TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

plushelles Archive

View 0 posts and 77 comments by plushelles on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

You know there are male models, right? And not all models are ‘beautiful’ right? And I’m so over this “natural role in the relationship” bullshit, we’re all on our electronic devices eating over processed sawdust and wearing clothes made from other animals’ fur, if you really give a fuck about being “natural” you’ll go live in the woods.
/r/AntiFeminists14/06/22 03:31 PM
2

Can I ask what the payoff you’re looking for is?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/22 11:33 PM
3

I mean, if it’s the same as a real woman, and has the agency to dump people, I don’t really see how this would help people who’s issue is “women don’t like me”
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/22 09:30 PM
1

Just plain disappointing
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/22 12:29 AM
1

For a med student you have awful reading comprehension, the original comment said that a very slim 5’4 woman could be a size zero, while a size 2 for 5’11 woman is insane. If you were, maybe, 5’9 or 5’10 then yeah I’d understand why you piped up but wearing a size 0 as a high schooler at 5’6 literally doesn’t dispute anything they said. With your goofy ass lmao, you couldn’t use that med student brain to come up with something better than “your mother is irrelevant”? Not that I’m surprised, you …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/22 12:28 AM
1

Just because you’re done growing vertically doesn’t mean you’re done developing, goofy, and no, the human body isn’t done developing until 25. And the original comment was talking about 5’11 women so your anecdote is irrelevant regardless.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/22 12:17 AM
1

all through high school So when you were a kid? And therefore not done growing? Go figure.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/22 12:04 AM
1

Miley Cyrus is not a size 0, what on earth are you talking about Edit: I googled some recent pictures of her to make sure I’m not losing my mind, and yeah, she’s maybe a size 6, 8 depending on the material.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/22 11:56 PM
1

Same, I missed out on so much, even this week I was supposed to celebrate a friend’s birthday but I caught COVID. Go figure.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/22 11:53 PM
2

Seriously, online dating has rotted people’s brains. I don’t want to sound like I’m saying “phone bad” but I do think that the solution to a lot of these people’s issues is for them to just go socialize. Go to a concert, or a convention, or whatever event relates to your interests, just go talk to people. And no, I’m not talking about “cold approaching”, I mean talking to people like a normal person without drawing up a game strategy for the conversation in advance. Go have fun, damn.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/22 11:50 PM
1

every human being in the world unusable because women affected differently Please tell me more
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 12:09 PM
-1

I don’t watch porn dumbass, but have fun thinking I do. Honestly I’m almost flattered, you seem so invested in whether or not I jerk off.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 08:32 PM
-5

I wish I lived somewhere where unlimited access to sex was the biggest problem plaguing society, but by all means continue.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 07:24 PM
-3

So it’s just Puritanism. Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 05:22 PM
2

A throwaway statement. Like most females Mayhaps this is your issue?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 10:39 PM
1

They’re probably talking about something like marital rape being made illegal, or rape laws in general being enforced.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 10:35 PM
0

I just wanted to let you know. Have a good day, keep your head up king.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 08:28 PM
0

You’re not worth talking to if you can’t go one comment without name calling or insults.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 05:49 PM
1

“This thing I haven’t bothered trying isn’t going to help me, I don’t actually have any reasoning behind this thinking but I’m definitely not making excuses!” I thought y’all were all about self improvement, if you want to look more attractive, what exactly do you have to lose? Seriously, you might like it, and you might look in the mirror and like yourself a little bit more too.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 10:08 AM
1

Listen, you can sit here and make excuses for yourself all you want but I’m trying help you, neckbeard or not, if it’s done the right way makeup is always an improvement.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 10:03 AM
2

So? Don’t have to be hot to look good in makeup.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 04:38 AM
1

Again, you can still wear makeup that’s similar in look or functionality and see if you like it
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 04:37 AM
2

It’s still makeup, you could still wear a similar look, it wouldn’t hurt to try it out and see if you like it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 03:44 AM
3

That’s not even remotely true, all of the ripped actors out of those super hero films are wearing makeup, same goes for all of the male models, the dudes on the red carpet are wearing makeup, The Rock wears makeup whenever he does a new “explorer man explores in the jungle” movie.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 03:08 AM
6

Attractiveness doesn’t have to be scalable. A woman might think Pete is unattractive because he’s not her type and someone who looks more like you is. It’s not the end of the world king.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 03:03 AM
1

Just asking to clarify, because right now I’m not sure if I understand you, what is your standard for financial independence?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 06:19 PM
1

I’m just trying to figure out what exactly your end goal is with the distribution of this information, what do you wish to accomplish? Do you want to put women in a higher tax bracket than men? Do you want to reduce benefits paid out to women? Do you genuinely want to make “female” a disability? I’m just seeking to understand your point of view.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 06:03 PM
1

No I want to hear your thoughts, do you personally believe that people should only have benefits proportional to the amount of taxes they pay?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 05:28 PM
1

Are you implying that everyone should only have access to societal benefits that are equal to what they personally have contributed?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 05:19 PM
1

Do you think that perhaps that could be because women, on average, make less income than men?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 05:11 PM
1

I don’t know what I would do with myself if I went through all of the hardships and sacrifices that come with being a single mom only to find out my kid thinks I’m irresponsible because they’re dissatisfied with the person they turned out to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 04:47 PM
1

moo
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 04:41 PM
4

When I was 11 I dropped a bagel and it landed on the floor butter side down and something in me snapped idk how to explain it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 04:35 PM
1

I don’t understand why you would make this assertion, do you have any proof?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 04:30 PM
12

Yeah but radical feminists want shit like government sanctioned equal pay and for catcalling to be made illegal or something, radical incels want the age of consent lowered to whenever puberty hits and for the government to assign them girlfriends and for rape to be made legal. You can’t possibly think that’s the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 04:21 PM
5

So you’re just a troll. Fascinating.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/21 05:22 AM
2

See I knew someone was gonna come up with some niche scenario where it would vaguely make sense to be disowned and condemned for eating ice cream, but for some reason I was possessed by this sudden feeling that maybe people would just choose to see the point I was trying to make instead.
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 04:26 PM
1

Didn’t say your opinion was invalid, I said you would be a hypocrite. Which is true. The situation you just described was literally a “do as I say, not as I do” scenario.
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 04:16 PM
1

If I eat ice cream should I expect my family to condemn my behavior?
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 04:11 PM
1

Okay, but the banning of porn still encroaches of the freedom of others And no, it never stops being hypocritical to ban something you personally partake in, even if that ban would apply to you. There is a series of less authoritarian steps you can take to become not addicted to porn before deciding that you’re going to enforce your values on others.
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 04:10 PM
1

So can hamburgers, or carrots, or working out. Anything can be addictive and unhealthy in copious amounts. Humans can literally be addicted to anything.
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 04:04 PM
1

Well it’s a good thing porn isn’t drugs
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 03:59 PM
1

Doesn’t matter what your personal goal is, your actions, if successful, would result in the encroachment of others’ freedoms.
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 03:58 PM
0

Unironically the best take in these comments
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 03:38 PM
1

You know what, you’re right, you can theoretically advocate to ban something that you yourself partake in. It doesn’t however stop you from being a hypocritical moron who seeks to restrict the freedoms of others because you yourself are incapable of working out your personal issues.
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 03:36 PM
-2

Congratulations, I’m glad you’ve been given the freedom to make your own personal decisions without being shamed or disowned for your choices. I hope you choose to extend that same kindness to others in the future.
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 03:17 PM
-3

If I’m an alcoholic, that doesn’t mean I’m allowed to advocate for prohibition and bully various breweries into going out of business. If you have issues, that’s between you and yourself, don’t punish others for your own vices.
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 03:12 PM
-8

I’m just saying, you can’t partake in a service while criticizing those who provide it. That’s like hating doctors and then rolling up to the hospital the first chance you get, except you don’t pay the doctor and the doctors that do get paid you bully and post to subreddits like these.
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 02:50 PM
-18

I hope none of you watch porn.
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 02:17 PM
1

There’s also scientific evidence that disproves the hypothesis, but I’m not here to get sidetracked. Objectivity isn’t concurrent with education or literacy, you don’t need to go to school to learn to be objective and even the most educated person on earth could be incapable of thinking objectively. I’m not sure why you’re so fixated on pushing the agenda that men are the majority in this population, but I do think it’s interesting that you brought up inherent differences, sounds like you’re jus…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/21 05:49 PM
1

Actually objectivity is the core of being an intellectual, something you’d know if you actually knew what it meant. I’m not familiar with this hypothesis you’re referring to, but seeing as it is just a hypothesis, and therefore not yet a legitimate rule we can use to apply to all manners of life, I don’t really think it’s relevant here, especially since the topic at hand is something you either are or aren’t. There is no ranking of intellectuals, you either are or aren’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/21 05:30 PM
1

I mean frankly I could ask you the same question, but I’ll go first since you asked first. Simply put, it’s all down to statistics, men and women are equally susceptible to bias. There is no evidence to suggest that men are less biased (in fact most evidence suggests the opposite) so why would I assume otherwise?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/21 05:14 PM
1

Intellectualism isn’t about intelligence or education. It’s about someone’s ability to think objectively. This is incredibly difficult for most people because every human is with bias, and those biases were magnified in the past. Being an intellectual means acknowledging that you’re flawed and biased, learning what those biases are, and then actively taking them into account when you think critically. I’m not an intellectual, because I have bias, you aren’t one either, because you clearly do as …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/21 04:59 PM
1

Real cute how you ignored the rest of my comment. The truth is that there are very few people who are actually intellectuals, and the majority is certainly not men, it’s probably equally split. And I highly doubt that they existed in the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/21 04:48 PM
0

Actually I’m using the appeal to not believing every Reddit comment I encounter and using critical thinking skills to determine whether or not what I’m reading is bullshit. It’s perfectly reasonable for me to question their background knowledge when I want to determine whether what they’re saying is true or not. Also, that wasn’t an appeal to authority, in fact it’s the very opposite. Einstein was believed not because he was an authority but because he had done the necessary experimentation to c…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/21 04:44 PM
1

Yeah but we all took E=mc<sup>2</sup> as fact because Einstein knew what the fuck he was talking about. If some doofus with no background in the field started shouting it he would’ve been ignored. I also find it ironic that you’re attempting to compare the life’s work of a well educated expert with some stranger who’s only qualification is internet access.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/21 04:27 PM
1

Define intellectual without looking it up
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/21 04:20 PM
0

If you are so uneducated in a topic that you can’t accurately define a staple principle within it, then you don’t get to go around spewing garbage about said topic. Would you take medical advice from someone who doesn’t know what a doctor is?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/21 04:19 PM
1

That’s not the point I was trying to make. My point is that he doesn’t even know what the word means, and he immediately proved me right.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/21 04:14 PM
4

The 20th century French Philosophers are rolling in their graves rn
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/21 03:48 PM
6

I think that my favorite part of this interaction is that you went to my post history to try to dunk on me and the best thing you could come up with is “haha you play animal crossing” I’m more disappointed that you were too lazy to find something better, because there is PLENTY of material.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/21 03:39 PM
0

How convenient for you, and you don’t even have to elaborate
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/21 03:36 PM
5

Yikes, idk what I was expecting but holy shit dude
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/21 03:34 PM
4

Define intellectual without looking it up
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/21 03:23 PM
1

But ugly women have it better than you because they could potentially be used in that exact same way, right? They have it better than you because they could potentially do this exact thing that you’re so appalled by you’re calling it rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/21 03:07 PM
2

Not really because apples and asparagus are different species and men and women are not
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 01:33 AM
3

No man has the experience of the female sex drive either, yet here we are
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/21 06:40 PM
7

They didn’t say handsome they said attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/21 06:33 PM
12

You did not but at least you tried
/r/AntiFeminists24/09/21 02:14 PM
0

Yes we literally say this same shit
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 11:53 PM
1

That’s abuse. You were abused.
/r/MGTOW230/03/21 12:15 PM
2

How- how do you “use” cleavage?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/07/20 04:14 PM
1

The fireman carry results in the person’s butt being level with your head. This means that the only way their feet can be dragging on the floor is if the length of their legs exceed the height of the person carrying them. Svetlana Pankratova, who holds the world record for the worlds longest legs (the record being roughly 51 inches), is the only (known) human on earth who can not be effectively carried by the woman mentioned in the article, making everyone else fair game. Since we can see that 5…
/r/MensRights23/05/20 02:17 AM
-1

I’m gonna legally change my name to Captain Shortstuff, thank you I love it 5’4” btw ;)
/r/MensRights23/05/20 01:53 AM
-6

Height doesn’t affect your ability to climb lift and move. A man who is five feet tall can theoretically lift as much as a man who is six feet tall. Honestly I see this as a win for the short kings who want to be firefighters, now these men will not be judged for their height, a win-win
/r/MensRights23/05/20 01:15 AM
1

Thank you
/r/MensRights23/05/20 12:50 AM
2

Can you give a source please? Not trying to be impolite/confrontational, genuinely curious and wanna read.
/r/MensRights23/05/20 12:48 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter