TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

power-bottom Archive

View 0 posts and 24 comments by power-bottom on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

What other evolved traits do you stand against and why? The appendix, religious impulses, racism, our discarding of a prehensile tail, slavery, the use of physical agression in order to leverage resources, plenty of others if I actually want to bother to stop and think about it. How are gender roles harmful? They serve purposes. How are cars harmful? They serve purposes. How are asbestos harmful? They serve purposes. How are fires harmful? They serve purposes. How is genocide harmful? It serves …
/r/MensRights14/06/11 08:05 AM
1

What do you mean by invented? They aren't a Ford F-150. They serve a role and have evolved! Okay, evolved is much better word choice. How? If I can show how they could be helpful would you back this up? I understand how some of them do have benefits. But in the big picture many of the gender roles we have are incredibly harmful. Everything is a case by case basis. And I'm not going to dig up specific instances of how patriarchy negatively affects society when they're posted all over this topic, …
/r/MensRights14/06/11 06:30 AM
0

I bet your also the type who thinks any means of resistance other than non-violence are deplorable. In the fight for the greater good compromises will be made. It's silly and naive to think otherwise.
/r/MensRights14/06/11 05:56 AM
0

Feel free to eliminate patriarchy, but recognize that civilization goes with it. You can't make ridiculous statements like that while providing absolutely no support of any kind. Do you just expect me to take every batshit crazy comment you make at face value?
/r/MensRights14/06/11 05:52 AM
0

Please tell me of any culture in any time period before, say, 1900, where Women were allowed to own property, but men were not. Women received greater protection under the law than men Female leaders were as prevalent, or more prevalent, than men I'm sure I could invent some more categories to prove my point, but I just don't care that much. All of the problems you described are problems caused by patriarchy. As many of us have said, but you've failed to understand, PATRIARCHY IS HARMFUL TO MEN …
/r/MensRights13/06/11 08:41 PM
0

If the state exists, any good anarchist will use it as a tool to fight oppression. Ignoring the tools at one's disposal isn't "honorable", its fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights13/06/11 08:37 PM
1

There are things called gender roles. Which have been invented. This is kind of the whole point, that these invented roles are harmful. To call this some type of authoritarian ploy is simply retarded. No one called it an authoritarian ploy. Not everything that we do is directly commanded or decided by someone else. As the previous poster said, large parts of patriarchy are simply cultural norms that we've adopted over the ages that end up harming us in modern society. Our ills aren't really caus…
/r/MensRights13/06/11 08:33 PM
0

There are things called gender roles. Which have been invented. This is kind of the whole point, that these invented roles are harmful. To call this some type of authoritarian ploy is simply retarded. No one called it an authoritarian ploy. Not everything that we do is directly commanded or decided by someone else. As the previous poster said, large parts of patriarchy are simply cultural norms that we've adopted over the ages that end up harming us in modern society. Any woman can become a poli…
/r/MensRights13/06/11 08:26 PM
1

There are things called gender roles. Which have been invented. This is kind of the whole point, that these invented roles are harmful. To call this some type of authoritarian ploy is simply retarded. No one called it an authoritarian ploy. Not everything that we do is directly commanded or decided by someone else. As the previous poster said, large parts of patriarchy are simply cultural norms that we've adopted over the ages that end up harming us in modern society. Any woman can become a poli…
/r/MensRights13/06/11 08:25 PM
-1

Dumb what down? You typed out something that...just didn't make any sense. There's no train of thought or content for me to respond to. Explain to me how your statement (that we should rename "feminism" to "anarchism" if it's not sexist) actually made sense to you, seeing as they are separate things. It would be like if I said we should rename "Men's Rights" to "Capitalism" if it's not sexist. What fucking connection are you making?
/r/MensRights13/06/11 08:09 PM
1

acquitted is a legal word meaning found not guilty of your charges. It makes no sense the way you used it. I know, I just copied and replaced from your post and didn't catch that, though I'm surprised you couldn't figure that out. And if you want to back up your point that being falsely accused of rape is worse than being raped, I'd love to see any actual points that may back up said conclusion, but it really just seems to be an extension of the victimhood pathology you guys have created around …
/r/MensRights12/06/11 07:13 PM
3

If there were any qualifications for being a representative in Congress besides residency and age, you might have a point. Also, if the conditions you describe weren't also by-products of a patriarchal society, your point might be more valid. Otherwise, the demographics are simply a representation of society placing a higher status upon men than women.
/r/MensRights12/06/11 06:42 PM
1

would you prefer to have a sore but for a few days Wait is this how you tried to define the consequences of rape? That the girl will be sore for a few days? Dude, go fuck yourself. I don't even want to debate here anymore. EDIT: Actually, after reading this again, I'm not really sure what you're trying to say. Elaborate? Also, I can make up the same kind of "points" as you to fuel an argument. "You could ask any sane person acquitted of sex related charges specifically, and I doubt a single one …
/r/MensRights12/06/11 06:33 PM
1

They were backlashes, dumbass. EDIT: Also, I enjoy the small irony of you posting two civil rights fighters whose histories as fairly oppressive misogynists has been largely ignored in modern views of the men.
/r/MensRights12/06/11 06:10 PM
3

You honestly think women's place in society is equivalent to that of men? Here's an example that I always find makes a pretty good impact. Only 17 of 100 US senators are female, and only 75 of 541 Congressmen are female. How else can you explain this enormous disparity, other than the fact that the public still highly privileges men over women in shit that actually matters?
/r/MensRights12/06/11 06:09 PM
1

Accusations of sexual assault are more damaging than rape Wow that is one hell of a statement you made. I'm sure you can back that up with statistics, or are speaking from experience being both a woman who has been raped and a man who has been accused of sexual assault and had it ruin your life.
/r/MensRights12/06/11 06:04 PM
3

I've seen this point made so many times, but nothing else. Is this board just a bunch of dudes who are scared of getting some girl pregnant and having to pay child support? That seems to be about the extent of the issue here, quite the one trick pony if you ask me. And guess what? The issue you complain about is a by-product of patriarchy, which feminism seeks to subvert. I hope you understand that the entire "debate" so far has consisted of nothing besides the members of this board arguing that…
/r/MensRights12/06/11 06:00 PM
2

Rename "feminism" to "anarchism" if it's not sexist Did you realize this didn't make any fucking sense when you typed it out or do you not think when you make statements?
/r/MensRights12/06/11 05:57 PM
3

This seems to be the point they have the most trouble grasping. All the problems you're bitching about/ THEY'RE PROBLEMS OF PATRIARCHY.
/r/MensRights12/06/11 05:54 PM
1

Because when the movements were being invented people came up with different names. Or it's a conspiracy, you're probably right.
/r/MensRights12/06/11 05:52 PM
2

It's obvious you still don't
/r/MensRights12/06/11 09:44 AM
0

Please enlighten us then as to what actual Anarchism is. I'm sure that you and the guys here, who used a definition of feminism that you invented yourselves to try to prove a point, who do very little reading on Anarchist philosophy in any way, know more about it than people who spend a lot of time learning about it. I'm sure the only response you'll be able to muster is a snide rebuttal, an invention of a problem, and a complete side-stepping of the actual question.
/r/MensRights12/06/11 09:43 AM
-1

The definition of feminism is gender equality, you just pulled out of thin air every point you made to try to create the illusion of a problem.
/r/MensRights12/06/11 09:38 AM
22

Feminism seeks to gain power from the state Uh, no. That's not the definition of feminism. And the people over at /r/Anarchism are so feminist because patriarchal anti-feminist attitudes and culture are the most prominent and in a lot of places most severe forms of oppression that currently exist.
/r/MensRights12/06/11 09:35 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter