| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Please Stop Saying That Teacher "Had Sex With" Her Student - It's not sex, or an affair, or a scandal. It's rape. I don't understand. In one sentence you admit that case-by-case wouldn't make a good law, but in the next you say that holding everyone to the same standard doesn't make sense. What do you think the law should be? | /r/MensRights | 04/06/16 08:09 AM |
| 3 | Please Stop Saying That Teacher "Had Sex With" Her Student - It's not sex, or an affair, or a scandal. It's rape. What I meant was, legally, what age do you think we should have as the age of consent? Or do you think it should be worked out on a case by case basis? | /r/MensRights | 04/06/16 07:52 AM |
| 5 | Please Stop Saying That Teacher "Had Sex With" Her Student - It's not sex, or an affair, or a scandal. It's rape. Where do you draw the line? Assuming "consent" (not that I would call it that) was given? | /r/MensRights | 04/06/16 07:03 AM |
| 12 | Please Stop Saying That Teacher "Had Sex With" Her Student - It's not sex, or an affair, or a scandal. It's rape. "arbitrary number" doesn't mean "Make it whatever we want". There's no one-size-fits-all age of consent, as everyone matures at different rates, but we have to draw the line somewhere. Simply saying that the age of consent is arbitrary is no more an argument for it's reduction than it is for it's increase. As for age differences, the difference in experience between a 16 year old and a 25 year old is quite extreme, and the 16 year old would be highly susceptible to manipulation and coercion. Mor… | /r/MensRights | 04/06/16 07:00 AM |
| 5 | PLEASE HELP ME! 15 YEAR OLD ACCUSED OF SEXUAL HARRESMENT SCHOOL AND NO ONE BELIEVES ME :(If you don't get much help here, try asking /r/legaladvice. | /r/MensRights | 12/04/16 09:46 AM |
| 1 | How can a wife be so heartless? After Simon was maimed by a Taliban bomb, his wife walked out, squandered much of his £1million compensation - then took him to court for MOREExceptions prove the rule Do you even know what that means? It's supposed to be like when you see a sign that says 'Closed On Sundays'. In this case, Sunday is the exception and it implies that they're open every other day. Anyway your argument is stupid. You have one data point and you somehow extrapolate it to 50% of the worlds population. Actual psychology research can study thousands of individuals and make far less bold claims than you have and can still be criticized for being unscientific… | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 09:22 AM |
| 6 | How can a wife be so heartless? After Simon was maimed by a Taliban bomb, his wife walked out, squandered much of his £1million compensation - then took him to court for MOREThat sounds an awful lot like the '10% of m&m's are poisoned' argument. You know, that one that is used as an excuse to demonize men? I don't really have anything else to add. You seem incapable of trust. Lord knows how you made it this far without having a meltdown. You make me sad, and I hope for your sake that you are just a troll. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 05:17 AM |
| 5 | How can a wife be so heartless? After Simon was maimed by a Taliban bomb, his wife walked out, squandered much of his £1million compensation - then took him to court for MOREFeel free to correct me if I'm wrong (because I wouldn't want to make unsubstantiated assumptions about another persons character or anything), but the gender flipping approach would imply that you do not actually agree with such blatant generalizations. Why, then, do you have a problem with other men having the same issue? Also, a lot of people here have women in their life that they are actually quite fond of (Mothers, sisters, friends, ect), and I imagine that those who had a problem with wha… | /r/MensRights | 03/12/15 03:40 AM |
| 15 | How can a wife be so heartless? After Simon was maimed by a Taliban bomb, his wife walked out, squandered much of his £1million compensation - then took him to court for MOREalways One question: do you think generalizations are okay in general, or only when applied to women? | /r/MensRights | 02/12/15 10:35 PM |
| 16 | Reminder, 50% of american college women qualify for having raped a man by feminist definitions, 7% admit using physical force. Feminists deliberately omit this information and therefore promote "rape culture" by their own definitions.Had women initiate sexual activity with me while completely passed out. Had women threaten to tell friends I was gay/assaulted her/impotent if I wouldn't have sex. I think that would be considered rape by any reasonable standards. edit: can someone please explain what I said wrong? | /r/MensRights | 23/11/15 08:20 PM |
| 3 | rape is badI'm confused. Do you not think this is satire? They literally tape a straw to an IPhone and call it IConsent. How could this possibly be serious? | /r/MensRights | 19/11/15 08:28 AM |
| 2 | New Zealand female child rapist named. Was a school deputy principal. She gets the bizarre privilege of a "name suppression hearing" while men are named as soon as they are accused - but she was denied.I don't quite understand what you want. We can either give them the power to dispense capital punishment or we can not give them that power. I agree with you on principle; child sex offenders deserve nothing more than death, but the fact of the matter is that there is no perfect litmus test for identifying these people. | /r/MensRights | 12/11/15 10:48 PM |
| 2 | New Zealand female child rapist named. Was a school deputy principal. She gets the bizarre privilege of a "name suppression hearing" while men are named as soon as they are accused - but she was denied.It would never be as simple as 'accusation -> life sentence', but there have certainly been cases of investigations and trials being held extremely poorly. One example is children being grilled by police for hours until they say whatever they want, such as in the McMartin Preschool Trial. With moral panic at an all time high, the last thing we need is to give more power to an imperfect justice system (not that there is as such thing as a perfect justice system). | /r/MensRights | 12/11/15 10:32 PM |
| 2 | New Zealand female child rapist named. Was a school deputy principal. She gets the bizarre privilege of a "name suppression hearing" while men are named as soon as they are accused - but she was denied.Considering how innocent men are viewed for even being in the same room as a child, let alone how they're treated after an accusation, do you really think capital punishment is the best idea? | /r/MensRights | 12/11/15 10:07 PM |
| 0 | Proof R/relationships is biased against men. Husband posts asking for advice because he is neglected by his wife and feels lonely and wonders if he should ask her consent to have sex with other women. Husband gets dogpiled and called douchbag sexist muck entitled to sex and so on.Yeah I don't get it either. The guy said that he wants to sleep around but wouldn't let his wife do the same? Unless someone can show me the reversed case where a woman asked a similar question and got the opposite response, I don't think /r/relationships is the one with the double standard here. | /r/MensRights | 09/09/15 03:10 AM |
| 1 | 'Love' is a feminine concept designed to protect women and force males into conformity. Thoughts?Dammit. I typed out a big reply then accidentally closed the tab. Anyway, this gist of it was that a) Different people want different things and you shouldn't generalize that. Men have ended relationships due to a lack of emotional connection, and women have ended relationships 'because the sex sucked'. b) Just because both people get something out of it doesn't make it bad. of course both parties should get something out of a relationship. Why else would they do it? No-one should stay in a rela… | /r/MensRights | 01/08/15 02:34 PM |
| 1 | 'Love' is a feminine concept designed to protect women and force males into conformity. Thoughts?You're absolutely right. Hell, we can go even further! The idea of 'friends' was created as a social tool in order to allow us to feel validation for our own existence. Overall, I think we'd do better without them. Even more generally, the idea of 'happiness' was made up in order to give people some illogical reason for keeping themselves alive. In this modern day and age, I think that it's time we move on from such baseless feelings. Now that we live in a time where survival is almost guarantee… | /r/MensRights | 01/08/15 12:59 PM |
| 1 | CBC story on four British soldiers charged in ALLEGED gang rape of woman in Nova Scotia. Names and faces posted for all to see. This crap needs to stop.Well the details of the trial are usually kept secret anyway, right? All I'm saying is that we should keep the names out of it too. we'd still hear reports on the outcome of the trial, just not who was accused if they are found not guilty, or who was accusing if they weren't found to have faked the accusation. | /r/MensRights | 21/04/15 09:14 PM |
| 3 | CBC story on four British soldiers charged in ALLEGED gang rape of woman in Nova Scotia. Names and faces posted for all to see. This crap needs to stop.Why do women who allege rape deserve anonymity? Do you mean just those who allege rape and are proven guilty of falsifying the report, or everyone who alleges rape? Because honestly I think everyone involved should have anonymity until someone is charged with a crime. | /r/MensRights | 20/04/15 04:47 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter