TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

pranomostro Archive

View 1 post and 39 comments by pranomostro on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Discussionpranomostro/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/18 07:46 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Also noteworthy is that only 8\% of women were sexless in 2016 while 14\% of men were. LOL. Keep in mind that this is self-reported data, and men usually over-report, while women under-report, even in anonymous studies. I suspect it to be higher.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/18 02:38 PM
1

Nevermind, was a stupid comment. I didn't understand yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/18 10:27 PM
1

between the physical attraction and the mental attraction of "he's so confident he has zero problems dancing". Is the bar really that low?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/18 10:20 PM
1

You can enthusiastically consent through actions. I think that this would fall under the category of intent, not consent. See here: Intent is defined in section 8A “to denote that the actor desires to cause consequences of his act, or that he believes that the consequences are substantially certain to result from it.” (page 15), see also a discussion about the separation between consent and intent from page 45 on. I think I read a paper that explained the difference a bit clearer and shorter, bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/18 10:59 PM
3

Yes. But /u/Triadis3 displays the most crucial point of TRP – if you want more than that from your relationship, the chance that you won't get it (and that your relationship is destined to fail) is much much higher. You can't be loved in the way you would really like to, you can't expect comfort and relaxation, you can't expect to be able to trust uncoditionally. This is all he will be able to safely get, and if that's it, then he's fine with it. The problem TRP sees with men is that they expect…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/18 10:40 PM
0

Dolphins and primates can be seen to consent to human intimacy, I think. They can't. They do intent, as far as I have heard, but real consent (TM) can only be verbal, at least in the legal sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/18 10:08 PM
1

Should we legislate on what makes us feel gross instead of sound, intellectually consistent policy? No. Our thinking should be consistent, but our laws should represent what is a majority opinion. Hegel calls this Sittlichkeit, being the unspoken rules and laws of a society, and not fucking animals, although it being the logically more consistent choice, is just outside of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/18 10:07 PM
1

You are actually changing your body, not painting on abs with spray tan. I'd say that the way you appear to people is the way you are to people. It doesn't matter whether it is genuine or not, it is the way you are from now on. And if you fake confident well enough, you are confident.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/18 09:59 PM
2

Maybe you haven't realized it yet, but TRP is a bunch of fucking nerds. Seriously. Have you read The Rational Male? That's a really nice model built to explain the world, almost hand-crafted. No non-nerd would do something like that. And like all nerds, they really have to explicitely learn how to behave in a normal way and be non-nerdy for a little while to get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/18 09:56 PM
1

I would say that men are driven up more by it, due to a higher sex drive, though how much higher is a matter of debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/18 09:50 PM
1

Well, kinda: One of these social conventions that operates in the spectrum of the personal to the societal is the idea of ‘leagues’. The fundamental idea that Social Matching Theory details is that “All things being equal, an individual will tend to be attracted to, and are more likely to pair off with, another individual who is of the same or like degree of physical attractiveness as themselves.” In a vacuum, this is the germ of the idea behind the ‘leagues’. The social convention of ‘leagues’ …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/18 04:39 PM
79

"Better to aim high and fail than to aim low and succeed."
/r/TheRedPill01/05/18 04:28 AM
1

That's a great point. Ugh. So much neuroticism. The analogy with the experience in india also lacks the fact that women might actually want to have sex with men – but not at that rate.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/18 04:00 PM
1

See the first and the second meditation on privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/18 07:12 AM
1

Sure. I just wanted to add some professional (?) information to the discussion. So purely logically your response was correct, as in that not all, but just most societies are monogamous.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/18 07:08 PM
1

/r/AskAnthropology on why monogamy is the norm in the majority of human societies.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/18 06:46 PM
1

This whole discussion: A: "I do this" B: "I don't" A: "You're wrong." B: "no u"
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/18 06:28 PM
2

Way too many. I mean, I like people, but the heck, stop being so benevolently sexist!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/18 06:19 PM
1

I was eating alone in the dorm cafeteria -- as usual -- a girl sat down and started to talk to me This does happen?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/18 11:39 PM
1

Love is just a happiness loan.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/18 11:38 PM
2

I find the label quite hard to define actually. Is it a sub- or superset of the foreveralone crowd? Does it prescribe physical unattractiveness, or lack of social skills, or hating women, or being short, or what?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/18 11:16 PM
1

I move quite a lot in extremely radical left circles in real life, and I'm very close friends with two people most people would consider "ultra-sjws", and when I talk to them about MRM-stuff, or how shitty the world is for me, they are always understanding and seem like they didn't think about this at all. This is of course worrying in itself, but I don't see a clear "anti-men" sentiment in contemporary feminism, only with the second (radical) force (fuck you, Shulamith Firestone).
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/18 10:10 AM
-1

Of course everybody needs MRM. Not in opposition with feminism, but with it. I think /r/menslib is what I'd propose as a good example of how this should be done.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/18 09:11 AM
2

oh god
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/18 03:31 PM
1

true dat
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/18 10:26 AM
1

I wouldn't exclude the possibility. Although not falling in love at all is a nice viable option.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/18 12:30 PM
4

I assumed a quite hypothetical situation where nothing changes except my sex drive. I know that that's not very realistic. But in my experience, my sexual drive is more likely to be detrimental to what I want to occupy myself with (I would argue that my interest in programming or philosophy doesn't come from a very competitive or aggressive background).
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/18 07:59 PM
2

I'm not suddenly become a extrovert just because I really want to and try hard. I can report that this indeed did happen with me, not suddenly of course, but over the course of 3 years (from being 17 to being 20), I found out how to have a good conversation and be outgoing. Maybe I'm just lucky, but it did happen (maybe it was the people around me who changed, but I dunno).
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/18 04:51 PM
1

I believe that the core part that might make it effective is simply talking to women, and trying to actively combat nervousness. I believe that this might be the most (only?) effective part of it. Other than that, probably no.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/18 09:37 PM
2

As is waterboarding. Or sleep deprivation.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/18 09:31 PM
2

All RedPill men will generally share one thing in common, in my opinion - and this is top secret news here: we all have had one or more women basically throw themselves at us in devotion and dedication, and we turned up our nose at her (or them) - and chose instead to chase a troubled soul, a difficult woman, someone who could really never be ours. Relationships is not what we want, for the most part, its healing and self-empowerment. I loved your answer, but this part is a bit confusing for me.…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/18 09:30 PM
1

"Meaning" doesn't have any relevance to nature. Just thought I should point this out to you. Meaning has actually a lot of relevance to people, for example myself. I don't know whether you consider people to be part of nature, or apart from it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/18 09:18 PM
1

I don't doubt it, so thanks for the studies.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/18 02:26 PM
1

I've got a feeling that this is true, but could you (by any chance) link some evidence for this?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/18 10:07 AM
1

If I needed friends but wouldn't have any, I'd buy a dog. But I do have friends. That's not the issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/18 12:09 PM
1

Detaching romance and friendship from sexuality, overcoming nature in the sense of gaining control over one's own sexuality. If it was a feasible option, which it isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 10:30 PM
2

heh
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 10:28 PM
2

Moreover, sexbots make lots of men admit they are sexist pigs ("I only want women for sex and I'd rather they didn't come with thoughts/ideas/opinions/agency") I believe that there's more to that. Maybe it's just my personal experience, but it seems to me that sexual drive hinders a lot of friendship between men and women, and if that were removed from the equation it would be a lot easier to lift the relation from a sexual onto an intellectual/whatever level.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 10:24 PM
1

But it's the same thing as well for men, what's a woman gonna do? Still, no guy I know initiates conversations with random strangers regularly.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/18 09:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter