TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

poolerboy0077 Archive

View 0 posts and 58 comments by poolerboy0077 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I ain’t even a girl and I’d trample over y’all to suck his dick.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/19 04:36 PM
2

No real career? The guy collaborated with popular artists for the better part of a decade and has a net worth of over $260 million. All the other stuff you said was true, though.
/r/MGTOW22/03/19 03:17 PM
1

There's a time and a place for everything. I think that’s missing the forest for the trees. The issue isn’t so much about an employee ruining your good time by going on and on about their personal life. The same issue Terry brought up would occur if the striptease patron would reflect all by himself on the fact that she has kids and whatnot and the outcome would be the same. The issue here is that knowing actor’s life doesn’t ruin the movie or play for you in a way that reflecting on the fact th…
/r/MensRights22/04/18 03:27 PM
3

Am I supposed to be "..contemplating on the fact that that person is someone's son or daughter to be valued and respected" at every such interaction? Not at every interaction, no, but that wasn't what I was getting at. My point isn't that we have to see a fully fleshed-out human being at every turn and at every waking moment or forbid free and voluntary transactions. Rather, my point is that recurring thoughts, acts and communication produce effects, many times negative. If a wealthy person ordi…
/r/MensRights21/04/18 10:29 PM
-1

But is there something to be said about the way we tend to organize our comforts and relaxations based upon the suppression of the details of another's life? I feel like the point Terry is making—as inept as many on here think the execution was—is about potential effects produced as a result of this. If, say, one sees one's intimate conquests as nothing more than one's desire to climax and then move onto the next person without ever contemplating on the fact that that person is someone's son or …
/r/MensRights21/04/18 09:13 PM
-11

I’m not either but their life certainly doesn’t ruin the play for me. There’s something about escaping all context and just focusing on the aesthetics that seems to occur when one enjoys a strip tease. Knowing that they (strippers, porn stars, etc.) have kids ruins it for many. Why? Is it because they’re no longer just a pretty thing to look at? One could make the same argument when eating meat—that in our focus on the pleasures of our palate we conventionally tune out the suffering of what we c…
/r/MensRights21/04/18 05:30 PM
-4

I know that’s the reactionary response on this subreddit, to point out a perceived gendered double standard, but it actually avoids the question. Whether a man does it to a woman or vice versa, in what sense is the person who is bothered by a stripper revealing their life not bothered because they’re in a way revealing their humanity? Are they being bothered for some other reason?
/r/MensRights21/04/18 05:21 PM
9

What’s your reaction to his statement about becoming bothered by strippers who ruin the moment when revealing aspects of their life?
/r/MensRights21/04/18 05:11 PM
1

men are the primary victims of violent assault. Based on what? Consider if this was a whites-only initiative. Are you also outraged that blind people are prohibited from driving? They're being excluded! The discrimination!
/r/MensRights08/10/17 02:10 AM
1

What on earth are you going on about? Not only am I not going to concede your bald assertion, you're not even in the realm of relevance to what's being discussed. That, say, a man may have a higher chance of getting ass raped in prison bears zero relevance to the issue in Mexico City metros. It's an accommodation that you're upset about because we're not approaching the issue with some contrived equality stripped of any context.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 12:53 PM
1

Are men more at risk for sexual assault in Mexico City's metros than women?
/r/MensRights07/10/17 05:02 AM
2

You know why? Because sexual harassment and accosting is unequal, with most of the predation being perpetrated by men.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 03:36 AM
2

If it were intended to be fair, they would provide transport for the people discriminated against. They do. It's only a closed off section so that the women, if they so choose, ride in a separate cabin.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 04:53 PM
1

Go out with a few buddies who aren't diehard progressives, Maybe you've inadvertently hit the nail on the head. This divide seems to be ideological, and not because of some veneer of coming across progressive but genuinely not caring. I certainly don't. I mean, why would I?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/17 06:45 PM
1

It's weird how he insists on how she felt and doesn't mention how he felt. Men and women have different sexual cues. A man's sexual cues are external, relating to how the other person looks and feels and responds. A woman by contrast has both external cues but internal as well, and her sexuality is often egotistical and how they subjectively feel.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/17 06:27 PM
1

Because what he said is completely unattractive. To a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/17 06:22 PM
1

Gay men groom well and seem to want to fuck a relatively high percentage of one another. Because gay men have so many options. These two things are not mutually exclusive. Gay men, at least based on CDC statistics, have higher frequency of sex and more sex partners, because sexuality in gay men functions similarly to straight men, it's just that women tend not to do all the things straight men want women to do, so they don't get laid as much by comparison nor engage in riskier practices. Lesbian…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 02:30 AM
1

Straight woman here and I agree with the OP. Not because men are ugly by default Well, then, you don't really agree with the OP, because he explicitly said that this is true without all the added effort to better one's appearance. He said that, all else being equal (which would include effort in fashion and blemish control), women are prettier.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 02:22 AM
2

Even the men attracted to men admitted that women were simplified more aesthetically pleasing. Admitted where? Who? I think it's easier to focus on women's fashion because there's more to don on a woman than a man. Look at the Oscars for instance, or really any ball or elegant party. The women have an assortment of things to choose from. For men it's a limited variety of tuxedos, and wrist watches. It might also be a kind of vicarious attitude about them. Many effeminate gay men love "strong" wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 02:18 AM
1

I doubt it is largely to do with upbringing. It seems to be innate in us men. Take gay men for instance. Gay men are not taught to be promiscuous; if anything, the opposite is reinforced: that gay men ought to be eunuchs. And yet promiscuity persists, because gay men are men.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 08:05 PM
2

What if we get a feminist author who makes an annoying point about it, like somehow tying it back to women's struggles? http://nymag.com/thecut/2016/03/wentworth-miller-fat-shaming.html
/r/MensRights30/03/16 03:17 AM
1

Conversely Red Pill cares more about criticising Es Jay Dubyas, convincing themselves that they're the reason why they don't get laid, and figuring out ways to become phony douchebags and assholes just so they can bust a nut.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/16 05:59 PM
1

Well, saying gay men are extremely visual is different from saying that a gay couple doubles the visuals. From your first comment I thought you meant that a singular gay man was more visual than a singular straight man.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/15 04:06 PM
1

"Jesus.... Please kill me before I ever look like obamacare boy." I feel exactly the same way. I smell an insecure beta. Probably should just an hero.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/15 08:22 PM
1

Men are visual, gay men are EXTREMELY visual. Why do you suspect that gay men are much more visual than straight men?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/15 08:17 PM
1

And that's because we're guys, not because we're gay. Otherwise lesbians should be equally promiscuous. The only reason straight men aren't getting laid as much is because women are difficult.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/15 08:15 PM
1

You and the OP are confusing female interests with those of gay men. It's understandable. After all, they both like males. But gay men, like straight men, are predominantly visual. They don't really care about alpha male qualities such as if you're successful in your life, if you're a protector or provider, if you're charismatic, if you're highly regarded among your peers, etc. The interest, rather, is purely in how you come across for aesthetic reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/15 08:06 PM
1

Men are just too hairy :( Justin Bieber isn't hairy. inb4 "But he's a lesbian. hurrrr." No but seriously. Look up the term "twink." Not all men are hairy.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/15 08:04 PM
1

Twinks are a body type, not a personality. Masculinity isn't just about having muscle. You can be an effeminate bear or someone with a "swimmers build" and be masculine.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/15 08:01 PM
1

Please. The only difference between a straight man and a gay one is a six pack of beer.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/15 03:03 AM
1

I should start a charity: Blow A Straight Guy I would do this purely for altruistic reasons
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/15 10:43 PM
1

The sluts I've met are the unhappiest people I've ever known. The sluts you've met are women. Gay men are plenty happy in this department, aside from the high risks of STDs. Once we figure this out, we'll be superior beings to your breeders, laughing at your relational incompatibility for our amusement.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/15 03:03 AM
1

It's not about whether the women want it or not, it's about how nice it would be to have that easy command while retaining the high desire for frequency of casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/15 02:37 AM
2

Jesus. I should've been thankful I'm gay for Thanksgiving. I feel like if I were straight I'd still be a virgin.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/15 02:22 AM
1

Is this assumption that women has less casual sex because they're slut shamed? If so, then you'd have to account for the frequency rates of sex of gay men. Gay men have been slut shamed (and worse) and that did not deter us from having copious amounts of sex or creating a large body of porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/15 02:20 AM
2

Maybe most women can easily have casual sex whenever they want, but the fact of the matter is that most of them don't WANT that. Yeah but that doesn't take away from the envy by males. Because most males do want frequent casual sex, it's frustrating to see this (likely innate) imbalance. Moreover, if most women don't want casual sex, what does that do for the men wanting casual sex? This leads to sexual frustration, and subsequently douchey albeit ingenious tactics to get that said sex (e.g., pi…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/15 02:18 AM
1

And vice versa, there are many women who will easily put out, but he's not willing to bang a whale. So both sexes are back at square one, neither budging but simultaneously dismissing the other's hardships.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/15 02:14 AM
1

Then clearly there's a reading comprehension problem. No one is denying service to anyone.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 06:16 PM
1

Yeah, I'm not buying it. This is just anecdotal but I've come across many women who are just put off by the fact that a guy they liked merely just kissed another guy, even if he was just experimenting and wasn't bisexual. A lot of them have huge hang-ups about this kind of stuff. My best friend recently told me that after his girlfriend told him that she had lots of lesbians friends back in New York, he asked her if she ever had a relationship with a woman. She gave him a look of huge disapprova…
/r/MensRights29/11/15 07:04 AM
1

I do believe that gay men can and do rape women which is why I commented on that. How often do you think this occurs, such that we should be giving it our undivided attention? And what is the likelihood that it's being done because they are women.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 06:51 AM
0

I just don't think jumping on the "safe space" bandwagon and insisting on bully-proof windows and troll-safe doors is what we should be doing in this sub. Perhaps you've been reading too much KotakuInAction and TheRedPill because no one is arguing this here. The reference to safe spaces isn't being made in a college lefty sort of way, but rather as a real separation from cringeworthy antagonism and stigma. It's also not a double-standard to ask to be treated with dignity and afforded the most ba…
/r/MensRights29/11/15 06:43 AM
0

It is open to the public. That's not the point of the article. Did you even read it? "This intensifying turf war does not spring from hetero-phobia. And it’s not about straight people showing up in gay bars in general. It’s about straight people behaving badly in gay bars, arriving in balance-tipping throngs and turning pseudo-sex clubs into silly dance halls, drag shows into disrespectful free-for-alls, and quiet lounges into scream-filled shot dispensaries."
/r/MensRights29/11/15 06:32 AM
1

Not much I assume since these places aren't banning women or any service to them on the basis of their sexual orientation.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 06:27 AM
1

Actually, one guy did tell them no, at least in a specific sort of way. The owner of The Abbey, one of the most famous gay bars in West Hollywood, told patrons back before California allowed gay marriage that they were shutting down bachelorettes parties. Apparently many women thought it would be tasteful to host their bachelorette parties at gay bars -- bars which specifically cater to a demographic at the time not allowed to marry. Talk about rubbing it one's face. So while women were not bann…
/r/MensRights29/11/15 06:17 AM
1

Exactly my point
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 06:04 AM
1

So you're not living freely because of the (arbitrary and irrational) policing you'll receive from straight men? Gawd I'm so glad to be gay. It's incredible the way straight men and women cock and vag block each other and then point the finger at the other as the cause of their misery. Sheesh
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 05:51 AM
1

Gay men are unpicky? You clearly don't know gay men. In fact, what OP said about women applies here too. Because gay men are men and it doesn't take all that much to hook up with one, you tend to be picky about who you'll sleep with sex is so easily thrown at you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 05:47 AM
2

I highly doubt we gay men have higher libidos than straight men. It's just that we have more sex and enjoy it more because it doesn't take much to hook up with another guy. If homosexuality were what makes someone super horny, what explains lesbians? Exactly.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 05:44 AM
1

Most proponents appear like whiny, bitter juveniles, which doesn't really help in the self-improvement department IMO.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 05:37 AM
1

So if a guy is interested in women primarily for her looks, that's just a guy being a guy. But if a women also exhibits shallowness but in a different way (for evolutionary reasons), she's a gold digging whore! Sounds to me like the ramblings of a guy with a chip on the ol' shoulder. Can we just admit that both parties are equally baboon-like and be done with it?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 05:33 AM
1

I tend to bust a nut really quickly when I'm very excited and incredibly turned on. So...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 05:30 AM
3

Pepper spray her.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 05:26 AM
1

Both internal and external (albeit, non-visual) sexual cues as those described at length in the youtube video I linked.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 08:38 PM
1

That holds for many gay men and yet pornography is still a thing. According to the CDC, gay men have more frequency of sex and more sex partners than their heterosexual counterparts, presumably because it doesn't take too much effort to get a guy to have sex. And yet pornorgraphy is viewed quite a lot and lots of it gets produced. Your comment also rests on a faulty assumption that pornorgraphy is only or predominantly viewed by single guys who cannot get laid. Do you realize many couples also v…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 08:28 PM
1

If it's highly visual what explains the disparity in pornography viewership? And what do you disagree in this researcher's findings: http://youtu.be/p-A8GvUehq4
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 07:46 PM
1

Sexual attraction for men is highly visual and physical. This is not really the case for women. Look up neuroscientist Ogi Ogas' Google Talks for elaboration on this. It's quite interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 04:40 PM
1

Yes. Justin Bieber is absolutely gorgeous. All other men are waste of sperm by comparison.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 04:32 PM
1

Women are not as look obsessed in their sexual attraction as guys are. I'm not saying they don't care at all, but it's more common to see a really hot woman with a mediocre looking male than vice versa.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 04:28 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter