TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

power_of_friendship Archive

View 0 posts and 16 comments by power_of_friendship on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Probably a concession made to the Cuban government in order to help build our relationship with them.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 11:31 AM
3

This is some of the funniest and dumbest shit I've seen in a while on reddit. Figures a redpill subreddit would actually manage to convince their fucking readers that some SJW doxxed them and took over the subreddit, and that the admin is lying to cover their tracks. I'd be rolling on the floor if I had come up with this idea.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 11:25 AM
1

I'm used to people making alts/spies in Eve, but this is some real life crazy person bullshit.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 11:21 AM
4

If things were truly equal, then it wouldn't matter which parent took time off from their career early on in the child's life. But since there is an earnings discrepancy between genders, it's worth making sure that the decision being made is solely due to cultural reasons rather than systemic sexism. Laws that make it harder for a man to decide to be a stay at home dad could be an example of that, but so could things like companies being reluctant to hire a man because they see a gap in his empl…
/r/MensRights12/12/16 07:07 AM
1

Nope, I'm calling you out on bullshit.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 01:29 PM
2

I think the burden of proof falls on you, as you're making a statement that is entirely unsupported at this point. I'm not the one saying that women are untrustworthy, I'm just the guy peer-reviewing your conclusion and telling you that it's weakly supported and needs considerable research for anyone to actually accept that it's true. I never said that women are as loyal or more loyal than husbands, and I never said you were definitely wrong. I just said that you're not right, which is different…
/r/MensRights09/12/12 01:11 PM
6

Ok, well I'm also someone with experience with drawing conclusions/forming models for some kind of phenomena. I'll put it simply. The size of the survey needs to be big enough so that you can observe patterns that are unique to the conditions you want to compare. If I'm trying to figure out how circumcisions are related to ED, I need have a population of N number of people. They need to represent a generic group, so I randomly pick N people from around the world. So now I've got N people. Well, …
/r/MensRights09/12/12 01:08 PM
6

Those examples are completely insufficient for suggesting that women have little to no loyalty. All you did is draw conclusions that you wanted from a few largely anecdotal sources, and one statistic that has absolutely no meaningful connection or evidence for a connection to your conclusion.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 12:54 PM
4

We don't have a football team this year.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 01:05 AM
0

I know a good example of a case where a girl was very drunk, had sex with a guy who was only kind of drunk, but he had no idea she was wasted. She actually lost her virginity to him, and really regretted it the next day. There were some girls who were really mad at him for having sex with her, but it's hard to blame him because she basically torn his pants off.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 02:25 AM
0

For all practical purposes, not really. If a guy kept buying a girl drinks and got her shitfaced, she'd be just as likely to have sex with him.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 02:07 AM
1

I can agree that it's not even as bad as drugging someone's drink, but when you're still "benefiting" from someone being completely inebriated, it's still an issue. Drugging someone for any reason is shitty, but the bad part is when someone actually has sex with the drugged person.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 09:14 AM
1

I agree, but because this kind of situation usually happens when the only evidence is basically hearsay, it's pointless to make the legal distinction. Basically it comes down to; if you charge someone with rape then there better be more evidence than just you saying you were raped. All that distinguishing between the two scenarios will do is make rape cases harder to fairly judge, and it'll make women (or men) less likely to actually try to press charges. There's a difference between morally dis…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 05:33 AM
3

I just know too many girls who were date-raped in college/high school to not be on the side of the inebriated party. Worst experience I've had; I got roofied by accident in high school (picked up the wrong drink) and the next day apparently rape jokes were hilarious. Apparently it's fine to laugh at a guy who got really drunk and/or roofied. Obviously that's not the case with women, but it's one of those things where looking back, I can't believe people made those kinds of jokes. I could have ea…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 04:53 AM
-1

That's actually nicer than them. I'd just want to make sure she was going to be somewhere safe for the night (plus the drunk tank isn't all that bad).
/r/MensRights15/10/12 04:29 AM
3

I'm on her side here, sure she's really drunk but it doesn't mean it's ok for the guy's to have sex with her. It's not as bad as a guy who stalks women to rape in a back alley, but it's certainly around the same level as a guy who would roofie someone at a party. She's clearly not capable of making good decisions at that point. Now, this totally goes both ways. If it were a guy who was extremely drunk and a girl who was sober (that he normally wouldn't want to have sex with), then if for some re…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 04:28 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter