TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

poloscraft Archive

View 0 posts and 74 comments by poloscraft on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-4

Money
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 05:34 AM
4

Red pil … encourages emotional detachment No, it’s women who hate men that dare to share emotions (other than praising women). Noticing this pattern and warning men before thy get burnt is not sabotaging healthy relationships, but preventing jumping into unhealthy ones
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 10:35 AM
4

Of course, because only men have active role in relationships. Do women ask guys out? Do they plan dates? Do they pay for dates? Are women content with just spending time with a guy without demanding him to spend loads of money on her? Do women reciprocate any effort a man put in dating? No. They don’t. And it’s hella tiring to commit time and energy into dating with no clear goal
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 07:10 PM
5

Not true. Women have more options in both romantic and sexual market. They simply choose casual sex first
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 07:01 AM
1

Just listen to women? They openly admit that. Women don’t marry men who make even slightly less than them. The entire sexual revolution and hook up culture is a proof, that women separate short-term/sexual and long-term/romantic attraction - and act shocked when men expect intimacy in LTR.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 09:55 AM
-5

That’s the point - „everyone in your life does something for you” but it’s mainly women who expect to do nothing for men in the relationship. Men understand, that it’s in both parties effort to start and maintain a relationship. While women see doing something for a man from time to time as some kind of slavery
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 09:48 AM
-3

Love, intimacy, genuine connection for lifetime
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 10:09 AM
1

Anyone who doesn’t have kids past certain age (e.g. 30) shouldn’t have an option to benefit from labour of younger people - such as doctors, firefighters, trades and construction workers, shop assistants etc
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 09:24 PM

Call me old fashioned but I think building long term relationships on lies is wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 07:16 AM
16

Of course they’re not, because they don’t need to. Women generally value money and work over love and bonding for a lifetime and there are numerous studies/surveys for that. It is what it is
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 06:56 AM
2

Men are taught from childhood that their only value is from being objectified. So men are get used to it and women are happy not to bother viewing us as human beings. Why have feminists always supported mandatory draft only for men, including underage? It is easier for women not to see us as fellow human beings
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 08:19 PM
1

What’s wrong with wanting to be desired in relationship? It’s as simple as that: if a woman has sex with strangers, but not with you - she’s not into you and never will. If a woman don’t find you (sexually) attractive at the beginning of relationship, she won’t miraculously be more into you further down the line. I’m not talking about sex itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 05:02 PM
0

In the first point you confuse men’s and women’s perspectives. Most men see intimacy as part of romantic relationship. The goal is to build a stable, long term relationship with one person - romantic and sexual. It is women who separate these two - the entire sexual revolution is a proof. Women have no problem with only sexual encounters with bad boys but are mad when a long term partner expects intimacy from time to time
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 06:27 AM
1

How can they if they have to work instead? Yes, if the retirement age was equal, men could have more time to take care of grandkids
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/26 07:59 AM
8

women can pop out more men to draft But they literally don’t. Women don’t have kids anymore age is 60, because they stop working to take care of grandkids And men can’t take of grandkids?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 12:35 PM
3

Maybe men believe more in building a relationship? Most women have so many options that they can’t decide and look for someone better and better. And then treat themselves as a prize for him - he should be grateful for being chosen. Men want to build stable relationships on what they are offered - shared experiences build stronger connection
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:49 PM
2

Dating is unfair for men because men expect relationships, family, intimacy. Women expect money and status. For centuries men traded resources for family, women traded nurturing for money. Nowadays, women earn more than men and don’t love them romantically. Women have no responsibilities in society so they demand more and more from men
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 08:59 AM
0

What’s wrong with wanting a partner with the same body count as you? Exploring sexualities of both, instead of judging less experienced partner through the lens of previous ones?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 04:02 PM
-5

It’s radical that women willingly impose more duties on themselves (kids + work) and shame men when they can’t live up to it. So a woman gets a good job and won’t even look at a man earning less than her. If she gets a promotion, she looses interest in him. If a man doesn’t play with kids, he’s a burden. But if he take his kids to park, women may call police on him - because they can’t comprehend that a man can take care of his children. If we had a clear division of labour, this wouldn’t be a p…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 09:27 AM
5

But women don’t have dating problems. They already know that they can take initiative, but simply don’t have to
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 04:31 AM

It’s not that men „don’t want to do anything”. It’s that we used to have clear division on roles based on gender (providing, nurturing). Then women actively started pursuing money without changing anything else: they still want men to earn more money than them. Thus men have to both earn money and care for kids. And it’s exhausting.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 03:53 PM

So you’re proving my point. It was u/mrsmariekje who somehow brought kids to the conversation, while the convo was about adults. Women (not kids) have more romantic and sexual (consensual) options to choose from than men. you were responding No, that was her response to mine Never in this convo did I support harassment (no, finding a woman beautiful is not harassment). By saying that women have many potential interests I was returning to my original point, not the scenario with kids brought out …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 09:52 PM
0

Where did I write something about little girls? Yeah, that would be the problem How having a man loving you romantically is the problem? Why do you find romantic and sexual attraction mutually exclusive?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 12:26 PM
-1

Again. Just because there are few constantly horny men doesn’t mean that every man only want sex from relationship. Every woman has a ton of men interested in her both romantically and sexually. And the only thing she has to do is to choose the best one. Assuming that an average man has 10 women interested in him is delusion
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 03:35 PM
0

Of course men desire women romantically. Both men and women want to be romantically and sexually attractive. The difference is that men view vast majority of women as both sexually and romantically attractive. Women don’t even acknowledge that men have romantic feelings. Also they are not sexually interested in men
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 12:47 PM
-2

Because women have 100 guys happy to have a relationship with them and they only have to choose the best one. if 10 women out of 1000 are interested that’s still something And there’s little to none possibility they are compatible. Why do women treat having more to choose from a disadvantage?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 12:34 PM
12

so why would women want to be around people like this? They wouldn’t and that’s the point - women already don’t want to be around majority of men. When men contribute to society they get nothing in return. If majority of men checked out, nothing would change for them - they would be as sexless as before, as emotionally starved as before, be treated as harshly as before
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 08:33 PM
14

No, intimacy is one of humans needs. If a disabled person couldn’t get food (hunt, gather, earn - whatever), changing mindset wouldn’t fill their stomach. There are things we need other people for
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 08:20 PM
-2

It’s not about sexual quotas or whatever but acknowledging basic biology that species enjoy reproducing. It’s simply sad that after thousands of years of men building civilization, creating and protecting culture and striving for giving their kids best possible life, women decided that they don’t like a concept of a family and found their life purpose in creating excel spreadsheets instead
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 07:58 PM
2

Women purposefully omit to tell, what they find physically attractive in a man and jump straight to personality traits they like. Which are worthless if a man is not physically good looking.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 06:49 AM
1

Serving is a willing taking care of others’ needs. For example physical: looking after sick person makes your life harder. Emotional: you want him to listen to your vents, but it’s emotional strain and mental to work to deal with other people’s thoughts. So you wouldn’t reciprocate that These are chores to maintain in any normal relationship So since you wouldn’t do anything for your partner, what do you want from him, apart from him listening to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 02:14 PM
1

Serving is a willing taking care of others’ needs. For example physical: looking after sick person makes your life harder. Emotional: you want him to listen to your vents, but it’s emotional strain and mental to work to deal with other people’s thoughts. So you wouldn’t reciprocate that These are chores to maintain in any normal relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 02:10 PM
1

No, him serving you and you serving him. That’s mutual work. This is what you’re against since your first comment
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 12:56 PM
1

This is what I said. You only care about what he must do to you and I said that relationship is working together. That’s mutual work. And this is what you’re against
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 12:52 PM
1

Why do you act like mutual work in relationship is wrong or gross?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 12:23 PM
1

Because I wrote two comments, you gave the same reply to both and I only continued conversation to one? Even in the original comment you wrote all the work he has to do but it’s a dealbreaker “if I need to serve him”. Your point didn’t change. Your argument is that I omitted things I will do to a partner. Yes, and I clarified further, that I don’t know, what she may want from me. While your argument from the start is that you don’t want to do anything to your partner
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 12:10 PM
1

I wrote from the start that BOTH people put effort in relationships as a reply to YOUR statement that ONLY men need to work Your ‘got you’ argument is that I answered your question on what I like in women. Imagine that women are different from each other and may like different qualities in men. So I won’t answer that for them
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 11:20 AM
1

Because I already stated before: both people put effort in a relationship. It’s up to a woman to decide, what does she want from me and what does she find attractive. I won’t speak for them. On the other hand, you wrote all the things a man needs to do and clearly stated, that you don’t want to do anything yourself towards him
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 11:00 AM
1

if I need to serve him in some way You literally wrote that any effort towards your partner is a dealbreaker
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 10:42 AM
1

Kindness, smile, looks
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 10:33 AM
1

So you want a man to put all his effort into you while you don’t put any effort into him. That’s not partnership, that’s slavery. Relationship is mutual effort so both of you are better together
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 10:23 AM
1

You’re so downvoted, but it’s so right. In relationships both parties share something and total outcome is greater than individual effort. Thus, both parties are net positive from transaction. She only described what she wants from man and how she can benefit without putting any effort - thus, draining him
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 08:02 PM

This is exactly why it matters. Firstly, you are attracted to each other physically (phenylethylamine rushes in your body), form meaningful relationships and continue bonding by shared experiences (oxytocin and dopamine sustain happiness when phenylethylamine spike fades). Marriage (or generally LTR) is a form of sustaining satisfaction when both of you ages. I think you have twisted idea of red pill. They don’t say that woman’s value is only in her looks. But it’s easier for a her to start a re…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 03:14 PM
3

This is what women don’t understand about manosphere. Men take red pill, because advice from women never works
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 06:43 AM
1

You sound like there are no kind men among those who want to have sex. These are not exclusive. Women have thousands of men interested in them and only have to pick the best one. Men don’t even have the opportunities to choose from
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 07:15 PM
1

Where do I blame women or mock those seeking therapy? I don’t blame women for what government does (although our minister of equality does absolutely nothing towards equality). I blame women for supporting military draft, when they won’t fight themselves. Here is a survey from Poland: 49% of women support mandatory military draft (47% oppose) but only 29% support equality
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 02:44 PM
1

Men are primary victims of war and women support mandatory military draft for men Men commit more suicides - which is/may be result of emotional abuse they experience from women. Men’s issues are neglected and mocked by feminists
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 11:38 AM
1

Yeah, I agree. It’s easier for hookup-man to settle down and become husband-material than for husband-material to even get into single relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/25 10:01 PM

I hate this analogy because it implies that all women are great matches and men should be happy to get any attention. Yes, men are on the desert, but the quality of water presented to them is of this in swamp. And women behave like we should be grateful to get anything
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 10:07 AM
2

And by that same logic wouldn’t a single man in his 30s also have bad character? Yes
/r/RedPillWomen03/05/25 07:14 AM
-3

Somehow when men say they like beautiful women, women assume they mean „only beautiful”. Women in their 20s are beautiful in both physical non-physical ways (character). When beauty fades with time, there are still other components of attractiveness left (being kind, loyal etc). When a semi-beautiful woman is single after 30, it means that her character was a put off. And she is left with neither physical nor character beauty. Hence, not worth pursuing
/r/RedPillWomen03/05/25 05:49 AM
3

Yet only women lie about that
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 01:13 PM
1

Maybe only slightly related, but I am tall and love being dressed in a suit. People really treat you differently. Additionally: the possibility to spit on someone I dislike
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 01:09 PM
1

Pro-male ideologies fail because a) they are not as uniform as feminism b) feminists have support of all women and most men, while pro-male activists have no women and minority of men on their side
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/04/25 05:34 PM
12

First, you just use „not all women” as a proof. So I may counter it with typical counterarguments: „not all women but always a woman”, „not all women but many enough” or something equally stupid. Secondly, you say that it’s just our echochamber, social media algorithms and so on. You write „even though there are 4 billion women in the world. But sure, let’s trust 20 TikTok”. So I ask: where are the alternatives? Let’s say I see 20 videos claiming that all women hate me. And exactly 0 women irl a…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 08:32 AM
1

You sure can claim that you’re entitled to safety. But you’re not entitled to me risking my life for yours
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 06:07 PM
2

Because women date who they want. Men date who they can. Men date horrible women, because they have no other options. „Would guys choose the nice sweet girl who’s very plain over a hot bitch?” Yes! Most of us would! But this „sweet girl” would never consider being in relationship with an average guy
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 06:23 AM
1

Yes, desire to be loved should be a basic in relationships. LTR/marriage should be about good relationship, friendship, love, sex etc. Men settle for less because we know that it’s a fairytale. We can accept this reality and humans’ flawed nature. Contrary to women, who seek for Prince Charming and can’t lower their standards
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 10:56 AM
1

Wrong. Men have standards. We want to be loved and cherished. Do you think we don’t want to come back home to the person who loves us? But this is exactly what women call „unrealistic expectations”.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 10:35 AM
19

Yes. Men also strive for genuine love, not sex. Women can only be happy when all of their unrealistic expectations are met. I will ride on your analogy a bit: both men and women are in a dessert. Women are presented a variety of water: still, sparkling, with multiple flavours and different temperatures. And they refuse to try any of them, until they are presented THE ONE and only perfect water. Men are given no choice whatsoever and will be content with swamp water, even if they still want a cle…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 06:48 AM

It is not and never has been. Feminists are against equal educations of boys and girls (they always push for more girls at uni even though they already make majority). Feminists are against men’s right to live (because they support mandatory military draft, but only for men). Our minister of equality is against equal retirement rights. No, feminism is by name to only support women. Especially by being against men’s rights
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 07:26 AM
1

We recently had this situation in Poland. Mother left the baby without father’s knowledge and he can’t be given the kid back, because the kid is officially orphan, with new identity and so on. Mother is of course blameless
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 07:46 AM
14

I fully agree. This war clearly showed that only men have legal obligations towards the country. That’s insane, that feminists will happily send men for years long war, but at the same time treat nine month pregnancy like the worst thing that can happen
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 05:15 AM
10

More like: man takes his kid to the park? Why is he around children? Probably ped0
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 06:32 AM
41

Yeah. That’s why feminists support mandatory military draft for men - they don’t see us as humans with family, friends, passions. For them we are nothing more than a disposable tool to get rid of as quickly as possible
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 04:58 AM
4

Within 50 years (hopefully sooner) I won’t be a member of society anymore. Why should I care?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/24 09:15 PM
4

Yes, there is ton of law biased against men in Poland such as higher retirement age and military conscription. At the same time there is no law biased strictly against women. Moreover, by law, women cannot work as hard as men in some jobs and are entitled to bigger benefits.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 06:22 PM
-2

True. Every first-aid training says that firstly you should consider if the situation is safe to you, so that rescuer won’t have to be rescued. You are not obliged to risk your life, even for a woman. What’s interesting is that some time ago there was a post where OP suggested that ‘women are not entitled to feeling safe in public’ or something like that and women were mad. I think it’s the same scenario, but responses are different. Women state obvious facts that no one has to be forced to be a…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/24 10:10 AM
0

I agree. Women have way more options to not have a child than men. Men’s opportunities (condom + vasectomy) last till intercourse, while women can prevent pregnancy before, during and after sex, while also nine month past. If a man doesn’t want to have a kid, he should have the same time period for decision
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 01:18 PM
3

Yes, but feminists lie that they care about equality
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 08:04 PM
1

Feminists don’t care either. Does that mean that the problem is nonexistent? The right wing at least raises awareness while leftists actively act against men’s rights
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 06:53 PM
-4

I find girls 15-25 yo hot and I don't care, what you or feminists say about it
/r/MensRights05/05/23 10:57 AM
1

The only place I'm complimented at is my part time job at philharmonic. Usually about look (probably only because of suit) and politeness/manners (well, they pay for being polite). That's where I realised, that good look is everything and I can boost my overall appearance by elegant wear
/r/MensRights01/05/23 05:15 PM
2

On Facebook I had in proposed a group about relationships because I visited group about death and corpses
/r/MGTOW222/08/20 01:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter