| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The problem with alpha fucks/ beta bucks (AF/BB)The inconsistency you expose is only one of the many the TRP hypothesis has. You could also say that is non-sense that the beta male will be a better provider most of the time. Also, the vast majority of this women will have children with the beta male, failing stupidly to get the genes from the alpha. And you can go on for a while. The problem with the TRP is that it rationalizes an observation and tries to explain it in terms of a primitive behavior. But that makes no sense in our society. Yes… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/21 05:09 AM |
| – | When a woman makes a man jump through hoops for sex, he should immediately discard her and find another womanThis is an useless advice for a lot of men out there. Because some women would have sex on the first date and other women would wait weeks before even discussing that. How easy it is to get there can tell you a lot about the woman you are dating. And even when there is nothing wrong with either case, many guys would feel more comfortable with one or the other. Then, a man wanting a woman that doesn't jump into bed the first day is going to do the opposite of what this post advices. I'd advice to… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/07/21 04:30 AM |
| 2 | Q4All: How are we supposed to take dates seriously if they're sleeping around?Group A holds people that fall in love. Group C, people that may fall in love. Group B, people that can't fall in love. For anyone in A the real danger will be people in C. Because they are going to be harder to spot. The may eventually fall in love. But until they agree on being official they will be sleeping around while you are stupidly in love. Been there. [UPDATE] There is a significant difference in how group A and the other two see monogamy. For A it is something that makes sense. For the… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/07/21 03:55 AM |
| 1 | I think that modern feminist views about sexual past crumble as soon as your own brother is at a disadvantageSure this is common. Because there is a difference between what you think is right or wrong in general. And what you think is right or wrong for you. For instance, I'm certain every girl has her right to have sex with all the guys she wants. But I'd never have a girlfriend who's slept with more than ten guys. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/07/18 04:22 AM |
| 1 | CMV: If a woman has any difficulty discussing her sexual past, with few exceptions, it's the ultimate red flag!Great. Then why he's never wanted to hear about it? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/03/18 11:13 PM |
| 1 | CMV: If a woman has any difficulty discussing her sexual past, with few exceptions, it's the ultimate red flag!What do you think would be his reaction if somehow, suddenly, he knew the number and some more details? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/03/18 10:50 PM |
| 1 | Does partner's sexual past matter? Maybe there are exceptions where it shouldn't matter?Who cares about the title when your post is completely sexist? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/03/18 10:42 PM |
| 1 | Does partner's sexual past matter? Maybe there are exceptions where it shouldn't matter?For starters, @Maikowski2, why should it be different for a woman than for a man? Your approach to this subject is from a slut shaming point of view. Now, of course your partner's sexual past matters. Whether it's your boyfriend or girlfriend, his or her sexual past matters. Because there's a good deal of values that can be perceived there. And value matching is core to a relationship. Of course your example about rapping is ridiculous and doesn't work. So let's say your girlfriend used make fun… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/03/18 04:46 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter