TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

pretendent Archive

View 0 posts and 12 comments by pretendent on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

They clearly classify you as not one of the "good men", so your existence as a single man does not mean there are good men available, from their perspective. In fact, I would say this "debate" could be a lot shorter if you simply understood the perspective of these "liberal women" instead of asserting your perspective endlessly. Like, it may feel good to do so and say that your beliefs are absolutely right, but it will not get you a date. You're gonna need to change strategy, empathize with the …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/21 05:57 PM
4

Well, it is technically true that your vote for Trump is not what gives "liberal females" the right to choose not to date you.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/21 05:51 PM
1

Hey, whoa there sparky. I'm not in favor of circumcision either. But it's still technically the LACK of regulation. That is, in fact, the limit of what I was saying.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 01:07 AM
1

That's still a LACK of regulation of men's bodies.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 07:42 AM
0

That tarfogog's original statement that "The news only says men or man if its something bad" was demonstrably false, and it took only the first article found to prove it false.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 04:08 AM
16

Absolutely, which is why you need to sterilize your dick with fire before you put it in a vagina.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 08:38 AM
51

That would not explain his use of "laws", as in "the men's movement... must eventually, ensure that... laws... are enforced against them [women who shoo suitors away]." Those are words that are hard to misinterpret, and no, the edits do not change the meaning, they merely cut straight to the point.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 01:17 AM
1

denying men stable marriages This implies that men have a right to a stable marriage, but if a person is entitled to a positive good, it is somebody's responsibility to supply that good. Women do not have such a responsibility, since people own their own bodies, and have sole discretion over who and when they allow others access to said body. That's just 1 part of why you're being downvoted.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 09:45 AM
3

I would rephrase the second point as "the right of female custody as enshrined in law was an indirect result of a bill passed through feminist activism by Norton" I do not state that an assumption of maternal custody was Norton's goal. That is not the goal that one would get from a bill that creates a right to petition for custody. Whether Norton herself believed mothers should always receive custody is unknowable, and irrelevant.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 03:51 PM
5

I'm pretty certain Magic8BallMan didn't have much of a point except that men are discriminated against because of feminism and this Wikipedia article is evidence of that. It would then seem wrong to claim that a system which is defined by it granting prime authority and power to fathers would be motivated to hold up maternal authority in direct contradiction to its definition. You simply must be joking. Let's look at a quote from one of the primary supporters of the bill in Parliament, shall we?…
/r/MensRights19/08/12 02:12 PM
3

Does it? My argument is that the purely civil right that feminists fought for was quite balanced in the way it was written, and then the legal systems used established ideas of women being natural care-givers whose place was at home raising children and keeping a house that created the Tender Years Doctrine.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 09:51 AM
17

Incorrect. Feminist Caroline Norton separated from her husband and was denied custody of her children because the law of the time gave Fathers custody regardless of circumstances. She convinced Parliament to pass a bill that allowed a mother to PETITION a court for custody of her children. When the bill was added on to in 1873 it established the precedent that "custody should be determined by the needs of the child rather than the rights of either parent" The Tender Years doctrine was the way th…
/r/MensRights18/08/12 02:52 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter