TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

pleasedrowning Archive

View 1 post and 61 comments by pleasedrowning on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
11

Legal Rightspleasedrowning/r/MensRights06/12/22 01:37 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Run! Cut your losses. This isn't someone you have a good future with. You clearly know this already. Trust yourself
/r/MensRights06/01/23 03:33 AM
1

I actually agree with her. I ask to take her out, I choose where, I pay. If she makes the request, she pays... If we go as a group, with other people, then we likely split the bill. Hence double dates are a thing. I do take note if she offers though. Obviously.
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/22 03:34 PM
11

It's not about the graph, it's about the username... It's about the author of the tweet knowing their audience and garnering maximum amount of views. If you criticize the media, you have to know how they work... Your off base here. The data regarding the rate of suicides doesn't matter, what matters is the click through rate for this audience on such a tweet... You are seeing more of this now among make audiences. Male eyeballs are being commoditized more as office jobs increase
/r/MensRights31/12/22 02:18 PM
15

You must admit, this particular war in Ukraine has far more overarching geopolitical consequences then what's giving on in Iran. One theatens nuclear weapons use, determines how much the UN and US till tolerate with respect to an aggressive state attacking states that are not in the UN and the possible reshaping of eastern and western Europe. These are just bigger issues with more people effected when t comes to Ukraine. Women included. Children included. Men included. The other is the same theo…
/r/MensRights14/12/22 01:06 PM
5

Really... Iran is a shit show... Again. Everyone is tired of it, again? Color me surprised. Everyone is talking about Ukraine because nuclear war can pop off... Bigger fish
/r/MensRights14/12/22 12:44 PM
2

Ok I really think you should watch this: https://youtu.be/9WLqAN4DWac It will make more points far more quickly then I could. It's good to hear gay guys recognize these issues. I know there are plenty out there and the way gay men are depicted is cartoonish.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 02:08 PM
5

Frankly, I'm straight "white" male...(ethnically jewish) I find the idea that your sexual preference identifies you indefinitely is idiotic. Tastes shift with time. People hopefully grow. These communities want to capture individuals into sets of ideas and politics early... Much the church... And keep them there. This is done for that communities benefit, not it's members. I also find it far better basing things on the facts... Ignoring preferences. Your gay if you willingly had sex with the sam…
/r/MensRights10/12/22 01:59 PM
2

As a straight guy I'm very good to hear someone addressing gay men as neutered and "safe." The depiction of male hetero sexuality as violent or predatory and, in turn, male homosexuality as flaccid and tame. Like Dave Chappelle said: Nothing more gangster then fucking another guy in the ass. Ps 2 words, Jeffrey Dahmer... Fuck...
/r/MensRights10/12/22 01:27 PM
1

Not me... Just noticed it... Figured I'd crosspost. Anyone that can actually help can jump over and do so.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 02:17 PM
2

It's good to hear a well thought out understanding of political operations. However, we must realize also that feminism has captured itself in a death spiral, it started painting a narrative that got sold to the next wave of feminists themselves without grounding in fact. With each successive generation of the political movements understanding of it's core principles shifted, leaving tactics and power to be unified center. This framework is all too common and can be seen in all political movemen…
/r/MensRights06/12/22 02:04 PM
3

Wtf? Collect your thoughts before commenting
/r/MensRights06/12/22 02:40 AM
4

I concur, there is allot of infantilization of women. Some feminism fought this at one period of time. I'm not aware if the mainstay of feminism still has any of those feminists left.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 02:38 AM
10

Can I ask, did you have a stable family life? I get the feeling some of these women had something missing. That much of this is projection of feelings toward those closer to them.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 07:33 PM
1

Personally I am a libertarian politically.I rarely concern myself with others. , I have that luxury. Limiting government is paramount in my view. Direct democracy can't work, it's been tried... Representative democracy add a necessary limit on the bedlam that is government. The real issue is when the ruling greed and intelligence outstrips their wisdom. Wisdom being long-term consideration while intelligence being processing power and capability . For example, flirting with nuclear war isn't wis…
/r/MensRights04/12/22 06:32 PM
1

https://youtu.be/ZYUSUcVSG4s Here is a short video. Id suggest to dive deeper on this. The face of power and reality of it is vastly different. Just because the a monarch supposedly has power though his bloodline, this doesn't mean he does.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 04:28 PM
1

The issue that if you are given 4 years in power, people tend to use that 4 years at maximum efficiency to benefit themselves and their own. There's is minimal regard for the future beyond your term. There is a lack of incentive to guard against risk as leadership is protected from its consequences. It's like a rental car with insurance, you certainly don't care for it the same as you would your own car. The book doesn't make a case for traditional monarchy. It's not perfect but it makes good po…
/r/MensRights03/12/22 01:29 PM
0

I am not concerned with which system is smart or dumb. I want a system that minimizes harm. This book makes a decent case that having a train run on a nation with a new set of pricks every 4 years isn't ideal for the people of that nation.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 11:11 PM
0

No we aren't agreeing on that. Book makes the case that democracy is fucked, the basis of which is voting.. so women shouldn't be voting, neither should men. It's actually a good argument Not involved then this but: Democracy is essentially a government that's publicly owned with too many divergent interests. Those at the head have short in terms where they have influence and profit. This leads to raping the country and running. A monarch, on the other hand, l may be brutal if he so chooses but …
/r/MensRights02/12/22 03:05 PM
5

The sex goes tits up ? Giggidy
/r/MensRights01/12/22 11:49 PM
3

Everyone has their own idea of female male relationships but marriage is a legal contract. Marriage is entirely a different thing. You tie your finances together... You for taxes together, you take on debt together. It's a business partnership. Many people date to find the person they can marry one day. In fact, that is the standard. If you have no intention to marry at all, regardless of your a man or a women... Make it clear. Sometimes marriage makes sense, sometimes not. However, if your lead…
/r/MensRights01/12/22 11:40 PM
1

My confusion remains regarding violence... Why exactly is it being painted in a bad light? At minimum it's a necessary evil... More likely, it's a keystone in the social structure of all human society and interaction.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 08:19 PM
1

Meh... Agreeing that women make poor policy isn't insisting women shouldn't be able to vote. 2 separate and district claims. PS I think you would be interested to know that not as few people are giving up on modern democracy as you would think. This makes a great case Democracy: The God That Failed https://g.co/kgs/rvvdoX
/r/MensRights01/12/22 12:47 PM
1

No, not feminism, read over the quote... It says women, the fact that a someone somewhere mentioned feminism in the same breath means nothing. Second, not all feminism is created equal. It is a blanket term used for a swath of POVs and political interest groups. Some better then others regarding your how they conduct themselves and with views significantly different from one another. One should remember that in all politics you play to your audience and their emotions for backing, both financial…
/r/MensRights01/12/22 12:21 PM
1

I will openly and clearly call those accusing Manson as irresponsible liars. They have little evidence and are wasting the courts time and our tax money. There are several women who had relationships with managing that have made YouTube channels to help mansions name. Check this out. https://youtu.be/g-MVUXye9MU
/r/MensRights29/11/22 01:16 PM
2

My tastes tend to get a bit avant-garde (like Einstürzende Neubauten) but I appreciate any good lyricist. Be that Marilyn Manson or Eminem. First time I took rap seriously was when I saw Eminem. Check out Saul Williams, great raper... Saw him on tour with nine inch nails. Particularly the song black Stacy. Here is the link: https://youtu.be/kRsgavuG4sg As for Dave Chappelle... Here is his SNL monologue many are calling antisemitic. The accusations are coming from the left mostly. https://youtu.b…
/r/MensRights28/11/22 11:37 PM
1

Saying your ready for an attack from another party is a fucked up thing to say? Why? Because it presumes the other party has a capacity for hostility? I would hope others recognize that compacity.. I'm honestly lost on that and I come from Jewish background. He is not denying the Holocaust... That's fucked up. How low is this bar regarding antisemitism?
/r/MensRights28/11/22 10:40 PM
1

Firstly, to the 16 year old that poster this, you are not a rapist because of your sex. What your seeing is social engineering... Remember, online isn't life. Social media is a place where people with too much time on their hands are used as useful idiots for structuring social movements. Second, imagine if we followed up all these statistics and dug deep, see who is committing these crimes... You know, murder and rape and such, according to the religious, cultural and ethnic background. Wonder …
/r/MensRights28/11/22 01:53 AM
1

Going to defcon 3 means your increasing your own readiness for an attack from another. "Force readiness" literally refers to your forces or military troops and military machinery.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 02:42 PM
2

Fuck... That's a wall of Text.. crap sorry
/r/MensRights27/11/22 02:38 PM
1

I highly recommend this: https://youtu.be/6V_sEqfIL9Q Very much on point. I'm not a fan on Ye but I never listened to his music. My tastes in anything close to rap is Saul Williams. https://youtu.be/kRsgavuG4sg Some Eminem I'll leave playing if it comes on the radio. I enjoy the lyrics So excuse any ignorance regarding Ye. I honestly don't know if there has been a pattern of behavior with respect to antisemitism but my understanding is there had not. That he is a father of 4 coming off a break u…
/r/MensRights27/11/22 02:37 PM
1

Actually, it does mean you defend Hitler on those points. Reasonably, I might add. That's the nuance and the rub. There is a significant difference between us though. I'm not a big believer in evil, too Abrahamic for me. Especially when used to vilify someone rather then a set of ideas. I try not to even use it entirely. The evil moniker tends to shuts down understanding and conversation. Its a baby with the bath water tactic. Which is what you just employed. Furthermore, insisting on the evil o…
/r/MensRights26/11/22 01:23 PM
0

It means “force readiness increased above normal levels”... Putting the statement out there can be read as "come at me bro... I'm ready...." To the Jewish media executives. Chastising a grown ass man and insisting on an apology is just stupid. Makes it seem like you have the power to force him to your whims... Reinforcing the very thing your concerned will create a problem.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 07:34 PM
1

I honestly don't think anyone knows what defcon 3 means... Clearly. Not even kanya ... Which makes this confusing. It's about readiness to deal with a threat. I'm not sure what he said regarding Hitler but it seems it's mostly here say... Other people talking to media about what they heard him say she that he read mein kemf and had admiration for the propaganda used by Nazis. Much of this can be said of me too... The use tactics used by the third Reich with regard to propaganda were staggering. …
/r/MensRights25/11/22 06:03 PM
0

Honestly, I don't see what was antisemitic... If like to actually see someone put a finger on it. This is coming from someone with Jewish lineage and a decent enough understanding of antisemitism. Some personal experience with it both in the States and outside the States, in a nation that actually committed genocides against it's jewish population both under the USSR and independently. Much like pointing out that blacks dominate the NBA isn't racist. Same goes for pointing out the involvement of…
/r/MensRights25/11/22 02:32 PM
0

The fact that he is smug is not in contention. That's part of his image and it is what it is. However, much of what he said was not antisemitic. I am saying this as someone of Ashkenazi lineage. Now, mind you...I may have not seen everything he said... But what I have isn't offensive. He stated clear and observable facts. Jews are in fact a huge part of the Hollywood dynamic. Jews tend to be lawyers, agents and executives. Now, if there is a complaint that they are conspiring every sabbath again…
/r/MensRights25/11/22 04:54 AM
1

Totally, plus they and their business interests and personal brands are protected by political interests. Be that lobbies in bed with Hollywood or think tanks backed by political parties. They use celebrities to advertise crap they wanna sell... In return celebrities get opportunities
/r/MensRights25/11/22 03:46 AM
1

looking up who Andrew Tate Oooh this frat boy douche... Ok I'm caught up. He was banned? I see his mug pop up on YouTube endlessly. It's honestly getting annoying. In the case of scholars and people of actual influence, (Peterson?) they are often tied into think tanks, which are funded by political interests, or have a degree of credible beyond running a personal brand and selling couching like Tate. They were protected and insulated. Fox it's afforded similar protections by Hollywood. She makes…
/r/MensRights24/11/22 05:09 AM
2

Honestly...I watched the interview. No one stunned anyone... It was a circus, the interview was a trapeze act with a net. Anything to keep the eyeballs of the audience locked in. It's just pandering to get attention. She could have just as easily shit in on the stage and rolled around in it and it would have the same effect.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 11:49 PM
3

Lol no they are celebrates... They pretend to be idiots clowns for the idiot masses.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 11:44 PM
4

Could argue the reason she is able to say such things is because no one takes her seriously. More to the point, no one takes women seriously.(particularly with like this, even other women) This is likely an attempt to shift the Overton window. But.... she is practically a caricature of a woman. An absurdity. A overt tactic. It's so hamfisted and trite that we know what it is instinctually. Nothing she is saying is serious, it is an opening move so later less extreme views seem mundane. In themea…
/r/MensRights23/11/22 11:42 PM
2

My first thought was: who the fuck is Julia Fox and why doesn't she wasn't men to have penises. It is clear now she just wants all the penises for herself. Lol. Anything to get attention Hollywood bs.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 10:34 PM
4

Agreed, but it also ignore the various other factors that have changed. For example, single partner working and able to afford a home without a college education.... Also women being marketed to far more too. That doesn't help. But the fact that women and mentally different on average then men on average... Is pretty clear.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 04:37 AM
6

Actually, I actively seek out the voices that get ad hominem attacks. Especially so if those attacks come from relatively intelligent people. That generally means they couldn't find a way to discredit this individuals argument. That means I want to hear it... It doesn't guarantee the argument is good but at least it is likely to be interesting or their tactics especially nuanced. (Not a good argument but a strong sophistry)
/r/MensRights22/11/22 04:27 AM
1

Equality in regards to rights is what's generally meant when people talk about equality in the realm of politics. This isn't equality in ability. This is not to be confused with equity either. My suggestion, familiarize yourself and your daughter with the idea of egalitarianism. It will give your daughter a good bullshit detector. Egalitarianism is the bedrock that feminism should be based on...if is not, it's a power play, it's politics, it's a special interest group that maintains itself first…
/r/MensRights22/11/22 04:15 AM
1

Your the one that brought up arguing with feminists, I followed the thought. Personally, I don't care for special interest groups. I find that when they archived their goals, they simply move the goal post because there is too much money and self interest involved. Too much politics. That applies to feminists and men's rights. But if I'm talking to an individual, male or female, when I find that when i frame things so my interests are not mutually exclusive from their own and regard things like …
/r/MensRights22/11/22 01:13 AM
1

Some women do in fact ignore male victimization, however, they rarely do so completely and if they do it's out of ignorance or stupidity. This fact is true of men as well. Many men don't know how child support works, for example. A huge thing that victimizes men, their children and even their ex wives. They understand little about the collision between their state level government and family courts to swindle families out of assets. The system is set up so the families only loose out financially…
/r/MensRights22/11/22 12:02 AM
6

Depends on country... India, Pakistan.... Yeah... Men are safer out at night in general. Being out at night as a women is seen as soliciting by some there. This plus homosexual rape is less frequent and less reported there. Even heterosexual rape isn't really reported as much. You look like a soft mark... Someone will take it. Women tend to be physically weaker then men, making them a mark for some. However, that doesn't mean all men act like fucking predators.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 06:16 PM
9

You assume rational actors. Most people are at very least not entirely rational. Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity. The stupidity here is the bullshit expectation that some women have that marriage is supposed to complete them as human beings or worse yet, motherhood is supposed to. They get married for the wrong reason, then divorce when they are not getting what they expected. They often refuse to give up on the idea that someone can complete them. Lathe…
/r/MensRights20/11/22 03:05 PM
1

Externalities are any side effect or consequence of an commercial activity that affects other parties without this being reflected in the cost of the goods or services involved. Large scale, it's easy to point to....air pollution for example. Particularly in certain regions. The production of the pill for women, which puts hormones into drinking water... Or plastics manufacturers pumping out new plastics rather then recycling existing stuff because it's cheaper. This allowing plastics to work th…
/r/MensRights17/11/22 04:40 PM
0

No, I simply believe that the vast majority of people that make that claim and honestly believe it overlook some externalities that they created to get up off the ground. Most people compromise ethics, the law or their personal code to get ahead. They make justifications for it later ....be that they have greater obligations, such children or a sick parent that mitigate their actions. I think I'd folly to think paradigms of some set of virtue exist. That's why the expression "don't meet your her…
/r/MensRights16/11/22 09:27 PM
2

I honestly remember when the Columbine shooting happened and the only person that made a reasonable response regarding the event was the musician Marilyn Manson. He was asked what he would have told those kids if he could have. He said "nothing, I would have listened for a change"... He was turn promptly blamed for the entire thing lol. Moral of the story, don't point out how fucked others are...I guess. He is now being accused of rape sex trafficking ..etc etc. Mostly me too bs
/r/MensRights16/11/22 01:00 PM
2

Honestly, I don't believe that's true. It isn't cream that floats to the top my friend. It generally takes less then ethical and perhaps legal means to get starting capital to really start a life. Paycheck to paycheck isn't a life and hoping your annual raise will get you there or that years in an industry will lead you to something of value... That is a risky bet. Everyone successful had a hustle. Generally one that took advantage of someone. Sad fact... Externalities exist
/r/MensRights16/11/22 12:32 PM
2

Frankly, i was raised by that same mother with no child support and being first generation. I present white... But thats not what kept me from running around being a danger to myself and others. That was the fact that whenever I needed to talk, someone listened. People do choose to act out, generally early in life and due to a need to be heard... That snowballs as you get older. Being poor and living in an area where crime is accepted doesn't help but there are always places in a community for a…
/r/MensRights16/11/22 12:24 PM
2

Mmmmhhh... Depends. "The patriarchy" is still nebulous... Some with see it as one thing. Others as another. Even the card carrying members of the core movement pin it down only so much. It's not a concept, is a tactic... That's what most don't understand and why it is effective.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 12:05 PM
2

Being convicted of a violent crimes greatly effect right to custody in the US. However, rape is an issue here...A 18 year old that sleeps with a 16 year old is considered rape in the US. Should a child result, blocking the make male 18 yr old from making a claim to custody is frankly horse shit. Yet rape is a violent crime
/r/MensRights16/11/22 11:07 AM
6

The "you don't belong but you're useful to the cause anyways" atmosphere of the word Ally is something iv noticed. Thanks for calling it out.
/r/MensRights14/11/22 05:50 AM
2

Society doesn't make these decisions in the West. The west looks to the enlightenment for its core principles. The enlightenment is liberal with regard to how many children you should have. We don't set limits or quota. We leave that up to the individual. This is especially true in the States. We traditionally accept childlessness better then most western nations, particularly that of men. (Don't get me wrong, there is still a bunch of social horse shit entitlement regarding kids, little shit li…
/r/MensRights12/11/22 12:35 PM
1

Would love to know if the victim had previous contact with any of the rapists or their families. Can be gang on gang gangbang. If it's humiliation, random victim still isn't likely...
/r/MensRights11/11/22 12:24 PM
2

Idk if feminism is responsible or if birth rates are largely a function of modern medical convenience. We made it possible to have sex without the responsibility of having children. (Which may very well be why you see cultural differences in rape among men, the availability of sex without the need for fatherhood) This sexual liberty is a benefit to both sexes in a culture. However, If you presuppose that birth rates must remain at a relatively high level to maintain social well being, you just c…
/r/MensRights11/11/22 12:15 PM
1

Yeah....no. Go to the administration and insist to see someone. You were threatened and intimidated. You will get the ACLU involved if needed. Remember, don't let the little things slide... They set precedent for larger things.
/r/MensRights06/11/22 10:32 PM
4

Your fucked in the head. Also your a shit..do better
/r/MensRights04/11/22 10:51 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter