TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

popmyshit Archive

View 0 posts and 44 comments by popmyshit on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Bro you are the uncalibrated one
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 03:36 PM
8

Then stop having them?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 06:42 AM
1

When you’re physically attractive people will be physically attracted to you? STOP THE PRESSES
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 01:46 PM
2

Yes That’s why I said ‘in this example’
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 08:26 PM
5

What? Men being used for sex would feel the same way. It’s just a much more intimate feeling than someone paying for your food
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 03:21 PM
19

May have to do with the fact that in this example the men are used for materialistic purposes, sort of like being scammed - whereas being used for your body could be much more impactful mentally
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 08:14 AM
1

This isn’t a separate court system it’s literally a statistical specification
/r/MensRights02/01/22 03:48 PM
-9

Welcome! I guess you’re new
/r/MensRights02/01/22 11:47 AM
1

How did you reach that conclusion?
/r/AntiFeminists02/01/22 08:18 AM
-1

These are literally the same talking points going around r/conspiracy which we can all agree is anything but a feminist sub. The general idea is to also hold the clients accountable. the top comment on that post: “That is infuriating to me. Of course all the women involved must rot in prison: they are awful criminals that committed terrible crimes... But it's infuriating that the men are walking free, hiding in their multimillion dollar houses even though they are also awful criminals that also …
/r/AntiFeminists02/01/22 08:04 AM
0

Well in this case since we’re comparing, I’ll rephrase to ‘does it happen often enough to be statistically & quantitively significant to warrant a separate declination?’
/r/MensRights01/01/22 10:01 PM
-1

does that happen often?
/r/MensRights01/01/22 09:52 PM
0

how exactly?
/r/MensRights01/01/22 07:05 PM
0

Oh okay sorry my bad let me try this: After careful consideration and understanding to the best of my ability of the facts presented to me herein, I have reached the conclusion that the implementation of this legal distinction serves to differentiate between criminal activity motivated by the basis of gender, comparable to that which would be motivated by colour, sexuality, or religious affiliation of the individual in question. Kind regards,
/r/MensRights01/01/22 11:02 AM
0

Seems to me like it’s an added criminal distinction similar to crime motivated by colour religious affiliation sexuality (& eventually gender) but whatever ig
/r/MensRights01/01/22 10:41 AM
0

Seems like it’s more about trying gender based violence separately vs reducing violence against women
/r/MensRights01/01/22 10:28 AM
1

yall will be happy to have hygiene products but use the same towel for your face and ballsack & hand soap on your face
/r/MensRights01/01/22 10:24 AM
-1

Which is?
/r/MensRights01/01/22 10:16 AM
1

I assume they would use the same methods they currently use to find motive behind any other crime
/r/MensRights01/01/22 08:51 AM
-3

“Since 2003 Spain has logged killings as gender violence if there is evidence that the killer and the victim had been or were in a relationship. From Saturday 1 January the definition of gender violence will be broadened to include the murder of any woman or children in which gender is deemed to have played a role.” Sounds fine to me?
/r/MensRights01/01/22 08:50 AM
0

what..
/r/MensRights31/12/21 11:15 PM
0

where does it mention women?
/r/MensRights31/12/21 10:06 PM
0

the actual translation that isn’t changed slightly to push an agenda: ‘But there are some people who don’t believe in vaccination’ [lady: “who are extremists”] ‘who don’t believe in science, who are often misogynists, who are often racist as well, it’s a small group but they take up space [read: are loud]” But anyway yeah relation to anti feminism?
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/21 06:03 PM
1

In this instance we’re not talking about consent withdrawn after the fact, since it happens so rarely it’s moot and you’re framing it as primary in bad faith. Also lmao ‘teach women to give consent’? Mate if you can’t tell whether or not someone 100% wants to have sex with you I’m concerned about you Women tend to have a better understanding of consent since, you know, they’re literally raised to always be weary and careful and explicit and direct. Would it make you feel less like a big baby if …
/r/MensRights31/12/21 05:25 PM
-16

because the main idea regarding the draft is most feminist academia is abolishing the draft entirely
/r/MensRights31/12/21 05:14 PM
5

Men’s rights to… not pump gas?
/r/MensRights31/12/21 05:11 PM
1

Brother did you miss the part where someone in another comment and I were discussing consent and they presented that if the woman doesn’t say anything, doesn’t give any feedback, & doesn’t resist, then it’s not rape? I don’t care how many articles you link, there is a genuine problem with the overall understanding of consent and if you take your eyes off the screen for a second and talk to some real human beings you’ll see it too. Discussing consent hurts absolutely no one but insecure fragile m…
/r/MensRights31/12/21 05:09 PM
0

Dude, it’s really not that deep. It’s not about painting all men as rapists, it’s about explaining consent like I said a couple of times already. You saying it paints all men as rapists is equivalent to saying don’t teach anyone about the law because it would paint everyone as a criminal. Doesn’t make much sense does it mate?
/r/MensRights31/12/21 04:40 PM
2

?
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/21 01:35 PM
1

for me it should be obvious It’s not. Hence this statement being a thing. your perspective that people won’t listen so what’s the point (???) is honestly concerning
/r/MensRights31/12/21 01:10 PM
1

if you don’t disagree with that then why tf do you hate that statement when it obviously applies to mitigate/avoid/reduce the chances of any abuse happening as opposed to trying to ‘correct’ perpetrators?
/r/MensRights31/12/21 12:27 PM
0

teach not to rape isn’t just saying ‘hey rape is bad okay?’, it’s about explaining consent, lack there of, and the different degrees & variants of sexual assault. No well rounded mentally sound human being of any gender would in all seriousness disagree with the importance of having regular conversations surrounding consent, consensual sexual activity & relations, and the limits/possible boundaries of the latter. Case in fucking point: the person in another comment saying that if she says no but…
/r/MensRights31/12/21 11:17 AM
0

“Teach men not to rape”… in the post…
/r/MensRights31/12/21 05:46 AM
2

wtf? if you think the only way to get consent is to explicitly ask for permission to have sex then what the hell is your social life like? No response, ‘laying there and not saying anything’ is absolutely not a sign of consent how the hell is this even a debate? It’s really not that hard to tell if someone wants to have sex with you or not
/r/MensRights30/12/21 11:13 PM
-3

Literally your first sentence shows how important drilling this is.putting aside the fact that you’ve compared men to dogs twice so far Opportunistic/‘instinctive’ sexual assault is the ONLY kind that can be avoided by drilling the core responsibility on perpetrators, NOT victims. So the ones you mention, premeditated and planned, are moot I’m also not going to bother reading the rest of what you wrote after that cute victim blaming paragraph. Let me guess, leaving your windows open and getting …
/r/MensRights30/12/21 11:08 PM
2

… because there’s no consent?? if someone fucks a person while they sleep or are unconscious, is it not rape bc they didn’t say no?
/r/MensRights30/12/21 10:55 PM
-3

is there a difference between male and female rapists Well yeah one is committed by men and the other is committed by women..? teaching stray dogs not to attack people I’d use a more apt comparison of another human crime, maybe like robbery or assault? To which you know there are laws against, and morals against theft of personal property & violence are drilled into people, so I don’t see why it would be different with sexual assault men and women both need to learn self defence Well, no ones sa…
/r/MensRights30/12/21 10:47 PM
-15

yeah I agree but since we’re talking about male on female what’s the relevance?
/r/MensRights30/12/21 10:09 PM
-8

fairly safe to assume that most people know that rape is bad
/r/MensRights30/12/21 08:35 PM
-19

In the United States, the Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN) has reported that 45 percent of sexual assaults are committed by an acquaintance and an additional 25 percent by a current or former intimate partner. note: violent gun-to-your-head rape is not the only kind nor is if the most common “The thing with criminals is” those who sexually assault others don’t tend to fit into a criminal archetype “The predator is looking for an easy target” rape being an opportunistic crime is why …
/r/MensRights30/12/21 07:26 PM
1

I’m gonna go out on a limb and guess it has to do with you saying their rule 2 was sexist
/r/AntiFeminists30/12/21 08:12 AM
1

what does this have to do with anti feminism?
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/21 08:25 AM
1

oh boy have I got news for you
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/21 06:46 AM
0

I’m not a feminist. submitted 23 hours AITA for telling my brother he’s sexist. submitted 1 day lmfao
/r/AntiFeminists28/12/21 09:51 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter