TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

practeerts Archive

View 1 posts and 161 comments by practeerts on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

You spent money on her too?
/r/MensRights16/09/20 10:56 PM
-6

Take a gander at rule 5. You're out of line. The mod in question notwithstanding.
/r/MensRights02/03/20 09:12 PM
3

More of a survivor than outright victim, because HR didn't escalate my complaint about it to an actual investigation before I quit and found another job, but it was stressful as hell.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 06:17 PM
2

I've always seen it as a socioeconomic debate. I'm not sure what the article is trying to focus in on, it seemed like fluff underneath "this isn't about gender."
/r/MensRights19/05/19 05:48 PM
3

I don't see anything wrong with sexual thoughts. They occur naturally enough.
/r/MensRights28/03/19 09:57 PM
2

So you're in favor of policing someone for the thoughts others might have about them? That's absurd.
/r/MensRights28/03/19 08:46 PM
2

Puritanical history, mingled with nostalgia for chattel status of women. Nothing, it's absurdist outrage.
/r/MensRights28/03/19 08:45 PM
7

Solution: everyone stop watching it so reality TV can finally die. I'm an optimist, I know.
/r/MensRights29/06/18 03:03 AM
4

That's terrible. Then again, everything and everyone involved there is terrible.
/r/MensRights29/06/18 02:45 AM
-5

I mean, it's framed in a kind of silly way, but the objective goal of getting more cyclists is fine.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 12:35 PM
24

They could have at least matched the font. Lazy.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 03:56 PM
48

If the papers are structurally sound and within the scope of the assignment she can contest the grades, though my experience with that was limited to a world religions course; that specifically involved the professor making blatant statements about my character that were extremely offensive.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 06:14 PM
2

Yup.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 06:30 PM
11

It is still normal though. There are no hospitals that don't offer it as a procedure after child-birth. The data in those graphics is pretty recent, and probably won't include very much of the millennial generation, and probably doesn't include generation x or older at all. I looked around their website a little bit but didn't find the sources for their data. It's not organized in a way that makes that very easy. Edit: I'm opposed to circumcision, don't bombard my inbox with wild insinuations to…
/r/MensRights31/10/17 09:29 AM
4

The speed of the woosh must be inaudible for you.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 05:09 PM
3

Sure, you've got my logic pinned despite my never advancing a position on the point. It makes perfect sense that you can do that. My daughter does it when she's mad too. Sophistry is cute in children, you're not cute.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 04:43 PM
3

I read it, his summation is accurate.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 04:23 PM
12

Sounds like a real treat there.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 10:40 AM
16

There's a difference?
/r/MensRights11/07/17 01:04 AM
2

Don't ask don't tell is no longer a thing. In fact, it's no longer a thing because it obfuscated abuses and made it impossible to report anything by removing the chain of authority from victims. If that's really going to be the core of your argument, you need a new argument.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 05:52 PM
1

You get it.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 05:44 PM
1

I didn't need to see his name, I basically grew up watching his movies. The absurd outrage on this article title is childish.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 05:43 PM
1

So is she? They're married and both have causes beyond work they support. Most of them overlap.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 05:40 PM
24

This is reaching. Besides, I'd rather give recognition to a human rights lawyer than an actor. One of them does important work that few people will ever see, and the other one pretends to be other people.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 05:17 AM
4

Too many people Don't lump me with the dregs because I'm a young man, I've heard just as much nonsense coming from older employees.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 08:27 PM
1

Sounds like she heard about John and Lorena Bobbitt.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 08:19 PM
4

The signature mark is just really really tiny.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 03:59 AM
2

They continue to swear in on the Bible, you tell me.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 06:33 AM
5

Found the problem. a faith-based character building organization
/r/MensRights18/02/17 07:34 PM
1

Don't forget to mention peer-review and meritocracy.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 06:24 AM
-5

Your visceral reaction is kind of the point here.
/r/MensRights11/02/17 08:26 PM
1

Congratulations on learning the flavor profile of dog shit. Personally I don't pick up shit to taste.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 12:28 AM
1

You keep attempting to paint me as part of "the left" and I keep telling you "nope, you're wrong so fuck off". Fucking petulant child.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 11:10 PM
1

Here are all the fucks I give about either side of this. ...gone
/r/MensRights02/02/17 11:06 PM
1

I don't get my news from mainstream media, I don't care about celebrity something or other beyonce bullshit. The assumption that I have to get information through those sources is fucking dumb, go beat your dick off somewhere else. Let me enlighten you a little bit, people who are angry are violent.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 08:35 PM
1

I'm not endorsing or excusing this behavior, I'm simply commenting the facts of the matter. Your running narrative is that "the left" is violent, and it's childish and stupid.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 08:29 PM
1

Moron.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 07:02 PM
1

Find the word or insinuation that I've justified these events. Find the assertion that these things are just a 'normal' part of civil society. I won't wait though, those ideas are not there. You're just being a massive cunt and trying to crucify me for neutral commentary that references the historical prevalence of violent crowd action. Hey guess what, fuck off.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 06:12 PM
1

I don't know what you're trying to say.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 05:35 PM
1

I'm not placing blame. I see a person who calls himself a provocateur, and a crowd that responded with violent aggression. These things are factual details. I am unsurprised by them. If a gay pride parade route goes through a Muslim community I wouldn't be surprised by violence there either. I find peaceful Muslims quaintly teetering at the brink of apostasy. But hey, fuck me for seeing events and calling a turd a turd. It's the most unreasonable thing anyone has ever done.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 05:33 PM
0

Why does this sub have to pretend that I don't like him? Just because he's gotten a violent mob in response to his incitement and I'm here saying duh, of course, doesn't mean I'm pinning all the fault at his feet.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 04:53 PM
0

It's nice that you want civil conversation and debate. In reality you aren't going to get it. There is more incentive for mob violence than civil conversation.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 04:47 PM
2

Can you give a brief rundown of your position and how it is different from an anti-capitalist anarchist? Just hit the major points if you would be so kind.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 10:14 AM
7

Anarchists don't care about the left, or the right, or a middle ground. That's why their slogan has been "become ungovernable". Why the hell is no one in here noticing the photos of the anarchist flags, the A graffiti, or the Black Bloc?
/r/MensRights02/02/17 09:01 AM
0

The people acting out violently, throwing rocks, firing off fireworks, smashing windows etc are anarchists. They are inherently not leftists. You can tell by the little red flags, the spray painted A tags they leave, and the fact that they form into what is known as a Black Bloc. If those bits weren't enough the banners that read "become ungovernable" should really be the nail in that coffin. I'm not ignorant of crowd action throughout the history of this country. It was quite often violent. I'm…
/r/MensRights02/02/17 08:57 AM
2

As entertaining as I find his antics, he is unabashedly a crowd baiter. Why is anyone surprised that his provocations have finally incited mob violence? This kind of behavior has been a feature of this country since we were colonies.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 08:07 AM
9

To be fair that image is of a landing craft at Normandy, they weren't loaded with nurses. Field doctors, but 0 women.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 05:58 PM
1

That might have been an amusing article if there was any semblance of professionalism in its writing.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 07:26 PM
1

Less men enrolled in college is less diversity. Less women pursuing STEM even though they make up the majority of college enrollment is not lack of diversity. You're reading into things in the dumbest possible ways.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 05:20 PM
1

Less men are enrolled in some form of college/higher education. Less women pursue STEM fields even though they hold the majority of college enrollment. If you want to dispute cold hard numbers then go be an SJW and ignore the rest of reality too.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 05:09 PM
1

There are less men enrolled in college. Fact or something I'm making up too?
/r/MensRights13/01/17 04:54 PM
1

Did I say there was a lack of diversity, or that fewer women work in tech and general STEM fields? What the fuck is confusing about fewer women pursuing STEM? Look at enrollment and graduation statistics for STEM. Fewer women there, that is the fact if you he matter. Or are you assuming I'm some kind of retard pretending that it's "cause sexism and patriarchy keeps women out"? If that were the context for my comment then I'm in the wrong fucking sub.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 04:46 PM
1

I can't help but read sarcasm sometimes. Carry on sir.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 02:15 PM
-4

I don't see anything about that sentence that is opinionated. Women do make up fewer positions in tech and STEM fields in general. Seems like news reporting the facts to me. Now if they charged that fact with other language that made it sound like discriminatory practices were at hand then it would be a different story. I don't see that here in this instance.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 01:41 PM
0

Is this a second person I'll waste no further time communicating with?
/r/MensRights11/01/17 01:31 PM
1

I'm beginning to think you're an anti-vaxxer. Can you confirm or deny so I know how much time to invest in interacting with you further?
/r/MensRights11/01/17 05:32 AM
1

I am not in the habit of accepting things on the basis of an abstract, but I'll read that tomorrow sometime. If it's compelling then it's compelling.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 05:24 AM
1

There are people who think vaccines are the cause of diseases, so...
/r/MensRights11/01/17 04:53 AM
1

Okay I haven't read any studies specifically about the vaccine myself but what you've linked isn't exactly damning evidence. It looks like a call to arms for anti-vaxxers limited in scope to HPV vaccines specifically, and that in itself is not confidence inspiring.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 04:51 AM
0

I was expecting something negative in this, that's a good thing though. An instance where boys and girls health are both being considered and cared for on equal ground.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 03:46 PM
1

You've given me some hope that I might find things I like in it. I'll see if my buddy is up for it; if it's still screening at his place, and we'll go make fun of it or something. In all fairness, the above describes every movie we go and see. It's probably a good thing we go well after most of them have peaked or I'd get his guest pass revoked.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 01:39 AM
2

I still expect it to be shitty and I'm not supporting it. I have a friend that works at a cinema and he gets a free guest once a week or something like that.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 10:46 PM
13

I wasn't interested before, now I want to see it. Good job delusional outrage, you're peaking my interest again.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 03:44 PM
2

Zero context, indecipherable conversation. Quality content you got here OP. Just stellar! /s
/r/MensRights31/12/16 10:36 PM
1

Watching you try to apply logic is pathetic.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 07:37 AM
2

Is there some logic in there other than a no true Scotsman fallacy? "I'm not alt-right because they're mostly christian" Casting aspersions based on that flawed logic is inept at best. But I'll appease you and emend my above statement. You're an alt-right evangelist and more than a little bit retarded, you sir are just fucking dumb.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 07:19 AM
2

No you're what I've come to call the alt-right evangelist. Nothing anyone says is going to affect the way you perceive the world, even if it is entirely fabricated nonsense.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 05:37 AM
2

Well, his history also includes stuff about pizzagate. I'm not surprised he's retarded.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 03:52 AM
5

You're going to the same extreme as feminists bub, that's a little bit retarded.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 02:49 AM
8

What about this is sexist?
/r/MensRights14/12/16 02:29 AM
19

I've been to Pizza Huts, they don't enforce these things at all. I'm not even sure why it is in their application process.
/r/MensRights11/12/16 07:06 PM
3

I skimmed OPs post, which is my habit when reading things on reddit, and missed that detail. I'm also one of those people that select a gender pronoun and write with it dominantly because it's more coherent and simple. "He" is shorter than "she" too, and I'm lazy. My comment isn't going to have an altered meaning if you substitute "he" with "she," or any other pronouns people decide to use.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 08:28 PM
13

That TA won't get his hands on another assignment from OP. Going off rubric like that is a reason to not let them grade anything again.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 10:26 AM
1

It'll be as active as it has ever been!
/r/MensRights29/10/16 07:38 PM
7

c) I care very little about the draft, it hasn't been an active thing for a long time. It probably won't be reinstated unless a war occurs on US land.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 05:03 PM
10

So they set up an automod to screen for the word mutilation? That seems kinda petty.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 05:24 AM
3

Loud and clear. Thanks.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 07:10 PM
3

I don't understand this post. Can you clarify OP?
/r/MensRights20/09/16 06:55 PM
3

It's been a while since we've gotten anything right. Too much stupid in office.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 06:04 AM
5

Ah, Catholic explains quite a lot here.
/r/MensRights13/09/16 02:58 PM
3

Oh it's great because Islam is basically the original Mormonism. Shit is so blatantly copying the stuff that was already around, it even lifts some verses word for word here and there.
/r/MensRights07/08/16 05:52 AM
31

Why are they trying to pull the video from social media? How exactly do they think they'll manage this feat?
/r/MensRights16/06/16 12:27 AM
3

Sample size is too small to really mean much, if they collect data on a few thousand kids it might be meaningful.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 01:41 PM
1

Dog piling. Is that really the descriptor you want to use?
/r/MensRights31/05/16 03:01 PM
1

Well, Trump isn't Hitler. Pick any African president though.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 07:00 PM
1

I remember her post about the maker fair and at the time I thought she was just a novice tech enthusiast. She's considerably more interesting than I first credited her and I feel a bit dumb for dismissing her so quickly.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 06:46 PM
1

There's a difference between spiritual and dogmatic. I'm an atheist and I much prefer the former to the latter. This rape culture nonsense is absolutely dogmatic bullshit.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 06:37 PM
1

Someone accused sexycyborg of being vapid dumb And sheltered. She long form held up a mirror.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 06:33 PM
4

You're not going to have as many hardworking americans if no one can afford the degrees employers demand. I don't exactly support the concept of "free college" but its clear something has to be done to bring tuition fees back to a realistic expenditure. My dad funded his four year college off a convenience store clerk position and a paper route. That isn't possible now, its barely possible with a full time job and federal aid funding.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 04:54 PM
6

Controlling tuition fees? I don't have any substantial answers to that though.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 02:08 PM
14

By raising tuition fees?
/r/MensRights21/04/16 01:44 PM
2

Yes because it is technically an HIPAA violation.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 04:18 PM
17

We killed an AI for exactly that so...yeah...pretty much.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 10:12 PM
1

I guess we're ignoring the history of dictatorial oligarchies now.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 06:30 AM
17

Can you imagine the mothers day cards? Mom, you're a failure.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 12:44 PM
3

I lean pretty hard away from Hillary more because she panders than any actual issues. Not saying I don't take issue with some of her ideas, but she's just full of shit overall so I don't have much to even consider in her favor. Even if she says something positive, I can't take it at face value because she is always within recent memory campaigning with a polar opposite message.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 01:07 AM
3

My understanding was that he would have to be there to sign it for his name to appear. I couldn't get out of work to go sign it, so my name isn't on my daughter's. All I have is the acknowledgement of paternity thing. If she comes after child support then he can ask for a paternity test. The only drawback there is that he'd have to pay for it if it turns out to be his, and the court paternity test isn't cheap.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 10:32 PM
3

~6:50 they get honked at while talking about cat calls. Excuse me if I'm ignorant but isn't that a cat call in most places?
/r/MensRights13/08/15 01:13 AM
-1

Experience doesn't really mark a troll. Completely disregarding relevant points and trying to make a sensationalist argument that is factually misleading and almost entirely baseless is trolling.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 12:14 AM
-1

No I'm not kidding. Yup, since the half dozen replaced is a silly argument that only works when you have no practical knowledge of retail work. No one has been replaced. The only change is volume of customers with small orders. Not crazy at all, just experienced enough in the retail field to see the actual benefit compared to the fear mongering bullshit you're currently spewing. DVD stores were doomed to fail. Internet streaming. How many jobs were lost when video stores went under? How many job…
/r/MensRights04/08/15 11:54 PM
-4

I'm only going to respond to one item because you don't deserve any more of my time. I think this is the most relevant thing any alarmist is going to ever say. Rough translation for everyone else "I'm right and I'm going to give fuck all to any other opinion. Go me because I'm awesome and you suck." Well played.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 10:16 PM
-2

Supermarkets used to have three to five checkstands open with cashiers at any given time, except for off hours. And they still do, because supermarkets are higher volume and the self service lanes are for convenience to customers. They haven't reduced the employees a single iota unless you live in bumfuck nowhere. Where having a full staff would be moronic. I've seen stores that literally do not have human checkstands after 10 PM, just the attendant and the automated lines The lane immediately b…
/r/MensRights04/08/15 09:52 PM
-4

If you don't understand how paying 1 person minimum wage is cheaper than paying 7 people minimum wage Those big companies were only going to have one person there to begin with. When is the last time you went through walmart and saw every register with a cashier? Oh black friday? Christmas? The attendant is there as a medium for people who aren't comfortable or have trouble operating the self check out registers. They do not take the place of a supervisor. You're right, they don't require breaks…
/r/MensRights04/08/15 08:58 PM
-1

I really hate these kinds alarmist articles. Literally no jobs are being replaced in the near future. Probably not even for a few decades. Yeah we have robots that can do some of these things, but they cost a fuck ton of money and its immensely cheaper to employ human labor. "But automated check out" Shut the fuck up there is an attendant standing there. They can just help more people at once instead of standing uncomfortably at a register with a long line and dreading every transaction more tha…
/r/MensRights04/08/15 07:26 PM
1

Hey, you can't talk about the beat stick unless you're still in the military.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 01:41 AM
5

I felt my IQ drop after reading this. while the women dress for the season. If you know your office is going to have the ac on then maybe you should dress accordingly, like the men. I mean really. This is self induced torture.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 12:39 AM
2

I blame online dating for the most part on that one.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 01:39 AM
1

I wish I could say no. I really do. ...sigh. I wonder how many death threats are going to be strewn from this one.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 08:28 PM
3

She was paid for her time so really she doesn't have much of a case here. Am I wrong somehow?
/r/MensRights20/07/15 11:24 AM
1

You need council buddy. You seriously need to talk to somebody who can help you cope. I'm not qualified and neither is reddit. For your own well being please try to find a therapist. You don't have to do anything you don't want to do, I'd just encourage you to give it a try.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 07:19 AM
14

Yep. Also really you should probably have spoken to HR about both people you mentioned. It might be too late now, but at the very least you could contact them and talk to someone about it. There may be something that can be done, there may not. I don't know, but I wouldn't sit on it any longer than you already have.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 01:09 PM
6

I just don't see the point in this one other than one perceived victim saying "hey we're bigger victims!" Edit: I was talking about the feminists saying "hey look at us more."
/r/MensRights06/06/15 12:57 PM
8

Am lactose intolerant. Guys I'm guaranteed three hots and a cot next time I forget to exclude cheese from my burger.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 07:28 AM
2

I haven't had an opportunity to talk to someone of that mindset but I'm pretty sure my reaction would have been similar. Kudos to you for not being cajoled into silence and breaking the conversation.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 06:57 AM
1

Sex education is pretty terrible in the US, I had never heard of anything mentioned in the video before.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 01:27 PM
9

That was extremely educational. I appreciate content like this and its extraordinary what I've learned on this sub. Thank you OP for sharing this.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 11:11 PM
8

I feel like if he had done nothing everyone would hate him. But shit I'd have been pretty tempted to just go grab a beer and forget about the whole thing.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 08:16 AM
7

That's what happens when you go to the cosmetologist who didn't graduate high school.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 08:27 PM
1

I agree with you. I shamelessly plug my humor in.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 08:32 PM
3

HE WAS WEARING A SPEEDO TO WORK. Sounds to me like he was trying to say something pretty loud.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 05:56 PM
2

Yep I almost got arrested a few years ago in a domestic dispute that I was a non participant of. Simply because I was there.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 06:50 AM
29

Actually we'll tell you what your ideas should be.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 02:01 AM
1

Where did I deny special treatment was afforded to any social entity? I simply directed attention to something that was clearly superfluous and irrelevant to the article. Which in and of itself is also special treatment. I love this sub, I think its a great place. The community is supportive; albeit sometimes very bitter which is perfectly understandable, and most of the time I've spent here has been very positive. I don't see remarks like the one I directed attention to often, and i never see t…
/r/MensRights31/08/14 08:20 PM
4

Okay let me direct my outrage a bit more towards the problem. just like most minorities and gays. Really? Does that need to be there?
/r/MensRights31/08/14 04:03 AM
3

What the hell is wrong with the comment section on there? Yep.. Women dont want “equal” treatment, just like most minorities and gays, they want special treatment.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 01:48 AM
2

I know one dude who is an aspiring journalist, to his credit he's still in college.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 06:58 PM
1

Well sarcasm aside, that is how male rape is portrayed in porn. Its something we're supposed to just say "oh, no wait this is sex I must enjoy this now".
/r/MensRights06/07/14 07:03 PM
1

Directions were too clear you've wandered into a cross gender apartment complex.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 05:24 AM
1

But all the porn has taught me that the poor delivery man gets raped.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 05:22 AM
6

*They'll brainstorm up a mechanics tool set.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 05:21 AM
1

I said can opener not bottle opener. I'll give you points for creativity though.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 04:41 PM
1

I kind of hope you meant its a ridiculous expectation to have. I'm a nice enough guy and all but I can't always control the whole mental strip impulse.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 12:57 PM
1

She's gonna get some dicks and wear them around the house, bar, neighborhood, possibly the city parks. Solid plan, she's definitely going to be beating the game.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 12:54 PM
1

I didn't give you any points because you weren't wrong, but I need a can opener now.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 12:46 PM
3

Eh projection is a thing. People do it all the time.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 12:44 PM
1

I remember it now. Its been a long time since I've seen that.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 06:16 PM
4

Sounds like a porn to me. Its probably already out.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 04:02 AM
1

Sounds like a good trip to me.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 03:59 AM
4

I don't recognize it. Can you tell me what its from?
/r/MensRights09/06/14 03:55 AM
7

Nah here we understand the sarcasm. Except for the SRS brigade that clearly lurks this sub.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 03:54 AM
9

Jesus, insane parent right there. Telling a child they aren't allowed to read is just twisted.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 03:52 AM
3

We must have chopped it off while they weren't looking, and then before they realized it we reattached it with no visible scars. Damn we're good.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 05:45 PM
1

Wait, so I couldn't sit next to my daughter if I flew to pick her up and bring her back to spend the summers with me?
/r/MensRights03/05/14 05:39 PM
1

Oh man, you'll end up gouging the table or snapping that poor spoon.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 05:37 PM
2

I call batman princess.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 04:19 AM
12

Go shirtless with formal attire. Wrap a tie around your neck.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 02:46 AM
5

If they expect one side to turn off then both sides are required to turn off the emotions. Its not feasible in the slightest. Baring some serious therapy this relationship is probably dead.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 05:46 PM
2

As a guy, yeah. Sometimes its hard to pick through all the burdens I lug around and decide whats really not mine. Broke something? Yeah thats probably mine. Caused a divorce? Uh, I dunno that seems like a stretch but somehow I caught the blame for that. Guess I'll think about that one and just tote it around with me. Caused the end of the world? Okay this one is just silly...but....what if I do? Obviously that last one is a big stretch of the imagination but hey some people do think it from time…
/r/MensRights31/12/13 05:34 PM
3

He was supposed to just know apparently. I understand the woman was a bit hormonal but seriously? Until I've had the conversation with my SO about whether we're ready to have kids the abortion topic is always going to be raised if it reaches that point. (der contraceptives derp) But if I were this guy, that marriage would be over. I couldn't handle a partner that would unilaterally make those decisions for me. It would be like promising children and then going and having a vasectomy done and "tr…
/r/MensRights31/12/13 05:30 PM
9

I've noticed a lot of people over there are having trouble distinguishing between dude being mad about something; anything really, and dude attacking/abusing. I can be mad and not manipulate or verbally/physically attack someone. I can be mad and have a rational conversation; as a matter of fact doing so is the best possible way to alleviate the sudden blast of anger and frustration.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 05:22 PM
6

Because throw away accounts and reversing the sex of the involved parties. You could drop the same scenario and reverse the sexes and get polar answers. I just downvote those irrelevant comments and try to keep anything I submit as ambiguous as possible.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 04:51 PM
6

Yeah its a pretty shitty feeling. Of course its usually that feeling that makes you realize you're now dealing with a really shitty person and that makes moving on a bit easier.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 04:47 PM
2

Your concept of stay at home parent is clearly different from mine.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 10:05 PM
1

They aren't the only circumstances. It was a slightly contrived example. I'm sure there are other circumstances where alimony is awarded, but its generally something that one has to pursue.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 10:59 AM
3

Not in the slightest. I was aiming more at general income to support oneself. It shouldn't extend any more than six months imo, and thats stretching it out quite a bit. I don't expect someone to land a career, I expect them to get a job.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 05:18 AM
0

I didn't say anyone deserved it. But the idea of divorce equaling out on the street is ridiculous from any perspective. Having said that; when divorce rears its head its probably time to start looking for work anyway. So I'm not saying some indefinitely long alimony period. It should be a finite and short period of time to assist in arranging income and living arrangements between two parents. It should not provide income beyond basic living requirements for that short period of time. I'm speaki…
/r/MensRights29/12/13 12:40 AM
4

Yeah...I did that on purpose. Wishful thinking and hopes for fair treatment.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 09:47 PM
15

In some situations it is appropriate. Think about the stay at home dad here. He hasn't had work in a decade of raising three kids and his wife has been the one making money. She is for some reason unhappy with the situation and decides to either jump straight for divorce or cheat until she eventually gets caught and get slapped with divorce. Now this poor ex-husband assumingly doesn't own the house they lived in and has no real income. Because he has sacrificed his professional career to attend …
/r/MensRights28/12/13 08:00 PM
-3

Yeah, I like to cuddle as much as anyone else. But I'm not going to pay a stranger for cuddling. This is why I have friends. And as for asking someone to pay me to cuddle with them....that just feels like prostitution. I mean seriously if someone needs a hug and some comfort and I tell them they have to pay me for it....what in the actual fuck have I just become? At least a prostitute is just selling sex, this cuddling industry is something I'm actually finding seriously disturbing. They aren't …
/r/MensRights14/12/13 07:18 PM
8

Documentation of your living arrangements and scheduling whatever activities are the usual day to day stuff. Does she go to day care? Where does she go after day care? How many consecutive days is she with you? Things like that would establish a decent chunk of evidence that you are the sole caretaker.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 07:12 PM
-2

To be honest they very well could be. Its not like the dating industry is any different.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 07:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter