TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

postyogaera Archive

View 0 posts and 21 comments by postyogaera on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It wouldn't, and that is the point of the story. At the same time, you kinda need to know you have a child to do anything about it. That is a pure biological disadvantage of being a male if you have sex with people you don't know.
/r/MensRights25/02/21 07:38 AM
1

otos she liked to be 3 or older, so it is possible he didn't contest it until a year or two after the adoption. Imagine adopting a child, caring for that child for months or even years, only to be told the adoption was done incorrectly and you have to give up your child. I'd fight it too. If he was named he would be liable either way, regardless of what the mother wanted, unless she could survive without state assistance. That's a pretty rare scenario.
/r/MensRights25/02/21 07:32 AM
2

People are way too much into labels without understanding them at all. My undergrad viewpoints were Feminist/Marxist on critique of standpoints. Since everyone just clicks on to feminism, and it constantly gets renamed...it would be first wave or Virginia Wolf feminism. Since then I earned my J.D. and practiced mainly in father's rights, before leaving to be a State's attorney. If you really want a good conversation, you can private message me, because I don't think you can find one open to the …
/r/MensRights23/02/21 08:32 AM
3

Sorry, but that argument is dumb lame and just wrong: All 50 states have forms that can be filled out to not just make you a putative father, but an acknowledged father, which then is the same as an adjudicated father. (Side note - There are tons of different fathers you can be, for example: legally---putative, alleged, presumed, adjudicated, adoptive) The same legal concepts don't hold true to a woman, because ...guess what... she gave birth to the child.... so then it only is subject to contra…
/r/MensRights23/02/21 08:13 AM
1

with this shitty situation to get what I expect, but not giving back what is expected of me" This wouldn't work in an actual abusive relationship. I propose the opposite. If your spouse refuses you sex for X amount of time, you need to document it with an attorney.
/r/MensRights15/02/21 11:07 AM
1

This fails to consider issues of men/women who are married and are living in a bad relationship and refuse to have sex with their partner. Their refusal still makes it rape, it's just hard to prove.
/r/MensRights15/02/21 08:51 AM
5

Victim claims rape, but has to provide proof, bruising etc. it is hard to prove, but if reported immediately, it has a good chance.
/r/MensRights12/02/21 07:32 AM
-5

I think comparing the two doesn't make any sense, and is always problematic. Men's rights and feminism don't necessarily have to be to be opposed. Feminism is from it's origin the idea of looking at the world from a woman's standpoint, in contrary to from a man's which basically has been the output of all of western history. Conservative or liberal is just another term for where one views ideas at any certain time, but again means nothing absent concrete ideas. A feminist can absolutely be consi…
/r/MensRights15/01/21 07:08 AM
1

se that some of the people posting on this forum think there is no such thing as rape? I don't understand. The Me Too movement didn't spring a bunch of low level rape cases that were unfounded. That didn't change the rules of evidence or a burden of proof. On a criminal front, it only made more victims and witnesses come forward. One of the big factors was, it made other guys come forward and say, "Yeah I witnessed that crime, and it wasn't right." On a non criminal side, it may have cost some m…
/r/MensRights21/10/20 04:40 AM
1

Wait wait... not going to address the issue of justice 4000 years ago, trust me, you don't want to go there... but the movement did provide actual convictions based on modern law (with jury trial) of several high powered people who were serial rapists. I understand the accusations against it, but mob justice is not what this is. It is rich and powerful people finally being held accountable. Why do I get the sense that some of the people posting on this forum think there is no such thing as rape?
/r/MensRights19/10/20 05:09 AM
-9

I am sorry this happened to you, and that your girlfriend is upset, but why would you assume that the Me Too movement is bad? Couldn't it be true, that a lot of women are coming forward to call out sexual abuse, and sometimes people make a false accusations? I guess it's surprising to me that you would be falsely accused, and know what's it like to be attacked on a generalization, and then turn around and do the same yourself.
/r/MensRights17/10/20 05:33 AM
-1

To be fair, this is what is called a Rape Shield Law, and most countries have them. The reason why it is fair is because other common law evidence rules typically exclude facts against the alleged rapist. For example, if 5 other women/men said he tried to rape him/her, that could be excluded from the jury as well, depending on the facts and the timing. It is a law that evens the playing field, based on a logical conclusion. That being---- Just because I raped X, doesn't mean I raped Y. That is p…
/r/MensRights15/10/20 05:23 AM
6

I feel like the real issue is just communication. Honestly it is that simple.
/r/MensRights13/08/20 05:13 AM
1

Is it possible that it is a policy change over these years? I know my office has had a ton. I have to argue all the time over cases involving prisoners. It used to be, they had to pay full amounts, but now we try to argue they shouldn't pay at all. Judges have a hard time with it.
/r/MensRights13/08/20 04:55 AM
2

It doesn't breach attorney client privilege to talk to the press on behalf of your client. In fact, being an attorney for someone is almost always a public fact. There isn't a single situation I can think of where any attorney would say, "quote me, but don't name me or my client." No such situation exists. It actually creates an issue where your client may be found to have waived privilege, so no competent attorney would ever agree to such a thing. In fact that is the exact reason, every legitim…
/r/MensRights29/10/18 02:41 AM
2

I understand you might need pseudonyms for the parties involved, but you don't need them for an attorney representing any party, especially when supposedly quoting him/her. You don't need them for investigators for the school, and surely someone on campus went on record. "James' family found him an attorney, who listened to James story and then told him, "If everything goes south on us, don't kill yourself." The attorney promised to do everything he could to get justice for James." The source sh…
/r/MensRights25/10/18 03:40 AM
6

This is a fake article. I tried to do follow up, but even the attorney wasn't named. The links also don't lead to any real people. This situation could be true, but from a journalistic standard, it is clearly fake.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 03:37 AM
1

My fault. I was being overly sarcastic and my post was very swiftly and poorly written. I apologize. Yes, it's kind of about men's rights, but the reason for the ban is based in morality, not anything else. You have to remember that in 1998 a man was arrested in Texas for having sex with another man in the privacy of his own residence and that if the Supreme Court didn't get involved that would still be happening.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 05:00 AM
0

Just on it's face you don't see the real issue? That's really sad. It's Texas. This has nothing to do with feminism or men's rights. It just ain't Christian to be having sex with anything that ain't your wife. Grow up and learn the climate of the country. It's that simple.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 03:50 AM
-1

Well you have to properly reverse the roles: So imagine if 75% of the Senate consisted of women, and that 1 of those 75 senators was in the corner of that elevator, and she was a woman, surrounded by male interns. Now imagine that another group of males attempted to get on the elevator and said the exact same words. It might play out similar, because 75% of the senate is now composed of women, which would require a great culture change, or you could imagine the pushing and shoving and non-exchan…
/r/MensRights29/09/18 06:37 AM
1

Just looking at the article, I am assuming this was a manslaughter charge, and she got a sentence and probation. It may seem light, but it wasn't first or second degree murder.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 04:59 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter