TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

plenkton Archive

View 10 posts and 277 comments by plenkton on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
29

Metaplenkton/r/TheRedPill25/09/15 12:54 PM
16

Metaplenkton/r/TheRedPill25/09/15 10:29 AM
13

Metaplenkton/r/TheRedPill10/11/15 09:32 PM
13

Metaplenkton/r/TheRedPill30/09/16 05:44 PM
8

Field Reportplenkton/r/TheRedPill25/12/15 12:57 PM
0

Scienceplenkton/r/TheRedPill17/05/16 11:04 PM
0

plenkton/r/askTRP21/01/15 06:47 AM
0

Metaplenkton/r/TheRedPill30/11/15 01:42 PM
0

Metaplenkton/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 06:26 AM
0

Red Pill Exampleplenkton/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 09:44 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

1% If the cost (including OP's time) is less than 20k, then go for it. And if it's more than 20k to recover, and OP values making it right, then go for it.
/r/askTRP02/12/18 12:06 PM
0

Racial discrimination in the workplace is illegal and immoral. It's not immoral for an employer to discriminate based on expected merit according to immutable/mutable characteristics. It is immoral for government to discriminate outside of merit, and government usually fund against merit- funding those who the market chooses against.
/r/askTRP31/10/18 06:24 AM
9

TD is an echo chamber on purpose The notion that all forums are meant for discussion is wrong. The reason that there is no popular Trump discussion reddit is because popular political thought is devoid of principle and theory- and thus no discussion asides from "I want this, I don't want that." is possible.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/17 08:58 AM
7

tldr: The mind cannot be forced; but the mind, given the knowledge that profitable action (cost<benefit) is possible, can act. And that giving one the knowledge of the possibility of action (through empathizing) will empower both people- increasing the social power of the teacher and the productive power of the student.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/17 11:35 AM
0

If you don't "let her," she'll do so without your permission- which is a sure way to lose her respect.
/r/askTRP09/02/17 09:02 PM
4

False- such class instills fear in the offenders, and elicits resentment and provides group support for the offended. But you're right in that traditionally university classes used to teach facts so that one could understand/work-with reality.
/r/askTRP25/01/17 06:52 PM
2

the average guy is pathetic You can say that the average person is weak, but not necessarily pathetic. Pathetic implies that you know such person's valuations in his life.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/16 05:33 PM
2

It may be, for athletes, if we are speaking of compression clothing. I am not sure about the socks. Compression clothing is likely fine- that which should be avoided is clothing that constricts arteries- wearing a tight sweater could interfere with the brachial artery (under armpit).
/r/TheRedPill30/12/16 05:31 PM
4

Make TRP Great Again! Build the wall (aka give bans)!
/r/TheRedPill29/12/16 10:17 PM
5

So out of interest, what should older people do to avoid it? My uncle is cracking 75 this year and still insists on shoveling his own snow. He's in decent shape (active hiker), but I still worry about him overestimating his capabilities. I will answer this, however I will note that your uncle may know the risks (but chooses to do such- I find older folk value independence above health, to a certain degree). That said, the problem is increase the body's workload (shoveling, warming body, coughing…
/r/TheRedPill29/12/16 09:59 PM
26

Correction to "heart attack snow," as to the reason. The reason is not low fitness nearly as much as an older person, with constricting clothing, in the cold (constricting blood vessels), exerting himself while probably coughing due to temperature difference. All these factors increase a person's blood pressure which contributes to heart attacks.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/16 05:43 PM
27

First, gang does not necessarily mean illegal. And legal does not mean moral.
/r/TheRedPill17/12/16 10:17 AM
1

TRP thread on comedy
/r/askTRP15/12/16 02:47 PM
-1

You act as you wish, and encourage her to adapt (through her actions). If she does not, you next her.
/r/askTRP14/12/16 05:30 PM
2

Men don't complain- they act. If your gf is not adapting/as-you-wish, then next. If it's your life that is not as you wish, then you adapt. When is the last time you heard that a girl solved someone's problem?
/r/askTRP14/12/16 05:29 PM
3

"In 2008, Namibia had an HIV prevalence rate of 17.8% in adults ages 15 to 49"
/r/askTRP13/12/16 11:18 AM
5

You could sell her nudes for 22USD.
/r/askTRP13/12/16 11:16 AM
4

Every concentual act of sex is paid- and prostitutes are cheaper than a wife (even if not divorced) per sex act.
/r/askTRP13/12/16 11:15 AM
1

I know the 'smart' appeal- but from experience it's usually exceeded by the crazy factor, especially among women of higher intellect.
/r/askTRP18/11/16 07:23 AM
1

Women exist outside of work- so either you work too much (not enough time to pursue outside of work) or you are being lazy.
/r/askTRP18/11/16 12:13 AM
4

Harris explains scientific knowledge in debates where scientific knowledge is accepted. His frame is as strong as his ability to explain scientific knowledge.
/r/askTRP15/10/16 03:51 AM
1

By not telling him, OP 100% keeps friend. By telling him, OP may not keep friend. I don't see much reward for OP in telling his friend.
/r/askTRP11/10/16 07:43 PM
1

Don't tell him- lest you risk your friend turning against you. He will find out if he wants to- and if he doesn't, he won't. Women are bad at hiding.
/r/askTRP11/10/16 06:57 AM
1

To further your point, is there any freedom without the ability to direct one's labor?
/r/TheRedPill01/10/16 11:12 AM
0

I don't know what the answer is, since I also don't want innocent kids starving, but I definitely favor somehow doing away with such legal slavery of having to support the progeny of others. While I don't believe that any child in the US lacks for food (unless their parents choose to avoid food sheleters), you could always legalize work at any age- there are many objections to this- all easily refuted if one accepts that redistribution is wrong and that the best action of an individual is the on…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/16 10:42 PM
-1

When a woman decides she's going to just dump her husband for no reason, and live off of welfare and his child support, it's not just the husband that gets raped, ALL of us do. While I agree that it's rational for us to prevent women hurting all men through welfare, I remember that such issue only exists because we're all roped into redistributive system. Single moms are a plague upon society, and we need to start fighting back in our government policies, however we can! Using the government to …
/r/TheRedPill30/09/16 10:25 PM
1

Some guys still want to get married for some reason. It's not impossible for a man to rationally value marriage- just that we figure that most men are irrational in their decision to marry.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/16 08:09 PM
4

And her mental gymnastics will justify her action as good, regardless of any given definition of "good."
/r/TheRedPill30/09/16 07:47 PM
0

There is value- just that the cost (divorce rape) has increased while the benefit has not.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/16 05:51 PM
3

Agree- and as such, the mistake was not made by OP at the moment, but before- the second mistake was not showing deference to the master.
/r/askTRP28/09/16 12:11 PM
1

Failing to show loyalty is not reasonable though, since I hadn't been there for very long. If there a short period, then your trajectory was steep- thus the more likely showing loyalty was an issue.
/r/askTRP28/09/16 02:27 AM
0

So...where is your refutation?- you know that my answer is wrong without knowing the right answer?
/r/askTRP27/09/16 05:19 PM
0

Never outshine the master. You did not make the mistake in that moment- only in failing to show your loyalty to your boss while excelling at your job. Your boss felt threatened, and used his power to throw you off while he was still on top of you.
/r/askTRP27/09/16 05:02 PM
4

True, and the same people discriminate based on other criteria: height, age, sex, intellect- even though these characteristics are also innate/unchangeable- for some reason we feel like we owe it to others to treat them the same regardless of they can do for us- this is close to marxist, and denies what enables civilization: differences in people.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/16 08:12 PM
2

Yes, just a small detail- I only differ in that I see a different risk/reward value.
/r/askTRP01/09/16 05:38 AM
2

You're not understanding the power of tone and how it conveys the same message. Asking or not, either one can appear "passive aggressive" if delivered improperly. This is just a case of you deciding in your own head that because someone asked a mocking question that they're dead serious about it. You are asking someone, who is seeking advice on how to deal with a gf who wants a masculine hairstyle that he dislikes, to jokingly A&A- faking it until he makes it is likely- and the tone required may…
/r/askTRP01/09/16 05:14 AM
0

TRP is about emotionally affecting females, through leading, to get what males want- asking questions, when questions are not needed, signals that you are following- leaving your frame. You can A&A properly by saying "...and I will get fake tits," but it's unnecessary to ask her opinion.
/r/askTRP01/09/16 03:51 AM
0

ask her if she would stay with you post-op Even humorously one does not ask.
/r/askTRP01/09/16 03:05 AM
2

Be careful in assuming students are satarizing- good chance they're being serious. And if you decide to challenge other's positions, remember that beliefs can be people's identity, even their religion.
/r/askTRP01/09/16 02:45 AM
5

Sounds like passive aggression. And asking a women for empathy (for a man) is asking an impossibility.
/r/askTRP01/09/16 02:31 AM
1

What I'm saying is that your bench better for 405+ to seem impressive- which is quite far from 315.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/16 08:52 PM
1

High school football players often lift ~290.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/16 08:35 PM
13

If he was muscular and strong , she would have thought twice about attacking him If he was muscular and strong, she would have been dtf.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/16 08:20 PM
2

TRP is about owning yourself and your life.
/r/askTRP18/08/16 01:07 PM
3

Gay for protection, they call it.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/16 07:59 AM
3

"When a nigger dies, it's because a hoe was horny the night before." Tupac (interview)
/r/TheRedPill11/08/16 07:58 AM
1

So many misconceptions, thus we should remember: Stock price is not directly related to a company's capital, moreso its profitability- when a company is bankrupted, its capital does not disappear- it's reallocated. Marissa Mayer's severance, like all other severance for CEO, is paid for their experience and their government connections- don't be bad for high pay unless it's earned for government connections. Just like the company could have done better, it's also possible that it may have been w…
/r/TheRedPill26/07/16 05:21 AM
1

The best car one can afford will always pale in comparison to a better model. And with women, some men think that they can only afford a certain women- perhaps this is true. Sometimes the superior model is out of reach.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/16 02:04 PM
1

Females act according to their environment- which you can control. You provided her one type of environment (allowed self to be led on), and she took advantage. The good feeling that comes from revenge are the product of the evolutionary past- where males subjugated one another with physical force- and unless you do this, the feeling of revenge will subside, as you see your opponent (her current bf) maintain status.
/r/askTRP14/07/16 12:29 AM
3

...assuming her purchases retain more than 10% value.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/16 04:23 AM
2

TRP is apathetic to abortion, as it does not relate to sexual access. However, abortion has a few defenses: 1. Religious: You are killing God's son/daughter, so its disallowed- same reason they oppose suicide- because God owns you. 2. In-species preference: Killing one's own species, without acquiring benefit (male lions competing against one another, or female spider eating male spider) is destructive to the species, and thus avoided instinctually. 3. Rational arguments, regarding rights: The f…
/r/askTRP28/06/16 10:15 PM
-2

She's actually 68kg- 1 year ago. More like 82 now.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/16 09:00 AM
3

Where are you working- hospital, oil rig?
/r/askTRP16/06/16 11:20 PM
2

When you are tired, sunflower seeds. You can spit them into a cup. This is really useful when you are driving and tired. They stimulate the senses, and require constant mindfullness. Hallucinations are normal when people are tired. Stay awake for 2-3 days, and you will hallucinate.
/r/askTRP16/06/16 11:18 PM
1

today?
/r/askTRP02/06/16 02:27 PM
14

Marriage is only dying because women get the benefit without paying the cost. Hold them liable to the cost and they will be better wives.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/16 08:30 PM
3

Ontario is that you? In Sk, things are a lot less crazy- less immigrants, less feminism...as the saying goes: "are you a conservative or a communist?"
/r/TheRedPill01/06/16 08:28 PM
1

Do unto others as they do unto you- but do it first.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/16 10:39 AM
1

"Funny" is "funny to humans," and thus theater tickets matter- unless you figure that comedic ability is unrelated to audience size. Comedy written by teams of writers (such as most female comedians, and all TV comedians) is not necessarily representitive of a person's comedic skills.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/16 02:07 AM
1

People of inferior height still have a certain height in the same way that inferior comedy is still some comedy. "Less" is comparative, while "none" is absolute. The sad part is you accusing me of stupidity when you cannot even comprehend words, let alone arguments.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/16 01:07 AM
1

A rebuttal would mean I would need to disprove what you said in your response. Ad hom. You say that I'm retarded, but are seemingly unable to show why. Perhaps it's not me who is retarded. You clearly stated that women aren't funny. False. I clearly said that women are less funny than men. I simply said that women are funny. False. You said that women can be "very funny." Very is not a comparative word, and my post is of comparative humor (I say "superior humor.") You proved the validity of my p…
/r/TheRedPill18/05/16 10:51 PM
1

While it is insight into another person, it's insight into their actions, not their thoughts/feelings. When one sees a Youtube video of dumb things (inanimate objects) such as an electrical outlet underneath a water tap, its humorous without involving people.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/16 03:50 PM
1

That is not the definition, Altruism or selflessness is the principle or practice of concern for the welfare of others. but I agree with you.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/16 03:46 PM
1

Then why do we laugh at it? Why does it make us feel good?
/r/TheRedPill18/05/16 03:40 PM
1

If you are altruistic when you don't have to be, you're beta.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/16 03:38 PM
1

Simply give me an example of a case in which a person laughs without feeling sudden insight into the thoughts or feelings of another person. That's all you have to do to disprove my theory. It's humorous when a person realizes that it's not only they who do a certain dumb thing.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/16 03:36 PM
1

Altruism is required, to a certain degree, like in modern society. Otherwise the weak will oppose you- their game plan is extortion. And this extortion is present in other animals.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/16 03:23 PM
1

Simply give me an example of a case in which a person laughs without feeling sudden insight into the thoughts or feelings of another person. That's all you have to do to disprove my theory. In video games, I remember bosses laughing after they shut the gate, making the players' work harder. This is how theories work. Theories usually have an explanation for why the theory is true.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/16 03:21 PM
1

Emotions are electrical/chemical effects of stimulii. Context of event (child faceplant) is a secondary cognitive process.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/16 03:14 PM
1

That altruism is increasingly selected (evolutionarily) over self-interest. And while altruism increases average wellbeing, he does not consider that altruism may not always be beneficial.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/16 03:09 PM
-1

You feel the need to rebut me, but resort to insults.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/16 02:56 PM
1

You assume that one cannot experience shadenfreude and empathy simultaneously. The laughter is shadenfreude.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/16 02:54 PM
1

You are asking me to deny your observations. While you do state that you have examined their motivation ("examining their motivation"), you did not provide it. What reasoning does your theory have?
/r/TheRedPill18/05/16 02:51 PM
1

My post is my theory- and it's substantiated. You also have your theory, but it's not substantiated, and thus cannot be attacked.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/16 02:13 PM
1

I thought/researched my theory, and showed my reasoning. While you may have done the thought/research, you don't show any reasoning. You describe a theory without its basis. You are offering mysticism.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/16 01:53 PM
-1

Your "general theory of humor" is utter BS. Humor is not schadenfreude. Therefore the rest of your post is crap as well. Ad hom. Humor is human intimacy. The sudden insight into the thoughts and feelings of another human are pleasurable, and we respond by laughing (and sometimes crying). Unsubstantiated. Sardonic laughter is not the result of humor. It is the result of hate. Unsubstantiated. Most of the time when we laugh at people's misfortune it's because we empathize with them about the absur…
/r/TheRedPill18/05/16 01:42 PM
1

It's more important for men to show social proof, such as wit, than it's ever been for women. Why, though? I believe that it shows a man's power/ability.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/16 01:33 PM
0

Amused Mastery means you comprehend the big, big, big picture and it's pleasurable... it's "the light". What do you believe is the root cause of the attraction to amused mastery?- What qualities, in a person, does is accompany?
/r/TheRedPill18/05/16 05:04 AM
1

No, /u/Thisisaveryseriousid is saying that the media is misrepresenting Trump, and that the media can decide a beta's opinion.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/16 01:59 AM
3

Most betas believe that Trump (alpha) is not alpha, because they let themselves be told the facts, instead of discovering the facts for themselves.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/16 01:57 AM
-3

Women can be very funny "Very funny", or "as funny as men?" The former, sure- the latter, never. Although the writing(written by both men and women) has a huge hand in the comedy in The Office, the timing, expression and delivery of the women in that show is fantastic. Between Jim, Dwight, Michael, Andy, in what order do you find them funny? My answer, encoded, by their initials, is: Z F H N. (If there are replies, I will release the key.)
/r/TheRedPill18/05/16 01:22 AM
0

While the definition of shadenfreude is "pleasure derived by someone from another person's misfortune," I believe it can be extended to mean "pleasure derived by someone from changes in their relative inferiority/superiority." And because shadenfreude exists in the playing of a zero-sum (resources/mates) game, as opposed to a "resource creator" game, changes in relative superiority/inferiority will result in "another person's misfortune." Amused Mastery is to the self when you get the "ah ha" mo…
/r/TheRedPill18/05/16 01:13 AM
1

I'm the one deciding how things go in every decision. I'm pretty sure they like this (feel safe for them), and will also yield you the best results. I think where I messed up was thinking just because women love to give up agency and just follow doesn't necessarily mean they don't have it. They just hate using it. By agency, do you mean "the ability to decide"? Because, from my reading of your post, you mean agency as "the ability to decide based on all consequences."
/r/TheRedPill22/04/16 05:03 PM
1

This is where mankind has progressed- we are no longer trapped to emotional decision-making. Did you literally just imply evolution does not exist? Holy. Shit. Humans literally make all their decisions based on emotions. Even logic decisions are based on what feels right in that mindspace in that moment in time. I am not implying that evolution does not exist, I am stating that humans make decisions in two ways: instinctually and logically. Decisions are usually a combination of both, but saying…
/r/TheRedPill22/04/16 04:58 PM
1

He controls himself under the belief that it is proper to do so This belief is founded when a man deals with civilized people (equal rights, usually of personal autonomy). And this is why females don't qualify as civilized. They use their instincts to see if the other person is worthy. This is where mankind has progressed- we are no longer trapped to emotional decision-making. We can deal without emotional bonds- we can value each other based on the amount of money we grant each other. Money may…
/r/TheRedPill22/04/16 04:33 PM
6

Those who join a group because of its popularity, are followers, and followers usually need someone stronger (mentally) to create the path. I will note that a non-nuanced reading of your post does place blame on males for any action of a female. However (and correct me if I'm wrong), your post states that when men give power to a women, men are responsible for the consequences. Ex: man give woman money for gas, woman spends it on fast food-> man is responsible for allowing the woman to misalloca…
/r/TheRedPill22/04/16 04:24 PM
2

/u/IAMAwhitecismaleAMA did not assign blame to a man for a woman lacking agency. /u/IAMAwhitecismaleAMA did assign blame to a man for allowing a woman's lack of agency to affect a man. Your fault for letting it get that far. As a man, it's your job to define the relationship. This says that it's a man's fault for allowing a women to affect a man's property/self. Sure she took it too far but women, in general, have no agency. Thus they aren't responsible for their actions. Again, /u/IAMAwhitecism…
/r/TheRedPill22/04/16 04:10 PM
2

It can argued that the equivalent of a slut (a woman without self-control) is a nice guy beta (a man without self-control). The logic here seems to be that a slut is one who cannot control their actions and is unaware of his value (lack of self esteem).
/r/TheRedPill22/04/16 03:57 PM
4

There is no shaming, /u/IAMAwhitecismaleAMA only stated that a man is responsible for the consequences of his actions- in this case, allowing a female too much power in the relationship.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/16 03:55 PM
12

"You gotta let them know what kind of guy you are, then they'll know what kind of girl to be” -Ken (Mad Men)
/r/TheRedPill22/04/16 03:53 PM
3

Both sexes can define the relationship by their willingness to walk away. Men hold commitment, women hold sex. Neither sex can define a relationship (this would be slavery).
/r/TheRedPill22/04/16 03:52 PM
0

Threesome.
/r/askTRP21/04/16 01:01 AM
1

That is what the money is for!
/r/TheRedPill11/04/16 09:17 AM
-2

/u/RedApathy does not necessarily want you to break up with her, but be willing to. It's likely that she will want to keep you, and is just trying to extract money from you. Women are like children- they push and whine, but only do so to test your strength.
/r/askTRP08/04/16 02:06 AM
1

"Love" is different for men than it is for women. Men love women for their ability to conceive/raise the man's offspring. Women love men for their ability to proffer resources. Thus while love has men take care of women (so that she can raise his child), women's love is completely selfish- she will only love a man so long as he provides her resources. Regarding this post, when a woman is not fucking a certain man, she knows that he has no reason to love her- as she will not have his child.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/16 09:49 AM
-2

ur not helping the vicious natural cycle. It can't be helped.
/r/askTRP05/04/16 01:47 PM
10

"Honey, Julia has been harassing me to break it off with you, but you mean too much to me. Please tell Julia to leave me alone."
/r/askTRP05/04/16 07:40 AM
-2

While a couple can have an agreement to be faithful, it's silly to honor such commitment when you know your partner is likely to cheat.
/r/askTRP05/04/16 07:37 AM
1

Women have a lot of trouble with physical objects. Asked women to estimate a volume, believed her, later found out that "over half" = "less than a quarter." Then, I asked her to estimate a length, which I know is 11inches. She said 2. I showed her how long an inch is. She said 3. Just tell chicks you are [height] x 1.25.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/16 12:22 AM
5

When Vasagel is legal, we will see: -larger government welfare for women with children -outlaw of paternity tests -a boyfriend/husband is legally the father, regardless of paternity test, and regardless of signing the birth certificate
/r/TheRedPill31/03/16 03:13 AM
2

Bonobos- a type of ape. They are near extinction, in that they only occupy a small area, and do so because it's devoid of predators.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/16 11:45 PM
3

The part that frustrates men is that women will squander 10% of their combined net worth in order to take an extra 10k. Not even counting the costs and stress of litigation.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/16 11:40 PM
1

They aren't paid the same under the Labor Theory of Value. Labor Theory of Value: The labor theory of value is the economic theory that stipulates that the value of a good or service is dependent upon the labor used in its production. The labor theory of value suggests that goods which take the same amount of time to produce should cost the same. The brain surgeon required several years of med schools and training to do the surgery he's doing, so the Labor theory of value says that the brain sur…
/r/TheRedPill22/03/16 04:16 AM
5

Welcome to the Labor Theory of Value- where a brain surgeon and a fast food worker are paid the same.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/16 03:57 PM
12

Assuming you don't use 'invisible' literally, shorter men are much less desirable to women. And while not totally invisible, they are much less desirable.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/16 05:30 PM
14

80/20 rule. 80% of men are under 6feet (closer to 87%, actually).
/r/TheRedPill20/03/16 05:14 PM
27

tl;dr: To improve the world, demand to live only for oneself- and never demand that others live for you. Human behavior only changes according to consequences. And while people are able to predict (with varying precision) the consequences of actions, our (male and female) actions are guided by feelings, not logic. So if we want to 'do something about that,' we need to either change people's feelings (not possible), or change how people make decisions (feelings vs logic). So, having people use lo…
/r/TheRedPill20/03/16 04:42 PM
1

Females do better when their deception is unknown- therefore, they like to avoid those who know female deception- and that is why they want to avoid RP males.
/r/askTRP18/03/16 06:43 PM
1

They lie, but convince themselves lies are small/justified.
/r/askTRP17/03/16 02:25 PM
14

just signed a leash together She has you committed to live with her. Now imagine you being committed to her in marriage.
/r/askTRP10/03/16 05:18 AM
8

From an economics perspective, here's clarification: All of the folks stuck with student loans are spending what WOULD be disposable income to service bullshit student loan debt. People are misallocating funds, where proper allocation is allocation that fulfills human desires. That is why green energy is bad- we might say we want it, but few people would actually pay more for negligible benefit. It's what's killing the housing market... the money baby boomers would have put into houses coming ou…
/r/TheRedPill08/03/16 01:19 PM
9

Giving 4-8 years, with muslim invasion, I don't think they'll need any outside push to elect a right-wing government. People will yearn for safety, and a Trump-esque leader will be craved.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/16 12:03 PM
7

Arguments are very healthy to women. No, women knowing their limits is healthy. Women need to know what they are allowed to do, and what they are not allowed to do. In a male/female relationship, arguments mean that the male has not asserted his boundaries upon the female, and the argument is used (by the female) to test the male's fortitude.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/16 12:00 PM
2

Girls make terrible friends.
/r/askTRP07/03/16 08:35 AM
1

Taxes- which men pay more than women, while consuming less. DONE. Enjoy the decline.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/16 02:16 PM
5

"The Fountainhead" and "Atlas Shrugged" both describe her ideal man- and both stories multiple antagonists- each one differs from the non-ideal, sometimes in only one attribute. Her protagonists are uncompromising- they allow themselves to become poor and homeless instead of compromising their values- that man should live for his own sake, and be free from those who seek to control him. Her writings are red-pill in that her morality is individualism- whereas blue-pill is collectivism (serving ot…
/r/askTRP04/03/16 10:59 AM
1

Ofc to all the above. Males also strive in competitive environment, while I don't believe women do well. Women seemingly do work that requires repetition, not invention. Women need the feeling of security (in their environment), while males do not.
/r/TheRedPill29/02/16 05:55 AM
22

We don't need X women, or X men in STEM. We need people to do STEM work.
/r/TheRedPill29/02/16 02:23 AM
9

Trump is doing what he wants, and using others to achieve his plan. He is a leader, a tactician, and the best candidate- and unlike the pure Libertarian sorts, he is prepared to make progress within the current system. And while it's temping to judge a leader based on what they say, TRP teaches that language is a tool to get what you want- not necessarily reflecting what you want. His presidency does not necessarily reflect his rhetoric.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/16 09:44 AM
-1

Women are the tool to fulfill a man's desires. It's silly to expect a tool to handle itself.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/16 10:25 AM
11

Less: for non-quantifiable Fewer: for quantifiable
/r/TheRedPill21/02/16 06:54 AM
1

Even feminists and conservative women will look the other way if you add value to peoples' lives. Exactly...whatever people's actions/words, the root is always the same- power (to survive/reproduce).
/r/askTRP18/02/16 01:17 PM
1

Men want their females monogomous so that his earnings are used to support his offspring. Women (used to) want it because men supported/protected them. The reason women no longer want it is because their demand (more men per women) has increased, and the penalties against being with multiple men (pregnancy, ostracism, legal-issues) have decreased.
/r/askTRP18/02/16 01:14 PM
1

Everyone gets what they can, for the least cost. Rousey gets most from her work. And when she wants emotional support, she gets it from the media. Men do the same, but we have less to offer the opposite sex, and the difference between what we can extort form other men, form what we can earn ourselves, is much smaller than the same said for women. That is human action in a nutshell.
/r/askTRP18/02/16 07:50 AM
0

Threesome.
/r/askTRP15/02/16 08:20 AM
2

That which I think is important, is not talking to the police, even if you are the victim. Let the courts do their work. Unless the purpetrator is getting away, keep your mouth shut.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/16 09:12 PM
2

I like the message of "not admitting guilt when you have not done wrong." People are always looking for leadership. When they find someone who does not apologize for non-offensive actions, they will follow that person...but if such a person admits guilty (whether or not he's guilty), they will crucify him.
/r/askTRP10/02/16 10:23 PM
1

I just read your original post, where you take a drive with her, then she throws dog and claims rape. That is cold- the planning for that. It's as though she wanted a stronger case against you, and for you to suffer for dumping her. Without knowing how women operate, I understand how you figured she wanted to help you. And it's too bad you had to learn this the hard way. Most men learn this in less serious ways. That being said, I have heard that people fed up with North American legal issues li…
/r/askTRP10/02/16 03:39 AM
2

Is it because you can't prove your lawyer was incompetent?
/r/askTRP10/02/16 03:02 AM
3

Women seem to be better than men at healing from certain types of wounds. Women never recover from this, ti will always haunt her. Men recover to the extent that they understand their emotions. Women, they lack this ability.
/r/askTRP04/02/16 12:05 AM
4

Male and female, we both desire safety. While males may trade safety for reproductive success, females have no such desire. It's why male animals will fight violently, but females will only shove and ostracise. Your gf had the mentality of being protected (having you are her bf), so she acted as such...even though you were not there (males usually protect their mates, especially from sexual behavior with others, including rape). So now your gf distrusts you (even though you never let her down). …
/r/askTRP04/02/16 12:02 AM
1

Girl's self-value was hurt because you did not push past her ASD. Now she is questioning herself. The only thing girls understand, is what man tells them to understand.
/r/askTRP02/02/16 08:43 AM
7

I will pay $200 to tape it. Capitalism.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/16 04:52 AM
1

People delay work because pay (after taxes) is not enough. And instead of wealth creation, people are pre-occupied stealing....and protecting their own....instead.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/16 04:52 AM
1

Civilization is built upon delaying consumption (instead investment in production), which is impossible when people are in crisis. Who is to say that 10Million wont die to starvation/civil unrest this year?
/r/TheRedPill02/02/16 04:50 AM
1

You state women trying to get pregnant, even from non gringos... how do women fair: 1. single, no children 2. single, children 3. married, no children 4. married, children Also, is it hard to get to better country, or would moving to Europe (for welfare) make you even more worse off?
/r/TheRedPill02/02/16 04:42 AM
5

You went from 180 to 30 in 3 years....that hurts, especially when the first 15-25 a person makes is spent on basic needs (house food). So really, from 150k to 10k disposable. The sad thing is people opting for short term gain over long term gain. Too many don't see the value in productive capital.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/16 04:35 AM
2

It seems the more technical a person's profession, the more difficult it is to understand women. Women act very different compared to men, which seems odd (by the understanding that both sexes want happy lives). I used to operate with women on the premise that a relationship provided a base, and a spring board for people to thrive. A base because of the security. And a springboard because each would bolster each other to succeed. But I've learned that it's men's job to lead, and THAT (leading) i…
/r/TheRedPill31/01/16 06:45 AM
6

It seems the more technical a person's profession, the more difficult it is to understand women. Women act very different compared to men, which seems odd (by the understanding that both sexes want happy lives). I used to operate with women on the premise that a relationship provided a base, and a spring board for people to thrive. A base because of the security. And a springboard because each would bolster each other to succeed. But I've learned that it's men's job to lead, and THAT (leading) i…
/r/TheRedPill31/01/16 06:45 AM
1

I don't dislike people who do what they can. I dislike people who make laws that make working for suckers. When you can work 160hours a month, but only earn $500 more, you are really working for $3/hour. Sad.
/r/TheRedPill28/01/16 12:55 AM
2

For the past 10 years, your brother provided guidance and a feeling of security. You have less of the security, and you are not sure whether his guidance was correct (as he is in jail, regardless of whether he deserves it). Figure out what people want, and do that. Or learn to do it. If you are in need of belonging, you will find it when you are useful to others.
/r/askTRP26/01/16 10:55 PM
0

but only a truly filthy human being would call healthcare slavery A moral (by principle of self ownership) person would classify the mandatory taxation to support healthcare as the most evil. TRP asserts rationality above emotion. When taxes are imposed to support healthcare of others, there is no rational basis. Only the emotional claim that "I want what others have." Feels > Reals is how women/animals/low-intellect people operate. It's when a person makes their decisions based on principles (w…
/r/TheRedPill12/01/16 09:26 PM
1

While the event may have occurred organically, an opposing leader could have spurred them to do so.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/16 09:19 PM
1

But perhaps you should be thanking her [a female's] nature. As a poster has said on TRP before, it's why we are able to have these discussions [females having cultivated our fitness (including mental)].
/r/TheRedPill03/01/16 10:39 AM
5

I agree. Is a guy really red pill if he has only 3 hb10s groveling for his dick? What a pleb.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/16 10:34 AM
1

They have no remorse, but they also are oblivious to reality. Even if they tried to reciprocate, they'd struggle simply in understanding reality. Let alone how to achieve any goal asides from their own self interest.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/16 10:30 AM
1

All I see is a women's seeing (but not realizing) af/bb.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/16 04:43 AM
1

"Exactly what YOU have in mind." or if you are really alpha with her (but the shit test is her ASD): "What you're dying to give me." (Prepare for drenched panties.)
/r/askTRP01/01/16 03:30 AM
0

LTR material: *is only girl on Earth
/r/askTRP29/12/15 11:14 PM
2

Every female seeks domination as long as she is being primal, and not rational. However if the female senses that you're weak, she will resist your domination. And if you lose, you might as well next her.
/r/askTRP29/12/15 10:56 AM
3

Businesses create value through voluntary trade. Lawyers divide value. Businessmen are much better for a country than any lawyer.
/r/TheRedPill26/12/15 10:45 PM
1

I don't mean that some characteristics are necessarily feminine, I do mean that characteristics currently understood as feminine. And that when males become feminine, the lessening in sexual dimorphism signals the lessening of it's need, and thus lessening need of men.
/r/TheRedPill26/12/15 09:26 AM
3

Turns out the path of least resistance was your sister.
/r/askTRP25/12/15 01:32 PM
13

*Younger girls are more likely to ride you than older. Something about confidence.
/r/askTRP25/12/15 01:05 PM
6

Your argument is resting on low probability. You labelled me as a pedophile based on a low probability event. There is no claim that his sister is sexually retarded. What issue do you have with guys banging young females?
/r/askTRP25/12/15 11:38 AM
2

face Free this. Free that. Free with purchase. WHAT DO YOU MEAN FREE WITH PURCHASE.
/r/TheRedPill25/12/15 11:30 AM
20

Pedophile: one interested in pre-pubescent people. Average age of female puberty: 12, 80% within range of 10-14. Therefore, fucking 17yo: not pedophilic.
/r/askTRP25/12/15 11:10 AM
58

If you are curious why a 30yo would fuck a 17yo: *tight body. no flab. tight ass and firm tits *low baggage. willing to be adventerous *subserviant
/r/askTRP25/12/15 11:08 AM
14

Your sister provides a warm welcome to him. Nothing wrong with the guy, and you know your sister is not innocent. There is no problem with her, the problem is expectations. Perhaps the shock of expecting innocence, but seeing indecency. Would the issue be different if your sister was 18 and him 30? And we can ask, "What does she owe her family?", in regards to her actions. If your family dislikes her actions, they can not support her. In a year, they can kick her out. But she is an adult exercis…
/r/askTRP25/12/15 10:54 AM
2

TY for link. Perhaps Canada will happen same time as USA (doubtful). 50% max ad reduction. Still going to use Firefox, it's too bad Adobe has stopped creating drivers for Linux. Stuck with Chromium there.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/15 04:44 PM
3

Good to know. Still am Firefox noob. Yes, blocks all ads. There is a checkbox to allow "good ads" that is enabled by default. After that, smooth sailing (on Firefox). What will youtube charge for no ads? $20 would be no problem for most.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/15 04:29 PM
2

Is it hard to install AdBlock at work?
/r/TheRedPill09/12/15 03:40 PM
2

It is game theory. But most (women and men) figure they respect the freedom of others.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/15 03:51 AM
24

you'd be a fool not to fight back with any means necessary By principle, those who disagree with this, think that if someone steals your wallet, you have no right to take it back.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/15 11:52 PM
3

While you're probably trolling, here is clarification: It's a metaphor.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/15 11:42 PM
4

All is fair in love and war. Love IS war. Few people make every decision based on principle. If someone DOES make every decision based on principle, that is when they can demand others do the same. But until someone makes every decision based on principle, they cannot demand it from others. That is being a hypocrite.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/15 05:39 PM
6

You failed to nuance your emotionally-driven argument. I will answer the question: "Would you encourage an abortion if a lover intended to violate your consent (to not support an unwanted child)?" Yes.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/15 05:19 PM
2

Your comment assumes I act on my situation, rather than principle. The first is how women act, the second is how men act.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/15 04:52 PM
5

I said how much the market would bear according to the good it will cause men. If there are 2 or more products, who do not collude, I could see the treatment being $200. I am worried that the power given to men by Vasagel will have bad repercussions. Probably increased welfare payments to women, perhaps more affirmative action. How many times/days will a man be able to fuck a women before he is obligated to support her? I think the biggest effect will be increased affirmative action employment p…
/r/TheRedPill08/12/15 02:52 PM
1

not limiting your options. I agree with this. But I would sooner get on my knees and pray to Apollo before enlisting the effect of guilt on women.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/15 02:46 PM
3

Ah, figured you were up in arms. Was ready to lay down, but that was the animal in me. It will never be fair.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/15 02:44 PM
6

Guilt happens when one believes he wronged another, but that another wronged him. When one uses the law to steal another's freedom, then taking your freedom back is not immoral. And thus should not (logically) inspire guilt.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/15 02:43 PM
3

I understand that you are discouraging circumventing justice. But justice is not applied to all wrongs. And 'justice' is often hijacked by the will of the people, rather than any principles. While my post does not encourage circumventing the courts, it should be asked, "Does one not have the right to justice when the courts do not apply justice?" Laws need to be based on principle. Not "what is demanded for the welfare of x group," such to win elections.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/15 02:36 PM
4

but I also don't advocate being decent 100% of the time... just as much as you reasonably can. One is not obliged to treat others better than they treat you. I understand how some are concerned about morals, and that is a very male thing to do. Without such concern, males could have no honor, and thus suffer within the tribe. But it must be understood: That when one treats you immorally, they can no longer demand that you treat them morally.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/15 02:32 PM
51

If you don't have your balls molested by the urologist, your anus may be raped by society.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/15 02:28 PM
18

Women take freedom (the dollar), using the (morally-ambiguous) law to make men pay. Men have the right to take their freedom back, even if the original perpetrator (woman) suffers collateral damage.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/15 02:26 PM
6

The issue is not that men dislike children, it's that men dislike being controlled. Being controlled creates wars. The US is founded on people being free. When women become the tyrants, you can expect war to happen.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/15 02:23 PM
1

$1000. The market would bear $5000, perhaps $10000.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/15 02:21 PM
15

All is fair in love and war. This is what men need to remember. However I feel that guilt is almost pointless. As a man, guilt works. As a women, guilt is managed by the hamster. However playing into the women's self-interest is great. According to women, they themselves exist. All else is irrelevent.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/15 02:19 PM
13

If someone steals $1 from you, do you not have the right to take it back? Sometimes you may need to burn his house to find the $1, but it is yours.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/15 02:10 PM
29

The book "Bionomics," by Michael Rothschild. Shows how capitalism and nature are the same. While women may think they are morale, they aren't. It the same way that communists say they are anti-capitalist, but pay the least to receive the most. The hamster is women's moral justification machine. Here's an experiment: -Notice moral misalignment in a female's actions according to her moral beliefs. -Point out such misalignment. -Her espoused morals will not change, only the moral ramifications of t…
/r/TheRedPill08/12/15 02:05 PM
31

The most moral person respects the ability to shape one's own life. But when one party does not respect the other's ability to shape their life, then neither party is required to acknowledge this right. While TRP is amoral, the OP's DT strategy is not even immoral. It's playing by the same rules as your opponent.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/15 01:15 PM
1

Supply and Demand. If women think your demand is high and their supply is low, then they WILL drive up their prices and decrease their services. Abundance Mentality is letting them know, that their price cannot be driven up. A women's value is obvious, a man's must be demonstrated. But you are lucky here, in that women can be tricked. Demonstration can be mostly fabricated, and they will struggle to know the difference. Fake it till you make it.
/r/askTRP03/12/15 03:55 PM
1

I am saying that if you want to affect women's behavior, you need to affect them emotionally. Like you say, bossing them and making them beg. Rational thought and women is like oil and water in a cup. You can get them to interact, but without constant mixing, they will separate, and have only marginal contact with each other.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/15 11:07 PM
1

You cannot negotiate desire like it's a contract. At no point in my post did I reference this, even tangentially. Women seek their own reward in chasing the Alpha. Every human has the same emotional desires, and emotional urges are what causes sexual relations. implies that you are dealing with two rational human beings. The subject of my post is the emotional (irrational).
/r/TheRedPill30/11/15 03:53 PM
1

It seems you understand my post differently than intended. Infact I question whether or not you read past the first paragraph. And it's not that I reject your counter-information, it's that reading 1/4 the article, then stating This isn't a good post. is absurd. I do not speak of "consent contract," I speak of "consent to terms of a contract." Not that one must consent to sex (and be attracted to you) if you provide another with goods. I am actually saying that consent already granted (sex) for …
/r/TheRedPill30/11/15 03:49 PM
1

I have trouble reading brainfuck articles. I think it has to do with how I learn. When I read anything, I naturally look for cause/effect, logical implications, and examples of said phenomena in real life. Thus when I read any article that is sloppily conceived, especially any brainfuck article, I find it EXTREMELY taxing. I could probably do it by adjusting my mindset to the activity of reading random words, but I am a man, and life requires men to make sense of it, and tell women what life say…
/r/TheRedPill30/11/15 02:55 PM
1

The Young-Girl understands all relationships on the basis of contracts, and more precisely on the basis of revocable contracts that can be taken back at any time depending on the interests of the contractees. This, as I understand, is Briffault's Law. What is the different between "The Young-Girl", and "The Young-Girl, who is disturbed by love"? I understand the latter as one who respects contracts, but do not understand what "disturbed by love" means. Is your first paragraph from a book or spee…
/r/TheRedPill30/11/15 02:46 PM
1

Whereas you say indicate female inputs being sexual gratification of males, I am speaking of female inputs towards reproduction. While we are seeing your female input (sexual gratification of males) affect how men treat women, this input by women is manifestation of the surplus of male inputs. That is, women are using sex to scour men for their surplus of outputs. Yes I want a strong society, but ostracizing sluts will never happen when the supply/demand of fertile-females to resource-acquiring-…
/r/TheRedPill11/11/15 09:03 PM
1

Drama between men? Drama is women's way of using the past to manipulate people in the future. As a man, your future is your creation. Men can have disagreements, but they should not remain in your mind. Also realise its your girlfriend who failed, this guy is not at fault. If your ex sees you unphased by the presence of this guy, it will be easy to bang her (if that's what you want).
/r/askTRP31/10/15 04:58 PM
1

You think you're not going to put out, but it's a fact I won't be pulling out.
/r/askTRP27/10/15 07:01 PM
0

Great. The sugar in the chocolate will help sympathise with his pain when my cavities hurt. Just need to find the appropriate smell....fire?
/r/askTRP27/10/15 06:45 PM
1

Women are not so much as joke, as much as the concept of a women being independent and successful is wrong. Don't hate women, instead lead them where they need to go, if only they knew how.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/15 02:58 PM
1

Non-believer, for the reason that by definition, a man does not have a god. He serves to further his interests. Women are looking for leadership, and their gods are the men who support them.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/15 02:08 PM
4

"All is fair in love and war." Relationships are both, but primarily the second. Women will deny it, but only by cognitive dissonance. If you attempt to make decisions fairly, you will be alone, and suffer the consequences of those who make decisions less altruistically. While ending the LTR is probably your best move, the reason is not because it favours fairness/honesty. The actual reason is that is manages expectations, because when women's expectations do not match reality, they become dange…
/r/askTRP27/10/15 01:17 PM
3

Agreed. TRP is the mindset to accomplish one's goals, and this is possible from conception to death.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/15 11:19 AM
2

It's perverse when men who want to explore and innovate look to women for support/guidance. While men and women do benefit from each other's existence, we only benefit the other by succeeding in the path unique to our gender. You got to let them know what kind of MAN you are so they know what kind of GIRL to be. (MAN: leader GIRL: follower)
/r/TheRedPill27/10/15 11:16 AM
4

Marry her. But keep in touch. I have popcorn.
/r/askTRP27/10/15 10:36 AM
-2

Does she have hole between legs? Yes: slut
/r/askTRP26/10/15 07:57 AM
0

That is primal behaviour, which women take part in more than men.
/r/TheRedPill24/10/15 08:42 AM
2

Man's cooperation stops when you directly limit his reproductive ability. However short of that, men do cooperate.
/r/TheRedPill23/10/15 03:16 PM
11

Men and women both speak. One might assume both speak from rational faculty. Wrong. Not bad, just wrong. Men's speech is formulated by response of logic. Women's speech is formulated by response to emotion. Again, not bad that it's different, but the assumption that men/women formulate speech the same is wrong. Men are our specie's builders, and thus their rational faculty encourages value-creation, which is (currently) best achieved through cooperation. Men use logic to determine how to best se…
/r/TheRedPill23/10/15 07:06 AM
6

Is her anus also having it's period?
/r/askTRP23/10/15 05:09 AM
1

The movie the scene from..Fight Club.. in anarchistic, very close to TRP. If you had included another picture perhaps you could have gone unnoticed.
/r/askTRP18/10/15 02:42 AM
1

Women want to be handled. Like a dog. Imagine a leash around her neck, and tug at it just hard enough that she still thinks she is leading the way. Make the path easy, but make it your path. Don't ask her any questions that you don't absolutely have to. Even if you are unsure what she expects, do that which will benefit her the most. The worst part would be you having to redo work, but if you ask her questions, it's unlikely that she can convey that which she wants, as she imagines everyone want…
/r/askTRP15/10/15 07:39 AM
1

Her issue was that he seemed unwilling to improve his ability to provide. Not that he did not tell her, her actual issue was that he seemed unwilling to work so that he could live better.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/15 01:23 AM
21

"How rude." translates to "You got yours (sex), but you will not orbit her (unmatched on Tinder), and you did not validate her last text.
/r/askTRP13/10/15 12:00 PM
3

Underwood: crushes unions, strong-arms reporters, blackmails and manipulates colleages. While his actions are unethical from a freedom point of view, he is an animal surviving in his environment: that environment is the creation of the populace. And such is TRP.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/15 04:51 PM
16

Without law (contracts), society is primal. When you make a contract with anyone but a spouse, you measures to enforce it. With marriage, the rules are subject to the judge's empathy, but only for the children/wife.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/15 04:46 PM
1

p. 41 of referenced book. The following quote is actually Scheler's words, but is referenced in "Envy, a Theory of Social Behavior." "The woman, because she is weaker and hence more vindictive, and by very reason of her personal, unalterable qualities is forced to compete with other members of her sex for man's favour, generally finds herself in such a 'situation.' " Situation refers to the woman being envious and unable to attain that which she is envious for. While I did create this thread, I …
/r/TheRedPill29/09/15 07:35 AM
2

While my solution (no vote for women) can improve our freedom, I believe the core of the problem is our inability to choose the people with whom we support a certain bureaucracy. This means that our unchosen peers are safe from ostracism and exclusion because they vote for laws that force us to treat them a certain way instead of negotiating transactions with which we agree. And I don't believe we are prisoners to this system. I am interested in ways the anonymity of the internet can enable us t…
/r/TheRedPill26/09/15 01:20 AM
-1

TRP is about developing our minds and our bodies. That is the method by which we achieve the goal our image shows: reproductive success. My post develops our mind in our understanding of women's instincts.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/15 08:04 PM
2

It's odd that we DEMAND political actions to change when we vote for continuation of said political actions.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/15 08:01 PM
1

I began by suspecting epicaricacy is stronger in those whose philosophy is that of a zero sum game. I figured that the females mode of survival favours taking (resources from men) than creating (acquiring resources from other species). Combined with a mans risk of non cooperation (violence, theft) vs the females (social exclusion), I suspect that women naturally developed a greater epicaricacal instinct. I still have lots of developing this idea, I am posting this to reddit for criticism of my l…
/r/TheRedPill25/09/15 07:50 PM
4

I never said men should vote, and even suggested that no voting from anyone was best.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/15 01:40 PM
4

I do not hate women. I seek to understand the motivation for human behavior. Hate is what one does when he doesn't understand how to progress. When one resents another's influence in one's life. Love is what one does when he realizes himself or another party could improve his life.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/15 01:24 PM
13

Zero of my rational lies in personal experience. All of it in logical thought, induction, and imagination. While I cannot prove the history of animal behavior, I can postulate it's origin, and make assertions based on such postulations. Thus if you wish to discredit my assertions, it's my postulations you can attack. The logic less so.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/15 11:54 AM
9

Women are less rational than men: feels before reals. While females want males to succeed, they want THEIR males to succeed. Women are more cutthroat than men, it's lucky for us that they lack the mental ability to exact their desires. My post shows that cooperation is natural to men, and that mindful cooperation (opposed to instinctive cooperation) is unique to human males. I explain my reasoning, which is based on animal behavior, including instincts, and rational thought. While instinct is ol…
/r/TheRedPill25/09/15 11:44 AM
3

While we do demonize the affair-seeking woman, she is speaking to Molyneux about her desire to sleep with other men. While we judge her for the damage her actions cause, it's unlikely she has thought beyond her own feelings. Nothing unusual for a female. And while her attempt to rationalize her behaviour 1. suggests she feels guilty AND 2. knows the reason why, <1> is true, but <2> is not. The reason she is ABLE to discuss this with her husband is a combination of: 1. Her husband's cuckolding fe…
/r/TheRedPill25/09/15 06:37 AM
1

Her saying she will not take your name is partially a shit test, and partially a way to test you wanting marriage. It's not necessarily disrespectful. Remember to never take a women's word too seriously. Act on what she does, not what she says. Take the reigns, most women will follow.
/r/askTRP24/09/15 08:46 PM
5

I'm gonna say I loved the "aww you're such a nice guy for taking care of a poor mother and her daughter" from her friends and family. I loved looking like a good guy because I felt like society had accepted me. The more society accepts you, the larger the margin between what they are getting from you, and what you are getting from them. It's best to keep your work associates and friends only mildly more interested in being associated with you, than with another.
/r/askTRP24/09/15 08:41 PM
0

Women are not loyal because they benefit most by trading sex for resources. Men are loyal to the mothers of his children. While women may be unconditionally loyal, it is irrational. And men's loyalty to the mother of his offspring is relative to the biological fitness of his child. Thus its a cost/benefit game based on genetic perpetuation.
/r/askTRP11/09/15 10:17 AM
2

Men are brave at the cost of risk, and women accept safety of the cost of control. Society is increasingly demanding safety at the cost freedom, and while this increasingly-feminine society is safe, its growth is slowing. And perhaps this slowing is needed, perhaps its nature's way of maintaining life. Exponential growth will lead to extinction. But even if nature has societies cycle between femininity and masculinity, we humans do have a mind enabling rational thought, and thus choice. Intact o…
/r/TheRedPill11/09/15 09:50 AM
1

Don't put "unicorn" in quotes in your usage.
/r/askTRP07/09/15 03:26 AM
5

I agree. Often we must hit rock-bottom to recognize our bad habits, and know what everyone will abandon us if we continue our bad habits. Supporting someone who continues bad habits is helping them maintain them and preventing them from improving.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/15 04:08 AM
2

Calgary if you want employment opportunities. Lots of entry-level jobs in rural Manitoba/Saskatchewan/Alberta. Why do you want Vancouver and Toronto?
/r/askTRP12/08/15 03:39 AM
1

OP's list massive in comparison. Seems like exponential growth in TRP, and thus understanding of the sexes.
/r/TheRedPill29/07/15 03:55 AM
0

While warlords are in charge, we put them there, and our need to feel safe maintains our support for them. While most would likely object to the unfairness created by government, we rationalize or simply don't perceive its harm. While we always express our hate for the non-change of government actions, its silly to expect them to change while we don't.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/15 06:35 AM
6

You mean the world viewing politics as parties who are evil while the electorate are good? Or how everyone rationalizes govt redistribution as fair? Or how the electorate focus on trivial decisions while the government and its policies are cancer and parasites?
/r/TheRedPill18/07/15 03:57 PM
7

The women who value philosophy and abstractions seem male. More dominant, more aggressive, less likely to concede to a males power. At least not mentally. I'm curious how they are in bed.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/15 03:53 PM
0

Its not the shades of grey causing non-understanding, its you contradicting yourself within the same comment.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/15 01:27 PM
1

You contradict yourself, and make clarifications with arbitrary binary meanings- one is you agreeing with me, the other not. However you describe your opinion the same as mine, except with less detail. Thus I expect there to be additional nuance hidden, or information you did not include in your point. When you explain neither is true, you have explained your opinion of events as a subset is mine- but still someway disagree with me.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/15 01:10 PM
1

The first part of this comment touts that there was no plan for these decisions, yet later in the same comment you suggest Pao was hired because it (controversial decisions) would go down easier. The only opinion in this statement I do not see conflicting, is that Pao had some guilt in these decisions.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/15 12:51 PM
1

In your second paragraph you state Pao is not meant to be the fall guy, and in your third you state she was a better fall guy than a man would have been. But you still allude to a female chairman being used by Reddit to survive the controversy. Is it you figure my focus was Pao as the chairman as opposed to any other female? If so, I suggested Pao was a good choice because she is naturally associated with the changes made, and thus Redditors more easily accepted Pao as the fall guy. But I do agr…
/r/TheRedPill17/07/15 11:36 AM
2

I look forward to small communities. Everything big is always touted as efficiency, but the losses are always massive.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 05:00 PM
1

Even if you had complete defense from the outside, people inside would ruin your security. And distribution of food won't work without money. Degradation of equipment would also make maintaining crop growth hard.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 04:59 PM
1

I don't think we can stop 'giving.' I think people will form groups of 500 who grow and defend food and other resources.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 03:41 PM
1

So you will have a starving army trying to keep cities under control. I'm not sure cities will be important, but perhaps those potatoes farms in Idaho may need guard. One potatoe per person per week. And with so little fertile land person in the US, fleeing to the country to ravage the crops will not work beyond a few years. Its tough to imagine massive death in the USA, but how will people survive once the dollar is worth nothing? No trade, no economy.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 03:38 PM
1

I'm not USA member. Canada here. Healthcare is mediocre, and we pay lots for it. I see the USAs biggest waste in the hospitals. Thing is, here people view the ACA as a step forwards, when infact it may be the greatest failure the USA has made, only second to providing ANY welfare programs. At least the insurance companies are emulating your government. Ponzi schemes throughout. I don't predict healthcare will ever be explicitly denied, even with the fall of all insurance companies. Its the treat…
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 03:10 PM
1

Yeah, I agree you were starting to lose touch with reality there. I believe short circuiting is the way to go. The system will fry (more money, but less value. Inflation is going to hit hard.) Those who rely on the government are able to survive, but thriving is done by those who innovate and create more value than their competitor (even I'd we are comparing factory workers). Once society is hurting and death and disease are rampant, the populace will see the good of freedom and of work. But by …
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 02:37 PM
1

When you think of people resorting to stealing, this will happen when people see less value in cooperation than taking by force. While riots will allow governments to take further control, disease will cure us of urban populace, and thus of the communist voterbase. I believe it will be at this point when people once again see the value in cooperation. We agree that America and Europe are declining in freedom and prosperity. Perhaps neither of us is sure how low we will hit. We know freedom in al…
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 02:19 PM
1

While I concede the statists won the moment government was introduced, I expect freedom to come and go many times. Do you expect freedom to not be popular for a long time?
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 01:59 PM
2

You mention they plan to take control of productive people. Even if we assume that enough people will always remain working to feed/clothe people, its unlikely our standards of living will continue to grow. Our standard of living is still increasing because of its momentum over the last century. However the losses in motivated people and outdated infrastructure are not immediately apparent. And while I agree our society will have ever increasing prevelance of those who do not create value, I bel…
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 01:52 PM
1

While some of us understand that limitations on human choice is detrimental, even though we cannot prove it beyond doubt. Even at our worst, which will come, human freedom will blamed for the perils of our situation. However at this time those who lead will show everyone how freedom is the prime mover of human achievement.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 01:16 PM
1

One can either assume Reddit's board wanted to waste money and burn its userbase, and thus hired Pao. Or we can assume these businesspeople are not idiots, and they hired Pao to play a role in Reddit's development.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 12:54 PM
1

While those who know the importance of free speech are the minority, its importance is realized by those with strong rationalization. And we need those to lead. However it seems that no matter how determined a country's economic leaders may be, even they are susceptible to the overbearing government. Hillary 2016. May it get bad fast so that my lifetime sees it getting better.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 12:49 PM
1

Pao made Reddit more palpable to advertisers. The subs banned make some feel uncomfortable, also Reddit does not want to be associated with groups that make their users uncomfortable.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 12:01 PM
0

First, ofc they knew they were going to make many changes. Its silly to think a company places it's profitability in the hands of someone they know is liable to seriously affect it. The money spent on Pao is the cost of these changes not being attributed to Reddit's long time CEOs.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 11:54 AM
6

I believe the reason men support statism while claiming to be TRP is because they do not understand the effect of government in the sexual or monetary economies.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 08:05 AM
-2

You should not hate the movement, as its intentions are the same as every man and woman's: wealth and power. What is wrong and worth hating is democratic rule, as it limits freedoms and steals from others. Democratic rule favors those who produce the least, while stealing from those who produce the most. Don't hate the player, hate the game.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 06:50 AM
2

Pls fix: Fever is the EPISODE name, <Reply All> is the podcast's name.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/15 07:37 PM
2

Is your general concern that nepotism is destructive and anti-meritocratic?
/r/TheRedPill23/06/15 07:56 PM
2

I dispute that one's meritocracy entitles one to success. That is, one's effort can not solely determine one's success. Environments change, and while one's ability to work 'morally' (in tribal cultures) was important, today's setting favors one's ability to climb on top of other to achieve success. And these people who most successfully steal from others amass the most wealth, and amassment of wealth is favorable to employers. I do link genetics to wealth-creation, because I do link wealth-crea…
/r/TheRedPill23/06/15 07:42 PM
6

You asserted two people equal in every way, and are asking who should get the job? In this case, the only difference would be the name, and even this poses a strategic decision. Hiring the one with the less popular name decreases the probability of having multiple employees with the same name, and thus lowering confusion. The fallacy here is assuming multiple people being equal is a possibility, much less a problem.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/15 07:23 PM
1

Depends if the size of your dick vs the size of her mouth.
/r/askTRP23/06/15 07:16 PM
4

It is only bullshit if you disbelieve in genetics, and one's likeness to their parents.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/15 07:11 PM
1

My definition of moral is non-aggression. The one you are using is altruistic. Our moralities are opposed. TRP's morality is that of personal gain, and therefore it's how most discussions here are framed. Regarding your second paragraph, you assume that government is more able to know a person's need, and the value of that need, than the person themself. The government purports this myth, but only to justify taxation, which is redistributed, and used to buy influence in industry that supports th…
/r/TheRedPill23/06/15 07:05 PM
2

The argument here is that wealth/poverty of them/their-parents, is a part of their skillset. If there are 2 computer programmers of equal programming skill, but one's lineage has proven to amass wealth better than the other, this one is more likely to know what is valuable, and how to increase value. While this is an ugly answer, as it depends on more than personal effort, animals are inherently ugly.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/15 07:01 PM
1

Libertarian politician is an oxymoron. Libertarianism is a mindset of non-aggression, and exists to degree by which individuals receive as much as they earn
/r/TheRedPill23/06/15 06:49 PM
4

Libertarianism will give more power to the producers of wealth, and less to those who seek to control and redistribute it. The regulations that the government traditionally imposed, will be imposed by the consumer. If there are 2 products, one with labels, and one without, there will be a chance to see which one is more popular, and therefore of higher perceived value.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/15 06:46 PM
2

If anyone wanted to reduce Earth's population, socialist policies do it better than any nuke/disease.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/15 06:40 PM
1

Ofc feminism/social-justice/socialism are of the same motive, and I'd say all victimize those who they purport to help. And they are typically supported by population least equipped to survive independently. Those least equipped are males and females of low smv. We can consider the % of high-smv males/females to see how voting will result. The % of males who traditionally father children is 20%. Considering the 40/60 male/female voting ratio, and that the males who father children will vote righ…
/r/TheRedPill23/06/15 06:37 PM
1

I like to think the constrained as those who realize the changes they need to make, to achieve their goals. While the unconstrained are those who attempt to achieve their goals without considering the obstacles.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/15 06:27 PM
2

Regarding your last point (born into poverty/wealth), the ones born into wealth are more likely suited to their environment than the ones born into poverty. And by suited, are most able to amass wealth (whether or not by legal/'moral' means. And while it's an ugly reality, these are best suited to deal with the world.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/15 06:23 PM
1

Hmm..While elected bodies and industry will never be completely independent, the amount of corruption (in a democracy, ANY power/money interplay between government and industry) will increase and decrease, like the antibody response in an animal. When we (the body) recognize the dangers of socialism/democracy/altruism, we will develop anti-bodies (adverse social/legal behaviour) towards the virus that is socialism/democracy/altruism. And we will continue to shift away from these evils until we a…
/r/TheRedPill23/06/15 06:20 PM
1

Where governments and corporations have no mutual influence with each other, is the case in which Friedman describe how corporations and markets work.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/15 05:36 PM
1

Yes, there is high probability this wife, even knowing of her husband's illegal activity, would stay with him, and be just as happy as she would be if he earned money 'legitimately.' Her husband showing he was not able to know/control the future (being prosecuted for wrongdoing), she lost her sense of safety, which she entrusted him with. Further, fraud and negotiation are a continuum. Negotiation represents explicitly stated conditions, while fraud represents conditions that either side is able…
/r/TheRedPill21/06/15 07:29 PM
-5

I suspect many recent threads are made by op, where op is trying to gain credibility in TRP, in order to cause trouble in other threads, and claim to be a genuine TRP member. Much more censoring would be great against those new to TRP who are creating threads.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/15 06:21 PM
1

"I WISH I was talking to a woman"
/r/askTRP13/05/15 04:39 AM
1

TRP currently is constructive b/c our current community is constructive and upvotes constructive posts. Our detractors can sabotage our sub by upvoting posts not in TRP spirit, and banning the agitators will also ban neutral parties (since their posts may be similar), and neutral parties who are banned will view us as hating dissenting opinion(which is not TRP style).
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 05:07 AM
2

Women's subconscious will ALWAYS seek alphas whether in a relationship or not. The exception is when cheating risks losing a better beta than she could easily find another of. However a woman can consciously choose to remain true to a partner. This type of woman will find emotional/intellectual value in remaining true.
/r/askTRP22/01/15 08:01 AM
0

This sub tells of value in holding frame. I resisted failing. Where is the line?
/r/askTRP21/01/15 08:05 AM
0

I tried this once. Was offered to absorb the female's (landlord's daughter's) rent, or moving out.
/r/askTRP21/01/15 07:01 AM
2

women complaining about there being no real men left This reminds me when I hear employers say "it's impossible to hire good help." Good men/help is not hard to find, however it's competitive. The quality of worker depends on the pay being offered. And the quality of man a woman can attract depends on the value she offers to the man. Thus when society steals a man's power/wealth/freedom when he commits himself to a woman (who is ever-increasingly more likely to want fewer children, and abandon m…
/r/TheRedPill21/01/15 05:12 AM
1

On feminism: It isn't women vs men. It's a minority of low SMV power-hungry women and men versus free society. I feel feminism is the bottom half (SMV-wise) attacking those with higher SMV. The attack is subversive, through government channels and social manipulation.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/15 05:03 AM
12

Left-wingers and feminists want everyone to be the same, and have the same privileges and wealth. However they are not concerned about contributing equally to society.
/r/TheRedPill20/01/15 09:35 PM
-7

What do you mean by privilege ideology and feminism?
/r/TheRedPill20/01/15 09:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter