TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

pokepat460 Archive

View 0 posts and 101 comments by pokepat460 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
19

I wouldn't call being in the worst Star Trek film, and only the one, grounds to call her a "Star Trek Actress". Honestly that bothers me more than her stupid opinions.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 06:04 PM
-12

You know, I bet men use heavier weights and more vigourously use the machines, causing more wear on them, and thus cost more as customers. I bet it isn't a 60% difference, but in principle it makes sense to me to charge men more for gym access when they will cause more wear and tear to the machines than women.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 01:36 AM
0

I live in Vegas. Women don't pay to get in clubs or to drink really, but they also have a much stricter standard of appearance if they expect this treatment. Hot women get treated better than other people here, not average women. I don't really think its sexism. The atmosphere that these clubs are trying to go for requires a decent gender ratio, and as a general statement more men go to nightclubs than women, so they need to entice women to come out in greater numbers. I bet if mostly women went…
/r/MensRights20/11/14 06:50 PM
1

Dineen (who prefers to be identified with the pronouns “They, Their, Them”) wrote a bi-weekly column titled “Genderfucked” for the Cornell Daily Sun. Some of her articles include... I lold
/r/MensRights12/10/14 07:58 AM
1

I don't think she should have penalties in the soccer league, what she does that is unrelated to soccer should stay like that. Losing sponsorships and stuff is fine, because that is all voluntary, but this has nothing to do with soccer, so her punishment shouldn't either. Same thing with the NFL penalties; they are rediuclous and have nothing to do with the sports they play.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 01:49 AM
12

Legally, I'm pretty sure you are right. In a practical sense, though, they are different things. If a person forcibly has sex with someone, like the textbook definition of rape, that is a significantly different act than someone being legally raped because they are not old enough to consent to sex. I'm not saying adults fucking minors isn't a problem. It just isn't rape so long as both people are consenting. I know minors can't legally consent, but in a real world sense, ignoring law, it can hap…
/r/MensRights05/09/14 09:31 PM
37

Statutory rape isn't rape. It isn't something that should be ignored, but I dislike the word rape in the name. Its significantly less serious than an actual rape. That said, I don't think gender matters here. An adult woman with a 14 year old boy is as bad/creepy as a 14 year old girl with a 40 year old man. The only difference is that the boy will be told that his experience should have been pleasant or that it wasn't a big deal, whereas the girl would be told they went through trauma and its n…
/r/MensRights05/09/14 09:14 PM
8

"“Posing in your underwear undermines the message that you aim to be taken seriously as a technologist,” said Elissa Shevinsky, CEO of the startup Glimpse Labs" She is a God damned underwear model. She is literally modeling underwear, so posing in her underwear is inhierently required as part of the job. If the line of clothes she was modeling for wasn't underwear, she wouldn't be wearing them.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 06:56 PM
76

I don't get why OP didn't link to the original video and instead linked to someone who uploaded a mirror.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 09:40 PM
1

I don't see how this has anything to do with this subreddit. Its a neat video, but not related to mensrights.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 07:01 PM
2

This gets reposted all the time.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 06:31 PM
1

If he asking questions to bait people into saying something he disagrees with, and then proceed to attack them by refuting what he disagrees with, thats totally fine. If he attacks them like you attacked him, that is not fine. You should probably wait until he attacks someone before you accuse him of just trolling. Disagreeing isn't trolling, it is a necessary part of any discussion.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 05:38 AM
8

Those acronyms make your post hard to read. SAWCSM Straight, Able-bodied, White (Wealthy), Cisgendered, Sexual Male. PoC I'm guessing is People of Color? That doesn't make sense because why would black people even come up in this discussion? Am I mis-interpreting your acronyms? you used so many its difficult to understand the idea you are trying to express.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 04:59 AM
6

If you disagree with him, explain why. Insulting him doesn't help the discussion. ITT, without considering his posts in other threads, he is adding to the discussion by asking why poeple believe what they do.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 04:56 AM
3

The title is misleading in that it implies that no women are ever killed by the state. You could take a small sample of any group and make that group seem very different than they would had you used a representative sample.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 05:31 AM
7

I'm getting a 404 page.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 08:32 PM
2

The 5th of November is a day popular for events that go against the status quo. For example, November 5th is the date of an Anonymouse protest.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 07:06 AM
14

The lack of female bounces probably has more to do with the fact that the job is physically demanding than sexism.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 05:12 AM
46

That they block MRM sites is scummy, but really, who would want to use a feature like that? Like, literally all it does is take away access to websites. Considering you pay for internet access, I just can't understand why anyone other than people who know nothing of technology would ever leave this feature on.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 10:41 PM
3

I think the traffic boost broke the link or the site is down for maintenence. All I get from the link is a page with the text "Some Exciting Changes Are Coming..."
/r/MensRights21/09/13 04:20 AM
-8

"women are dogs" is sexist. "I can use some of the techniques of dog training to better communicate with women, a skill that I have yet to develop due to my having little exposure to women" is not, and the latter is a much better summary of the (reversed gender) book than the former.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 03:45 AM
0

I don't understand what you are trying to say. The parody gender swap you linked to doesn't strike me as sexist.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 03:32 AM
0

To quote myself in response to a similar point, inverting the genders."It would be about a boy with no mother present in his life going from an all boys school to a co-ed school and learning to deal with girls. It wouldn't teach him to be a sissy, but instead how to deal with girls. To me, it seems like you are making a large issue out of next to nothing.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 03:10 AM
3

You misunderstand the book, apparently. The character doesn't go to an all- boy school, so gender inverting it wouldn't be a boy going to an all girls school, nor would it be about teaching him to be a sissy. It would be about a boy with no mother present in his life going from an all boys school to a co-ed school and learning to deal with girls. It wouldn't teach him to be a sissy, but instead how to deal with girls. To me, it seems like you are making a large issue out of next to nothing.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 03:03 AM
-8

This isn't an issue. As AdultNovelty pointed out, it really isn't very sexist, it just has a name that implies that. Plus, even if it were, is this subreddit really devolving to the point of posting the tiniest perceived problem? This dillutes the actual issues down, and posts like this make the MRA movement seem childish and irrelevant.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 01:45 AM
2

The saddest part is that this implies someone that stupid got into UC Berkeley. Those bastards turned me down.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 07:54 PM
4

This isn't the first time this was posted, and she isn't serious. It is a satirical article.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 08:03 PM
-3

Well no shit. It is impressive for a girl to compete with men in football. It is not impressive for a man to compete with women in field hockey. Men are physically stronger then women, so a girl competing with men is impressive, while the reverse is not.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 08:52 AM
4

This is either satire or a very hopeless author.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 10:27 PM
1

The porn addiction one isn't a mens issue. Those statistics gender neutral.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 06:54 AM
3

This is not something that should be posted here. This suits SRS better.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 05:36 AM
1

I don't really understand what the big deal is here. Some guys do look really strange/worse with a mustache. I get the guy went a little far with the insults, but thats extremely common on the interwebs, is it not? Why pay any attention to him?
/r/MensRights20/11/12 09:30 AM
1

I think it is incorrect to say men don't express themselves. Some men do, and many of those men do so for poor reasons, but not all men.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 09:19 AM
3

I don't understand why anyone would take graduate level gender study courses at all, regardless of their gender. Really, other then credit requirements, it seems extremely useless to me.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 09:17 AM
6

This is a terribly written article that has nothing to do with MR.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 07:12 PM
0

I don't know if I think there should be an age of consent at all. I know there needs to be one because there is no way a , say, 4year old would know what consenting even means. But at 15 it is a reasonable assumption to say the kid knew what he was getting into, if not the ramifications of doing it. My main point is that consent matter more then age.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 07:53 AM
-4

The fact that the boys went out of their way to meet up with her, it seems as though it was consensual. If that is the case, she did nothing wrong. Well, maybe not nothing wrong, but nothing so wrong it should be a crime. I should also note that the genders have nothing to do wih my opinion. If a married man had sex with a 15 year old girl and her 17 year old sister, it would be okay with me so long as both the girls consented.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 02:48 AM
3

Well, considering you are one of the mods it will come down to your decision if they try to dox you whether or not to close the subreddit. I implore you not to. Stand up for what you believe in and resist these bigots.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 09:49 PM
4

I don't understand. Don't you have to have somthing to fear your name being associated with to have doxxing matter? Why would the mod at creepshots care if he is doxxed? Is that subreddit illegal? And why would the r/mensrights mods care? There is for sure nothing wrong aobut this subreddit.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 09:38 PM
2

If someone smokes weed, they broke the law but did nothing wrong. Similarly, this woman broke the law and did nothing wrong. The law is what is wrong in this case.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 12:10 AM
1

How does it not matter that the relationship was consensual and reciprocal? That matters very much, to the point where what the woman did was not wrong.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 08:37 PM
2

How about protecting girls from men who are still somewhat attracted to them?
/r/MensRights09/10/12 07:00 AM
2

The question has been deleted. Did anyone screenshot it or copy the text?
/r/MensRights09/10/12 06:40 AM
3

Follow up question: I'm almost positive the answer to OP's question is no. There are other options to avoid paternity, such as adoption. But if a man is raped, can he relinquish paternity of the child? As in, not be responsible for it, have to pay for it, ect.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 06:38 AM
2

I think you misunderstand this billboard, OP.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 06:36 AM
1

Legality=/=morality. The woman did nothing wrong. It was a reciprocal, consensual relationship. She broke the law, but did nothing wrong.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 06:34 AM
2

It isn't like they only took away PE from boys. How is this a gender related issue?
/r/MensRights09/10/12 06:30 AM
4

don't allow women 22-30 to teach high-school. That is INCREDIBLY sexist. How are men more qualified to teach high school then women? This position makes no sense at all.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 06:29 AM
3

It was a consensual, reciprocal relationship, which may have influenced the decision of punishment. Or at least I hope it did, as it should.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 06:28 AM
-2

She shouldn't be. She did not rape the boy. The only reason it is an issue is because he was a few years too young in the eyes of the law. The relationship was reciprocal and consensual. The woman did nothing to warrant being a sex offender.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 06:27 AM
2

They were a couple. The two even left the courtroom together. While I agree it is bad that men are treated worse in cases like this, the woman in this article did nothing wrong, and I am glad to see she was not punished much.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 06:25 AM
2

The title should be "Women were the perpetrators in more than 70% of non-reciprocal domestic violence cases." As it is, it is inaccurate.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 06:21 AM
4

I'm torn on this issue. On one hand, I support equality and support treating transgendered people as the gender they identify with. Honestly I find it pretty wierd, but I respect them and think it is disrespectful to treat them as their biological gender if they don't identify with it. On the other hand, I can totally understand why the girls would be uncomfortable. While Colleen identifies as a woman, those girls probably disagree. Plus, allowing transgender people into the locker room of the g…
/r/MensRights09/10/12 05:13 AM
1

Okay, fine, its discrimination. Then I would argue that some cases of discrimination are totally acceptable. Like this one.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 12:00 AM
1

I know that it is illegal as discrimination, but I disagree that this is discrimination. It isn't that men arent' allowed to go the the gym, or that they have to pay extra money to do so, just that women get a discount.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 05:40 PM
1

Those are all terrible scenarios. The problem is that is that those all could happen. That implies that also could not happen. If those bad thing don't happen, as they sometimes don't, then why create a problem about it? Those could have's are what should be crimes; extortion intimidation into sex, ect. Those are specific cases, no reason the general case is bad.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 03:23 AM
1

Can someone explain to me like I'm 5 how this infringes on mens' rights? It seems to me like its just a cool perk for women. Men are still allowed to go to the gym.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 08:23 PM
1

I'm aware. I'm saying those laws are stupid.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 08:19 PM
1

Yes, I think a store should be able to charge blacks twice what they charge whites if they chose to. I don't understand why that would be a problem. It is a private business, so if black people don't like that they are charged more, they can go elsewhere. Similarly, if men don't like that women get into the gym for cheaper, they can go to a different gym.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 08:18 PM
2

The article didn't mention that it was non-consensual. That would be a very important detail, so I assume the lack of any mention of consent in the article implies that it was consensual. He was over the age of consent. I don't understand how her being in a position of power matters. Explain to me like I'm 5 why it matters that she had power over him in a consensual sexual relation?
/r/MensRights04/10/12 08:16 PM
1

Perhaps, but to the point that she has to quit her job?
/r/MensRights04/10/12 08:12 PM
1

I think that is stupid. Private institutions should be able to serve, or not serve, whoever they want. It is only not okay for government to do that.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 10:11 AM
-2

Why would this be illegal? A private institution should be able to charge whatever they want for their services. If they want to charge women less, they should be allowed to. Men can also join the gym and pay what the gym wants to charge them. If the men don't like the price or object to the difference in prices, they can go to a different gym. This doesn't infringe on mens' rights, its just a cool thing for women. This is just whining.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 10:08 AM
3

Wtf does an anti-rape protest intend to accomplish, exactly? Rape is already a crime, and I doubt rapists care about what they think about rape. Maybe spreading awareness? I think mos tpeople are aware of rape. this makes no sense to me.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 10:06 AM
0

Lol well fuck you too. You gave examples I didn't understand, so I questioned how they were related. I ask for an elaboration of your opinion and you just assume I'm trolling because I don't agree with you.I still don't, and simply stopping the discussion because I don't agree is a terrible way to ago about convincing others that your opinion is correct. I actually want to understand how you go from the examples you provided to the conclusions you drew. I explained why I don't see how you came t…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 09:54 AM
2

Get back to me when you wake up, please. I want to understand your side of the argument.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 09:43 AM
2

I don't see how any of those problems stem from teachers having consensual sex with students of legal age to do so. Ask the male teachers who cannot be alone in a room with a female student without leaving a door open and who are faced daily with people that distrust them how they feel about other teachers claiming to have consensual relationships with their students. I don't know what you are talking about. I've never heard of a teacher of either gender being required to open the door if alone …
/r/MensRights04/10/12 09:42 AM
0

How is a bribed judge or color of law abuses related to consensual sex between a teacher and student? I can see how bribing judges undermine society, but not color of law abuses nor sex between a person in power over the other. So I'll give you corrupt public figures undermine society, but explain how color of law abuses and sex between a person in power over the other do in detail please. And I don't think this is a color of law abuse, in case that is what you are implying. the student was of l…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 09:35 AM
1

Ok, I get that it is a crime. I'm arguing that it shouldn't be a crime. It being a crime doesn't mean it undermines society. How do you go from "its a crime" to "it undermines society"? Do all crimes undermine society? I don't see how it is automatically non-consensual if it involves a person in power over the other. It could sometimes be, and those time should be crimes, but in cases like this one, where both parties consented, I don't see how it is bad. I understand it is illegal, but not why …
/r/MensRights04/10/12 09:24 AM
0

How is this related to mens' rights?
/r/MensRights04/10/12 09:19 AM
-1

There is a significant difference between a teacher and student having consensual sex, and the teacher using her position of power to coerce students into sex. I'm not arguing that the latter is okay, but the former is. However, we cannot control our teachers from sexually preying on your kids. I still don't see how what this woman did was preying on the student. please elaborate, keeping in mind that the sex was consensual. You're responsible for that kid up until 18, or 21, or whatever dependi…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 09:07 AM
3

He was over the age of consent in Arkansas, where this took place, which is 16. And the teacher did not prey on the student. The student consented, multiple times, going so far as to go to the teacher's house. Apart from that, people in authority, that is teachers, should never have sexual relationships with students. That undermines all of society. How does that undermine society?
/r/MensRights04/10/12 08:57 AM
5

OK I can see that, but this is obviously not over the sex in public part.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 08:28 AM
11

If it was consensual I don't see the problem. The fact that it occurred at her house one of the times seems like evidence that it was consensual. The article does not say it was not consensual. So I don't understand what she did wrong. Who was the victim of this crime?
/r/MensRights04/10/12 07:33 AM
1

That's stupid. The government shouldn't be able to disallow something like this in a private establishment. If, for some reason, they don't want to charge a specific group of people, they should be allowed. I don't care who that group of people is or isn't.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 03:12 AM
3

If it was consentual, which the article leads me to believe, then I thinks he deserves no charges. I would feel the same with reversed genders as well. the problem with these cases is my gender neutral opinion is rare.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 08:36 PM
2

There are many additional costs associated with pregnancy.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 11:56 AM
11

The reproductive choices of men and women become equal and women lose the primacy now conferred on them as a result of gestation. Gasp How terrible!
/r/MensRights24/09/12 10:48 AM
238

Because OP left this out, this was posted on 4chan/b/ by a guy claiming that it was part of a mandatory class/workshop type of thing at his university. It also claimed that if a girl is drunk, and has sex with a guy while conscious, and then the next day regrets it, it is rape because she wouldn't have done that normally. Here is the video in question
/r/MensRights21/09/12 09:07 AM
2

I don't understand how having a father-daughter dance is sexist. I don't have a father, but I didn't try to get all the father-son events cancelled at my schools, as that doesn't benefit me and takes away an enjoyable experience from others. Perhaps they should change it to parent-child dance for kids in a fatherless situation, but this sin't sexism. If it is discrimination at all, it is against fatherless children.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 08:56 AM
3

2 years is a joke. she should get whatever punishment the men she accused of raping would have got for rape, times three to account for each guy. Or more.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 11:41 PM
1

I think life sentence is significantly more cruel then death penalty. Think about it; Death penalty is a couple years on death row, life sentence is usually going to be much longer then that in pretty much the same conditions.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 05:51 AM
2

Really unfortunate thumbnail.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 05:22 AM
1

Perhaps in the long term, but for young people who realistically don't plan to be with their gf/bf for years, delaying sex would not have this effect.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 11:22 AM
1

I don't understand why this type of thing is a big deal. Private parties should be allowed to discriminate as they see fit. It becomes a problem only when public spaces or services discriminate. If they want to only allow women into their exhibit, I don't see why they should be forced to allow men. I don't understand why they would want to disallow such a large potential audience, but I think they should be allowed to do so.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 05:31 AM
1

This isn't law suit worthy. this isn't even news or post worthy. Many places have a ladies free night, or a men free night, or insert group of people here free night. It isn't discrimination, its promotion.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 08:23 PM
5

they are NOT asking for special treatment Actually, yeah they are. When you go into an environment where ridicule is so common as to be expected constantly, expecting to not be ridiculed is asking for special treatment.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 08:15 PM
2

it is funny but it does it make it ok? Yeah, pretty much. It really isn't that big of a deal. TV is supposed to be for entertainment, keep that in mind.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 07:27 PM
4

It has nothing to do with the fact that women raped a man, the reason it isn't getting coverage is because who the fuck cares about Africa? Seriously, shit happens all the time in Africa and the world gives no fucks about it. This is just another example.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 08:20 PM
-32

That doesn't prove anything; You posted the original image, then your wall which does not feature the image, then someone named seth on your friends list. All of these things can be done without the story being genuine.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 07:43 AM
1

really won't even be missed. LOL no. They are very different from nerve endings in regular skin. That is not even close to a valid comparison. Does holding hands feel like a handjob? No. Are nerve endings in your hand the same as the ones in your dick? No.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 01:17 AM
10

Mutilation, according to Princeton's WordNetWeb, consists of "an injury that causes disfigurement or that deprives you of a limb or other important body part". The nerve endings in your dick aren't an important body part?
/r/MensRights15/07/12 09:33 PM
0

Again, would you be saying the same thing if a man fucked a 13 year old girl? Yeah. It is sexist to look at the gender reversed situation differently. Consensual sex is consensual sex. Just because you think the person was too young to consent doesnt mean the person themself did. At the end of the day, if the kid consented to it, it is not rape. This is like saying girls who get too drunk are raped when they consent to have sex with someone due to the alcohol.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 01:10 AM
-3

"The woman should have known better" doesn't help me to understand the logic behind what she should have known better.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 12:24 AM
-3

I don't understand your logic.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 12:08 AM
-5

I totally agree that the group of children who would be able to consent is a small minority. However, the article pays no attention to this at all, and the author acts as if this was entirely the teacher's idea.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 07:12 PM
-7

Who gives a shit whether or not he can legally consent? Isn't the bigger issue whether or not he actually consented? I mean, if the entire time he was game for what happened, there should be no problem. Unless I misread the article, it was sex, not rape. inb4 all sex at that age is rape.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 06:07 PM
0

I don't know how I feel about this. I do not support ritualistic circumcision unless the boy is old enough to understand what is going to happen and consent to it. That said, pretty much the only people in Germany, where this is proposed to be banned, are the Jews. So to me it seems like a bad reason for a good thing.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 07:16 PM
2

Not that I agree, but that is a pretty common viewpoint. Very stupid, but also very common.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 08:43 PM
1

"Poor boys in Africa die faster then rich British girls." No shit, Sherlock. This isn't a gender issue, its an economic one.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 07:01 PM
12

Are Australian judges required to be identified on documents like this? Who was this judge and what is their contact info? I'de like to write him/her a letter.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 07:59 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter