poof-its-gone Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
6	Circumciscion Which is BS anyway. Some men naturally can't retract until their mid teens as part of normal development. Only 85% of teen boys can retract at age 15. 95% at age 16. Phimosis isn't supposed to be diagnosed until age 17 or 18. It makes me pretty disappointed in my field that little boys are still being put through a false diagnosis and unnecessary surgery, and the only explanation I can think of is either the doctor is looking to make a few hundred quick extra bucks, or is too lazy to educate the…	/r/MGTOW	04/01/16 05:26 PM
5	Woman commits felony, kidnaps child, denies father custody, gets a slap on the wrist. Twist of fate, she actually did it to protect the boy from being mutilated. What's your opinion? The judicial system should never mandate a surgery like that. Children aren't property, we can't just trim them up to fit our tastes.	/r/MensRights	28/12/15 02:12 PM
1	Are there any support networks/groups for men who suffer anxiety, depression, etc. because of their circumcision? You basically told the OP to suck it up and deal with it, which is the same kind of callous disregard for men's well-being that many are frustrated about on this sub. Cutting off a part of a man's penis is bodily assault, whether you personally feel strongly about it or not. Yet you'd rather sit here and derail the discussion of the issue and it's fixes by insinuating that the OP is just weak and silly for caring.	/r/MensRights	28/12/15 03:54 AM
1	Are there any support networks/groups for men who suffer anxiety, depression, etc. because of their circumcision? Dude. You completely missed my point.	/r/MensRights	28/12/15 03:39 AM
2	Are there any support networks/groups for men who suffer anxiety, depression, etc. because of their circumcision? It's not wrong to be angry about someone having done you wrong. It's not wrong to look at the circumstances (in this case systematic, medicalized damage to the genitals of one sex) and try to change those circumstances so that someone else doesn't have their sex life damaged by it. It's not wrong to make a huge effing deal about it when the majority of people around you see nothing wrong with it. Now, most people don't consider it as severe an offense as rape, but take that for example. What if …	/r/MensRights	28/12/15 03:22 AM
3	88 Things Men Hear In A Lifetime Modern male circumcision (as in, post 140 AD) was openly intended to reduce sexual pleasure for males and females. Any benefits are largely disproven, and don't remotely outweigh the harm of perpetuating a procedure designed to take away sexual pleasure. Nobody looks at female genital mutilation and tries to study benefits of the procedure in order to try and justify it.	/r/MensRights	13/12/15 03:19 AM
2	88 Things Men Hear In A Lifetime Forgive the assumption then. My husband's foreskin is more sensitive than the head of his penis. Lube or not, the shape of a circumcised penis causes a "shovel" action, which pushes lubricating fluids out of the vagina. There's more than one reason why having a foreskin = less friction. Besides, if you want to be circumcised, you can be at any point you wish. Someone who has had it forced on them is stuck with their cut penis forever, barring years of restoration to only get it partly back. Ther…	/r/MensRights	12/12/15 07:19 PM
14	88 Things Men Hear In A Lifetime No, female genital mutilation varies widely between types, ranging from no more than a scrape or pinprick, all the way to clitoris removal and infibulation. Some of it is worse, but even the clearly less bad things like a ritual pinprick are banned basically everywhere. If a forced ritual pinprick is female genital mutilation, then forced foreskin removal is male genital mutilation.	/r/MensRights	12/12/15 06:58 PM
5	88 Things Men Hear In A Lifetime Right yeah. I've always noticed how the majority of people calling a foreskin "useless" are the ones who have never experienced having one. The vast majority of men who actually know what it's like would not give theirs up. It doesn't only give sensation, it also reduces friction during penetration, making sex more comfortable for the female partner. It's not useless, and you can't honestly say it is if you've never even experienced it.	/r/MensRights	12/12/15 06:55 PM
2	Male Genital Mutilation (MGM) (Circumcision) If we cover that up or tiptoe around it to spare someone's feelings, it'll never stop.	/r/MensRights	08/12/15 03:59 PM
3	Male Genital Mutilation (MGM) (Circumcision) Certainly not, and that's a good thing. My husband's foreskin is more sensitive than the head of his penis. I can't imagine sex would be as good without it, only I wouldn't know to blame circumcision for it. I'm sure it doesn't matter to everyone, and I'm not saying it always turns out bad, but it has to be hurting a lot of people.	/r/MensRights	08/12/15 03:10 PM
5	Male Genital Mutilation (MGM) (Circumcision) The procedure is designed to hurt sexual pleasure. It's not a stretch to say a whole lot of men have most likely been hurt by the procedure. However, just like with some less severe forms of FGM, there may be a few who haven't, some who don't know they have, and some who will ardently defend the practice to avoid admitting something bad happened to them. When you think about what was written about the more recent, more invasive form of circumcision, how it was openly supposed to "make a man mode…	/r/MensRights	07/12/15 06:28 PM
6	Male Genital Mutilation (MGM) (Circumcision) There's nothing wrong with being circumcised, or choosing to be circumcised. There's a whole lot of things wrong with thinking it's ok to do it to someone else though.	/r/MensRights	07/12/15 05:54 PM