💀💀
/r/MensRights28/06/22 08:28 AM
3

Which means it isn't a thing in western countries. Even then, it's illegal (in the UK and Canada, for sure) to send a girl "back home" to get it done.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 08:22 AM
1

Where did he say all white men are alike?
/r/MensRights28/06/22 08:10 AM
10

Ask gay boys in religious households about the first half, hell, just look at stats. Mothers do not love their children unconditionally. That is BS propogated by feminists and their social conservative allies.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 07:54 AM
11

Nothing like taking your frustrations on your partner over something he had nothing to do with. You seem to be in favour of abusive relationships, as long as it's the woman being abusive. Don't even try to whitewash this away. A "sex strike" is literally an attempt to punish men or force men to comply with a womans wishes. If a man withheld all his money and gifts, would you think it was fine? Do you think wives own their husbands? It's his money.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 07:50 AM
0

Don't view orientation as 0 or 1, but 1-100 with 50 being fully bisexual. Most men are probably around 30, straight but willing to be a little flexible in the right situation. Very few men are 1, men are a complete turn off (and theoretically they don't find looking at themselves exciting). Even fewer men are 100, with women being a complete turn off. The world made a bit more sense to me when I started to look at orientation that way.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 07:41 AM
1

"Rules for thee but not for me." I don't oppose abortion, I want men to be able to choose if they want to be a father just like women do. That is verboten for feminists, and demonstrates the repulsive hypocrisy and sexism inherant to the ideology.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 10:36 AM
2

Is that not exactly what you just said?
/r/MensRights25/06/22 03:38 AM
32

Some areas? The entire bottom is some area, I suppose. Life expectancy, victims of violent crime, suicide, homelessness, discrimination in the legal system, no reproductive rights, de facto no rights as a father, education outcomes, societal supports... Feminism looks at the top 0.01% and claims that represents the entirety of men, and ignore the bottom 30%. Edit: the remainder only exists when useful for them.
/r/MensRights21/06/22 07:01 AM
73

Justice for Amber Heard would see her in jail.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 04:26 AM
16

Originally -- way back in 2008. It was sexist, meant to paint an entire gender with a single brush for something both genders do (watch a man try to do housework anywhere near a woman for fabulous femsplaining), and still is a sexist word meant to shut down any discussion.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 07:41 AM
3

Gods are also well defined. Doesn't make them real. "The Patriarchy" was created by radical feminists to dump everything they don't like into one category and brand as "the Enemy" to rail against and blame for all ills. It is the Satan in their religion/ideology.
/r/MensRights10/06/22 11:52 AM
36

Agreed. I'm also not your sister, your girlfriend, an "honourary woman", an expert on make-up, or want to hear your gossip. I'm a man who likes men. Our interests do not align. Feminism does not help me, nor does it make us natural allies. It is quite the opposite when feminism attacks me and my (if I had one) partner.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 07:51 AM
1

Seperate but "equal" has never been equal. Likewise, laws change. That's kind of what we're here for. Changing laws so they apply equally to men and women. Edit: specific instance of civil union not being equal- gay men being denied access to their spouse in care because they aren't married and "policy states" only someone married to the patient is allowed in.
/r/MensRights06/06/22 12:46 PM
-1

Biblically, marriage was defined as a contract of sale between two men, where a man could own as many wives as he could afford. Mormons defined it that way until very recently, and some still do. Other cultures still do. You are cherry-picking the definition you want, when gay marriage doesn't affect you in the slightest. Don't want to marry someone of your gender? You don't have to.
/r/MensRights06/06/22 02:23 AM
0

How is $5mil a lot? How much is it compared to one 'Pirates' movie role? Her lies cost him far more than that.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 06:18 AM
19

...? So do men.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 10:46 AM
49

I definately know you sound like a troll trying to paint MRA as sexist misogynists. Some women want kids; some don't.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 08:49 AM
2

The current education system, from pre-k on through, has been designed around the average girls level of readiness for learning and method of learning. It's not a stretch to think that it'd lead to better outcomes for them.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 10:03 AM
14

It was the feminists who were most against the gay rights in the beginning. It was called the ultimate form of misogyny. Why would defending men by homophobic when gay men are men who like men? The flamboyant members of our community are a minority. The "bears" are more representative of the community than the "queens," it's just that the queens are louder and more visible.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 02:16 PM
1

I don't know. I've thought about it, but even if every woman is required to name the father on the birth certificate, do we then spend unknown amounts of money tracking him down and running paternity tests? What if it was a (drunken) one night stand and neither gave their real name? How can we prove the truth of the statements? It is an aspirational goal, but one I don't think can be achieved in every circumstance.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 09:47 AM
2

Reading your later comment helped clarify this one. I agree. A potential father should not be able to tell a potential mother to (not) abort the pregnancy, but neither should the (later) mother be able to hide the fact the man is a father as it's also his child, deny him the oportunity to say if he wants to be a father, or give him the option to take on full fatherhood if she wishes to surrender the child to the state. In both Canada and the States, a man has no right to the knowledge of whether…
/r/MensRights09/05/22 10:27 AM
54

So why can't men? That's the question. Why should only one person involved get to decide if both people become parents? Id she wants to be a mother, and he doesn't, then she should be fully responsible for her choice -- including financially.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 11:47 AM
7

The RAF is requesting that non-male and non-indigenous person be the pilot? Shouldn't the British airforce showcase the achievments of those indigenous to the Isles?
/r/MensRights05/05/22 11:54 AM
18

She has fragile feminity. She can't allow anyone else to have fun and must be the centre of attention.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 10:38 AM
1

Toenails can become ingrown and infected. Would you claim that pulling out all toenails (without anesthetics) is valid preventative medicine? Mammographies on all newborn girls to prevent breast cancer? There has been no comprehensive study on the number of complications caused by routine circumcision and the number of issues from having a foreskin versus not to even begin to say if there is possibly enough benefit to justify all the deaths caused by infant MGM.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 11:33 AM
26

How is it against women? If a child is born, it's not like only the mother has to support it. Whenever financial abortion is brought up, men are told that if they didn't want a child, they "should keep it in their pants." Now, both people involved have less choice.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 10:01 AM
27

It serves no purpose, damages the functioning of the penis, can cause major issues (like any surgery can) including death by infection and/or blood loss, is non-consenual and irreversable.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 12:10 PM
23

Almost right.It was Abraham, not Jesus like the other guy claimed. Both Noah and Abraham are entirely fictional, and were supposed to be about 4000-5000 BCE, I think.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 11:56 AM
2

I'm gay and would be tempted to punch someone in the face if they called me queer.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 03:32 PM
1

It's all about creating an ever-shifting lexicon so they can readily determine who is in the "in-group" and who isn't. Code-phrases, if you will, and an excuse to attack "trespassers."
/r/MensRights28/04/22 03:29 PM
2

Then you realize you're opinion is irrelevant to the article? You can't give more sick days to women for menstrual pain if they have unlimited sick days. This an article about giving more days off to one gender than another, i.e. gender discrimination.
/r/MensRights24/04/22 11:34 AM
8

Men need, on average, 20% more calories. Should men get paid more to account for the biological difference in sexes? It wouldn't affect women, so they shouldn't complain. Or, would such a difference in pay, a 'wage gap' if you will, be deemed discriminatory? If companies should treat employees the same regardless of gender, then that goes both ways.
/r/MensRights23/04/22 01:24 PM
20

b) this is LITERALLY no different from my male colleague who gets a bad migraine... That's the point. Give everyone a few more sick days a year, and not just women.
/r/MensRights23/04/22 01:08 PM
5

When it comes to feminist terms, they claim you can't argue against them without a gender studies degree. That's like the Vatican saying you can't argue against Catholicism without graduating from the seminary.
/r/MensRights05/04/22 12:10 PM
3

In the UK, you shouldn't identify as white if you are Anglo, Gaelic, Cornish, Welsh, etc. Call yourself Indigenous because you are. It'll cause some heads to implode.
/r/MensRights05/04/22 09:45 AM
7

Which items were women only? When did I say I was dictating what a woman could or could not wear? My entire list applies to both. What's the problem? It's repulsive. It's perverted. I also said, repeatedly, that there is a place for everything, and people should dress appropriately for the location.
/r/MensRights02/04/22 01:12 PM
17

There is a time and place for everything. Fitness clothes at a place where fitness is done -- but if it's so tight it causes your genitals to pop out like a bas relief, then it's still inappropriate and indecent. Nudity is fine in designated places. If your shorts ride so high your ass is falling out, then those are underwear, not shorts. This is gender-neutral. Appropriate clothing for one place may not be appropriate at another. Edit: and some is only ever appropriate in your own home, with th…
/r/MensRights02/04/22 04:56 AM
18

Agree with other comments. It doesn't work with some women. I don't know if they think you're lying, think they can get a three way with two guys, or just find men not interested in them "hot."
/r/MensRights02/04/22 04:40 AM
2

By that... "logic," yes.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 12:31 PM
12

Yes. In the early gay rights movement, elements of the feminist movement claimed that gay men were the ultimate expression of misogyny.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 05:06 AM
6

I strongly prefer intact.
/r/MensRights13/03/22 03:30 AM
7

If men and women (genders) don't exist, then men can't be conspiring to oppress women (patriarchy.)
/r/MensRights07/03/22 12:51 PM
20

You can chop off any part of your body you want. Keep your hands off other people's.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 04:25 AM
2

Conservatives and Democrats. The two American parties switched places on the liberal/conservative axis of politics.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 10:34 AM
4

Do you lack critical reading skills? "They will gaslight you. They can't help themselves." Sounds bad to me.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 10:48 AM
103

The law making illegal to discriminate based on gender was passed in Australia in 1977. 45 years ago. Your analogy has long lost its merits.
/r/MensRights19/02/22 10:55 AM
3

The sex harassment training sounds like corporate CYA. She sounds immature. The scorpion bit sounds like personal CYA, and following the corporate one to ensure he gets more work.
/r/MensRights14/02/22 05:11 AM
8

That's the analogy that got me banned from r/atheism. They were angry at a pastor who had a men's only fishing trip, with spots obtained via raffle. A woman entered and won a spot; she was reminded it was men only. She protested. She was told it was so the men would feel safe, to not have to risk false rape/assault claims. R/atheism said they never (or rarely) happen, I gave this "analogy".
/r/MensRights31/12/21 10:57 AM
4

Ellen also created Justin Beiber... and acted like a complete pedophile whenever she had him on her show.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 01:26 PM
5

R/Atheism banned me for questioning feminism.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 12:22 PM
1

The demand to remake movies solely to replace men is sexist.
/r/MensRights18/11/21 09:25 AM
2

Why do you need a female led spy movie? If you answer to simply have one, your intentions are sexist at the core. That is what this is, sexism. Changing established brands solely to put a woman (or women) in the lead is pure sexism.
/r/MensRights18/11/21 05:44 AM
7

I don't think Buddhists have a "hell." They undergo Samsara and are reincarnated or lived a pure enough life to undergo Nirvana.
/r/MensRights12/11/21 01:30 PM
1

You mean 'incel?' It means both, to them.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 02:28 PM
1

You mean 'incel?' It means both, to them.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 02:28 PM
7

Then your celibacy would be voluntary, no? Thus, you aren't incel.
/r/MensRights16/10/21 11:50 AM
3

Using Political Compass in Canada had me 50% in line with every party, PPC included. My views that all races and genders should be treated equally -- full stop -- was taken as extreme right wing. I'm also very pro-union and worker's rights.
/r/MensRights16/10/21 12:29 AM
1

Good. I've worked with an absolutely wonderful lesbian -- one of those people who has a great sense of humour -- and lived next to lesbians who loved me and my (male) roommate until they found out he was straight. They'd run inside and shut the blinds whenever he was outside thereafter.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 11:28 AM
42

They do; political lesbianism is a thing, there is a... teaching? school of thought? that any sex involving a penis is inherently violent and should be treated as assault, and that gay men are the epitomy of misogyny.
/r/MensRights07/10/21 11:48 AM
8

A man cannot petition for paternity tests in France. It is deliberately difficult in other places where the State wants a man (any man) to pay for a child not his. It's also in the CHILD'S best interest to know who their father is, but you hand wave away two people's rights because it might make one person uncomfortable. "There is no legal obligation for a woman..." That's the problem right there. A father has no right to know he is a father under the current rules, and until that changes any cl…
/r/MensRights30/09/21 02:43 AM
11

Yet, at no point, does the man have the right to even know he is a father -- or not the father in some places -- unless granted permission by the woman. It is not equal.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 02:01 AM
15

58.8% is reciprocal. Of the remainder, it's almost 2/3 male victims and 1/3 female.
/r/MensRights17/09/21 01:50 PM
3

Boys get erections before they're born. They're necessary to keep the penis functioning correctly.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 12:16 PM
-13

You're right, it's uglier and sillier.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 10:07 AM
52

People don't "turn" gay. Did you "turn" straight? You are or aren't. I'm gay and never paint my nails. As for make-up being gay, go to a sports event and you will see vast numbers of "manly" men wearing make-up.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 08:47 AM
5

Is Area 51 assuming lizard people's gender? If they have one? ☺
/r/MensRights11/07/21 01:29 AM
2

Incorrect. The forelegs contain all the same bones as human arms. Scientifically, they aren't legs. It even made it onto the show QI.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 09:13 AM
17

Got banned from r/atheism for saying men-only fishing trips (fund raising prize) isn't sexist if the organisers didn't feel safe having women along. They were afraid of being falsely accused of rape, and I used the M&M argument feminists used to illustrate this point. Didn't go over well having it used against women.
/r/MensRights26/05/21 02:35 PM
14

Cunt is no worse than dick.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 12:11 PM
21

No idea. Seeing the crap all my straight male friends go through has always baffled me and made me glad I'm gay... not that being gay doesn't have issues. It's just if a guy tried to pull half the stuff on his boyfriend that I've seen routinely done by girls, he'd be labeled abusive and rightly so.
/r/MensRights09/03/21 01:39 PM
-5

Right wing does not support more rights and freedoms; they support some rights and freedoms... for a select few sects of one religion and for corporations.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 12:45 PM
6

Without consent is the key point. Babies can't consent. Leave it for him when he grows up and can choose for himself.
/r/MensRights01/01/21 12:36 PM
7

And Christian. Same location.
/r/MensRights01/01/21 12:29 PM
1

Mandatory "communists and fascists were enemies in WWII. They are not the same thing." comment.
/r/MensRights24/12/20 02:29 PM
2

CTV had snippets of info when they were freed (not kidnapped), but not a peep from CBC. Canada, btw.
/r/MensRights19/12/20 11:57 AM
5

Or have sex with men!
/r/MensRights30/10/20 12:22 PM
3

So it's perfectly fine for men to hit women if they don't use their full strength?
/r/MensRights09/10/20 10:07 AM
3

Not for police, and pretty sure even a former step mom could be considered an authority figure.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 02:01 PM
1

CBC also says the same, but couches it in terms of job loses (which may or may not be true.) No article linked, so I can't say if TorStar means the same thing.
/r/MensRights18/09/20 06:07 AM
0

Yes, it is. It's social capitalism, where there are social safety nets in a generally capitalist system -- with social restrictions on corporations. Labour laws are socialist. Medicare is socialist. EI is socialist. There is no pure capitalist or socialist gov't in the world.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 04:31 AM
5

And capitalism is why Zimbabwe is doing so well? Totalitarianism is totalitarianism, no matter what ideology the despot wraps themself in to get there.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 04:27 AM
24

They need to put "woman" in there, or people will assume it's a man. It's in our interest the gender is specified.
/r/MensRights17/07/20 08:47 AM
1

As in many things, I don't overly care as long as it is consistent.
/r/MensRights10/07/20 02:20 AM
35

Feminists say men should have no say on abortion laws because they don't get pregnant. It's a double standard.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 12:26 PM
3

Benign prostate enlargement is extremely common.
/r/MensRights10/06/20 06:16 AM
7

Rightism's legacy is violence. Humanity's legacy is violence. However, we should be trying to move past violence.
/r/MensRights06/06/20 08:49 AM
5

Heard that a lot when I brought it up.
/r/MensRights05/06/20 10:37 AM
5

Satire account.
/r/MensRights26/05/20 12:02 PM
1

Wrong presidential candidate.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 04:26 AM
4

No. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/06/04/supreme-court-rules-against-gay-wedding-exemptions/1052989001/
/r/MensRights16/01/20 04:17 AM
2

There are very many businesses that aren't gay friendly. Think of the gay wedding cake fiasco a few years back, or the campaigns many businesses backed against gay marriage rights.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 04:15 AM
2

Based on everything I've ever seen, it's when women show up that men do stupid things for the women.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 10:01 AM
16

Shall we yank toenails out of unanesthatized people because it can prevent infections? Cut off noses and earlobes? Surely they serve no purpose but make it more difficult to clean.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 10:36 AM
3

Yup, agree with you on that. I'm not into women, so why would I want to date someone with stereotypical feminine features?
/r/MensRights22/10/19 09:56 AM
1

Yet the fight against Christianity is in those States because they demand prayers in the locker rooms before highchool football games, prayers in the stadiums, the ten commandments displayed in front of court houses, religious (Christian) literature passed out to school children, ministers brought in to preach to children at school assemblies, laws based on their religious beliefs passed at state/provincial level (and federal in some cases)... Christianity is fighting tooth and nail to control p…
/r/MensRights07/10/19 11:56 PM
3

No, it's because Christianity is the dominant religion in North America and it's constantly seeking to force itself into schools, courts, and everywhere else it doesn't belong. If people kept their religion at home where it belongs, a personal belief, then you'd see fewer attacks on Christianity. Your complaint is like a drunk driver complaining that the cops are out to get him every time he gets pulled over. Stop driving drunk and maybe you won't be 'targeted.'
/r/MensRights06/10/19 07:10 AM
2

The constitutionally protected right is to bear arms as part of a regulated militia.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 12:51 PM
2

Do you not have to go through the gov't when selling vehicles (transfer of ownership) or house (deeds)? The can is already opened. Houses can't kill people. Yes, the gov't should be able to say, "No, you can't sell your gun to that person. She's insane and liable to kill someone."
/r/MensRights10/08/19 11:32 AM
0

At what time will Americans stand up for the constitution? War is being waged on the separation of church and state, with the Republicans placing Christian monuments like the 10 commandments on gov't property. Trump is in violation of the constitution, like the emoluments clause which was written right into the constitution by the founding fathers, not amended into it. Moscow Mitch is refusing to allow protections be passed in order to try to keep the election safe from foreign interference. Wha…
/r/MensRights10/08/19 11:05 AM
2

Because the NRA and their stooges either undermine the rules or just ignore them. What good is a background check if you can just go to a fair and buy a gun without one?
/r/MensRights10/08/19 09:05 AM
0

The Founding Fathers wrote about militias using muskets because the US didn't have a standing army, and opposed the idea of a standing army. The Founding Fathers also approved of amendments to update the constitution... like a 2nd amendment.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 09:04 AM
0

Thanks. People don't need to die this way; just acknowledging this seems so difficult for some people.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 01:41 PM
0

I defined it, moron. A single search will provide definitions used by every jurisdiction around the world. No flexible goalposts needed, except by you. You're whole argument on this has been nothing but ad hominem attacks and shifting terms. You still haven't addressed the issue-- NO other nation in the world has as many mass shootings as the US. That's per capita and raw numbers.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 01:24 PM
2

The goal of the Republicans and the NRA is to cause outrage whenever someone tries to enact commonsense restrictions: background checks, no guns for mentally ill people...
/r/MensRights09/08/19 01:19 PM
2

Fix the system that's currently in place... Which is what strengthening and enforcing background checks was meant to do; still got blocked by Moscow Mitch.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 01:17 PM
2

They are a small portion of deaths/year, but no other cause of death inflicted on someone by someone else (bad diets are self-inflicted, for example) incites such outrage when people try reduce the numbers.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 11:42 AM
4

Here. Look under the US: The United States has had more mass shootings than any other country. Five citations. Japan has, on average, two shootings per year -- and they aren't even mass shootings. How many has the US had in the last week? Four?
/r/MensRights09/08/19 11:36 AM
-6

That's what they said in Australia before they enacted gun control laws.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 11:26 AM
7

Ad hominem attacks when you have nothing worthwhile to post. No Western nation on earth has the scale of mass shootings that the US does, per capita. It's not until you get into failed states or states in active war (like Syria) that you get numbers on the scale of the US. Data doesn't become false just because you don't like it.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 11:25 AM
31

Spain had slaves!? Gasp! Who'd a thunk it? Every nation and culture in the world used slaves at some time or other, but for some reason people forget that and just think it was an English phenomenon. Of course there would have been slavery in Mexico. Hell, it was the Aztec in Mexico before Spain arrived, and they're rather infamous for the way they treated slaves.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 11:21 AM
0

No? Then why does the States have the highest rate of mass killings in the Western world? Why did the mass killings in Australia plummet when access to guns were restricted? Mass killings will happen regardless, but usually killing by vehicle or knife result in fewer deaths. Stress on the 'usually.'
/r/MensRights05/08/19 06:37 AM
2

Some of those bags look very heavy.
/r/MensRights04/08/19 06:57 AM
1

Floral or plain colored? How about a Lava Lava? Into Oriental, how about Kimono / Yukata Samurai? Only with the right skin colour, otherwise you're 'appropriating culture.' I hate that term. Outrage culture is in full swing, unfortunately. Kimono are beautiful, for men and women.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 01:52 PM
3

The majority of the world doesn't criminalise nudity and fetishise guns. It's pretty much guaranteed every (continental) European child has seen naked men and women before.
/r/MensRights29/07/19 11:28 AM
1

Wasn't that incarnation of Thor Freya?
/r/MensRights29/07/19 11:24 AM
0

Absolutely, look who is the new PM of the UK. He's renowned around the world for being an idiot -- Britain's Trump, even.
/r/MensRights28/07/19 11:39 AM
1

A retired Bond? No retconning? Better, but I'd prefer a different code-name. Yes, there was a huge kerfuffle when a blond Bond was selected. I'm also not a big Bond fan; the Bond-girl schtick always annoyed me too much to enjoy the older films.
/r/MensRights21/07/19 08:10 AM
6

I think he likely did cross the line into violence and abuse, but he was found not guilty, and the judge said in the verdict that his accusers deliberately misled the court and conspired together prior to testifying. No charges were laid for perjury and conspiring to subvert the course of justice. His mistake, in my opinion, was to trust the producers at the CBC. He shouldn't have talked to them about any of this.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 01:40 PM
3

Interesting note: The Maccabee massacres happened because too many Jews were turning away from circumcision and dogmatic Judaism toward Hellenic philosophy, science, and beliefs. They slaughtered Jewish families he refused to lop off part of their sons' dicks, and are celebrated during Hanukkah. If there is any holiday that should be dropped...
/r/MensRights20/07/19 01:33 PM
0

No established character was recast as a different race or gender in Star Wars. Granted the General Purple movie was a piece of utter trash for a huge number of reasons, but that's a different thing than recasting already established characters.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 01:19 PM
2

What the hell is wrong with making a 006 (or whatever) spin-off? Same everything, but a different code-name.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 01:16 PM
18

Gay man here. I hate feminism, and I don't see how any gay man could like it given we're "the ultimate expression of misogyny." I support equal rights for all, and feminism has shown throughout its history that it opposes equal rights.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 01:52 PM
1

Conservatives suck. They want religious laws, and are gun nuts.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 01:10 PM
2

... you have no idea what you're talking about. "Liberal" is the name of many left-wing (or centre left) political parties around the world. It is left wing, as in 'socially conservative' versus 'socially liberal.'
/r/MensRights07/07/19 01:09 PM
1

You likely see more than I do, so I'll defer to your experience.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 07:21 AM
5

Reminds me of a Disney Tale Spin episode where Baloo loses his shirt out the window. A nude/not nude thing given he (and Kit) never wear pants.
/r/MensRights21/06/19 01:20 PM
7

Nor is that the way it goes in reverse.
/r/MensRights21/06/19 06:16 AM
1

That's a bit extreme; holding hands may be punishment enough for some of these people. Bungee jumping or cliff diving could be a team bonding exercise. Could you imagine the likes of Julie and Milo having to go through a series of bungee jumps holdings hands? That said, you'll see people in this sub getting called out on hate speech. This is probably the first time Julie Bindel has ever been called out by 'allies' for her hate, hence the outrage.
/r/MensRights21/06/19 06:12 AM
1

Stephen Colbert is someone I consider a master of irony and humour, but when he jokes about the criminality of Trump, he's making a serious statement in a humourous way. My point is that Julie Bindel may be trying to make a joke, but the intent behind it is as labeled on the tin. When called out on her 'jokes,' the attempted humour doesn't negate the hate, nor should it prevent it from being prosecuted as hate speech.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 06:15 AM
1

It is -- and isn't -- irony. If an 'ironic' statement meshes closely to one's actions, is it still irony or actual desire? If she acts to demonise men, create arbitrary laws or interpretations of laws incarcerating more men, and otherwise seeks to destroy everything masculine, aren't the above quotes accurate descriptions of her goals?
/r/MensRights15/06/19 01:34 PM
5

Also, he is a guy, and sexy older woman approaching one is not abuse it is a dream. That would apply in reverse, too. Regardless of your opinion on age of consent, if a 44 y.o. male deputy had sex with a 16 y.o. girl, then the article would definitely have used the word 'rape.' That is what the post is about.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 12:50 PM
6

I'd like a source before making a statement -- either way (men are or women are.) I wouldn't be surprised if you're right.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 12:42 PM
3

I agree. I made the point mostly due to the mindset that feminist = evil here. There are those who call themselves feminist on the premise that feminism = egalitarianism, however incorrect that may be in practice. We should look at words and actions over titles.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 08:37 AM
1

9-11 happened under Republicans, no support was given to them.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 07:45 AM
2

Jon Stewart is a self-proclaimed feminist, one I happen to agree with on a vast array of subjects, but there are some points I don't.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 07:43 AM
2

The truest measure of manhood is a willingness to serve one’s wife... Feminism all too often finds an ally in social conservatives. Both place women on a pedestal needing to be served by men and unable to be held accountable for their actions.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 01:33 PM
7

Gunpowder? China. Steel? China. Porcelain? China. The number zero? India, arrived in Europe via Arabia. I could go on, like much of advanced robotics is coming from Japan.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 01:23 PM
2

And English got it from the French 'histoire' which is a feminine article -- la histoire.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 07:56 AM
8

The whole erectile dysfunction fascination is a bit unfair. Stress, anxiety, et al. directly causes ED, and the military -- by definition -- sends people to places that causes stress, anxiety, etc. They're morally obligated to treat a problem they cause. I support gov'ts helping to treat trans persons, the outrage some people have 'the government is buying sex pills!' is immoral. Edit: Thanks for my first silver, fair/handsome stranger!
/r/MensRights10/06/19 07:47 AM
1

Women want to work less hours because they're physically smaller? Um, you'll need a source for that one.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 01:47 PM
2

I disagree on the 'had it harder' part. There is nothing harder, in my safe and sheltered position, than storming enemy lines. The war could not have been won without all those contributing, but diminishing the sacrifice of the front line fighters does a great disservice to the terrible loss of life among the young men of that generation.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 01:42 PM
3

This is in Canada, I'm not sure we take the same stances common in the US on this issue. I wouldn't be surprised either way, though.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 01:24 PM
1

In Europe and North America, not in China, Japan, Korea, Egypt...
/r/MensRights07/06/19 01:18 PM
3

I'm pro choice, too, but please keep in mind that paying child support often means a man has to take a job -- any job -- and that huge numbers of men are permanently injured or killed each year. 95% of all workplace deaths are men. Even ignoring accidents, men make up the majority of the heavy labour workforce which can place huge strain on the body but goes beyond 9 months.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 01:09 PM
6

Nah, dumpsters are far more convenient.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 01:03 PM
5

Women have all the choices in whether she has a child or not. If not more options on birth control, there is abortion, adoption, surrendering the child at any emergency service (hospitals, fire departments, police stations...) or giving custody to the father. Or, hey, she could do what feminists tell men their only option is-- not have sex. That's the whole point beyond the men's rights position -- men have no say in whether they become a father or not beyond celibacy. Condoms don't always work,…
/r/MensRights07/06/19 12:55 PM
1

To add onto the other comment, when you get farther north the sun gets more fierce during the summer. I work with Indians and North Africans (not just descent, but literal off the boat/plane people) and they say it feels hotter in the direct sun here than there at the same official temp. Also, the bus would have a lot of windows for visibility forcing the drivers to be in that direct light. It'd get fricken hot even with AC.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 01:38 PM
1

Not raising the temp to 28, but allowing it to reach 28 before the AC kicks in. I work in an environment that requires me to move around a lot, plus work in areas with poor ventilation, and I feel dangerously close to heatstroke after a couple hours at 22-24 degrees at 'hallway' temps.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 12:54 PM
1

I never said these students were 'retarded,' I implied that the possibility should be taken into account. And those teachers should be held to account if they violated the trust given to them if they did so. People in positions of authority shouldn't have sex with those under them; the potential for abuse is too high.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 06:53 AM
2

Extra toes? Toenails? Don't need five fingers or exterior nose bits either. I could go on for many "unnecessary" body parts if you want.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 01:45 PM
10

"Special ed students." We don't know their particular capability to consent, but it does add an extra... nuance to the situation. I, also, think 16-17 y.o. guys can consent, but not with teachers or people of authority. However, the big problem is the double standard; a male teacher "having sex with" his female charges would not be getting such a pass from the press.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 01:11 PM
6

It has a major influence on Brexit and legislation until the next GE.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 06:01 AM
1

I "wonder" where this is from... It'd be justice if you could inform me of the source before I wander leagues searching for the answer, friend.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 01:35 PM
1

You play board games with your friends; D&D/Pathfinder give you the rules, and you make the world. If you and your friends want to play in a world composed solely of men, then you can do so. Want to provide gender differences? Apply stat changes however you wish with house rules. Rule #1 is the DM's/GM's say is final.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 01:27 PM
1

Europe began the Industrial Revolution, but current day society wouldn't exist without Japan. A lot, not all, of modern electronics are developed or built off Japanese tech; cutting edge robotics are the prime example of Japanese ingenuity.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 01:21 PM
0

He conspired with Russia. I already told you 'collusion' isn't a legal term, so of course the liar-in-chief wasn't found to have colluded. If Mueller found Dotard Donnie oh-so-innocent, why is Trump doing everything under the sun, particularly ordering his minions to commit crimes, to hide the report?
/r/MensRights19/05/19 12:56 PM
0

Canada's healthcare is better than American healthcare. People can't afford basic doctor visits and go bankrupt trying to get medicine. Debt over ambulance bills? You mean American ones are free? The private insurance death panels, which denied all 'pre-existing' conditions (including things whicharen't pre-existing like newly diagnosed cancer), do their best to kill off the poor. Canada's medicare sucks? Then why do we get flooded by caravans looking for affordable medicine? It's not just Centr…
/r/MensRights19/05/19 12:54 PM
0

Yes, it did help the poor. They could actually afford insurance, more people were eligible, and it saved the gov't hundreds of millions. America is the most expensive nation in the world for healthcare, and the only developed nation without a national plan. Only Faux News claims the opposite despite all the evidence to the contrary.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 06:42 AM
0

I preferred Bernie. Hillary was still better than Trump -- a pawn of Wall Street over a stool of the Kremlin.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 06:39 AM
0

At least some of them tried -- Obamacare helped the poor nation wide, even when the ReDumplicans neutered what it was supposed to be, and are still trying to get rid of it.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 06:20 AM
0

"They" encrypted e-mails. Dotard Donnie is way too stupid to do so, he just tears documents into pieces despite being told it's illegal to do so. His family uses unauthorized devices under orders from the Russians to conduct their treason. Funny they needed the president to get them clearance to enter the White House because all people with knowledge on security knew the entire Drumph family was compromised and a security threat.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 06:17 AM
1

Corrupt in your favour? The Republicans ran those inquisitions and found nothing. Mueller didn't look into collusion; one, there is no crime called collusion, and two, he did find that Trump and his team met with Russians illegally. Obstruction of Justice is a crime. Trump committed that crime, along with many others. As for double think, what about them e-mails, hmm? Lock her up, was Trump's mantra... but silence on his family encrypting e-mails, using addresses and servers not accessible for o…
/r/MensRights18/05/19 06:28 AM
0

Why dismantle rather than just fix? Oh, right, because they have no plans to actually replace them. The Republicans just want to tell everyone who isn't rich to sit and spin.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 06:19 AM
0

Funny enough, Hillary went through four fake ass Benghazi investigations without obstructing justice. The legitimate investigation Trump underwent, since he admitted to looking for help from the Russians on television, has been fought through illegal means from the beginning. He's also been found to have violated elections laws.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 06:40 AM
0

Source? What Republican gov't has increased funding for housing? What increased access to healthcare has the Republicans provided? They're currently restricting access. Come on, any reputable source. Workplace safety? They're dismantling protections.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 06:38 AM
0

But legislation to resolve/ help MRA issues -- homelessness, addictions, mental health, workplace safety, etc -- are actively opposed by right wing parties. Which party in the USA is destroying unions and rolling back safety legislation? The Republicans. Which party is making it harder to access health care? The Republicans. Injustice is only one of our issues, and neither party -- Republican or Democrat -- is working to resolve the sentencing disparity. The Republicans want more men to become i…
/r/MensRights14/05/19 12:47 PM
2

Is it thinly veiled? Recently it's been 'slap your face' American nationalism.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 12:42 PM
1

Okay :) just playing with how English vs American words are spelt.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 12:41 PM
1

American spelling. The English word is queue.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 12:40 PM
0

No, he didn't. He said Russia absolutely meddled in the election; 'collusion' isn't part of the criminal code, but conspiracy is. So, while there was no 'collusion', there was conspiracy and continuing obstruction of justice.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 12:40 PM
0

What's wrong with killing fascists? Fascism is abhorrent and nothing to do with MRA. The Nazis weren't heroes.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 01:49 PM
3

Indus river valley? Yangtze? Mesopotamia? All of the original cradles of humanity were non-white. It wasn't until the Roman Empire invaded the properly 'white' parts of Europe that we started growing beyond barbarian tribes.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 01:47 PM
1

Give up on the Russian troll. There's no hope for this one. I disagree with your parent comment, but I despise this left vs right mindset the moron has.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 01:34 PM
1

GASP! Cassie Jaye never converted after she made the Redpill movie? Edit: Actually, reading the idiocy you're writing, I'm inclined to think you're actually a Russian troll.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 01:31 PM
0

It was... until Trumpism reared it's head here about a year ago. It's gone downhill into a left vs right war all too often since. Now, redpill insults like 'cuck,' and Fox News ones like 'leftie,' liebril, and a supposed insult like 'socialist' are common.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 01:30 PM
2

It's as simple as not identifying yourself by a label and rather by your individual beliefs. I lean left, but am not an NDP, Liberal, or Green (Canada). I support right wing ideas I agree with and oppose left wing ones I don't. Making a label part of your identity blinds yourself to the wrong committed by your fellows and the good by your 'enemies.'
/r/MensRights13/05/19 01:24 PM
1

Because it's not accurate. It's as accurate as saying all rightie Trumpists are misogynist, racist, bigots -- accurate sometimes, but not always.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 01:21 PM
1

Really, who the fuck cares if someone leans left or right when discussing men's rights? Some of us on the left support equal rights -- including men's rights -- while some on the right don't support equal rights and actually hate women.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 01:20 PM
1

*Queue. Cue is what you hit billiards balls with. A queue is a line-up.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 01:04 PM
4

User leans left. Who gives a damn?
/r/MensRights13/05/19 01:03 PM
1

Sounds good to me. I have no idea what is going on with the down votes.
/r/MensRights11/05/19 01:39 PM
1

From what I read, it said the feminising effects were inconclusive. The people using 'soyboy' on here seem to be the men's right version of radfems, if not outright trolls.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 06:27 AM
-5

Inconclusive benefits and harms, according to Harvard.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 12:49 PM
10

No, I'm saying it's not her body. Or the father's. Endanger yourself, if you want, but not an innocent person.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 03:07 PM
55

As long as it's their body and not their children's.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 01:30 PM
1

You are a stuck record. You haven't offered a single explanation and just keep saying 'nu-uh!' I've been saying why things are the way they are and just get the same repetitious denial in return. You obviously think the present is divorced from the past if you don't think Maimonides has no influence on current Jewish thinking. You then have to disregard the fact that Christianity and Islam were born from Judaism. The sex hating teachings in those religions provided Kellogg -- and the vast array …
/r/MensRights13/03/19 01:11 PM
1

So you have no valid argument and just dismiss actual reasons out of hand. Yes, I have seen (online), and heard, mothers say this was the reason they cut up their sons' genitals. Maybe you should get out and talk to people. I don't make up arguments to mutilate boys, I refute stupid ideas I hear -- this is one of them. Most people don't know why they continue to lop the end of dicks off other than that's what is done. Why it was done is important. And if you think people no longer care what hist…
/r/MensRights12/03/19 04:48 PM
2

Mothers have the only say over what happens to a baby. When mommy hates intact penises, guess what she'll choose? One rabbi? I'm not quoting Joe Schmoe from Nowheresville, it's Maimonides. Your ignorance doesn't invalidate the huge influence he's had on rabbinical teachings for hundreds of years. And, in case your ignorance is greater than I thought, rabbi are the scholars and teachers of Jewish tradition. Dr. Kellogg was deranged, but so was Joseph Smith, the founder of the Church of the Latter…
/r/MensRights12/03/19 01:47 PM
5

Medical harm? Absolutely. Every surgery comes with risk, particularly infection, and that doesn't include those passed on by some religious figure sucking on the baby's dick.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 07:13 AM
5

Maimonedes would differ (the most influential rabbi in history.) He said it is done for the explicit reason to reduce male sensitivity, in an attempt to keep sex solely for procreation. Dr. Kellog (highly instrumental in promoting MGM in the USA) promoted it for the exact same reason. Nowadays, it is often done in the US because of women's preferences and tradition, but that doesn't eliminate the barbaric reasons it started.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 07:01 AM
1

It's extremely obvious. She also misses some points about how little rights men have (no say in whether they get circumcised, lack of choice in paternity, etc..) but these comments are outrageous.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 06:58 AM
1

Obamacare was the neutered version of what was wanted in order to try to make it palatable for the Republicans. Stupid idea. Nothing Obama put forward would have been palatable simply because he put it forward.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 06:35 AM
4

Same with your penis. If it's washed, you aren't going to get infections. It's unnecessary, outside of very few exceptions which can be dealt with then.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 06:32 AM
2

You're being deliberately obtuse.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 06:24 AM
2

Millions of Americans are an illness away from bankruptcy due to your lack of socialism. Who put them in that position? Elephant head did.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 01:46 PM
5

If it affects his ability to walk or drive, sure.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 01:43 PM
1

Socially libertarian -- your rights end where another person's body begins. Gov't out of the bedrooms of our nation. Socially authoritarian -- Saudi Arabia. The gov't dictates what you can say, do, drink, eat, who you can have sex with...
/r/MensRights11/03/19 01:43 PM
2

Yes, lets rip out toenails at birth, too. It save problems in the future. Take out appendices while we're at it. Noses and ears are just useless bits of external skin; lop them off -- there are many cases where it's the better option.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 01:39 PM
8

So you think parents should be able to have sex with their child? It's theirs, they can do whatever they want with it. Why not practice a bit of libertarianism and say your rights end where someone else's body begins? As a gay guy, I say an intact dick is better in every possible way.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 01:35 PM
1

Trump also cries about everything. Socialism is a good idea.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 01:31 PM
2

I find it similar to asking why we don't rip babies toenails out right after birth to prevent infections and in-grown toenails.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 01:29 PM
3

Had to go through surgery at 25 for skin bridges, too. Also no frenulum. Agree with all you said.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 01:28 PM
2

Depends on how it heals. It can cause long term pain if too much skin is removed.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 01:19 PM
2

Cutting off pieces of other people is wrong. If an adult wants to cut of their own nose, let them.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 01:18 PM
2

Who are you to say it isn't? Cultures that mutilate unconsenting children are wrong.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 01:17 PM
9

It's the same as mutilation because it is mutilation. It's a stone age practice that should be left in the dustbin of history.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 01:15 PM
9

No, it's been studied and shown to be fact.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 01:13 PM
-8

If he responds to all of Trump's tweets, I agree he wouldn't have time. The only time Trump isn't tweeting is when he's golfing.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 01:11 PM
1

Pure left is no more authoritarian than pure right is, unless you have economics as the y axis. You can have very socially libertarian and financially regulated views as you can have very socially authoritarian and fiscally libertarian views. The current Republicans fall under the latter category, while Sanders would be more the former. I don't get the sort of feminism we discuss on here -- it seems both authoritarian and libertarian depending on the second of the day... ie crass hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 01:08 PM
1

In the 50's we had strong unions and labour rights (US, UK, Canada), and since the 80's those rights have been under attack -- started by Reagan, Thatcher, and Mulroney. It wasn't the increase of women's rights, but the decline of unions and increased corporate mobility. You're right, merely stating something doesn't make it true. Alan Turing was also gay, and the mathematicians for the early space launches were women. The inventors of modern astronomical measurements for stars were also women. …
/r/MensRights07/03/19 07:18 AM
1

No, I ignored the portion of race as it isn't relevant to the discussion -- men risk their lives for others more than women do. There is absolutely racism at play.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 02:41 PM
6

Pretty much all societies have collapsed. The UK is the collapsed British Empire. The People's Republic of China is not the China of the past. The USA is a (comparatively) new society and appears to be on the decline (debatable). The societies of the Middle East have changed hands so many times that the 'for sale' stickers have piled up so thickly that books are ashamed. Privileging women has no bearing on the success or failure of a nation.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 11:01 AM
1

Some gay men have hangups about sex, most of us don't (based on my personal experience.) Sex is physical, and can be entirely separate from emotional relationships. If both of us want to get laid, why waste time sending 'signals'?
/r/MensRights05/03/19 08:13 AM
5

Sorry to disappoint, but that 'paper' you linked to doesn't seem to look at physical requirements... which extremely few women can pass. It's just looking at whether lawsuits are being filed. Given the physical requirements inherent in firefighting, and to a lesser extent, policing, it's only logical that fewer women would be in those fields.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 07:43 AM
9

Your wife's opinion is as valid as a guy saying all women should be required to have breast implants.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 09:12 AM
3

Neutering dogs is cruel, too. Just give them a vasectomy.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 12:51 PM
-2

It's a legitimate question.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 12:42 PM
3

The baby boy didn't consent; he is being locked up by the mother in a space too small to stretch out or lie comfortably! Furthermore, in complete isolation for 9 months! This is torture under the Geneva convention. All mothers are war criminals! /s Edit: Just to make sure, this post is satire, and my comment was carrying on with it. It's a joke.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 07:41 AM
2

Apparently you haven't, no.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 10:27 AM
2

That phrase was coined by the Trump Whitehouse, not feminists.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 12:33 PM
26

She can, but she shouldn't have any input into what happens to another person's penis.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 12:28 PM
1

I agree, however, as another comment pointed out, we don't know if it was inequality. I went to a school where the cafeteria couldn't hold the entire student population at once, so we had lunch times separated by grade. This may be nothing more.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 02:38 PM
0

Sigh 'Lefty' =/= Feminist just as 'Righty' =/= alt-right =/= MRA. Yes, this is just a religious issue. The majority of atheists are left-leaning and we certainly don't cut Islam any slack. However, we don't tolerate bigotry, like saying all Muslims act a certain way -- as you seem to be doing -- anymore than we (as in MRA this time) like it when all men are painted as toxic.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 02:32 PM
1

Sigh 'Lefty' =/= Feminist just as 'Righty' =/= alt-right =/= MRA.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 01:56 PM
21

How about the extra 'muscle' of the courts and publicity? She has 5000% more 'muscle' than him that way.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 07:14 AM
1

https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2015/jul/24/gay-genes-science-is-on-the-right-track-were-born-this-way-lets-deal-with-it https://www.sciencefocus.com/the-human-body/gay-genetics/ Children who grow up to be nonheterosexual are substantially more gender nonconforming, on average, than children who grow up to be heterosexual. There are two types of studies supporting this. In retrospective studies, homosexual and heterosexual (and sometimes bisexual) adults are asked about their childhood …
/r/MensRights24/01/19 02:15 PM
0

Christians? Yes. Uganda has state sanctioned death squads for homosexuality, put into place under the 'guidance' of US preacher Scott Lively. Tanzania does the same. South Africa has a history of bombings at gay venues. Look at the regions where homosexuality is still illegal and you'll see a near even split between Christian and Islam. The US itself has a very sordid history of attacks on gay men; Harvey Milk and Matthew Shepard should be names you've heard of. Listen to almost any Baptist or P…
/r/MensRights24/01/19 02:05 PM
2

Or, maybe, just lesbian? Some people are homosexual for no other reason than that's the way they were born.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 09:53 AM
6

Reagan? Koch? Walton? Either Bush? Cheney? Anyone in Wall Street? Don't forget Reagan and Mulroney (both right wing) were the ones who created NAFTA.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 09:51 AM
0

There is truth to that. Too many are terrified to say it right out: the Abrahamic religions, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are homophobic. Chechnya is murdering men because Islam tells them to.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 07:20 AM
3

No, actually. Trudeau (Canada) has increased the number of gay, male refugees from Chechnya as soon as he came into power, and has recently increased it again. Kudos where kudos are due, even though I'm not a fan. The gay men I know also talk about it. The majority of feminists, however...
/r/MensRights23/01/19 02:36 PM
1

100 bed shelter opening just for women. Yup.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 02:29 PM
1

Cuckoo, among others.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 07:10 AM
12

The biological father isn't raising his kids, while the non-biological father was tricked into raising children that weren't his. The bio-dad was robbed.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 02:39 PM
3

If the best interest of the child is the most important factor, then these people should also insist the father be allowed to see their child withing 24hrs of birth to bond with him/her. The father to be automatically given 50% custody. Circumcision to be banned. Etc...
/r/MensRights04/01/19 08:28 AM
1

It's the fat. You can cuddle with a bear (chubby gay man) and get the same softness, plus a not-so-soft benefit!
/r/MensRights28/12/18 07:50 AM
5

I don't love boobs. They're gross.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 07:43 AM
2

And that's why people, correctly, call MGTOW sexist assholes. Your point?
/r/MensRights22/12/18 02:05 PM
10

The numbers I saw were in the US and UK 2010 CDC reports on inter-partner violence (if I recall correctly). Those statistics were based on interviews, not police reports. These were also the ones that showed most IPV were reciprocal (58.8%), 27.4% women as sole aggressors, and 13.8% with men as sole aggressors. I don't recall the numbers by relationship type, and I've had trouble finding the full report since; the numbers just don't seem to show up in the reports online. I'm very certain I remem…
/r/MensRights08/12/18 01:59 PM
1

Without Eden there is no Gethsemane. Without original sin, there is no need for Calvary.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 08:28 AM
24

Not LGBT, the 'G' stands for 'gay,' as in gay men. The article is about lesbians (and/or bi). Gay relationships have the lowest amounts of inter-partner violence.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 08:16 AM
2

I don't know; I live close to an elementary school and all of the speeders I see are women with kids in the car or stopping in front of the school (blocking traffic and/or the crosswalk) to pick up kids.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 10:36 AM
2

Very well, I see evidence and change my point. I'm in Canada and your news sites don't come up high on our search engines.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 10:03 AM
0

I did Google it, and found nothing. I did look for information on her claims and found nothing saying they were false. The suit from her previous employer was dismissed a month after it was filed, but regardless, her claims weren't investigated and cannot be claimed true or false until a trial. Keep defending Kavanaugh, if you wish, but until he goes to court and/or a proper investigation is done, you are guilty of the very things you accuse me of. Given how terrified the Repubs are of an invest…
/r/MensRights20/11/18 01:48 PM
0

Still no source. I've seen nothing to say 'even Democrats aren't' either.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 07:44 AM
0

You haven't provided a source showing she fabricated anything.
/r/MensRights17/11/18 08:03 AM
0

So... he's a lawyer? It's his job to protect clients, just like Cohen protected Trump until Trump turned on him, or Giuliani, or any other lawyer who's protected Trump during his long history of being brought to court for his crimes (like fraud, racism, violating contracts...) Also, 'proven to be lying'? I tried finding a source for that and found none.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 02:21 PM
2

Kids do see each other naked, but we shouldn't be forcing kids to be seen by/see the other physical gender naked. There was more than one child's rights at play here. I agree the school mucked this up royally, all the way around, and the Phys Ed teacher is just the most visible victim.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 08:51 AM
0

Avenatti is treating Trump the way Trump treats everyone else, though without making pure BS up.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 08:46 AM
0

Stormy Daniels isn't falsely accusing Trump of sexual misconduct. Lawyers represent clients in the court of law, and if someone, say a president, is libeling their client, then they have the duty to protect them. Avenatti is just treating Trump the way Trump treats others.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 08:44 AM
5

Torn on this one. Trans kids shouldn't be forced to change in the 'wrong' room, but the boys were wronged in this case by having the extreme discomfort of a still-biologically girl walking in on them while changing. I'd have been furious and embarrassed, and still would be, if put in that situation.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 02:32 PM
-4

Indeed. I'm glad someone is out there giving Trump a taste of his own medicine.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 02:24 PM
-3

Stooge for doing what he's paid to: defend a client?
/r/MensRights15/11/18 02:23 PM
1

Yes, innocent until proven guilty. There is, however, no need to rush to appoint a supreme court judge, as the Republicans showed at the end of Obama's term when they refused to even hear anything on his nominee. There was ample time to investigate the many claims made against him before voting. There was also obvious bias when Repubs said they'd appoint him regardless of results.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 09:27 AM
-2

There was no investigation. We don't know if there was no proof or not. Neither side can be believed to be impartial, and only a proper, full, investigation could have resolved the issue.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 02:02 PM
1

Are these on-the-job deaths?
/r/MensRights23/10/18 07:00 AM
1

Hecate is a prime deity in Wicca; not everyone is Abrahamic. I see it no differently than asking a male -- or multiple -- deities for help.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 11:01 AM
4

We don't know if they're lies -- on either part -- because there was nothing resembling an investigation. Ford never filed a case because the statute of limitations had past; she made an accusation, went to DC to tell her side of the story, asked for an investigation, and nothing worth calling an investigation happened. As for lies, Kavanaugh perjured himself and was still appointed. It's obvious the Republicans had made their minds up before hand and nothing would change it.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 10:45 AM
2

A much better way of reporting; names aren't really needed until conviction. I realize it isn't voluntary on their part, however.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 07:23 AM
8

Thinking positively: Does ABC News withhold the identity of all people involved in crimes prior to conviction, or is this an exception?
/r/MensRights18/10/18 06:44 AM
1

Canada used to have an age of consent at 14, but that always ruled out teachers and other authority figures until 18. I'd imagine Europe was the same.
/r/MensRights17/10/18 07:18 AM
2

Girls start puberty 2 years earlier than boys, and finish earlier, too. Plying a minor with alcohol is also an aggravating factor. They aren't equivalent, but certainly not 20 years different.
/r/MensRights17/10/18 06:56 AM
6

You do realize that it's a comma between the two phrases, not a period? You know what a comma is, or should I explain it to you in small words?
/r/MensRights05/10/18 01:29 PM
8

I read it as women and men -- as both.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 12:58 PM
1

So she's supposed to spend a week (or so) driving to her vacation, spend a day there, and turn around to go home? Really? People can be rational and do things they don't like in order to get something they want... like going to work for a paycheck.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 01:09 PM
1

Not really. Garland was delayed far longer and for less reason. It's not like he can be delayed for two and a half years. Merely seeing if there is any validity to these claims isn't the same.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 10:22 AM
-3

It's 'being accused.' He's not guilty of it, nor is she guilty of a false accusation, until an investigation and trial is done. The FBI should be involved, and his appointment hearing held off pending the results.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 01:11 PM
5

Would you worry that your daughter thinks she's different than you? No, I doubt it, you'd just say, "I'm a boy and you're a girl." It only takes a moment to say, "I had an operation when I was very young, and you didn't." Simple, easy to understand, and painless (unlike the operation).
/r/MensRights24/08/18 01:42 PM
1

Another country like Canada, UK, France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Austria...? Pretty much the same, or better, than the States. We don't separate children from their parents and lock them in cages.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 01:36 PM
1

It makes sense when you view gender attraction as a sliding scale, or multiple sliding scales (as in some RPGs). Some people are attracted to more feminine physiques while wanting male equipment attached, while others, like me, find anything stereotypically feminine off-putting. So I'm close to one end on the sliding bar, while other gay men are closer to the middle.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 07:48 AM
11

Am gay, and those twinks (term for tiny, attractive gay men of dubious mental faculties a la Zoolander) aren't my cup of tea; I agree they aren't the aspiration we should have. Those firemen, however...
/r/MensRights21/08/18 01:38 PM
3

Let people choose when they're adults and when that choice will have meaning. What value is a covenant when those so 'covenented' have no say in the matter?
/r/MensRights14/08/18 01:11 PM
2

When did I ever say it did? I really dislike feminism because it has virtually nothing to do with equality anymore. I support equal rights, which men are sorely lacking in now.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 06:02 AM
0

He started making changes, but only changes he wants, and imprisons anyone who dares request/lobby for other changes. He's actually concentrating power toward himself beyond what any previous king has done. It isn't progress, not like he claims. The prince is going the pure authoritarian route.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 07:10 AM
0

I'm glad we're in trouble with KSA. They got off with murder after 9-11 because Bush was too much of a pussy to stand up to the mastermind of the terror attack, and Trump is too busy licking the asses of dictators world-wide trying to get included in the club to stand up to them now. We produce a lot of oil here, and only a small percentage of what we import comes from that shit hole. As for the students, if they're like their king, good riddance. Note: it's a king, not an elected official. The …
/r/MensRights09/08/18 07:27 AM
1

The judge refused to watch a video exonerating the HBB, then said he saw no evidence proving the HBB didn't create the scene that supposedly got them kicked out of the Expo.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 12:24 PM
2

Whose stocks have risen and readership doubled in the last two years, making it the most profitable paper on the planet. Yup, failing. (Donny's spewing bullshit, again...)
/r/MensRights03/08/18 01:09 PM
2

Are we talking about the same NYT? 3.5 million subscribers is 'lack of readership'? It's over doubled in the last two years and probably the most successful current paper. Those who claim it's 'failin' are either uninformed or lying through their teeth.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 01:06 PM
19

Surprised there's no petition calling for her to be fired.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 12:44 PM
4

Privilege? Says the one who's entire post history is about skincare and cosmetics? Wow. Um, okay?
/r/MensRights16/07/18 09:40 AM
1

And two people marrying are hurting others? That's what you're saying. By opposing gay marriage he is sticking their nose in our business.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 09:10 AM
2

No. It's a real thing and happens across the US and Canada. Most Canadian provinces are waking up and outlawing it.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 01:39 PM
2

What the fuck does his personal opinion have anything to do with two people marrying who nothing to do with him? Is gay marriage mandating all marriages be between two men or two women? No. Is it saying he has to have rampant gay sex in every chapel around the country? No. Does it affect his life in any way? No. It's just big government (Republicans) sticking their nose in everyone else's business... as usual.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 01:38 PM
2

I get it. I was older when the prequels came out; too young for the original, but still an adult for the prequels. I hold Jedi Master Luke in high regard, and I found ep. 8 seemed to go out of their way to destroy everything that had been built up around him, such as the unnecessary milk scene making a mess of his face. I liked the fight you mentioned, too. There were some things I liked in 8, they were just outweighed by what I didn't. Honestly, the part I hated the most was when Rose 'saved' F…
/r/MensRights10/07/18 07:25 AM
1

In scenario 1, if a man were robbed or attacked, the bar would be blamed, too. In scenario 2, the reactions would be more as you say. Women are not held responsible for their own safety. As scenario 1 is the subject of the article, and the establishment would be held liable either way, I don't see this as a men's issue. The coverage may be, but not the law.
/r/MensRights10/07/18 07:16 AM
2

Not applicable to this sub. Canada has laws around issues like this for male and female patrons, and I'm guessing the Australian law is nearly identical. All establishments are responsible for the safety of their patrons until they reach home (or for the article, the police station or hospital). It was a breach of this law to dump the women on the street, and would have been if they were men, too. Edit: removed extraneous word.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 01:26 PM
1

They can lose their liquor licence in Canada. They can be fined. If there is a court case around harm caused by that drunk patron, they can be taken to court. That applies to male and female patrons.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 01:21 PM
3

Canada is the same. The Serving It Right program that all people must take to serve alcohol in BC spells it out explicitly, all establishments are responsible for their patrons and must stop serving them when they become intoxicated.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 01:20 PM
3

Ep 7 was better, in my opinion, than the prequels. I despised the bad directing and very poorly done 'romance' of those. In the prequels, the action was great, and the use of Force powers were well done, but the 'Roger, Roger' droids... As for Rey, she was a little too good at everything, but the dialogue, characters (overall), pacing, et al were far superior to any previous Star Wars film excluding Rogue One. Ep 8 had no redeeming features, to me. The ham-fisted message of 'women good, men bad'…
/r/MensRights09/07/18 01:06 PM
2

:) Good point, I have no idea what that would be called. My bad.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 12:58 PM
6

LARP = Live Action Role Play. You can't LARP online.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 08:13 AM
5

Honestly, I think most fans would be ecstatic if they just said the previous episode one was terrible and didn't happen, then write what should have been. There was so much crap in that film that ticked off everyone, feminist fan or normal fan, the only people who'd be upset are feminists who never liked Star Wars to begin with.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 08:10 AM
5

I deliberately read the article on CBC; I want to reqard them (with clicks at least) for reporting on issues facing men.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 01:23 PM
1

Two or three months, if I recall correctly. It was only after a third party investigation (which turned up next ot nothing).
/r/MensRights09/05/18 12:01 PM
1

Weir wasn't kicked out while being investigated, and Moore is unable to participate in most of the party duties.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 12:00 PM
1

That could apply to every system of economics. Capitalism certainly has its suffering.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 11:59 AM
3

Further additional layer: Aaron Weir is on the autistic spectrum and can't read non-verbal cues.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 11:55 AM
2

Umm... the US? Dr. Kellog and the Puritans who heavily influenced the US were extremely pro-circumcision as it was believed to reduce the sin of 'self-pleasure.' Christians were/are very anti-sex outside of procreation. Look at all of the abstinence only sex-ed in the States, for example, or how any nudity raises the rating of movies or games by a large amount (almost always to Adult at minimum) while violence doesn't.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 12:59 PM
2

Signed.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 12:38 PM
0

Is there one that looks a bit more... reputable? This one is full of editorialising and insults. There are plenty of resons to fire her, and ways of framing her comments/actions, without stooping to her level.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 10:04 AM
17

He didn't answer. It wasn't 'mansplaining' (I hate that word), but it wasn't answering.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 07:46 AM
4

It can be, but Ford didn't answer the question.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 07:45 AM
1

There's also initiating trade wars with allies, threatening nuclear war, he's waffling on abortion rights (sometimes for, sometimes against), supporting white extremists (I agree that Antifa is also bad), using racially charged language, and is working on dismantling democratic protections (openly attacking the Supreme Court, the FBI, independent judicial bodies such as special councils, talking about eliminating term limits, etc...). He's also the first to call for the imprisonment of political…
/r/MensRights06/03/18 07:19 AM
1

Maybe. That's why I put day in front of month as the Europeans do. It's one of the advantages of being Canadian; you can pick and choose which of the two formats you prefer in so many different grammatical ways.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 02:15 PM
1

The Republicans still haven't begun dealing with it, and neither have the Democrats. Trump is extreme even compared to the Tea Party. As a Canadian, the polarization in the USA is frightening, and I'm seeing it happen more and more, here. We often lag 10-20 years behind you guys in political swings. We have the Rebel to your Breitbart, and the CBC is very openly feminist. Harper was a milder form of George W. and Trudeau of Obama.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 02:11 PM
3

Me? When replying to an official e-mail/letter requiring confirmation upon receipt, that's... pretty much what you say. And 'Please find attached "x"' when sending an attachments.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 09:07 AM
1

It some areas. Boys only camps and girls only camps are a bit different.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 09:05 AM
2

Soy emulates estrogen in the body, some plastics do, too, and both have been increasing in Western civilization for decades.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 09:10 AM
5

I'm not overly fussed about the deficit, though I'd prefer to get back in the black sooner than later, I am fussed about all the money going to help women in the National Housing Strategy when the majority of the homeless are men. That and all the other programs for women when they're already ahead (education, for example.)
/r/MensRights28/02/18 07:57 AM
2

No more extreme than those where women, in my experience, feel they can't wear the same dress twice. We likely have different experiences and views on this, but that's all I can comment on.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 11:35 AM
3

Nothing, if they were appointed on merit and it just happened that the most appropriate people were women. Going out specifically to appoint a judge because they were a women is gross sexism, just as it would be to do the same for a man.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 11:30 AM
1

Fashion designers do. I'm gay and don't care, some do. Some straight guys care, many don't.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 11:00 AM
1

You're right on casual clothing. The topic in the post was social events, which I, perhaps mistakenly, viewed as formal. Suits and tuxedos are the only permitted attire, and the only colours for most men are black, navy, and grey.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 10:56 AM
69

No one will comment on the man's clothes because men have no (socially accepted) choice in clothing, minus a few minor variations on shade and colour.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 12:04 PM
7

Yeah, if there are any degrees that should have your opinions placed straight into a dumpster, these are them.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 01:38 PM
3

Agreed. Any last name or none.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 01:37 PM
12

This is Canada, not the States. We have different standards -- Freedom of Expression as opposed to Speech -- and there are legal limitations built right into the Charter around it. Likewise, vanity plates are a privilege; provinces aren't required to permit any vanity plates at all. However, I agree, someone's last name should be permitted, particularly given how long he's had the plate.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 09:14 AM
7

I disagree. I can't figure out what people see in Ruffalo while I think Downey is very good looking.. not Hemsworth in Thor hot, but still good looking.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 01:24 PM
10

If, and I stress if your claims are true, then we should routinely extract toenails from babies right after birth. They can harbour bacteria and fungi, become ingrown, and all other claims you made (other than STDs) also apply to toenails.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 09:52 AM
9

Nope. You're way off. Within a day of Brown facing these troubles the Liberal MP Kent Hehr was removed from his ministry position pending an investigation. He's still a Liberal MP, for now, but may be booted from caucus. Two other Liberal MPs were kicked out of caucus last year, too.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 12:00 PM
8

I go to r/Canadapolitics instead. There are very right wing and left wing people on there, plus a decent number of moderates. It's fairly balanced, with generally unbiased mods. About 2/3 of the comments seem to be at least mildly opposed to this BS.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 11:56 AM
3

Guilty until... nope, just guilty.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 02:29 PM
3

It's the title of an essay/book by Sally Miller Gearhart The Future -- If There Is One -- Is Female (1983). In it she calls for a genocide of men.
/r/MensRights25/01/18 09:28 AM
9

Then Jewish and Muslim men can get circumcised when they reach the age of majority and have free will to choose to follow that tradition or not.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 09:41 AM
2

That is a hate message, through and through. The title of Sally Gearhart's book The Future --If There Is One -- Is Female is the book in which she calls for the genocide of men. By posting signs and shirts with that message, these people are implicitly supporting genocide.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 09:38 AM
3

Look up Sally Gearhart and her book The Future -- If There Is One -- Is Female. In it she actually calls for a genocide on men. You could also see Julie Bindel of The Guardian as she called for all men to be locked up in concentration camps. Truth is stranger than fiction...
/r/MensRights20/01/18 10:49 AM
1

Actually, no, and I speak from personal experience :/ Some people get their nose out of joint if they get turned down, regardless of reason. As for backlash of this scale, you're probably right.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 08:55 AM
3

I'm gay and I don't find women attractive. I won't have sex with a trans person because I don't find the trappings of a woman attractive. I guess I'm as bad as you.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 06:55 AM
5

The routes through BC from the lower 48 into Alaska for those small pilots are treacherous as well with few airports of any size (or services), limited communication, and hazardous terrain. The tiny airlines contracted out to service remote communities are infamous for cutting corners on airplane maintenance, overworking pilots, and pressuring their pilots to fly in poor weather. Not a safe job.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 08:43 AM
8

What's wrong with 'whilst'? It's a fun word.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 07:21 AM
8

? That makes no sense. If you don't find me attractive, I'm disappointed, if I was attracted to you first. Otherwise, you're attracted to what you're attracted to, end of story. Should I be offended if someone doesn't like spaghetti and call them Italiophobes? Now, if you want to beat me up because I asked you out for coffee...
/r/MensRights06/01/18 07:14 AM
2

Thanks for the kind words, even if they're not directed at me. It's nice to read comments like these.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 02:37 PM
8

Look at the founder of the first Gender Studies (Women's Studies predated it by two years): Sally Gearhart. She's the one who advocated for a genocide of all men, minus a small breeding stock. How could Gender Studies be anything but anti-male?
/r/MensRights04/01/18 07:11 AM
4

Don't forget Julie 'Lock All Men Up' Bindel works there, too.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 07:06 AM
1

Perhaps. Given Trump's track record, an argument could be made for my point.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 08:22 AM
1

It was a good thing, but was that to help men or to cancel something Obama did? Everything I see Trump do appears to be revoking Obama policy/actions, like Net Neutrality.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 09:23 AM
11

I have no idea. I haven't seen a single thing about him that'd indicate he cares about men's rights. Rich people's rights, sure, taking away people's rights, definitely, but helping men writ large? No.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 02:30 PM
2

Good point, the repair job should have been switched to baking cookies or some-such.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 09:08 AM
2

I was feeling a little sad that no hot guy (or any guy) has complimented or flirted with me. Those comments aren't the best ('too hot to work there', a stranger could have no idea why someone is working somewhere), but not outrage inducing.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 09:06 AM
2

Corporations did essentially do that until unions formed. It was unions that created the five day, forty hour work week, not big business. Corporations hired muscle to beat, maim, or kill union leaders, until the government stepped in and legislated protections for unions. Corporations are still fighting to destroy unions, but have stopped hiring goons and turned to hiring politicians. Look at any 'work to right' state as an example.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 02:03 PM
3

Eh, Obama and Hillary may be 'left' in the USA, but not really anywhere else. The Democrats are, in many ways, to the right of the traditional (pre-Harper) Conservative party.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 01:48 PM
1

As I stated, Canada is a social capitalist regime. Not socialist, and not capitalist. We have social programs: welfare, universal healthcare, government pension, employment insurance... Those fly directly in the face of capitalism. It's a government providing social services. Any public infrastructure is a form of socialism in the strict sense of the word, as are any laws protecting workers' rights. If you want pure capitalism, you'll never find it on Earth, even in the worst period of the Indus…
/r/MensRights01/12/17 07:17 AM
1

Soviet Russia wasn't real communism, anymore than Canada practices real capitalism. It was a dictatorial cult of personality cloaked by communism-- a blend of both, but heavy on dictatorship. Canada is socialist capitalism. I agree with Goldman.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 01:47 PM
2

Reminds me of this grant based on Sally Gearhart -- the feminist who called for the genocide of 80% of all men.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 08:08 AM
14

Am I allowed? I'm already toxic and the ultimate expression of misogyny. (Gay man, BTW)
/r/MensRights15/11/17 02:20 PM
15

They make a lot of money off of it. They get money from any meetings with the parents beforehand, money for the surgery, and money for selling the foreskin to cosmetics companies. Thousands of dollars (or more) for, what, ten minutes of work? Thirty, tops?
/r/MensRights30/09/17 01:45 PM
2

I tend to view myself as centre-left overall, but I detest the whole identity politics and SJW-type behaviour. It makes it hard to vote for the parties I agree with on most other areas.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 10:42 AM
1

In my thought it's about disposability, and if more women worked in these fields more attention would be paid to on the job deaths. In the early 2000's, I can't remember the year, there was a province in Canada (BC?) that saw a spike in women's deaths after more entered the forestry sector. It led to over a week of hand-wringing on CBC and CTV about how horrible it was that women comprised 10% of the deaths that year. On the job deaths should receive more attention regardless of who dies.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 10:37 AM
1

It is about choice, to a degree, but it's also about the choice of employers to cut corners in the name of 'acceptable risk.' No one should have to go to work wondering if they'll be going home in a car or a hearse (yes, I know, the hearse would go to a morgue, not their house...) especially not to save their boss a few dollars.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 10:32 AM
2

Quite the opposite. I don't want more women to die -- I want less deaths overall. This, I hope, would show in a far more understandable way exactly how disparate the rates of accidents and deaths on the job are, and might lead to a push for greater safety measures. There are laws and policies in place, but they rarely get enforced beyond a slap on the wrist. Edit: fixed gender in first sentence.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 10:29 AM
1

Teachers are positions of authority, as are firefighters and other emergency services personnel. I would've thought lawyers would be, too, though jurisdictions may differ on this subject.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 06:10 AM
7

In Canada that'd be legal if she wasn't a teacher. I don't know if that's the same in the UK, but I believe it is. Edit: clarity
/r/MensRights10/06/17 01:33 PM
2

That's so prejudiced. They're hockey igloos, eh?
/r/MensRights25/04/17 11:02 AM
8

So is she American/Fahrenheit stupid or Canadian/Celsius stupid? 'Room-temperature stupid' changes a lot when you cross the border :)
/r/MensRights25/04/17 07:50 AM
5

I know Hydrafacial is one. It's an appropriate name as both hydras and the product have lots of heads... edit for clarity
/r/MensRights21/04/17 01:22 PM
1

Thank you. I hate the Rebel.
/r/MensRights14/04/17 01:20 PM
1

In most Commonwealth countries crimes aren't commited against a person, they're crimes against (a subject of) the Crown. The victim doesn't need to lay charges if the police have other forms of evidence, and they can be compelled to testify in court.
/r/MensRights17/12/16 01:59 PM
1

I thought her identity was known for a while: Jackie Coakley.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 04:17 AM
1

Medically necessary procedures are an entirely different ball of wax. I don't think any sane person would be against a blood transfusion after a major accident, organ transplants if an organ failed, or chemotherapy if the child has cancer. Putting a child through chemo just because his father had it done, however...
/r/MensRights20/07/16 10:24 AM
1

In that the same mentality behind men supporting MGM is behind women supporting FGM.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 10:21 AM
17

Emma Sulkowicz aka Mattress Girl.
/r/MensRights16/07/16 02:53 PM
4

This has nothing to do with your religion. When you (plural/collectively) become an adult (as determined by the age of consent in the country you live in), go right ahead and cut off any part of your own body that you want to. Leave newborns and children out of it. Let them make up their own mind when they're old enough to do so.
/r/MensRights13/07/16 08:10 AM
13

A hellhole with a better standard of living than the States.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 03:01 PM
5

Yup, and if it's done through e-mail, then there is a papertrail. Extra evidence if the prof didn't make a mistake.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 09:23 AM
1

I'm not an 'effeminate' man, I'm a man that likes other men. You have no more right to define a 'man' than a feminist does.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 02:36 PM
1

Gay guys? Split the bill is the default, but often (if it's a first date and it went well) the guy who asked the other out offers to pay. On future dates, my experience is taking turns (with the guy who makes more 'coincidentally' going to nicer restaurants on his turn). No idea about lesbians, but I assumed it was this method, too. Really, I was shocked this wasn't standard among straight couples now.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 10:40 AM
2

I didn't; it was a toss-up between a right-wing Christian nutjob and a Muslim terrorist. Both kill gay men and have done so for ages.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 04:18 PM
2

The sexual clothing women wear in games that, in the non-fantasy games, can be seen worn be real women? The oft-referenced Tomb Raider (original) has Lara Croft wearing clothes that cover more than the clothing I see women wearing every day in summer. If I end up seeing fewer chain mail bikinis, well, I'd be happy, but I despise this hypocritical BS. Where's the call to end the sexism in romance novels or the rags sold by checkouts in the supermarket that women buy? PS: I did find it incredibly …
/r/MensRights14/06/16 04:01 PM
13

Incorrect. When England and France signed a peace treaty (Treaty of Paris, 1763), France surrendered Quebec, Cape Breton Island, and the east bank of the Mississippi. England surrendered St Pierre et Miquelon, the French West Indies, restored French trade stations in India, and the French slave trading centre in (now) Senegal. Quebec was never conquered, it was traded. On another note, Quebec was tiny. It was the Gaspe peninsula, and the St Lawrence down to Hull. The rest was British territory g…
/r/MensRights24/04/16 07:31 PM
6

She's Twitter's Grand Inquisitor; she does still have influence.
/r/MensRights04/04/16 01:06 AM
14

What I don't get is why these people so very rarely get called out for the 'endure 9 months of pregnancy' when women very rarely know they're pregnant until after several months (4-ish) and can even go into labour before they know. Yeah, that sounds so horrible /s. (Yes, I know some women go through hell during pregnancy, but they're as much an outlier as the ones who don't know until labour). Edit: grammar/clarity.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 12:41 AM
4

I can wank, but not as well. I'm circumcised and gay; the circumcised penis doesn't work nearly as well as the uncircumcised ones. Either way, that doesn't change the reason people had for pushing the surgery in the States back then any more than it changes the reason Dr. Kellogg invented corn flakes.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 02:34 AM
2

Offhand? No, I'm afraid not; I saw it a while ago in this subreddit.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 09:14 PM
10

The same survey was provided to men (not by the original researchers or feminists), and it came back with a 1 in 6 stat.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 12:27 AM
3

No, because they're still men. He likely thinks they commit crimes because they're men despite their race, rather than because they're poor or just assholes -- and assholery belongs to all races and genders.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 09:10 PM
7

And she actually wore more clothes than many women (late teens into twenties) walking around any city does. I agree some character models are rather sexist -- the whole chainmail bikini thing -- but having a female character wear clothes real women wear with a body structure you can see on normal women isn't sexist. Edit: grammar.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 11:44 PM
7

There are men with the same personality/mindset necessary to carry out this sort of activity. If you look at soccer, you'll see vast numbers of men pretending to be victims, short term, and during wartime, men will fake injuries and such to avoid conscription. If there aren't many cases of this sort (pretending to be raped and/or kidnapped), there'd have to be societal reasons, such as believing playing a victim wouldn't help or that the consequences wouldn't make it worth the risk.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 07:21 AM
1

I really don't care if people thank god. They can do it all they want. It's rather arrogant to think that people wouldn't care if the only person thanked publicly was someone who didn't do any work, though. Why not thank the lawyer, too? Is adding two words too much trouble for you folks? Or is thanking someone else not giving god enough credit? I do see how that line of thought is awful; it's a variation of the one taken by the religious right all the time, but it isn't what I've been saying. I…
/r/MensRights08/11/15 09:03 AM
11

What about the right to listen to guest speakers? The right to free speech? The right to peaceably assemble? The right to learn? To think? There is no threat of violence to anyone -- from those who wanted to listen to Milo -- and thus no rational reason to prevent him from speaking. Should all pastors be banned from making speeches to Theology students because some Christian views are distasteful to others? Should capitalists be banned from making speeches because communists disagree with them (…
/r/MensRights08/11/15 07:59 AM
1

I'm not insulted. I'm not his lawyer and I've done nothing for him. Likewise, you may not think it's insulting at all, or that if someone gets offended for god getting all of the credit for their work, they're in the wrong, but you're only you. You have no right to say whether this lawyer's feelings are warranted or not, nor anyone else's. I was, at no point, ever talking to you either before you spoke to me. I saw a comment from someone who appeared to have similar thoughts to me and commented …
/r/MensRights08/11/15 07:28 AM
-5

Why? How much studying did god do to become a lawyer? How many hours did he spend in the office preparing the case? How eloquently did he speak in Doug's case? The lawyer deserves credit for the work the lawyer did. If Doug lost custody and had to pay half his salary in support for x years, would Doug have blamed god or the lawyer?
/r/MensRights07/11/15 07:31 AM
5

Maybe he put a Bible on the table in court and the judge had a sudden epiphany? Seriously, though, I don't see how people don't realize that's incredibly insulting to the people (lawyer/doctor/etc.) who put in all that time studying to be good at their profession.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 01:04 AM
1

Doesn't she believe she's entitled to every fruit of her labour, but ignores all the work others do to support the collective wealth of the nation? Doesn't she believe taxes are evil, even though they pay for the infrastructure everyone needs to prosper? That she's entitled to use society's benefits while offering nothing in return? Sounds entitled to me.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 11:11 PM
0

I don't think ad hominem means what you think it means. I made no comment about the previous commenter. The whole premise of Ayn Rand's philosophy, Objectivism, is self interest -- putting your goals, desires, and work ahead of any collective/national ideals. You know, the exact thing men's rights decry about modern feminism, and how they're working to advance women ahead of men. How everything should work toward their goals. They understand Ayn Rand very well, thank you very much. https://en.wi…
/r/MensRights03/11/15 11:07 PM
9

I can understand 1984 and Starship Troopers, but anything by Ayn Rand? No. Feminists already understand self-entitlement.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 08:12 PM
11

I have to both agree and disagree with your comment. The objectification of the male and female superheroes are different, but so are the sexualized aspects of men and women. What makes a man 'masculine' and sexy are the wide shoulders, narrow hips, and ripped muscles -- exactly what are exaggerated in male superheroes. For women, it's t&a, exactly what are exaggerated in female superheroes. I also feel that the male superheroes are just as bad in striking poses to show of their masculinity. Loo…
/r/MensRights29/10/15 07:42 AM
1

My point was that all of these bits (including the external parts of the nose and ears) can cause problems, but that doesn't they should be removed 'just in case.' I'm all for surgery when necessary -- as a last resort -- but routine circumcision is far from necessary and can cause problems more severe than it can prevent. Sure, the number of deaths are minuscule, as are serious complications, but are there any cases of irreparable harm directly attributable to possessing a foreskin (hygiene and…
/r/MensRights27/10/15 03:53 AM
1

HydraFacial. A cosmetic procedure available right here in Canada.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 03:29 AM
2

Should we then remove toenails and fingernails at birth? Get a pair of pliers and yank them out; they can get infected. Remove tonsils and appendices? No need for those. What about those pesky ear and nose flappy bits? Just remove the skin than if not properly cleaned will cause infection. It'll look perfectly normal in a few generations, then we can keep doing it so our children will fit in.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 03:27 AM
1

I thought this was more of a right-wing arguing style. Label everyone who disagrees with you a traitor and soft on terror until it convinces... blah, blah, blah. It's an ideologue arguing style. Neither left nor right, but those out of touch with moderation and common sense. It was extremely common in the post 9/11 Bush years, and just as common in the SJW world.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 11:11 PM
1

Yes, I quite agree about those quotes, but I still believe it to tangentially related; not fully related, but also not unrelated. I believe all ideologues, regardless of affiliation, despise opposing opinions and that's more of what this is than directly a men's rights issue. It's a very general and highly important issue.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 11:07 PM
9

This is only tangentially related to r/MensRights. While people attempting to discuss men's rights on campuses are often silenced, this article makes no mention of anything directly related to it.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 01:38 AM
19

It says right in the article that he'd pay the stipend and she would agree to work on the marriage. They're now divorced. Obviously, she failed to uphold her side of the agreement.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 08:36 PM
4

Well, for a bit there, I thought I'd absolutely hate the article -- when the author began offering excuses for the rapists -- but when she began quoting Dr Burrowes, I was quite pleased by the tone.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 01:15 AM
2

Perhaps she should be holding up a sign saying 'This is what a rapist looks like' then, too, because women also rape. Just ask that 11 year old boy who was raped by his babysitter.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 01:02 AM
4

How is discrimination against the needs of the military? If person A can pass the test and person B can pass the exact same test, isn't that all that matters? I don't give two figs about someone's race or gender if they can do the job just as well as the next person. I also expect the standards to be exactly the same, and the job itself to be exactly the same, as the next person. If they can't cut it, then they should be let go. No special favours, no sugar coating it, no 'advance peeks at the c…
/r/MensRights26/09/15 06:53 AM
4

For gay women, not gay people i.e. men.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 06:01 AM
10

Feminism has been as pro-LGBT as they are for equal gender rights: only when it helps women. They care nothing for gay men, only for how gay men can help them.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 06:00 AM
3

Was that before or after doctors began selling foreskin to cosmetic companies for products like HydraFacial? There's a lot of financial incentive now.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 10:58 PM
8

First article CNN Report In short, Feminists (and CNN) equated the religiously-based, return-to-the-1800's-gender-norms Return of Kings with the MRA. This is despite the fact -- the documented fact -- that the MRA says this guy isn't associated with them and the Return of Kings says his group isn't part of the MRA. His site even has posted a number of articles calling MRA 'whiny', just like feminists do.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 03:54 AM
1

So... for all the straight guys it's a condom -- which can fail, if rarely, or may not be used due to other reasons, such as alcohol or being informed she is on the pill (which may or may not be true) -- or celibacy. Beyond that, the ball is entirely in the woman's court. That's one other option beyond celibacy. Sounds rather unempowered to me.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 05:27 AM
1

Personally, I can't watch Thunderf00t's stuff because he is endlessly repetitive. He spends ten minutes showing five seconds of a single Sarkeesian quote in an eleven minute video (slight hyperbole).
/r/MensRights28/08/15 02:28 AM
8

Women could make the 'decision' not to have sex, too. Isn't that just another argument against abortions? It's still leaving men unempowered.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 12:07 AM
1

Women are more open to 'fabulous' clothing, and it's more fun to make outrageous things than tame cookie-cutter suits.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 01:17 AM
5

I do, too, but I'm gay. Most of my straight friends seem to prefer playing video games with female characters as the lead. One of them explained it as preferring to watch a sexy woman's ass for hours on end while playing the game than a man's. I have your view -- I can relate far more easily to male characters, and get more out of the story when it's from a male perspective (even in games where the perspective is essentially gender neutral like Mass Effect).
/r/MensRights20/07/15 10:22 PM
-2

As long as it's gay/lesbian incest there isn't any risk of inbreeding. That's the major moral issue, in my opinion. Well, also the issue of power differences. As the other commenter has said, you can't escape the issue of perceived power differences even in adults.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 06:58 PM
2

He did make the poster. He refused to engage in a hate campaign against a guy who made an anti-Sarkessian game, so they turned on him.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 09:00 PM
1

From what I saw on the news, he was talking about her on Twitter to other people. She looked up all of his tweets that mentioned her (which I guess you can do, I never used Twitter), and took that as him harassing her, even though she had to actively look for that information.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 08:59 PM
3

He realizes that's how insurance works. He has said as much. He's arguing that he doesn't think it should work that way. Take out demographics, charge the population x amount based on the average costs of the population, then add y or take away z as the individual's usage warrants.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 08:12 PM
28

The article seemed to glide right over the part where she kills her (male) accountant. Or that this was basically threatening the accountant she had a disagreement with in real life. The whole video sounds rather grotesque.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 05:56 AM
4

I'm gay, and I agree. A loving relationship is not oppressive regardless of the genders involved. You can be in a dream relationship whether you're gay or straight, or something out of your worst nightmares. To think otherwise is insanity.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 01:19 AM
2

Err... Uganda might be safe if you aren't gay. I really don't know about it's rate of street crimes to comment otherwise.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 03:46 AM
17

Which men are you referring to? In this context, these men are concerned about violence. Period. In one instance, violence is rightly considered horrible, in the other it is considered a joke. In both cases, the gender of the victim and attacker should be irrelevant, but sadly, that is not the case.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 11:32 PM
14

This should be higher. I didn't know that, as Canada doesn't use the term that way, either.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 07:05 PM
0

Canadian, not British. We also have freedom of speech, as part of our charter of human rights. And, hey, the NSA is also part of your government, along with, what, 30 other government organizations that regularly spy on you, censor you, shoot you, waterboard you, and perform extraordinary renditions. Yeah, pretty much any country in the western world has room to criticize the 'free' United States. The only people with freedom in your country are the bankers and billionaires. Furthermore, War of …
/r/MensRights05/06/15 06:32 PM
3

I agree. I don't fall under the 'left' spectrum in all aspects, as I try to consider the merits/demerits of each issue regardless of whether it's 'left' or 'right.'
/r/MensRights01/06/15 03:14 AM
17

And workplace deaths. A decade ago, there was a huge news blitz about how terrible it was that there had been a huge spike in the number of women being hurt or killed in the workplace from accidents in BC. They now accounted for 10% of all workplace accidents or deaths!
/r/MensRights31/05/15 06:18 PM
0

Gods. Where in the world did I say there was no grounds for legal action? I said you can't just go suing people. There are other legal avenues to pursue this, such as through the human rights tribunals. Y'know, the tribunal that deals with violations of human rights? Oh, sorry, I forgot Americans don't know about international law or human rights, just their own and believe the whole world works that way. But you guys like taking it in the ass from the NSA and Koch brothers.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 12:23 AM
1

You really are coming across as a bully and an asshole. He/she was pointing out that -- shock and horror -- there are places in the world that don't operate under American law! British law is a completely different beast and you can't just run around willy nilly suing everyone who gets your britches in a bunch.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 06:21 PM
3

Tabloid journalism? I take it you're familiar with the Winnipeg Sun. I lived there for several years, and it really is a tabloid rag masquerading as a newspaper.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 03:49 AM
1

Legally? No. Semantically? Yes. The common usage of the word certainly does cover that, but when talking about court cases and the legal system, there is a world of difference... and we were talking about harsher legal penalties.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 08:52 PM
3

Then that is not a false accusation, it's 'just' libel. For it to be a false accusation you need to lay charges.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 01:13 AM
12

"Schools are the social building blocks in an adolescent's life meant to teach them how to communicate and develop relationships with others..." And how to follow the policies and procedures set out by your employer. If your employer has a dress code, you don't intentionally wear prohibited clothing to work, throw a hissy fit when you're told you've violated said code, and then accuse your boss of promoting 'rape culture.' This child is now learning how the real world communicates and what not t…
/r/MensRights13/05/15 05:34 PM
-1

Those aren't human rights, they're rights bestowed by the state (States, in your case) and can be removed by the state. Also, in my opinion, if one acts in a way to violate the rights of another they need to have their rights curtailed to protect the rest of society.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 09:18 PM
1

I agree with that in cases where authority is not involved. I had sex with an adult when I was 13, and I don't believe I was coerced or harmed. There was no position of authority involved, and I was/am likely very much an outlier in this. Edit: Clear consent is very hard to determine when someone has a position of responsibility or some other power over the other.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 09:00 PM
4

Isn't the whole point of men's/women's rights to fight against old laws like this that are egregiously sexist? This is egregiously sexist, as are the examples you pointed out. Furthermore, who are you to say no heterosexual 16 year old male would be worse for wear? Sex means different things for different people, even in the same gender. For some it's purely physical (like me), while for others it holds deep emotional meaning. Edit: removed 'for' and added 'against' in the first sentence, as mea…
/r/MensRights29/04/15 06:15 AM
4

It's a position of authority. I fully agree that a 16 year old is usually able to know their own mind in this case (with outliers still being too immature) but not when authority is thrown in there. A teacher should never have sex with a student from their own school. It just increases the likelihood of harm that statutory rape laws are designed to protect against. I actually believe teen-aged men/boys need these protections more than girls since males mature far later, and it should be enforced…
/r/MensRights29/04/15 06:08 AM
8

I think it should be pointed out that this story did appear on the CBC National; one of the biggest news programs in Canada. This sounds like progress to me. It was finally a favourable report on men and sexual assaults saying that, yes, men can be victims and we, as a society, have been letting them down. With awareness can come progress.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 08:15 PM
2

I was reading that review and it's just so... out there that I can't believe it isn't someone trolling or making fun of that mindset (a la The Onion).
/r/MensRights11/12/14 12:31 AM
4

Is there a link for this? I'd be very interested to see what the various media outlets would say if someone contacted their consumer advocate departments like CBC's 'Go Public' or CTV's 'Consumer Alert.' Even a refusal to investigate would be noteworthy.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 06:14 PM
4

I agree. I think the point the OP is making is true, and I think it's deeply regretful. I expected to read the article at be outraged, but she makes very good points. Nudity -- non-sexual nudity as she describes -- isn't shameful or something children need to be protected from. It's part of the human condition and children should learn to accept their bodies for what they are. ALL of what they are.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 10:34 PM
2

I don't know why you got downvoted; I can't find the original post either.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 01:58 AM
1

From what I see, the white knight stepped in -- perhaps unnecessarily, but in a situation the harassers created -- and the guys in the car became violent. I see it as a random assault, and not much more. I do recognise your point that there is a societal expectation for men to step in, but frankly, Mr White Knight should have called the police if there was fear of violence, or recorded the harassment and presented it as evidence of such on the part of these punks. If a pattern of behaviour is es…
/r/MensRights11/08/14 10:27 PM
5

What does this have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights09/08/14 08:49 PM
26

They completely ignored the point the woman who runs 'Women Against Feminism' raised: yes, feminism did great things and was necessary, but we've moved beyond that. The feminists just kept trotting out all the good things feminism had done and ignored the very complaints raised about its current actions.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 11:38 PM
2

I fully agree. His personal attacks are inexcusable and do nothing but serve to keep the MRM marginalized. I think much of the original fights, the necessary original fights, of feminists in the Western world have been won and it's now time to bring the fight to establish true equality. Such isn't the case in most of the rest of the world. Please don't paint everyone in the MRM with the same brush because of some rude people.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 07:26 PM
1

And people point to comments like yours and call the MRA a hate movement. Getting the right to vote wasn't a non-issue, being recognised as 'people' under the law wasn't a non-issue, nor any of the original fights necessary to bring about equality. I don't understand why people are attacking bekkjarlalli so viciously. All of her (I'm assuming gender and apologise if wrong) original posts were well thought out and coherently stated. Debate her on those terms if you disagree -- with logic and cohe…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 07:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter