TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

poffin Archive

View 1 post and 41 comments by poffin on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

poffin/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/13 10:59 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

because if you get it wrong you're opening yourself up to criminal charges. Well, you're also opening yourself up to raping someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/15 06:13 PM
4

You don't think there are any gay men out there who'd love to exchange a roof and a warm bed for sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/15 08:56 PM
0

You are just hurting your odds to much of finding a lover by placing pointless stumbling blocks ahead of yourself. There are many other things Feminism encourages that just make women ugly. Oh, so you're just pissed because you're not attracted to feminists, and you wish all women conformed to what you find attractive. If you didn't why you care there are women out there who you think won't ever find a man?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/14 08:13 PM
-1

No such thing as equal relationships. One side always has the power. It's really sad you believe that. :( Of course I'm sure I couldn't convince you I'm in an equal relationship...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/14 08:09 PM
-1

We reject that claim, and we see results because of it. And people who don't also see results. So I guess we're even?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/14 08:05 PM
1

And how can you determine this on a dating site?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/14 07:33 PM
1

I don't want kids so what is the point? Well, what's the point of anything? Literally everything we experience is a result of evolution. Happiness is just a reaction to evolutionary advantageous behaviors. Sadness and pain is evolution telling you to avoid certain things. Everything is a pointless construction in our heads. We're just analog computers with DNA as our programming and experiences that allow us to add to that programming. But... who cares? Who cares why I get happy when I eat ice c…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/14 07:31 PM
1

If there is a love beyond that, I would like to find it, but I think there's a reason I felt "love" for a girl who was a healthy female of breeding age rather than a person who didn't meet those criteria. Are you suggesting you wouldn't have been in love if she was physically disabled in some way, or was infertile? Or had a genetic illness, or any of the other reasons someone might not birth a healthy baby?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/14 07:18 PM
1

most of us remember the lack of response we get on dating sites, and we're not acting like jackasses. "Not being a jackass" is a really low bar, dude. What you're saying is, if I don't act like an ass when I approach women, they're shallow if they're not into me.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/14 12:30 PM
1

so you're saying that women are just as shallow as men? Can you seriously not grasp that women are varied and some women are shallow and just as many aren't? the trope about women caring about personality is bunk sold to suckers? This is the problem, you're grasping for an overarching rule that doesn't exist. It matters to some women, it doesn't to others. Women looking for a one night stand obviously care about looks and women looking for long term relationships care more about personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/14 12:29 PM
0

Right, but the implication is that it's a majority of women, a large enough number that the other types of women aren't worth mentioning.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/14 08:18 PM
1

because there's a cliche circulating that says that women are more about personality. Have you considered that some women do and some women don't?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/14 07:08 PM
1

Have you considered that men drop other parts of the relationship after 4 years instead of sex? Maybe dead bedroom means dead romance? I mean, without looking at relationships as an ecosystem that involves two people and dozens of aspects I wouldn't put much stock into "marriage sucks for men and only men because women stop putting out"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/14 06:23 PM
2

Ah, I spend very little time in that subreddit, especially not on mobile. I googled the term and nothing but TRP threads came up!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/14 05:55 PM
4

I don't understand the relevance of that, can you elaborate?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/14 03:26 PM
12

The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place. This law assumes the male inherently desires the female, which is why it can get away with suggesting that the female holds all the power. If two people must agree together to do something (have a relationship, have sex, make a family, whatever), and you assume that one party will always say yes, it's really easy to …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/14 01:54 AM
1

I expect civil discussion, not "Women are hypergamous sluts." Oh well.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/14 06:47 PM
3

Yeah, hypergamy is totally a proven concept, like the rest of the evo psych field. Dude, if you can't leave your red pill shit at the door for five minutes you're not gonna have any sort of discussion here. You don't see me coming in here talking about patriarchy and privilege, do you?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/14 06:45 PM
1

Jesus can you not reply directly to me with that shit? I won't bother you if you don't fill my inbox with misogynistic slut shaming. Just because I'm being civil doesn't mean I'll circlejerk with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/14 06:42 PM
2

Ugh. I'm not suggesting hypergamy, and it grosses me out that I inspired such a comment from you. You know you're talking to a woman right? You basically just said to me, "I know what you mean, women are so greedy and shallow. Expect it."
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/14 06:38 PM
2

I think women are raised to be obsessed with marriage. I think they're raised to believe that marriage will make them happy, and being married matters more than who you're married to. It's pretty gross, seeing movies and tv shows where the woman asks herself, "When will I get married??" instead of, "When will I find the right partner for me?" They see their entire future all planned out (two kids, a house, a dog, etc) except for a blank silhouette titled, "Insert husband here." Since tv shows al…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/14 06:28 PM
1

Ugh, that's abusive as fuck. Thank you! I'll add it to my collection of terrible quotes.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/13 06:10 PM
3

I don't know you, and I know your wife even less. My own relationship mirrors yours to some extent. I have social anxiety, and my boyfriend takes pride in "protecting" me by talking to waiters and secretaries. It makes him feel like a provider, and it makes me feel loved and cared for. IMO there's nothing wrong with a traditional relationship as long as both parties are happy. An almost fundamental aspect of RP theory is that women don't know what makes them happy, and that (red pill) men know b…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/13 11:07 PM
2

They're only suggesting that they want to be in a relationship with someone they respect and admire, and who respects and admires them back equally.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/13 10:47 PM
2

He said his partner can only express otherwise 1 hour a week. The other 167 hours (99.4% of the time), his partners can't express criticism. Do you possibly have a link to that?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/13 10:44 PM
3

I'm not saying you are or aren't an abuser, but seriously, that's what all abusers think. They see themselves as great partners. Everything abusers do they do because they "love" their spouse. "Her friends are bad influences, I'm doing what's best for her when I don't allow her to see them." All I'm saying is, that's a terrible defense, and it doesn't change the fact that both setting a maximum weight for your girlfriend and always talking to strangers for her are both really controlling behavio…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/13 10:40 PM
7

"Personally I have set a minimum and maximum weight that [my gf] stays between. She also understands that she needs to eat well (2 meals a day), and exercise. She likes the structure and does this to please me." And "Yup. Walk through every door first, be the only one to speak to every waiter. I'm not a big fan of holding hands. I prefer to grab round their arm and lead." is what makes people think you're an abuser, fyi. This behavior suggests someone who is massively controlling, a sign of an a…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/13 07:46 PM
6

Dude, you just said that about 51% of the human population. Do you think of yourself as sexist? I just can't imagine how you can say something negative about all women and not understand that it's inherently sexist to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/13 02:19 PM
2

Can you prove examples of this please?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/13 07:34 PM
11

What's the point in criticizing her? People admit to mistakes all the time on reddit, it's not really a nice thing to do to rub it in their faces after they've admitted to it. What are we claiming she's not responsible for? He started to get emotional and clung onto me like a leech, and wanted to hold me the whole night. I was panicking, so I told him I had to go outside for a smoke to calm myself down to sleep. If I'd been at his place I would have left, but he was at mine. When I went back ins…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/13 12:25 AM
9

We are creatures of habit. Habits are hard to break. if you have a past sex life of many partners, you won't stop for one partner for a simple reason. A simple google search with show that. But promiscuous men don't cheat when they settle down? Why is it that this rule only applies to women?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/13 08:59 PM
8

I appreciate your response. I'd like to know the justification for that stuff. Why don't you want a woman who is good in bed? Why would someone's past sex life make her bad marriage material, and why doesn't the same apply for men?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/13 08:21 PM
3

But is there a real, logical justification for it? Why would a woman with a high number be a worse partner than a man with a high number?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/13 04:48 PM
9

But that doesn't justify holding that belief yourself. I don't claim to know what you believe, but it's obvious that the majority of RedPillers actively dislike women who like to sleep with different men. I mean, there's a difference between "Promiscuous women have a harder time finding a long time partner because men don't like their sexual habits" and "I think women who sleep around are sluts who don't value themselves." One is an acknowledgment of social values, and the other is a declaration…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/13 04:44 PM
6

Right away the way the question is framed is dishonest. I genuinely didn't mean to! I was kinda referring to how I saw red pillers use the term: [1][2][3] The reason that the "rules" are different for men and women is because we are comparing different things. It is not attractive when women have sex whenever they want because the vast majority of women can have sex whenever they want with men who are just as or even more attractive than them. This could not be farther from the truth for the maj…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/13 06:20 AM
10

Did you tell your fiance that you tried to trigger a rape victim and threaten to rape them?
/r/MensRights08/02/12 02:22 PM
11

He admitted that he believe triggers exist, just that the people being triggered should get over it.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 02:20 PM
5

Here's Julian Assange's lawyer's account of the what happened: The appellant [Assange]'s physical advances were initially welcomed but then it felt awkward since he was "rough and impatient" … They lay down in bed. AA was lying on her back and Assange was on top of her … AA felt that Assange wanted to insert his penis into her vagina directly, which she did not want since he was not wearing a condom … She did not articulate this. Instead she therefore tried to turn her hips and squeeze her legs …
/r/MensRights02/02/12 04:20 PM
2

You've created an inarguable position, because if someone claims to know themselves well enough to know why they dress a certain way then you simply claim that they're lying to themselves. Your position seems to be that because someone is aware of what clothing is communicating to the general population that they should then dress accordingly. They should only dress in a way to communicate their intentions. But isn't the problem itself assuming intentions based upon clothing?
/r/MensRights23/08/11 03:27 AM
2

They may tell themselves its not for attention, but we humans are very good at lying to ourselves. Wait so are you saying that you know women better than they do themselves? I can guarantee you about my intentions when I wear anything. It's because I like the way it looks on me.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 06:46 PM
4

Women want separate environments (whether it be gyms, schools, anything really) because the mixed-gendered environments are not actually female friendly. Women seek out women's gyms because there they face a far lower chance of harassment.
/r/MensRights25/11/10 07:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter