TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

pontiflexrex Archive

View 0 posts and 190 comments by pontiflexrex on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Funny how any post here supposedly written by a woman contains the word female.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 08:34 PM
-2

That’s the highest level of cherry picking. If you know how to read statistics, you know what you did there. There are dozens of data points you ignored that directly contradict your thesis.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 07:43 PM
3

Smart people don’t read, that’s well known. Keep not exercising that brain, you’re doing well and you’re not at all miserable, as your post demonstrates quite clearly.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 11:33 AM
1

« Novels are dominated by women ». Your premise is wrong snowflake : https://www.theguardian.com/books/2011/feb/04/research-male-writers-dominate-books-world
/r/MensRights07/11/22 07:53 AM
-32

That didn’t happen, thank you.
/r/MensRights06/11/22 03:25 PM
-12

You people are really fighting for a lot of rights you already have but don’t exercise.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 05:24 PM
2

You’re the equivalent of old ladies in the sixties being scared of above the knee dresses. Social norms change snowflake, this is not a big deal.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 06:40 AM
11

The American pAtRiOtS bonner for Russian autocracy is the clearest example you people never knew what freedom is and will always confuse it with your own very sterile interest. Keep being distracted by your pointless identity politics America, that will only accelerate your very obvious downfall.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/22 11:20 AM
0

Well, no. It does not say men can’t complain… It says men suffer from the system in place, recognizing that it is no good for everyone. Do you have a actual example of what you describe in the title? Because this is not it.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 09:20 PM
1

Can you show / link / reference an example? Curious to see who uses this argument so frequently that you see it a lot.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 08:17 PM
-7

The fact that almost all commenters think that the word gaze in « male / female gaze » as anything to do with staring is absolutely hilarious and proof most of you don’t care about knowing anything about your « enemy » and are just here to vent based on wrong perceptions. Anyway, the world gaze here is describing the way men and women view and depict gender roles in society. This is why, when talking about male gaze in cinema, feminists will target the fact that this movie is using female charac…
/r/MensRights24/01/22 11:37 AM
2

Many cases of what?
/r/MensRights23/11/21 06:39 PM
2

Who said it was funny?
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 01:38 PM
-20

There has never been a post here without the “imagine if the role were reversed”. Are you people even able to articulate another idea?
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 01:38 PM
2

Tell me you’re both anti women and anti Muslim without telling me bla-bla-bla. Congrats on the overused « whatabout Muslim women though! ».
/r/AntiFeminists28/08/21 04:40 AM
-6

So true, people are not protesting the talibans at all. Anywhere in the world. Feminism bad. Muslim bad. So true!
/r/AntiFeminists28/08/21 04:38 AM
-6

bUt ThEy StArTeD iT! What a great way to admit your fight is just as worthless as the fight of the other side… Congrats on this sad but revealing “what about them though?!”.
/r/AntiFeminists22/08/21 09:36 PM
0

Yep, you clearly understood what is happening, congrats!
/r/AntiFeminists22/08/21 09:34 PM
-2

Great, once again, I wasn’t disputing any facts, I was taking them as true even though there was no source. Also, the burden of sourcing should really on people posting but that’s too much to ask here I know.
/r/AntiFeminists22/08/21 08:57 PM
-2

I don’t want to ignore the stats in the post. As a matter of fast, I was considering them accurate (even if there was no source), and I was making a point with the assumption this all of this was true. So I already conceded in my first sentence what you spent four paragraphs to argue… while you were lambasting me about missing the point. So yeah… as usual, people in this sub keep seeing in others was they fail to see in themselves. If you ever want to react to the point I was making (economic wa…
/r/AntiFeminists22/08/21 06:27 PM
-8

If people here started turning against the economic oppressors that have been literally killing them, the world would be a better place for everyone. But they chose to focus on a useless gender war, aiming at making the world miserable for everyone instead.
/r/AntiFeminists22/08/21 03:11 PM
-12

These numbers are unsourced but let’s pretend they are not BS (I’m sure everyone here found a source before commenting anyway). What would make you happy there? That more women die in these crappy jobs? Or maybe your real fight should not be about that pointless gender war you lose yourselves into. Maybe you should be fighting against the powers that make these jobs dangerous in the first place? But yeah, keep fighting your feminist boogeyman and not the economic and political powers that keep y…
/r/AntiFeminists22/08/21 03:08 PM
-2

This is not the argument you think it is when there are five times as many single mothers than fathers (and when 25% of children are in a single parent family). If you factor this in, the reality is not the same suddenly. Sorry to be the one to burst the victimization bubble.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 06:23 AM
1

You’ve somehow made it sound dumber: so your ideology makes you dream of a 100% male “civilization” - where the BENEFIT you reap would be the extinction of your society in a single generation - and you’re convinced of your superior intellect, vision and gender? I guess by that logic you’re also a patriot for crossing to destroy your country by leaving rather than fighting for it. And finally I’m sure there is no homoerotic fantasy driving you when you cook up this scenario. You’ve showed a lot o…
/r/AntiFeminists09/08/21 11:04 AM
-2

Thanks for repeating the exact same thing. So I’ll do the same : this is a disappearing fantasy, most commonly encountered in suicidal cases when someone is hurt and mad at other people and scream « you’ll miss me when I’m gone ». It’s an attempt to get attention and to make people pay for your misery. You miserable and oppressed, we get it. And you’d like to watch the world miss you if you were not here. It’s just a bit sad, but I know you’re hurting and you’re afraid, so I empathize. Truly.
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/21 10:16 AM
-9

Same logic as a pseudo-suicidal teen saying « you’ll miss me when I’m dead! ». A great way to live your life and build your values I’m sure.
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/21 08:28 PM
-14

Yes, because everyone advocates for men to disappear. Keep living in your victim fantasy…
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/21 07:00 PM
-6

If this sub was not allowed to personify the “enemy” constantly, you would have nothing to complain about. Every argument in here revolves around making the assumption that “feminists” is the governing body of everything. But keep fighting against genders... you’re only missing the real war, the one making you poorer and poorer on a burning planet. When climate change and poverty will make your life hell, I’m sure you’ll be so happy that you fought for the right to say “active shooter” instead o…
/r/MensRights19/06/21 05:42 PM
-12

Conservatives: winning made-up arguments against imaginary adversaries since forever. Congrats on defeating yourselves once again!
/r/AntiFeminists11/06/21 05:58 PM
-4

Don’t you think the fact it was written last week explains why it’s showing up higher in results? Or do you manage to combine sociological illiteracy with the technological kind?
/r/MensRights04/06/21 03:29 PM
-1

I’m sure deep down, you’re angry at yourself for not being able to articulate anything better than that same grew-up-edgy-on-message-boards-in-the-90s answer. Practice something else maybe?
/r/AntiFeminists04/06/21 11:22 AM
1

I’m sure you’ll understand eventually that feminists and progressives are historically against wars and forced armed service. And that this “all of the sudden” argument is just another example of this sub’s lack of self awareness.
/r/AntiFeminists04/06/21 11:09 AM
-37

Do you believe that no article were ever written about the men that died?
/r/MensRights04/06/21 11:04 AM
-2

Didn’t say it’s not funny. It is funny. What’s also funny is that propensity you have to placate truth on parody.
/r/AntiFeminists04/06/21 04:18 AM
-77

If you think parody is true, that explains a lot.
/r/AntiFeminists03/06/21 01:59 PM
1

Can I select four ugly anti-feminist and four beautiful feminist or would that be a dOuBlE sTaNdArD?
/r/AntiFeminists24/05/21 07:28 PM
0

Should men be virgins to up their value as well?
/r/AntiFeminists09/05/21 03:41 PM
1

That’s great insight into her mind and also a strong set of quantative and qualitative studies you referenced to prove the existence of pervasive misandry in our society. I have to bow down in front of such academic rigor. I was only speaking from bias, using my own truth to delude myself into thinking the whole works like that. I saw one thing and applied it to everything. Thank you for showing me the way of scientific discovery.
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/21 03:59 AM
1

This person said “it’s not systemic”, proceeded to quote a definition saying “prejudice against men as a gender”. If it’s against all men because of their gender, it’s systemic. Also, it has still nothing to do with the action of one criminal that this sub is fallaciously trying to use as proof of a systemic issue. There might be a systemic issue (I.e. misandry) but this screenshot of the header of an article is not it. But sure, my rhetoric is certainly the problem here.
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/21 03:40 AM
-1

Being afraid of intellect sure is another form of fragility in action. Sorry if my three sentences made you feel like I was being aggressively intellectual? It’s not my native language so I’m trying to make sense by using carefully chosen words. But again, you should be able to live without being threaten by tone and ideas.
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/21 01:51 AM
1

You repeated what I said and persuaded yourself that you were in contradiction. This is something I never saw before to be frank so thanks for confused validation? Idk this is too much bias on action to wrap my head around. Or maybe you’re just smarter as you so modestly claimed to make yourself fell superior?
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/21 01:47 AM
0

Misandry would be a pervasive value system. And it would imply that this woman did what she did out of a specific hatred for all men and to keep all men down because of their gender. This is just one crazy woman. This is not systemic. The same way one guy killing his wife is not misogyny. Don’t try and define stuff, you are bad at this.
/r/AntiFeminists06/05/21 07:49 PM
-23

You have a poor understanding of the word misandry.
/r/AntiFeminists06/05/21 02:46 PM
-8

It’s quite different from the original post isn’t it?
/r/AntiFeminists03/05/21 11:40 AM
-17

Build a fake website Create a series of strawmen arguments Get bots to publish fake comments Screenshot your own website or share it enough until an idiot does it Manufactured outrage for people begging for it to get through the day
/r/AntiFeminists03/05/21 11:31 AM
1

That’s because you don’t know how search works.
/r/AntiFeminists25/04/21 10:08 AM
1

Are you forgetting the fact it’s all make believe written by psychotic men?
/r/AntiFeminists21/04/21 08:16 PM
2

This image does not convey the meaning you want it to. Poor, POOR, editorial and visual skills.
/r/AntiFeminists21/04/21 11:30 AM
-29

Yes! No man would ever be immature and entitled!
/r/PussyPassDenied20/04/21 11:11 AM
0

Yes, one example means everyone does that! Consent is always there no matter what people say, either people involved or not! Rape does not exist! Men can’t be raped! So glad we agree on all of this... First I was afraid this post and this sub would be hypocritical but I’m glad it is not!
/r/AntiFeminists16/04/21 07:01 AM
0

This is made to deny the principle of consent, making it easier to pretend that consent is a bullshit concept used by women and Twitter to oppress men. Right? Like 80% of this sub is about false rape accusations... But if consent isn’t a real issue, then men claiming to have been raped must also be dismissed. No double standard are allowed here, right? Let’s be consistent people!
/r/AntiFeminists16/04/21 05:35 AM
-6

It’s weird that, especially on this sub, you’d be claiming that men can’t be raped... But all right.
/r/AntiFeminists15/04/21 11:54 AM
0

Pretty arrogant to declare your meme perfect when it has to resort to alien invasions to win an imaginary argument against an imaginary enemy.
/r/AntiFeminists02/04/21 04:06 PM
-4

Nice projecting! You’re implying that I support the rhetoric of the bottom image. I don’t and that was clear from my comment. Being busy projecting, you did not even touched the core of my argument: aren’t presidents supposed to be held to higher standard than random citizens? Don’t president saying hateful shit do more damage that one random piece of cardboard held by a nobody saying hateful shit? If you think NO, fine, we have incompatible moral values about the obligations of our democratic l…
/r/AntiFeminists19/03/21 06:26 PM
-10

« I refuse to see the difference between some random woman in a march and the President of the US. » You’re cherry picking, but you’re not even good at that. This is hilarious.
/r/AntiFeminists19/03/21 12:03 PM
-24

This fallacious talking point again... « Replace someone of greater privilege by someone in the minority and you’ll see ! ». It’s not called a false equivalency for nothing...
/r/AntiFeminists11/03/21 05:57 PM
-9

That so far it could be something that actually happened or something you made up to avoid boredom and rack up some internet point.
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/21 07:14 PM
-27

You forgot to mention if it was in your head or not.
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/21 05:42 PM
-12

Way to deflect! Keep living on that high horse! Unfortunately, with that line of thinking, you lost all right to complain about cancel culture on YouTube, social média, the media, universities and so on (which I’m guessing you’re doing regularly with great hypocrisy). So sad...
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/21 05:44 PM
-11

I’m sure you would have been fine gettin kicked out of school or a job because of something your parents did...
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/21 04:59 PM
-35

Oh, so you have nothing but exaggerated beliefs barely based on reality. And even if all of those were real, it doesn’t back up your initial claim at all. Also, even if those were true, they wouldn’t be the result of feminism. One example among your collection of victimization fantasies: who do you think voted laws excluding men from being recognized as rape victims? You know, when woman lawmakers were virtually inexistant. And these laws were amended in many countries since the 2000s/2010s to i…
/r/AntiFeminists26/02/21 02:03 PM
-48

You know how you can’t prove a negative but you are required to prove a positive? How it’s like the basis of all science and justice in the world? So yeah, waiting on anything to back up your claim... And of course I’m not talking about one random example, I’m waiting on proof that all feminist thinkers said what you claimed they all said. Thanks a lot!
/r/AntiFeminists26/02/21 01:44 PM
-78

“Women need special rights”! Said no feminist ever. Nice strawwoman you got there!
/r/AntiFeminists26/02/21 01:22 PM
0

Oooooh, so the point =/= the equivalency! Got it, so it’s a false equivalency! Thanks for explained the fallacy to me.
/r/AntiFeminists24/02/21 04:41 PM
1

Are all feminist also homeless? Or are all homeless women feminists? I don’t know, I still don’t get it. I’m sure I’m missing the equivalency but it’s a tough one to get!
/r/AntiFeminists24/02/21 04:19 PM
0

So all men are homeless? I don’t get it...
/r/AntiFeminists23/02/21 07:11 PM
-2

In what country would this March take place? Because it has to be a country where there is still a draft and where married men can force a woman to have an abortion. Definitely not every (developed) country... Also, nice try with the “a drunk women is responsible for what happens to her”, you can see the underlying wet dream that it represents for whoever created this. Overall, to bad that trashy and dispersed talking points are diluting a couple of reasonable points. But that’s what this moveme…
/r/AntiFeminists22/02/21 07:19 AM
-19

In France again, women drive 11 200 km a year on average and men 12 500km. And women account for 47% of drivers. Does that mean that men drive 90+% (hell even 70+%...) of total distance? NOOOOO. Spin it any way you want, that’s not going to shift reality... Men are way (way!) more dangerous on the road because that adopt garbage behavior, and that doesn’t change with miles driven. Also, weird argument to try and alleviate men of their responsibility for 90% of drunk driving deaths by saying they…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/02/21 11:18 AM
-25

Nope, not true. Just one example in my country (but maybe it’s the only one on the world like this... I mean it’s possible...) : 75% of people killed on the road are men 83% of people responsible for a deadly accident are men 92% of people responsible for a deadly accident while drunk are men 91% of people responsible for a deadly accident while on drugs are men This is for France. And I’m guessing men don’t account for 90+% of miles driven... Don’t just declare what you want to be true.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/02/21 10:04 AM
1

You did it again, you actually insulted yourself... Do you not see that your words are directed at you? I’m going to assume it’s an education issue, not a self-hatred one.
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/21 07:27 PM
1

There is nothing specific about you that I would have gathered from your post history... What a weird thing to say. Did you think that I got a generic description of a crappy life from your history? You must not have a high opinion of yourself! A rare self burn if you ask me, thanks for the laughs.
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/21 07:01 PM
-1

Hope billionaires see this. I’m sure you’ll be rewarded for being their corporate simp. I’m sure you won’t just get nothing but a crappy life and misdirected resentment.
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/21 06:43 PM
-7

It’s quite the only reason this sub exists. It’s not even the list of richest women, but that wouldn’t fit the narrative... And it’s also not taking into account most of these guys (like almost every billionaire) did not « work hard » for their fortune. They had huge inheritance to start with, exploited thousands of people, and benefited from a system that enjoys having legions of idiots focusing on gender stuff rather that trying to understand who truly makes their life miserable. So yeah, don’…
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/21 04:55 PM
-41

Guess what is used to extend life expectancy? Bone marrow research... Crazy how science works huh? But you don’t care how it works because some random loser makes the association for you between “bone marrow research” and “feminism”, and you don’t question it. Even better, you extend it to lesbianism, because we all know that this whole situation triggers your little heart doesn’t it? What a dumpster fire of a reaction, you basically have away all you are and all you can be in two sentences.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/21 07:52 PM
-2

I don’t think there are women here. :) So who am I suppose to defend exactly? And what rewards am I expecting? Also, it gets a bit scary when a whole community can’t form a sentence without white knight and simp. You don’t seem able to think without a preexisting framework that was built by fringe authors and bloggers. You should try sociology sometime, it’s an actual way of understanding reality. And a field built by people that aren’t trying to profit from being polemists. To make it more appe…
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/21 01:43 PM
-1

White knight, simp... Can’t really form a sentence without the buzzwords can you? I understand you’re looking for confort in communities such as this, a semblance of understanding of the world around you and of social dynamics you feel uncomfortable with. But I assure you that you’d feel better if you were able to form your own opinion without the need to be told which exact words to use, which gender is the enemy just because it’s another one. Basically you’d be better living without a fabricat…
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/21 01:26 PM
-16

It’s confortable to have buzzwords as intellectual shortcuts isn’t it? Congrats on contributing nothing to the landscape of gender wars!
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/21 01:10 PM
-34

I agree about your double standard... when you’re thinking that the second one is a joke but the first one is an attack. Funny how chronology works!
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/21 10:04 AM
-86

Are you proud of plagiarism? Or are you enjoying the quality of “nO yOu” rhetorical argument? Or are you saying that men are not funny and have to copy women? I’m lost...
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/21 07:20 AM
1

How are you backing the « majority » part of your argument? Any studies or something that would validate the claim that I’m misinformed? Or is it a vais you elevated to personal truth? I’m not trying to gauge which « side » is more numerous by the way, I’m telling you that serious people in the research fields do not think the way you’ve become convinced that way (mostly by people interested in selling hard copies rather than academic papers; and of course by the level of « us versus them » in s…
/r/AntiFeminists24/01/21 06:29 PM
3

I think that you should maybe try and read actual contemporary feminist research. I did because I wrote a tv series about males and their suffering in modern society in my country, and aaaaaaall of these researchers acknowledge the burden on men and the fact that some issues are underestimated / ignored. All of them! If you restrict feminists to idiots on social media and the occasional writer/journalist using phrases like “toxic masculinity”, which no researcher will use by the way (ever!), to …
/r/AntiFeminists24/01/21 03:44 PM
0

Are you threatened by people trying to elaborate? Which I may tend do you as English is not my first language, but in any case: why does that matter?
/r/AntiFeminists24/01/21 01:12 PM
-8

Just trying to get to the part where people here are great at debating, in opposition to the feminists that you constantly characterize as agressive, dismissive and incapable of debate. In other word, I’m waiting for someone here to be better than them but it takes a long time...
/r/AntiFeminists24/01/21 05:46 AM
-48

Why is that?
/r/AntiFeminists24/01/21 05:26 AM
-69

Do you mean the conversation where I acknowledged OC’s suffering while opening up the possibility of nuance about the cause? And to which you answered with a peremptory assertion, immediately characterized my reality as fake without knowing me and closed the door on any potential debate? But yeah sure I’m the one making it impossible to debate... If you feel you’ve been overly sensitive and agressive in your reaction, maybe you could start by listing feminist researchers (researchers, not random…
/r/AntiFeminists24/01/21 04:37 AM
-104

Nobody’s denying your suffering, we just don’t agree on the causes when you argue that it’s all the feminists fault...
/r/AntiFeminists24/01/21 04:00 AM
7

Was he objectified for his shirt?
/r/AntiFeminists04/01/21 11:27 AM
-4

I’m sorry you felt insulted, that must be hard. But I’m sure it wouldn’t take long to find some joke in your previous posts or comments that other people would find offensive. And I’m guessing your reaction would be « people can’t take a joke no more ». Hope I’m wrong, but usually I would be right to assume this from users on this sub (that I once hoped to be a serious and progressive one).
/r/AntiFeminists06/12/20 08:05 PM
-5

I’m sure you think that « people can’t take a joke anymore » and yet you get outraged at this tiniest of jokes. So thin is the skin.
/r/AntiFeminists06/12/20 07:15 PM
3

It’s a message reposted hundreds of time by outrage-inducing bots. Congrats, you’re gullible... and quite slow as well, since it has been going on for a year now. A quick Twitter search would have let you figure all of this in minutes. Stop being a slave to political bots, and focus on real stuff!
/r/MensRights06/10/20 07:22 PM
38

Feminists are so radical that they wanted to build their own strawwomen! And that’s how this sub was born!
/r/AntiFeminists20/09/20 07:41 PM
0

Dis you read the ruling before posting?
/r/AntiFeminists12/09/20 06:41 AM
3

Camgirls famously says”sToP sExUaLiZiNg uS”. Well, strawgirls do at least.
/r/AntiFeminists04/09/20 07:49 AM
3

Where does it that only women can be raped?
/r/MensRights26/08/20 11:27 AM
-8

It just means that you get lost in a pointless fight about who has it worse while the root problem of AAAAALL the problems you mentioned (poverty, dying on the job, homelessness...) are caused by economic and class inequality. By keeping your focus on “women are offended and don’t have any real problems”, you give a free pass to the actual people manipulating you (whether they are men or women). But go on, keep guessing that I’m a woman as the final fallacy in a 3-fallacy long comment.
/r/AntiFeminists23/08/20 06:37 PM
1

I only now what I wrote about them in a documentary about online hatred (also in a subsequent book about fallacies). It was in French though, but should we say it counts? Also, you used two more in your reply - one being different from the first three, so four in total). And I used one myself in my last sentence, if you want to play some more.
/r/MensRights23/08/20 06:33 PM
-4

Do you want to play the game “name the 3 logical fallacies in your sentence”? You should find them easily, they’re quite the basic ones.
/r/MensRights23/08/20 05:46 PM
-7

If someone’s is afraid of heights, do you spend that much time explaining why they’re wrong to be afraid? Imagine gatekeeping someone else’s fears (especially someone you can’t imagine being for biological reasons).
/r/MensRights23/08/20 05:36 PM
-12

Ah yes, the classic: “making something about gender when it should be about class”. Keep going, poverty will magically disappear when feminism is gone.
/r/AntiFeminists23/08/20 05:31 PM
33

What a great strawhusband.
/r/AntiFeminists22/08/20 09:06 PM
-5

So you’re doing exactly what I said... I know you are unable to see it at this point, so don’t worry about it. Good luck in the trenches, this will amount to no change, but I hope you’ll find your place in the world that way.
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/20 03:40 PM
-12

You’re just mirroring a feminist argument. Wouldn’t it make more sense - from a rhetorical point of view - to claim that it’s none or both? Because here you just seem as basic as the arguments you denounce.
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/20 03:21 PM
1

This is not « men abandoning traditional roles » stuff... If you can’t get an example of such behavior (like being strong, not crying, being a provider, etc) resulting in a ban, aren’t you just strawmaning? (Or strawsubredditing?)
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/20 02:40 PM
5

What belongs in this « men abandoning traditional roles » category that could get a sub banned?
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/20 07:41 AM
1

Is what you’re doing called a strawman argument or a strawwoman argument?
/r/AntiFeminists09/08/20 11:12 PM
0

8 upvotes! Yes! Proof!
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/20 09:07 AM
-7

Hating men is not feminism = men’s right talking point. Feminism is not hating men = women’s right talking point. You’re getting outraged at your own doxa.
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/20 04:32 PM
-10

You understood the opposite of the original meaning. You wanted to be outraged so bad that you did a rhetorical 180.
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/20 04:05 PM
0

Trading one fallacy (strawman) for another (ad hominem) does not make you appear stronger. But if one word comments and a lack of self doubt make your day brighter, I’m happy to help!
/r/AntiFeminists02/07/20 01:40 PM
-6

You don’t really know what you’re trying to say and you’re owning yourself as a result. So: I saw a few men’s right activists promoting putting down women violently. Should we put everyone in the same bag then? Or is there more than one way to defend men’s rights? Is there more than one definition? Arguments matter. Don’t use cheap ones or it’ll bite you in the ass.
/r/AntiFeminists02/07/20 06:12 AM
-35

Any “forced her to have sex” google search will give you multiple instances of the same phrasing used to describe rape towards a woman. Like this one for instance : https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/manuel-ruiz-sexual-assault-trial-1.5589194 The world is not out to get you. This is not a conspiracy. You barely discovered that journalists have been using the same 100 phrasing without thinking for generations...
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/20 10:39 AM
9

You should not pay taxes or receive the product of taxes then.
/r/AntiFeminists19/06/20 09:34 AM
1

Nope, what you should have said is: ops reaction is the equivalent of pretending « black lives matter » mean « black lives matter more than white lives ». It is an interpretation of the supposed intent (« only women are affected by police violence) of the actual image (« black women are affected by police violence »). If you want to deflect my argument with a basic equivalency, this is not the one.
/r/MensRights17/06/20 12:04 PM
0

No, your reaction is the equivalent of pretending « black lives matter » mean « black lives matter more than white lives ». But good job on anchoring your bias to the short, fallacious response that seem to go your way rather than the long, argumented one that goes against your predetermined views.
/r/MensRights17/06/20 06:19 AM
-2

Where does the image say « only women blablabla, men are not victims ». You pretend here to be outraged at police, and it’s good, since it is apparently a common ground with the creator of this image. Your common enemy seems to be the police. And nowhere in this image is the word « men » mentioned. Still you choose to take it as an affront to men. Just because it affects men more, you don’t have to ban women from this feeling of outrage. Especially if this image doesn’t frame the argument in a w…
/r/MensRights16/06/20 04:55 PM
0

Inane does not mean “more than 3 words and an insult”.
/r/MensRights14/06/20 04:27 PM
0

Your inferiority complex is showing.
/r/MensRights14/06/20 03:16 PM
-10

Ah ah ah « maybe you don’t get around enough on the Internet ». I’ve worked for 6 years now on online harassment and hateful communities. I’ve written two documentaries and a full series on the subject. Why do you think I’m subscribed to all the subreddits labeled « anti-something »? I was involved in this particular discussion été having hundreds of time probably. This is not a good nor new argument but at least it is something you have in common with the other side. On the antifeminism subs: «…
/r/MensRights14/06/20 09:54 AM
-28

Do we all have to agree on the feminist boogeywoman figure? I wrote entire movies about the issues in op’s meme and never once was I attacked by this dreaded body of angry feminists... Because I never did so by saying that the inevitable corollary on men’s right was « we must take down feminism / women ». Sure, there are enough nut jobs everywhere to find wopen saying that men should die, bla-bla-bla. But shouldn’t we still be able to differentiate between nut jobs and a global idea? If we can’t…
/r/MensRights14/06/20 09:17 AM
-80

Did you even consider using it to defend something for yourself, without tearing down someone else’s fight? The fact that your first instinct is to use it « against » shows nothing but your inferiority complex. Feminism should not live rent free in your head like that, be a man and fight for women and men alike ! Oh! One last thing, I’ve taken the liberty to pre-write your whataboutist deflection for you : « Tell that to feminists, they’re the ones... »
/r/MensRights14/06/20 07:45 AM
1

The Venn diagram between masculinist and white snowflakes is a cercle.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/06/20 12:26 PM
5

How do you know it’s a woman?
/r/AntiFeminists31/05/20 10:06 AM
5

It’s pretty lame to equate technology and society.
/r/AntiFeminists30/05/20 02:17 PM
-2

I don’t expect much from antis, and then someone starts talking about brain size and my day is made.
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/20 06:04 AM
-1

Dudes, we were talking about small nuts, not thin skin. Why are you getting caught up in this game? Be secure in your beliefs for once!
/r/AntiFeminists28/05/20 10:26 PM
-11

A few is right.
/r/AntiFeminists28/05/20 09:57 PM
-11

I’m sure that in your mind, this sounded better.
/r/AntiFeminists28/05/20 09:51 PM
-23

How small are your nuts?
/r/AntiFeminists28/05/20 05:53 PM
20

You dropped this : «»
/r/AntiFeminists27/05/20 09:07 PM
4

All right, that I can see. But it’s no even close to the punchline of the meme...
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/20 02:22 PM
0

Nobody’s saying this but okay.
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/20 12:46 PM
-6

No you’re not
/r/AntiFeminists22/05/20 02:36 PM
1

Sure, there is not way that « can’t » means « are not good at ». They are clearly, CLEARLY, doing this to remind you of your dreadful victimization. Don’t worry, it’ll be winter soon enough.
/r/AntiFeminists18/05/20 11:48 AM
12

« My enemy is both weak and strong »
/r/AntiFeminists12/05/20 07:41 PM
-13

« This case doesn’t support my desire to be outraged but I FEEL LIKE I’m entitled to be outraged at an hypothetical case that could have happened to reinforce my disposition to be outraged. » This is not a « pussypass denied » but you’re acting like it is. Fragile.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/04/20 07:14 AM
-3

“Equal” is not “identical”. Your misunderstanding of the meaning of words makes your argument invalid...
/r/AntiFeminists21/04/20 11:30 AM
2

Is she a feminist?
/r/AntiFeminists18/04/20 08:09 PM
1

You’re being manipulated by the Barnum effect, as these phrases are meant to be perceived as true because you want them to be true. Same meme but with “masculinist” instead of “feminist” will be read as true by those who hate you. This means your enjoyment of this meme is not worth more than a card reading from an old Gypsie woman...
/r/AntiFeminists15/04/20 04:38 AM
3

Get over your outrage. People say that men commit the most rape, that’s it. And yes, rape is among the most violent and disturbing things so it’s only fair that this is a critical issue when dealing with men / women relationships. But I bet that you wouldn’t encourage women to claim their right to rape men when light is being shed on the fact that women can be rapist too. So stop being an hypocrite. This “argument” of yours is fallacious and you know it.
/r/AntiFeminists04/04/20 03:13 PM
-21

I too agree that there is a wage gap!
/r/AntiFeminists22/03/20 08:49 AM
-13

Oh don’t worry, I know that you don’t know. Maybe you can start your journey of economic education by considering that the world has changed a bit (well beyond women working) since the 50s. Also « everybody was happy » was the biggest laugh of the day thank you. I’m sure you can find a few people that might have complained in that time...
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/20 06:55 PM
-26

Are you saying women shouldn’t work? How many male immigrants are you planning on inviting to make up for the excess of jobs?
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/20 06:24 PM
1

So you’re saying that you prefer a woman in charge of a monarchy with a touch of slavery. Got it.
/r/AntiFeminists19/01/20 10:15 AM
-1

What the hell are you struggling to say?
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/20 01:42 PM
-10

This was... not even clever. And you disproved your point, you weren’t banned. Owning people is a very low bar in life, but you couldn’t even do that. Where is your life going man?
/r/AntiFeminists16/12/19 06:33 PM
2

Men psychological pain is less likely to be treated. Women physical pain is less likely to be treated. Both are true. Why are most commenters turning it into a feminist issue, both truth are widely documented! Sources that point at bias toward men’s mental health are the same that will tell you that women-specific pains are often being ignored.
/r/AntiFeminists19/11/19 09:33 AM
-8

I guess women can also find 6 numbers to their disadvantage... No one is winning any debate that way. It’s sad to see most posts revolve only around these figures, nothing is being built here.
/r/AntiFeminists26/09/19 10:15 PM
4

Your insecurity is showing.
/r/AntiFeminists15/07/19 03:37 PM
0

Humanity always leads to a civilization falling. Every civilization falls independently of matriarchy or patriarchy. Your postulate is as dumb as saying that all female cats die, and purposefully leaving out that the obvious corollary is that all male cats die as well. I can’t really believe that you have such a binary vision of things. I don’t know if it would be relaxing or terrifying to live like this. It sure seems debilitating but if you enjoy it well... enjoy.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 09:33 PM
-2

Then your civilization is pretty weak. Maybe it should be destroyed then? Unless you’re the type of people that advocates making the weak dependent on safe spaces and such...
/r/MensRights03/01/19 08:22 PM
-5

I was proposing to consider a statistic that is not plagued by bias. You’re talking about something else entirely. I’m talking about measuring honestly the scale of a supposed problem, you’re talking about the cause of the supposed problem. So please refrain from the dismissive “no it’s not” when you’re failing to address the issue I raised... As for your argument - which, again, is another one entirely - I think that you choose to: 1/ ignore the fact that more and more women are choosing to do …
/r/MensRights19/11/18 06:45 PM
-15

This number is pretty worthless as such (I’m assuming it is correct which I do not know for sure). The question really is: for the same job, under the same conditions, are men most susceptible to die than women? I’m guessing you don’t like when the wage gap is mentioned as a general percentage across all jobs. The interesting and unbiased number is: are women paid less than men for the same job under the same conditions. Right? So why won’t you hold yourself to the same standards?
/r/MensRights19/11/18 06:14 PM
1

Ending a conversation is not winning a conversation. You’ve achieved nothing when you do that.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 05:19 PM
2

This sub regularly rejoices when a women is jailed for having made a false rape claim. I’m not sure your math will please OP’s need for rigorous statistics...
/r/MensRights11/10/18 10:22 AM
0

Isn’t providing a false statement a felony? So it is subject to possible prosecution, the same way a rape accusation is. Do we agree on that at least? So Ford & Co. is accusing Kavanaugh of something. And You & Co. are accusing her of something else. So both are accused AND accusers at the same time. Right? Please tell me you still have the capacity of seeing that if you pass judgement on this case without an investigation, you’re not fully observing the “innocent until proven guilty” principle.…
/r/MensRights02/10/18 07:11 PM
-6

Great then but don’t upvote the “innocent until proven guilty” picture if you accuse a woman to provide a false testimony without proof that she is. That’s just saying she’s guilty until proven innocent in your mind. I’m not trying to anger you, just trying to not make you into an hypocrite.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 06:50 PM
-5

Well if the point is to not believe and accuse without proof, yes, people that pretend to have enough information to pass judgement already are lying to themselves. You might have an intuition about what’s true but how is this different from people on the other side that say “‘this woman is non-political, has a spotless record also and passed a lie detector test so that’s enough for me, I believe her”. Belief against belief, there is no winner here. Especially not the spirit of justice. What I’m…
/r/MensRights02/10/18 06:38 PM
17

Some say “I believe her”, and just as many say “I believe him”. Both are dumb as shit you’re right. The thing many people say - and it’s unclear whether you agree with that or not - is that the matter, when raised, needs to be investigated. Justice can only be blind if everyone is equal in terms of prosecution but also in terms of investigation.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 06:21 PM
3

Good argument!
/r/MensRights30/09/18 07:14 PM
1

The woman says she’s brave, which is true whether Ford is saying the truth or not (she’ll get destroyed either way). The man says she falsified her testimony, which nobody can prove at this point. I don’t think you want to be in awe of this type of “guilty until proven innocent” behavior since this sub spends its time complaining of precisely this. I would hope you would be less hypocritical...
/r/MensRights30/09/18 05:50 PM
2

Who are “they”?
/r/MensRights25/09/18 06:41 PM
6

I’m not talking about men’s rights in general, just this issue. Do you feel that nobody talks about men’s suicide rate? Or do you feel the the media/feminists/whatever lies or bends the truth to hurt men? Édit: I guess the reason this issue is troubling to me is that higher suicide rates don’t necessarily means that men are oppressed more than women. It might but this higher rate could also be attributed to other factors - like men being less likely to seek professional help in times of depressi…
/r/MensRights14/09/18 04:30 PM
9

Can someone explain to me why this topic is always considered unfair here? Honest question. I get that more men commit suicide but how does it translate into being victimized by [women, media, politics, something else] ? Thanks
/r/MensRights14/09/18 03:24 PM
3

Nowhere in this article does she claim that “he is adult so consent was automatic”. Maybe you read that elsewhere? Also, how is this proof of different rules for men and women since she was investigated and suspended?
/r/MensRights16/08/18 10:22 AM
-15

It is sadly a fact of many wars that young boys are killed (to avoid creating a new generation of enemy fighters) and women are raped and captured. I understand feeling sad about this, however it is not specific to that attack. Yet you try to link that fact to a popular hashtag as a way to further the idea as men being victims. This is pretty cynical, but let’s attribute that on being shocked and broken. Maybe if you try to remove your men/women polarized glasses, you’d just see that war is a tr…
/r/MensRights02/08/18 08:26 AM
-1

People creating a fake email? People spreading fakes? People not fact checking anything as long as it fits their existing views? People reacting with outrage anytime they think they are being victimized? Who are you talking about?
/r/MensRights15/05/18 03:00 AM
1

It may be real, it may be not. But it was easier to get outraged than getting the facts right. Feeling victimized is what keeps the community tight so let’s screech now and there’s a chance we’ll be right. Maybe. We don’t know. We don’t care.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 02:14 AM
1

I don’t see where I tried to define you and assume who you are, sorry if I offended you personnally. You do show a bit a hypocrisy as you’ve called me a troll and insane but let’s move past this. Let’s also move past the “you’ve called us radicals”, when I actually talked about radicalization as a trend in opposing communities. I understand that you perceive the word radicalized as pejorative (I don’t) that’s why I’ve stopped using it in favor of polarized. Still you can’t seem to see this effor…
/r/MensRights30/04/18 12:33 PM
0

I’ll just point out that I never claimed knowing everything about accounting. I merely responded when accounting was suddenly a thing in a discussion that was previously about polarization in society and online community. I must admit I didn’t see the connection but I followed you guys since it seemed important to you. I hope you can see I never claimed to be all knowing... Accounting is clearly important enough for you to ask that I stop talking to you. I will do as you wish since this is your …
/r/MensRights30/04/18 12:04 PM
1

You’ve asked that I stop talking to you so I’ll stop. Thanks for engaging (although the anger does not help your case).
/r/MensRights30/04/18 11:44 AM
1

The topic was (and is developing somehow in other comments) that this battle of numbers is sterile and will never reach across the « aisle ». That it benefits a few gurus and politicians while two polarized sides spend time arguing who is absolutely right and who is absolutely wrong. So this was the topic: polarization and instrumentalization. I agree that it was off topic from the OP but it was in itself a topic. In retrospect, most things on this sub (and, once again, on feminists subs) aim at…
/r/MensRights30/04/18 10:23 AM
0

There is a difference between saying « nothing is real » and « something becomes a fact only when you’ve questioned the bias behind the proposed fact ». Once again, dismissing an opposing point through exaggeration does not prove you right... Plus, it’s absurd to be this defensive when I’m actually defending what some commenters here have been doing by trying to expose bias in the 60 minutes video. Are you so entrenched in this vision of a contradictor being the enemy that you can’t see when I p…
/r/MensRights30/04/18 09:39 AM
1

It’s amazing how you can feel superior (we’re better than feminists) and victimized at the same time! I’ve proposed a topic and you’ve only ever brought feelings in response. Hate, troll, better, worse... This is not a place for debate but discussion. There is a nuance and the fact that contradiction is perceived as an attack and immediately dismissed as trolling shows this. It’s fine to have a safe place where you can discuss among like-minded people. But where is your space for intelligent con…
/r/MensRights30/04/18 09:29 AM
-1

They wouldn’t be required if numbers could not be bent... Same thing apply to fact checkers in politics or news, if any number is fact, why do they exist? Once again, blind faith in numbers only serves your existing views and dominant people, not the democratic debate.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 09:10 AM
-2

I strongly disagree. Numbers can be bent in accounting as well as in statistical analysis... Remember the whole Greece bankruptcy / Goldman Sachs fudging the numbers thing? (along millions of cases of account manipulation) When presenting numbers, you always can choose to stress something and hide another. And someone with an opposing intent will probably do the opposite... When doing a survey, field research, paneling, phrasing, calculations and visualizations are sources of subjectivity. They …
/r/MensRights30/04/18 08:58 AM
0

You only responded to the one thing concerning you. Do you see how this is ironic when my lengthy post basically told you that you were cherry picking facts and arguments to fit your bias? I have no way of knowing if you’re an expert and it doesn’t matter here. Plus your reputation is not at stake because I live in another continent and I DON’T KNOW YOU. So maybe you can stop with the defensiveness and try and react to the rest of my points. Or ignore me from now on, that’s your right. But pleas…
/r/MensRights30/04/18 08:02 AM
1

I’ll keep doing that... And you will keep doing what you already do. You’ll keep bringing up the world “hate” unprompted (confusing it with radicalization and anger by the way) and using reductio ad absurdum to cut any potential conversation short. I never said I saw hate here (twice now), I never said my thoughts were so grand they would change how people think. But if you’d let go of the exaggeration and try and engage you might have progressed in some aspect of your reasoning and so might I h…
/r/MensRights30/04/18 07:48 AM
1

Never said you hated me, I am just not on your side or on what you perceive to be the enemy side... I have no personal involvement in this pseudo battle for income (in)equality. I just watch communities form and radicalize and I find it sad. Pity me all you want but you seem to consume just as much time dividing as I do pointing it out. I just think each community needs to take a step back from memes and blind reinforcement once in a while...
/r/MensRights30/04/18 06:49 AM
-3

Good for you! It’s important for an analyst to pick and choose the facts that fits your employers bias. And you apply the same technique to your forum life, yeah! One fact doesn’t disproves a trend, and one distorted statistics isn’t more virtuous than other distorted statistics. Your point about lowest income does not inform us about average income. It is a fallacy and maybe your expert friends can explain this one. This battle of tortured numbers only benefits ideologues and interest groups an…
/r/MensRights29/04/18 10:57 PM
-8

Assumptions are not your friends... But that’s the problem with emotional people trying to appear rational through bent statistics. Thing is, feminist extremist have the same issue... Have fun with the anger, this other side is also getting angrier and stronger while you keep developing irreconcilable “facts” on each side. You’re turning your own lives into a spinning wheel of victimization and hatred, but go on if that’s what defines you now... Better this than the void right?
/r/MensRights29/04/18 04:24 PM
-8

Yes! Everybody lies but us! Numbers can only be interpreted one way and ours is the right one!
/r/MensRights29/04/18 04:03 PM
3

Yes! No man has ever left a disabled woman! Shame! Shame!
/r/MensRights20/04/18 06:01 AM
2

Good, he’s definitely innocent then! No doubt no doubt.,.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 04:23 PM
-4

Yes! There are only three things of importance in the world: no rape culture, no wage gap and no justice for men. I’m proud that this sub is only dedicated to those same three things, over and over. Everything else is garbage, fake, false or dangerously nuanced!!!
/r/MensRights03/04/18 07:38 PM
-21

Absolutely not sorry, this is still a gross exaggeration. In the USA: 4.8 million women versus 2.9 million men. It is truly sad that most posts here appear to be designed to reinforce preconceived (and sometimes utterly false) ideas rather than developing truthful and original arguments. Anyways I’m just a unconvinced lurker here so I don’t really matter in this community, I just don’t like easily disproved statistics...
/r/MensRights13/03/18 11:38 PM
-23

This number is wrong in every country in the world. It is true that men are also victims of domestic abuse but in smaller proportion. So why do you feel the need to exaggerate to make a point? Can’t you argue something without memes and deception? Or maybe are you just looking for blind validation and upvotes?
/r/MensRights13/03/18 11:28 PM
0

Not giving a credible source for a statement cannot be considered proof... it’s just hearsay at this point. Maybe you expect me to go look for myself but I’m sorry to say that you would be a lot more convincing if you took the time to actually provide the proof. Have a good day!
/r/MensRights15/12/17 10:17 PM
1

I’m not particularly triggered but I’m eager for actual facts, not just people saying « Hilary said » and then dodging the call for proof and blindly screaming « fact, triggered!!! ». Guess I won’t find answers with you, I’ll look elsewhere for enlightenment.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 09:17 PM
-1

Fighting bias with bias then? Also, link to a direct and exact quote for both them? Searched for 5 minutes online and never found anything like this...
/r/MensRights15/12/17 08:20 PM
-6

Do you also create a post for each time such a claim happens to be true? Just trying to understand what this proves...
/r/MensRights15/12/17 08:17 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter