TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

pobretano Archive

View 13 posts and 420 comments by pobretano on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
491

False Accusationpobretano/r/MensRights09/10/18 09:48 PM
247

Social Issuespobretano/r/MensRights12/06/19 01:22 PM
123

Generalpobretano/r/MensRights18/05/17 02:52 AM
69

Generalpobretano/r/MensRights28/03/19 04:13 PM
41

Feminismpobretano/r/MensRights22/11/17 01:42 AM
37

Activism/Supportpobretano/r/MensRights02/06/17 02:59 AM
32

False Accusationpobretano/r/MensRights20/11/18 05:47 PM
23

Feminismpobretano/r/MensRights24/09/18 01:37 PM
7

Social Issuespobretano/r/MensRights20/09/17 05:25 PM
6

False Accusationpobretano/r/MensRights15/03/19 06:05 PM
5

Activism/Supportpobretano/r/MensRights20/02/19 07:23 PM
5

Feminismpobretano/r/MensRights21/07/17 04:51 PM
4

Feminismpobretano/r/MensRights21/02/19 08:37 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

"Black men have a toxic masculinity problem" Not so overt on the mainstream media, but in other contexts these things are very common indeed. After all, Opression Olympics is a thing for them!
/r/MensRights09/08/19 05:09 PM
1

Zootopia relevant snippet
/r/MensRights09/08/19 05:08 PM
1

Here in Brazil we have a similar account, "Zambininha"...
/r/MensRights12/07/19 08:39 PM
2

Men are no one.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 03:55 PM
3

Playing the angel's advocate: we can't be the ones growing a fucking human inside us for 40 fucking weeks. It is the most glaring definition of hypossuficiency anyone can think. What will be your next argument? Men being forced to pay his own children's abortions?
/r/MensRights18/06/19 01:19 PM
1

Clap. Clap. Clap.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 01:13 PM
1

There's no death penalty in Brazil, except war crimes.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 09:58 AM
1

Even being a Brazilian myself, I am (at least morally) pro death penalty.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 04:21 PM
4

Yes, it is!
/r/MensRights12/06/19 08:16 PM
17

Initially the women said they stabbed him while asleep, but the forensics team discovered more details about things done against the boy. I don't think they will get any pussy pass, except maybe a lesser sentence if they were men, or some "insanity argument".
/r/MensRights12/06/19 03:26 PM
21

This is that Brazilian case. And it was the most complete source I have found in English language. Even here in Brazil the news about this are scarce.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 03:13 PM
2

Consent to sex is not consent to kids - except if you are a fucking white male!
/r/MensRights29/05/19 05:33 PM
2

In Brazil some cities already created Pink Wagons...
/r/MensRights29/05/19 05:25 PM
1

I will go to the inverse: If they can say those things without retaliation, the same can be said about woman. Humans are full of shit. I could anecdotally cite a bisexual friend of mine, and she is categorical: both sexes are bullshit.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 03:39 PM
1

Aristotle would throw her a Categories full manuscript.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 08:52 PM
1

is not strictly banned in our society. It is way more complicated. Murder is not "strictly banned", according to your "(it's just) semantics". But murder is a rule or an exception? Or it is a rule for exceptions? They are mostly arbitrary and based not on logic but on human feelings. Moral Emotionalism bullshit.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 08:45 PM
1

On the subject: I think the man is the real oppressed in that equation, in that sense: women are the owners of the means of reproduction, and the men are those who provide the workforce. In fact, a woman just needs a bit of sperm (and some food for her and the baby) in order to successfully reproduce, but a man needs a whole woman. He can't just catch some ovum and fertilize them, he needs at least an uterus. Someone could argue "but pregnancy is a risky thing". But it doesn't matter here, becau…
/r/MensRights17/05/19 09:35 PM
3

If you want something to be law, it needs to be defendable on secular grounds, not just because your god said so. A bit off topic: would you buy a secular-grounded argument against abortion even if it was formulated by an hypothetical well-studied Franciscan monk?
/r/MensRights17/05/19 09:25 PM
2

What kind of argument is this? It is called statistical correlation. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=160530 Be happy and go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 09:19 PM
1

OH! The Kenny's classic!
/r/MensRights17/05/19 09:14 PM
1

Men can simultabeously be the oppressor and the oppressed. This is totally compatible with leftist ideology Then I can easily say a woman can "simultabeously be the oppressor and the oppressed. This is totally compatible with leftist ideology". But, why the emphasis on women as oppressed? Was Brian Banks an oppressed-oppressor or an oppressor-oppressed?
/r/MensRights17/05/19 08:26 PM
11

Seriously, I wouldn't doubt of it. I'm not an expert on human behaviour, so I can't distinguish between a book written by a woman and a book written by a man trying to emulate a woman. In any case, the book is worth read, not because it is morally great, but because it is like catching the enemies' secret files.
/r/MensRights10/05/19 02:58 PM
2

Just a small addendum I think is important to emphasize: the circumcision cited in the Bible is just a small cutting, not a full cirurgical elimination of all foreskin covering the glans.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 04:35 PM
-1

2% is a very low lower bound, about those cases with an undeniable proof.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 08:09 PM
2

That would be a good thing, if done right.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 07:28 PM
1

Double Archived http://archive.fo/hRoNv
/r/MensRights06/05/19 07:24 PM
1

Double Archived http://archive.fo/hRoNv
/r/MensRights06/05/19 07:24 PM
1

Oh man! It is from four fucking years ago! https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2b7m42/on_rfeminism_theres_a_post_that_says_the_average/?st=juu95yg9&sh=651136c5
/r/MensRights23/04/19 08:46 PM
0

I did not say men have privilege above all questioning, did I? You said "the idea that men are somehow less privileged than women" is ridiculous. You also said "each sex has their advantages and disadvantages". But you also said "if we really had to pick one, then it would be women". If I just read the two first statements, my conclusion would be "well, then we have two non-comparable things, like oranges and apples". But, by putting the third statement on that mix, it is like to say "if we need…
/r/MensRights23/04/19 08:35 PM
0

If you support men's rights, then it isn't so strange to conclude that "men are somehow less privileged than women". If men have privilege above all questioning, then your "child custody is unfairly slanted" would end with "against the poor mothers". Oh! But it already happened! "Agony of being a 50/50 mum" 50% custody is misogyny! Oh Hell! If one of the sexes are less privileged, if we really had to pick one, then it would be women. Norah Vincent dares to disagree.
/r/MensRights21/04/19 04:26 PM
1

It isn't a men's rights issue (at least not directly). In fact abortion isn't even a women's issue (at least not directly). I will not discuss abortion issues and fallacies here. On the other hand, why are you so ravenous to silence men?
/r/MensRights20/04/19 01:43 AM
0

I'm not agreeing with your "issue" at all. Here is not your reddit prochoice circlejerk, and I will not engage with your retarded "my body, your tax money" rhetorics.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 02:49 PM
0

abortion is a FEMALE issue. And child support is a boy issue, as Hermesmann VS Seyer so aptly demonstrated.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 02:28 AM
1

if it happens naturally. Naturally, the lifespan gap is no more than a couple years: The Harvard Men’s Health Watch article provides various non-biological reasons for the gap. Men experience more work stress/hostility, which can increase the risk of hypertension, heart attack, and stroke. Men have less social support. Social support has been shown to protect against the common cold, depression, heart attacks, and strokes. Men are more likely to smoke, drink, or do drugs. Men are less likely to …
/r/MensRights18/04/19 01:55 AM
1

Thus, this is something women have a LOT worse than men. The man has absolutely no choice here. It is even worse than just the "physical hardships". The man can't say "I am willing to endure all the hardships related to that pregnancy and childbirth, all by myself! All the hormonal craziness, all body changes, all pain, all cry, everything". That choice is completely inexistent for him. It is even absurd so suggest something like that! A "pregnant man" is laughable, indeed! (insert here some que…
/r/MensRights18/04/19 01:47 AM
1

Abortion laws. In many places in the states, women will be forced to carry out unwanted pregnancies because some bigot thinks they have control over women's bodies. I will not debate the whole issue of abortion ethics here, and even your retarded "reddit prochoice" style of rhetorics. Even because pro-life feminists are a thing. Fuck, even Catharine MacKinnon, a pro-abortion radical feminist, was/is against the mere abortion liberation! Her own words: In other words, under conditions of gender i…
/r/MensRights18/04/19 12:45 AM
0

We'll just get this out of the way: Women give birth. That's a huge disadvantage, because, like, ow. This point is so obvious that it's almost unfair. Are you sure? I don't think it is "so obvious". After all, to give birth we need two! But it is even worse: the man can't give birth, man can't reproduce by itself. Yes, the woman also needs a man in order to reproduce. But a woman just needs the sperm of a man - nowadays she can even do that without the classic penis-in-vagina, hell, she can even…
/r/MensRights18/04/19 12:27 AM
0

If a white man lives to 30 but a black man lives to 60, would you claim that the white man was oppressed? Oh! Are you trying to pick an exception here? If we can point exceptions to disprove the rule, then there is no rule at all! And you can twist all female vs male stats as you wish! Or I can twist it as well! If living less isn't evidence of oppression to those living less, then receiving 30% less can't be used as evidence of oppression to those receiving less! That way you have absolutely no…
/r/MensRights18/04/19 12:04 AM
1

Is there some list of these cases? I barely remember the Scottsboro Boys...
/r/MensRights09/04/19 01:44 PM
1

Username checks out?
/r/MensRights09/04/19 01:41 PM
2

Nope. They already cannibalized the black movement, and the results are a shit.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 04:01 PM
9

/r/toxic_femininity
/r/MensRights06/04/19 01:32 PM
1

I'd say men do need to stop the adversarial way of thinking about these issues This is the default way these issues are addressed nowadays. You even concedes that, as part of your "patriachal backfire" arguments. And, again, I am not applying "adversarial" or zero-sum-game thinking. Did any of that resonate? Only those most obvious parts, not the undercovered ones... I have a serious problem with the "all is patriarchy's fault" reasoning. It is just a way to say "if women suffer then men are to …
/r/MensRights04/04/19 09:10 PM
0

actual substantive discussion of men's issues. In other words: a sub using feminist language gimmicks and theories like e.g. "rape culture" and "toxic masculinity" at the same time negating "toxic femininity" and that rape isn't a gendered issue.
/r/MensRights04/04/19 06:54 PM
1

But the dialogue is changing As I said about Chidera "Slumflower" "male suicide is not my problem" Eggerue, the dialogue isn't changing, at least not sufficiently fast in a way that, say, /r/mensrights can be declared obsolete. The more we can shift the dialogue away from thinking in adversarial terms, the better we can change things. Can you spend your keyboard in the feminist side of the fence? Molly Dragiewicz arguing that spending a few bucks to a few rare male victims of VD is a backlash ag…
/r/MensRights30/03/19 01:58 AM
1

I'm not angry. I'm pessimistic. It is easier to a camel go thorugh a needlehole while a leopard loses his spots than the males issues being addressed as something more than the "side effect" of a quixotic fighting against a Patriarchy...
/r/MensRights30/03/19 12:18 AM
1

It isn't just a buzzcut. It is a fucking judicial decision - A Fucking Judicial Decision! - arguing that men are the filthy gender. If treating men as filthy is a so small business, why the fuck we need the Free Bleeding Movement for women? Hey, they even answers whether "Is free bleeding unsanitary](https://archive.fo/fraQg#selection-2363.0-2363.28)"! Oh, let me try to guess: when the "free bleeding movement" scores 100%, automagically the "no men are filthy" movement will scores 100% too! Oh n…
/r/MensRights29/03/19 11:04 PM
1

The conditions at women's prisons are in some ways better than the men's I don't think using bread crumbs (scroll up!) is a so better condition. In fact a feminist activist wrote a book describing the conditions in female prisons. She was terrified by the fact women aren't treated better than men in male prisons! Maybe Michael Kimmell was right about privilege being "invisible to those who have it"... I think there are horrible things about the prisons in Brazil that likely deserve your attentio…
/r/MensRights29/03/19 09:41 PM
1

for far longer. Far longer. Oh! That's interesting! Are you suggesting that today the women's rights activists are completely authorized to fight against gender neutral laws because men (insert 'not all men' jokes here) enacted laws against women? Good argument. That's a good argument! It is in the lines of retribution, revenge and indemnization, things that resonate strongly in the people's hearts. Those who failed are bound to fix the errors, aren't they? That being said, please, do you have a…
/r/MensRights29/03/19 09:04 PM
1

It isn't a accurate quote; my main source is a Brazilian feminist site hosted in a news portal: https://archive.fo/viJwt You can use the Google Translate to help you a bit... But it isn't a restricted phenomenon at all. As far as I remember, "Women's rights" groups lobbied against gender neutrality in rape laws in India and Israel, arguing that gender neutrality would be employed to harm women with false accusations.
/r/MensRights29/03/19 04:30 AM
1

"Your gender is filthy" is a fair reason for "unequal treatment" in the prison system?
/r/MensRights29/03/19 04:05 AM
1

Is a buzz cut oppression? In Brazil, male prisons impose buzzcut to their inmates. The same isn't made in the female inmates. In a public litigation, the Public Defense argued that forced haircut violate intimacy and personality rights, and the state's interest in the hygiene and cleanliness of the inmates doesn't trump against those individual rights. The PD even argued that it is the state's duty to provide basic hygiene products, as shampoos and soap. Also, the PD argued that it would break t…
/r/MensRights29/03/19 02:24 AM
1

presumes women are the better caregivers As a man, I would think it is unfair and oppressive. Even if we concede men and women are suited to complementary duties and tasks in caregiving, this is certainly a good presumption for a woman and a bad one for the man. And many activists, mainly women, routinely fight against shared parenting laws. Some of them even argue "the law is being used for evil purposes by abusive, pedophile fathers against lovely moms" - while they say nothing about mothers a…
/r/MensRights29/03/19 01:14 AM
1

But, doesn't it confirm that, at least until 2008, there was a possibility that a rapist would face the electric chair (or the death technology allowed)?
/r/MensRights29/03/19 01:03 AM
1

The Bible decrees that ... It isn't a mrriage from rape - in fact it is the very opposite: a forced marriage against the man who deflored a woman. The laws against male rapists in the Tanakh were way harsher than 'pay some coins to me'. In fact death penalty for rape was the norm in USA until 2008.
/r/MensRights28/03/19 10:03 PM
1

You’re missing the point; why was being able to bear a child/having a uterus the reason to legally exclude women from voting/higher office? I think I can play here. In certain countries, not being able to bear a child is a legal reason to legally exclude someone from parental leave. If you are a man, you are excluded. That isn’t oppression?
/r/MensRights28/03/19 09:55 PM
1

Saudi Arabia, for example? Once upon a time, in Saudi Arabia, a man and a woman were condemned to the whipping, because fornication. The man fulfilled his sentence, the woman was spared. Why?
/r/MensRights28/03/19 09:50 PM
1

When you have a country enshrining laws designed to subjugate one sex, that's worth examining. Like, uh, Violence Against Women Act? Or things like "female inmates aren't required to buzzcut"?
/r/MensRights28/03/19 09:47 PM
2

“Compassion,” she says, “is not a finite resource.” Maybe Molly Dragiewicz - and all those who think Woods vs Horton is just sheer woman-hating - needs to be remembered about that! It is feminists pushing for acknowledgment of sexual assault https://www.statepress.com/article/2014/11/certain-feminist-conversations-just-for-women/ https://www.statepress.com/2014/11/19/certain-feminist-conversations-just-for-women/ When men insist upon participating in feminist conversations about sexual violence,…
/r/MensRights28/03/19 09:35 PM
1

Protagoras would be proud of you. And Schopenhauer would piss on your grave.
/r/MensRights28/03/19 09:09 PM
-3

bad bot
/r/MensRights28/03/19 08:38 PM
1

It is almost a porn movie plot!
/r/MensRights22/03/19 06:05 PM
2

doesnt mean the Bible doesn't say that ​ Yes, but the whole foreskin mutilation is very far from being undisputed as interpretation. ​
/r/MensRights22/03/19 05:22 PM
2

Tomato Sauce ​ As far as I remember, sometimes a "suicide attempt" is a convoluted form of asking for help. A resolute mind will commit suicide because s/he already knows (?) there is no help.
/r/AntiFeminists22/03/19 05:20 PM
1

The same way it is made nowadays, exposing all the glans? It would be a literal bloody hell to be made. http://www.cirp.org/library/history/peron2/
/r/MensRights22/03/19 05:13 PM
1

All the foreskin (as it is done nowadays), you said?
/r/MensRights22/03/19 03:27 PM
3

The Jews (and I think the people in Islam as well) are literally commanded by God to do it to boys. They are commanded to do a very small scratch, not a full excision of the foreskin. In fact, in the so called biblical times it was made with sharp knives or stones, not with a cirurgical scalpel. It would be impossible to do the modern version, at least without serious complications.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 05:04 PM
2

I have posted about the case in November 2018; a camera footage apparently shows the cableman touching the butt of a female reporter; that footage viralized and he was fiercely attacked by press outlets and the soccer team's Public Reelations in the Twitter. But another video taken from a distinct camera showed he was just pulling the cables...
/r/MensRights15/03/19 06:12 PM
1

- Women and men should be treated equally - Quotas for women in STEM, no quotas for men in other areas
/r/MensRights14/03/19 02:29 PM
1

Archive: http://archive.fo/eFrvy
/r/MensRights14/03/19 02:06 PM
1

Not everything in the world is about physical harm. And you aren't the sole owner of a whole language - in fact, language is a collective/social achievement, and you have no sacred right to barbarize it.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 06:06 PM
1

So, in a certain sense, saying "I am an exception" is just conceding her the point? About Marxism, what do you think about the analysis of VEL, in Marxism, Men’s Rights and the ‘Means of Reproduction’? Can it be used as a counter about the "sex struggle" feminist theories?
/r/MensRights22/02/19 03:40 PM
1

On the other hand, one of his sons are listening to some "true feminist" leaderships... http://archive.fo/ALYOP http://archive.fo/Q0Emf
/r/MensRights12/02/19 07:25 PM
4

Yep, more or less. This is an old Brazilian varieties show, "Topa Tudo por Dinheiro" ("doing anything for money" in a free translation), presented by Silvio Santos. The prank show is a small slice of it.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 08:24 PM
1

https://archive.is/m8L43
/r/MensRights15/01/19 12:50 PM
1

As far as I remember, questioning the beliefs is restricted to askFeminists subreddit. The feminism sub is just for circlejerk.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 03:58 PM
7

Because they think men are the "dominant class". Here is a piece of Karen "girlwriteswhat" Straughan http://archive.is/va413 Highlight: Men who would ask feminists to help them achieve positive change for men are committing a number of discourtesies: They are asking an oppressed group to help them make the already advantaged position of the privileged group better. The equivalent of asking minimum wage factory workers to work unpaid overtime so the millionaire executives can collect bigger bonus…
/r/MensRights06/12/18 12:36 PM
5

how do we have more serious dialogue? It would require serious willingness from them. I can cite from memory one of the best conversations between this subreddit and a willing-to-talk-with-the-other-side feminist - namely, /u/honestquestion95/. Here is a link to the interaction: https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/34yg3r/i_am_a_feminist_help_me_understand_the_mens/ And, obviously, the classic case, /u/cassiejaye1, the main producer of The Red Pill documentary. https://old.reddit.com/r/I…
/r/MensRights30/11/18 08:10 PM
3

I would really love if everyone was so compassive about the errors of the others. Socrates said the moral failures and errors are consequence of ignorance. And I believe that - even the most convicted and serious racist is an ignorant person. Even the most misandrous man-hating feminist is ignorant. But no one is compassive about MRAs, and men in general. We aren't merely ignorant people, we are dangerous, murderous and, the worse, serial rapists of women. Hell, we men need to resort a very reco…
/r/MensRights30/11/18 07:06 PM
1

First video - badly framed, apparently proving the harassment Second video - another angle
/r/MensRights20/11/18 09:21 PM
1

I will upload the videos briefly. EDIT: There are the videos https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/9yufg6/brazilian_portuguese_man_was_falsely_accused_of/ea4kuw3/
/r/MensRights20/11/18 09:16 PM
7

A TL;DR for the non-PT speakers: A video from the soccer game showed a scene where a cableman seems to be touching the butt of a woman field reporter. That video was immediately used in order to accuse him of sexual harassment and as an "irrefutable proof" of the necessity of feminist campaigns like #LetHerWork and #RespectWomen. But, two days later, the "harassed" reporter explained that he was in fact pulling a cable; it was confirmed by another video from another camera. After that, some news…
/r/MensRights20/11/18 06:07 PM
3

A Public Defenders governmental agency in my country sued the prison system in order to prevent them to buzzcut the inmates' hairs. Among many arguments, the agency's attorney argued that women aren't forced to buzzcut. Resuming a bit, a woman judge said a woman serving a criminal sentence doesn't need to buzzcut her hair, because she is naturally tidy and well-aware of her personal hygiene. Reading about that case I think "hey, is she insinuating that men are naturally filthy pigs?".
/r/MensRights01/11/18 04:33 PM
3

That's why they fight AGAINST females' duties. It is an oppressive equality!
/r/MensRights29/10/18 08:28 PM
0

All men are rapists. And if you say "not all men" I will punch your face! (preventative /S)
/r/MensRights11/10/18 07:08 PM
3

If a satire or not, it's just Mike Pence Rules. The same Mike Pence Rules labeled of misogyny...
/r/MensRights11/10/18 03:51 PM
4

Just three times you see cross-posts from TD here, and you conclude that "they" are running a fucking conspiracy in order to turn this sub in "alt red"? JUST THREE??? EDIT: menslib? utter feminist bullshit. As feminists already said: no dick no opinion
/r/MensRights10/10/18 10:14 AM
13

It is certainly a very good start. Hey, this is the first time in centuries a President says men aren't all right...
/r/MensRights06/10/18 09:29 PM
1

Really, we need a /u/GirlWritesWhat dump of all her writings! I always learn something from their comments!
/r/MensRights28/09/18 08:05 PM
2

please see the resources available at Stony Brook University's Center for the Study of Men and Masculinities The one of Michael Kimmel???
/r/MensRights28/09/18 08:01 PM
5

http://archive.is/Ry3tG 1100 comments
/r/MensRights25/09/18 01:20 PM
1

The above quote is bankrupt in a different way. "Would you..." was followed by something along the lines of, "you know, let's imagine there was a demographic emergency in the future severe enough that it might collapse the state, would you support a draft of women for the purposes of producing children? Would you support the government taking legal authority over women's bodies and forcing them to have children? I don't think you would, even in the hypothetical. I don't think anyone would." Inci…
/r/MensRights22/08/18 04:18 PM
1

Saved!
/r/MensRights13/08/18 08:13 PM
1

"Yes", in Japanese tone.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 01:37 AM
2

In my spare time.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 09:20 PM
5

"Smashing patriachy will be good for the men, too"
/r/MensRights07/08/18 02:42 PM
3

/u/musgabeen, maybe it can be interesting for the Portuguese-speaking communities of MRAs!
/r/MensRights07/08/18 02:18 PM
2

A XenForro based forum intended to act as a community hub for the reddit. It will be open to everyone and we will have both instant chat and several catagories, such as an 'Ask and MRA' style subforum. What about a Discourse instance? It can be useful as it has e-mail settings. Also, don't forget an "international" session, oriented to specific countries (like the various regional A Voice For Men sites).
/r/MensRights07/08/18 02:18 PM
1

Yes, it is the divided house. But in the end we know that both would endorse the same misandristic campaign. HeForShe is just the other face of SheAgainstHe.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 01:42 PM
1

Female incels, it would be a cool name!
/r/MensRights07/08/18 01:40 PM
4

Lol, live in melbourne myself, please no nukes! It remembers me that infamous Bible story about the burning of Gomorrah, specifically when Abraham tried to convince the angels not to nuke the city...
/r/MensRights07/08/18 01:37 PM
5

- Black woman journalist parodying chinese man-hating journalist, after that being banned from Twitter
/r/MensRights07/08/18 01:35 PM
4

And she is saying that in a nation with a HUGE genital mutilation culture running every single day. Ah! But it is just male mutilation, never mind.3
/r/MensRights06/08/18 08:03 PM
1

Dickology! Hahahah! The most I use about that is there are cases women can become excited and wet while being raped.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 05:42 PM
1

They are seriuosly trolling. They don't believe in domestic violence against men. The main justification is Duluth-esque: "men abuse power, women don't have power to be abusive at all". In that sense, the "you have a fragile body" is just a childish mocking.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 05:40 PM
5

There is a Brazilian page in Facecancer called "White Men That Did Nothing Wrong - Yet". One of the examples is a famous politician, a former President. Interstingly, he said various bad statements, like "Pelotas is a city-pole, a fag-exporter citry".
/r/MensRights06/08/18 04:23 PM
1

Some people say a thing like "[...], but you can if you want". Like "Do not hate your enemies, but you can if you want"
/r/MensRights06/08/18 02:42 PM
2

The truth is just what is useful to the Party.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 02:37 PM
2

Well, maybe a facade of marriage? Anyway, it doesn't matter much. He would be not the first falsely accused gay man...
/r/MensRights06/08/18 02:09 PM
2

Karma is a rocket-propelled bitch.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 02:07 PM
2

could easily be interpreted as a feminist position Or it can be interpreted as a sexist position itself, usually called "victim blaming". Did you listen that classic "Don't teach our girls to be not raped, teach your boys not to rape", or its 'equivalent' form "Don't teach our girls to be afraid and careful, teach your boys not to rape"? It is just the same thing: saying 'be careful' is victim blaming if you aren't a female feminst, or it is 'recognizing that society has double standards' if you…
/r/MensRights06/08/18 02:05 PM
2

Oh man, it is so ironic at so many fucking levels, yo...
/r/MensRights06/08/18 01:58 PM
2

One for me, please!
/r/MensRights02/08/18 07:21 PM
1

I would dare to say, I know some gay men there are really, hum, manly.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 07:20 PM
1

Save the prints lest anything they disappear.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 06:59 PM
2

Pussy costs money, dick is free! Also, Marxism, Men’s Rights and the ‘Means of Reproduction’
/r/MensRights02/08/18 06:51 PM
1

PDF file
/r/MensRights30/07/18 03:40 PM
2

I didn't understand. Maybe because I'm not a native speaker, but I didn't understand nonetheless.
/r/MensRights30/07/18 01:18 PM
2

> Numerically the most of people killed in the war are men > The world organ's resolutions are concerned only ("in particular") with girls and women MacKinnon strikes again.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 04:26 PM
3

Maybe an archived link?
/r/MensRights20/07/18 10:19 PM
1

Fictional. But it remembers me a plot of a soap opera I have seen in my 10s.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 01:10 PM
1

Discord is a service of text and voice chat rooms, originally made for gamers but now not limited to them only. I think there are so many reddits creating discord rooms because 1 - there is support for linking Reddit accounts, 2 - many gamers use both reddit and discord, 3 - multiple channels for communication between fans are a good thing...
/r/MensRights18/07/18 08:21 PM
3

A conspirationism: * Zionist Occupation Government*. Did you read the comic "The Unseen Hand" by Vertigo/DC Comics? That's the idea: a secret commitee controlling the main governments around the world.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 06:47 PM
1

"Cathy Newman, that's you??"
/r/MensRights17/07/18 06:45 PM
1

> MRAs please come forward to whine about Terry Crews! > Racist, sexist, anti-gay! MRA, go away! > Plus: Petitions against men's rights
/r/MensRights17/07/18 01:18 PM
2

Maybe the RBOMI can be useful for you, too.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 12:56 PM
3

A truckload of links - I didn't curate them: https://www.statista.com/chart/11573/gender-of-inmates-in-us-federal-prisons-and-general-population/ https://medium.com/@jimpreston_36730/the-gender-gap-in-prisons-ee93a6e8f655 https://www.law.umich.edu/newsandinfo/features/Pages/starr_gender_disparities.aspx https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2144002 http://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/70_1_8_0.pdf
/r/MensRights16/07/18 04:56 PM
2

I don't have to tell you that if it had been 6 Bulgarian Men, Europe would have sent pliers and a rope. Not much time ago, two Russian men tried to appelate to Human Rights Courts on Europe, arguing "life in prison punishments only for men" is a sex discrimination. Yes: They lost.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 04:29 PM
3

Good! I will use them in a blog!
/r/MensRights14/07/18 11:13 PM
1

something as simple as where you are supposed to be on a bus. Hey, OP, here in my country there are female-only wagons in subways...
/r/MensRights12/07/18 08:29 PM
3

A perpetual pussy pass machine: if a man says something even remotely despising a woman, like "I prefer slim women", he would be buried alive. But a radfem can say men devised a perpetual rape system against females, in the most glaring demonstrations of a hate ideology, and use it as a way to change legislation and jurisprudence to be more and more against men (and pro pussy pass). And no one bats an eye...
/r/MensRights11/07/18 01:42 PM
1

"Feminists don't agree with Dworkin, she's a fringe lunatic" Catherine MacKinnon is a famous radfem lawyer, and a friend of A. Dworkin. She even published a book, "Butterfly Politics", where she lists court cases and stories about advancing radfem agenda. She is a fringe lunatic with way more power than any "moderate" feminist, how much more any MRA.
/r/MensRights10/07/18 02:48 PM
2

The same Andrea Dworkin, as far as I remember, stated a boy is the future mother's rapist (or some bullshit like that).
/r/MensRights10/07/18 02:35 PM
3

TERF?
/r/MensRights03/07/18 10:14 PM
3

In fact, as far as I know, in many countries where there are punishments for homosexual behaviour, the male-on-male behaviour is punished way more harshly than the female one. As an example, Mauritania punish lesbians with money fines, and men with a life fine.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 10:11 PM
2

parental obligations for the male come with rights for the female as well. FTFY
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/18 09:01 PM
1

Unsurmountable cringe.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 09:12 PM
6

The NCFM IS known for being rape apologists, so any attempt to give them any credit is political suicide. There is at least a famous murders in Women's March, one who even advocates that women murders are pushed by Patriarchy(R). Fuck, we even have the Clinton scandals to count! So much for political suicide? Selective service will not be called upon in the near future. Selective Service's sex discrimination doesn't devalue women's contribution to society? Or it devalues men's contribution, and …
/r/MensRights29/06/18 04:24 PM
2

As far as I remember, NOW (the one behind anti-father counter-legislative measures) is pro-gender-neutral Draft...
/r/MensRights28/06/18 06:52 PM
1

Again: don't tell me. I don't need to listen again and again your fucking "it isn't the true definition of feminism". They do.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 03:05 AM
3

I will reply like the "gender criticals" (Sorry my bad English skills): "Moderate" feminists come to me and a lot of men's rights activists, despairingly telling "it's a shame, they aren't true feminists, not all feminists are like that, I am a good feminist, I don't hate men, I even have a loving husband!, feminism is for boys too, #heforshe". I reply: Don't tell me. Tell Michael Kimmel, Professor of Sociology at the Stony Brook University in New York, who suggests MRA is the gendered version o…
/r/MensRights25/06/18 07:48 PM
1

I don't think this is the "reaganomics" original meaning. As far as I remember, it was about overflowing the most privileged with more privileges, mainly subsidized credit lines. The net result was just more income concentration and inequality. "Trickle down feminism", is almost the same: enacting more pro-women anti-men laws and polices arguing that "ending sexism against women will be good for men too" - as Michael "gorgias" Kimmel always say.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 05:41 PM
2

Or the "with women it's worse" reply. Someone here pointed out a "gender-critical" subreddit post pointing out the homeless are privileged because they can be drug addicted and because homeless females suffer sexual harassment...
/r/MensRights25/06/18 05:35 PM
4

aren't really feminists at all A couple of weeks, a man in Brazil announced he will open a help service for men victims of "domestic violence against the woman" law's misuse. The first reaction of feminist Facebook pages was accusing him of being a wife-batterer (the lawsuit against him runs under judicial secrecy, but he said was innocented two stances), spreading fear and doubt about his ideas and mocking his action as "typical male tears". But it is just "a fake feminist"...
/r/MensRights25/06/18 05:16 PM
4

Or "fat-o-phobia"...
/r/MensRights25/06/18 05:01 PM
1

I think Lobsterson-sama would be a better nickname.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 04:48 PM
5

girlwriteswhat replied you and you just said "i don't care". Find it if you want.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 09:16 PM
5

it’s common sense and taught in schools So, what? because they are options, not requirements "Having choices" isn't even a moral ground here. It is as silly as to say "the married women were worse because they are prohibited to fuck other men besides their husbands".
/r/MensRights22/06/18 08:53 PM
4

"Gender Criticals", AKA Terfs? MacKinnon/Solanas/Dworkin style? No way.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 04:14 PM
1

Thanks!
/r/MensRights22/06/18 02:25 AM
2

"Privilege is invisible to those who have it" - why not to show the privileges she as a woman has? You can start with the ciminal lenience and life expectation, just to start...
/r/MensRights21/06/18 01:47 PM
74

I don't believe polygraphic tests, but the evidence is compelling.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 01:38 PM
3

Now, the dust is settling, and the facts are pretty clearly in his favor. So everyone who piled on because #meetoo and "I believe" suddenly has to face the fact that they got fucking rooked by a vindictive ex girlfriend is going to have to explain why this was ok. And everyone will quote the "exceedingly rare" cases of false rape as a reason to 'not stop metoo'...
/r/MensRights20/06/18 06:06 PM
1

Technically, every lustful act (made through violence or grave threat) can be framed as rape. We have another legal term for acts against someone unconscious, underaged, &c.; they are punished more harshly. But, anyway, it doesn't necessitate "carnal knowledge". In fact, it isn't even necessary to touch the victim in order to commit a rape. There is a recent decision from our Superior Court about a case on defining rape. An underage girl (less than 12, AFAIR) was put into prostitution by her old…
/r/MensRights20/06/18 10:51 AM
1

!RemindMe 7 days
/r/MensRights19/06/18 05:23 PM
18

Here in Brazil there was a case of rape perpetrated against a disabled woman athlete. The main news media sites report it as "sexual abuse", never using the word rape. As a side note: she was molested by other disabled women athletes; one of the perpetrators even committed suicide. Sauce, in Portuguese
/r/MensRights19/06/18 03:54 PM
1

Thank you!
/r/PussyPassDenied18/06/18 10:30 PM
1

I had lost an old archive-is link of a blog post compilin a lot of that politically incorrect facts. EDIT: I've found it!
/r/PussyPassDenied18/06/18 07:07 PM
1

"Eventually"? It already happens in a lot of ways. I am just painting the worst scenario here. After all, AFAIR PP is funded by taxpayer money among other sources; the Orange Guy's admin crew even explicitly says U.S. taxpayer money should not be used to support foreign organizations that perform or actively promote abortion as a method of family planning in other nations sauce And it is plenty possible to downvote here
/r/PussyPass18/06/18 06:52 PM
1

The rage against her is wonderful...
/r/PussyPass18/06/18 02:57 PM
1

Not for now. But if, hypothetically, Roe vs Wade is reversed by a "equality" reasoning, then abortion becomes an "equality" right, being treated as a medical service at least. And refusing a medical service to a woman can be ruled as "discriminatory". In fact, one of the many reasons Phyllis Schlafly fought against the Equal Rights Amendment was that it would imply public funding for abortions.
/r/PussyPass18/06/18 01:54 PM
3

I just believe the government should stay out of the room when the women and docter are talking about options. But the "It’s essentially just a way to persecute poor women" crowd doesn't think that way. Private matters, but public money? "Stay out of my room - go pay the bill!"? It isn't just PussyPass, it's PussyPaid...
/r/PussyPass18/06/18 01:21 AM
22

AFAIK in the US all states allow the woman leaves the newborn in the same hospital she gives birth. The same entitlement isn't reserved to the father. In fact, Hermesmann VS Seyer ruled that even if the sexual relationship wasn't legally consensual the father is bound to his 'responsibilities'.
/r/PussyPass18/06/18 01:17 AM
2

/r/menkampf
/r/MensRights11/06/18 01:58 PM
1

"Liberating man from his own freedom".
/r/MensRights08/06/18 03:54 PM
3

Another thing is, if I hate men so much, how come I have a boyfriend and get plenty of attention from guys? The same as "hey, look, I have a token black friend" argument. Boring....
/r/MensRights07/06/18 10:15 PM
6

I haven’t said anything to make me seem like one Yes, because defending male genital mutilation isn't a misandristic thing, it is just defendind a culture! \s I support full equality of the sexes. Please, talk why and how downplaying male genital mutilation and using your current boyfriend as an example is a full support of sex equality...
/r/MensRights07/06/18 10:06 PM
4

As far as I remember, /u/berniesandersgirl101 made a subreddit for male victims of rape only.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 01:03 PM
3

Ideas are ban proof
/r/MensRights21/05/18 08:23 PM
2

Why should they, when the purpose of the movement is to fight for women's rights? Because of things like "hey, equality is good for both!" or "when we finish smashing patriarchy, then all men's issues will be automagically solved!" or some stupid slogan about 'toxic masculinity' (and nothing about toxic femininity). Feminism doesn't sell it as a "women's only rights", but as a "gender rights". At the same time, it actively fights against male's rights, as akrlkr has shown here. But it is the lea…
/r/MensRights21/05/18 08:23 PM
3

For a side, anyone can support men's issues AND women's issues with no contradictions, at least broadly speaking. But, as someone said, equality appears to be prejudice for the privileged. Here is a couple of examples, and tell me who is the 'privileged" here: Agony of being a 50/50 mum: Women once held the upper hand in custody battles. Now fathers are winning EQUAL access... and mothers are struggling to cope The 'agony' of being a 50/50 mother? Oh please. It's called equality - and fathers de…
/r/MensRights21/05/18 08:06 PM
4

This isn't about "patriarchy", but male disposability and empathy gap.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 10:24 PM
3

"Disposable male" is, basically, the role that dictates the well-being of men are less valuable. "Women and children and puppies first!" It helps to explain a bit of gender dynamics. As an example, suicide overwhelmingly affects men, but it isn't treates as a "gender issue" - except if to point out "women are commiting more suicide than ever" (and still being above men).
/r/MensRights16/05/18 10:23 PM
1

Thank you!
/r/MensRights16/05/18 08:29 PM
1

Use all time you need! We will wait :)
/r/MensRights10/05/18 07:33 PM
2

your arbitrary standards for language I don't think it is arbitrary. Maybe in the case of circumcision it is (which I disagree), but not in general. Karen Straughan makes her point about it in the Red Pill; summarizing, "we don't blame men, we just name everything bad after them". This is not silly censorship, but strategy.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 05:38 PM
3

I think it is a way to treat men as animals or things; they have value only while entertaining the others (mainly women). As an example, HPV vaccination for boys and men is argued in basis of "it will be needed because of women and girls". Just a #HeForShe mentality.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 05:33 PM
1

Echoing some comments, can you make a full table with all data present on the video?
/r/MensRights10/05/18 05:27 PM
1

0 - Isn't "Asian" a "minority"? 1 - You clearly said "privilege" is present in "google employee". A black woman inside Google has even less privilege than a redneck outside it? 2 - So, 'because numbers', a "fucking white male" can be actively bullied, with zero rights to seek any type of compensation or mending whatsoever? Bully isn't oppression if you aren't a "protected" by social justice tenets?
/r/MensRights10/05/18 05:24 PM
2

If, e.g., a black woman at Google said she is treated as less competent by her white male peers, would you say she is "filling the tub of black tears"?
/r/MensRights09/05/18 06:08 PM
2

I will ask you a question. As a guy said to me certain occasion, the pursuit of truth is a very religious thing. Are you willing to leave the men's rights advocation if it becomes an ultimatum decision - "it will be me or them"?
/r/MensRights06/05/18 06:56 PM
1

"Feminism" is to list actions made by feminists - something as 'Clem Ford presenting the Helpline service of victims of suicide'.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 07:24 PM
16

#ChildrenToo #ToddlersLivesMatter
/r/MensRights04/05/18 05:56 PM
1

There ultimately is still a disparity between people with uteruses and people without uteruses making pregnancy decisions. At least in principle, there is two people interested in the unborn creature. It is a bit self-evident that no woman can impregnate herself, isn't it?
/r/MensRights02/05/18 08:41 PM
1

I don't think so. Abortion is just a radical way to surrender rights and duties of parenthood, and regularly the allegation of "I am not ready to be a parent" is used as a "justification" for an abortion procedure. Even the "parasitical" argument is used mostly as a "moral" rationalization, not as a motivation. And, about child support: to cite a particular example, in Brazil the embryo is entitled to it anytime from pregnancy.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 08:37 PM
3

Oh boy...
/r/MensRights22/04/18 04:09 PM
4

That connection is a bit wobbly. After all, in the life and times of Führer, eugenics wasn't treated as a demonic idea. Here is a Breitbart link. Follow the references.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 04:09 PM
12

As far as I remember, the PP founder had very strong bonds with eugenistic movements, before they were cool...
/r/MensRights22/04/18 03:16 PM
2

A friend of mine had translated it to Portuguese some long time ago. I will post a link later.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 05:13 PM
1

Hello, /u/girlwriteswhat! By the way of curiousity, this is the "king pardons rape victim" case?
/r/MensRights13/04/18 01:58 AM
4

"Pink Tax" = "Why my satin skirt is more expensive that his jeans trousers?"
/r/MensRights10/04/18 07:43 PM
3

It remembers me a "bestof" reddit post explaining that "there is no judicial bias, but only a societal one" in cases of father's rights...
/r/MensRights04/04/18 06:39 PM
7

Citation needed - no, it doesn't matter
/r/MensRights04/04/18 09:33 AM
1

Bonus points if they use the Masculine Norms Index. What the hell is this?
/r/MensRights20/03/18 07:51 PM
2

Voat's mensrights sub, unhappily, has 8k subscribers.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 08:18 PM
2

Can we do a backup of that forum? As fas as I remember, there is a dataset of all Reddit posts, bit it would be good to filter it.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 08:13 PM
1

*I kissed a boy and he liked it not, The * Joking apart, I don't think it was a "very terrible crime". She made a very reprovable thing, but not a so serious one.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 10:30 AM
1

A bit off-topic: It accepts foreign, non-"Anglophon" countries' participants?
/r/MensRights14/03/18 06:52 PM
3

How about to host a screening? Or even to make an impromptu session with your friends?
/r/MensRights14/03/18 06:51 PM
3

Men are incarcerated because they commit more crimes As far as I remember, in my country (Brazil) at least 30% of incarcerated people are in procedural incarceration (they are just suspects, not convicted criminals); and because of slowness of justice procedures and lack of public defense lawyers for the poorest, they can be forgotten for years. On the other hand, recently the Supreme Federal Tribunal (our Supreme Court) decided to send to home prison all women who are pregnant or with 12-year-o…
/r/MensRights14/03/18 03:22 PM
1

Spot on!
/r/MensRights13/03/18 02:48 PM
5

You can be for equal rights and protections for men and women, and some form of common ground. But feminist will always be centered in men as agents and women as acted. The Clementine Ford's retweet explains it very well. Hell, in that analogy "adults" don't need rights because tghey are "powerful" and "stronger"! It goes diametrically against MRA. Even Big Red, quoted at the crosspost, think the same, "all history men always had rights". If BigRed is right about feminism, then MRA is absurd. Th…
/r/MensRights13/03/18 02:41 AM
0

Technically, Aquinas didn't use science as supportive evidence, and the neo-thomists don't do it either. Their accounts are more from a metaphysical standpoint, not a Popperian science one.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 02:09 AM
6

Strangely, so many feminist act that way. When someone says #NotAllMen, they immediately answer "so go talk the men who are that way". Just look at the Rantzerker 102... So, go talk to the anti-whites that it isn't cool to be anti-white. Preaching to this choir is useless.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 09:07 PM
2

Treating "hate" with mere "apathy" would result in nothing - and by "nothing" I would cite "no Civil Rights Movement". Even Thoreau's Civil Disobedience needs a degree of opposition. Not brute hate as an answer, but opposition. And opposition isn't apathy.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 09:04 PM
5

Your examples of "historical oppression": Women couldn't vote As if in all times in all history all men could vote. Hell, even today so many nations block young people to vote - is this a proof that the world treat 15-year-old boys and girls as "worse than animals"? Hell, even suffragettes weren't so interested in universal suffrage - in fact a famous one said: I will cut off this right arm of mine before I will ask for the ballot for the Negro and not for the woman. Allowed to be beaten How can…
/r/MensRights11/03/18 10:17 PM
6

As she already said: I have zero fucks to give about your feelings. I want data. If you're not prepared to give it, then fuck off. And now, you are just to the "then fuck off" side.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 07:25 PM
2

What about a "free killing zone" for men? Or maybe a "free false rape accusation"? maybe Brian Banks needed one...
/r/MensRights09/03/18 12:53 PM
2

Edited because # apparently bolds entire paragraphs It is a (sub)title mark in the Reddit's markdown specs. Put a preventive backslash before the hashtag, that way: \# Or else...
/r/MensRights08/03/18 09:09 PM
1

Always Relevant
/r/MensRights08/03/18 09:03 PM
7

Try an actual dictionary definition and not a reddit post by some brainwashed sexist. If we would appeal to strict dictionary definitions (and there are so many of them), I can say Marc Angelucci (a men's rights activist and lawyer) is a true feminist, against the self-proclaimed feminists running DV shelters. But I like de Trudeau-esque argument: if "mankind" is a sexist word and "peoplekind" is better suited, then "feminism" is certainly a sexist word.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 09:00 PM
5

I don't think so. He probably would say something as "I am just an exception who confirms the rule", "I can learn from that experience", "women have it worse"... The pussywhipped mind isn't so easy to be overruled.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 01:20 PM
54

"No, it isn't a witch hunting!"
/r/MensRights07/03/18 09:00 PM
1

A good arsenal indeed!
/r/MensRights07/03/18 05:56 PM
1

In the sweep of history, #MeToo is just another episode of liberal democracy setting right what stubborn inequalities remain. Witch-hunting is so liberal /s
/r/MensRights07/03/18 03:46 PM
1

I have put a executive summary of everything I remembered here...
/r/MensRights07/03/18 02:39 PM
1

I think the original document sent to Courts contains all these things.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 01:52 PM
1

we need to post this now!
/r/MensRights05/03/18 02:16 PM
6

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7y5de1/from_chris_rocks_new_show_only_women_children_and/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7ye41x/chris_rock_tamborine_speaking_truth_to_weakness/
/r/MensRights04/03/18 02:05 PM
3

True TL;DR - 'we have uterus'. A bit boring.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/18 09:39 PM
2

As fast as I can: he wrote an internal memo inside Google, talking about gender issues in a non-orthodox (i.e. non-feminist) manner, citing some auxiliary studies about gender differences and how to use that knowledge as a way to make a better place to work. The memo leaked, he was exposed as being a fascist white supremacist and was fired. Now he and another guy are suing Google for political discrimination. Google vs Damore suit: https://www.scribd.com/document/368688363/James-Damore-vs-Google…
/r/MensRights01/03/18 01:28 PM
1

They like to ban anything.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 12:41 PM
3

#MeToo is just modern sorcerer hunt, just a "piv is always rape"-based thing. Even bad dates as Ansari's one are being framed as rape, with zero respect to the due legal process rights.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 09:16 PM
1

The main reason I would say is just the same as any oldschol civil rights would concur: equality for all, focusing on the overlooked. "Shared parenting as default" is a staunch example. In its face value, is a non-gendered issue, but we know it would benefit men more than women (not so much, I would say; there are many mothers suffering from it, too, and they would be greatly benefited in a equal parenting foot). But feminist organizations as NOW are actively against it, and some huge advocates …
/r/MensRights27/02/18 09:09 PM
15

> "is prejudice plus power" > the person saying it has power and is doing prejudice
/r/MensRights23/02/18 04:58 PM
1

"MRAs aren't concerned with male victims, they only use them as tokens for pursuing its political agendas" - Every post in cancerous feminist subs (and other septic chambers)
/r/MensRights23/02/18 02:11 PM
1

It isn't us vs. them, it's us with them. Here in my country we have at least three overtly discriminatory laws: Exclusive train wagons for women (in some cities). The hysteria is so absurd a woman with her 11-year-old son was expelled, scattered at the next station. It occurred no more than a week ago. Men are the new Rosa Parks. With a little difference: almost no one can disagree with that institutionalized Apartheid without being labeled as a train-abuse apologist. Domestic violence law. It r…
/r/MensRights23/02/18 02:09 PM
1

Sauce?
/r/MensRights20/02/18 01:36 PM
1

Another source?
/r/MensRights19/02/18 08:56 PM
1

Good bot
/r/MensRights19/02/18 08:54 PM
2

At least she doesn't want to fuck the Bill of Rights so blatantly...
/r/MensRights19/02/18 07:36 PM
1

It is almost like a street magician revealing his (her) tricks! Please, continue...
/r/MensRights17/02/18 02:08 PM
1

YES! YES! Just 10 bucks, it is easy to put it in an online library...
/r/MensRights17/02/18 02:07 PM
2

The (in)famous JudgyBitch, Janet Bloomfield!
/r/MensRights13/02/18 01:24 PM
7

"men are causing most of the issues in society" It doesn't matter. It is silly, as if men were a monolytical class. Or even you can say women hurt women too, as in female genital mutilation in underdeveloped cultures. "Your parents must have raised you to think that" "My parents raised me to treat everyone with equal compassion, regardless of gender. It includes worrying and caring about the men who suffer too" - and you can include some examples, as homeless, veterans, unemployed, falsely accus…
/r/MensRights13/02/18 01:15 AM
5

In Canada you can follow Karen Straughan and Andrea Hardie.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 01:10 AM
6

Don't forget to follow her on Youtube! Now Cassie Jaye is releasing the raw material of the movie there: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCW0XocdjHAzMJmTQIboO8qw
/r/MensRights13/02/18 01:09 AM
2

Here in my country it is in the law: if you live maritally (common law or legally written) with someone, you need his/her permission in order to do a surgical sterilization. It is "gender-neutral" indeed.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 06:59 PM
2

Unhappily I don't know about the legal issues on it (I'm not from US, for that matter). I just think about to be one step ahead if she is willing to use the children as weapons in the settlement. Maybe your lawyer can provide some guidance about it.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 03:22 PM
1

In the case of a DV against the children, can you preventively file for some psychological report from a reliable doctor?
/r/MensRights06/02/18 02:21 PM
2

In fact, garçon in French is "boy" but in other places is used as a servant, like the waiter/bartender.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 01:48 PM
2

champion of all cuckind. FTFY
/r/MensRights06/02/18 01:46 PM
1

The closest they did something in behalf of men was that decision about the Sessions v. Morales-Santana case, and even that was based in the "women doesn't need to be default caregivers" feminist conundrum.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 04:57 PM
2

Insert here some stupidity about "power structures" and "equity"
/r/MensRights05/02/18 04:49 PM
2

I'm not from USA, but as far as I remember, it is sometimes made automatically: if you, e.g., register for college tuition, your name is automatically sent to Corps.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 07:27 PM
2

Specifically in my country, not registering for the draft blocks the electoral registering. And yes, it is for men only.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 07:25 PM
2

Objection: But women are physically too weak to hurt men. Here in my country our "VAWA" isn't limited to physical violence (but, unfortunately, is limited to women only). This isn't a compelling argument IMHO, it only opens a narrow exception.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 07:22 PM
1

The raw idea has its merits, but it isn't the way SJWs think about it. I think there is some fundamental differences between race privileges and prejudices, country privileges and prejudices and sex privileges/prejudices. In a certain sense, race is mostly tribal and well-defined in terms of privilege and prejudice. Blacks were prejudiced by whites, Jews were prejudiced by Aryans, and in no way we can trace something as "benevolent racism". OTOH, men and women are under a different set of rules.…
/r/MensRights18/01/18 05:30 PM
4

It was deleted already?
/r/MensRights18/01/18 03:04 PM
1

NOW is a self-proclaimed feminist organization - and it is so against sexist prejudices that it even supports equal drafting. And it is a widely known fact NOW it is against equality in parenting rights. My intention is to show NOW contradicts itself, a typical thing in the practical feminism.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 06:45 PM
1

It can't be inferred from your text. And this is a bit off the point, too: I can cite some cases when ("self-proclaimed") feminist women's rights activists push unequal legislation and practices, as the retirement age in some countries and the definition of rape in India. And the argumentations are mostly stereotypical: "women suffer more, then in order to be equal they need different rights" (and no responsibilities, of course).
/r/MensRights17/01/18 02:44 PM
1

2) It is lazy and silly. Why do you think women are, in some sense, less privileged than men? You said that having a longer maternity leave doesn't prove women are more privileged. BUT it is very obvious more maternity leave is a privilege. What is your point? That men and women have different sets of privileges and then it isn't sane to compare, or that men have way more privileges and maternity leave is just a rare exception?
/r/MensRights17/01/18 01:25 PM
3

incels, TRP, and PUA ... add "and 4Chan trolls" to the list.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 01:04 PM
1

As far as I remember, NOW holds that the exclusion of women from the draft is sexist and harmful. The exclusion of women from the registration process was first challenged in the 1981 case Rostker v. Goldberg, 453 U.S. 57 (1981). Prominent feminist organizations, including the National Organization for Women, submitted briefs to the Court in an effort to emphasize the inherently sexist nature of this exclusion. The brief filed by NOW held that harmful repercussions result from the exclusion of w…
/r/MensRights17/01/18 12:40 PM
2

A powerful speech, indeed. I remember a post in the /r/Intactivists where an anon explained the "original" Mosaic circumcision was way less harmful, just a tiny slip, almost cosmetical 'surgery'; in fact a baby wouldn't survive if the nowaday genital mutilation was done in that ancient time. Even if I don't believe in his conclusions, he makes a good point nonetheless.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 07:56 PM
1

Helloooo .... is there anybody in there?
/r/MensRights16/01/18 07:44 PM
2

You seem to be suggesting it's a religious dogma with a strict set of ideals and a hivemind at work. Using the "Christian" comparison, there are a big amount of different schools of thought inside it, even ignoring the heretical ones. There are some core beliefs, as Trinity, Final Judgement, Predestination etc., but there are points of difference (Molinists, Thomists, Arminians, Calvinists; Preterists, Futurists; Covenantist, Dispensationalists etc.) In that sense, the feminist dogma(s) can be k…
/r/MensRights16/01/18 07:16 PM
12

Why so much cancer on The Guardian? They don't even try to masquerade themselves anymore!
/r/MensRights11/01/18 08:19 PM
1

Do you have more info?
/r/MensRights11/01/18 08:16 PM
4

Circumcision, too!
/r/MensRights10/01/18 03:09 AM
1

asking these companies for anything is like wishing on a cursed monkey’s paw that turns your requests against you Priceless!
/r/MensRights19/12/17 02:18 PM
5

If compared with other feminists, yes she is wise.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 08:55 PM
1

particularly white heterosexual men Some of the first wavers were explicitly anti-black racists.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 02:19 PM
1

I don't think it is reasonable. For some of them, the speech itself is offensive regardless the speaker. As an example, Chris Rock said a not so long time ago he will never present his "Black People Vs. Niggas" sketch again. And, well, he is black :)
/r/MensRights05/12/17 07:44 PM
1

We can't forget the fact Trump backed its campaing mostly by himself, and even the mainstream Republican Party wasn't so willing to help him.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 05:33 PM
1

"But... butt... muh 3% muh best women's healthcare"
/r/MensRights27/11/17 09:08 AM
1

Practical example.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 01:39 PM
3

I don't think the IQ distribution is about means, but standard deviation. The mean is only a bit superior for men, but the deviation is great In that sense, men are most of retarded and the most of brilliant.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 01:31 PM
1

Yep, but I don't remember now.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 01:43 AM
1

Not so much. Here is an article of JudgyBitch. It's about Islam but touches on the subject about females seeking violent porn
/r/MensRights18/11/17 12:15 AM
5

It is a bit controversial. I don't have any knowledge in Psychology, but I remember about the associations between sex and violence - sado-maso, much? Furthermore, as far as I remember, there is an increasing segment of female-oriented porn.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 06:59 PM
1

(dunno if there are black NAZIs?!?) From Uncyclopedia.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 01:23 PM
2

How do you think the violence against women is normalized? Something about spousal violence, maybe?
/r/MensRights17/11/17 01:08 PM
7

Violence against women, even in fiction, is considered an extremely serious matter. In fact, in the Game of Thrones TV series, men are constantly assaulted in a variety of ways for a variety of reasons, and no one cares - in fact there are various jokes about these: Eddard "lost his mind", Jaime "unhanded", Theon/Reek castrated and become an animal &c. And almost all these scenes are show without cuts But the rape of Sansa wasn't directly shown, nonetheless it was the most repudiated scene ever.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 01:05 PM
1

There is some discussion about it out there...
/r/MensRights16/11/17 06:12 PM
1

"If you ever think Feminism is wrong then you are a sexist nazi rape-apologist fucking scum against rights for the women and girls. But if you think Mens Rights are wrong, well, it's OK! Men in history always have rights!"
/r/MensRights16/11/17 06:10 PM
35

I second that!
/r/MensRights16/11/17 05:53 PM
3

name of the site: "equality now" slogan: "a just world for women and girls"
/r/MensRights16/11/17 03:45 PM
3

I strongly suggest ripping off the nails, in order to prove the theory that "it doesn't affect the fingers"...
/r/MensRights16/11/17 03:41 PM
1

The original post I think we could do a huge compilation of best posts of MensRights reddit...
/r/MensRights13/11/17 07:21 PM
1

it is insane to say the average man has NEVER had it better than the average women Better? Worse? What are your parameters, bitch? Do you think every single thing can be compared with another completely unrelated thing? Men consistently being the main victims of violence and war can be compared with women becoming widows, as Hillary Clintoin tries to paint? Men being subjected to genital mutilation can be compared with women being subjected to genital mutilation? Men dying 6 years earlier can be…
/r/MensRights13/11/17 01:15 PM
1

Archive'd link original post
/r/MensRights13/11/17 01:05 PM
2

Eggplanticist!
/r/MensRights13/11/17 12:43 PM
2

It would be cool if some real quotes were added.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 12:41 PM
1

Do you have read RBOMI?
/r/MensRights08/11/17 02:27 PM
1

Here is a GirlWritesWhat's video about benevolent sexism.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 02:19 PM
1

This is a most "radical" stance of Libertarianism. There are some varieties of it accepting some state intervention. Milton Friedman believed in some system of "negative taxes" for the poorest, and the theories of John Rawls wouldn't overrule social politics as a whole.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 01:02 PM
3

This is a competition only because feminists frame it this way. Yes, it is fine to fight for women's rights. But, why it is silly to fight for men's rights? Why men's rights movements are always treated as hate groups, but feminist groups can write "satirical" pieces about killing all men, negating them franchise, negating them due process rights and even normalize man hating, without being labeled hate groups?
/r/MensRights30/10/17 08:34 PM
2

"Yes, we need feminism because girls and women are suffering in this world." "Boys and men are suffering? You are lying and you hate women!"
/r/MensRights30/10/17 08:31 PM
3

It remembers me the old post about disenfranchising white males from HuffPost: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/446811/huffpo-fell-hoax-piece-demanding-white-men-lose-voting-rights
/r/MensRights30/10/17 07:49 PM
1

Any details? Links, papers and the like?
/r/MensRights26/10/17 08:01 PM
2

Be happy!
/r/MensRights26/10/17 03:28 PM
1

I prefer a more recent one!
/r/MensRights26/10/17 03:19 PM
1

If someone needs to read the deleted article, here is an archived version...
/r/MensRights20/10/17 07:40 PM
18

Basically a "feminist lens" to some men's issues.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 07:32 PM
7

Technically, she started as a feminist not so aware about MRAs.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 07:31 PM
2

I would point out legal inequalities and some outcomes: the prison gender gap, child custody gender gap...
/r/MensRights18/10/17 03:54 PM
40

#NicoleRapedMe
/r/MensRights18/10/17 03:00 PM
1

A long time ago, more than 2 years, another feminist woman also entered that subreddit with a similar motto. Well, in that sub I think there are many men worse off than mine. I don't have great personal experiences to share, as the ones who lost their children to draconian family court settlements. My involvement is a more "empathical" one. I don't remember the exact point when I became aware of men's issues, but the main concern driving me today is equality, and more narrowly equality before la…
/r/MensRights17/10/17 05:49 PM
3

Pro life Pro life isn't a exclusively Christian or religious teaching. Hey, there are secularists, Democrats and even Feminists for life! In fact a whole bunch of suffragettes were involved in pro-life movements because they believed it is the ultimate exploitation of women (something even pro-choice, Marxist radfem Cath. MacKinnon acknowledges). Now, well... back to the normal programming!
/r/MensRights17/10/17 03:00 PM
4

In fact, the most important issue of them all, in my humble opinion, is fatherlessness. It dispoportionately affects black people, and it would be a huge area of intersection between both black people's rights and men's rights issues.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 04:14 PM
3

Internalized racism, much?
/r/MensRights09/10/17 08:38 PM
6

It reads: After months at a shitty job I finally get one that seems awesome 4 weeks in and I get accused of rape by a female member of my team
/r/MensRights05/10/17 05:40 PM
1

Good bot
/r/MensRights20/09/17 03:06 PM
2

On mental illness grounds?
/r/MensRights18/09/17 07:10 PM
2

i've found this, too: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/245/366/case.html
/r/MensRights18/09/17 06:52 PM
1

I am a native Brazilian Portuguese speaker. The oldest meaning of that term is "male pride" or "male characteristic". Today, as a stolen term from feminism, is just "anti-female and pro-male sexism". But it isn't the same as "misogyny"; "machismo" is treated as a pervasive thing as "women aren't good at math", not as a conscious thing as "kill all men". But whatever, that terms are just emotional triggers in discussions.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 02:17 PM
2

I think it doesn't survive a Socratic or even a Dialetical approach. If everything has negative side effects, then everything comprises privileges and burdens. So, the term "male privilege" is useless. Or she needs to recognize females have privileges too. Being treated like a child is a privilege, because children aren't held accountable about their errors, but it has also a burden, not to be treated seriously. Everything in her post can be "swapped" in order to show how males are deprived of p…
/r/MensRights11/09/17 02:14 PM
2

Hey, come on! Feminist theories can't possibly predict absolutely nothing. Boko Haram is the most glaring example. By defining "patriarchy" as "men holding power and women excluded from it", it is just looking at the visible power. There are another instances of power, some of them not requiring outstanding appearance. As GWW said in one of their YT videos, Barack Obama said he regularly consulted his wife about every important thing in the White House. If he was the "most powerful man on earth"…
/r/MensRights06/09/17 09:06 PM
2

1 - Yes, I really appreciate all the support of FeMRAs. 1.1 - Invariably, the main area I am interested is the legal/juridical argumentation, and a bit of History. I have learned more about History reading and listening Karen Straughan than in any other sources about the subjects she regularly speaks out. 2 - Men's rights are an issue for any human being. After all, everyone has at least a mother and a father, even if they aren't physically present. 3 - I don't think it can be a hindrance for me…
/r/MensRights05/09/17 08:46 PM
1

Here in Brazil, until 2015, the law allowed the premature ending of a criminal prosecution of rape in case of a marriage. About male rape implying child support, nothing was judged as far as I know. But there are some bizarre judicial decisions, in the same vein as "lying about using contraceptives", "not the true father" and even a case of "double child support"...
/r/MensRights05/09/17 03:05 PM
1

A juridical commentary about some laws: https://np.reddit.com/r/prolife/comments/6x8gxv/_/dmfbwdx/
/r/MensRights01/09/17 09:25 PM
5

According to some crazy nut judges and lawyers, the embryos can have rights, but not "life inside a woman" (because Roe's judge-made laws). It is a bit strange indeed!
/r/MensRights01/09/17 09:24 PM
1

But ant-ifas can only be implemented after the 2nd generation, short after the Naz-ants.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 01:12 PM
7

I really don't know. She just started some conversations with antifems and took some divisive issues. like the gender question.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 04:50 PM
1

Best link on the subject: https://www.avoiceformen.com/education/quiz-suffagists-ku-klux-klan-or-feminazis-part-1/
/r/MensRights28/08/17 12:13 AM
6

Conflating per capita injuries with overall injuries. Silly as fuck.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 08:05 PM
2

He had some articles about MRA-related things. But he is/was ancap before that, in fact he understands men's issues as a part of his ancap worldwiew.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 12:17 AM
1

David Fatrelle. Nuff said. And please, OP: archive this shit!
/r/MensRights19/08/17 12:12 AM
1

I am a bit curious about a thing now: it breaks the Equal Protection Clause?
/r/MensRights14/08/17 05:39 PM
1

http://slatestarcodex.com/2017/08/07/contra-grant-on-exaggerated-differences/?fref=gc
/r/MensRights13/08/17 06:57 PM
1

Is failing.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 06:03 PM
1

She said women were treated as slaves, but as far as I know if the husband was a wife-beater then he was the one to be flogged in a post...
/r/MensRights06/08/17 05:58 PM
1

It is hard to translate my particular tone of sarcasm, but it was my try. Now I am waiting the approval. First, it isn't the case woman didn't have property rights. It is just half, or better, one-third of the history. As yourself admitted, it was about mutual obligations (a thing feminists aren't so fond of, right?). The woman relinquished her property rights iny no behalf of the husband, and as counterpart the husband was made accountable for everything she needed, from food and shelter and sh…
/r/MensRights05/08/17 05:56 PM
1

I understand your point: you think that forced conscription is immoral. And I can't disagree with you here, because it is my particular position too. But I don't think the arguments for forced conscription are silly, I just think they are wrong. There are sane people who defend it, including some forced-conscripted veterans. Citing Rousseau a bit, serving the Military is a citizenship obligation. In fact that argument was employed by the SCOTUS a long time ago, and in many countries the citizens…
/r/MensRights04/08/17 07:37 PM
2

I can cite some indirect cause-effect link. First, there is an old link here on our subreddit about the mob-lynching on (unproved) rape accusations: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/28zs7c/a_criminologist_explains_90_of_black_men_falsely/?st=j5y7aqda&sh=06951320 http://www.businessinsider.com/florida-apologizes-to-4-black-men-falsely-accused-of-rape-in-1949-2017-4 And also some suffragettes bought the black male violence, at least Rebecca Felton: https://www.avoiceformen.com/educatio…
/r/MensRights04/08/17 06:38 PM
1

I can just copy-paste a whole lot of articles and reddit responses of Karen Straughan. In fact I will do it at noon!
/r/MensRights04/08/17 06:16 PM
1

This is the part I hate the libertarians. They just pervert the entire arguments just to adjust their own views about, huh, freeedom. The entire question of female forced conscription is an equality concern, not a freedom one. When Senator McCain says that women have open doors to military, it is cointrasting it with the fact the men and boys have a closed handcuffs to military, and it will not change any time soon.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 04:00 PM
2

This is a gap feminists don't want to close.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 03:43 PM
4

No way - the rape hysteria was in the first wave too! It just acquired a more anti-male (and not only anti-black) contour in the next waves.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 03:26 PM
1

What about the ones who promulgated VAWA laws around the world?
/r/MensRights02/08/17 08:47 PM
1

Please, we need more of it! Can we add more cases to it?
/r/MensRights02/08/17 08:41 PM
2

How they explain so many fujoshi girls avid for yaoi in manga hentai?
/r/MensRights02/08/17 02:45 PM
1

IlluminaDick?
/r/MensRights02/08/17 02:07 PM
1

I think it is mostly a rhetorical and mental weapon. First, victim-blaming has a dubious interpretation: we are blaming the victim because (s)he is negligent and is facilitating the attacker's action, but the mental image is we are blaming the victim as if he is the efficient cause of his own misfortune. Needing to explain the difference of these two things is boring... The second is: it treats men as rapey-machines, animals with an uncontrollable willingness to rape any hole in anything from ob…
/r/MensRights30/07/17 03:49 PM
3

As far as I know, the Jewish circumcision doesn't rip off 50% of the penian skin, just a tiny slit on the tip. Even because today it is made in a cirurgical setting, and the old Israelites didn't have so good doctors like today's ones.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 07:23 PM
7

Respect +9000
/r/MensRights26/07/17 12:56 AM
-1

TERFs, anyone?
/r/MensRights21/07/17 05:01 PM
1

As always, there is some Fact Check about their numbers out there? Mainly the Rwandan ciphers and laws...
/r/MensRights21/07/17 04:58 PM
1

negligence by the current prison system, the fact that prisoners have committed past crimes already so they have a higher probability of raping others in general, and many prisoners will never leave said prisons as they have life sentences. Not a single line of what you said here softens the situation of men. Quite the opposite, it shows clearly the complete lack of awareness from the public authorities to the issue of male victims of rape.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 07:54 PM
2

I don't remember so much things about my road on human rights issues. I am more aligned with STEM, specifically Computer Science. MY tortuous route, randomly following links about male issues in a series of blogs drove me to the Brazilian spinoff of A Voice For Men. From that I become more involved on it, commenting these issues (on Facebook primarily), becoming aware of the damn lies of feminist apologists, and posting some translation work on my personal blogs. Now my primary motivation to fig…
/r/MensRights17/07/17 09:11 PM
3

You are using the Classical label of liberal, not the left-regressive appopriation. But yes, even Rubin recognizes the left isn't progressive anymore.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 03:57 PM
2

MHRAConnect can accept foreign, non-USA projects?
/r/MensRights11/07/17 03:53 PM
1

There already exists some subtitles in English, downloadable from Internet. In fact I am using one in order to translate it to my mother tongue, Brazilian Portuguese, and it is not so hard to translate at all. How about to write a translation yourself?
/r/MensRights10/07/17 01:12 AM
2

You can use Markdown: 1 - Inside square brackets, write "reddit!" [reddit!] 2 - Write the hyperlink inside parentheses: (https://reddit.com) 3 - Join both, nothing between: [reddit!].(https://reddit.com) (eliminate the dot between ] and () 4 - Be happy: reddit!
/r/MensRights07/07/17 07:32 PM
4

From /r/Economics https://www.reddit.com/r/Economics/wiki/faq_genderwagegap
/r/MensRights05/07/17 02:45 PM
2

百パーセント - One Hundred Percent!
/r/MensRights05/07/17 01:42 PM
2

He is my primary inspiration to become an attorney here in my country - before I get a retirement in Poland, of course!
/r/MensRights04/07/17 02:02 PM
1

If you note, some pages are very degraded.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 01:50 PM
2

Google Chrome can print a page as PDF. I think we can use it!
/r/MensRights04/07/17 09:21 AM
1

After a fucking month, it still bothers me. I can accept your objections about the question of slavery and ritual mutilation - I think you are talking about circumcision here, but whatever. They are the hardest positions to digest and even defend. (An acquaintance of mine explained a bit about the ancient history of the Hebrew people, it helped me understanding such parts; he even posted about it in her personal news blog.) Nevertheless, about the "forced marriage after rape" thing, I would obje…
/r/MensRights29/06/17 08:45 PM
3

http://archive.fo/ipdiU http://archive.fo/H2xIg http://archive.fo/7FR7C Just in case...
/r/MensRights29/06/17 03:40 PM
1

Dean Esmay made an article about To Kill a Mockingbird and men's rights: https://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/to-kill-a-mockingbird-all-men-are-tom-robinson-now/
/r/MensRights29/06/17 01:44 PM
4

It is hard to select a best scene on that movie. Many of them are strongly interconnected; exempli gratia the scene Fred Hayward playing acoustic guitar gains a completely different (and sad, and terrifying) meaning when surrounded by his whole history. But I would select two scenes, both by Straughan, and relatively independent of the whole movie: that one, when she says "We're not blaming men, we're just naming everything bad after them"; and when she says "If those girls were boys, they would…
/r/MensRights29/06/17 01:33 PM
2

This will be necessary! But our offspring subs aren't so active...
/r/MensRights27/06/17 03:53 PM
1

All the posts are about a 3-year-old AMA post...
/r/MensRights27/06/17 12:55 PM
2

It just becomes worse later: the main decision today for abortion rights, namely Casey v. PP say explicitly that the father has absolutely no say about the destiny of the blob of cells inside the mother. On the other hand, Hermesmann v. Seyer in Kansas says the man is liable to child support even in case of female-against-male rape. "... [The] state's interest in ensuring that a minor receives child support outweighed its interest in potentially deterring sexual crimes against minors...". The sy…
/r/MensRights27/06/17 12:53 PM
2

Just a metaphor. As far as I know, the tradition dictates you can see the bride only at the wedding altar, and the veil is sufficiently thick in order to not distinguish her face's details, but only a penumbra.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 06:32 PM
28

It is an exercise on "change the genders". In a marriage, often the male commits to love, protect and provide the female. And the marriage is called "patriarchal male privilege and power above women". But, reversing the genders, what if the woman was the one bound to the commitment to provide the man, with all implications following it (more labor-related sickness and accidents &c)? It would be considered "female privilege"?
/r/MensRights26/06/17 06:13 PM
6

Pick-Up Artists. I don't know so much about them, but I can resume as men who employ some tactics to seduce women and get laid, You can find something about it at Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seduction_community
/r/MensRights26/06/17 05:13 PM
1

P.S.: can I translate it to Portuguese?
/r/MensRights24/06/17 06:28 PM
2

I liked it very much! Maybe your teachers think it would be helpful top women as a kind of "internal discussion work". Your work can be utilized to a, say, "libertarian" or "NAFALT" feminist talking about the issues of the "not real feminists".
/r/MensRights23/06/17 02:47 PM
1

Oh man, I am very bad making jokes in a foreign tongue... But, questioning a bit more, I don't think my joke is so off the tracks after all. I usually stretch analogies in order to point inconsistencies, and, seriously, even discounting all the boring discussions about human rights for clumps of cells, it is hard to swallow the "abort is equivalent to legspreading".
/r/MensRights23/06/17 01:41 AM
2

Priceless! Maybe with some sources and pictures it would be even more interesting...
/r/MensRights22/06/17 02:18 PM
1

If you are just saying "person" in a legal positivistic way, it is a sterile discussion. Positivistically, "person" is just what the law say it is. There are countries on Europe where dolphins are elevated to the status of non-human people; and, citing a banal argument, blacks were "75% people" before some ammendments in US laws...
/r/MensRights22/06/17 02:11 PM
1

No, it isn't. Manspreading has absolutely no potential to put a woman in child support.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 02:00 PM
3

Oh man! Even to kill someone a man needs to risk his own life, meanwhile a woman can even demand from government a safe way to kill annoying "blobs of cells"!
/r/MensRights22/06/17 01:58 PM
-3

Disregarding all the fucking debate about the specific point in the time the corresponding neural structures are present, abortion is considered a right in the USA; it is completely possible to legally kill a "conscious" fetus (whatever it means).
/r/MensRights22/06/17 01:55 PM
10

Pseudoscience, in the best of interpretations.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 01:49 PM
7

The thing most irritating to me is: the fucking thing men are worse in every clipping they cite. Gay/Lesbian rights? Almost every country with anti-homosexuality laws has harsher laws for male gays than for lesbians. But "it isn't a gendered issue!"... Genital mutilation? For women it is banned on Western societies, and the single proposal of it is treated as gross misogyny. For men, it is considered "a good thing in behalf of girls"!
/r/MensRights21/06/17 08:56 PM
1

Unhappily, they are all in Brazilian Portuguese. Maybe Google Translate can be useful to translate them, but if yiu need anything, don't hesitate to ask! http://g1.globo.com/goias/noticia/mpf-investiga-expulsao-de-professora-antifeminista-de-evento-na-ufg.ghtml http://g1.globo.com/goias/noticia/alunos-da-ufg-se-revoltam-durante-palestra-com-professora-que-critica-o-feminismo-video.ghtml http://www.jornalopcao.com.br/ultimas-noticias/coletivo-defende-protestos-e-diz-que-fala-de-thais-azevedo-e-no…
/r/MensRights21/06/17 06:50 PM
2

Recently here in Brazil, a gang of loud feminists expelled a female anti-feminist speaker from the federal public university in Goiânia.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 02:19 PM
1

But the Courts, specially the SCOTUS, can choose how to "fix the law" until Congress doesn't decide what to do. In a certain sense, they have two options, both compatible to Constitution: or use the most lenient rule or the most hard one. And they preferred the worse one. And yes, the Congress can amend the law to fix a different rule, with the obvious fix for equality. Until there, SCOTUS has settled its position. I think the Congress will not say anything, after all the current POTUS is pushin…
/r/MensRights17/06/17 04:06 PM
1

But it doesn't help fathers/men, in fact it worsens the situation for mothers.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 04:03 AM
1

I can talk about some things in my country: First, our definition of rape is as large as the Amazon River: every lustful act can be framed as rape, from catching the boobs or "grab her by the pussy" to penetration, is framed as rape. By the other side, our Courts established that the spoken statements made by the "victim" are probative element: In crimes of sexual nature, the offended's wording, given the clandestine nature of the offense, is of paramount importance, if not the only evidence ava…
/r/MensRights13/06/17 04:31 PM
4

http://archive.is/kf3y2
/r/MensRights12/06/17 08:30 PM
7

It is more like inter-racial relationships before the ending of Jim Crow Laws...
/r/MensRights08/06/17 07:07 PM
4

actually the result of misogyny - or pa-pa-patriarchy!
/r/MensRights06/06/17 07:39 PM
1

Not at all. Pushing the analogy, in feminism, men are statically locked as demons and women are statically locked as angels.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 07:19 PM
3

I think there are some crucial differences, but the religious framework is the same. http://www.sciencevsfeminism.com/the-myth-of-oppression/feminism/
/r/MensRights03/06/17 01:53 AM
2

It has text messages too! I will test it now.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 01:00 AM
5

I need a laugh button right now!
/r/MensRights02/06/17 08:34 PM
3

A VOIP server - a type of huge chat room. Originally made for gamers.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 02:49 PM
1

Well, I know him more from the Fast and Furious series.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 02:41 PM
2

In the movie The Red Pill, Cassie Jaye explains a bit about the "Bash a Violent Bitch Month" [1] [2]. It was a satirical response ("confrontational rather than peaceful because inciting rage is the best way to get people to pay attention", as you have said) to the Jezebel's article joking about boyfriend-battering. Strangely, Katherine Spillar says "domestic violence is codeword for wife-beating". Silly. 1 - https://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/domestic-violence-industry/october-is-the-fifth…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/17 07:02 PM
1

This would be in direct contradiction to "exact same work", even if we treat it as a mere perception/expectation.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 04:15 PM
1

The anti-newleft in Brazil have made something in that direction. We liberally use the word "opressor" in an ironical setting.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 07:07 PM
1

It could be "absorbed", at least as a parody argument, right? We can point that men have their own oppressions and standpoints to argue, and it wouldn't be hard to recognize.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 06:20 PM
3

I would ask a single question: "If women are strictly less paid to execute the exact same work as a man, why an employer would choose more expensive men?"
/r/MensRights31/05/17 06:12 PM
1

Hey, that's almost ten years of delaying! That was a plot of a Brazilian soap opera, Duas Caras ("Two Faces"), running 2007 to 2008. Resuming it a bit, an unscrupulous man deluded a young woman to marry him and take all her fortune. He used that fortune to create a new identity, perform a plastic surgery (hence the name), and become a successful enterpreneur from Construction business. And, in order to avoid gold-digging, spent some money in vasectomy. Some time later, I have searched the laws o…
/r/MensRights29/05/17 09:56 PM
3

We don't have a huge record on these issues, but I remember one good thing: Woods v. Horton. In that landmark case, Marc Angelucci and Men's Legal Center argued that gender-based discrimination in statutes that provide programs for victims of domestic violence are unconstitutional, and violate the Equal Protection principle. And Marc tells some snippets of that history in the documentary The Red Pill: a friend of him married to an abusive spouse couldn't find a single shelter for him and his chi…
/r/MensRights29/05/17 07:54 PM
1

I was drunk (not drinked) that day.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 03:08 PM
1

"Irony" has many meanings. I think the OP is talking about the famous "ironies of life", when two seemingly opposite things collide. It is a movie mainly focused in men's issues, but it won a prize/award focused in women.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 01:58 AM
1

Oh, man! I think the app was for all the world, but it was only for Brazil! Unhappily there are only news in Brazilian Portuguese [1] [2], but I can resume it a bit here: In a promotional action for the 5th season of GoT, HBO Brazil launched an app simulating the Night Watchers' scenario. But the app was blocked for women, with a message "Sorry ladies, you aren't allowed in the Night Watch". 1 - http://archive.is/ZLVHQ 2 - http://archive.is/4ZeLj
/r/MensRights26/05/17 08:42 PM
2

get beat up for talking to white women, In fact, the rape culture hysteria victimed mostly black men in the post-slavery times... Just because society is going through a phrase of a sentiment of anti-men attitudes doesn't mean you're oppressed. Every stance of "women-hating attitude" is explicithy used by feminists as a staunch proof of oppression. any time in recent history where men were legally subservient for being a man/male Male-only draft, with the corresponding voting restrictions. Also,…
/r/MensRights26/05/17 12:01 PM
1

There is a version of it made in a big poster. Can someone find that? I wanna translate to my mother tongue...
/r/MensRights26/05/17 11:41 AM
1

I remember about a smartphone game of the Game Of Thrones franchise, simulating the watchers on the walls, and the feminist outrage because the game weren't allowed for women to play. But "boys are offended because women have advantage once in life, hooray!".
/r/MensRights26/05/17 11:38 AM
2

First, I am taking it from an 'agnostic' stance, not a Christian one. Second, arguments as "have you ever read the Bible?" are so stupid as "Have you ever read the Constitution?" (And, in the same tone, arguments as "those people endorsed slavery, mutilation and forced marriage..." are equally as stupid as saying "those American people endorsed Dred Scott, Jim Crow, Slaughter Houses, Korematsu" ...)
/r/MensRights24/05/17 03:08 AM
1

According to Cambridge Dict (http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english-portuguese/propaganda): Propaganda: information, ideas, opinions, or images, often only giving one part of an argument, that are broadcast, published, or in some other way spread with the intention of influencing people’s opinions There is another meaning for propaganda you are using? If it is the case, please explain.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 12:56 AM
2

My ten cents here: If the Christian deity is a real thing or not, it doesn't matter in a superficial look. I can argue that a "Christian view of ethics" (whatever it may be) can't be reconciled with a "right to abortion", regardless of that. But I will not provide any proof that the Christian god disagrees with him - it is very far from the purpose of that sub, anyway.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 08:00 PM
2

https://quiensebeneficiadetuhombria.files.wordpress.com/2017/03/circumcision-propaganda-poster-2-uganda.jpg Is this a propaganda?
/r/MensRights23/05/17 07:55 PM
4

> Christian > Abortion provider Choose only one, motherfucker.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 06:32 PM
1

I think the root of all male issues, if I can be so categorical about it, is the lack of empathy towards boys and men, and (almost) everything resembling that, from scientifical discoveries to violent sports as pugilism (or even soccer, for that matter).
/r/MensRights22/05/17 09:14 PM
4

For those more libertarian - or mini-state- inclined, there is that study from John R. Lott Jr. and Lawrence W. Kenny, "Did Women’s Suffrage Change the Size and Scope of Government?". They argue that the American Government became more and more corpulent and obese with women's suffrage. http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~iversen/PDFfiles/LottKenny.pdf
/r/MensRights21/05/17 10:15 PM
2

Archive.is'd: http://archive.is/SmfII
/r/MensRights19/05/17 09:31 PM
4

Use ceddit as client. I have pushed a more recent version here: http://archive.is/up1Gl http://archive.is/OLFDe
/r/MensRights18/05/17 05:09 PM
30

Some things: 1 - I have seen it initially in another subreddit about pro-life issues; 2 - Yes, I am pro-life, and I am aware about how the MRM hasn't a specific instance on the moral/legal question of it. Anyway, my question is about the social/psychological role of a father in that type of situation. Resuming a bit her story, the girl says that her boyfriend didn't show the least bit of concern about her doing an abortion; after that, he becomes more and more emotionally detached and more and m…
/r/MensRights18/05/17 03:09 AM
2

Here in Brazil it isn't so uncommon. Some SJW pages are outright hate-filled, even the most left-leaning Facebook censor can't act other way. On the other hand, anti-SJW pages are regularly removed or blocked by almost no reason. The page "Moça, não sou obrigada a ser feminista" (Lady, I'm not required to be feminist) was removed 3 times, and "Aventuras na Justiça Social" (Social Justice Adventures - a reference to the animated series Adventure Time) was forever banned (after 2 bans, they prefer…
/r/MensRights12/05/17 02:40 PM
2

Can we add Brazilian links? Brazilian A Voice For Men: http://br.avoiceformen.com Lado Direito da Equidade (The Right Side of Equality): http://7uvw.xyz/ladodireitodaequidade -> more a type of blog containing various snippets of news and articles about men's news
/r/MensRights11/05/17 06:50 PM
4

Please, someone make a backup of it to the prosperity! It will be the 21th Century's Mein Kampf (yea, full Godwin here)!
/r/MensRights10/05/17 09:26 PM
1

It is a joke, but "just" isn't the best word to it.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 04:10 PM
2

so even a man who is a victim to honor related violence should be protected. What special extra protection do women get now? I can talk a bit about the laws in my country about domestic violence. We are not in so good grounds as you in America: we don't have a serious federalistic system. Most of laws are decided by a centralized government, away from the local needs. Only some more administrative things are left to the states and local legislatures. Here we have a version of VAWA, widely known …
/r/MensRights08/05/17 04:08 PM
14

Welcome aboard! Well, there is a r/femra already there, but it is less crowded! Take a seat, talk about your story!
/r/MensRights08/05/17 05:13 AM
1

Is the Vimeo version subbed/captioned?
/r/MensRights02/05/17 01:33 PM
1

This is just judicial activism in its full glory! And a textbook example of ad hoc decision! What the fuck is happening?
/r/MensRights28/04/17 04:12 PM
7

A brit without milah. A naming ceremony without the genital mutilation :)
/r/MensRights20/04/17 07:55 PM
2

Ancap as fuck!
/r/MensRights20/04/17 07:26 PM
9

There are some reasons. Some suppose that formerly the motivation was to regulate the sexual drive for boys, precluding male masturbation and other things. As the time passed by, the argument changed to "cleaning, hygiene, STD reduction"...
/r/MensRights19/04/17 03:54 PM
1

There is someone barely interest on their movies?
/r/MensRights11/09/16 09:59 PM
3

Court system as a whole.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 04:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter