TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

porkchop_d_clown Archive

View 61 posts and 209 comments by porkchop_d_clown on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1064

Social Issuesporkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights07/07/15 03:23 PM
683

porkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights12/02/12 04:25 PM
345

porkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights28/02/14 04:16 PM
321

Legal Rightsporkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights18/05/15 05:35 PM
177

porkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights26/05/13 11:09 PM
169

porkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights01/06/11 01:58 PM
151

Social Issuesporkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights19/05/15 01:22 PM
143

porkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights04/08/14 01:28 AM
135

porkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights08/09/13 12:40 AM
123

porkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights19/03/13 11:10 AM
120

WBBporkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights31/10/14 02:55 PM
116

False Accusationporkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights12/05/15 06:20 PM
116

Feminismporkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights07/10/15 05:35 PM
100

Social Issuesporkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights01/06/15 07:57 PM
100

porkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights26/06/12 07:25 PM
88

Outrageporkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights15/01/15 04:16 PM
87

porkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights23/04/15 03:22 PM
74

porkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights21/04/15 04:07 PM
71

WBBporkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights30/09/14 11:50 AM
69

porkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights17/01/13 02:30 AM
67

Analysisporkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights13/12/14 06:57 PM
63

porkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights23/07/13 06:43 PM
61

Storyporkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights05/08/14 08:11 PM
60

Social Issuesporkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights18/07/15 04:29 PM
59

Discriminationporkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights21/05/15 05:34 PM
58

porkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights09/04/15 06:15 PM
57

porkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights04/04/11 02:37 PM
51

False Accusationporkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights20/06/15 03:49 PM
49

Outrageporkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights15/06/14 05:09 PM
47

Social Issuesporkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights25/05/15 01:00 AM
42

porkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights26/11/12 09:26 PM
36

Analysisporkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights14/11/14 01:57 AM
35

porkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights07/06/14 10:25 AM
34

Social Issuesporkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights25/05/15 01:03 AM
31

False Accusationporkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights22/01/16 02:45 AM
30

Progressporkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights05/02/15 03:52 PM
29

Social Issuesporkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights01/10/15 04:58 PM
28

porkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights01/03/11 12:40 PM
27

porkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights17/02/11 03:01 PM
25

porkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights09/06/12 12:59 AM
21

Blogs/Videoporkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights18/07/14 11:11 AM
17

Analysisporkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights14/01/15 06:16 PM
17

porkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights04/07/13 04:28 PM
16

Feminismporkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights28/06/15 11:25 PM
16

Social Issuesporkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights03/06/15 10:36 AM
16

porkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights06/01/12 04:42 PM
12

Social Issuesporkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights30/10/15 07:11 PM
10

porkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights01/07/11 11:56 AM
10

WBBporkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights17/09/14 06:53 PM
8

False Accusationsporkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights11/03/15 12:54 AM
7

Newsporkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights09/02/15 06:43 PM
7

porkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights25/08/14 12:21 AM
6

porkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights03/09/14 11:24 PM
5

porkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights24/12/14 02:50 PM
5

porkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights29/11/12 12:20 AM
4

WBBporkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights08/10/14 10:52 PM
3

Newsporkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights06/12/14 04:42 AM
3

porkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights19/06/11 07:39 PM
2

porkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights13/08/10 12:30 PM
2

porkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights12/07/10 06:17 PM
0

porkchop_d_clown/r/MensRights12/07/11 09:11 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I bin robbed!
/r/MensRights19/10/16 05:24 PM
2

Then, guess what? He won't pass the fitness tests and won't have to serve.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 01:45 AM
1

I'm pretty sure sperm banks don't collect eggs.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 06:48 PM
5

No, I think the headline is asking a valid question. The overwhelmingly dominant risk factor for getting AIDS is homosexual contact, followed by re-using needles for illegal drug use. Transmission through heterosexual contact is quite rare by comparison. The H.I.V. infection rate among black women is 20 times higher than for white women So, if black women are contracting AIDS more frequently than white women that is actually a very scientifically interesting puzzle.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 02:48 AM
1

Whether you admit it or not you have to fight for what you believe in.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 01:11 AM
3

"consent".
/r/MensRights14/11/15 11:23 AM
3

What an awful website - despite having never been there before, it insists I have used up all my "free views" and won't let me read the article. Oh, well.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 01:17 AM
1

I love science. I've been an engineer and scientist for more than 3 decades. This article is terrible.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 03:07 PM
3

This is a crappy article that really has nothing to do with Men's Rights - but the underlying subject is actually fascinating and may be a lot more common than we realize. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimera_(genetics)
/r/MensRights27/10/15 03:06 PM
-1

Going back to the subject that cops are less likely to die on the job than lots of other people....
/r/MensRights16/10/15 01:25 PM
1

Damn, dude. Seriously - let me do that to your arm. Tell me how long it takes before you have full use of it again, how long you were in physical therapy and then tell me you "weren't injured". The police are allowed to hurt us. That's not an abuse of power. What the fuck planet do you live on, anyway?
/r/MensRights16/10/15 01:06 PM
-1

Funny how they're the only profession that "mitigates that risk" by killing pople.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 01:05 PM
15

According to the Washington Post, the way he made her "uncomfortable" was by holding the door for her. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/from-chocolate-city-to-latte-city-being-black-in-the-new-dc/2015/10/15/c9839ce2-7360-11e5-9cbb-790369643cf9_story.html
/r/MensRights16/10/15 11:15 AM
1

Let me do that to your arm, tell me if it hurts.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 11:08 AM
-1

Even on a per-capita basis being a cop is far from the most dangerous job in the US.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 11:07 AM
15

Yeah, that's not how the law works. Please look up the phrase "probable cause".
/r/MensRights16/10/15 11:03 AM
1

Shrug. I thought it would be of interest to MR readers; if you don't think it's appropriate here, I don't mind killing it.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 07:06 PM
5

Unpossible. Everyone knows women are discriminated against in college, just like everywhere else.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 01:08 PM
1

So, I think the problem is that at least some of us are getting a demand to become a registered user before it will let us see anything besides the 1st sentence.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 09:30 PM
3

There doesn't seem to be an article, just a single sentence "A father who has been prevented from seeing his son by the child's mother should not be obligated to pay child support, a Brooklyn appeals court ruled."
/r/MensRights11/09/15 04:04 PM
2

You promised a link in the comments....?
/r/MensRights09/09/15 11:39 PM
7

Well, I admit cops never actually tried to shoot me, but it was certainly interesting watching them follow me where ever I went in the shopping mall, and being accused of shop lifting when I put a PC into my shopping cart. (This is a true story.)
/r/MensRights05/09/15 11:33 PM
20

I also learned the hard way that a bald white male is automatically a dangerous thug. It's the closest a white guy can be to being a black man.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 09:01 PM
8

Pfft. Women can't be held responsible for what evil men do!
/r/MensRights05/09/15 03:28 PM
21

The honest truth? It's like anything else you find on reddit. Some of us are here because they've noticed the lop-sided way the world is presented: as if men are automatically and always the villain in some trite melodrama. Some of us are here because that melodrama has put them, personally, through a lot of pain. Some of us are here because some woman done them wrong, and now they just plain hate women. Some of the people here are just trolls, or people from the "other side" hoping to prove tha…
/r/MensRights29/08/15 02:35 AM
5

If I thought intelligence was a gendered trait (which I don't) you just proved me wrong.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 11:57 PM
5

You've got to love the grammar in those comments.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 11:39 PM
7

Sadly, no. I actually ride over 3,000 miles a year on my bicycle, mostly in work commutes. (It's how I lost the 100 pounds.) If there wasn't a shower in my office they would have lynched me years ago.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 12:45 PM
12

Heh. When I weighed 300 pounds I assumed I sweated because I was fat. I lost 100 pounds in my 30s and I still sweat buckets for no reason. I have to keep spare clothes at work. Drives me crazy.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 10:33 AM
73

So, here's the basic irrefutable argument: I'm a 50 year old man, I'm 6', I weigh 230 pounds, and I'm hairy. If a woman in the office is too cold, she can add a layer of clothing. If I'm sitting, sweating, in the office does she really want to see me strip off my clothes?
/r/MensRights05/08/15 01:44 AM
2

And finally, the rules prohibit companies for refusing service. A bartender doesn't own the establishment, and doesn't speak for it. That's nonsense. The bartender is acting as a representative of the company. If a bartender serves you when you're drunk and you get into an accident, you sue the bar, not the bartender.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 03:13 PM
4

Shirt and shoes are required by law for sanitary reasons, it has nothing to do with "dress code".
/r/MensRights18/07/15 02:15 PM
2

That's not true. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/07/10/no-the-oregon-bakers-werent-fined-for-publishing-the-complainants-home-address-or-for-otherwise-publicizing-the-complaint-against-them/
/r/MensRights18/07/15 02:13 PM
5

You know, requiring written consent for sex is actually nothing new. It's just that they used to call it a "marriage license".
/r/MensRights10/07/15 03:50 PM
2

Most prosecutors I've worked with tend to be good people Personal experience is unreliable as evidence. Also prosecutors don't get paid very much and don't earn money from "winning." No, they just get re-elected for claiming a high conviction rate and being "tough on crime". From this morning's news: The Prosecutor who says Louisiana should kill more people
/r/MensRights08/07/15 10:43 AM
6

You're being downvoted for not recognizing the rampant abuse of prosecutorial power in the US. Start with this - it was written by a judge for the Georgetown Law Journal: http://georgetownlawjournal.org/files/2015/06/Kozinski_Preface.pdf This was written by a law professor: http://columbialawreview.org/ham-sandwich-nation_reynolds/ Round it out with "Three Felonies A Day": http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1594035229/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_il_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=15940352…
/r/MensRights07/07/15 11:51 PM
25

That's always the argument, and yet it always happens. When RICO was passed we were promised it would only be used against mobsters. 15 years later it was used against protesters. "structuring" laws were supposed to be used against people laundering drug money - now they're used against small business owners whose only crime was to make multiple bank deposits on the same day. If you pass a law it will be used for purposes you didn't expect.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 08:14 PM
6

Why post a screen shot? Why not link to the original document? http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/svjfry12.pdf
/r/MensRights19/06/15 09:28 PM
2

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/blue-collar of or relating to wage-earning workers who wear work clothes or other specialized clothing on the job, as mechanics, longshoremen, and miners.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 04:20 PM
107

Blue collar workers don't generally work in an office.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 02:23 PM
1

Glad to hear it. Back in 1990 or so I worked for a firm that expected me - a software engineer (aka code monkey) to wear a suit and tie not only to work, but also on the airplane to- and from- customer sites. (This same firm gigged a female coworker for not paying enough attention to her attire...) Then they sent me to a large silicon valley firm for a 6 month contract. I went out with a crew cut and a suit, came back with a rat tail, goatee and a t-shirt. The firm resisted for about a week, the…
/r/MensRights12/06/15 06:41 PM
1

I'm kind of disappointed I'm not on that list.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 04:18 PM
2

Lots of guys wear shorts where I work, at least occasionally. I come to work every day wearing my cycling clothes. Perhaps you need to push your office comfort zone a bit.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 11:52 AM
0

And they've apparently formed a voting brigade.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 10:59 AM
1

TIL "dangerous" means "Saying things /u/garaging doesn't like".
/r/MensRights23/05/15 10:57 AM
1

You need to read that again because that number is the number of abductions by family friends.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 10:55 AM
0

Except that was inevitable once they got involved, precisely because of people like /u/garaging. It's how you end up like this: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/14/white-grandfather-detained_n_1275383.html
/r/MensRights22/05/15 10:37 AM
-2

This is the world people like you have created: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/14/white-grandfather-detained_n_1275383.html
/r/MensRights22/05/15 10:35 AM
-1

Read this comment. This is the world people like you are creating: http://np.reddit.com/r/Libertarian/comments/36tujc/man_helps_boy_retrieve_ball_dont_worry_the_police/crh3cg8
/r/MensRights22/05/15 10:27 AM
-2

A lightning rod doesn't ruin a man's life when you use it unnecessarily.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 10:03 AM
0

Do you spend a lot of time worrying about lightning strikes, too? You need to worry about rational concerns, not the scary things the press shows you so they can make money.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 02:14 AM
-1

Okay, so people are paranoid and neurotic in Canada, too. Fascinating. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/child-abductions-by-strangers-rare-in-canada-1.1335061
/r/MensRights22/05/15 12:52 AM
-1

And you clearly don't have kids. AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. My kids are 25 and 18 years of age, buddy. They were born back when the crime rate was much higher than it is today. The 18 year old is getting ready to leave for college and she was just awarded a small scholarship by her high-school for an essay she wrote on her favorite book. I'm throwing the first of several parties for her this weekend. I raised them to be as free-range as I could, despite paranoid busy bodies like yourself. Edit: My b…
/r/MensRights22/05/15 12:33 AM
2

How many children are abducted by a stranger in the US each year?
/r/MensRights21/05/15 08:18 PM
6

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/five-myths-about-missing-children/2013/05/10/efee398c-b8b4-11e2-aa9e-a02b765ff0ea_story.html
/r/MensRights21/05/15 08:17 PM
-3

You are one paranoid, neurotic man. Do you have any idea how rare abductions by strangers are? http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/five-myths-about-missing-children/2013/05/10/efee398c-b8b4-11e2-aa9e-a02b765ff0ea_story.html That kid is more likely to be struck by lightning.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 08:14 PM
-1

Okay. The teacher was right. Where do the police fit in?
/r/MensRights21/05/15 07:28 PM
2

I have heard this sentiment (that hook up culture is bad for women) from women in the past, but I don't know how widely accepted the belief is.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 03:15 PM
1

I am >so< jealous.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 11:06 PM
1

racism?
/r/MensRights15/05/15 10:32 PM
-1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_recording_by_civilians In the United States, anti-photography laws have been passed in many places following the September 11 attacks and the increased popularity of camera phones. There might be local laws and policies governing the specific landmark or property on which one seeks to photograph. Laws on private property differ. Owners of private property in most places must authorize recording on their own property. Laws differ in the United States on ho…
/r/MensRights09/05/15 06:14 PM
2

Also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_recording_by_civilians The laws regarding the recording of other persons and property by means of still photography, videography, and audio recording vary by location. In many places, it is common for the recording of public property, persons within the public domain, and of private property visible or audible from the public domain to be legal. But laws have been passed in many places restricting such activity in order to protect the privacy of oth…
/r/MensRights09/05/15 06:12 PM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/35dyov/man_takes_selfie_with_darth_vader_woman_names_and/cr3o768
/r/MensRights09/05/15 06:10 PM
-2

Says the guy with zero understanding of how the law works. Federal law does not supercede state law. If it did we wouldn't need state legislatures. Read a book some time.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 05:24 PM
-5

That is not Pennsylvania law - and the 4th amendment >increases< your privacy, it doesn't diminish it. I really don't think you understand how a federal system works. Hint: Individual states can grant their citizens more protection than federal laws do. You claimed that the only law governing recordings is federal law. I've given you a clear and irrefutable fact: Pennsylvania has it's own laws governing recordings. What do you expect to prove by putting up random links to articles about the 4th …
/r/MensRights09/05/15 05:20 PM
-5

You do realize we're talking about photos taken on private property, right? Toy stores are as private as restaurants... And, in any case, no where in the law I posted does it say that public places can't have an expectation of privacy.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 05:07 PM
-4

"Oral communication." Any oral communication uttered by a person possessing an expectation that such communication is not subject to interception under circumstances justifying such expectation. The term does not include any electronic communication. The average person does not expect to have their conversations recorded, thus the "reasonable expectation of privacy" includes most public settings. Why do you think police need warrants to record conversations in public places like restaurants?
/r/MensRights09/05/15 04:48 PM
-4

Yes, it is. Criminal law - including "wiretap" laws - vary from state to state. Pennsylvania requires prior consent from all parties before you can record their conversations. Pennsylvania Wiretap Law - despite the name, it covers "recording oral conversations" which means videotaping, too. Edit: In addition, there's the reasonable expectation of privacy standard, which covers still photos.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 04:24 PM
7

Unfortunately, even that standard is under attack.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 04:23 PM
3

This has been widely reported in multiple Australian papers.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 03:55 PM
-3

That is not true. Recording laws vary from state to state. In Pennsylvania all parties must consent.before being audio or video recorded. Still photos are okay, though
/r/MensRights09/05/15 03:54 PM
-7

Headline is misleading, she thought he was taking pictures of her kids. She's still a crazy bitch, but she doesn't have anything against star wars.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 03:47 PM
1

No, you argued that I believe all men are obsessed with their penis, even after I said that I'm not. Edit If you're worried about people identifying you, two things: first, you just agreed that you are worried about what people think about your penis, confirming the stereotype and, second, you should delete your comments, too because anyone who has the direct link will still be able to read the entire post, including your message just now.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 12:50 PM
4

Patriarchal lies. Haven't you heard? 1 in 5, man! One. In. Five.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 05:51 PM
2

Citation?
/r/MensRights10/04/15 02:07 AM
1

any birth-control measures, preventative or otherwise, are under scrutiny by the doctor's own beliefs. You have examples of doctor's demanding a husband's approval before providing an abortion?
/r/MensRights10/04/15 02:07 AM
1

So, you do realize you confirmed that what I said was true, don't you? Even though you claim I am "trying to turn this into something more serious than it is"...? Honestly, I'm not even sure what that statement is supposed to mean.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 02:05 AM
3

and what if you had told him that she didn't know you were getting it done?
/r/MensRights09/04/15 09:43 PM
6

As I said above, this is not a legal requirement, it's something doctors do on their own. http://www.babble.com/babble-voices/husband-want-a-vasectomy-hell-have-to-get-your-permission/
/r/MensRights09/04/15 08:15 PM
11

It's not legally required but apparently many doctors require it before they will do the operation.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 07:26 PM
0

"Right wing" now means "anyone who does stuff we don't like."
/r/MensRights05/03/15 09:36 PM
1

When I try to view that page, I get a blank google translate page.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 09:35 PM
2

You should resubmit with a correct headline.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 09:18 PM
1

It's certainly not a good outcome, but /u/The_Nameless_Mist is right - he could turn that into an annuity and extract 100k per year for 30 years.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 04:48 PM
0

You need to fix that headline, because it makes no sense and doesn't seem to have anything to do with /r/MensRights.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 10:23 PM
0

You beat me in submitting this. I was so startled that Cracked had a serious article about something I think I froze.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 06:20 PM
3

They always say they used "appropriate force". They said they used appropriate force when they dropped a grenade in an infants crib.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 07:17 PM
0

I don't really see this as a mens' rights issue.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 04:15 PM
5

Yup. Doesn't mean it isn't offensive, but pardon me if I reserve my outrage for current events.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 02:07 AM
3

http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/12/the-ethics-of-sarcastic-science/383988/?utm_source=digg&utm_medium=email
/r/MensRights26/12/14 01:59 AM
2

http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/12/the-ethics-of-sarcastic-science/383988/?utm_source=digg&utm_medium=email
/r/MensRights26/12/14 01:59 AM
3

The "male idiot theory" was meant to be a piece of satire and not take seriously. Unfortunately, people do: http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/12/the-ethics-of-sarcastic-science/383988/?utm_source=digg&utm_medium=email
/r/MensRights26/12/14 01:58 AM
3

Well, that's why I tagged it as "reverse genders" - if the roles had been reversed, with an older man and a 17 year old girl, there would have been a lot more outrage.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 05:14 PM
2

Mostly I agree, but I still think that if the genders had been reversed this would be treated very differently.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 05:13 PM
2

Also sending porno (nude selfies) to a minor.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 05:12 PM
-1

Be fair - if she really had been assaulted by a group in some form, how would you expect her to feel?
/r/MensRights09/12/14 11:30 PM
2

It's not an "article", it's an editorial. It's taking a position, not delivering supposedly unbiased news.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 07:23 PM
1

No one can give you an equal outcome. Anyone who claims they can is lying.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 11:43 AM
3

On the subject of "hire women if you can pay them less" I ran into an interesting example today. If you've never heard it, NPR has an excellent podcast called "Planet Money". By coincidence, the episode I listened to on my way home from work had a historian who claimed that the reason teaching became a "pink collar profession" was exactly that - at the beginning of the 19th century teaching was almost exclusively male, till politicians realized they could hire women for half the money. Obviously…
/r/MensRights04/12/14 11:34 PM
7

That's the point - they're trying to show how stupid the idea is to treat different people differently. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirmative_action_bake_sale
/r/MensRights04/12/14 07:22 PM
3

If it cost less to hire women, businesses would prefer to hire women over men.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 06:25 PM
11

Are you sure it's feminists? This kind of thing is often done by libertarians trying to make a point about affirmative action.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 05:35 PM
1

I would have to agree - and in two ways. First, the "old boy's network" is still a thing - every job I've gotten in my career after the first one was due to contacts gained at a previous job. (Also, these days we just call it "networking".) Second, while I think it's foolish to claim everyone in a group believes the same way, it is still true that some women worry a great deal about being left out. There was something a few years ago about a woman suing her employer because her male co-workers w…
/r/MensRights01/12/14 07:36 PM
2

She should sack up and buy a gun.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 06:02 PM
9

The good news is - it sounds like they threw the book at her.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 02:56 PM
3

IIRC not only is she required, they've been trying to get at her but she appears to have fled.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 09:37 PM
2

She then forced him to have sex with her companion in the back seat. How do you define "rape"?
/r/MensRights01/10/14 11:46 AM
1

Where did I say it was a bad thing?
/r/MensRights17/09/14 12:52 AM
9

Which is why they include shaving equipment.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 02:35 PM
0

I had a nationally syndicated columnist tell me to my face that it is impossible for black people to be racist.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 02:47 AM
8

I tried to pull it up but it seems reddit has truncated user histories to just a few years. I didn't realize they were doing that till recently.... Found it: http://gritsforbreakfast.blogspot.com/2012/02/me-apd-and-babysitting-while-white-part.html
/r/MensRights06/08/14 01:06 AM
17

I submitted a story to MensRights a few years ago about a grandfather walking with his mixed race grand-daughter. Let's just say the words "massive police response" fit pretty damned well...
/r/MensRights05/08/14 11:01 PM
2

It's the basic flaw of human civilization: The people who are running things are inevitably the angriest and most fanatical because the happy people are satisfied with the way things are and don't feel the need to change the world.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 04:07 PM
11

The thing that feminists have to ask themselves is "Where do these warped ideas about feminism come from?" Until they recognize the hate in their own membership they will continue to be confronted by people who reject them.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 05:47 PM
-1

That's an awfully misleading headline...
/r/MensRights22/06/14 11:25 PM
2

TIL a "perfect storm" is 262 claims divided by 54 schools over 4 years - that's barely a claim per year per school....?
/r/MensRights20/06/14 11:13 AM
1

The other lesbian woman...?
/r/MensRights19/06/14 07:28 PM
1

And what about the other one?
/r/MensRights19/06/14 07:12 PM
1

At least she's being mocked like she deserves to be... http://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/28729f/we_need_feminism_to_stop_starerape/
/r/MensRights15/06/14 05:10 PM
8

And teen aged girls???
/r/MensRights07/06/14 04:09 PM
7

Ummm... This definition of rape is not new, and if the genders had been reversed, they would certainly have called it rape whether she wanted it or not...
/r/MensRights07/06/14 01:51 PM
1

Heh. Just so you know, it's not just feminists. A sense of aggrieved entitlement is what drives our culture, whether you call yourself a "conservative" or a "liberal" or a "feminist" or a "libertarian". Even being aware that this doesn't really help, it just makes you feel more aggrieved. ;-)
/r/MensRights30/05/14 12:28 AM
2

It's happened. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/25t1md/the_onion_judge_rules_white_girl_will_be_tried_as/chkxuv3
/r/MensRights18/05/14 12:03 PM
4

Yes, and?
/r/MensRights18/05/14 12:02 PM
2

I don't think you understood what I wrote. The purpose of these kinds of tests is to force people to choose among stupid, ridiculous answers in order to reveal their true personality instead of just giving the "right" answers to the questions. This question would have been part of a series of many other questions with similarly nonsensical answers. They're like Rorshach ink blots.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 02:34 AM
15

Believe it or not, forcing you to pick the "least ridiculous" option will tell them something about you.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 04:24 PM
2

It's a personality assessment, there is no "right" answer, they're trying to find out what kind of beliefs /u/Yojimara has.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 11:26 AM
28

It's a personality assessment, there is no "right" answer, they're trying to find out what kind of beliefs /u/Yojimara has.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 11:25 AM
1

That may be true, but your link does not and cannot prove that.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 01:27 PM
0

Did you actually read the post I was originally replying to?
/r/MensRights22/03/14 12:29 PM
-3

You're missing the point. I never said Sarkessian was a non-profit. Also, do you really think non-profits don't hire admins?
/r/MensRights22/03/14 12:25 AM
4

Hold on. there's a difference between being a federally certified 501(c)3 and being a non-profit. First off, there are many categories of non-profits under 501(c), ranging from political groups to charities to social clubs. Second, it is entirely possible for a small organization to be registered as a non-profit with their state, but not with the federal government. Why would they do this? Well, first, until 2005, the feds didn't require non-profits to register at all. Second, for a small group …
/r/MensRights21/03/14 11:16 PM
3

How do you even measure something like that?!?
/r/MensRights16/03/14 05:00 PM
1

Since we haven't seen the actual evidence we really shouldn't judge >but< if the press reports are accurate there's good reason to wonder about her motives here.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 02:00 AM
27

Point taken, but they made a deliberate choice to excerpt that text and post it on their page, which strongly implies an editorial endorsement of the position.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 05:02 PM
2

I'm reading the google translation. The word "75%" doesn't even occur in it. It says: Guys get three-quarters of the admonitions of Flemish teachers, although girls as much as they talk in class. A large-scale study on three Belgian universities has shown that boys are still discriminated against in school, but often this is not done consciously.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 02:31 AM
15

You aren't reading that properly. Guys get three-quarters of the admonitions of Flemish teachers All reprimands = 100%. The boys receive 75% of the reprimands. Therefore, the girls receive 25% of the reprimands. Therefore, the boys are reprimanded at 3x the rate of the girls.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 05:26 PM
14

To summarize: Boys get scolded for talking in class at 3x rate as girls, even though girls talk in class about as often. Further, the boys are given worse grades for the same levels of achievement which demotivates them and leads to lower graduation rates.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 02:54 PM
4

Tell people it's to help identify any potential genetic issues.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 08:38 PM
14

That's just statistics. No, it's under-reporting and bias.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 08:35 PM
52

This is exactly the way to talk to your boys if you want them to think they’re adopted, or to suspect you of suffering from an undiagnosed concussion, or to run away to join the nearest roving band of feral backwoods bow hunters at the earliest opportunity.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 06:07 PM
2

You know, when I read that "paternity is good for the family" I said "Right on!". But that was because I didn't think he was talking about taking a vacation.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 12:37 AM
1

Dude. Read the headline again. Read my comment. It was a joke, genius.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 11:52 AM
1

The guy's lucky he didn't get arrested. What kind of a jerk won't pay for a woman's drinks?
/r/MensRights30/07/13 02:09 AM
1

Well, that's the way the laws have always worked - fathers and courts could never be totally sure of paternity, so it has always been assigned based on marriage.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 04:47 PM
8

In cases of severe violence, more men were victimized than women, with 1.8 million women victims of severe violence and 2 million male victims of severe violence a year.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 06:45 PM
3

Sigh. I'll have to check this out tonight. My company's firewall is blocking the link for "proxy avoidance" - I don't even know what that means, but I can't read the article.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 02:47 PM
4

Wow!!!
/r/MensRights19/07/13 03:30 PM
5

How long will we let Moon Unit and Dweezel suffer?
/r/MensRights12/07/13 03:07 PM
9

Sorry, it's the Daily Mail - I can't take it seriously.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 08:22 PM
1

There's nothing wrong with older women being interested in younger men when they're both still consenting adults. Do you also believe there's nothing wrong with older men making blatant comments about the appearance of young women in a family gathering?
/r/MensRights05/07/13 01:48 AM
15

They've been paid by the community to parent Strange world you live in.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 08:40 PM
2

Sorry, but I agree with the boy's father. Life on a farm is hard and death is common, the boy needs to get used to it.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 11:45 AM
2

I'm pretty sure it's mentioned right there in the headline.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 12:42 PM
5

Crashes his house?
/r/MensRights01/04/13 03:51 PM
0

And that had nothing to do with their entire business being disrupted by anonymous attacks?
/r/MensRights22/03/13 02:52 PM
-4

I'm sorry but while I think Richards was a dick, her employer should not have caved in to what amounts to a terrorist attack: Firing her to make the DDOS attack stop was simply pathetic.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 11:39 AM
0

Then why is the article all about how this will hurt women?
/r/MensRights17/01/13 02:58 PM
1

Clearly, the course is biased they should have different fitness standards for women. </sarcasm> (I say this being well aware of how different the fitness standards for women in the USAF were back when I was in basic...)
/r/MensRights05/12/12 05:18 PM
7

So, can I assume that if I grope and kiss an 18 year old woman without her consent, you'll be okay with that, too? (I do realize that isn't your comment, just venting.)
/r/MensRights20/11/12 09:28 PM
5

Why would you want to kiss your grandmother? Or anyone else's?
/r/MensRights20/11/12 09:26 PM
1

Oh, I know - I'm just pointing out that this wasn't an isolated or unisex event - I don't see this as an MR issue.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 10:22 PM
10

Well, I agree that this was outrageous but it's hardly the first time: There was that time the fashion reporter basically honked Scarlet Johansson's breasts while interviewing her about her dress. That was pretty startling. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N30tFRRyK30
/r/MensRights19/11/12 09:07 PM
5

Indeed.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 10:44 PM
-1

The fact that you can't grasp why the joke was inappropriate kind of proves Irrel_M's point.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 06:53 PM
7

When I taught martial arts classes, I suddenly understood why the owner cut holes between all the rooms, installing giant portrait windows. It wasn't that he didn't trust us, he wanted it to be impossible for someone to accuse anyone of anything.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 06:51 PM
1

If this were the '50s, stay-at-home wives would be a huge injustice that enveloped our country Or, maybe, they lived in a society where one salary was all you needed to support a family, and there was still so much manual labor involved in maintaining a household that it made more economic sense to dedicate one spouse to the job rather than hire servants to do it.
/r/MensRights10/06/12 11:06 PM
2

You're a pimp, living off the sweat and blood of a poor, enslaved, woman. Honestly, it's ridiculous the way society treats house-husbands. How did Tim Allen put it? "Women have choices. Get a career? Get married? Get a career and get married? Men have no choices. If you're a man, you work. If you don't work, you're a bum."
/r/MensRights10/06/12 11:04 PM
2

I'm going to go out on a limb and guess you aren't a biologist, because my son most certainly doesn't look a damn thing like me - he looks like his maternal uncles. Now, if you're talking behavior....
/r/MensRights13/02/12 04:41 AM
2

You have an odd idea of what "toddlers" are.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 04:39 AM
1

there's an old saying....
/r/MensRights13/12/11 07:19 PM
1

For the same reason nearly everyone thinks they're an above average driver. People are unable to recognize their own incompetence.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 05:35 PM
1

Which makes it just that much harder to understand why people are voting it down.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 12:27 PM
2

Only when your opinion disagrees with the hivemind.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 12:44 AM
8

... speaking of trolls....
/r/MensRights06/07/11 12:43 AM
1

Yeah, I know how you feel - I get that a lot.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 12:42 AM
2

Given that he was able to make bail but she wasn't, what's your beef? Bail is set according to a person's ability to pay, not the severity of their crime.
/r/MensRights23/06/11 11:32 AM
4

Men's rights?
/r/MensRights27/04/11 07:54 PM
1

Okay, I won't argue most of the things you said, but this one: Prostate cancer is ignored, but breast cancer is a cause celebre. There's overwhelming evidence that the real problem with prostate cancer is that it's been wildly over-diagnosed and that the real men's rights issue is that men are being cut up and catheterized over - at worst - small, slow growing tumors that were never going to be a medical problem at all. overdiagnosis of prostate cancer
/r/MensRights01/03/11 02:32 PM
1

At least I can keep my story straight, kiddo - because now your back to claiming people knew in August he was going to embarrass them in December - but didn't bother actually trying to lock him up until after he did.
/r/MensRights09/12/10 11:39 AM
1

LoL. So, the Swedish government is prosecuting Assange because he embarrassed a country Sweden doesn't care much for?
/r/MensRights09/12/10 01:35 AM
1

Why werent the charges brought up before he threw the US and other large powerfull nations under the bus? They were. This has been ongoing since August. If you had been paying attention, you would have read the reports about back then, right here on reddit.
/r/MensRights07/12/10 08:52 PM
1

"Innocent until proven guilty" applies to Assange's accusers just as much as it does to Assange.
/r/MensRights07/12/10 08:50 PM
1

You have got to be kidding me.
/r/MensRights27/10/10 03:31 PM
16

He's clearly a trouble maker.
/r/MensRights17/09/10 01:10 PM
32

Two years ago a crime was committed on this very spot!!! ALL MEN ARE SUSPECTS!!!
/r/MensRights17/09/10 01:10 PM
3

... thanks for the strawman, but WTF does it have to do with anything I said?
/r/MensRights22/08/10 05:07 PM
2

Thanks.
/r/MensRights22/08/10 04:40 PM
1

Do you actually have a link to an article that provides those details? every article I've seen has been rehashing the same superficial stuff.
/r/MensRights22/08/10 04:24 PM
3

Yet, apparently, the "molestation investigation" continues. So, alternate conspiracy theory: he groped some girl and when she pitched a fit, he posted a note to wikileaks about anonymous warnings about dirty tricks - so that when the police report was filed, everyone would assume she was lying.
/r/MensRights22/08/10 03:52 PM
8

By assuming the charges are false, you're assuming the woman lied - in other words, you're assuming she's guilty of making false accusations. The only assumption a fair person can make right now is that someone is lying, but we don't know who.
/r/MensRights22/08/10 03:50 PM
9

Okay, wait. The arrest warrant was dropped, not the charges. Do you have any evidence that the accusation was false? I'm not saying the guy is a rapist, but I am saying that having the entire world assume that the charges are a "false flag" operation is as nasty and biased as assuming he is guilty.
/r/MensRights22/08/10 12:59 PM
4

Not so astounding - appeals courts have to rule on very narrow legal issues; by issuing this explanation, the court quite likely was trying to give Friedman the tools to file a different kind of appeal.
/r/MensRights18/08/10 06:11 PM
1

ROTFL. I think you need to look in the mirror if you're looking for someone who sees things in black and white.
/r/MensRights18/07/10 05:06 PM
1

LoL. Has it ever occurred to you that "unbiased opinion" is an oxymoron? A person without biases won't have an opinion, either.
/r/MensRights18/07/10 05:00 PM
-2

From what I understood he is unwilling to do what it takes to survive as an independent human being.
/r/MensRights18/07/10 04:29 PM
1

This guy is old and has no sympathy for people who refuse to do what we all must do.
/r/MensRights18/07/10 04:27 PM
1

OP should do what's right for them Without regard for what's right for the person OP is leaching off of. I see.
/r/MensRights18/07/10 04:26 PM
3

Your mother has a mental disability that science may not have classified yet They call it "adulthood". She's trying to force him to grow up, and he doesn't want to do it. I'm going through the same process right now with my 18 year old son.
/r/MensRights18/07/10 01:12 PM
1

When I moved out my mom got smarter, nicer and developed a sense of humor. It was amazing how much she changed when I grew up. ;-)
/r/MensRights18/07/10 01:11 PM
-2

Yeah, I think he meant to post it in /r/peterpansyndrome.
/r/MensRights18/07/10 01:09 PM
11

You're a junior in college? Then grow up and move out. I'm sorry - but those of us who live in the real world have little sympathy for people who want to pretend they're still children.
/r/MensRights18/07/10 01:07 PM
1

True enough. I put it into /r/Mensrights because, really, I couldn't find another reddit that was a closer fit.
/r/MensRights13/07/10 04:42 PM
3

And if people buy the cheaper razors, they'll make less of the expensive ones. .... or they'll stop making the cheap ones available, or they'll just make them really crappy, to "encourage" you to buy the expensive ones.
/r/MensRights13/07/10 02:16 AM
4

It's almost certainly not "coded" to ignore the men's rights movement, it's coded to believe that if you typed in a very rare search, then you probably made a typo. If we all searched for men's rights for a few days, I'm pretty sure Google would automatically correct itself.
/r/MensRights01/06/10 12:44 AM
6

"You would still be swinging the golf club?" "Yeah, (Elin) stopped. She was respectable. I'd get the baseball bat, I'd get everything out."
/r/MensRights27/03/10 02:55 AM
1

You have evidence that the missing genes don't make men more likely to suffer genetic disorders than women?
/r/MensRights26/03/10 05:11 PM
2

Which has nothing to do with the actual article.
/r/MensRights25/03/10 07:08 PM
3

Whine much?
/r/MensRights25/03/10 04:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter