TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

pleasingpineapple Archive

View 0 posts and 31 comments by pleasingpineapple on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

Ooooh. A Sarkeesian! EDIT: You never actually addressed my argument, by the way. Just kinda made the absurd claim that there's not really any sexism in video games and left. Well allow me to retort: First of all, negative portrayals of females in video games are implicit. Citation needed. A kid playing a game doesn't observe the sexism. Hmm. Well that just depends on how explicit it is, doesn't it? Made more confusing by how oversensitive we are portraying women negatively at this point, and how…
/r/MensRights29/11/13 10:37 AM
68

I don't think this was written by a student. I think it was written by OP. I think it is OP's way to field their thoughts to the sub without attaching themselves to it directly, as if the points raised are novel and refreshing. Except there really isn't anything refreshing here, and without citations comes off as an opinion, a rant, and would not garner high marks. The whole thing seems fishy. Like those fake Facebook comment battle screenshots people post. /thathappened If legit, mark it approp…
/r/MensRights29/11/13 09:39 AM
1

I wasn't suggesting that they do so, I was asking whether it would be possible for them to face it. It's already possible for men to become parents against their will, through deception, or without their knowledge and be forced to support the child financially. It isn't such a stretch to believe that someone could attempt to extend that crap to include a sperm donor who's sperm knocked up an underage girl, whether he intentionally had anything to do with it or not. What you would consider to be …
/r/MensRights29/04/13 05:43 PM
1

I'm curious. The article says that she's believed to have miscarried at 14, but then had a baby at 16. Were both the miscarriage and baby a result of the donor insemination? What, if any, legal options do(es) the donor(s) have? If you're a donor, and agree to donate on the condition that your sperm could be used willingly by an adult woman, but is instead coerced onto an underage girl, what are the possible implications? Did the donor unknowingly sexually assault the girl? Did the mother sexuall…
/r/MensRights29/04/13 12:44 AM
5

Actually, a form of men's rights existed prior to feminism, and right around the time that the women's suffrage movement was coming about, they were called masculinists, and later sort of merged into traditionalists. It was equal parts "for men's rights" and "for keeping women in the kitchen". There was a post a few days ago over the term masculinism, and I mentioned that I would not be interested adopting that term for MRAs. Much of that reason being that the masculinists from back then would m…
/r/MensRights11/04/13 05:04 AM
1

Cuckolding and BBC community? It's disturbing to think about, simply because the allure is typically that the men are viewed less as being human and more as being animalistic sex objects. I know it's all good if everyone's enjoying themselves, but damn if it isn't a fantasy throwback to a time when black men were being lynched for white women's sexual exploits. Pretty twisted form of positive racism.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 04:07 AM
4

As a Polynesian man, most positive racism I've encountered has been by white women. The most overt has been from black women. It's almost as if race is more influential than gender.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 04:03 AM
1

If the social behavior is an effect of biological differences, then it's a biological difference that expresses itself in the social sphere. Put another way, all social differences are rooted in biological differences. They are the only innate differences between men and women. I'd suggest asking yourself why men and women are different socially, why men and women exhibit different social behavior, and how on earth social differences spring forth if not from a biological root cause.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 02:41 AM
1

I've seen that checklist before and agree the items on it are pretty shifty. One of the questions is whether the victim reports vigorously resisting the assault, and if they answer yes to that question they're given 3 points. It would be nearly impossible to imagine a rape that would not score at least 16 points with that checklist, and it does MRAs a disservice to point to it for any reason.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 02:27 AM
2

This is a culmination of a couple of things. One, it's apparent after reading Volundarkvioa's comments here in the thread that they believe the only difference that exists between men and women in their natural form is biological in origin. All the other crap, the societal expectations, the gender roles and discrimination that derive from that, are all tacked on after the fact. Volundarkvioa is trying to say that the biological differences are all that matters, the legal differences that fall un…
/r/MensRights09/04/13 09:09 AM
2

First of all, the lack of understanding the difference between inclusivity and exclusivity is a logic debate that's been done and over with for a few thousands years. Let's draw a venn diagram to illustrate this. Draw two circles that do not touch. Label one Biological and the other Social. Inside the social circle, draw another circle so that it is fully encompassed by the Social circle. Label that circle Legal. Legal discrimination is social discrimination, but all social discrimination is not…
/r/MensRights09/04/13 08:40 AM
1

... and which debate would that be, where the laws of men don't fall under the umbrella of society?
/r/MensRights09/04/13 08:27 AM
4

Well, legal disparity would fall under social differences as laws are designed by us and not by biology. But you're statement that men and women are different both biologically and socially is true.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 08:19 AM
2

Dude, punitive damages are NOT for compensation for injury. They are otherwise referred to as exemplary damages, as in they are used to set an example and punish the other party for their wrongdoing. A chump change award amount would not "set an example" nor punish an entity like a church. It's high so it will hurt. That's the point. If you have a problem with that, bring it up with the California legal system. They're the ones that decided that 3-10x the compensatory amount is justifiable in th…
/r/MensRights09/04/13 07:37 AM
1

BS. The number of men coming out as having been abused in the Catholic church alone is staggering, and I hope every single one of them gets millions as well. You don't get to have church policies whose sole purpose is to hide reports of abuse and protect the church from culpability and expect to get away with it. I don't care what the sex of the victim is, this was a damn righteous verdict and hopefully sets a precedent. The only thing even remotely MRA related to this is that we can be fairly c…
/r/MensRights09/04/13 07:16 AM
3

It's been over a decade since I've done the college life bit, but are women still going out and getting drunk intentionally to encourage sex to happen? What I mean is, when I was younger many women would pre-game and overplay their drunkenness not accidentally, but intentionally to invite more sexual attention. Women consensually becoming receptive to sexual advances under the guise of non culpability due to inebriation if it becomes advantageous to distance themselves from their choices and act…
/r/MensRights09/04/13 06:39 AM
1

This line of reasoning breaks at point #1, simply because equal and quality are subjective. I'll entertain a response to #4 just to stir the pot a little, but as a disclaimer I'm responding to a failed argument. I would describe rape as biologically heinous for women because it (potentially) removes a woman's power to choose who's child her body is about to become burdened with in pregnancy. Remove the possibility of pregnancy and rape could crudely be analogous to a man having his genitals phys…
/r/MensRights09/04/13 06:19 AM
1

Any system that favors sending men to die overseas in wars is not a system designed to favor men as a whole. You can not be disposable and also advantaged. Women's mating choices force men to compete by actions in ways that women are typically never subject to compete in. Tack on social expectations to do more than just scrape by and high achieving men w/ status to match are an expected occurrence. High risk, high reward is the name of male existence. Which is why, as another poster eluded to, w…
/r/MensRights08/04/13 07:24 PM
3

I know enough early feminist literature to get around a debate, but not enough to confidently pin down the first utterance of the term. I would put my money on a feminist origin, however, and if I had to hazard a guess would look for a form of masculism being mentioned either in the '60s, or right around the turn of the 20th century. Particularly, French literature around the 1870-1890s. Sadly, I do not speak French, and so someone more knowledgeable than I will have to chime in. My gut is telli…
/r/MensRights08/04/13 01:58 AM
2

Are you interested in finding the term's first recorded usage? Or the evolution of the term inside and outside of feminist circles? You can go back much further than 1994 for this. 30 seconds on google pointed me to a usage in Elizabeth Davis The First Sex, and wouldn't you know it I actually have it on my shelf. Lo and behold, page 17 reads: Between these two millstones of "masculism" the Celts were finally crushed. Couple things to point out. The First Sex came out in 1971 during a flurry of f…
/r/MensRights08/04/13 01:21 AM
8

Positive male stereotypes are only negative when expressed in males. I believe they would like to keep traditional roles of male servitude to women and society in place, while adopting traditional male stereotypes when it benefits them. It's like they looked over the fence, ascertained the grass was greener on the male side, and set up camp there. They never cared to adopt the negatives associated with the male experience. Privilege being one of their tools, or the accusation of privilege being …
/r/MensRights05/04/13 06:59 AM
2

Feminism is an ideology much like religion. Only the most arrogant would debate a creationist using science and reasoning and truly expect it to change the mind of the theist. They operate under their form of faith, and are not bound by scientific reasoning. You debate them within earshot of those on the fence, and those who are just going along with it because it's what they've been told to do, in hopes that those people and the undecided and indifferent commit. The same can be said of die-hard…
/r/MensRights01/04/13 04:15 AM
2

There are hundreds of universities offering women's studies, or the more PC named gender studies, indoctrinating and pumping out fresh feminists year after year. 66 thousand subscribers, with far less than that being active, is hardly notable. It's a start, but it would be absurd to argue this sub has raised awareness in the face of the overwhelming mass of ill informed being churned out of our universities since the '70s or so.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 01:26 AM
3

So basically you're saying that if someone isn't required to fight in a war they shouldn't have the right to vote? No, you're saying that. I'm saying prior to women getting the vote, men were paying for that right by shouldering a responsibility that women were not required to do. The possibility that women would, you know, actually be required to pay for that right just as equally as men, was a valid concern for many women in those days. Luckily for them, women today enjoy the vote without sele…
/r/MensRights25/03/13 04:03 AM
5

Why is it offensive? You said something about male sacrifice... When have black men sacrificed for black women? Because you turned a gender issue into a racial one. If you'd like to go down that road, you can post a topic in SRSDiscussion or similar feminist space under your non-trolling name, and we can discuss it further. It's not my first go-round with a troll, and as a minority myself I can assure you the oppression olympics will not work on me. That doesn't make sense. Most people required …
/r/MensRights25/03/13 03:39 AM
3

Evilpundit said, and I quote: Women aren't our enemy. "The patriarchy" doesn't exist. "The patriarchy" is in quotes for a reason, as in "the patriarchy" is an entirely separate thing as explained in feminist literature, than what a patriarchy as defined by the dictionary actually is. You then responded in kind to "The patriarchy", so yes, you were speaking directly to "the patriarchy" as feminists define it, and not a patriarchy as I used it. Pretty basic stuff here.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 03:30 AM
6

No, I said a patriarchy, not to be confused with "patriarchy theory". They are not the same, and if you're confused as to the difference might I suggest taking the time to educate yourself on the matter.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 03:22 AM
6

I don't remember black men ever sacrificing anything for us in America... I'm having a hard time wrapping my head around just how offensive this is. You can conflate sexism and racism if you'd like, which is actually what feminism did when it rode on the coattails of the civil rights movement, but so we're clear they are very distinct, different things. Why shouldn't they (along with minorities and white men who didn't own land) be able to vote? Historically? Because they were never required to …
/r/MensRights25/03/13 03:21 AM
3

Feminism was a reaction to a world that, through (primarily) male sacrifice and ingenuity outside of the home, brought about the industrial revolution and technological advancements that allowed the divisions of roles based on sex to come down. Likewise, "patriarchy theory" or more correctly, a patriarchy, existed in a world much harsher, where simple divisions based on sex were advantageous to the guaranteed survival of the community. It is because "patriarchy" was so overwhelmingly successful …
/r/MensRights25/03/13 03:03 AM
56

Which is why I find the feminist push into atheist circles, and the unbridled welcoming many so-called free thinking atheists extend to them, to be quite disturbing.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 04:32 AM
4

could cause them to hate themselves or their gender I believe that's the point of the campaign. More so than actually targeting rapists in a matter likely to reduce male on female rape, it seems more effective in shaming men as a whole. I do not think it an accident, either.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 03:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter