TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

plugButt Archive

View 0 posts and 102 comments by plugButt on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

This is false. The whois start date begins from the date the domain was first registered (i.e. by rad fem in this case). radicalhub.com has been around since at least 2005. The reason it doesn't have a creation date of 2005 is because the domain was deleted at some point, and a new registration of a deleted domain will have a new creation date. However, having looked a bit more into it, it seems that godaddy (who own wild west domains) holds auctions for expiring domains but does not let them dr…
/r/MensRights23/02/13 12:31 AM
14

Edit See below for details, but it's quite possible the domain did, in fact, expire. /Edit Well the domain has definitely not expired. Whois data: Registered through: GoDaddy.com, LLC (http://www.godaddy.com) Domain Name: RADICALHUB.COM Created on: 09-Jan-12 Expires on: 09-Jan-14 Last Updated on: 21-Feb-13 It's not a new registration, or the whois would have a new created date, and even if it had expired, com domains have a redemption period during which they could have got their domain back. Th…
/r/MensRights22/02/13 10:36 PM
2

Check out the "more information on violence" section. Are You Being Abused? (Copyright © American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists) (404) Coaching Boys Into Men Playbook (Copyright © Family Violence Prevention Fund) - This guidebook provides strategies for parents, teachers, coaches, and other role models to teach boys about violence against women in an effort to prevent it. Rape as a Men's Issue: Why Should Men Care About Rape? (Copyright © Men Can Stop Rape) (404) Resources for Male …
/r/MensRights21/02/13 10:30 PM
17

She's lived in Australia since she was 3, 15 years ago. Leaving aside the issue of the mother being abusive to her son for a minute, this woman is demanding the "return" of an adult, not a child. If she wanted to go back to India, who could stop her? Makes me think that she doesn't want to go, and forcing her would be little better than the original kidnapping.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 08:06 PM
9

"With identical twins, even if you sequenced their whole genome you wouldn't find difference…they're clones," said Dr. Bob Gaensslen, a forensic scientist at Orchid Cellmark labs in Texas. I was going to post how this guy is working from outdated info, but then I thought to check the date on the article. Article is nearly 6 years old! Anyway, it turns out that it is not the case that identical twins cannot be differentiated by DNA. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twin Although monozygotic twins are…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 12:58 AM
20

A quick google finds this PDF. It cites the British Crime Survey of 2006 for the 120,000 number, but doesn't seem to make any claims about genders.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 05:30 PM
4

To be fair, his name-calling was not a replacement for an argument (which would be an ad-hom), but in addition to. His point being that you conflated feminists with women. That the majority of women have one view on a subject would say nothing about the feminist view on the subject.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 10:18 PM
2

I'll post a link to the show on the BBC iPlayer, once it's been uploaded. Corrie is an ITV show. https://www.itv.com/itvplayer/coronation-street/
/r/MensRights30/01/13 01:38 PM
4

Although I can't think why, it looks like that quote came from Erin: ‘A lot of the film will be about the battle and the picketing that went on and the threats and the difficulties I faced,’ Erin added. ‘The feminist movement won’t be hostile to the film as feminism is more rational now.’
/r/MensRights28/01/13 01:16 AM
2

males are here to impregnate women, it's the only way they can contribute to the species progeny He didn't even pretend to think about that one, did he? Given that women contribute to species progeny by being impregnated, does he also contend that women are built to really enjoy being knocked up by random strangers, regardless of their protestations? It's a surprise your room-mate is able to communicate with such an obvious brain injury.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 09:36 AM
3

I read it as the blue line being related to the blue text, and not marking the cases that were reported.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 08:25 AM
14

The husband is not the one facing murder charges. Prosecutors could charge the four with murder under the state's provocative-act doctrine, which holds accomplices responsible when a crime partner acts in a way that leads to death.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 08:02 AM
5

When she was arrested for the March 10, 1980 Would feminists from 33 years ago qualify as modern?
/r/MensRights08/01/13 09:41 PM
4

What about single dads? Not just single dads. I'm a dad, with a partner, and I do the shopping in our house. Cooked the christmas dinner as well. I draw the line at putting up decorations though, because humbug!
/r/MensRights30/12/12 06:00 PM
1

Why is it relevant that she is a mum to be? I don't think it is relevant. I was just confirming that loganizer is correct in that she was not pregnant at the time.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 01:13 AM
2

Those words only suggest that she was pregnant at the time of the sentencing. If we look at another source (yeah, I know, Daily Mail is crap), we see that she was 3 months pregnant at the time of sentencing. Both articles are from the start of December, 2010, and mention that it happened on June 4th 2010. So, she was not pregnant at the time.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 09:22 PM
19

So, uh, where again is the part where she says that MRAs are the reason men can't get help? You really can't see it? Did you forget your glasses? It's right there at the top. Fuck you, first of all, for making it nearly impossible for men struggling with abusive partners or unfair custody arrangements to get the help they need and deserve.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 08:17 PM
2

Wireshark and Bluestacks would probably be a good starting point. I'm not doing it myself though, as I don't have, or want, a facebook account. Not even a fake one.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 12:11 PM
2

but the site is hosted on US servers No, it isn't. The hosting company is Swedish, and the server appears to be in Amsterdam. Contacting altushost.com about the site might get it pulled for violation of their TOS (scam site).
/r/MensRights05/10/12 08:29 AM
13

I can't find an actual citation on that. Wikipedia repeats it on more than one page, but always cites this page, which contains no figures at all (and also appears to be your source). Looking at this PDF from the BJS though (yes it's 2008, but it's what I have from a quick search), where they list rape separate from sexual assault, they have this: Four out of five (80%) of the rapes against females were committed by males. This leaves 20% of the rapes on females being committed by other females.…
/r/MensRights29/05/12 09:59 AM
3

Text from just the first part of the vid: On the 9th of May, 2012, voters in the state of North Carolina (an American state in which homosexual marriage was already not legally recognized), the North Carolina voters amended their constitution to prevent marriage between a same sex couple. The North Carolina voters are, quite obviously, to be commended and congratulated on this most progressive and daring legal stance, taking one small step closer to banning marriage altogether. That most corrupt…
/r/MensRights26/05/12 10:21 PM
3

Just a heads up, you might want to correct this: For some reason when this happens to a rapist Should be rape victim.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 11:07 AM
-4

I avoid subreddits like this Try harder, you're failing.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 12:44 PM
7

Are men stupid? How else can we explain the endless parade of otherwise successful individuals, who by all appearances seem intelligent and competent, and yet risk destroying their careers and their personal lives over the chance to have a sexual escapade? Seems that she can't even remember what she herself wrote.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 08:39 AM
1

In both cases, the only evidence seems to be one person's word against another. Presumably there is physical evidence that she fired a gun. Where the bullet ended up may lend credence to one version of events.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 12:52 PM
17

No use of the words "hate group", sure, but the lead in is this: The so-called “manosphere” is peopled with hundreds of websites, blogs and forums dedicated to savaging feminists in particular and women, very typically American women, in general. Although some of the sites make an attempt at civility and try to back their arguments with facts, they are almost all thick with misogynistic attacks that can be astounding for the guttural hatred they express. What follows are brief descriptions of a …
/r/MensRights18/04/12 10:06 PM
3

It's not just a matter of what a UK Gov site says, it's actually law. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/section/1
/r/MensRights22/03/12 11:47 AM
2

http://www.avoiceformen.com/misandry/we-are-all-being-watched/
/r/MensRights18/02/12 10:24 AM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_satiation
/r/MensRights29/01/12 11:25 AM
6

You are allowed to photograph police officers as well. http://www.met.police.uk/about/photography.htm Members of the public and the media do not need a permit to film or photograph in public places and police have no power to stop them filming or photographing incidents or police personnel. Although that does not stop them trying to intimidate anyone with a camera.
/r/MensRights25/01/12 08:29 AM
4

The program is for prisoners who were the primary caretakers of their parents before they entered prison.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 03:19 PM
7

Kutcher launched a public service campaign against prostitution this year, he called it "Real Men Don't Buy Girls". I love the unintentional stupidity of these "real men" campaigns. The word "real" is redundant, given that non-real men are not actually men (by definition), they're either anything but a man, or an imaginary man who couldn't have an effect on the real world. So he's left with a statement like "men don't buy girls", which seems to be the very point of this article. He ends up agree…
/r/MensRights24/09/11 01:03 PM
1

It wasn't the one about the effects of testosterone, was it? http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/booster_shots/2009/12/testosterone-aggression-cooperate.html
/r/MensRights22/09/11 10:17 PM
5

I agree that it's good that people are even considering an alternative, I just think it's a shame that some seem stuck in a certain thought process. It's the thinking of "I don't want my son to look different" that created a lot of the mess. If that thought process is not changed, there's the potential for circumcision to come back in full swing. But maybe this is the first step. With luck, when their sons grow up intact and chose not to get cut as adults, some of the reasons against it might ru…
/r/MensRights22/09/11 11:15 AM
6

"We just didn't do a ton of research on it. Our conversation basically ended after we decided we didn't want him to look different from other boys," she said. "I now know that's not even a valid reason, Someone actually engaged their brain, and realised that popularity is not a valid reason for doing something like surgery? considering how circumcision rates are decreasing everywhere. It's possible he could be in the minority soon." Oh. :-(
/r/MensRights22/09/11 09:23 AM
4

Maybe people are watching too many porn films, with their 18 USC 2257 warnings :-P
/r/MensRights21/09/11 04:12 PM
4

In Arkansas, Indiana, and Iowa, 14 is just fine, as long as you're not much older than them. In the rest of the states, 18 is not the most common age of consent. So it's not even wrong in most of America. Maybe she wants to live in Cameroon, where the age of consent is 21.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 12:59 PM
3

Bernie Madoff would love that.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 07:26 AM
2

It was the abridged version of the article.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 05:49 PM
-3

I don't know what this is about, but it's important! Acorns! Their/there/they're?, myth, myth, myth. I'm a man, I'm confused, men are confused. You know, one day I actually spoke to one of those people of colour we hear about. Oh, here's some feminists being retarded, but they're not retarded, and there's no contradiction, no ma'am. Oh, and women have rabbit holes! Who knew? Story, story, story, story, story, story. And back, to acorns, or oak trees, or some damn thing. Ah yes, acorns who live i…
/r/MensRights12/09/11 01:06 PM
-19

The bruise also appears to move. In the original pic, it's on her left, in the video it's on her right. It's possible she used a mirror in the original pic (she isn't doing in the video), or maybe either of her cameras flips pics. Not saying it's fake or real, just something I noticed. ETA: Why all the downvotes? You all think I got it wrong? If so, you need to go back to school and learn the difference between left and right. If not, why would you downvote something that's true? Is reality deni…
/r/MensRights12/09/11 09:50 AM
1

Actually, science does deal with truths. Underlying evolutionary theory, for instance, is the acknowledgement that evolution happens. Theory seeks to explain how and why species change over time (and is always subject to falsification), but the starting point is the observed truth that they do change. But, regardless, if the statement "marriage is the bedrock of civilization" is a widely accepted (in the field of sociology), scientifically drawn conclusion, it should appear in a paper. If it's a…
/r/MensRights11/09/11 01:41 PM
0

If it's true, and so commonly held as true in any academic field, then yes, there should be papers with that conclusion. "Common sense", and an appeal to popularity of a term is not evidence. BTW, family != marriage.
/r/MensRights11/09/11 10:08 AM
1

Thanks, will try to find a copy.
/r/MensRights11/09/11 09:40 AM
2

So to back up the assertion, you simply re-assert it? Nice argument style there. Luckily, others have actually bothered.
/r/MensRights11/09/11 09:40 AM
4

Because marriage is the bedrock which makes civilization possible in the first place And you have evidence for this assertion?
/r/MensRights10/09/11 10:33 PM
4

http://thisisabuse.direct.gov.uk/assets/images/content/gethelp_img.gif Anyone else been watching Torchwood? Strange thing for the three families to get involved in.
/r/MensRights05/09/11 03:59 PM
8

People don't take a general group seriously because someone in that group generalized another group?
/r/MensRights04/09/11 10:12 AM
2

"I don't see why it should be different. I just wanted to let people know about prostate cancer and to get people to support it as much as I do. I hope the school will change its mind so they can support prostate cancer next year." Three cheers for prostate cancer! . Sorry, couldn't resist.
/r/MensRights03/09/11 03:43 PM
4

I was eating, you bastard!
/r/MensRights03/09/11 01:08 PM
7

The Maine Supreme Court ruled that Mary Kellett had “improperly encouraged the jury to use the absence of evidence” to convict Fuller It wasn't just the fault of a single, crazy DA. This would also require an incompetent judge and a retarded jury. Fuck everyone involved in this.
/r/MensRights02/09/11 07:10 AM
2

Now look at the top comment on any front page post of 2xchromosome I'd rather not. :-P
/r/MensRights01/09/11 05:30 PM
4

My mother likes to do the same thing with regards to the internet, and how it works, despite that I've been building websites/running IRC servers etc for 16 years. My SO also does it, but not so frequently. But sure, it's just a man thing. Women are physically incapable of jumping right in to subjects they actually know nothing about.</sarcasm>
/r/MensRights01/09/11 05:15 PM
12

Remove his armpits! And his ears, ears get dirty!
/r/MensRights01/09/11 10:17 AM
3

I'm not a lesbian, I'm not even a woman, so my thoughts on dresses and dolls are irrelevant. But that line does ask how else but a "gay gene" could we explain a loathing of dresses and dolls. Mentioning genetics makes genetics relevant, and genes do not explain a hatred of dresses and dolls. In other words, that sentence would have been far better without the mention of genetics.
/r/MensRights30/08/11 11:19 PM
4

Practically from birth, I was the kind of hardcore tomboy that makes you think there must be a gay gene. How else to explain my instinctive loathing of dresses, dolls and frills of any kind when other girls delighted in such things? All lesbians hate dresses and dolls now? And it's a genetic thing? I must have missed that study.
/r/MensRights30/08/11 10:50 PM
4

Exactly. I think it's unrealistic sounding that in the middle of fighting, they wasted manpower pointing guns at her. Or that they'd give a gun to someone they'd supposedly raped. Or that they'd use the idea of rebels coming to rape the women as motivation for killing the rebels after they themselves had supposedly raped the women. The claims may or may not be true, but there's nothing there that demands instant credibility.
/r/MensRights30/08/11 10:05 PM
5

That we're very definitely not talking about rape though gives the comments some context. Instead of them being along the lines of "ugly rape victims should be happy they got any", it's more "ugly women should be grateful they got any, not trying to ruin someone elses life". While still a shitty comment, I don't think they're quite as bad as they would be if we were actually talking about rape.
/r/MensRights30/08/11 08:25 PM
3

She tried to make me give up my seat, but I said no, no, no!
/r/MensRights26/08/11 05:35 PM
9

It could have been a single paragraph. A single sentence if he really tried.
/r/MensRights26/08/11 10:49 AM
2

I think being a man is either giving up the seat or not, but not then writing two whole pages about how it made you feel to give up/keep the seat and how you "suffered" in silence.
/r/MensRights26/08/11 10:48 AM
2

Is youtube just full of kids now? None of them seem to have any real world experience with their own penises. Sure sex is always great (even when it's rape), and your penis always does exactly what you want. </sarcasm>
/r/MensRights26/08/11 01:00 AM
0

There's a difference between not finding someone attractive and not finding someone attractive? Whether it's because you find yourself attracted to the same sex or because you don't like wrinkles and bingo wings, I don't see much difference.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 10:42 PM
1

This is true rape, and legal, and never legislated, just a memo from Obama. I thought it wasn't even that, just some new and strange interpretation of Title IX by some underling.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 06:30 PM
14

If men aren't to be presumed to be rapists, then are the women who do report rapes liars? The most retarded form of argument ever invented. Even if it was a valid argument (it's not, it's just an appeal to emotion), she's arguing that men should be presumed to be rapists while women should never be presumed liars, which, in itself, is special pleading. For those who aren't completely insane though, it generally goes like this: Woman accuses man. Man is presumed to be innocent unless there is evi…
/r/MensRights23/08/11 05:31 PM
1

Daily Mirror also has it. It'll probably spread to others tomorrow.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 12:57 AM
1

Nobody consents to jail.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 06:33 PM
3

So you'll be able to link to cases of this then? You'll be able to show all the bar workers currently sitting in prison because other people got into drunken fights?
/r/MensRights21/08/11 01:46 PM
1

No, you never become responsible for how much someone else drinks, unless you are forcing them to drink, which is a crime in and of itself.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 01:41 PM
5

25193/288 = 87.5 days. But don't forget, you can divide that number by 3 at least.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 10:09 AM
5

So I'll just point you to my previous comment and save going round in circles.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 08:50 AM
9

Yes, that is stupid as fuck, so it's a good thing that's not what I said. The question was "If a dude is drunk and has sex with a drunk girl", which is massively different to "If a dude is drunk and rapes a girl", and it is in this context that I responded. The question is about when both drunk parties give drunken consent.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 08:45 AM
8

Sorry, but no. Crimes should never be (and usually aren't) defined by whether or not someone feels like a victim. Someone completely unconscious at the time of their rape needn't even know that they were raped, and thus not feel like a victim, but this would not mean they weren't raped. Either both drunk parties are rapists, or neither is.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 08:34 AM
3

insane Stop being so ablist! Waaaaaaaah!
/r/MensRights20/08/11 04:45 PM
2

It's "may" as in the first definition given by the OED, that of expressing possibility, rather than the second of admitting something is so before making another point. So, to refine it a little, it's possible that taking back the kidney will present a moral problem (for some readers), but I don't think anybody could have a serious moral issue with refusing to cover the cost of medication. As for why they may have a problem, maybe they don't want to do something that directly causes his death. T…
/r/MensRights16/08/11 11:06 PM
11

Oh, no, that's not it at all. It's all for support of the child. Honest. </sarcasm> Meanwhile, in sane world, judges who care about child welfare do not leave children with rapists, especially not those who rape children. I'd like to live in sane world one day.
/r/MensRights16/08/11 02:01 PM
5

To borrow an analogy I'm sure many feminists are familiar with: Imagine that there's a world famous violinist, who is dying. The only thing that can keep him alive is both a kidney transplant and a lifelong course of medication which is very expensive. A society of music lovers determines that you are the only person suitable for a kidney transplant, and so you wake up one morning in a bathtub filled with ice, and a nice new scar. You also have a note pinned to your chest stating that you are no…
/r/MensRights16/08/11 01:52 PM
66

Exactly this. By enforcing child support demands, courts are exacerbating the original crime by inflicting continual monetary harm on the victim.
/r/MensRights16/08/11 01:29 PM
1

I think we've got crossed wires here. When I say sex is not an intrinsic part of the male gender, I'm referring to the activity. I think the same might be true of ignatiusloyola as well. Obviously, sexual organs play a role in sex (the action) and to some extent in sex (the identifier), but being male doesn't guarantee an obsession with sex (the action).
/r/MensRights15/08/11 05:37 PM
2

Having sex organs is not the same as having or wanting sex. They're also useful for pissing, but pissing does not become an intrinsic part of manhood.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 03:31 PM
1

You missed out cuntface :-P
/r/MensRights13/08/11 05:33 PM
9

Over a recent 15-year period, Rose and Hartmann (2004) found that 74 percent of men and 26 percent of women were “super attached workers”–working at least 1,750 hours in 12 of 15 years. Following the Census approach, we chose to compute lifetime earnings on the basis of full-time, full-year workers and alert the reader that many workers, especially female workers, don’t meet this standard. Seems that they're saying only a quarter of women work a 35 hour week, but they've gone ahead and pretended…
/r/MensRights11/08/11 04:57 PM
3

Just ignore these mods and rockers, they're under the carpet for a reason! Now, where were we? Oh yes, we should use China and Malaysia as role models, because they definitely, absolutely, 100% DO NOT have any triad problems. No, they don't. THEY DON'T! Edit: No rioters either.
/r/MensRights11/08/11 11:48 AM
6

Nope, I did read further, and without a citation to these studies he's chosen, and his methods for determining the best ones, they are just as worthless as anything else. But, I can point out his bullshit claim about why the paternity test figures are not good enough. Women seeking child support are expecting the paternity test to back them up. They are not a group who have doubts. In fact, the opposite is true. Men seeking paternity tests will have doubts, and maybe even more reason to suspect …
/r/MensRights07/08/11 04:08 PM
4

So, 23 to 25% for his own study. Just one problem: Most of the demand for paternity tests comes from mothers who want to establish paternity in order to secure child support. The problem with these figures is obvious. The participants are not a random sample of the population. On the contrary, they are a group of people who have doubts about the paternity of a child or children. No, they aren't a random sample. By his own admission, they are also not a group of people with doubts, as the majorit…
/r/MensRights07/08/11 09:32 AM
2

Maybe you should have read on, even just to the next sentence. Her defense was that of insanity and he took the witness stand to say that she couldn’t have known what she was doing. So, because he believed his wife to be insane when she shot him 3 times and murdered his mother, he should not be allowed to raise his son?
/r/MensRights05/08/11 09:21 AM
3

Peter Spitz is not Eliot Spitzer.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 09:17 AM
4

From the policy link: If the ratio of male to female suspects and victims differs substantially from those found above, departments should be alert to potential gender bias in their response to domestic violence. Ongoing training and supervision can address overrepresentation of female versus male arrests. (Research basis: Multiple studies of abusers and their victims brought to the attention of the criminal justice system [including civil protective orders] confirm the gender ratio as opposed t…
/r/MensRights02/08/11 08:55 AM
89

Kim Shamsky admits she's angry about paying her ex-husband spousal support mostly because he's a man. After all, men are supposed to be breadwinners, not bread takers. "A real man just wouldn't do this sort of thing," she says. "Maybe it's my Italian upbringing, but I don't think it's right." A real woman would know her place, in the kitchen. Oh, she doesn't like "traditional" gender roles?
/r/MensRights31/07/11 03:59 PM
14

Think that's supposed to be http://www.news.com.au/national/stripper-linda-naggs-cleared-of-bucks-party-rape/story-e6frfkvr-1225758211161
/r/MensRights31/07/11 10:23 AM
4

prompted one fashion show to ban thin male models with a BMI below 19 or 26 and 28 inch waists Unfortunately, it's not just fashion shows that do this in the U.K. Despite the average waist size for men being 37 in, many clothes shops sell up to 36, with sometimes a 38 available and rarely a 40. Plenty of stuff is available in 26 and 28. Edit: So I just checked. My average size 10 year old daughter might be able to squeeze into a pair of 28s. How the hell did we end up with child sized mens cloth…
/r/MensRights30/07/11 08:03 AM
2

The theory of a man’s moment of clarity right after the orgasm can’t really be quantified or explained. A theory that couldn't be explained would be pretty worthless as a theory. You just rescued his theory. :P
/r/MensRights26/07/11 12:46 AM
7

Didn't you read it? The financial collapse is all the fault of male bankers. No woman could ever have made those mistakes, because they have magic woman abilities that the men don't have.
/r/MensRights25/07/11 11:51 AM
4

All billionaires are women != all women are billionaires. Even if it happened, there'd probably still be whining.
/r/MensRights25/07/11 10:55 AM
6

You really want a smiling Sharon telling the world how evil ... ha ha ... genital ... tee hee ... mutilation ... snort ... is?
/r/MensRights22/07/11 12:51 AM
4

Sure, male bashing is bad and all that, but this woman seems like a nut. Picking just a single thing: Instead of marital procreation and meaningful intimacy, we have “hooking up,” where sex is for recreation Because sex should never be fun, or outside of marriage.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 11:44 PM
2

Nobody ever simply said something like "Bisexual? Meh"? Everyone she ever met only fell into group 1 or 2?
/r/MensRights21/07/11 04:04 PM
1

No, he's not. SkepChick thinks about quickies quite a bit and jumped to the conclusion that the attendee was making his big move to get into her pants. In typical atheist fashion, she ruled out all possible explanations in favor of the most vulgar and depressing one. After all, he could have been… * genuinely interested in her ideas; * lonely and in need of platonic companionship; * a white knight, luring the drunk girl to the safe haven of his room; * a web marketer eager to host ads on her sit…
/r/MensRights21/07/11 10:57 AM
2

In typical atheist fashion The only reason they even heard about this is because there was no "typical" atheist response, and it caused a lot of debate amongst atheists. If he can't even get out of the first paragraph without that bullshit, I won't bother reading the rest.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 06:53 PM
15

One of them turned to another and asked something along the lines of, “Hey, dude, are you going for bridesmaids tonight?” to which the other replied something along the lines of, “Yeah, the one with the big tits.” As I saw it, Charles had missed an opportunity to interrupt sexist behavior Damn sexists, why aren't you picking up men with big tits as well?
/r/MensRights19/07/11 10:25 PM
2

If by insane, you mean having mental health issues, then no. http://www.mentalhealth.org.uk/help-information/mental-health-statistics/UK-worldwide/
/r/MensRights19/07/11 05:50 PM
1

What does bipolar have to do with anything? As far as I can see, they are not seeking to use bipolar as a justification. If you mean that your experience with bipolar should be taken as evidence that no mental health issues could ever lead someone to do such a thing, you should be happy that bipolar is the worst of your problems. I say this as someone with bipolar, with friends who have much more serious issues, and as someone who has been attacked by a schizophrenic with a knife. Mental health …
/r/MensRights19/07/11 05:42 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter