~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | CMV: The overall online dating population is roughly as attractive as the general populationI remember reading an article about mixed attractiveness couples (i.e, people dating outside their "league") and the finding was that the vast majority of them meet through friends, work or some other medium where there was a longer amount of time for personality to shine through. I reckon the snap decisions associated with online dating are way more brutal on men, since a smaller proportion of men are immediately easy on the eye. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/05/16 05:50 PM |
| 1 | Q4all... would you be gay if you could, in order to bypass most of the issues you guys argue about all day?I'd be happy to be bi just for varietys sake but I'm fine dating women. Also if I was gay my dating pool would be reduced to only other gay men who are like 10% of the male population. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/05/16 04:08 PM |
| 1 | Is Alpha vs Beta is a collection of traits/strategies or An objective measure of quality?This is the only definition of alpha/beta I've heard thats close to making sense to me. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/05/16 10:08 AM |
| 2 | Vulnerability is the most attractive feature of a personYou're basically describing the prisoners dilemma here. Except in your specific metaphor to lose once is to die, I'd say the stakes aren't usually quite that high in dating. In the iterative prisoners dilemma it can indeed make strategic sense to start with a co-operative move. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/05/16 12:07 PM |
| 2 | Vulnerability is the most attractive feature of a personVulnerability is a humanising feature, and hence attractive. Its like that OKcupid blog about attractiveness, where they discovered that people who are seen as "attractive, but with a flaw" get more quality messages than people seen as "generically attractive" the flaw humanises them, and makes them more relatable and appraochable. On the other hand, you also need to be bringing something to the table to begin with. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/05/16 12:05 PM |
| 6 | To BP: How do you explain this situation without the AF/BB paradigm of the red pill? How can you explain this common mating strategy among women noted in the comment section?Maybe I'm wrong, I'm just speculating based on the available information here. But to me the fact that its specifically anal is interesting, because theres no direct procreational benefit to anal. (And honestly its not even that physically pleasurable prepared to the self-lubricating vagina.) A large part of the appeal of anal comes specifically from the taboo aspect of it. From the dirtiness. So we have a situation where a person will do taboo stuff with one partner who they saw as a "bad" part… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/05/16 02:55 PM |
| 3 | To BP: How do you explain this situation without the AF/BB paradigm of the red pill? How can you explain this common mating strategy among women noted in the comment section?It comes down to the fact that anal is something she has conflicting feelings about, so something she's not even sure she wants to admit she likes. With her prior boyfriend, that was ok, the relationship had an "expiration date" anyway. And he was already "fallen" in her mind, so she could explore that side of her sexuality. Her new boyfriend she sees as "clean" and pure as a person. And she actually sees a future with him - so she's more reluctant to explore the "dirty" shameful side of herself… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/05/16 02:14 PM |
| 5 | To BP: How do you explain this situation without the AF/BB paradigm of the red pill? How can you explain this common mating strategy among women noted in the comment section?Why was she more "comfortable" with her short term ex who had a "big dick" but the relationship had an "expiration date" by BP logic? She gave him anal because the relationship had an expiration date. She sees anal as something "dirty" or "naughty" and so she'll only do it with guys who she sees AS "dirty", "naughty" and disposable. Men have been known to do this too, in the form of the archetypal madonna-whore complex. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/05/16 01:54 PM |
| 1 | Have you ever seen or heard of a guy that was an ultra nice, pushover doormat, then when rejected suddenly turned into a violent, angry asshole?If he didn't express that rage toward the woman it doesn't count, read the post. He did. Hence why I said "I knew a guy who did this". | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/05/16 04:18 PM |
| 2 | Have you ever seen or heard of a guy that was an ultra nice, pushover doormat, then when rejected suddenly turned into a violent, angry asshole?Yes. I knew a guy in my social circle who frequently did this. It follows a very simple emotional logic: at first he's excessively nice and a massive doormat, because he believes thats the way to get women to like him. As soon as it becomes apparent its not going to work out though the fact that he was such a pushover suddenly comes back as an embarrassment to his identy "I can't BELIEVE I did all that embarrassing shit and didn't even get anything out of it", this manifests as rage. Its a kind … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/05/16 12:28 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter