TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

platypod Archive

View 2 posts and 63 comments by platypod on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
16

Public defender? Are these criminal charges? You must have a lawyer!
/r/MensRights03/05/14 01:47 PM
3

Is plagiarism a criminal offence?
/r/MensRights30/11/13 04:22 PM
0

username is relevant
/r/MensRights27/08/13 02:35 PM
9

You want to fight like a man, better be ready to get hit like one.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 03:30 PM
1

Not exactly, they are certainly dramatized. There was an AMA for someone who'd been on Judge Judy a while back, who said that the way it worked is plaintiff and defendant agreed to be paid out of a pool of money, with the judgement determining what percentage each received. So, other than looking like a tool on television, there's no real downside to appearing on these shows, and it resolves your dispute, whether you agree or not, it's as binding as any other arbitration process that you agree t…
/r/MensRights18/08/13 03:21 PM
9

We seek not to race against the men, but to have our own professional field running in conjunction with the men's event, at the same time, over the same distances, on the same days, with modifications in start/finish times so neither gender's race interferes with the other. So... They don't actually want to ride in the Tour de France.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 09:14 PM
4

Also to re-establish circulation after re-attaching amputated digits.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 09:17 PM
1

This.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 09:04 PM
5

He was forced to give DNA samples, his fingerprints were taken along with intimate body samples before he was charged with indecent exposure DNA? Yup. Fingerprints? Perfectly standard. Intimate body samples? ... I don't even know what they're alluding to. What the fuck are british police doing to people? What more could they possibly need?
/r/MensRights04/05/13 12:52 PM
7

All articles are biased, I simply meant to point out that our situations are not parallel. That though nominally protected by laws guaranteeing equality, women in India (primarily rural women) are severely disadvantaged compared to men. Men are not subject to Eve Teasing (public sexual harassment) Disfigurement by acid Child Bride practices Female foeticide Bride burning Dowries dowry deaths India is the 4th most dangerous country in the world for women, and the most dangerous of the G20 countri…
/r/MensRights21/04/13 02:35 PM
7

I sincerely hope everyone here realizes that "Men's Rights" movements in North America are working to promote recognition of equality between the sexes, while "Men's Rights" in India are working to have women subservient in all respects to the whims of men. From the linked article, which believes that men are the oppressed sex and fights against Section 498 (a) of the Indian Penal Code, which criminalises cruelty to a woman by her husband or his relatives TL;DR - Unlike north america, men's righ…
/r/MensRights21/04/13 12:56 PM
6

Alright; it is a "public good" Reduced societal costs of healthcare for the unwanted children who, having been aborted, will not be serially abused for years. Reduced societal costs for trials, lawyers, and judges for the unwanted children, their mothers, and their fathers in cases of divorce, domestic violence, public disorder infractions. Reduced societal costs for the prison system to house one, the other, or both parents stuck together by their unwanted child (pursuant to being charged, abov…
/r/MensRights03/04/13 12:00 AM
9

I consider not being knee deep in unwanted children a public good. Obviously you disagree. I'm sorry?
/r/MensRights02/04/13 11:37 PM
8

As far as I know you cannot dictate to the government specifically how your tax dollars are spent. All you can do is elect politicians who you believe will best represent your interests.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 11:27 PM
26

I'm glad that women in France will have free access to contraceptives, and (should they require one) abortions. Giving people control over their lives is a good thing! Men being able to "opt-out" is a separate, but related, issue. We shouldn't be striving for equal oppression, but equal freedoms!
/r/MensRights02/04/13 07:05 PM
4

"Did you have sex with someone and later you regret your decision to have sex?" I didn't see anyone else mention this, so I must be the only one bothered...
/r/MensRights26/03/13 02:18 AM
14

Owning less than 1% of the world's property What percentage do men own? What percentage do governments own? What percentage do religious institutions own? What percentage do companies own? I'd expect the vast majority of "property" to be owned or held by organizations, not individuals. If (and it's a pretty big "if") women own 1% of the world's property, we need to know what percentage men own to put this in any context.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 06:12 PM
1

For all we know they drugs were prescribed. Given the rest of the story, a little lie by omission is nothing.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 06:08 PM
7

She alleged sexual assault 7 years after the fact, when her parents caught her looking at sexually explicit material online. Due to the timeframe they had to rely on victim and witness statements. Since there were no witnesses, it sounds like they simply took the victims/frauds statement, locked him up, and walked away whistling. Possibly congratulating themselves on a job well done... This is disgusting.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 05:55 PM
2

I believe that that's their example of 'legitimate' discrimination.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 01:00 PM
1

Well, any loophole is going to come down to money in the end. From the Alberta Human Rights Commission The leading cases in reasonable and justifiable discrimination have dealt with discrimination in the area of employment. Employment, in the context of human rights law, includes any activity related to employment. The term employment is given a "large and liberal" interpretation in order to ensure that the law's protection covers all those who need it. In the cases included in the case summarie…
/r/MensRights04/03/13 04:08 AM
2

On the face of it it violates the gender equality provision of the Alberta Human Rights Act - area 1 (Employment - including applications, advertisements and interviews), grounds 6 (Gender). That said, I'm not an internet lawyer, and there's a money loophole (if you have enough money, it's easy to buy the paperwork to use the loophole) so...
/r/MensRights03/03/13 03:10 PM
1

I've sent them a message... I'm sure they'll figure it out. The old standby of a severed horse head in the bed, by chance?
/r/MensRights03/03/13 02:36 PM
-2

I know the university has since stopped, but why any university would want to get into the business of non-judicial legal proceedings (it's an "honour" court, so we're cool, right?), and why if you were the victim of a criminal act (say, rape?) you'd go to this "honour court" instead of reporting it to the police is completely beyond me. Unless you were a childish vindictive individual, looking for the process with the lowest standard of evidence, and highest potential impact on your target's li…
/r/MensRights02/03/13 02:27 PM
1

Yes, as far as very petty theft, dealing with it at the scene and without need for further action is one of the best things that can happen. All the rest of that $#!+ should have been dealt with.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 05:59 PM
-1

The demand would have to be "if you make us pay, we'll cry rape". This wasn't the case, they cried rape regardless. Simply not paying is theft (or theft of service, or whatever the local statutes list it as).
/r/MensRights01/03/13 05:57 PM
3

Absolutely.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 05:56 PM
-4

Blackmail (or extortion) as I mentioned above doesn't apply - no demand was made. It requires coercion.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 04:25 PM
-7

It's $13 - the police can easily say "pay the cabbie now, or we arrest you for theft, don't be f*cking stupid..." And really, that's one of the best things that can happen - cabbie gets paid immediately, police get to go on to other priorities, court system doesn't get tied up.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 03:51 PM
7

Given the state's financial interest in child support payments (they take a cut, remember), the time limits imposed for testing (you proved too late that they aren't yours, keep paying), not to mention the need for family medical history in diagnosing inherited ailments, I absolutely think that paternity testing should be mandatory at birth.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 03:15 PM
-8

Is it? (Genuinely curious) Perjury is lying during testimony in court. Filing a false report may require more than "someone called 911, the police came out, took statements, reviewed a video, and decided no charges were warranted" It wasn't extortion - they didn't say "if you try to make us pay, we'll claim sexual assault" they just flat out made the claim. It might be slander - but it's unclear to me, under Manitoba's Defamation Act, whether it qualifies at all. They seem concerned more with ne…
/r/MensRights01/03/13 02:59 PM
5

Does the remaining balance come out of his estate when he dies? When he pays doesn't matter, either way this man and his family suffer.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 02:14 PM
4

And some of the money should be put into an account in trust for the child, for education, when the payments reach a decent amount.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 02:10 PM
3

Yes! Why we don't paternity test at birth I don't know
/r/MensRights27/02/13 08:51 PM
4

I don't get it, this isn't like the earlier story with the military officer who was told he'd filed too late. This guy has his paternity test, and simply hasn't admitted it to the court yet. Of course, even if they do recognize reality, and stop support payments, what do you think the chances are that he'll ever get his money back? Yeah. There should be no support payment without a paternity test. If it's in the "child's best interest" that somebody pay, let it come out of the judge's salary. Bu…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 04:03 AM
3

I don't even know what to say when I read these things...
/r/MensRights25/02/13 08:51 PM
-1

I agree, why we pay attention to these walking egos is beyond me.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 08:07 PM
3

Me If someone is harassing her, and won't take no for an answer, how do they deserve and better than to be handed some random digits? You Why do you assume that men won't take no for an answer? Your posts would make more sense if you responded to what was written, and not what you read. There seems to be a clear disconnect between the two.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 03:03 AM
3

ThePlasmid I think I gave out a fake number once and it was due to repeated attempts of me telling him I didn't want to give out my number so I finally said fine so that I could be left alone. Chocoboat Yeah... I think the fake number tactic is completely justified sometimes. There are some aggressive assholes out there who won't take no for an answer. Are we in the same thread?
/r/MensRights25/02/13 02:59 AM
3

She goes there hoping to meet a partner who interests her. Or to be with her friends for an evening. Or some other reason that she shouldn't be judged for. If someone is harassing her, and won't take no for an answer, how do they deserve and better than to be handed some random digits? When did /r/MensRights become /r/BashWomen? We would all come off better, and be viewed more favourably, if we kept our discourse to rational topics of inequality, and stayed as far from the childish whining of ra…
/r/MensRights25/02/13 02:50 AM
2

The case stated above was that a fake number was given when the "No, I'm not interested" option had been tried repeatedly and failed. In this case the woman does have case for concern - her would be suitor has already shown that he has no respect for her boundaries, and is actively behaving in a manner that is harassing.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 02:44 AM
1

You only think it is sexist because I am proposing two different rates Correct, you are proposing different rates based solely on sex. This is the definition of sexism. You seem to be operating under the assumption that an individual should pay more into the system to get more out of the system. This is incorrect. The amount that all income earning individuals contribute is calculated to support all recipients. This is pretty much the definition of a social assistance program. Does it also bothe…
/r/MensRights24/02/13 02:26 AM
1

I thought we were talking about retirement benefits?
/r/MensRights24/02/13 02:20 AM
6

Not true. Some women may draw benefits longer. Some won't. Some men will, some won't. Equality is treating everyone the same - either the same retirement age, or the same formula for individual retirement age. The "solution" you propose is the very sexism we're fighting against.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 04:26 PM
4

Based on statistical evidence, which is updated and adjusted frequently. If you can apply a formula to retirement age, that would be fine, but arbitrarily assigning numbers is not. I don't want to see us turn reactionary and become the male version of the crap we're working against. Equality for all.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 03:58 PM
13

The fuck is this crap? We are fighting for equality here, everyone gets the same retirement age.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 03:00 PM
16

Not to be an ass, but if his wife divorced him, and his son committed suicide, it doesn't sound like he has much family left. Venting overwhelming feelings here is perfectly acceptable.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 07:07 PM
6

Interesting that the article only reports on the midwife's case, and suspended sentence. Of course there's no mention of charging the parents for hiring someone to harm their child. For the record practicing female genital mutilation is a criminal act in the UK, and in 2004 legislation extended the law to cover parents taking their children abroad to be mutilated. But I guess men are fair game.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 03:20 AM
1

This is disgusting. In the interest of full disclosure, I'm circumcised. But I remember it being done (I was 7 or 8 at a guess?) and it was done at the recommendation of my doctor. My brother and father are not circumcised. I always thought that that was how it happened. That it was only done if medically necessary. I knew that it was tradition for Jews to be circumcised (and that for some the "ritual" involves the Mohel sucking blood from the wound with his mouth. Which blows my freaking mind.)…
/r/MensRights06/02/13 06:41 PM
1

Thank you. So how do doctors who perform medically unnecessary procedures on the unwilling remain licensed?
/r/MensRights06/02/13 11:28 AM
3

I don't understand - what medical reason is there to circumcise an infant? And if it isn't medically necessary, why the hell would a doctor do it?
/r/MensRights06/02/13 02:21 AM
2

That makes sense. It's a disgusting practice, but it does make sense.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 06:01 AM
5

I hate to say it, but from that video I have some sympathy for the women. All the cop should have said was "After fully investigating the matter, we have determined there is insufficient evidence to support a charge." She can't sit there and accuse the women of lying if she isn't going to follow up with charges.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 04:19 AM
22

How often do you read the equivalent of "Well miss, you've been found guilty, and we could sentence you to prison, but that would deprive your children of their mother, so here's parole instead." Have you ever read something similar about removing a father from their children?
/r/MensRights03/02/13 03:49 AM
1

Nope, they crazy.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 08:10 PM
2

/r/ShitRedditSays (as detailed in it's sidebar) is part of the 'fempire' and ( as detailed in the side bar of /r/SRSWomen ) here are some of the rules : Men = Benned. No one cares if ur a cis dude or what ur cis dude penis thinks. Being a misogynist, ableist, white supremacist, transphobic, homophobic, creepy chucklefuck also gets you benned. You post in MR? Thats great, Ben. Misandry? DONT REAL. NO BAN Basically there's a whole lot of hatred against men.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 07:59 PM
2

SRS = /r/shitredditsays
/r/MensRights27/01/13 04:24 PM
0

Every once in a while, eat many!
/r/MensRights26/01/13 06:27 PM
–

Interesting. I wonder what the justification was.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 04:43 PM
–

Honest question from a guy who doesn't have children, and only has the slightest idea of how brutal a divorce can be, but - If the court order dictates when you can have the child, and the ex-wife doesn't produce the child when required, how is this not kidnapping? Someone up-thread mentioned that the police can't do anything except stand witness to civil matters, which makes sense. But kidnapping is a criminal matter. Why should you have to argue about contempt of court charges which may or may…
/r/MensRights25/12/12 07:03 PM
3

Ah. Then best of luck to you my friend. Even representing yourself discussing the situation with a lawyer familiar with family law could be very beneficial. I get the impression these days that our courts are specifically set up to exclude the average individual.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 05:23 PM
–

Is there a reason that you don't have 50/50 custody?
/r/MensRights23/12/12 05:05 PM
3

That is disgusting.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 06:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter