TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

pranavlko Archive

View 0 posts and 38 comments by pranavlko on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

THEY CANT GO AROUND DOING THAT. Women are much less capable of physical abuse, they are physically weaker than men, not buddha reincarnates.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/26 01:12 AM
2

What are you on about? Try not to get distracted You replied to -- "Thus confidence remains universally praised, endlessly debated, and almost never defined." Which is something important he pointed out, two people discussing something about confidence should first make sure they mean the same thing by the term confidence. Does this not make sense to you? You responded to him -- "And confidence has been defined. Look it up." He meant not defined by the people "endlessly debating" the word, you m…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 04:10 AM
1

"And confidence has been defined. Look it up." Define means "give meaning to". Dictionaries don't give meaning to terms, they track meanings of terms. The point is that different people have different ideas in their minds when using ambiguous words like confidence or love. "For me, confidence is .... bla bla bla". So in discussions having to do with ambiguous terms ... like confidence ... the two people should each first state what idea they are trying to communicate using the word. This prevent…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 02:17 AM
8

Your factually incorrect, deceitful comments are getting the downvotes they deserve. Self harm rates are mentioned in the link, not suicide rates.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 10:43 AM
8

Dude .. read the article, she is lying. It has mentioned self harm rates, not suicide rates.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 10:35 AM
11

Read the link, she's lying. It has mentioned self harm rates, not suicide rates. Generally, self harm like cutting yourself to temporarily numb emotional pain, is much more common in young girls compared to young boys (and suicide is in young boys), so this is not some unrepresentative statistic pointing something unusual happening at the centers.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 10:31 AM
7

He didn't, his wife did. The donation gave biological children to his wife, not to him.
/r/MensRights30/08/25 12:11 AM
0

Chauvinism is not misogyny.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 12:52 AM
106

No, "decenter even respectful young men and uplift even interrupting young women" did. This is the kind of stuff that gets retarded biased laws passed. Just deal with problematic students on an individual basis. But no, idiots like you and the teacher exist whose whole worldview is a bunch of stereotypes and generalizations.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 08:58 AM
11

For something to be sexist it needs to be incorrect. If you don't know if something is true or not, it makes no sense to call it sexist.
/r/MensRights02/11/24 12:28 PM
3

Don't think she's lying, what she meant here by fuckzoned is not what it usually means. She meant when the guy and girl are friends, if the guy wants sex he's "fuckzoning" her and if he wants her to be his GF he's "girlfriendzoning" her. Funny argument the two are having.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 10:52 PM
3

I can provide explanations for many of the patterns you brought up, but that's not the point. But I'll still state a few things to prove that you failed to think from first principles. -- Rapes -- When men rape women, it's often when they are horny / when they feel turned on by a particular woman who's not attracted to them. Women have to just pick up their phones when they are horny, or rub their tits when the not particularly attracted to them/out of league guy happens to look at them. She'll …
/r/MensRights05/09/24 02:51 AM
7

Do some women not know that men are significantly stronger than them? Of course it's going to be much harder for women to strangulate, severely beat men. Even if the woman starts a fight, if it escalates enough to end with a death, the deceased is much more likely to be the woman. You're not "inherently more peaceful", you're just weaker lol I've never seen a woman define what she means precisely by "men are inherently more violent" or suggest how this comparison can be done. Pointing to statist…
/r/MensRights05/09/24 12:17 AM
17

Circumcision ( Foreskin is used by the cosmetic industry btw )
/r/MensRights23/08/24 11:40 AM
1

Why would they .. you didn't convey which one you meant, you know
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 06:31 PM
3

And rightfully so because that's a vague statement. It doesn't convey if you mean that they are just statistically more likely to be violent or if they are inherently more violent. For the latter you'd first have to define what "inherently more violent" means for it to be meaningful. For the former people would have no choice but to agree with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 06:06 PM
4

What age are you referring to by "young boys"? You mention "before puberty". You are not implying that a significant fraction of murders are being committed by kids who haven't even reached puberty are you? Also, one significant reason girls don't engage in violence as much is that it can leave you physically deformed, a deformity like a broken front tooth for example will affect a girl's value in society much more than a guy's. How can a woman rape a corpse in the first place? Can blood flow in…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 09:40 AM
2

Keep making stuff up. Getting called out for being dishonest hurts, I get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 11:44 AM
1

Ok, what was the rude thing that the guy did then?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 03:31 AM
1

The really dirty secret is that the main reason male male friendships are different from female female friendships is that most men are straight but many or most women are bisexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 10:28 PM
1

Guy approaches girl, the girl doesn't consent to talking with him, communicates this by calling him a creep, and he's the one who's rude. Is that right?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 09:33 PM
1

.... He's not confirming any suspicion. Not repulsive doesn't mean sexually attractive. The hug conveys that the woman felt safe and comfortable enough to hug him. This in itself is a kind of connection. Straight men are much more interested in connecting with women than with men. Women have no idea just how much more because many if not most women are bisexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 09:12 PM
14

It's not about pride, it's about respecting other people enough that you don't want to take advantage of them. About not having the mindset that you are doing the man a favour by giving him your company. If you think so, just don't come. There's no excuse for expecting the man to pay in 2024. "Whoever asks the other out pays" is also defective although it's succeeding at manipulating many men. When you suggest eating out to your friends, they do not expect you to foot the bill alone.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 08:20 PM
38

You're right. More and more men are realizing that women chase men with status, and so are chasing status. Because status chasing is spiritually corrosive, I can only see the world getting more and more depraved and hedonistic.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 07:54 PM
-1

This is what happens when so many men keep shouting "we men, we protector and provider" everywhere.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 07:33 PM
1

The comparison is between your status in Southern Europe and that in India. The latter will be much higher.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 09:30 PM
3

It's true, overall it's quite dirty compared to the west, but it depends on where you live. You're chinese, the girls will still see a random man from china as higher status than a random from India. But just in case you actually ever consider this, as you might guess from Indo china relations, there will be xenophobia.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 02:53 PM
6

That's simply not true. For example, literally any white man who spends time in India will feel a significant rise in his social status. Women are attracted to men who have higher status than them, the higher the status the more intense the attraction. It's not about how much the women wants access to his money, she literally feels attracted because of his status in society. So unattractive white guys who want the experience of running through hot girls, you are welcome to India XDD
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 02:15 PM

... as opposed to trusting a bear with her.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 12:25 PM
4

Because heterosexual attraction is not symmetrical. There needs to be a master - slave dynamic of sorts between the man and woman for there to be attraction. Women talk about wanting their man to be "dominant" "leader in the relationship" etc. Nice guys don't treat women as less than them, and their feminist behavior makes them sexually unattractive. The bad boys don't give too much respect to what women say, and don't give them too much attention, something a master would do to his slave, and t…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 06:45 PM
1

"You think my paying for my own coffee/app/beverage/meal is an indication of mutual investment and interest" No, what he's saying is "mutual investment and interest should result in the woman wanting to pay her share, because she's not doing the man a favour by giving him her company"
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 03:09 PM
1

OP is talking about the manipulation which leads to men feeling this way. Manipulation is faulty, no?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/23 02:12 AM
5

True, wish more people used dictionaries!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 11:49 PM
1

Master-slave relationship essential for heterosexual romance? A comment by a scientist- "Aaronson is NOT complaining, he is explaining. And what he is explaining is true, and relatively new, so it should be listened to. It has nothing much to do with privilege, or maleness, or nerdiness. It has to do with the incompatibility of heterosexuality with feminist ideology. As a man, you have to choose between a deep understanding of feminism and being sexually active. It's one or the other. It's next …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/10/19 04:16 AM
3

She wouldnt likely be alive if she did that
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/09/19 10:55 PM
-5

Also, I forgot to add, the probability of a given woman being a pussy is greater than the probability of a given man being a pussy. So there's another angle about halfhearted attempts. (Yes, bring the hate, feminists!)
/r/MensRights31/07/14 05:30 AM
3

Careful! You are being extremely politically incorrect.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 05:16 AM
1

This is the most stupid thing I've read in a long time.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 10:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter