TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

pozzolane Archive

View 1 post and 91 comments by pozzolane on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I'd rather be sued in an actual court where I'm innocent until proven guilty than a "Human Rights Court" which is just another Kangaroo Court.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 04:47 PM
3

And how about women's only clothing stores? I think perfumes counters should go too. And makeup stores. /s Horseshit! There's nothing wrong with businesses catering to specific sex, or sex interests. Don't like it, don't fucking spend your money there ya snowflake!
/r/MensRights09/04/18 04:42 PM
1

The "Human Rights Court" should really be called "The Whingers Court of Hurt Fee Fee's". And sadly, the bar that's set for plaintiffs in the court of hurt fee fee's is incredibly low. I have no confidence that this guy would win even though the reason for the complaint in the first place is laughably absurd. The woman who complained is pure trash looking for a reason to take offence.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 04:37 PM
239

But women’s sexuality is beautiful and sacred. Men’s is nasty and should be shamed and condemned.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 04:48 PM
6

Start by cleaning your room.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 03:04 PM
12

And calls him white trash to top it off.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 03:36 PM
11

Countdown to his apology 10....9.....
/r/MensRights03/12/17 05:05 AM
14

Feldman has been blowing the whistle for years now, but suddenly society at large only cares when groups of women step forward and start pointing fingers.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 09:23 PM
2

Both her and that woman troll who said she could do what she wanted with her own child could use a visit from Dexter.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 12:18 AM
4

She deserves a ton of respect and admiration for doing what she's done and in the process, her openness and effort on self-reflection. Thank you Cassie Jaye!
/r/MensRights05/06/17 05:26 PM
7

I hope this is satire. Otherwise you should drop "without my consent". It's superfluous. I'm enraged that anyone would think it's ok to take a sharp object to a baby's genitals for aesthetic reasons.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 02:59 AM
13

They just throw as much shit as possible in the hopes that something sticks. It's a convenient way to dehumanize and trivialize their political opponents because they're stupid and love having what they believe is a moral high ground.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 04:27 PM
1

And it's working! She's/He's received many upvotes for it.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 08:13 PM
6

I know, it's a joke.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 07:42 PM
1

Never go full retard. Looks like the twitter account of another feminist dance theory major.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 09:10 PM
9

He's also full of shit. Statistics do show that more women fight for exclusive full custody than men do, but the vast majority of men do fight for shared or full custody in divorce cases. And those stats don't show or note why those small amount of men don't fight for any custody in a divorce settlement (paternity fraud comes to mind as a legitimate reason why).
/r/MensRights16/04/17 09:06 PM
5

Note that he didn't make any value statements on this. He noted only the disparity of risk of injury. IOW, he didn't claim, or make an argument, that it's OK if women hit men, only that women are generally at a greater risk of greater injury when men hit them.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 07:50 PM
2

She's not if you're smart and get a prenup.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 05:05 PM
8

No you're not. This is the society in which we live. You do not need any medical training whatsoever in many places in North America to perform a genital mutilation surgery on an infant boy.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 09:59 PM
4

Manthreading? I haven't even heard of that one.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 03:34 AM
12

My taxes pay for this piece of shit "news" from CBC. I'm completely appalled with the lack of integrity.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 12:00 AM
1

First off, its a little disappointed that you are asking for a counter argument. The objective of conversations and arguments shouldn't be to prove yourself right, but to increase understanding. So it seems you're not motivated to understand better, but to stroke your own ego regarding your views. That said, the study she listed is a good one. However the question posed in the study wasn't "what would you pay this student?" It was more along the lines of "what can this student expect to make?". …
/r/MensRights14/03/17 07:26 PM
3

That's fair criticism.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 08:57 PM
16

How do you know what they do? There are a lot of them that do just this. You just don't hear about them because the news doesn't report any of it fairly. How many news articles have you read about men's rights advocates that doesn't outright call, or imply, that they are rape apologizing, moms basement dwelling, women haters? There ARE men's groups that assist, educate, and provide counselling services to men and boys, but they operate with almost no budgets, and are often the targets of misinfo…
/r/MensRights08/03/17 08:45 PM
13

You're a special level of stupid. Why don't you pop another Ativan and hit the road. Or maybe you should be studying up for that gender studies test you have upcoming, hm?
/r/MensRights08/03/17 08:32 PM
15

That stuff, too, comes up on here often. One of the issues this post is drawing attention to is that the issues facing men are treated as trivial regardless of their real seriousness. Even more egregious, it's taken as an affront to women and the men who wish to discuss it in serious tones are accused of misogyny and whining. This post is meant to highlight the double standards for which we treat the sexes (women are to be treated with care and delicacy, and always taken seriously, and men are d…
/r/MensRights08/03/17 08:28 PM
2

Bought it.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 04:20 PM
2

Serious question: Why does it make you angry? It makes me angry too. You know why it makes me angry? Because all those points are true and serious injustices that men really face (ie legal and wide social support for male genital mutilation, unfair legal treatment in family courts where men are treated like wallets... etc...). This is hyperbole to draw attention to these injustices and show just how supported women are as compared to men in these specific instances. Are you really thinking the a…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 07:13 AM
3

The labia majora is homologous to the male scrotum. It really serves no function at all unlike the scrotum which contains the testes. Neither labia majora or minora serve to protect the urethra. They form the shape of the vulva. Jesus Christ, this is not difficult stuff to look up. It's on Wikipedia and includes diagrams for fucks sake. I know you're a troll, but I'm concerned people are reading your garbage and will be lead into foolishness and idiocy. Please get a life and grow up. I would sug…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 05:19 AM
12

How is this drivel being upvoted!?!? The labia is the closest equivalent of the male foreskin!? Which labia!? The minora or the majora!? You fucking idiot, concern trolling-loser. It has already been explained to you that the male prepuce (commonly called the foreskin) is most closely related to the female prepuce aka the "clitoral hood" (they even share the same fucking name: prepuce). In fact, both protect the glans (head of the penis for men, NOT THE URETHRA, and clitoris for women). The clit…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 04:55 AM
3

"Are you another one of those people who doesn't understand that penises and vaginas are different things?" Says the fellow who also said "women do not have a foreskin". Have you made it through highschool? If you have, I am both perplexed and saddened at the current state of education wherever you hail from. You have been upgraded to purposefully obtuse AND idiot. Congratulations.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 04:16 AM
1

You're being purposefully obtuse. Or you're an idiot.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 03:34 AM
1

The image is not seriously arguing for the elimination or reduction in women's rights and freedoms to make them equal to men. It's using hyperbolic language to show in what ways we in-dignify men and strip them of bodily autonomy, and treat them with double standards in an era where we wouldn't even dream of treating women the same. It's to make you think, for example, why is it socially acceptable to remove healthy functioning tissue from a baby boys genitalia, but it's against the law to do so…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 03:30 AM
0

There are mountains of research showing a wage gap exists, No there aren't. An earnings gap exists, but that says nothing about "wage gaps". Even the feminist organization, NOW, reports that when controlling for other factors the "gap" is approximately 3%. Which is nearly statistically insignificant and does not necessitate that the best explanation for the remaining gap is sexism. So it's either ignorant or dishonest to suggest that there is a gap in pay when comparing equally qualified and ten…
/r/MensRights04/02/17 01:32 AM
80

So they were both drunk? In North America that means he sexually assaulted her as she cannot consent. Warm wishes in these dark times.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 04:54 PM
1

Sits to watch 4 Men 1 popcorn play out
/r/MensRights29/04/16 05:53 PM
3

So in other words, the law does consider disparity of force and reasonable force? So OP would likely go to jail for breaking the face of a woman who scratches and bruises him? Thanks for admitting that.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 04:18 PM
7

With such immaculate reasoning skills as yours I have deduced that it's ok to drop kick my neighbours toddler when he slaps my leg.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 04:12 PM
4

Wasn't politics already brought to the classroom by the mention of the gender pay gap in the exam?
/r/MensRights17/04/16 02:13 PM
8

Spellcheck is a tool of the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 03:58 PM
7

Then you're also completely ignorant of human sexual anatomy. The prepuce is a mucus membrane (like your lips or eyelids, but I assume you wouldn't pretend cutting a newborns lips or eyelids off would be appropriate in any context) with thousands of nerves. It plays an important role in protecting the penis from fecal matter during infancy, as well as a sexual role in adulthood. Furthermore, its removal results in hardening, thickening, and desensitizing (causing imperfection) of the glans as we…
/r/MensRights25/11/15 10:11 PM
8

Do you own, or have access to an English dictionary? I suggest you refresh yourself on the definition of "mutilate/mutilation". Even if you personally think circumcision is no big deal, it certainly fits the definition of mutilation, and therefore referring to it as such is completely appropriate.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 09:22 PM
8

Right. And to take your reasoning to the extreme, a woman can also give birth without a clitoris or labia. And certainly even less damage is done if we just take a pointy stick, or sharp stone, and just give the clitoris/clitoral hood a little prick or slice. Nothing wrong with that, huh?
/r/MensRights25/11/15 09:20 PM
7

You're not wrong. There are 4 types of fgm classified on a basis of severity. Types 3 and 4 are roughly equal in harm to male circumcision.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 06:41 PM
10

I'm confused. I was under the impression that there are only two genders and transgender is, by definition, in between genders. It's someone who's transitioning from one to the other and not some new gender, and hence, transgender. I also thought this was widely understood and accepted....Am I a bigot now?
/r/MensRights19/11/15 02:20 PM
8

Do you think that before they formed squads of girls to act as language police, sexist language was largely given a green light? Are you saying if not for draconian language policing policies, we can't otherwise discourage verbal abuse? Also, don't you think we should also help kids self confidence instead of trying to just ban words or phrases?
/r/MensRights19/10/15 03:29 PM
1

He is (or was) fucking the babysitter and we know that she looks and behaves much younger than she is, too.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 01:37 PM
1

You're giving them way too much credit. They're public figures and therefore should expect criticism. Especially criticism like "you suck" or "you're a liar". And the answer to your question is: would it please me? No. Would it annoy me? Yes. Would I seek out the law to criminalize it? It depends on the severity. If it was just: I don't like your ideas, you're an idiot, kill yourself. Then no, that's not criminal, nor should it ever be. grow up and get some thicker skin dude.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 12:02 AM
1

No it's not. She explicitly said that harassment also includes Trivial "day to day grind things" like "you're a liar, and you suck". She specifically mentioned those examples to include them in what she thinks is online harassment/violence. How is that to be taken in any other context? No, the truth is she really is being that silly.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 07:03 PM
1

I could possibly see it that way if the boy wasn't only 11 years old.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 07:00 PM
6

I hate to throw this word around, but that father is almost certainly a pedophile. I'm willing to bet a large sum of money that he's also been molesting his son. There's no other explanation for why a father would defend his sons predator and refer to his son as "sex mad".
/r/MensRights07/10/15 06:13 PM
1

Sarkeesian used that exact phrase as an example of "everyday sexist name calling".
/r/MensRights02/10/15 11:31 PM
2

I think Taco's referring to Anita Sarkeesian and Zoe Quinn who recently attended a UN meeting to argue that people who say "you suck!" to them online is equivalent to physical violence and that they feel the internet should be censored lest online harassment of women continue.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 04:50 PM
3

But less risk uti's something something = worth it./s Seriously this is a disgusting tragedy.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 01:06 PM
1

This woman is abusive and controlling. Glad to hear you kicked her to the curb.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 01:30 PM
1

You mean to ask if I wish to police other peoples fantasies with no good evidence of said fantasy causing any negative social consequences? No, I'm not a fascist. And BTW, I don't really like fighting games either, FWIW.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 08:14 PM
4

I don't necessarily like fighting games like Street Fighter... But my expectations are indeed shacked (sic) And there you have it, folks. Basically, you don't like something (fantasy) that others do, so you hope to tear it down. Nothing else to see here, move along. Speaking of boring, you're just another glib censorer looking for power over others hobbies. A modern bully.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 06:16 PM
12

All video game characters are akin to fetishism as they are fantasy! And there's nothing inherently wrong with that (unless you're a sex negative censorer who masquerades as a sex-positive third wave feminist).
/r/MensRights01/09/15 06:09 PM
5

I thought I explained that I understood your argument. It's a weak one that presumes good fighter = big muscles. When, in fact, this is not true in the video game industry or the real world. It also presumes that the majority of SF players are 14 year old males, and the female characters are designed solely to appeal to them sexually. This is also factually incorrect. The designers didn't design any of the characters to be "ideal fighter(s)". They're all hyper exaggerated characters in a fantasy…
/r/MensRights01/09/15 05:44 PM
3

"I can tell you as a woman that every time I choose a female character and she turns out to be a weakling sex object it's deflating, a little pinprick to my self esteem." I say this not as jab or insult, but with full sincerity: I think the problem is you and not the game. If you can't play a video game without taking character design in a fantasy world personally, then you need to seek therapy for confidence issues. I don't blame my own short-comings on fantasy depictions of hyper exaggerated v…
/r/MensRights01/09/15 05:13 PM
15

"...but there is something wrong about the depiction of R Mika." Why?? In the most basic sense, both characters are exaggerated in the extreme (one hyper "masculine" and one hyper "feminine"). Why is it OK to hyper exaggerate one in a fantasy world but not the other? And why is it assumed that by sexualizing a woman you diminish all her other traits? Are you telling me women cannot be both sexy and socially powerful? I have never assumed that, so why do SJW's? "In that regard the game isn't remo…
/r/MensRights01/09/15 04:52 PM
1

I'd suggest you put some much stronger thought into what you just wrote to me with respect to the statistics and the story the author is trying to convey. You just ate a whole lot of foot sandwich. Of course I know what proportionally means. When you calculate the correct proportions of men and women being murdered at work (on a per hour basis (that means correcting for hours worked)), you'll calculate that men are 1.4 times more likely to be murdered. That is, men are disproportionately being m…
/r/MensRights29/08/15 03:00 PM
5

Will do
/r/MensRights28/08/15 05:14 PM
20

Dan Keating at the Washington Post. A link to the article is in one of the picture descriptions. EDIT: His email is linked in the article so that readers may provide feedback. Please don't harass this guy, but I would encourage others to send him feedback with corrections on his statistical analysis. EDIT 2: I have drafted an email that all here may use to send in if they wish: Dear Mr. Keating, I’m writing you to urge you to redress some false implications made in an article you recently author…
/r/MensRights28/08/15 04:37 PM
1

Yes. Exactly this. She doesn't need to go to jail for justice to be dolled out. Spread her name and face around to all, along with the horrible story of her inhumanity.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 05:38 PM
9

But our contract with sky dad clearly states that we have to chop the tip off of our penises. Then we drink the koolaid and wait for the space ships.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 02:43 PM
1

I really am guffawed that she couldn't be arrested for hate speech for this. Imagine if she was talking about black on white violence like this and said "who among us hasn't had a daydream of going on a rampage and wiping out a third of the black population, AMIRITE?". Somehow it's totally acceptable to say the same disgusting thing but about an entire sex instead of a race?
/r/MensRights19/08/15 09:21 PM
2

That level of stupid was physically painful. I actually never made it far enough to hear him say "chattle". I turned off the video when he started on about how women are getting just tiny victories here and there. I'm not going back for round two. It's too exhausting listening to the mentally feeble (like him) self loathing masochistic white knights.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 07:22 PM
3

That was infuriating to watch. What a ignorant loud-mouth twit that kid is.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 01:32 PM
19

You can be a victim. If your perp was a man, and you were younger than 14. But pretty much only then.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 07:34 PM
14

I was awake the other night for a couple hours while trying to sleep because I was also worried about my 2 year old boy. But not due to anything like what this article discusses. I am worried that my boys' "worth" in today's over-the-top P.C. society is consistently trending downwards. I'm worried about the lack of help or empathy that will be available for him from society should he ever struggle with mental or emotional problems. Or that he would ever then think about suicide as an escape from…
/r/MensRights29/07/15 07:48 PM
7

While I do think there is a major gender bias when it comes to these types of incidents, I fail to see how a 22 years sentence is appropriate for the crime committed. I find such a long sentence kind of disturbing.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 06:54 PM
16

I may have an unpopular opinion here: Is it OK to not want to date someone because you don't feel physically attracted to them? Of course it is. But please use tact and consider that it's not OK to send someone messages detailing their flaws that inhibit physical attraction (as this guy allegedly sent to this woman). She is bang on in her assessment that such a message only has a purpose to hurt and nothing else. I find such a letter equally grotesque as I would a letter from a woman to a man te…
/r/MensRights08/07/15 10:39 PM
3

"skank skank skankitty skank skank skank"
/r/MensRights08/07/15 02:34 PM
1

My brother in law hates cheese but loves pizza and lasagna. I think it's fucked up, too, but he does exist.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 01:56 PM
3

If you are circumcised then yes, you are. If it was a common cultural practice to cut the ears off of babies, and you are an adult with missing ears, you might not consider yourself "disfigured", as it is culturally "acceptable" what you were subjected to. You may not feel strong emotions about it at all as you might even be "normal" with missing ears, but yet you would still be disfigured.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 01:07 AM
10

Based on the definition you provided, circumcision is most definitely "mutilation" regardless of how difficult it is for you to come to terms with that fact. Watch one and you'll see how violent it is. It also permanently disfigures (scaring and hardening of the glans and frenulum) a natural intact penis. The inner forskin is a mucous membrane that's also permanently damaged. This may be hard to admit to yourself because you don't feel damaged or violated, but that doesn't mean you weren't and i…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 08:05 PM
10

Jesus Christ. She's right; she's not typical. Because typical apparently means being a politically-correct sicophantic kiss-ass bullying asshole. As long as she is banned from these Canadian Comic-Con events, I will not go to them either (I live in Saskatoon). Also, fuck those kids from her shop class.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 09:43 PM
9

Because the message is "stop sexual harassment and violence when you see it" and all the examples portrayed only men as the perps and only women as the victims.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 07:47 PM
2

You're both wrong. Crazy isn't derogatory against those that have mental issues, it's used as a pejorative against those who let emotions overrule their reasoning faculties. And this is a valid criticism regardless of sex. If a woman or man cannot control their emotions when engaged in otherwise civil discussion, I would dismiss them as behaving rationally defunct, or, "crazy". Or put another way, "reals>feels".
/r/MensRights07/01/15 08:53 PM
7

Eh, it's called Natural Selection. They're just working hard for their Darwin award.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 09:14 PM
2

Also I would think it would be important to include female physics and engineering students too. Get shirts that have topless muscular men on them and then allow all students to pick which ever shirt they want between the two to sit in class with them on. That also sends the message that we don't care about what they wear or what sjw losers think it represents, we care about good people who choose to be in stem doing awesome work.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 04:42 PM
3

No, it's because it's an unpopular opinion.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 02:54 AM
3

Bingo.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 12:31 AM
2

You mean like this. C'mon, and chill out a little. Don't take t-shirts for toddlers too seriously. There are much bigger issues then that.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 08:00 PM
4

I agree. Finances should be a shared responsibility and neither party should just "buy whatever the hell (they) feel like owning". My brother-in-law does that, and as a result, their family is unable to go on vacation unless my sister saves her money for it and takes the whole family. He gets what he wants, and she makes all the financial sacrifices so the family can do stuff together. Doing that is just as shitty as a woman expecting most of the disposable household income to benefit her.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 07:49 PM
5

What's with the shaming? There is nothing wrong with being open about enjoying sex or photographing or videoing yourself in a sexual manner for your significant other. Sex and nudity is not dirty or shameful. However, robbing someone of their dignity is shameful. And that's what they did to those celebrity's by leaking those photos.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 09:59 PM
1

My wife has a friend (who is a major crimes detective in a Canadian City) who did the exact same thing. It's probably one of the most noble things a police officer can do. Any person that can unconditionally love another child that is not their own biological child is a great hearted person. This man is a good man.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 03:47 PM
9

Alleged assault. Ftfy.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 07:01 PM
2

But not to the same degree. We can't expect to be taken seriously if we criticize feminists for being so casual about men's rights, or downright anti-male, if we are also casual about the rights of women in places where it's needed most, or anti-female. Let's not be hypocrites.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 12:31 AM
1

The same brilliant mind that also writes for other blog sites like drunkenarmchairphilosophy.com or narcissistthatneedsattention.org.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 04:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter