TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

poltronaperdue Archive

View 0 posts and 24 comments by poltronaperdue on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Oh they understand it alright.
/r/MensRights29/06/24 08:49 PM
5

I know- that’s why I’m saying “at its core”… that’s what it should be about "Real X has never been tried" might sometimes be technically true, but that insight doesn't carry much water when it comes to negotiating collective rules for action.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/24 12:34 PM
15

Progressives were msiandrist since the 70s. Let's not pretend this started with Trump.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/24 02:35 PM
1

What are the instruments used to determine equal positions? The main issue is the tables they use to determine equal positions. The last time I looked into it (a long time ago), adjuncts and full professors were in the same category. I believe this is now fixed but you can see how the more coarse-grained these tables are, the more room for error.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 08:53 PM
3

So when you control for hours worked, occupation, education, etc, and have a true apples-to-apples comparison, It's still not a true apples-to-apples comparison because, e.g. the instruments used to determine equal positions are very coarse-grained. that pay gap is about 5% and even that is debated about why it exists. The sentence you mentioned refers to the uncorrected gap. It is true though that the causes for the corrected gap are not known (by definition).
/r/MensRights23/05/24 07:21 AM
109

We didn't get everything we wanted. We are women, we should get everything we want. It's society's job to make sure we get everything we want, even if we don't know what that is yet. Yeah, that's still feminism with another name. Not a single word about the men her "movement" fucked over or about how many unfair advantages she got to further her "career". Zero. Accountability? Zero. Self-reflection? Close to zero. The consequences of her own decisions are always somebody else's fault and it's so…
/r/MensRights20/05/24 01:02 PM
4

I remember that legendary article, which Jezebel has since deleted (yet remains in archive form). Do you have the link?
/r/MensRights19/05/24 11:50 AM
50

One of the biggest challenges men face is being discriminated against in the name of "equality". Curious to see if they can square that circle.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/24 05:37 PM
52

It just started off as using hate to gain equality. Not even. Take suffrage for example. Women were the first group in history who gained the right to vote without the corresponding duty to kill and die in war.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 02:54 PM
16

Well, it worked so far.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/24 08:19 AM
7

Archived link.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/24 06:25 PM
2

So essentially he's not woke enough, doesn't mention her pet issues, and disagrees with the notion that outcome disparities are prima facie proof of discrimination. Did I miss anything?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/24 12:32 PM
6

Men exist to provide and protect. A man who spends on himself is wasting what is rightfully owed to women - that's all there is to it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/24 04:48 PM
–

My read here is that it's the clinton karen types who you are referring to, and not really the progressive types. There will always be confusion caused by the new state religion's strategic refusal to name itself. They're neither liberal nor left nor progressive. They're identity-obsessed authoritarians, Lewis' "omnipotent moral busybodies". I also tend to view this as stemming from the politicization of feminism, something that was a choice (a poor one '''imho''') in the 90s to push certain age…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/24 05:00 PM
34

The contemporary progressive* movement hates men and is openly advocating for policies and social mores that hurt them. The question is not why men are slowly starting to turn away from people who hate them, it's why it took this long. *there is nothing left or liberal about them. They're Helen Lovejoys in new clothes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/24 09:51 AM
1

Where is anyone not treated equally by left wing male advocates? You want special treatment. This is what entryism looks like.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/24 09:05 AM
–

I have a hard time parsing what you wrote. Some editing might clear things up. Identity politics means demanding special treatment for your identity group. Membership of that group can be based on ethnicity, nationality, sex, or sexual orientation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/24 09:17 PM
–

I don't know about discrimination towards men, I just get tired of bitchiness sometimes. Then why should "a new men's movement" "include" you? What do you bring to the table? Also, why the hell is inclusion "special treatment"? You are already included. You can do something for men now. Call your local representative, ask them what they are doing for men. Volunteer in a soup kitchen. Learn about anti-male discrimination and advocate against it. You don't need a membership card for that. What do …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/24 09:14 PM
3

Any nascent men's movement that already plays identity politics before its inception is bound to fail. The myth of unidirectional oppression is currently the most effective tool used to justify anti-male discrimination. To grant special privileges to people within a movement based on their purported place in the oppression hierarchy is to reaffirm that ridiculous frame. Are you concerned about anti-male discrimination? Welcome! Do you want special treatment? There's the door.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/24 09:35 AM
13

I've never heard of this before. That's because it's not true. What is true is that some research used to heavily rely on male test subjects because they were more readily available, thus skewing the results. Some medical conditions that affect men more than women are also better understood than for women (the reverse is, of course, also true).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/24 09:20 AM
20

They’re suggesting that increasing female privileges will automatically fix men’s issues. FTFY.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/24 11:07 PM
11

Because feminist orthodoxy doesn't survive prolonged contact with reality. It has to be propped up by social shaming and censorship. On a level playing field, it loses. Why would adherents of the dominant ideology pick the one arena in which they are bound to lose?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/24 12:38 PM
41

Moving in this direction it is possible to get the queer communities on board, and the communities of non-white feminisms People aren't brought on board because of some fancy new theory. Women support anti-male feminism because it is advantageous for them to do so, both materially (sinecures for women, preferential hiring, etc.) as well as in terms of status. Same goes for various forms of "queer theory" and racial grievance. Same for the TERF wars. Identity politics is all fun and games until I…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/24 05:59 AM
3

Changing what you call yourself because the opposition dominates the debate is a fool's errand. Whatever label you pick will soon have the same negative associations among those susceptible to propaganda.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/24 09:42 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter