politits Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
10	Anyone find it weird that June, which was men's mental health month is now pride month? “Pride Month began after the Stonewall riots, a series of gay liberation protests in 1969.” “Since 1994, June has been recognized as Men's Health Month.” Your entire premise is backwards. And one doesn’t take away from the other. People can care about two issues at once. Go fix your mental health and stop looking for scapegoats.	/r/MensRights	05/06/23 07:55 AM
8	To release her by freeing a corrupt arms dealer linked to genocide and…..letting an innocent man rot in jail. No bias. Nothing to see. He’s not innocent. He was court martialed by the US military for crimes committed against the US while on active duty. Fuck that guy. Using him as a prop is pure propaganda.	/r/MensRights	08/12/22 10:42 PM
14	What to do if you’re young and matured fast? All the girls my age seem so immature. How to find wifey material? Stop arguing and listen to these valid criticisms. That’s the mature thing to do. As this commenter pointed out, you’re not mature, you’re just driven and very serious, very full of yourself, overly judgmental, and sound like not a lot of fun. Fun and maturity are not opposites or mutually exclusive. Your description of yourself and criticism of others doesn’t show emotional intelligence, self-awareness, social intelligence, humility, and all kinds of other things you’re clearly lacking that you…	/r/seduction	16/10/22 10:36 PM
0	used to be a huge fan of r/atheism but since the roe vs wade ruling it's become a feminist cesspool. Hahahahahaha. You think you know more/better about Catholicism than the fucking pope AND the bible. Just start calling yourself a Christo-fascist already, that’s clearly your real religion.	/r/MensRights	28/09/22 11:25 PM
0	used to be a huge fan of r/atheism but since the roe vs wade ruling it's become a feminist cesspool. Exactly! The mother is the womb, so when her life is in danger abortion is permitted by Catholicism. Likewise when the baby cannot survive. Several states now have blanket abortion bans which violate catholic doctrine. And again, Biden is pro-choice because his religion shouldn’t dictate anyone’s right to bodily autonomy and healthy care. But assuming that he believes and acts on everything the Vatican approves of, that still means his pro-choice stance is closer to catholic doctrine than blanke…	/r/MensRights	28/09/22 05:39 PM
1	used to be a huge fan of r/atheism but since the roe vs wade ruling it's become a feminist cesspool. The Vatican supports abortion in life-saving cases. The Bible states clearly that life begins at first breath. You are 100% wrong and so are the states with blanket bans even according to the church. Your statement is entirely false. The pope is a catholic and supports abortion in life-saving cases. Please stop arguing and look it up. You’re already on the internet, so make good use of it instead of showing people how ignorant you are. Also, he supports the right to choose because he doesn’t let…	/r/MensRights	28/09/22 02:15 PM
1	used to be a huge fan of r/atheism but since the roe vs wade ruling it's become a feminist cesspool. The Bible states clearly that life begins at first breath. Those fetuses don’t have souls according to the Bible. The church allows for abortion in certain cases. The GOP are defying freedom of religion in their blanket ban of abortion. Also, he supports people’s rights to their own bodily autonomy, not abortion. Because we live in a democracy and have inalienable rights, not in a theocracy. You want that get the fuck out of America and go live in Afghanistan or Iran.	/r/MensRights	28/09/22 04:53 AM
0	used to be a huge fan of r/atheism but since the roe vs wade ruling it's become a feminist cesspool. First off, the Bible says life begins at the first breath. So no. Also, he doesn’t support abortion, he supports choice and rights to bodily autonomy. He recognizes, like the medical community does in cases concerning organ donation and blood donation and choice over surgeries, that people have a constitutional right over their own bodies and that fetuses that cannot survive outside of a womb are not people and thus don’t have rights. A dead person who didn’t sign their drivers license to be an …	/r/MensRights	28/09/22 04:50 AM
1	used to be a huge fan of r/atheism but since the roe vs wade ruling it's become a feminist cesspool. He is a devout practicing catholic who attends church every Sunday, does confession, communion, etc. He just doesn’t let his personal religion infect his politics like the constitution demands.	/r/MensRights	27/09/22 06:02 PM
1	Search "Body Positivity" on Google Images and see the results for yourselves. It's not "body" positivity it's "female" positivity. So add to the conversation instead of complaining and blaming women for getting off their asses and doing something about it from their perspective: write articles, start a body positivity IG page and post pics, start a podcast or YouTube channel to talk about the male side of this issue.	/r/MensRights	27/09/22 06:00 PM
1	Why can't you report Onlyfans bait as sexual harassment? Hahaha. I absolutely didn’t and don’t and never said anything like that. Go find the quote from me that says that. You just made it up. Good luck with your lawsuit against digital advertising.	/r/MensRights	07/09/22 11:11 PM
0	Why can't you report Onlyfans bait as sexual harassment? Who said I accept friend requests from randoms hoping to get naked pics? You did. Then you called me a pervert for something you thought of that isn’t real. Then you act high and mighty based on this imaginary scenario of yours. Get a life dude. You’re receiving ads from business accounts. If you don’t like it unsubscribe. End of story. And if you don’t “agree” with me and think you’re right then file a lawsuit or try to press charges and find out what happens instead of whining about how it isn…	/r/MensRights	07/09/22 10:24 PM
2	Is it weird that I don't want to sleep around anymore Your limited life experience is not indicative of all that there is. Also, why are you making it about you? Instead of only leaning on what you have personally experienced, you could look up whatever subject is in question and actually learn about it. All research into the subject has shown there are dozens of working open relationships that the couple keeps quiet about for every one you hear about failing. And the reason you hear about the ones that failed is because those are salacious items f…	/r/seduction	07/09/22 02:08 PM
7	Is it weird that I don't want to sleep around anymore Exactly. Breakups happen all the time and then you can go back to being single and fucking everything that moves until the next one comes along that’s worth giving up the single life for. But you might want to look into open relationships. A lot of men would be surprised by how many women would be down for something less rigid and limiting and with more room to explore sexually.	/r/seduction	06/09/22 03:31 PM
34	Is it weird that I don't want to sleep around anymore Not at all. Upping your body count just for the sake of it and denying yourself meaningful relationships is a great way to feel empty inside and miss out on some of the most profound experiences a person can have. When you’re single, fuck everyone you want. But some people are worth giving up being single for. And if you’re like me, maybe something in between like an open relationship is what works best so you don’t have to choose between one extreme or the other. Either way, do what’s best for …	/r/seduction	06/09/22 03:02 PM
1	Why can't you report Onlyfans bait as sexual harassment? Is a sucker Repeatedly falls for the same trick Cries about it on the internet Has the errors in his thinking pointed out Calls someone a pervert because he can’t handle valid criticism We don’t have to agree, and you have some valid points, but you’re name calling and acting like a baby.	/r/MensRights	29/08/22 01:15 PM
-11	Do you guys also hate this saying? This is such an incredibly dumb take from someone who admits that they have zero firsthand knowledge of this phenomenon. People get divorced for all kinds of reasons, doesn’t mean they’re going to saddle you with baggage. Also, non-married people come with serious baggage all the time. What were the bad choices that led single people to still be single, huh? Guess everyone on the planet isn’t marriage material by your dumb criteria. Also, that’s what the dating period is for, to assess compatibi…	/r/MensRights	29/08/22 02:29 AM
-7	Do you guys also hate this saying? You sure like talking about cockholding a lot, especially in conversations that have nothing to do with it. It’s ok if you’re into that. Stop judging yourself and others. Be free little cuck. Go cuck your little cuck heart out.	/r/MensRights	29/08/22 02:15 AM
-9	Do you guys also hate this saying? First off, you have a sad, pathetic, gross, angry, miserable outlook on life. The only loser in this scenario is you. My stepdad could have had almost anyone, but chose my mom because they complemented each other. Also, my mom had her choice and chose him and his kids. Also, she would never waste her time on a loser like you. Why are you and OP taking this phrase as a condemnation of single guys?!? It’s comparing good step dads to dead best bio dads. This whole thread is full of completely brain…	/r/MensRights	29/08/22 02:08 AM
2	Do you guys also hate this saying? It’s not about you. Why are you making it about yourself? I think the phrase is cheesy as hell, but as the child of a deadbeat, abusive dad who abandoned his family, I’m grateful for my stepdad for taking on a family when he didn’t have to. So cheesy or not, the phrase is about stepdads who happily took on the role of primary father figure for kids whose bio-dads couldn’t give a fuck about them.	/r/MensRights	29/08/22 01:58 AM
2	I'm getting really sick and tired of being discriminated against on first dates. 1) this doesn’t meet the definition of discrimination. Not even close. What you’re describing is rejection. And you’re getting rejected for good reason as detailed below. 2) inviting them over for a first date is always a bad idea because they genuinely do have to worry about their safety. Most rape is date rape. So even asking is already a red flag to most women even if cooking for others is a nice gensture since you’re a complete stranger and no one should trust complete strangers enough to co…	/r/MensRights	28/08/22 01:52 AM
0	Why can't you report Onlyfans bait as sexual harassment? Do you know these women? Why are you accepting friend requests from strangers? “To open up your world view???” What does that even mean? Are you unaware that people use social media for monetary/business purposes, and that this is one of those business purposes, and that women who do this professionally use those social media services expressly for the purpose of adding followers to their business accounts to sell services and expand their customer base? And that you’re going along with it by ac…	/r/MensRights	27/08/22 07:58 PM
0	Why can't you report Onlyfans bait as sexual harassment? Given that OP you are accepting the friend request from these random women, who you don’t know, for the express reason of being able to ogle their sexy photos, then I don’t think it’s unsolicited for them to offer you more. And you can say no. If they keep offering you more than what you consented to, or send you nudes against your consent, then THAT would be harassment. But what you described is not harassment.	/r/MensRights	25/08/22 10:13 PM
0	Why can't you report Onlyfans bait as sexual harassment? Selling a product (photos and vids) is different than a coworker or otherwise trying to fuck you in real life though. Two mitigating factors are that some anonymous person over the internet doesn’t have access to you and that intent matters.	/r/MensRights	25/08/22 01:03 PM
0	Why can't you report Onlyfans bait as sexual harassment? It’s not an advance though! It’s spam mail/ads! It’s not even anywhere fucking close to the same thing.	/r/MensRights	24/08/22 05:14 AM
0	Why can't you report Onlyfans bait as sexual harassment? What you just described is spam mail, not sexual harassment. Again, see the definition above.	/r/MensRights	23/08/22 08:31 PM
-4	Why can't you report Onlyfans bait as sexual harassment? No it doesn’t. Ads are different than a person physically or verbally harassing you. Pornhub’s banner ads aren’t sexual harassment. Neither are people adding their OF links to social. You don’t have to click it. If someone is harassing you at work in your physical space or cyberstalking you you can’t get away from it. That’s harassment. On social you can unfollow. This is some wild, asinine dumb crybaby false victim bullshit you and OP are trying to argue.	/r/MensRights	23/08/22 02:37 PM
-2	Why can't you report Onlyfans bait as sexual harassment? Way to sidestep the actual topic. Oxford defines sexual harassment as “unacceptable physical contact, comments about sex, etc., usually happening at work, that a person finds annoying and offensive.” No one is making unwanted touches or comments toward or about you. OP is complaining about advertising. Not anywhere near the same thing.	/r/MensRights	23/08/22 01:59 PM
-4	Why can't you report Onlyfans bait as sexual harassment? Do you feel threatened or intimidated by it? No. Just annoyed. So not harassment. There solved it for you. Now stop distracting with petty bullshit and get to talking about actual human rights issues pertaining to men.	/r/MensRights	23/08/22 01:34 PM
2	What does it tell about a girl who was determined to have casual relationship after divorce? You said “this guy cannot change and it’s not his fault” which is extremely ignorant and bigoted. He can understand constructive criticism and is capable of growing and changing as a person, regardless of his brain chemistry. Stop getting defensive and instead reflect on your views and behavior and grow from it, just like I suggested to OP.	/r/seduction	22/08/22 04:22 PM
3	What does it tell about a girl who was determined to have casual relationship after divorce? Everything you said is really ignorant and bigoted as well as blatantly incorrect. Autistic people are more than capable of growing/changing/picking up new skills, social or otherwise. Maybe you should focus on your own personal growth so you don’t come across as such an idiot and asshole in the future.	/r/seduction	22/08/22 03:24 PM
4	What does it tell about a girl who was determined to have casual relationship after divorce? You seriously sound like you have next to zero experience or understanding of human relations or emotions, so I’m going to break this down for you in the most basic ways: She was just in a serious relationship, it didn’t work out for whatever reason, which happens often and the reason is none of your business or concern unless she wants to tell you eventually, and now she wants a break from serious relationships because she just foot out of one. All of that is normal and healthy. As for why she …	/r/seduction	22/08/22 12:00 PM
1	If women love sex , why do they make it hard to get ? Setting aside that most people need to have a connection with someone they’re going to sleep with, it’s because most straight guys are bad at sex, and while “bad sex” for guys means it wasn’t great, for women that can mean it’s painful or even cause serious injury. Even if it’s not painful, women are very unlikely to orgasm from casual sex because most men don’t make getting them off a priority and are only focussed on their own pleasure (or genuinely don’t know women’s anatomy and how to get wo…	/r/seduction	20/08/22 03:50 PM
11	medication to help talk to girls? Dude, talk to a psychiatrist about this, not a bunch of pick up “artists.” Half the replies are people who don’t believe in psychiatric meds despite their proven use, and the other half are telling you to self-medicate with alcohol which is a TERRIBLE idea. It sounds like you need to be on anti-anxiety meds. But taking them twice a week won’t work, they have to be in your system regularly. I’ve seen it work wonders for people with your kind of issues. Please look into it sincerely and stop takin…	/r/seduction	30/07/22 06:09 PM
8	Am I a Simp for this? Dude… It’s really sad that you care what internet strangers think and will let us decide this for you. But it’s equally sad that you care about whether or not people will put a label on you for taking a cheap flight to see someone you like and are attracted to and who wants to have casual sex with you. What the actual fuck is wrong with you? Because from here it looks like just about everything. You’re a simp for sure, just not for the reasons you’re asking. And you’re really lucky she doesn’t k…	/r/seduction	19/07/22 11:25 PM
-6	Getting a DNA test in NY Hahaha. Oh, NOW you have nothing to worry about (even though you already admitted you had no reason to worry in the first place). Actions speak louder than words and your actions are wildly paranoid by your own admission. Please seek help.	/r/MensRights	19/07/22 07:27 PM
1	how is an average man disadvantaged in dating? I never said one was ok and the other isn’t. I’m saying the exact opposite. I think both are fine. You think both are bad. But the previous comment is an obvious double standard that shows hypocrisy in his negative bias toward women.	/r/seduction	19/07/22 07:25 PM
-9	Getting a DNA test in NY You’re mentally unwell. Please get help yourself as well as for the sake of your marriage and your child. Relationships are built on trust and you have none and for admittedly no reason. I genuinely feel sorry for your wife and kid. Please get help, as this level of paranoia is bound to lead somewhere much darker than just secret illegal paternity tests (which in itself is already unhinged behavior).	/r/MensRights	19/07/22 06:28 PM
-11	Getting a DNA test in NY This is such extremely insecure behavior. You admittedly have no reason for distrusting your partner, yet you distrust her in the worst way, need outside validation despite knowing all of this, sneak around her back and local laws to quiet your irrational insecurity… this is so sad. Your relationship and partner AND kid deserve better. You should put all of this effort and energy into therapy instead of DNA tests since your own brain is the only actual issue here.	/r/MensRights	19/07/22 02:27 PM
1	how is an average man disadvantaged in dating? It’s funny and sad that you use language like “pump and dump” and in doing so assume that the guy dumped her and not that she got sick of a fuck boy. If you assume men use women and not the other way around you are a misogynist. And the rest of your statement shows that you have a lot of hate and hold a lot of negative stereotypes about women. Women use fuck boys and drop them all the time. Nothing wrong with someone who’s single getting laid in between relationships. You high five your boys for…	/r/seduction	19/07/22 12:10 PM
1	Do girls ever tell guys to stop contacting them as a test? It’s not a test, she stated her choice clearly AND gave reasoning to you. Stop texting her and respect her decision. Continuing to text her is low-level harassment. Also, don’t lie to women. It will only burn you as it did here. She likely wouldn’t have cut you off if you had told the truth and didn’t play games. If someone doesn’t like your body count then you’re not compatible anyway. But regardless, nearly all women have a bigger issue with lying and deception than they do with high body coun…	/r/seduction	30/06/22 04:04 PM
1	why are white women so difficult to escalate with compared to black or Hispanic women? That’s beyond ridiculous. Being smooth, strong silent type, etc. demonstrate confidence. It’s BDE. Good game is like a dance. Being too eager is a turnoff for most women.	/r/seduction	22/06/22 02:06 PM
120	why are white women so difficult to escalate with compared to black or Hispanic women? It’s cultural. They prefer subtlety to being super direct.	/r/seduction	21/06/22 09:55 PM
2	What does a woman mean when she say's she just doesn't feel the connection? “I’m a bit shy and I don’t open up easily.” You said it yourself. Hard to make a more meaningful connection or generate interest to go further if you keep things at surface level. No more chit chat, small talk, etc. Talk about deeper shit, things that you’re passionate about. Create excitement. You have to find a way to push past your comfort zone and open up more.	/r/seduction	21/06/22 01:35 PM
1	How do you stop putting hot girls on a pedestal? They’re just people like anyone else. The fact that you even categorize them as “hot girls” shows that you think of them differently. They’re not another species. It’s an individual who you’re attracted to. Just treat that person like another guy who you’d be interested in being friends with and getting to know better. The more you remember that they’re just people and get over your own attraction to them the faster you’ll be able to approach them and not get nervous.	/r/seduction	15/06/22 04:12 PM
-6	"Rape is rape - it's simple you idiot". First off, almost no rape happens between strangers. Just want to clear up that common misconception. Almost all cases of rape involve a perpetrator who is known by the victim (date rape, significant other, friend, relative, boss or coworker, etc). That said, some partners are ok with their partner grabbing them and trying to have sex with them in their sleep and some aren’t. That’s actually a specific kink. But that should be clearly communicated between both parties ahead of time. Any time you…	/r/MensRights	13/06/22 09:58 PM
2	What are your smoothest lines/openers you've used with girls? If you’re coming up with witty, funny remarks on the moment (which is always a good thing) that’s literally the exact opposite of a “line” which is premeditated and generic, not specific to the person or environment or situation, etc. What you’re talking about is just being a good conversationalist and generally an engaging person to chat with, which is always good, vs cheesy pickup lines which are always a bad idea.	/r/seduction	31/05/22 03:53 PM
12	What are your smoothest lines/openers you've used with girls? “Hey, what’s your name?” Is by far the greatest pickup line of all time. You’re trying way too hard and women will pick up on that. Also, lines don’t lead to a conversation. Just treat them like people and show a genuine effort to get to know them and demonstrate interest in them.	/r/seduction	31/05/22 03:53 AM
1	AOC called out for divisive comments about patriarchy and masculinity after TX school shooting That’s just so incredibly dumb. The definition of masculinity is not “good.” Look it up in a dictionary. YOU think it’s good no matter what, even though every culture on earth acknowledges that you can take anything too far to the point that it becomes a problem. You are objectively wrong here and your argument has all the maturity and intelligence of a five year old saying “nuh uh. Is not.” And that second paragraph is literally nonsense. You used a bunch of words to try to sound smart but actu…	/r/MensRights	30/05/22 02:09 PM
1	AOC called out for divisive comments about patriarchy and masculinity after TX school shooting “ThE rEaL dIfFeReNcE….” Distract, ignore, repeat. Men are 7-8x as likely to murder as women. That is the story and you’re still blatantly refusing to acknowledge it let alone attempt to try to answer why. And yes, men are also the vast majority of murder victims, proving that men are both the perpetrators of and victims of the undeniable male violence epidemic. So why are you trying your best to pretend this isn’t happening and instead helping save men from themselves and each other?	/r/MensRights	29/05/22 10:09 PM
1	AOC called out for divisive comments about patriarchy and masculinity after TX school shooting https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2019/crime-in-the-u.s.-2019/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-6.xls It’s really telling that you’re spending all of your time and energy nit picking the exact statistics while ignoring the entire point of this backed by repeated and undeniable evidence, including the stats YOU provided which paint the best case scenario that either of us could find, which proves beyond all reasonable doubt that there is a massive male violence and murder epidemic. You’re no…	/r/MensRights	29/05/22 09:08 PM
0	AOC called out for divisive comments about patriarchy and masculinity after TX school shooting We aren’t talking about women. You’re deflecting and distracting. It’s not a comparison or a competition and nothing you said negates the harmful and very real effects of toxic masculinity. Men are hurting themselves and each other and other people are victimized by their violence as well when men snap under the pressure that we/themselves/society put them under. That has nothing to do with women aside from women also buying into toxic masculinity and going along with men always having to be tou…	/r/MensRights	29/05/22 06:29 PM
1	AOC called out for divisive comments about patriarchy and masculinity after TX school shooting “Isn’t likely to be radically different” the year before yours was a 12% difference from your stats. You’re claiming like a 9% difference from that stat would be incomprehensible and impossible when a 12% leap in that same direction was just proven using the same data you used. You can call bullshit all you want, at this point we’re arguing semantics. Point is, even with the lowest figure we found there is an undeniable male violence epidemic and no other rational explanation behind men being at…	/r/MensRights	29/05/22 06:22 PM
-1	AOC called out for divisive comments about patriarchy and masculinity after TX school shooting Cool. Thanks for “contributing” by calling BS and adding nothing else. Fine, throw the 97% stat out and use the others. 89% for 2019 still stands. So does your own example where women commit 11% to mens 77% despite being basically 50/50 in population. That means men are 7 TIMES as likely to commit murder than women and you think that stat is worth celebrating because it’s not 97%? Or you think it’s not a big deal because it’s slightly less completely horrific than 97%? Guess there’s no massive e…	/r/MensRights	28/05/22 10:59 PM
0	AOC called out for divisive comments about patriarchy and masculinity after TX school shooting Taking anything too far is a bad thing. That’s what “toxic masculinity” means. You’re attempting to redefine it specifically to make sure that anything synonymous with “masculine” means good, which is ridiculous. Toxic masculinity exists and it hurts men as much as anyone: the pressure to always be tough and “be a man” and never cry and never show weakness is a sure fire way to lead to mental health issues, violence, and suicide having a meat and fat based diet and thinking vegetables and other …	/r/MensRights	28/05/22 10:52 PM
0	AOC called out for divisive comments about patriarchy and masculinity after TX school shooting I didn’t make it up. It varies by year. 97% was the case the last time I checked, but I can’t remember what year that was. Just found the stats for 2019 and it’s 89% of murderers that were perpetrated by men. Your 77% stat doesn’t negate the point at all, either. Women commit 11% of murders compared to 77% for men. Men make up 49% of the population, women 51%, yet men are drastically more likely to commit murder. https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2019/crime-in-the-u.s.-2019/tables/expanded-ho…	/r/MensRights	28/05/22 08:13 PM
0	AOC called out for divisive comments about patriarchy and masculinity after TX school shooting Again, I’m not having to do any reaching. And again, I didn’t have to prompt you to admit hate and several other serious issues a second time just now. I’m so sorry for what happened to you. Sexual assault is horrible and causes lasting trauma to any victim. I really encourage you to seek help before you are consumed by your own negative feels. It doesn’t have to be that way. I appreciate you admitting that you hate yourself too. That is definitely a problem as well. I really hope you seek help.…	/r/MensRights	28/05/22 07:24 PM
1	AOC called out for divisive comments about patriarchy and masculinity after TX school shooting No one prompted you to tell on yourself that you hate women and project that onto “most men.” You chose your own words freely. I didn’t have to reach an inch.	/r/MensRights	28/05/22 07:17 PM
0	AOC called out for divisive comments about patriarchy and masculinity after TX school shooting No. Most people would not say that. You just outed yourself as an extremist. And if you are really claiming that you don’t see hatred, just venting, then I have news for you: a sizable portion of that “venting” you’re seeing is hatred and you are blind to it because you “hate” how you’ve been treated by women. Not “I wish I had more luck with women.” You said “hate” and then projected that hate onto most men when that isn’t even close to being the case, the same way that rapists thibk that most …	/r/MensRights	28/05/22 06:56 PM
-4	AOC called out for divisive comments about patriarchy and masculinity after TX school shooting She’s not wrong, and “toxic masculinity” is not the same as masculinity and it is recognized by the American psychiatric association for a reason. “The University in California did a comprehensive study of school/mass/spree shooters of all ages & found that the common link between them ALL is a vehement hatred of women (80% had a history of domestic violence). Most killed a female relative/gf/wife immediately prior to the event” And commenters on this sub are blaming women and “misandry” and not…	/r/MensRights	28/05/22 05:55 PM
13	Having a female best friend is undoubtedly one of the reasons I have success with other girls. Those aren’t friends, those are assholes. Get female friends, not assholes who happen to be women.	/r/seduction	17/05/22 03:47 PM
23	Why do women feel entitled of you as men taking them out to dinner on a first date? Uh… this sounds like a You problem. “They send you a list of restaurants they like and what they like to order…” I’m 41 and been doing this at a highly successful level for 16 years in NYC and this has literally never happened to me. You are either picking awful people who are openly using you and/or you come across as a chump that they can openly use for a free meal and you’re still going with it no matter how obvious they are making it that they are using you and have no interest in you otherw…	/r/seduction	07/03/22 12:41 PM
2	If you’re an older guy dating a younger girl like 18-23, will the girl always have daddy issues? I’m not making assumptions, I’m inferring. There’s a huge difference. If you say “I ate grilled cheese and tomato…” I can guess with near certainty that “soup” is the next word of your sentence. You went into a decent amount of detail and it’s very easy to see the bigger picture around it based on what you said. For example: someone doesn’t have to tell you they’re stupid, they can just say a whole bunch of stupid shit and it’s not an assumption to conclude that they’re stupid when they’ve obvio…	/r/seduction	02/03/22 05:35 PM
2	If you’re an older guy dating a younger girl like 18-23, will the girl always have daddy issues? First off, everyone has daddy issues. Secondly, you admitted that your ex-girlfriend dumped and blocked you because you texted her something that pissed her off. That has nothing to do with daddy issues. That’s someone who got sick of you being an asshole. And the fact that you use language to minimize what it was or how bad it was means it was probably worse than you’re letting on and definitely not the first time. Maybe you did have to walk on eggshells as well, but you’re letting on that you …	/r/seduction	01/03/22 07:24 AM
1	After trying this stuff for 4 months I concluded that nothing works unless the woman is already attracted to you from the start and everything here is basically bullshit I was a late bloomer too, but I’ve far surpassed anyone I knew when I was younger as far as social skills and success with women. Some things come more naturally to some than others. But hard work and dedication beat natural talent every time. Don’t worry about what anyone else is doing, just improve yourself and become a well-rounded person with a lot going for you, whatever that is, and your “luck” with women will improve.	/r/seduction	01/03/22 01:37 AM
4	After trying this stuff for 4 months I concluded that nothing works unless the woman is already attracted to you from the start and everything here is basically bullshit You’re close, but missing a few keys: you’re right that most of this sub is awful bullshit, and you’re on the right path in working on yourself physically in the gym and with grooming. Now you need to step up your social/conversational skills and emotional intelligence. Were you pitching these women and trying to impress them or were you demonstrating genuine interest in them and the things they said? Are you self-aware about your faults? Can you laugh at yourself? Do you meditate? Are you in th…	/r/seduction	28/02/22 10:19 PM
2	Unpopular opinion: This subreddit teaches 'fake' methods for desperate & insecure guys. Work on your inner confidence and i am sure you don't need this stupid subreddit. Thank you for saying this. Almost every single post and comment in this sub is not only worthless, it will actually set you back.	/r/seduction	24/02/22 08:11 PM
3	My hookup broke down in front of me? Knew him for 4 days I got the first quote exactly right. Just because you added “or break down” in the middle of that sentence doesn’t change the meaning or anything about about the part that says “never cry in front of your woman.” Technically I should have written it as “never cry… in front of your woman,” but that’s nit picking as those three dots still don’t change the meaning at all. Happy to give you this free English lesson. I’m sorry you feel condescended to when I point out that you’re claiming I put words…	/r/seduction	23/02/22 11:42 PM
1	My hookup broke down in front of me? Knew him for 4 days I didn’t put any words in your mouth. You said “NEVER cry in front of your woman.” Unless the definition of “never” changed then your original statement, as well as your defense of it, is toxic AF and everything I said still stands. Do you not understand what the phrase “putting words into my mouth” means? Do you know what an assumption is? Because I didn’t put any words in your mouth or make any assumptions, I just responded to a cristal-clear and incredibly fucked up statement you made with si…	/r/seduction	23/02/22 09:51 PM
0	My hookup broke down in front of me? Knew him for 4 days I feel sad for you that you think this is a good idea. If you can’t open up to your significant other than you don’t have a significant other. Either you’re only dating scumbags who actively exploit any weaknesses, which is you fault for dating complete pieces of shit, or you’re never lasting long enough in a relationship or getting close enough to anyone get to the point where opening up and letting your guard down is absolutely what you should be and need to be doing, or you just have serious …	/r/seduction	23/02/22 09:18 PM
-5	My hookup broke down in front of me? Knew him for 4 days Don’t share extremely personal stuff with people who you don’t already completely trust. She clearly was a POS given her reaction and you hadn’t figured that out yet. Sorry it took such an extreme reaction for you to learn that tough lesson, but hopefully you won’t make that mistake again. But the lesson there is to learn how to figure out who’s trustworthy, not that you can’t open up to people you trust and who genuinely care about you.	/r/seduction	23/02/22 07:48 PM
-4	My hookup broke down in front of me? Knew him for 4 days This is dumb as fuck and will lead to mental health issues. You’re supposed to be vulnerable in front of people who care about you and whom you can trust. Bottling it all up and only letting it out when you’re alone makes things way worse. Should you completely lose your shit? No, but having self-control is part of being a mature adult. But if you’re not able to open up and cry in front of a significant other than there is so much wrong with you and/or your relationship that it’s hard to know wh…	/r/seduction	23/02/22 07:22 PM
1	Is it normal to feel guilty for wanting women? You sound like you need therapy. Shame and guilt are often associated with sex, but it shouldn’t be that way it sounds like you’re on the extreme end of it. I think it would really help you to talk to a professional and work through those feelings so you have a healthy understanding and approach to sex and dating.	/r/seduction	03/02/22 08:07 PM
2	I asked her out, she said she doesn't know me much Pretty simple: just say “cool, happy to get to know you more first” and then ask her questions about her life. Text back and forth with her for a few days and then ask her out again.	/r/seduction	01/02/22 09:54 PM
2	As a woman you can’t seduce me by flirting if I’m not attracted to you : She said “along with flirting and being confident.” She’s not negating game at all. She’s just saying take basic care of yourself to not start out from being in a hole because she and most other women won’t give you a chance after that, so your game is irrelevant if you’re not baseline presentable. And people are arguing with her and downvoting her when it’s pretty common sense (aside from the voice thing that’s not something you can control much).	/r/seduction	31/01/22 09:34 PM
9	As a woman you can’t seduce me by flirting if I’m not attracted to you : Except that people are arguing with it up and down in the comments. So no. You and I think it’s unnecessary since it’s so basic and obvious. But most of the people on this thread are claiming it’s wrong and bad advice.	/r/seduction	31/01/22 09:01 PM
9	As a woman you can’t seduce me by flirting if I’m not attracted to you : Them hating on a woman and her perspective is exactly why they’re still here looking for, giving, and taking bad advice: they don’t actually want to grow or change/evolve as people. They just want to keep doing the same weak, ineffective bullshit and have other dumb misogynists tell them that they’re killing it.	/r/seduction	31/01/22 08:51 PM
8	As a woman you can’t seduce me by flirting if I’m not attracted to you : I actually can’t even believe you’re getting downvoted. This is basic, bare-minimum shit about higiene and grooming for the most part. This sub is laughable trash filled with trash humans with the occasional self-aware person looking for and giving valuable advice. A woman comes on and drops near-universal basics from a woman’s perspective and people nay-say and downvote. Clueless morons looking for yes men and a circle jerk of toxic bad moves.	/r/seduction	31/01/22 08:48 PM
3	Dated a 10/10 and I fucked it. Anyone else have this experience? How’d u move on? This. Almost everyone in this sub is dumb and shallow AF and missing the entire point of life and human interactions.	/r/seduction	20/01/22 07:27 PM
1	How? No, if you’re rude to people who are there to help you or someone who is in a subordinate position to you without provocation then you are a shitty person who needs to feel above others in order to feel good about yourself. Even once. Even if they mess up, as long as they are not rude to you and try to make up for it, then you are an asshole for being rude to them. Also, as pointed out above, your reply has literally nothing to do with the comment you replied to. You need to improve your reading…	/r/seduction	18/01/22 03:59 PM
2	15 dates , 6 women . I think I'm done guys..I'm really exhausted. This. Always leave on a good note. The only thing you can control in life is your reaction to things. Leave a good last impression no matter what they do since it really can come back to you like it did here.	/r/seduction	18/01/22 02:18 AM
0	Women can be extremely fickle with their emotions when you first get to know them. They can be attracted to you one day, and then lose interest the next. Understand and accept this before you develop feelings for someone you barely know Unless you’re bisexual you don’t have any personal experience with guys doing this, thus you don’t have any frame of reference for who does it more and the basis of your entire reply is moot. Both genders do it frequently, and the content of OP’s post is completely ridiculous and bad advice because it’s based on a false premise.	/r/seduction	14/01/22 10:33 PM
1	Women can be extremely fickle with their emotions when you first get to know them. They can be attracted to you one day, and then lose interest the next. Understand and accept this before you develop feelings for someone you barely know The specific things he’s pointing out and claiming are exclusively female ways of thinking/acting are not in any way exclusive to females and are demonstrably common behaviors in males. So while there are some differences between men and women, the fact that he keeps seeing a gender-neutral behavior as exclusively female and then goes into details about his blatantly incorrect theories on women tells us everything about his shortcomings in his thoughts/opinions on women and says absolutely nothi…	/r/seduction	14/01/22 06:27 PM
-1	Women can be extremely fickle with their emotions when you first get to know them. They can be attracted to you one day, and then lose interest the next. Understand and accept this before you develop feelings for someone you barely know I already said it plainly and explicitly, but it’s not surprising that you missed all of my points entirely, so I’ll say it again: Everything you described are things that men are infamous for doing, yet you ascribe those behaviors to women only and talk about women and their brains/thinking/behavior as if they are wildly different from men. They are not. You are stereotyping women in a negative way and to an extreme degree. It’s misogynistic and condescending, but coming from a person who lacks…	/r/seduction	14/01/22 03:17 PM
2	Women can be extremely fickle with their emotions when you first get to know them. They can be attracted to you one day, and then lose interest the next. Understand and accept this before you develop feelings for someone you barely know Women aren’t another species. Men do this to women too. Just because you don’t get it doesn’t make it a mystery. Your world view is incredibly stereotype driven. I wish I could give you more advice than to tell you that you just basically “don’t get it” but it’s hard to know where to begin with the low level of understanding you have toward basic human behavior. Good luck to you.	/r/seduction	14/01/22 06:48 AM
1	What’s the best US City for a single man? You said they were only holding out for relationships and not having casual sex. That is unequivocally false. I have friends all over the country and have travelled all over the country. No where has girls more open to casual aex than New York and it’s not even close.	/r/seduction	13/01/22 03:20 AM
3	What’s the best US City for a single man? You definitely didn’t say that. You literally said “it depends on a man’s personal goals.” Then you said, “Just cos shallow girls might reject you and him doesn’t mean they will reject all men.” You didn’t say anything about his preference, which is what he was talking about. You didn’t say “to each his own” like you’re saying now. You claimed he and I are being rejected by women that we are rejecting. I’m quoting you back to you. You’re arguing with yourself at this point. Just scroll back and …	/r/seduction	12/01/22 06:51 PM
8	What’s the best US City for a single man? No, it’s just single women and single men below 40. The gay population pushes the percentages even farther to the advantage of single/straight men. This article really puts it in perspective. There are almost double the number of 20-24 years old females in NYC than 20-24 year old males. Scroll down to the table to see. Every age demographic from there on up has more females as well. https://www.statista.com/statistics/799446/resident-population-of-nyc-by-sex-and-age/ The reason for the split is …	/r/seduction	12/01/22 06:41 PM
5	What’s the best US City for a single man? I’m not misreading anything. You’re still misreading both what he said and what I’m saying. Let me walk you through it: You said “it depends on a man’s personal goals” in response to him saying that it isn’t his preference. If he wanted to talk to and pick up someone vapid he could, it’s just not his preference. You’re arguing with someone on their opinions/taste. Read it again, he didn’t say he had a hard time with those types of women, he said he doesn’t enjoy it. And now you’re projecting tha…	/r/seduction	12/01/22 06:25 PM
24	What’s the best US City for a single man? Holy shit, this couldn’t be more wrong. Like literally everything you said. It’s so much easier to have casual sex in NY than anywhere else. It’s a 65-35 split between single women and single men under 40. Almost two girls for every guy. And they’re all DTF. I’m not trying to judge you in any way, but the other reply here is right. Everyone in NY is savy and the weak game that works on women elsewhere doesn’t work in NY. Sorry you had a bad experience, but you clearly needed to step it up.	/r/seduction	12/01/22 05:10 PM
10	What’s the best US City for a single man? You’re misreading what he’s saying. It’s not about goals, he has a hard time talking to vapid women, and so do I which is why I prefer women in NY over LA, Miami, or Vegas because they can actually hold a conversation and have depth to them.	/r/seduction	12/01/22 05:05 PM
16	What’s the best US City for a single man? NYC and it’s not even close. 65 percent of the population between 18-40 is female and most are hot AF (models, actresses, and women who moved there to live the Sex and the City lifestyle). Almost 2 girls for every guy and they’re fun, down, and sophisticated as well. It’s a single guy’s dreamland.	/r/seduction	12/01/22 05:03 PM
0	The whole thing about women’s only gyms Thanks again for showing your gross persecution complex and willful ignorance as well as extreme bias. What you are describing as hate speech are mostly valid complaints from people who are actually persecuted and oppressed. That is wildly different from actual hate speech where white supremecists and misogynists online are fomenting actual hate that leads to actual hate crimes like mass killings that have occurred against African Americans, Asian Americans, Jewish Americans, trans people, women…	/r/MensRights	29/12/21 09:54 AM
1	The whole thing about women’s only gyms They already do sleep with me. You wish you had my life but never will because you’re a misogynist. Empathy gets you a lot farther in life than hate.	/r/MensRights	28/12/21 12:22 PM
1	The whole thing about women’s only gyms That’s the last straw you have to try to grasp at? Ok, sure, “this guy is lying” and “all women are lying” is a much easier pill for you to swallow than the truth I guess. Good luck to you. I’m sure you’re doing just fine as is.	/r/MensRights	28/12/21 12:20 PM
1	The whole thing about women’s only gyms NYC has the lowest crime of the 10 most populous cities in America, but keep swinging and missing while you’re at it.	/r/MensRights	28/12/21 12:18 PM
0	The whole thing about women’s only gyms None of what you incoherently said above makes any sense and that’s not surprising at all given your malformed opinion and half-baked “thoughts.”	/r/MensRights	28/12/21 12:17 PM
0	The whole thing about women’s only gyms Thanks for showing your gross persecution complex aside from your willful ignorance.	/r/MensRights	28/12/21 12:16 PM
-7	The whole thing about women’s only gyms That’s not shaming. If he did they would have talked about this and he would know better.	/r/MensRights	27/12/21 10:07 PM
-8	The whole thing about women’s only gyms Let’s say that it was one out of a hundred. He’s in the room with a bunch of women. And depending on the guy/circumstances he would either be creeping our one woman to a serious degree or a bunch women repeatedly until we could intervene. So even based on tour own those numbers, you’re proving that in any large city/setting there absolutely IS a creeper around every corner. Women aren’t scared for their safety for no reason. They have a lifetime of experience since they were at least teenagers, …	/r/MensRights	27/12/21 10:03 PM
3	The whole thing about women’s only gyms As I commented to another person reveling in their own ignorance: The two most common “sex” chromosome combinations (cis men and women) are XY and XX respectively. There’s also XXY, XXX, XYY, XXYY, XXXY, XXXX, XXXXY, XXXXX, and X. Biology and biologists have proven without a doubt that there are several gender combinations. This is not up for interpretation. But I’m sure you’ll try to play whatever mental gymnastics you have to go try to say that you know more about human biology than biologists…	/r/MensRights	27/12/21 09:56 PM
0	The whole thing about women’s only gyms There is a proven link between frequency of hate speech and hate crimes. But keep thinking you’re innocent because you’re just doing it as a keyboard warrior while ignoring that a sizable percentage of hate crimes and mass killings are fomented by internet hate speech.	/r/MensRights	27/12/21 09:52 PM
0	The whole thing about women’s only gyms Way to argue semantics because that’s the only argument you have left. The two most common “sex” chromosome combinations (cis men and women) are XY and XX respectively. There’s also XXY, XXX, XYY, XXYY, XXXY, XXXX, XXXXY, XXXXX, and X. But keep telling yourself there are only two “sexes.” Biology and biologists have proven otherwise without a doubt. But keep wasting your time hating people who pose no threat to distract you from your own miserable life.	/r/MensRights	27/12/21 09:49 PM
-6	The whole thing about women’s only gyms Glad you brought up science and biology, because according to biology and biologists you’re wrong. There are about a dozen different combinations of gender chromosomes. But you’re clearly not a scholar or someone smart enough to listen to those who know subject better than you do. Keep showing us how proud you are of being angry and ignorant and wasting your own time hating people who don’t think about you for a second. Loser.	/r/MensRights	27/12/21 07:50 PM
-12	The whole thing about women’s only gyms Tell me you don’t have any female friends without telling me you don’t have any female friends. Either that or you just don’t get out much, or you do and you’re just not very observant. Or you do and you tolerate and or perpetuate creepiness. I used to be a bartender. I would see creepy behavior from at least one guy every night. I also live in NY. I see creepy behavior from men on the street on a near daily basis. Maybe it’s population density? Either way, you being ignorant of a problem doesn’…	/r/MensRights	27/12/21 07:38 PM
-10	The whole thing about women’s only gyms You had me on the first half. There are a lot of creepers and women have the right to keep themselves safe from them. Then you came in with a bigoted straw-man argument. Trans people are less of a threat than pretty much every other demographic, but they are being murdered at an incredible rate right now because people like you keep riling up the crazies and convincing them of a threat that doesn’t exist from people who are just trying to live their lives and be left alone. If you can’t advocate…	/r/MensRights	27/12/21 07:28 PM
1	[deleted by user] You’re bitter and impatient. And that comes across clearly in this post and I’m sure to women since they’re very perceptive and you’re blatantly advertising that fact. You don’t like “games” but it sounds like you’re describing dating, not people playing games. Sorry, but you need to be more patient in getting to know one another to allow things to develop naturally. You also want them to love you but you don’t seem very interested in getting to know them. And you call yourself a good guy but ad…	/r/seduction	19/12/21 12:53 PM
2	[deleted by user] This. Just be nice, friendly, honest, and direct. Ask them their name. Say you’d like to get to know them. Show a genuine interest in the things they say. If it goes well offer to exchange info and take them out for a drink or a bite sometime soon. Then pick somewhere fun that makes it easy to talk and spend more time to getting to know them and opening up to them about your interests and values and experiences and aspirations. You got this.	/r/seduction	14/12/21 02:54 PM
1	Is it worth it trying to get a girl to change some of her ways for you? Not at all ever.	/r/seduction	11/12/21 02:58 AM
15	Is anyone using machine learning to identify fat chicks? It’s actually based on who/how many swipe right on you and who/how many swipe right on them. https://thespinoff.co.nz/tech/18-07-2020/how-tinders-algorithm-is-micromanaging-your-dating-life	/r/seduction	10/12/21 04:02 PM
29	Is anyone using machine learning to identify fat chicks? Everything about this is awful.	/r/seduction	10/12/21 02:01 PM
7	If giving a woman head was openly on the table, no ambiguity, what would your success rate be? Way to brag that you’re terrible in bed 😂	/r/seduction	10/12/21 12:56 PM
2	[deleted by user] First off, good job recovering from your ex without staying bitter. You seemed to have moved on and grown from it in a way that’s really admirable. As for tour strategies: These are all great. You seem like a good guy who takes a genuine interest in people. You’re either organizing fun activities that give you something to do or talk about, or you’re having deep conversations and getting to know them and opening up to each other. I can’t speak for having kids and how that complicates things. But…	/r/seduction	10/12/21 12:39 PM
2	How do you recover from a poorly executed neg? Fair. In that case, just ignore it and move on and try to get back to being engaging, funny, playful, etc.	/r/seduction	08/12/21 05:10 PM
11	How do you recover from a poorly executed neg? Don’t neg anyone. It’s a POS move for assholes who don’t have any game and need to make people feel like shit to so they’ll stoop to fucking you and then regretting it. Instead, work on being the type of person they won’t regret fucking and then you won’t need to be an asshole and make people feel like shit to get laid. The bonus is that you’ll actually like and respect yourself too.	/r/seduction	08/12/21 03:29 PM
2	Has NYC gone downhill since the pandemic? You wish you were me and had my life and you should be glad you’ll never know the extent to which that is true. Bye racist incel.	/r/seduction	07/12/21 06:06 AM
2	Has NYC gone downhill since the pandemic? Hahaha. You racist trash. First off, you just told on yourself that you were bothered by seeing black people in your hood when you lived here. I don’t know anyone else who feels that way. So how else would you get that impression? And to back that up, you edit this post to get rid of racist language towards me: it used to say “Can it, Rabbi” you dumb racist scumbag garbage human. You didn’t know Reddit sent out emails when someone replies to your comment? You’re like one of those criminals that …	/r/seduction	07/12/21 04:20 AM
2	Has NYC gone downhill since the pandemic? You know nothing about NYC. We all interact with each other all day every day. No one freaks out when anyone of any race “comes” to any neighborhood because they’re all here all the time and no one thinks anything of it. You’re the place where Trayvon Martin got shot by someone who was stalking him and you’re the state that allowed that murderer to get away with it. You couldn’t be projecting any harder. And no one thinks DeBlasio did a good job. Please stop making an ass of yourself over and ov…	/r/seduction	07/12/21 12:06 AM
2	Has NYC gone downhill since the pandemic? Again, you just cannot stop Self-owning. Thanks again for shouting your ignorance loud and proud. Violence is up everywhere in the US since the pandemic started, that has nothing to do with NY or Blue states. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/620234/ And we just elected the guy with the most political experience (BK Borough President), not because he was a cop.	/r/seduction	06/12/21 10:46 PM
2	Has NYC gone downhill since the pandemic? Hahaha. Yeah, you’re the one living in reality, not me. Here’s a few quick fact checks: NY’s population actually increased despite the propoganda You swallow from the far right (aka mainstream Republican news sources like Fox): https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2021/08/12/us/new-york-city-population-growth.amp.html Crime is higher in red states than blue states per capita. Same with violent crime. Same with red counties vs blue counties. https://www.patheos.com/blogs/lovejoyfeminism/2…	/r/seduction	06/12/21 07:16 PM
2	Has NYC gone downhill since the pandemic? My kind? You mean people with more than half a brain cell? Trust me, they’re just there temporarily for the art or the beach and then they’ll leave because they can’t stand and entire state made up of “Florida man.” Good luck going through life ignorant and angry, Incel. Though yours might not last too long while ignoring Covid procedures like you are because of your freedumb.	/r/seduction	06/12/21 01:32 PM
1	Has NYC gone downhill since the pandemic? I was never planning on going to your butt-of-everyone-else’s-jokes embarrassment to the rest of our country state. You don’t have to ask me.	/r/seduction	05/12/21 10:14 AM
3	Has NYC gone downhill since the pandemic? Hahaha. Fuck off incel. Keep your hate and misery to yourself. And seriously, keep my people out of it. You’ll never be happy as long as you hang onto your current outlook on life.	/r/seduction	04/12/21 08:25 PM
4	Has NYC gone downhill since the pandemic? As a Jew, get our name out of your dumb anti-vax mouth and leave my people out of this. As a NYer, I’m about to throw a sex party tonight full of beautiful vaccinated women while you jerk off and stay angry and ignorant. Malone has nothing to do with this vaccine. He barely has anything to do with mRNA. He doesn’t have a Nobel prize, let alone a Nobel peace prize. You’re spouting complete fabricated nonsense and have no idea what the fuck you’re talking about. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ne…	/r/seduction	03/12/21 10:26 PM
4	Has NYC gone downhill since the pandemic? I never said we were ever going back to normal entirely. As for the rest If what you said, you are displaying a dangerous combination of ignorance and arrogance. You’re arguing with the world’s leading virologists and vaccine researchers, not with me. And I’m guessing you are neither one of the world’s leading virologists or vaccine researchers, so your opinion is worth nothing. What you’re doing/saying os just as dumb as of you were arguing about rocket science with NASA or particle physics wit…	/r/seduction	03/12/21 09:21 PM
3	Has NYC gone downhill since the pandemic? Nope. It’s not tyranny. It’s common sense public safety. Are drunk driving laws tyranny? They stop you from doing whatever the hell you want while potentially killing yourself and taking others with you. Same same. Vaccines and masks protect you and others and almost everyone is happy to do both and don’t even see it as anythibg other than a slight inconvenience. Stop projecting your selfish psychopathy onto others.	/r/seduction	03/12/21 07:54 PM
3	Has NYC gone downhill since the pandemic? Not at all. It’s the exact opposite, in fact. Hookups and dating have picked up since the vaccine came out and people are making up for lost time. And more young people have moved in to take the place of some young families who moved out during the pandemic. Nightlife is almost totally back to normal and more people are exploring open relationships and sex parties and such. The only mandate is that you are vaccinated to be indoors, which 75% of NYC residents are. The others are missing out by ch…	/r/seduction	03/12/21 05:26 PM
1	Saying a patriarchy exists is no different than saying a nebulous Jewish power exists to dominate Christians. It’s nonsense. And it’s designed to normalize violence against men. Just following up on this since you spelled out the problem at the root of this failed comparison yourself and i was hoping you’d see it: “Disproportionate influence” is the key. Who are they hoping to influence? The people in power. If Jews were the people in power, then they wouldn’t need to influence anyone. They would just be able to put things in motion themselves. Now try to apply this analogy to men as OP did. You can’t? Oh that’s right, because men are in power (they make up the vast maj…	/r/MensRights	30/11/21 05:11 PM
1	Saying a patriarchy exists is no different than saying a nebulous Jewish power exists to dominate Christians. It’s nonsense. And it’s designed to normalize violence against men. The irony of your statement is tragicomic and clearly lost on you.	/r/MensRights	30/11/21 05:02 PM
1	Saying a patriarchy exists is no different than saying a nebulous Jewish power exists to dominate Christians. It’s nonsense. And it’s designed to normalize violence against men. Is there a Jewish equivalent to man-splaining? Because you just did that. Thanks for explaining my own people’s history to me despite my very intimate knowledge of everything you said and then some.	/r/MensRights	30/11/21 02:08 AM
0	Saying a patriarchy exists is no different than saying a nebulous Jewish power exists to dominate Christians. It’s nonsense. And it’s designed to normalize violence against men. Being individually successful means that you’re the group in charge? And if Jews are so disproportionately influential as to be in power then how do they keep getting persecuted? If they had power they would be able to stop it. You literally just echoed the “wealthy Jews secretly run the world” conspiracy theory itself.	/r/MensRights	29/11/21 07:07 PM
-9	Saying a patriarchy exists is no different than saying a nebulous Jewish power exists to dominate Christians. It’s nonsense. And it’s designed to normalize violence against men. As a Jew I feel like I should weigh in on this: nope. It’s not at all the same. Stop trying to use our historical oppression to push your agenda. Men have historically always been in power, Jews have historically never been in power for thousands of years. These two things couldn’t have less to do with each other. You are not living in a violent matriarchy while being blamed for every problem in the world. No one is building gas chambers and ovens to mass murder men while claiming they caused al…	/r/MensRights	28/11/21 11:40 PM
1	Fraud in plain site. The Elizabeth Holmes 9 Billion $ fraud is one of the best examples of how feminists blinded reasonable people to frauds like her. She faked her voice trying to sound and look like Steve Jobs. And no one said anything. Yes, sometimes it takes time to gather evidence and create a solid case to charge people with. You keep acting like this is some kind of conspiracy when all you’re doing is showing that you don’t understand how things work.	/r/MensRights	21/11/21 03:34 PM
0	Fraud in plain site. The Elizabeth Holmes 9 Billion $ fraud is one of the best examples of how feminists blinded reasonable people to frauds like her. She faked her voice trying to sound and look like Steve Jobs. And no one said anything. Pharma bro is already in jail because his crimes happened first and his trial already happened and included. Do you not understand how tune works? Internet people blaming patriarchy for someone’s actions means that feminism ruined everything even though men are in charge of most of the government, most of our institutions (education, policing, etc.), most companies and industries, etc.? But people complaining on the internet means they’re in charge and also ruining the things that men made and s…	/r/MensRights	20/11/21 11:58 AM
-1	Fraud in plain site. The Elizabeth Holmes 9 Billion $ fraud is one of the best examples of how feminists blinded reasonable people to frauds like her. She faked her voice trying to sound and look like Steve Jobs. And no one said anything. The idiot feminists do. Congrats on following their example. Doing something dumb because someone else did is even worse than just doing something dumb on your own. “We’ll she did it first!” Just… wow. This is so incredibly childish I would be shocked if anyone older than 8 wrote this.	/r/MensRights	19/11/21 02:09 PM
-13	Fraud in plain site. The Elizabeth Holmes 9 Billion $ fraud is one of the best examples of how feminists blinded reasonable people to frauds like her. She faked her voice trying to sound and look like Steve Jobs. And no one said anything. This has literally nothing to do with feminism. By your “logic” Bernie Madoff’s scheme was also a result of feminism. Stop gendering everything and stop trying to blame literally anything and everything on feminism or women. Con artists are con artists.	/r/MensRights	18/11/21 11:31 PM
2	Huh? Why? You have a variety of grammar and syntax errors in your post to the point where what you said almost doesn’t make any sense. So you definitely fit the description of their complaint. And you’re not the only one. On average baby girls tend to start talking a few month before baby boys, whereas baby boys tend to walk sooner and get their physical coordination faster. Most guys never catch up because they don’t care to try or even notice that their social and conversational skills are lacking, but …	/r/seduction	09/11/21 02:10 PM
2	[deleted by user] Ok, so you’re not having double standards, you’re just extremely judgmental in general, including of yourself. Sounds like therapy might do you a lot of good as you have internalized a lot of negative views towards natural and healthy behaviors that you then project onto others as well.	/r/seduction	05/11/21 08:26 PM
1	[deleted by user] You are being unrealistic, unnecessarily judge mental, and a misogynistic hypocrite. If you could have slept with a different attractive woman every day of your life you would have. Stop having double standards. Body count doesn’t matter. Judge someone by their character and how they treat you and others. That’s it.	/r/seduction	05/11/21 07:35 PM
0	Guys who have slept with 100+ women. What's your secret? Actually, the key is to not be a womanizer. Stop treating women like an object or like a puzzle to be solved. They’re all different and you need to treat each individual as such. Be a genuine person. Take an actual interest in who they are and what they have to say. Otherwise they’ll sniff out your bullshit, realize you’re a fuckboi and not a man, dump you, and spread the word around to save other women from wasting their time with you. Even if word doesn’t get around, as you age women will be l…	/r/seduction	18/10/21 07:54 PM
-3	Where are you guys politically Facebook crashed themselves on purpose to bury the story of their whistle blower who’s scathing interview aired the night before. Same tactic as Trump any time a new actual scandal came out he would just say something outrageous to distract from the real crimes he was committing.	/r/MensRights	15/10/21 06:40 PM
2	Hooked up at the party but she left with her friends after she said yes when I told her I’m taking her home “Pull” is exclusively a British term. No one else uses that and thus most places there is not a distinct meaning to “hook up.” I have always taken it to mean anything beyond making out, but it means different things to different people. I have also heard “pull” used by Brits to mean making out and nothing more (I witnessed what happened as well, so there was no confusion there). So it seems that “pull” is just as convoluted as “hook up.”	/r/seduction	15/10/21 06:36 PM
1	proper way to ask her out? Next time you two say hi to each other just stop her and say something like “hey listen, I know we always say hi when we see each other but I’d love to have an actual conversation and get to know you. Would you want to grab a coffee or a drink with me sometime?” Allow for a little back and forth conversation so it’s not transactional, take her number if she says yes, politely accept if it’s a no and keep things friendly “no worries, it was worth a shot. I’ll see you around,” and then go about yo…	/r/seduction	16/08/21 02:23 PM
2	How do I get girls as a conservative white male You’re not living in reality if you deny that people who look different are treated differently. It’s literally juman nature, and that’s why it’s taken so long to try to move ost tribalism in multiethnic societies.	/r/seduction	01/07/21 10:58 AM
1	Not fapping just helped my finger pull the trigger You might want to do some soul searching. Two different people are pointing out that what you said is extremely problematic. But if it makes you feel better to think that we don’t know what we’re talking about and you do, then have fun not growing as a person. There’s several really valuable lessons to be learned here in the flaws in your “thinking” that we pointed out that would benefit you greatly. Please stop being defensive and look into it. Women aren’t inherently submissive, “feminine” isn…	/r/seduction	26/06/21 12:39 AM
0	Not fapping just helped my finger pull the trigger You might want to look up the definition of stereotype. Then look up the definition of misogyny. You are lumping all women into a single category and it’s a negative one. And your excuse is “experience” which is just YOUR experience interpreted by YOUR brain that is apparently overrun my misogynistic stereotypes. YOUR limited life experience viewed through YOUR own limited point of view does not make your OPINIONS universal truth. You do not love women at all if you view them in the negative and…	/r/seduction	25/06/21 10:27 PM
-10	Not fapping just helped my finger pull the trigger No, you don’t. You lust after them. But you clearly don’t respect them as equals if you think of feminine and submissive as the same thing. That’s some “barefoot and pregnant” “make me a sandwich” “foot binding” level of misogyny. You really need to re-examine the negative stereotypes you’re applying to an entire gender and why.	/r/seduction	25/06/21 06:48 PM
1	To me, it feels like I can only approach a girl if we meet in a place where that's "socially acceptable", be it at a bar, work or school. How do you approach a girl who's just trying to mind her own business that you met at some random coffee shop? Interesting theories. Good luck to you.	/r/seduction	03/06/21 03:00 PM
1	To me, it feels like I can only approach a girl if we meet in a place where that's "socially acceptable", be it at a bar, work or school. How do you approach a girl who's just trying to mind her own business that you met at some random coffee shop? A lot of guys make the mistake of trying to impress girls to stand out and end up talking at them and not with them. Girls want to see you taking an active interest in them, not make them question if you might be a narcissist. You have ti fight the urge to show off to them, which is a huge turnoff, and trust that your calm, cool, and collected quiet confidence will be more than enough (they find this a huge turn on). You don’t need to brag if you’re actually great. Doing so makes it seem like yo…	/r/seduction	03/06/21 02:56 PM
1	To me, it feels like I can only approach a girl if we meet in a place where that's "socially acceptable", be it at a bar, work or school. How do you approach a girl who's just trying to mind her own business that you met at some random coffee shop? I would start by saying hi, introducing yourself and asking their name. Then say something like “I couldn’t help but notice we were making eye contact so I figured I’d just come over and say hi and see if there was any kind of connection.” Then ask them questions about themselves and see if you have anything in common. If you hit it off ask for their number or their social media so you can message them. Send them a message the next day and keep the convo going for a bit before trying to make pla…	/r/seduction	03/06/21 02:52 AM
1	To me, it feels like I can only approach a girl if we meet in a place where that's "socially acceptable", be it at a bar, work or school. How do you approach a girl who's just trying to mind her own business that you met at some random coffee shop? How’s your life going? Still angry as all hell for no reason and wasting your time desperately trying to insult someone you don’t know on the internet? You sure you can’t do anything better with that time? Like grow and mature into a better person than you are currently?	/r/seduction	03/06/21 02:44 AM
1	To me, it feels like I can only approach a girl if we meet in a place where that's "socially acceptable", be it at a bar, work or school. How do you approach a girl who's just trying to mind her own business that you met at some random coffee shop? Cool. Keep spending your time spewing your angry ignorance at strangers on the internet. I’ll just be over here enjoying my life and helping others enjoy theirs. Good luck to you.	/r/seduction	02/06/21 09:32 PM
1	To me, it feels like I can only approach a girl if we meet in a place where that's "socially acceptable", be it at a bar, work or school. How do you approach a girl who's just trying to mind her own business that you met at some random coffee shop? I wasn’t selling it to you. You need self awareness and openness to personal growth to pick up what I’m putting down. You’re not my target demographic.	/r/seduction	02/06/21 08:52 PM
1	To me, it feels like I can only approach a girl if we meet in a place where that's "socially acceptable", be it at a bar, work or school. How do you approach a girl who's just trying to mind her own business that you met at some random coffee shop? I totally agree. I never said you shouldn’t approach women during the day or in unlikely places. I used to pick women up on the street during the day ALL THE TIME. Anyone who would make prolonged or repeat eye contact would get chatted up by me. And my female friends said they always wished this would happen to them. The only difference is that I was the guy who would do something about it. That’s not new either. You can go back decades of people giving advice to talk to women during the day and…	/r/seduction	02/06/21 06:46 PM
1	To me, it feels like I can only approach a girl if we meet in a place where that's "socially acceptable", be it at a bar, work or school. How do you approach a girl who's just trying to mind her own business that you met at some random coffee shop? Hahahahaha. Oh man. Not only do I do it in real life, and incredibly successfully (I’ve dated models and my life is basically porn), but I teach it as well. Tried to give you a free lesson, but go ahead and think you know best.	/r/seduction	02/06/21 06:38 PM
4	To me, it feels like I can only approach a girl if we meet in a place where that's "socially acceptable", be it at a bar, work or school. How do you approach a girl who's just trying to mind her own business that you met at some random coffee shop? Walking around shopping and socializing with a friend is extremely different than burying your head in a book or having your headphones in your ears or being on the phone. Please re-read my previous statement. I specifically said to look for signs that she wants to be left alone. I never said you shouldn’t approach someone who’s socializing in public. That is literally the exact opposite scenario and yes, a good time to say hi and start a conversation.	/r/seduction	02/06/21 02:46 PM
2	To me, it feels like I can only approach a girl if we meet in a place where that's "socially acceptable", be it at a bar, work or school. How do you approach a girl who's just trying to mind her own business that you met at some random coffee shop? Girls don’t tend to react in that confrontational way because men can get violent and they are small and vulnerable. So they just play it off and let you down gently as best they can to get out of that uncomfortable situation. Every single female friend I have and every girl I’ve dated universally say this is a problem. Go ahead and Google it. You’ll find dozens of articles that have gone viral saying the same. But go ahead and say that you know better just because you haven’t been stabbed yet f…	/r/seduction	02/06/21 02:43 PM
6	To me, it feels like I can only approach a girl if we meet in a place where that's "socially acceptable", be it at a bar, work or school. How do you approach a girl who's just trying to mind her own business that you met at some random coffee shop? No, sometimes they just want to be left alone. This isn’t a Disney movie, they’re real people. You’re working off of old/outdated stereotypes. I have dozens of female friends and a very successful dating life. This sentiment is universal. Do not interrupt them when they’re trying to be alone. It’s rude and selfish. Doesn’t matter who you are. People get stressed out and need their personal space/time. Give it to them.	/r/seduction	02/06/21 02:39 PM
155	To me, it feels like I can only approach a girl if we meet in a place where that's "socially acceptable", be it at a bar, work or school. How do you approach a girl who's just trying to mind her own business that you met at some random coffee shop? Always pay attention to signs that they are trying to be left alone. Is she reading a book? On the phone? Does she have her headphones in her ears? Don’t bother her or interrupt her. The comment above is gold: if there’s sustained or repeated eye contact shoot your shot every time.	/r/seduction	01/06/21 04:13 PM
1	Rush Limbaugh displays the tiniest glimmer of sadness over dying from cancer and is berated for doing so. Men should be able to express their emotions, and being socially demonized by doing so even when faced with your own death is a problem. https://www.salon.com/2019/08/28/right-wing-journalist-andy-ngo-outed-video-shows-him-hanging-out-with-far-right-hate-group/ https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nationalmemo.com/amp/undercover-video-exposes-far-right-journalist-andy-ngo-2645298707	/r/MensRights	30/11/20 06:49 PM
3	When you accept a flaw and remain confident despite it, more attraction can be generated than if you lacked the so called flaw altogether. I definitely know short and/or chubby dudes with great personalities (funny, friendly, etc.) who have no problem getting with girls because of it. Learning to laugh at yourself or not let things get to you is super attractive. Self-assuredness is sexy.	/r/seduction	20/11/20 08:20 PM
1	Rush Limbaugh displays the tiniest glimmer of sadness over dying from cancer and is berated for doing so. Men should be able to express their emotions, and being socially demonized by doing so even when faced with your own death is a problem. No, Asians aren’t known to be active meme ers of white supremacy groups. Andy Ngo is. And the piece you linked to called James O’Keefe the greatest journalist of our time, which is both so sad and also laughable and shows how incredibly delusional right wing America is. But yeah, solid “news” source. Your entire ethos is a circle jerk of disinformation to justify your easily disproven beliefs.	/r/MensRights	20/11/20 02:14 PM
-28	My family's response to the Men's Day infographic. How would you guys have responded to them? 95% of Black murder victims are killed by Black people. 91% of white murder victims are killed by white people. The difference between black on black and white on white murder varies between 4-7% any given year. That is a stark contrast between 97% of all murderers being men vs 3% women. 4-7% difference vs 94% difference.	/r/MensRights	20/11/20 01:59 PM
-25	My family's response to the Men's Day infographic. How would you guys have responded to them? She didn’t say “more criminal” she said “more likely to have a prior record” which is true. Also, Black people make up a majority of the prison population DESPITE white people committing more crime and most violent crimes. Black people do not commit more crimes than white people numbers wise, they just get much worse sentences than whites. So no, that discrimination is not shared across all men. Edit: people wanted me to do their homework for them so here it is. As for the prior record gap, it’s…	/r/MensRights	20/11/20 01:35 PM
-68	My family's response to the Men's Day infographic. How would you guys have responded to them? But white on white crime is almost the exact same rate. So the black on black crime is just a racist trope to make it sound like blacks are more violent towards each other when really it’s just that people assault and kill people they know. Meanwhile, men make up 97% of all murderers. Females are 3%. So this argument doesn’t work.	/r/MensRights	20/11/20 01:18 PM
1	Rush Limbaugh displays the tiniest glimmer of sadness over dying from cancer and is berated for doing so. Men should be able to express their emotions, and being socially demonized by doing so even when faced with your own death is a problem. You tried to delegitimize my sources, but linked to an article of nonsense propaganda that’s opening line is “James O’Keefe is the greatest journalist of our time.” James O’Keefe is a serial liar, and a bad one at that since he keeps getting caught and winding up in legal trouble for it. And that article quotes Andy Ngo, a “journalist” that no respectable publication will employ because of his ties to white supremecist groups and a penchant for blatantly making shit up. Thanks for showing what y…	/r/MensRights	18/11/20 05:37 PM
1	Rush Limbaugh displays the tiniest glimmer of sadness over dying from cancer and is berated for doing so. Men should be able to express their emotions, and being socially demonized by doing so even when faced with your own death is a problem. You realize president is ahead of VP, right? You are assigning Obama’s decisions to him, and nothing in your previous comments refuted that. As for how Limbaugh’s comments lead to right wing violence and extremist group recruitment: https://www.google.com/amp/s/m.huffpost.com/us/entry/100586/amp As for the FBI clearing Anti-Fa of the blame right wingers are trying to shift on to them that we’re really caused by right wing hate groups: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ajc.com/news/fbi-finds-evide…	/r/MensRights	18/11/20 04:04 PM
1	Rush Limbaugh displays the tiniest glimmer of sadness over dying from cancer and is berated for doing so. Men should be able to express their emotions, and being socially demonized by doing so even when faced with your own death is a problem. Biden didn’t preside over any bombings or genocides. Those were Obama’s and Bush’s calls. You’re both robbing Biden of credit for things he has directly responsible for (overseeing our economic recovery and the violence against women act) while simultaneously pushing the blame onto him for things that weren’t his decisions. That’s completely mis-attributing blame and responsibility. Biden also has no connection to anti-fa or anyone on the extreme left, who also have been cleared of any and all b…	/r/MensRights	16/11/20 06:04 PM
1	Rush Limbaugh displays the tiniest glimmer of sadness over dying from cancer and is berated for doing so. Men should be able to express their emotions, and being socially demonized by doing so even when faced with your own death is a problem. So Obama’s decisions are now Biden’s to take the credit/blame for, but Biden also gets zero credit for the committees/programs/bills that he actually oversaw as senator and VP? You are more than grasping at straws here. If you want to know the damage that Rush Limbaugh has caused, just look at the rise in right wing propaganda in this country and the violence and chaos that has resulted. He’s as responsible as Rupert Murdoch for unleashing the Alex Jones’, and Q Anons, and other racist/misogynis…	/r/MensRights	16/11/20 02:37 PM
0	Five reasons why there are more men than women in prisons plus one reason you haven't thought of (traumatic brain injuries, that is). I really hope you’re being sarcastic and not an incredibly delusional person.	/r/MensRights	15/11/20 06:12 PM
2	Rush Limbaugh displays the tiniest glimmer of sadness over dying from cancer and is berated for doing so. Men should be able to express their emotions, and being socially demonized by doing so even when faced with your own death is a problem. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/presidential-medal-awardee-rush-limbaughs-racist-and-sexist-comments-2020-2%3famp	/r/MensRights	14/11/20 04:49 AM
1	Rush Limbaugh displays the tiniest glimmer of sadness over dying from cancer and is berated for doing so. Men should be able to express their emotions, and being socially demonized by doing so even when faced with your own death is a problem. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/presidential-medal-awardee-rush-limbaughs-racist-and-sexist-comments-2020-2%3famp It’s not blind faith when there’s ample evidence. It’s literally the opposite. Who’s in the echo chamber? Rush is a vile racist. Also, Ben Shapiro self-owns on the regular. He only comes across as smart by people who are easily fooled by oversimplification and platitudes.	/r/MensRights	14/11/20 03:52 AM
1	Rush Limbaugh displays the tiniest glimmer of sadness over dying from cancer and is berated for doing so. Men should be able to express their emotions, and being socially demonized by doing so even when faced with your own death is a problem. Not equivalent. Not even close. Biden has also done a lot of good, like manage the economic recovery act that kept millions out of poverty and rescued our economy, or sponsoring the violence against women act to prevent domestic violence. Please name any amount of good that Rush did that helped millions of people or in any way offset the detriment he caused to our society.	/r/MensRights	13/11/20 10:04 PM
-1	Rush Limbaugh displays the tiniest glimmer of sadness over dying from cancer and is berated for doing so. Men should be able to express their emotions, and being socially demonized by doing so even when faced with your own death is a problem. He’s a vile racist who spews and spreads hate of all kinds. He has contributed very little good and a whole lot of evil to the world. Doesn’t matter who he votes for or endorses. The man is evil and has made the country and the world a worse place because if his actions, and he deserves to have his own horrible comments haunt him wherever he goes, including to the grave and beyond.	/r/MensRights	13/11/20 04:27 PM
1	Five reasons why there are more men than women in prisons plus one reason you haven't thought of (traumatic brain injuries, that is). First off, god doesn’t exist. But if you’re going to make a religious argument like abortion is murder as opposed to induced miscarriage then you have to take that argument to it’s logical conclusion. And the 97% statistic isn’t an argument. It’s mathematical proof. It’s reality. And arguing against it is arguing against reality itself.	/r/MensRights	10/11/20 05:56 AM
1	Five reasons why there are more men than women in prisons plus one reason you haven't thought of (traumatic brain injuries, that is). You admit that you can’t understand simple statements like “men commit more crime and that’s why more men are in prison,” but I’M the one who has trouble thinking... you sure you don’t have that backwards?	/r/MensRights	08/11/20 07:33 PM
1	Five reasons why there are more men than women in prisons plus one reason you haven't thought of (traumatic brain injuries, that is). Since you’re too lazy to Google it: https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2012/crime-in-the-u.s.-2012/tables/42tabledatadecoverviewpdf/table_42_arrests_by_sex_2012.xls	/r/MensRights	08/11/20 08:28 AM
1	Five reasons why there are more men than women in prisons plus one reason you haven't thought of (traumatic brain injuries, that is). Men don’t commit 97% of murder because they are discriminated against. Your explanations are distractions and excuses. More men are in prison because men commit more crimes. You don’t have to get into psychology if you don’t want to, and it’s totally counterproductive to devolve into weird anecdotal diatribes about our own individual lived experiences and legal/political systems we live under. But you’re not changing the direct causality of men committing a majority of crimes and thus make up a …	/r/MensRights	08/11/20 08:12 AM
2	Five reasons why there are more men than women in prisons plus one reason you haven't thought of (traumatic brain injuries, that is). Hahaha. “The truth.” Please provide a single shred if evidence that this is true and then we can talk. You’re just making up wild conspiracy theories and then acting as if I’m being the irrational one.	/r/MensRights	08/11/20 07:41 AM
1	Five reasons why there are more men than women in prisons plus one reason you haven't thought of (traumatic brain injuries, that is). Yeah, it can’t possibly be that men are actually committing those murders. It must be detectives are fucking up, but only on the cases involving a woman. And then not only catching the wrong person, but the wrong person they pin it on is always a guy every single time. Yeah. That wild conspiracy theory involving the incomplete ace and/or complicity of every local police department in the entire world is so much more believable than the possibility that men make up 97% of all murderers. And you d…	/r/MensRights	08/11/20 07:26 AM
1	Five reasons why there are more men than women in prisons plus one reason you haven't thought of (traumatic brain injuries, that is). Hahaha. Your entire argument is based on a false premise/equivalence. You’re literally incorrect. Go ahead and check out “Homicide Statistics by Gender” on Wikipedia: “A 2013 global study on homicide by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime found that men accounted for about 96 percent of all homicide perpetrators worldwide.” [2] [2] Gibbons, Jonathan (2013). "Global Study on Homicide" (PDF). www.unodc.org. United National Office of Drugs and Crime (Vienna). It varied year to year so you’…	/r/MensRights	08/11/20 07:10 AM
1	80% of you aren't going to get anywhere because of this Seduction skills aren’t inherently misogynistic. And I never said that. And you claiming I did is a cop out for you. But the portrayal of women on this thread definitely is misogynistic, even if you mean no harm.	/r/seduction	07/11/20 07:43 PM
2	Five reasons why there are more men than women in prisons plus one reason you haven't thought of (traumatic brain injuries, that is). Are you’ll trying to claim that a majority, or even a significant portion, if male violence is because women directed/asked them to do it? That is beyond ridiculous and a wild grasp at straws to try to reverse the blame from men into women.	/r/MensRights	07/11/20 07:29 PM
1	80% of you aren't going to get anywhere because of this I just don’t feel like taking the time and energy to educate you. You can find out for yourself if you want why using negative gender stereotypes is bad and how to be better about it moving forward.	/r/seduction	07/11/20 07:27 PM
1	Five reasons why there are more men than women in prisons plus one reason you haven't thought of (traumatic brain injuries, that is). No, it’s like explaining the distribution of alcohol consumption distribution by citing alcoholism (which makes up a vast majority of all consumption of alcoholic beverages). I didn’t address the rest of your reasons for why men commit most crime because it omitted that basic premise and is an attempt to explain it away without naming the actual problem and you were essentially absolving men for their responsibility in being overly violent and trying to blame it on purely external factors. If yo…	/r/MensRights	07/11/20 06:32 PM
1	80% of you aren't going to get anywhere because of this A lot of what you said is just plain outdated. “I don’t understand how that’s misogynistic at all.” Maybe take the time to look into it instead of continuing to defend your statements then.	/r/seduction	07/11/20 05:56 PM
1	Five reasons why there are more men than women in prisons plus one reason you haven't thought of (traumatic brain injuries, that is). Men make up 97% of all murderers. Not all gender discrepancies are a result of discrimination. Some are self-inflicted. You can find similar stats on all violent crime, drug related crime, robberies, etc. in every country on earth. Men commit more crime than women. That’s why more men are in jail. Harsher sentencing might exacerbate that a little, but not enough to make up for the discrepancy when you look at the overall crime stats.	/r/MensRights	07/11/20 03:30 PM
-2	80% of you aren't going to get anywhere because of this No, I definitely understand. You’re just confused, so your best efforts to explain it to me fall short. Misogyny is definitely what you’re talking about. The scenario you described is of you having misogynistic beliefs. Not trying to hate, trying to educate. You were describing assertiveness. You gave assertiveness gender roles when it has none. That is misogyny.	/r/seduction	07/11/20 12:21 AM
-3	80% of you aren't going to get anywhere because of this What you said is textbook misogyny, though I don’t think you’re doing it maliciously. When you say “male energy” and “female energy” you’re just talking about assertiveness. That doesn’t have a gender. Even if you were talking about a Dom/sub situation, while men tend to be dominant that’s still not a given. But you called me ignorant based on an opinion, which is not a lack of knowledge. Meanwhile, your description of gender role stereotypes is pretty ignorant.	/r/seduction	07/11/20 12:03 AM
2	80% of you aren't going to get anywhere because of this I agree that men benefit by becoming the ones who women chase instead of constantly pursuing. But allowing someone else to take the lead doesn’t make you a follower. It might just be poor word choice, but you said “women are followers” which doesn’t leave a lot of room for confident, assertive women. Or are you just pretending that baddies aren’t a thing? It sounds like you’re playing into old misogynistic stereotypes of cunning predator and hapless prey.	/r/seduction	06/11/20 11:58 PM
-3	80% of you aren't going to get anywhere because of this “Women are followers.” GREAT TIP! There’s nothing that women love more than blatant misogyny. Taking a dismissive, disrespectful attitude towards people you’re interacting with is always the best way to win them over. /s The rest of what you said has some value. But that was trash. You are part of the problem if you really believe that.	/r/seduction	06/11/20 06:46 PM
12	I really can't stand negging Don’t neg women. Don’t do it. It’s not just evil, it’s a less effective strategy than just being genuine, interested/interesting, clever, fun, and flirty. Compliments done correctly are much more effective. So does being a good guy (not a nice guy) vs being an asshole. It also doesn’t work long term as you are shattering the confidence if someone you could date instead of uplifting them, which is a much better long term strategy. Even if you don’t plan on dating them, word will get around that y…	/r/seduction	02/11/20 07:04 PM
2	10 Simple Lines to Introduce Flirting and Teasing Fair. I know some people are better at picking up on and playing off of other people’s social cues. However, going off of a template instead of catering your conversation to the individual you’re talking to is a recipe for disaster. Picking up women isn’t paint by numbers. Lines don’t work, formulas don’t work... genuine conversation, demonstrating interest in the person you’re talking to, trying to get to know them, and trying to have a laugh and a fun time are the only way to really be success…	/r/seduction	27/10/20 08:51 PM
-2	10 Simple Lines to Introduce Flirting and Teasing This is terrible advice at its core. Lines don’t work. It’s disingenuous to try to find ways to insert scripted lines into a conversation and most people can pick up on it when you do it since it seems forced (because it is). It’s cheesy and stunts conversational flow. You’re better off just having a real conversation with someone and letting the clever dialogue come to you in the flow of the back and forth banter.	/r/seduction	27/10/20 03:06 PM
13	Amber Heard abused Johnny Depp and L’Oréal just made her a spokesperson. This is not female empowerment this is repulsive. They did not just make her a spokesperson. They’ve had a contract with her since 2018 before her crimes were revealed. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/loreal-paris-announces-amber-heard-as-new-global-spokesperson-300646845.html HOWEVER, they have had plenty of time to cancel their partnership with her now that the evidence has come to light that she abused Jonny Depp and they have not done so. But if you take a look at the comments on their Twitter announcement for this campaign, you ca…	/r/MensRights	28/05/20 03:09 PM
1	Feminists need to understand I read your words. You didn’t read mine. But it’s a dead end trying to have a civil discussion with someone who’s very aggressively willfully ignorant so I’m going to stop wasting my time.	/r/MensRights	20/05/20 12:20 AM
1	Feminists need to understand Hahaha. Lather? Frothing at the mouth? I was perfectly calm while responding to you. On top of that, I was even complimentary towards you. On the other hand, you just told me to fuck myself in the middle of your tantrum. Not sure how you possibly got aggression from anything I wrote, but you’re clearly very skilled at mental gymnastics if you both thought my measured response to your laughably ridiculous comparisons (I actually thought you were just playing devils advocate) was rabidly aggressiv…	/r/MensRights	19/05/20 11:14 PM
1	Feminists need to understand There is a massive difference between wild conspiracy theories and over 2 dozen “alleged” victims coming forward each with at least some evidence or corroboration from others about their stories. Obama has a Hawaiian birth certificate. No evidence has ever been produced linking the Clintons to drug running. One of the main pizza parlors in question didn’t even have a basement when some nut job who believed these baseless allegations broke in with a gun to free the non-existent child slaves. So w…	/r/MensRights	19/05/20 10:46 PM
1	They lived in a factory for 28 days to make millions of pounds of raw PPE materials to help fight coronavirus \| Just 43 men using their "toxic masculinity" to help save lives. First off, there is plenty of research into the privilege of men over women. There are vast teams of economic and social data that prove that men get better treatment in a variety of individual aspects of our society economically, politically, legally, and socially. To claim otherwise is willful ignorance or just disingenuous. So you revealing your obvious bias and intentional blind spots and reimagining if history and the present completely disqualifies everything you said after, but I’ll indul…	/r/MensRights	19/05/20 02:50 PM
0	They lived in a factory for 28 days to make millions of pounds of raw PPE materials to help fight coronavirus \| Just 43 men using their "toxic masculinity" to help save lives. Title IX has literally nothing to do with this story. You’re grasping at straws so badly that you have to go completely off topic to do so. Feminists don’t have anything to do with this story. This is just a story of men doing good deeds. No one is calling them toxic or saying anything bad about these men or manhood and the men themselves aren’t trying to claim victimhood or be martyrs. You are just looking for fuel for your crusade and there is none here to be had so you have to inject other pe…	/r/MensRights	19/05/20 02:31 PM
0	Feminists need to understand 25 women have publicly stated that he assaulted or raped them and that they did not let him do it, he just forced himself on them. And those are just the ones who have come forward. So yes, his statement is an admission of serial assault while also stating that he can get away with it because he’s rich and famous, because up to that point he had gotten away with all of his assaults and rapes consequence-free.	/r/MensRights	19/05/20 02:18 PM
1	Feminists need to understand Sure. It gets used as a defense frequently: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/24257791_Boys_Will_Be_Boys_and_Other_Gendered_Accounts_An_Exploration_of_Victims'_Excuses_and_Justifications_for_Unwanted_Sexual_Contact_and_Coercion	/r/MensRights	19/05/20 02:06 PM
-17	Feminists need to understand No, people constantly try to use that as an excuse for assault and harassment. “Just boys being boys” “they didn’t mean anything by it,” “stop being so uptight.” This isn’t a rare event at all, it’s an extremely common response when men are caught violating other people’s sense of bodily autonomy and are trying to avoid getting in trouble for it. It’s like when the president admitted to assaulting women on tape and then dismissed it as “locker room talk.”	/r/MensRights	02/05/20 09:32 PM
0	They lived in a factory for 28 days to make millions of pounds of raw PPE materials to help fight coronavirus \| Just 43 men using their "toxic masculinity" to help save lives. 2 things: 1) Nothing they did was inherent to masculinity. 2) they said they were happy to do it. It was not harmful to them either in the short term or the long term according to them. I’m not ignoring anything. You are ignoring their own words and sentiments and putting your words in their mouths while also trying to apply a term that doesn’t apply here to this situation. The “they chose it” is important because the only way toxic masculinity could possibly apply here is if they were bullied i…	/r/MensRights	01/05/20 07:31 PM
0	They lived in a factory for 28 days to make millions of pounds of raw PPE materials to help fight coronavirus \| Just 43 men using their "toxic masculinity" to help save lives. They chose it. No one harmed them. They chose to do this, and were compensated extra bonus pay for it (including while they slept) and were made to feel as comfortable as possible including being fed filet mignon and bringing their Xbox’s and TVs and corn hole to keep them entertained. And they said they were happy to do it. Yes, they said they missed their families, but they chose to isolate them specifically to ensure their families didn’t get sick l, and then said it was worth it to help out.…	/r/MensRights	01/05/20 06:56 PM
0	They lived in a factory for 28 days to make millions of pounds of raw PPE materials to help fight coronavirus \| Just 43 men using their "toxic masculinity" to help save lives. No it didn’t and no they weren’t. Stop putting words in their mouth. “We were just happy to be able to help,” Boyce, an operations shift supervisor and a 27-year veteran at Braskem America, told The Washington Post. “We’ve been getting messages on social media from nurses, doctors, EMS workers, saying thank you for what we’re doing. But we want to thank them for what they did and are continuing to do. That’s what made the time we were in there go by quickly, just being able to support them.” “It…	/r/MensRights	01/05/20 05:26 PM
1	They lived in a factory for 28 days to make millions of pounds of raw PPE materials to help fight coronavirus \| Just 43 men using their "toxic masculinity" to help save lives. No, it’s whether it not it harms men. Like being pressured into burying your stress or depression and “man up” or “quit being a pussy” or a “little girl” or a “bitch” instead of opening up about your feelings because that behavior causes further trauma. That is taking traditional masculinity like toughness too far to the point that it hurts that man and men in general. It has nothing to do with feminists and no one benefits from it.	/r/MensRights	01/05/20 04:55 PM
0	They lived in a factory for 28 days to make millions of pounds of raw PPE materials to help fight coronavirus \| Just 43 men using their "toxic masculinity" to help save lives. In case you've forgotten your own definition: The actual definition is if it is toxic to a man’s mental or physical health But there’s nothing inherently masculine about it. A toxic situation is a toxic situation. Toxic masculinity specifically denotes that the levels of traditional masculinity are causing the toxicity. This isn’t toxic MASCULINITY. This is just something that’s potentially harmful, or toxic in your words, and even then I and seemingly they themselves would argue that it isn’t. …	/r/MensRights	01/05/20 04:45 PM
1	They lived in a factory for 28 days to make millions of pounds of raw PPE materials to help fight coronavirus \| Just 43 men using their "toxic masculinity" to help save lives. “Yes, they volunteered to be Toxically Masculine. We've already established that.” No. You are misusing that term. Toxic masculinity is a form of bullying, sometimes internalized. What these men did is positive masculinity. Stop trying to put a square peg into a round hole. Your definition is both incorrect and does not apply to this situation where men showed kindness and compassion for others and worked hard toward a greater good. Nothing about that is toxic.	/r/MensRights	01/05/20 04:20 PM
0	They lived in a factory for 28 days to make millions of pounds of raw PPE materials to help fight coronavirus \| Just 43 men using their "toxic masculinity" to help save lives. I guess that’s for them to decide if they felt societal pressure or internal pressure and if so why, OR if they were doing it out of kindness and compassion.	/r/MensRights	01/05/20 04:05 PM
0	They lived in a factory for 28 days to make millions of pounds of raw PPE materials to help fight coronavirus \| Just 43 men using their "toxic masculinity" to help save lives. Further background info on the guidelines from a few different articles that put the APÁ guidelines in layman’s terms: “research showed that “some masculine social norms can have negative consequences for the health of boys and men,” the APA said in a statement released January 14. Key among these harmful norms is pressure for boys to suppress their emotions (the “common ‘boys don’t cry’ refrain”), the APA said. This has been documented to lead to “increased negative risk-taking and inappropriat…	/r/MensRights	01/05/20 03:53 PM
0	They lived in a factory for 28 days to make millions of pounds of raw PPE materials to help fight coronavirus \| Just 43 men using their "toxic masculinity" to help save lives. Yes, volunteered, not pressured. If someone called them a “pussy” or “sissy” or told them to “man up” or “tough it out” for not wanting to do it then THAT is toxic masculinity. Volunteering to help others out of the kindness of your heart is altruism and charity, not toxic masculinity. You are attempting to champion these men, who are not asking for sympathy or trying to prove any point, as martyrs for your “cause” that you are trying to force on them by co-opting their charity.	/r/MensRights	01/05/20 03:38 PM
0	They lived in a factory for 28 days to make millions of pounds of raw PPE materials to help fight coronavirus \| Just 43 men using their "toxic masculinity" to help save lives. No one is dismissing them, I’m dismissing your attempt to co-opt their efforts for your agenda. These men volunteered for this. No one forced them or pressured them. And they’re not looking for sympathy, let alone your attempt to martyr them. They volunteered to put in some hard work to help others in need. And if they develop mental health issues as a result of this then they should confide in loved ones and seek out mental health professionals to help them get through it. If any of those loved…	/r/MensRights	01/05/20 02:49 PM
1	They lived in a factory for 28 days to make millions of pounds of raw PPE materials to help fight coronavirus \| Just 43 men using their "toxic masculinity" to help save lives. “Expected” is like “required” but with social standards and social pressure as the enforcers instead of legally being bound to or forced to. What things are you shamed for or otherwise penalized for socially if you don’t live up to it?	/r/MensRights	01/05/20 02:36 PM
0	They lived in a factory for 28 days to make millions of pounds of raw PPE materials to help fight coronavirus \| Just 43 men using their "toxic masculinity" to help save lives. As the APA, all they’re saying is that taking traditional masculinity too far can be unhealthy. And that’s true. For example: men suffer all kinds of physical health issues because our diet is too meat-heavy, much of which is due to pressure from other men to eat like a cave man and not eat “girlie” things like salad, or giving other guys a hard time for watching their weight and watching what they eat because that’s “gay.” To some men taking any amount of care for yourself physically is somehow…	/r/MensRights	01/05/20 02:23 PM
1	They lived in a factory for 28 days to make millions of pounds of raw PPE materials to help fight coronavirus \| Just 43 men using their "toxic masculinity" to help save lives. First of all, don’t let the extremist outliers represent the while in your mind. It is a very small percentage of feminists who hate men. The term feminist literally means for the EQUALITY of the sexes, aka women treated equally to men. Yes, there are some extremists who hate men. Just like there are very a small number of black people who hate white people when almost all black people just want to just be treated equally and have equal opportunity. Almost all LGBT people don’t hate straight peo…	/r/MensRights	01/05/20 02:13 PM
1	They lived in a factory for 28 days to make millions of pounds of raw PPE materials to help fight coronavirus \| Just 43 men using their "toxic masculinity" to help save lives. Ok,so you were making a separate point entirely. The subject we’re discussing isn’t the difficult jobs of and potential PTSD for firefighters, police, or EMTs m, or military. We’re specifically talking about these factory workers here in this situation and how “toxic masculinity” doesn’t apply to this situation in any way.	/r/MensRights	01/05/20 01:59 PM
0	They lived in a factory for 28 days to make millions of pounds of raw PPE materials to help fight coronavirus \| Just 43 men using their "toxic masculinity" to help save lives. Read the article. “No one told them they had to do it, Braskem America CEO Mark Nikolich said. All of the workers volunteered.” They chose to take on a difficult task. No one hartases them about “manning up” or “stop being a pussy” or to “tough it out” or hazed then ir harassed them in any way. They chose to take on a difficult task for the benefit of others and were presided for their efforts, not bullied into them and throughout. This does not even come anywhere close to the definition of toxi…	/r/MensRights	01/05/20 01:47 PM
0	They lived in a factory for 28 days to make millions of pounds of raw PPE materials to help fight coronavirus \| Just 43 men using their "toxic masculinity" to help save lives. If they were doing those hours as a full-time permanent job, yes. But there’s nothing specific to male behavior about that, it’s just job stress. You clearly don’t know what toxic masculinity is. If they developed mental health issues because they were being hazed, or harassed, or routinely told to “man up” and “tough it out” by male coworkers or bosses after mentioning that they were developing mental health issues then THAT is toxic masculinity. Working long hours is just working long hours.	/r/MensRights	01/05/20 01:23 PM
1	They lived in a factory for 28 days to make millions of pounds of raw PPE materials to help fight coronavirus \| Just 43 men using their "toxic masculinity" to help save lives. Uh, hard no. That’s ridiculous. Is everyone who doesn’t do it shamed for not doing it? Or fined? Or in some other way penalized for not doing what’s “expected?” No. Because it’s not expected. It’s a nice thing to do that’s going beyond what’s expected, it’s EXTRA-ordinary on the part of the person doing it, it is not expected or required at all.	/r/MensRights	01/05/20 02:41 AM
0	They lived in a factory for 28 days to make millions of pounds of raw PPE materials to help fight coronavirus \| Just 43 men using their "toxic masculinity" to help save lives. Those jobs are very different than working in a factory for long hours and sleeping there for a few days/weeks. All of those jobs are exposing you to trauma and other people’s trauma, and that can be very damaging. But the jobs themselves have nothing to do with toxic masculinity. If you want to say that there are toxic environments within those jobs that involve superiors or colleagues that exhibit harassing behavior, hazing, creating a code of silence and telling traumatized coworkers to “man …	/r/MensRights	30/04/20 08:51 PM
-2	They lived in a factory for 28 days to make millions of pounds of raw PPE materials to help fight coronavirus \| Just 43 men using their "toxic masculinity" to help save lives. No. For so many reasons. Taking on a difficult task for the benefit of others is not going to give them PTSD or anger issues or any other mental health condition. It’s a difficult task, but not anything that will cause lasting harmful effects. If anything it will probably be beneficial to them as it’s shown that engaging in charitable causes and caring for others boosts your own sense of well-being.	/r/MensRights	30/04/20 06:20 PM
0	They lived in a factory for 28 days to make millions of pounds of raw PPE materials to help fight coronavirus \| Just 43 men using their "toxic masculinity" to help save lives. Based on everything you said and the combatitive tone younger taking in digging in versus having a discussion about this it doesn’t seem like you’re interested in learning what’s wrong or missing from your opinion on the matter. But if I’m wrong, feel free to check this out: https://www.apa.org/about/policy/boys-men-practice-guidelines.pdf	/r/MensRights	30/04/20 06:10 PM
1	They lived in a factory for 28 days to make millions of pounds of raw PPE materials to help fight coronavirus \| Just 43 men using their "toxic masculinity" to help save lives. No. The actual definition is if it is toxic to a man’s mental or physical health. Being tough is good, being tough all the time to the point that you completely bury all of your feelings until you have uncontrollable outbursts or anger management issues or depression is toxic. It’s like too much of a good thing ends up being a bad thing.	/r/MensRights	30/04/20 05:49 PM
-1	They lived in a factory for 28 days to make millions of pounds of raw PPE materials to help fight coronavirus \| Just 43 men using their "toxic masculinity" to help save lives. No one expects that of people though. And when people choose to make an unexpected sacrifice it’s almost always appreciated, as is the case here made evident by this article celebrating their selflessness.	/r/MensRights	30/04/20 04:20 PM
1	They lived in a factory for 28 days to make millions of pounds of raw PPE materials to help fight coronavirus \| Just 43 men using their "toxic masculinity" to help save lives. No. Someone giving their time and effort for the benefit of others is charity. That is not toxic in any way. It’s not unhealthy mental or physical behavior. In fact, caring for others is an extremely healthy behavior. If someone called them a bitch or a simp or a cuck for helping others THAT would be toxic masculinity.	/r/MensRights	30/04/20 02:36 PM
1	Probably because rape isn’t the hottest bragging topic, idk? It’s a google search. It would take you 15-30 seconds. And based on your laziness and lack of initiative up to this point to find any evidence you are not worth anywhere near that pay rate.	/r/MensRights	04/03/20 03:42 PM
1	Guys says hearing both sides of the story is important and commenters rush to call him a neck beard and cringey. How is this normalized? I was always taught that both sides of any story are important No, he started his statement with “you’re probably the one to blame” which isn’t asking for both sides before deciding what happened. He’s already decided it’s her fault that she’s getting hit on at work even though she clearly doesn’t want based on her comments and he has no evidence that she did anything to encourage someone hitting on her against her wishes. The doc is being in appropriate for calling his coworker sexy. That’s over the line no matter what. So his side doesn’t matter. The moti…	/r/MensRights	04/03/20 02:21 AM
1	Probably because rape isn’t the hottest bragging topic, idk? Ok. Please provide studies and stats and evidence that refute those numbers. Prove they’re wrong. Because all you’re doing right now is saying “nuh uh!” which doesn’t refute it at all. Prove it’s bullshit.	/r/MensRights	04/03/20 01:52 AM
0	Probably because rape isn’t the hottest bragging topic, idk? Look up and down this thread. I cited multiple sources throughout for multiple points/stats, just not on this reply. Not saying you, but it’s frustrating arguing with people on the internet about easily accessible information when they could use the computer or phone that thwyMre on to google the information themselves and instead make me do it for them, usually because they’d rather not know so their pre-existing and unwavering world view would go unchallenged.	/r/MensRights	03/03/20 11:16 PM
0	Probably because rape isn’t the hottest bragging topic, idk? Yes, it’s that easy to make things up. Legit stats, made from a sample size large enough to extrapolate out, is data. Someone randomly saying “90%” is not the same as actually researching the issue and obtaining quantifiable data.	/r/MensRights	03/03/20 09:52 PM
1	Probably because rape isn’t the hottest bragging topic, idk? It’s not RAINN. There seems to be limited data on the percentage that lead to a plea deal. These articles at least walk people through the process. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.journalnow.com/news/state/sexual-assault-cases-hinge-on-evidence-gathered-by-police-nurses/article_1fe8c686-e877-59ef-9f4f-bbca2f5b2251.amp.html https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.journalnow.com/news/state/sexual-assault-cases-hinge-on-evidence-gathered-by-police-nurses/article_1fe8c686-e877-59ef-9f4f-bbca2f5b2251.amp.h…	/r/MensRights	03/03/20 05:49 PM
1	Probably because rape isn’t the hottest bragging topic, idk? Great example. You’re clearly a brilliant intellectual. You sure have this issue, and life in general, all figured out. Where are your made up “stats” to back up your claim? Come on, everyone else is doing it!!!	/r/MensRights	03/03/20 04:52 PM
-1	Probably because rape isn’t the hottest bragging topic, idk? You assumed plenty about me and what I think about this issue and claimed that I’m making things worse for victims. My 8% stat was just about rape, not including sexual assault, and I cited it. So if you want to take issue with that study, its methodology, its conclusions, fine... but that’s not what you did. You made baseless assertions about who I am and what I believe and outright inferred that I’m part of the problem. “According to FBI statistics, out of 127,258 rapes reported to police depa…	/r/MensRights	03/03/20 05:00 AM
0	Probably because rape isn’t the hottest bragging topic, idk? You’re assuming a lot and it’s literally the opposite of both my values and actual history with this issue, and the point of what I was saying. So instead of arguing with your false assumptions about who I am or your misinterpretation of what I said, I’ll just leave this here: https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/commentary/2019/09/15/why-are-we-so-bad-at-prosecuting-sexual-assault/	/r/MensRights	02/03/20 11:01 PM
-1	Probably because rape isn’t the hottest bragging topic, idk? I’ll take your word for the first stat. As for the rest, that’s not even close to accurate. There’s a variety of factors for the low conviction rate: 1) they can prove a rape happened, but not beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did it. And this happens all the time 2) rape kits need to be done immediately, which isn’t necessarily possible, and even then it’s been shown over and over again that Kira go untested by the police on a routine basis. 3) without physical evidence or witnesses …	/r/MensRights	02/03/20 10:43 PM
-2	Probably because rape isn’t the hottest bragging topic, idk? First off, don’t put words in my mouth or assume what I believe. I didn’t downplay female rapists at all. Ever. I know the prevalence of female rape against men, of the greater likelihood of female teachers to rape teen boys than male teachers raping teen girls, as well as the vast number Im of unreported male by male rape victims and male by female rape victims because of the shame of victimhood (similar to the reason behind many unreported female rape victims). That said, you’re taking all of …	/r/MensRights	02/03/20 06:21 PM
-3	Probably because rape isn’t the hottest bragging topic, idk? “Rape is a severely under-reported crime with surveys showing dark figures of up to 91.6% of rapes going unreported.” “sources, RAINN (Rape, Abuse, and Incest National Network) estimates that for every 1,000 rapes, 384 are reported to police, 57 result in an arrest, 11 are referred for prosecution, 7 result in a felony conviction, and 6 result in incarceration.” Sorry. It was .6%, not 5%. Must have been using old numbers. And yes, proof is part of the problem. Without DNA evidence (meaning the v…	/r/MensRights	02/03/20 05:51 PM
-1	Probably because rape isn’t the hottest bragging topic, idk? Statistically speaking, only 1% of reported rape claims are proven to be false. So no, I’m assuming 99% of them are telling the truth.	/r/MensRights	02/03/20 05:40 PM
-19	Probably because rape isn’t the hottest bragging topic, idk? “Most of them go to jail.” 95% of rape trials do not end in a conviction. 92% of rapes go unreported for a variety of reasons including that first statistic. So of the 8% of rapes that are even brought to police, 5% end in a conviction. You, statistically speaking, couldn’t be any more wrong.	/r/MensRights	02/03/20 01:28 PM
1	22 Women get paid $500,000 EACH for appearing in a porno; media still paints them as terrible victims with no agency I’m the moron? Read the fucking articles dumbass. The court case is spelled out plainly. I’m not a legal expert, but I can interpret basic evidence and witness testimony, not to mention the fact that you me of the defendants fled the country to escape an obvious jail sentence. Innocent people don’t run from the law. As for the amount of hate and you’re spewing, aren’t you supposed to be going your own way? You say you don’t care in one sentence, but hate is an extremely strong emotion to have. I…	/r/MGTOW	23/01/20 04:31 PM
1	22 Women get paid $500,000 EACH for appearing in a porno; media still paints them as terrible victims with no agency Good for you, you strong tough individual you. You’re so much better than these people That you can now look down on for knowing that they’re weaker or more naive than you based on your own judgement of you. As for the people involved in this criminal case: They didn’t allow the girls to read the contracts. They also didn’t allow them to leave the room, or get their plane ticket home until they agreed to do things that they originally hadn’t agreed to. In several cases they physically intimidate…	/r/MGTOW	12/01/20 04:43 PM
0	22 Women get paid $500,000 EACH for appearing in a porno; media still paints them as terrible victims with no agency Read their testimony. They weren’t allowed to read the contracts and were threatened into doing things they hadn’t agreed to. Don’t blame the victim. There are criminals in this story and it’s not the girls. Your vitriol is directed towards the wrong party. You would hate it if someone told you you were stupid for getting mugged or burgled or defrauded or otherwise victimized.	/r/MGTOW	11/01/20 08:24 PM
1	22 Women get paid $500,000 EACH for appearing in a porno; media still paints them as terrible victims with no agency No. Should, shouldn’t, whatever. There’s a market for porn. And if they do decide to do it to make money, which is a legal though non-traditional profession, the other side is still obligated to obey the law, which they didn’t. So no, it’s not at all like a loan shark. It’s like a movie production company decided to violate a bunch of laws, which is exactly what happened.	/r/MGTOW	11/01/20 08:19 PM
2	22 Women get paid $500,000 EACH for appearing in a porno; media still paints them as terrible victims with no agency Oh, ok. That’s why the camera MAN corroborated their story. Not everything can be blamed on gender bias. This is a cut and dry case of intentional fraud. Just curious, is there anything aside from gender that makes you disbelieve 20+ people who are all able to tell the same story and details independently versus the defendants, and even their lawyer, who can’t keep their story straight?	/r/MGTOW	10/01/20 10:31 PM
14	22 Women get paid $500,000 EACH for appearing in a porno; media still paints them as terrible victims with no agency The girls were repeatedly misled about the distribution of the film, what they would be asked to do on film, how long they would be filming, etc. and in some cases threatened them with non-payment or withholding their plane ticket back home if they refused to continue. Most were also forced to sign legal documents waiving their rights without being given a chance to read it. Multiple people involved have testified that this all happened and it was by design. This is textbook fraud.	/r/MGTOW	10/01/20 03:57 PM
-1	In 2011, California passed a bill prohibiting any city or county in the state from banning male infant circumcision. This is a racist lie. That is an incorrect translation that has been passed around to spread hate against Jews. Pedophilia is not allowed in Judiaism in any way.	/r/MensRights	20/10/19 01:41 PM
1	Raising all this hell because she didn't get promoted? A woman scorned..... What you described is fascism. In communism corporations would be state owned and would serve the state and the people. Fascism is the extreme of right wing capitalism where the state exists to serve the capitalist goals of private corporations.	/r/MGTOW	02/10/19 03:27 AM
4	Raising all this hell because she didn't get promoted? A woman scorned..... The amount we’d save in eliminating the FBI compared to endless and unnecessary foreign wars, the drug war, private prisons, and so many other needless and wasteful programs is minuscule. And he difference there is that they serve a necessary purpose. Also, the FBI doesn’t make the laws that are “forced” on people. Elected officials (and their lobbyists) do. The FBI are just federal cops that enforce those laws across state lines. The FBI existing is not a violation of the constitution. By law, …	/r/MGTOW	01/10/19 02:52 PM
2	Raising all this hell because she didn't get promoted? A woman scorned..... That’s completely ridiculous. The CIA and NSA are our first line of defense against attacks from enemy nations and terrorists. Disbanding then would leave us completely unable to prevent attacks before they happen. The armed forces can respond to attacks, but they can’t prevent them. The FBI are just federal cops who can operate across state lines. What benefit would we get from disbanding them? They’re not a spy agency. The fact that you equates them shows you don’t know the first thing about w…	/r/MGTOW	01/10/19 01:07 PM
-1	USA: Fired Officer Says Christian Beliefs Prohibit Him From Training Women. Becoming known as the “Billy Graham rule,” it was spotlighted in 2017 when Vice President Mike Pence’s adherence to the practice gained attention. Evangelicals are the American Taliban. We are in dangerous times here in the US. Threats to our way of life abound from within.	/r/MensRights	11/08/19 05:58 AM
-4	USA: Fired Officer Says Christian Beliefs Prohibit Him From Training Women. Becoming known as the “Billy Graham rule,” it was spotlighted in 2017 when Vice President Mike Pence’s adherence to the practice gained attention. Hi incel! Or is it MGTOW (aka incel)? Or men’s rights? I get the different sects of misogyny mixed up since you’re all so similar.	/r/MensRights	11/08/19 05:54 AM