TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

pretzelzetzel Archive

View 4 posts and 369 comments by pretzelzetzel on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

This is totally irrelevant, but I'm not a woman.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/09/20 07:10 AM
1

If "mainstream feminism" were actually mainstream, then they would be the most well known voices in that scene They are and their goals and standards would form the template for the future. This is a nonsense sentence. I can tell you've engaged very little with academia in any capacity. You're giving yourself away, see, and I can see that you are. You're making yourself look really goofy. Equality stopped being the byword for feminism when SCOTUS ruled on Roe v. Wade. Expand Everything since the…
/r/PussyPassDenied06/09/20 05:45 AM
0

How about 40 years of listening to what feminists say That's what I'm asking, though. What does this "listening what feminists have to say" actually consist of? How much do you honestly engage with mainstream feminism? I know the answer is "not whatsoever" because of the way you're saying things that are false as though they were true. To people who know what the actual truth is, it can be very frustrating to see someone refuse to drop a bluff when it's called on them. I'mma disengage from this …
/r/PussyPassDenied06/09/20 04:56 AM
2

It's literally not a baby, though. It's called a fetus. Aborting one isn't murder.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/09/20 12:52 AM
0

In 40 years I have NEVER heard a feminist suggest that men have problems that women don't You read a lot of feminist theory in that 40 years? Or are you talking about 40 years of existing in your little mysogynistic echo chamber and refusing to challenge your preconceived notions?
/r/PussyPassDenied06/09/20 12:52 AM
1

That's not a baby. That's a fetus.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/09/20 10:25 PM
1

Those are all feminist talking points, though, you dumb cunt
/r/PussyPassDenied29/08/20 04:58 PM
1

I can kill my and my husband's baby and he doesn't have a say That's.... not true
/r/PussyPassDenied29/08/20 04:50 PM
1

https://i.imgur.com/fhkaxur.png Dummy.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 03:20 AM
1

What?
/r/MensRights10/03/20 02:22 AM
0

Yes you were. That was the comment you initially replied to.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 02:22 AM
0

I did, as you can see from the part of my original comment I copied above.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 01:16 AM
0

I'm not talking about celebrities, you tool. Read my comment. Have you read enough feminist theory that you can make a strong claim like "most"? Please cite a representative sample to support your claim. Academics. Celebrities talking about bullshit on twitter counts for nothing. If that's your only experience with "feminism", you're in bad shape.
/r/MensRights09/03/20 11:23 PM
-1

I have heard every feminist claim they are not against men the contradict that claim by saying all men are trash, all men are pigs and all men are rapists. Name a single one
/r/MensRights09/03/20 11:08 PM
-4

All the time in the world
/r/MensRights09/03/20 07:33 PM
-7

most feminism isnt pro women. its just anti men This looks like a factual claim. Can you substantiate that? Have you read enough feminist theory that you can make a strong claim like "most"? Please cite a representative sample to support your claim.
/r/MensRights09/03/20 06:12 PM
1

If the pay gap is largely accounted for by women's tendency to choose careers that pay less and take time off work due to pregnancy That's not what the pay gap is.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 02:41 AM
0

Nobody is shitting on him for helping.
/r/MensRights28/01/20 03:34 AM
1

I knew this subreddit was bad, and now I know it's really fucking bad. Holy fuck, y'all.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 06:14 PM
1

I'm not saying he's lying. I am, though, beginning to believe that you are deliberately misinterpreting my statements. I have stated repeatedly that I'm not discussing the validity of his subjective claims, I am discussing the validity of his objective claims. In any case, I'm retiring from this argument, and you're more than welcome to tell yourself you "won".
/r/MensRights24/10/19 05:30 AM
1

I'm not dismissing them. They're as valid as any subjective experience. I'm saying that his experiences don't entitle him to state that he's been the victim of systematic oppression, which is an empirical claim that doesn't hold up.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 05:16 AM
1

You've got your argument backwards. You say "being affected by institutional sexism" as though it were an agreed fact, but it is the very point I'm contesting. You can't just presume it.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 04:28 AM
1

Other way round, I think you'll find, if you read my comment again. It's that his subjective experiences have no influence or effect on the objective nature of reality.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 04:26 AM
-1

No. I'm saying it's not institutionalized. That has nothing to do with his experiences.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 02:47 AM
-5

My point is that you're actually not the victim of institutionalized sexism.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 06:48 PM
-8

Yeah, about that "narrative". When you notice that an opinion you hold is really uncommon; and that a vast majority of people disagree; and that the more educated people are, the more likely they are to disagree; there are really two possibilities as to why this might be the case: 1) you're wrong; 2) there's a massive global conspiracy involving untold numbers of people and sums of money. One of those is very probable, and the other is not very probable.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 05:26 PM
-3

You should try posting this somewhere that isn't an echo chamber built around opinions exactly like this. That way, instead of becoming further entrenched in your views, which are formed almost purely from your personal experience, you might have the benefit of hearing a) the experiences of others, and b) objective arguments that would provide you with some nuance.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 02:29 PM
1

In the history of real events that actually happened in the physical world, surely this very realistic encounter is one of the most true and accurate.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 02:42 PM
-3

You're right. My reading skills must be very poor indeed, as it appears I have missed the thousands of pages devoted to the women and children who have traditionally held most of the positions of power and been responsible for starting most of history's wars.
/r/MensRights07/10/19 04:52 PM
-4

Unbiased readings of objective history textbooks reveal the same trend. This conspiracy goes deeper than I thought!
/r/MensRights07/10/19 04:43 PM
-11

The one where he contradicted himself updated some material that was more than 20 years old to appeal to the lgbt community be accurate to the current science on the topic Ftfy
/r/MensRights07/10/19 04:42 PM
-27

the second that hard uncaring statistics about how society chews men up and spits them out come up, suddenly it changes to the patriarchy being solely responsible. Can you explain how it was different before women began striving for equal rights, the right vote, etc? Because we do have a control, here. We can compare the situation now to the situation in a time when we know that men controlled everything. If modern society "chews men up and spits them out" and you don't think it's because of pat…
/r/MensRights06/10/19 01:41 PM
1

Can you name a single instance of that happening? A reaction that extreme when such a thing has happened to female victims? Because I've personally been aware of dozens of cases, and I've never noticed a lot of mainstream attention on any of them.
/r/MensRights28/09/19 04:03 AM
-1

They've gone to far this time. Not far enough. As a member of a military family, this enrages me. lol die mad, bitch My family was put through the Hell of thinking we may lose someone everyday of our lives. Strange that you would use the passive voice in that sentence. Your family wasn't 'put through' hell by some unseen force. It was that 'someone' who chose to put you all through hell by joining a volunteer army. You thank soldiers, God damn it! If you're a bootlicking little cunt, yeah. Get f…
/r/MensRights17/09/19 02:39 PM
1

Nice non sequitur
/r/MensRights11/09/19 11:44 PM
-1

Looking at a broad sample of the content most representative of the group's general opinion is cherry-picking, you reckon? K there bud. Edit: out of 50 top-level comments, 7 of them mention some level of suspicion or belief that this is a fake. Lol.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 11:39 PM
-1

When I came by, the top 10 or more comments were variations of "wimmuns BAD an femunissums BAD"
/r/MensRights11/09/19 11:26 PM
2

Imagine not recognizing a false flag this glaringly obvious. I feel bad for the rubes in this subreddit.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 08:06 PM
-3

It's actually partly due to Reddit shutting down far right-wing subreddits. These guys are all members of a shit-ton of the same kinds of groups. The more extreme ones, like incel, blackpill, etc, occupy most of their time and attention, and represent the majority of their time, because only there can they entertain in the most extreme of viewpoints completely openly. When those subreddits get banned, they start spending more time on the heretofore less radical subreddits.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 05:51 AM
-6

Yes, he does. He's probably serious, and look how many people agree with him. It's so absurd you'd assume it was satirical in intent if you saw it anywhere but here.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 02:16 AM
9

When were any of these acts described as stemming from "toxic masculinity"?
/r/MensRights24/08/19 02:15 AM
1

The US women's team brings in more money than the men's team, but the players are paid less. That's what this debate is about. Not the current state of professional soccer in general.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 05:59 PM
0

The US women's soccer team makes more money than the men's team, though.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 05:58 PM
-2

You should be able to name one, then, right? I'm not interested in the kind of anecdotal evidence I'd be able to collect by, as you suggest, asking a feminist. I'm more interested in the broad basis of data on which you predicated your categorical claim as to the general view of this issue within the context of the movement itself. Anyway, "liberating women" isn't what you said. What you said was "liberating women (from their own choices)". That's the part that made me super curious about the bo…
/r/MensRights05/05/19 07:40 PM
-1

You're aware that the title is an editorialization which reflects only the OP's opinion, and doesn't represent any number of feminist writers, right?
/r/MensRights05/05/19 01:32 PM
2

The feminist theory is that by liberating women (from their own choices), men will be helped because more women will be in positions of power to help men. Yikes. Which leading feminist theorist said that?? You're obvious well-read in feminist theory and will be able to point me to at least a few of the majority of feminists who espouse these views.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 01:29 PM
0

They didn't have a ready response for your bad-faith question about an industry so tiny as to be totally irrelevant, eh? Oh, the hypocrisy!
/r/MensRights05/05/19 01:28 PM
1

A pay gap feminists have no issues with Source?
/r/MensRights05/05/19 01:27 PM
3

Poor little tyke. He was so stoked to see his dad at the beginning, too.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 07:36 AM
1

Yikes, really? Do you have a link to the other story you mentioned? That sounds super harsh.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 06:52 PM
0

No, it was sincere. I didn't see anything wrong with it, myself.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 04:11 AM
1

Masculinity is being male. If some things are out dated or need changing why would we label the whole thing toxic when there is so much good. We're not labelling the whole thing toxic. We're labeling the toxic bits toxic, hence 'toxic masculinity'. This is why I still don't think you really get how adjectives work. The adjective in this case serves to name a subset of the noun it modifies. Like... does the phrase 'tall men' somehow imply that all men are tall? Certainly not. It names a subset of…
/r/MensRights22/01/19 05:30 AM
0

I've never seen a feminist advocate men stop dying to protect women. Some gender roles they're just fine with. You don't know shit about feminism beyond what Jordan Peterson tells you to think
/r/MensRights22/01/19 05:28 AM
-4

Who's talking about political parties?
/r/MensRights22/01/19 05:26 AM
0

What ad are you talking about?
/r/MensRights22/01/19 05:23 AM
2

Oh, the ad is inteded for men, sure. "Target" seemed to have negative connotations the way you were using it.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 12:54 AM
-1

It's not targeting men.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 12:47 AM
-6

What a cop out.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 12:46 AM
3

Do you not know how adjectives work or something? I just want to know how basic we need to get, here. The question you're asking is equivalent to, "What is 'Nazi Germany' if not stating that all Germans are Nazis?" What is "fruit salad" if not stating that all salads are made of fruit? What is "award-winning documentary" if not stating that all documentaries win awards? It's just not a sensible interpretation. It's not how the language works.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 12:39 AM
-1

What an utter lie.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 12:26 AM
-1

Ah, a simple misunderstanding. Good. "Toxic masculinity" doesn't mean that all masculine traits are negative, nor that the state of being a man is. No such suggestion was made. Not even remotely. I'm glad I was able to clear that up for you!
/r/MensRights22/01/19 12:18 AM
-2

It seems like you're still not understanding what is meant by the phrase 'toxic masculinity'. What do you think that phrase means?
/r/MensRights22/01/19 12:16 AM
2

One of us did
/r/MensRights22/01/19 12:15 AM
-1

Have you read a lot of feminist theory?
/r/MensRights21/01/19 11:02 PM
0

I had to scroll down pretty far to start seeing rational responses to OP's childish drivel.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 10:59 PM
-4

No, the childish posts, logical fallacies, and crappy memes are definitely a big part of it.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 10:58 PM
0

Why the /s? That's exactly correct. It's partly that, and partly the stress that men experience when they fail to live up to those standards.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 10:57 PM
3

These aren't examples of toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 10:56 PM
-11

Destroying muh private property to own the libs
/r/MensRights21/01/19 10:51 PM
-13

Not all men. The ad explicitly mentions toxic masculinity. Do you disagree that there are some men whose subjective understanding of masculinity leads them to behave in ways that cause objectively negative outcomes for themselves and others?
/r/MensRights21/01/19 10:50 PM
-14

Isn't that merely synonymous with "toxic attitudes toward men"? I asked for examples.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 10:26 PM
0

Talk about virtue signalling, wow. I'm amazing you're all falling it for it so completely.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 10:21 PM
-10

Of course they did. You don't make money off disillusioned rubes by sitting around doing nothing.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 10:21 PM
-16

What were the toxic attitudes in the Gillette ad?
/r/MensRights21/01/19 10:20 PM
-36

Talk about virtue signalling. It's funny how you rubes were up in arms because Gillette pandered to someone other than you, but as soon as someone panders to you, you're blind to the cynical nature of it.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 10:18 PM
4

What exactly about this video rubbed you the wrong way, OP? I watched it, but didn't notice them denying any of the good stuff you mentioned.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 04:41 AM
1

That's fine. Don't tell me the actual story. We both know it'll make you look like a buffoon and give the lie to your absurd explanation.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 12:23 AM
1

I'm sure that's exactly what happened, and you're not oversimplifying anything for the sake of condensing it into a pithy little "poor oppressed white man" argument. Because "standing up for men's rights" is a crime on the books in Canada, for which one's civil rights can be "stripped".
/r/MensRights07/01/19 04:12 PM
0

White men could have easily prevented eg blacks from achieving equal rights if they were the psychopathic privileged caricatures of feminist lore. Who'd hitherto been preventing them from achieving their rights? Hundreds of thousands of white men fought and died during the civil war. Not because they had any great love for the blacks. White men were imprisoned and lynched standing up for black rights during and after reconstruction. How many? A number low enough to be statistical noise. The whit…
/r/MensRights07/01/19 07:14 AM
0

I'm happy to hear that you're a passionate activist who organizes rallies to address this. I wish more people would stand up to protest injustice in danger of their very lives, just like the women who fought to earn the right to vote.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 04:16 AM
0

Do you honestly not see why it is significant that women, and particularly women of colour, are being elected to positions like this at a higher rate than the historical norm? Like, really honestly? Or are you just playing extremely dumb to own the libs?
/r/MensRights07/01/19 03:50 AM
0

By other men, though, in the overwhelming majority of cases.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 03:48 AM
5

If it weren't for white men then women, gays and "people of color" wouldn't have had to wait so long for rights in the west. I mean... you do know they had to fight for those rights, right?
/r/MensRights07/01/19 03:47 AM
0

Most of these (the originals, I mean) reinforce repressive traditional gender roles. That's why they seem especially jarring when you reverse the genders. Glad to know you're a feminist too, OP. Thanks for fighting the good fight.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 08:13 AM
0

I mean I don't give a fuck how my comment is interpreted by the basement dwelling incels of this toxic subreddit.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 09:54 PM
0

I don't give a fuck lmao
/r/MensRights27/12/18 07:19 PM
-5

95% of the users of this subreddit have a completely unrealistic understanding of the world outside their parents' basements. "If it were serious enough they would have gone straight to the cops, therefore their claims were false" is a totally legitimate line of reasoning in their stunted little minds.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 03:29 PM
-1

lmao it's a fucking law firm. But you're probably right, and you know more about labour law than they do.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 03:26 PM
-7

He was probably totally innocent. It's the 100% normal reaction of a totally innocent person to kill himself after merely hearing about mere allegations, right, guys?
/r/MensRights27/12/18 03:24 PM
11

So you're saying that there may be more to this than a short list of mostly irrelevant factoids??
/r/MensRights13/12/18 03:31 PM
26

Are combat vets supposed to get special consideration or something? Anyway, if he's been paying child support for 8 years then, by his timeline, he was away on TOD for part of that. Obviously mom gets full custody if dad is a soldier on active duty. He comes back disabled, so it kind of does make sense that mom retains custody.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 02:13 PM
3

I think I might screencap this and post it in the wikipedia article for 'Slippery Slope fallacy'. My god, man.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 11:06 PM
4

A bit of a simplification for the sake of making a short comment doesn't indicate that I "lack any real understanding of the world around" me, nor does it have any relevance to this conversation. Pure ad hominem bullshit. edit: you're a frequent poster in T_D. lmao. Imagine living in that glass house and throwing stones.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 06:45 PM
1

You mean, the only accurate definition comes from the feminist propaganda machine No, that's not where I get my information, and that's not what I'm saying. So that means the only accurate description of Hillary Clinton comes from Hillary Clinton herself. That doesn't even follow logically from the untrue summary you made of my comments. Because in your special world, lies and deception must not exist!!! What in Christ's name are you talking about?
/r/MensRights05/11/18 05:46 PM
0

the modern Feminist platform Point me to it, please.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 05:44 PM
-3

No, certainly not.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 04:20 PM
3

Why? That doesn't seem like it would be relevant to what we're discussing.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 04:20 PM
-5

A definition is as close as your nearest dictionary, friend. And I actually didn't claim to be an expert.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 04:05 PM
0

It's one of feminism's most ancient targets. The fact that the overwhelming majority of this subreddit's users immediately assumed it came from a feminist is yet another proof that almost none of them know what 'feminism' is. Like, haven't even perused the wikipedia article.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 03:27 PM
2

Well, I think it’s probably coming from someone who probably likes the ideas of “women empowerment” or “girls rule the world” or “the future is female” but also don’t want any responsibility or blame and want to be taken care of. You think that because it conforms to your world view. There is absolutely no evidence of "someone who probably likes the ideas of 'women empowerment' or 'girls rule the world' or 'the future is female'".
/r/MensRights05/11/18 03:26 PM
-6

If you think the sentiment expressed in the facebook post represents feminism, you do not know what feminism is. edit: the facebook post is promoting traditionalist gender roles and advocating stripping women of agency and responsibility. Those are the oldest targets of feminism, folks.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 03:25 PM
1

The only feminist I see is OP, for raising his voice against this rank sexism. The facebook post reflects one of the very earliest targets of feminism - the notion that women are weak and incapable of self-governance. Before the term 'feminism' even existed, forebears to the movement were fighting against exactly that brand of sexism. To think that a feminist would ever unironically make a statement like the one in that facebook post suggests that you do not understand what feminism is.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 03:23 PM
3

The sentiment expressed by the original facebook post is a holdover of traditional gender roles, in which women have been presumed to be mentally weak and inferior, incapable of governing themselves. I'm glad you support feminism, OP!
/r/MensRights05/11/18 03:19 PM
1

What? Did you respond to the wrong comment or somethinf?
/r/MensRights18/10/18 05:24 PM
-8

The guy above me was espousing relativist claptrap, so I responded with a pretty rudimentary reductio ad absurdum. I'm not the least bit surprised that the mouth-breathing cretins of /r/MensRights didn't take kindly to it.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 01:12 PM
-27

Yeah, man. Relativism explains all this stuff away so easily. It was a different culture, so we need to respect that fact and judge them according to their own standards rather than by our own. That's why I support radical Islamists. Judged by their own standards, they're excellent people.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 04:28 AM
1

All women should be believed immediately they say. I haven't heard anyone say "immediately". Who's "they"?
/r/MensRights10/10/18 03:46 AM
13

That's only surprising if you spend more time reading horror stories about muh ebil femunazis on /r/MensRights than actually talking to feminists in real life.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 02:20 PM
2

Nope. Just pointing out that he's not a dependable authority. His statement is a mere opinion anyway, meaning it does not warrant a thoroughgoing rebuttal.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 03:02 AM
-5

Noted misogynist, kidnapper and wife-beater Sean Penn says the spirit of an anti-abuse campaign is to divide men and women? I know a relevant authority when I see one!
/r/MensRights17/09/18 10:46 PM
1

Wow this is very men's rightsy. Great post.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 05:58 AM
5

Feminism since the beginning and especially in modernity, has based itself heavily on the works of Karl Marx (aka the father of communism) and his principles can be seen most prominently today in "intersectionality" , a marxist premise that creates a dichotomy of "oppressor/victim" in whch reality is filtered through a pure collectivist lens. A lot of words were used; statistically, some of them should be correct, but no.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 06:18 AM
4

It doesn't count as a double standard if one of the situations is hypothetical and exists only in your imagination. Sorry.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 05:06 AM
7

I once hired a man to break into my hotel room and sexually assault my wife hahahahahaha Oh wait no see that looks patently fucked up What the fuck
/r/MensRights04/06/18 12:47 AM
5

That's why you're not a journalist, I guess. That's heavily editorialised.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 03:39 AM
1

Been subscribed for like 5 years, bud.
/r/MensRights28/04/18 08:08 PM
-3

Your shipment of Male Approval is in the mail!
/r/MensRights28/04/18 03:38 AM
-11

Tell me, how does this poster “denigrate the accomplishments” of women? I never said that. Go back and re-read. This poster doesn’t mention women at all Exactly! Go back and re-read what I actually said. 😉 Of course women contribute to society and are just as valuable as men are. Nothing about this poster says otherwise. I mean it literally says "Everything you see was built by men" though? Lol did you actually read the OP or my whole statement? Everything you say lends further credence to my be…
/r/MensRights09/02/18 09:16 PM
-12

Yes. Or you could find one yourself, if you seriously doubt that it's true, which you don't, you disingenuous cunt.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 04:12 PM
18

wow fuck feminism! why do they always have to view everything as a zero-sum game? you don't have to denigrate the accomplishments of men in order to honour the accomplishments of women!!! lmao here enjoy this substantively false meme which ignores the contributions of women in order to focus on the contributions of men nice job as usual /r/mensrights
/r/MensRights09/02/18 04:11 PM
0

No, rape is generally considered to be forced intercourse. The way I see it, the perpetrator has to be seeking sexual gratification or else it isn't really rape.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 04:54 PM
0

No, "rape" is usually reserved for forced intercourse. I feel that the perpetrator has to be seeking immediate sexual gratification in order for the act to be considered rape. Like that university kid who got done for fingering that girl, whoever that was. I don't agree with calling him a rapist either.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 04:53 PM
2

A lot of r/incel users started posting here after their hive got shut down. Simple fact.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 04:52 PM
1

I guess I was going by a commonsense definition of "rape" as forced sexual intercourse.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 04:50 PM
1

My understanding is that that's not the case.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 04:49 PM
-17

Sure. Also, she didn't actually rape the guy. She sodomised him with a foreign object. Someone who actually committed rape, I would always suspect could be capable of doing so again (barring extreme measures like castration, of course.) But in this case, I would guess recidivism to be unlikely.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 08:22 AM
-12

He wasn't homosexual. She said she thought he was because of the way he reacted when she shoved a bar in his ass. That being said, for the sake of playing devil's advocate, I say she's served her time. She admitted her guilt, did 27 years in prison, and now she's out. If the purpose of incarceration is rehabilitation, shouldn't we accept that she's carried out the mandated period of punishment and paid her dues, and let her get on with life? Edit: I explicitly said I was merely offering a counte…
/r/MensRights29/01/18 05:48 AM
-3

It's nice that you little snowflakes always like to identify yourselves like that
/r/MensRights29/01/18 05:39 AM
-7

This sub was bad to begin with, but ever since it took on that raft of refugees from r/incel it's been an absolute mess
/r/MensRights29/01/18 04:37 AM
2

....he says, bitching about something trivial on the internet rather than fucking doing something
/r/MensRights29/01/18 04:35 AM
-6

You forgot to throw in a canard about "muh cultural marxism"
/r/MensRights06/01/18 11:29 AM
1

No. As a response it makes no sense. It's a non sequitur.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 07:15 PM
1

Your response doesn't make a lick of sense.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 03:49 PM
2

Do you actually know that she didn't ask?
/r/MensRights31/10/17 02:51 AM
-18

This is /r/MensRights. Things don't have to make sense
/r/MensRights31/10/17 02:50 AM
1

This is the same kind of gender gap as the gender wage gap - i.e. not a gap at all. You've compared apples and oranges, here. At least find a sentencing disparity between convictions for the same crime, man.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 04:56 AM
2

Lol Queen Victoria oppressed half the world's landmass without ever declaring war, apparently! It's a miracle!
/r/MensRights15/09/17 02:05 PM
2

Judge Judy has always been based as fuck.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 04:44 PM
2

My opinion is correct. As proof, here's an opinion article written by someone who shares my opinion.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 05:27 AM
1

implying there wasn't outrage regardless of content over "Dear White People"
/r/MensRights07/05/17 09:41 PM
1

Christ. Learn to fucking write.
/r/MensRights01/05/17 04:59 PM
-4

"I am a kissless virgin and women won't even look at me."
/r/MensRights30/04/17 03:09 PM
7

That's why they make sure judges don't have any personal connection to cases they handle. It's called a "conflict of interests". Like are you fucking joking? Emotional investment in a case would produce a better judgment, you think? Christ almighty.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 03:08 PM
-7

What a misleading title On /r/MensRights???? It is impossible to determine if the sentence was merited based on an extremely brief internet summary. A woman got what sort of looks like maybe a bit of a light sentence. That's enough evidence for me to know that systemic misandry is a real thing. Is that how we really want the justice system to work? A snap judgement based on a single sentence of text on the internet? Yes! Unless it's a man and he's been accused by a woman, in which case only time…
/r/MensRights30/04/17 03:07 PM
2

The judge said there was not enough evidence to prove this was intentional. But you know better because you saw some stuff on the internet. ;)
/r/MensRights30/04/17 03:03 PM
-7

Because he's a man. Also, the judge said something that hurt OP's feelings. I am sort of surprised, but sort of not, that this subreddit has literally degenerated to white-knighting for convicted child rapists.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 06:50 PM
2

How did feminism enter into the discussion? What a non sequitur.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 11:41 AM
1

/r/MensRights in a nutshell, this comment right here. The mods should be ashamed of themselves for letting this turn into yet another alt-right haven for redpilled edgy trolls.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 03:03 AM
-15

On June 3, 1968, she went to The Factory, where she found Warhol. She shot at Warhol three times, with the first two shots missing and the final wounding Warhol. She also shot art critic Mario Amaya, and attempted to shoot Warhol's manager, Fred Hughes, point blank, but the gun jammed. Solanas then turned herself in to the police. She was charged with attempted murder, assault, and illegal possession of a gun. She was diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia and pleaded guilty to "reckless assault …
/r/MensRights10/03/17 02:21 AM
1

Why do you think I'm anti-men's rights? "This guy doesn't agree with me 100% on this issue, therefore he must disagree with me 100% on every issue"? That kind of binary thinking will get you nowhere, bud.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 03:17 AM
1

Who's "we"?
/r/MensRights15/02/17 01:08 AM
1

What I said was perfectly sensible. I'll dumb it down for you if you honestly can't understand. In any of the cases you mentioned, if a person were to make a photo collage such as OP's using only male examples, that choice would be easily explanable by the statistical prevalences you mention without the need to imagine any bigotry on the part of the collage's creator.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 12:21 AM
0

Those would all be perfectly reasonable explanations for why someone's photographic example of one of those things happens to be a man, just as my statement was an explanation of why OP's post was not inaccurate to include only women.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 09:50 PM
-3

Yeah, surrogate births for gay couples are just as common as any other! Because fuck statistics! Let'salso forget about the fact that, worldwide, women are stil far far far more likely to have the majority responsibility of childcare within the family unit and that many men choose not to be present for the act of childbirth.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 09:17 PM
6

Awww babby's first stock analysis
/r/MensRights07/02/17 02:26 PM
1

Good. If they hadn't included aboriginal men in the investigation they'd never have discovered who was behind all the disappeared aboriginal women.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 07:05 AM
2

If you're deliberately trying to misunderstand what someone says, anything could sound contradictory.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 02:57 PM
-30

It's a sad day when our judiciary is no longer independent lol who were the people who recommended the judge's dismissal? Perhaps we should just post news articles about "sexual assault" and "domestic violence" victims online and let feminist redditors and beta males determine their guilt without reference to actual facts or testimony. lol replace the baseless pejoratives you used with ones that could be applied to users of this subreddit (spoiler: 'beta males' still works) and let the overwhelm…
/r/MensRights01/12/16 02:35 PM
-8

Committee composed of experts in Canadian judicial ethics: this judge needs to go Some random fuck on reddit: FEMINISM IS DESTROYING OUR SOCIETY
/r/MensRights01/12/16 02:33 PM
-10

This title is as inflammatory and misleading as it gets. In /r/MensRights?????? SAY IT AIN'T SO
/r/MensRights01/12/16 02:29 PM
1

This was highschool. And are you fucking serious? Do you seriously fucking believe that in no college campus in the world could you find students and teachers engaging in a calm and rational discussion of ideas?
/r/MensRights01/11/16 02:49 PM
1

I already explained my comment in a reply to another reply. OP's calling the boy "brave" and saying the teacher was "displeased" were pretty obvious attempts to play him up as the victim of teh ebil cultural marxists. Incidentally, I'm not a feminist, although that's immaterial to my criticism of the tone of this post. You anti-feminists really like projecting, don't you.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 02:20 PM
1

I didn't say the kid in the video was playing the victim. I put the name of the subreddit in my sarcastic post for a reason - to imply that OP was seeking an excuse to claim victimhood. To watch the video, there's nothing to make an impartial viewer believe either of the emotional appeals the OP includes in his title - either that the kid was brave, or that the teacher was upset. It's pretty obvious that he was giving a prepared presentation on a controversial topic and that the teacher was aski…
/r/MensRights01/11/16 01:12 AM
1

To Do Today: /r/MensRights Edition Decry SJW tumblrina feminazis for playing the victim card Play the victim card
/r/MensRights31/10/16 11:39 PM
1

So then yes, aside from naturally occurring threats, as I said, men are the greatest threat.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 12:41 PM
0

So women are a greater threat to other women than men are?
/r/MensRights21/10/16 12:31 PM
0

Sorry, is this factually incorrect? Aside from communicable disease and other naturally occurring factors, of course.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 09:18 AM
1

Because it's a chart of the concepts represented by Yin and Yang.
/r/MensRights18/10/16 06:54 AM
1

If you have exceptional academic merit you will have no difficulty finding money. Those identity-based scholarships are small money and they're focused on - get this - identity and not academics. Exceptional academic merit can always bring in scholarships.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 06:43 PM
-17

If women make up 60% of the student body then surely we should see a majority of scholarships going to women...?
/r/MensRights14/10/16 06:39 PM
1

That's not how the legal system works. Courts don't say A didn't rape B. They decide that B has not presented sufficient evidence for them to state with absolute certainty that A did. Verdicts come back 'not guilty', not 'innocent'. That's an enormous fucking difference, m8. Take OJ Simpson. The court declared that they could not convict him, but he definitely fucking did it. He doesn't eve seriously deny it. Take Jian Ghomeshi! He never even denied that he did what he was accused of! And that's…
/r/MensRights09/10/16 10:54 AM
0

I'm a gril btw ;)
/r/MensRights05/10/16 02:50 PM
2

ageofshitlords.com Yeah great source. The irony here is that he's actually talking about developing countries, and focusing on comparatively trivial first-world problems to the detriment of international 'real issues' is one of the biggest criticisms the alt-right likes to pretend to care about when they attack feminism. Christ, people.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 12:15 PM
-4

silence a victim of sexual assault by asking for sources Lol go fuck yourself. That rhetorical bullshit doesn't fly when feminists trot it out and it doesn't fly now.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 12:26 AM
-7

So wait, unsubstantiated factual claims are admissible because the argument is emotional and not rational? Get the fuck out of here. Far from somehow excusing a lack of rigour, making an appeal to emotion is in and of itself fallacious. Also comma you're making a point about victim statistics, not perpetrator statistics. The number of male victims could be equal to the number of female victims, which I don't doubt for a moment, but that doesn't imply that the number of female perpetrators is any…
/r/MensRights25/08/16 11:32 PM
1

for every male pedophile there is a female pedophile, for every male rapist there is a female rapist. Factual claims require evidence. I can simply say "No there aren't" and the whole thing falls apart in the absence of substantiating evidence. Just a heads up.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 11:08 PM
4

Sorry, where in the article are her actions excused on those grounds?
/r/MensRights14/08/16 05:32 PM
-18

Breitbart published something untrue to further their "White Men Are Literally The Most Oppressed Group Rite Now U Guise" narrative?!? SAY IT AIN'T SO
/r/MensRights19/07/16 02:36 PM
-1

we lol what have you built?
/r/MensRights10/07/16 11:48 PM
-2

I don't get to tell them what moments they choose to share? Don't you mean, "what moments they get to share"? I didn't tell anyone what moments they get to share. I expressed my opinion over here on reddit in the full confidence that this woman would never read it. I'll do that whenever I feel like it, fuckface.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 12:00 PM
1

She got a 3-year jail sentence. Like, yeah, lol, hilarious male privilege maymay and everything, but it's misdirected in this case. inb4 "if she wuz male she wudv goten a longer sentance tho so its stil discriminashun"
/r/MensRights21/05/16 05:40 AM
-3

Yeah. It's not like they're just sharing a sweet moment or whatever. My daughter had some stomach bug that gave her a high fever and made her vomit a lot. A lot. We were one vomit away from taking her to emerg because she couldn't even keep water down and she was going to be dehydrated. Nothing beautiful about a mortal fear for your child's wellbeing, especially when you know that if it was just 50 years ago, or for that matter today in any of about 160 countries, your kid would very likely be d…
/r/MensRights21/05/16 05:38 AM
1

Those guys were attacking. Shoulda put up a pic of harried Nazis in their bunkers.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 05:22 AM
4

I'm not saying it's incorrect, I'm saying the form their argument takes is akin to a playground yelling match of "IS NOT! / IS TOO!"
/r/MensRights27/02/16 05:13 AM
5

They say: a wage gap exists. What they leave out: THERE IS NO WAGE GAP. Very convincing, wow.
/r/MensRights27/02/16 01:47 AM
0

Man, the base, disposable unit, has no function; man earns status by assuming a particular function for the group. Utter bullshit Words do change. You're right. Man perhaps used to be the base unit, or anyway was the gender neutral term. Now it just means adult male human. Not a politically charged word except for cunts like you who insist on weaving these fanciful narratives based wholly outside of any factual historical context. Your writing style sucks, too. What is this fluff? ... many thing…
/r/MensRights31/08/15 11:13 PM
-7

Revisionist poppycock. As everyone else has already said, THERE IS NO FUCKING IMPORTANCE IN THE MEANING OF THESE FUCKING WORDS.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 04:09 PM
1

The first two appear to be saying that the phrase 'men's rights' resembles the phrase 'white power', i.e. that they're both groups who traditionally do have the upper hand, and so to co-opt the verbiage of minority rights' movements is a commonality. The last two are examples of self-described MRAs being openly racist. Nothing closeted about that. Especially that Black Women article dude. Jesus.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 04:10 PM
1

I've never seen that. Not once. I frequently see people claiming that it's just misogyny masquerading as a men-focused movement, but I've never seen allegations of it being, as you quote, a "closet white pride group". Can you give me the source on that quote, or any of the other times that this 'always' happens?
/r/MensRights13/07/15 03:49 PM
3

You reckon the 'mainstream' is going to use non sequitur racial comments on this subreddit to discredit MRAs as a group?
/r/MensRights13/07/15 02:12 PM
11

tbh its literally called intersectionality smh
/r/MensRights13/07/15 12:18 PM
92

What world do you live in? How could a persyn of colyr possibly rape a white oppressor?
/r/MensRights13/07/15 04:49 AM
-6

This isn't censorship. It's the free publication choices of a single company. Censorship would be, like, the President of the USA commanding that all websites ban Fate Hate-themed discussions.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 08:10 AM
1

Why do you think this subreddit is in danger of being banned?
/r/MensRights12/06/15 07:55 AM
-2

Become the CEO then. Or create a better platform. Get out of Mom's basement, learn a skill, and stop using a website you apparently hate to complain about that same website. "It should be mother fucker!" accomplished the same real-world effects as taking a piss. Maybe even less.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 07:54 AM
3

Haha, because video games are a really intellectual content area. How shameful that the video game content should have given way to other content. Gone are the true intellectuals.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 07:48 AM
1

Have you actually followed that link about "Harvard"? The top comments expose that Harvard med. was not actually involved. It may have been taken down because it was factually erroneous clickbait.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 07:46 AM
-6

He was on TV as a member of a public corporation, which means that he was representing them for that brief period of time. In all likelihood his contract included a clause explicitly requiring him not to undertake any actions that would reflect poorly on the reputation of the company. If he'd been drinking on a patio and shouted the phrase at a passerby, there's no way he would have been fired; but this? I'd fire his ass, too. Sharon Osbourne, on the other hand, wasn't representing a public corp…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 06:37 AM
1

You're a fucking human male. You're powerful, and intelligent. Carnal and passionate, but civilized. Dude. Bro. Jesus fucking Christ.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 05:34 PM
2

Everyone knows Kevin Costner has always been the primary victim of war.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 12:48 PM
0

Yeah, you're right. Courts have literally never ruled for a man against a woman before.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 04:03 AM
2

That might have been the case, back in the day. It's nice that there's been progress in that area; if only we could get progress in these other areas any day now.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 03:59 AM
9

"The action of unilaterally cutting off talks with an advocating student, particularly when steps were being made towards a compromise that could respect all parties’ needs and concerns, is an affront to the right of students to engage with and be treated with respect by their university," said Stewart-Kanigan. Huh. So my whites-only bathroom idea might still be considered?
/r/MensRights22/03/15 08:48 AM
4

They have more than 1 swimming pool. Offering women-only hours at one of them doesn't result in any amount of time when only women have access to any swimming facilities and all men are excluded. I understand that the issue with the gym is that it would have resulted in there being times when men were wholly prevented from using the facilities, having no secondary facilities to accomodate them. I don't see a big problem with the swimming thing, to be honest.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 08:47 AM
5

Pedophilia is sexual conduct with a prepubescent child. Nope. Pedophilia just refers to the attraction.
/r/MensRights21/02/15 06:20 AM
-3

The girl texted pictures of herself, the boys disseminated video of them having sex with her. How is that the same thing.
/r/MensRights21/02/15 06:18 AM
2

the woman reproductive system is what creates life not a penis. I thought you needed both. The 19-year-olds filmed themselves fucking someone they knew was underage, then spread the footage around. In what universe in that acceptable?
/r/MensRights21/02/15 06:17 AM
-1

As a man, I love rape and think about it constantly while not actually engaged in it.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 10:02 PM
1

Men are the minority in university, but they aren't yet marginalised enough. We need to make sure that they have all the negative experiences of being a minority that we pretend we want to eliminate.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 05:32 AM
1

We'd be more likely to evolve big meaty alien-fist-defeating faces.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 07:50 AM
4

... I was never that feminist girl demanding equality, but maybe that's because I've never really faced inequality. That's the thing.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 07:40 AM
1

I can see how you got that impression, yes. On the books, women are as culpable as men for drug offenses. If you combed through the jails looking at incarcerated drug offenders, however, I have a very strong suspicion which gender you'd see more often.
/r/MensRights26/12/14 02:27 PM
1

Exactly. White men included. The person who said the thing I quoted seemed to be implying that white men, unlike women or POC, are free from any constraints on the free use of their own persons. There are numerous counter examples, among which are the two I named.
/r/MensRights26/12/14 02:14 PM
1

They've never had regulations put on their body ahem drug laws ahem selective service ahem
/r/MensRights26/12/14 08:35 AM
5

None of those conversations was private. Facebook is not private. They didn't name the group 'gentlemen's club'. They named it after their program and school. They're dentistry students (i.e. people who one day hope to be entrusted with the care of sedated patients) making rape jokes about sedatives. Come on. Jesus. I'd expel them too.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 06:39 PM
2

but this whole doublespeak political correctness thing is decidedly Progressive. Uh, right. Like how President Bush and co. named their anticonstitutional civilian spying act the USAPATRIOT act? Or how the phrase 'shell shock' was gradually renamed 'PTSD' to disassociate it from its most common cause - soldiery? Or any one of a billion examples of linguistic manipulation toward conservative goals? Political correctness I can easily grant is a lefty invention, but intentionally deceptive euphemis…
/r/MensRights17/12/14 02:50 PM
2

It's being made out as though it's been feminists at the centre of this minimilisation of male importance, and I was merely pointing out that this is very surely not the case.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 02:46 PM
2

Good rejoinder.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 02:44 PM
0

Well, from a reproductive standpoint, men definitely are the disposable sex. It takes 9 months for a woman to do her bit in bringing another human into being, and until quite recently (and even still today, in much of the world) she had a fair chance of dying or becoming unable to reproduce further, and even the best outcome meant a few months' down time before being in the condition to conceive again. A single male, on the other hand, could theoretically contribute his little chromosome halves …
/r/MensRights17/12/14 01:01 PM
2

To the leftist, narrative is king. It's very clever in all honesty. Says the guys using ists and isms to draw lines where none exist. "Narrative is king" to everyone interested in having their worldview propagated. You included, clearly.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 12:46 PM
-1

invent literally every component of the modern world including the democracy and freedoms of speech that allow everyone else to curse your existence
/r/MensRights15/12/14 09:24 AM
1

Where's the part about Lena Dunham? I don't see it anywhere.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 06:06 PM
1

Since I am wont to include abortions in there Why would you do that? That's beyond the scope of the original argument.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 11:50 PM
-6

That last one was a joke, chief.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 02:42 PM
-6

Facts? You need to TW this shit. I'm so triggered right now.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 02:34 PM
2

The parent comment of this idiotic thread made a very clear factual claim: "A greater percentage of women have killed their own children than men have gone on a shooting rampage." No "I bet"s, no "probably"s, just an outright factual claim. Someone asked for a source, which is absolutely fair. Nobody has provided one. Cynically responding that 'life' itself is a source is astoundingly stupid. That doesn't fit the definition of what a source is, you fool.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 01:37 PM
6

So... no source, then?
/r/MensRights25/10/14 01:29 PM
7

So... no source, then?
/r/MensRights25/10/14 11:41 AM
-4

If Warren Farrell said precisely these words you'd all be applauding him.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 11:37 AM
1

Ah, righteous indignation: the last resort of someone who has no real argument upon which to depend. I love it. It's like saying "You win but I can't admit it".
/r/MensRights04/10/14 10:49 AM
-5

OP is a piece of shit. Look at his comments around this thread.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 04:27 AM
1

Judging by the stats on inter- and intra-racial crime, black people hate black people more than any other group hates any other group.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 04:26 AM
4

Do you actually not know about selective service? How can you continue to be so ignorant in this discussion? You've had several opportunities to educate yourself, but comment after comment reveals that you are still ignorant of the fundamental fact around which the discussion revolves. How can this be? It makes no sense. The machine you're using to type has the power to reveal the missing information to you. Why do you not use it?
/r/MensRights04/10/14 04:24 AM
1

Considering that most rapes are perpetrated by someone previously known to the victim, and that most female victims have male assailants, what measures do you propose women take to avoid becoming victims? Simply to distrust all men? Because a prejudiced mistrust of all men is really the only thing that could offer a modicum of protection against "any man you already know". Yet when a woman exhibits this mistrust, she gets picked on again for hating all men. You can't have it both ways, pal.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 04:16 AM
2

Disgusting.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 12:38 PM
-1

Nonsense. Cite a source.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 04:32 AM
3

Shush. No logic here, only feels.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 06:59 AM
5

[citation needed]
/r/MensRights05/06/14 06:58 AM
4

She was the first female aviator to fly solo across the Atlantic, though.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 06:56 AM
1

The "Grubby hands" article is actually about what she perceives as a widespread problem in society, namely that when men make use of workplace sexual discrimination laws for their own benefit, many people's first reaction is akin to the one typified by the headline of the piece, but that this is unfair since the laws exist for everyone. She admits to having had that same reaction, and states that she knows it's negative and wants to change. Most of what she writes appears to be extremely sexist …
/r/MensRights18/05/14 06:28 PM
7

Another brilliant article by this woman: Women in the British army fighting on the front line? Wrong move, Mr Hammond
/r/MensRights18/05/14 05:48 PM
0

I have foot fungus and would fucking love to be rid of my baby toes. Just sayin'.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 01:46 PM
-14

FGM and circumcision aren't even comparable, though. Circumcision is a procedure with recorded health benefits, and is not performed with the sole intent of impairing sexual function. FGM is a procedure with no recorded health benefits, and is performed solely in order to impair sexual function. The two procedures are simply not analogous.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 01:45 PM
7

>self-esteem >subjective No guff.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 01:56 AM
-17

What was the purpose of quoting that information about the study? Were you trying to prove something by pointing out that the project supervisors were both women? Why should that have any relevance? Had they both been men, would you have felt a similar impetus to challenge the validity of the results?
/r/MensRights16/03/14 01:55 AM
-2

Do you really have to ask that? Did you forget which subreddit you were on?
/r/MensRights16/03/14 01:51 AM
-3

Nice dodge. You saw a ludicrous fringe opinion that was overtly anti-man and knew that the idiots on this subreddit would upvote it. There's no justification, and the nonsense you wrote just now doesn't in any way answer the criticism it was intended to. "The unreasonableness of another's position can clarify our own"? What does that even mean? There's nothing to say to the unreasonable opinion presented in your post; it's patently ridiculous; no reasonable person feels that way. It is such a fr…
/r/MensRights16/03/14 01:49 AM
3

Yes, because everyone in mainstream society is so super-supportive of abortion.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 05:50 AM
3

Let me flip that on you: how do running, cycling or swimming make you more healthy than lifting?
/r/MensRights01/03/14 01:52 AM
0

So much ignorant, misguided swolehate. I'm guessing you went once, picked up a bar, found it heavy and disliked the muscle soreness, decided you didn't want to do it anymore, but remain intensely jealous of the gains made by men who are able to persevere in a heavy lifting program. I personally enjoy lifting weights because I like lifting heavy things. That's all there is to it. Also, to your ludicrous point about the illusory concept of "fitness", find me a marathon runner and put us in a death…
/r/MensRights01/03/14 01:50 AM
2

You want to be 170lbs at 6'1"? Jesus, man. Have some dignity.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 01:45 AM
1

vast majority Any source on that? Any at all? You're making big factual claims, here, without substantiating them even the slightest bit.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 01:44 AM
4

If your definition of '-ism' is 'systematic oppression', then it stands to reason that an underclass can't be -ist. This is just a tautological statement. My problem is that this type of Marxist definition is tacitly accepted in so many of the social "science" disciplines without being examined whatsoever. Any rational person ought to be inclined toward much deeper reflection when presented with such a clearly subjective interpretation of the issue. You can't blame the students for winding up la…
/r/MensRights19/02/14 06:19 AM
1

Oh, no. Creationists have belief; feminists of this stripe often just have ignorance. I bet there are way more former hardline feminists walking around than there are former creationists.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 01:06 AM
1

Something in the tone here, especially the last line, leads me to believe that the writer is merely pointing out what society expects from men and is in fact lamenting this case of affairs. The blunt language in particular leads me to this conclusion. Edit: welp, just read the article. What a fucking tool.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 11:03 AM
1

Common mistake, bro
/r/MensRights16/01/14 06:36 AM
2

I'm the same. As an egalitarian, there are some issues on which I have to be a feminist, others on which the MRA side seems more appropriate, and others where neither side seems to quite get it right. Also, a point of interest: 'infer' is something you do when you synthesise something you read or hear with something you already know in order to learn a fact that was not explicitly stated. 'Imply' is when you structure your writing or speech in such a way so as to allow others to infer.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 03:00 AM
1

TIL that Nazi Germany was a third-world country full of brown people.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 12:33 AM
9

You may find that most feminists come down in support of such personal choices, as well.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 12:07 AM
2

DFW feels
/r/MensRights15/12/13 11:25 AM
0

When your only contact with females is anonymous and based in internat discussion threads, it's probably easy to come to the conclusion that they're all unreasonable and get bent out of shape over jokes. The funny thing is that, just as the only women you 'know' are internet SJWs, the only men they 'know' are internet MRAs, who tend to represent the gender Man about as well as those above-mentioned feminazis represent Woman. They continue to give one another a bad impression of the opposite sex …
/r/MensRights15/12/13 11:24 AM
1

I guarantee that a shirt exists with this slogan on it. I would stake my life's savings on it.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 11:16 AM
6

It's only when it comes to sexual assault that anyone even complains about victim-blaming. If my meek white roommate, on his way out of the house at 1 a.m., told me "I'm just going to stroll through the 'hood in these brand new white hi-tops and shiny watch," I'd tell him to check his fucking head.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 02:43 PM
-2

The separation into men's and women's leagues isn't just based on talent level. If it were, "women's" leagues would be full of men as well. The level of play from professional women athletes is what you see from the second-stringers in men's junior major sports. To take the example of hockey, I would almost be willing to bet that the champion OHL team could knock a pretty handy victory out of the Canadian national women's team. It'd be more of a competition than when the women's national team pl…
/r/MensRights05/12/13 01:20 AM
2

It appears to be 'courier' font, which is standard for screenplays in North America.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 06:20 AM
15

Technically any form of unwanted physical contact is equivalent in the sense of it being a violation of personal space. Whether or not something does damage is irrelevant (as you said, you hit him partly because "as a woman, you feel that you can't do him any real harm." Clearly harm isn't the issue.) He's as much in the wrong tickling or putting his cold hands on you as you are hitting him. I'm picturing this situation in my mind and it's ludicrous. Husband: (playfully teasing) Hey honey. I was…
/r/MensRights28/11/13 02:58 AM
4

His comment didn't claim affiliation with any particular 'ism' or movement, so there's no reason to think that feminists would take issue with it. Actually, considering how neutral his comment indeed was with relation to schools of thought, it could as easily have come from a feminist as from anyone else ostensibly committed to gender equality. Take your gripes somewhere else to flog them. /r/mensrants, for example.
/r/MensRights28/11/13 02:52 AM
9

It only counts as sexist when women are maligned as a result of that same basic philosophy, not when they benefit. Get with the picture.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 05:04 AM
9

Social scientists make hypotheses about observable phenomena and then devise tests and other experiments to gauge the efficacy of those hypotheses to predict their outcomes. When a hypothesis or theory fails to predict an observed phenomenon, it is altered to allow for the result or discarded entirely in favour of new paradigms. How is that not science?
/r/MensRights03/11/13 05:03 AM
1

So this subreddit is purely just anti-feminism anything, now, yes?
/r/MensRights15/10/13 04:13 PM
1

Remember where we are right now. The last time anyone in /r/MensRights was able to take a joke was, evidently, before they joined this subreddit.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 01:17 AM
3

if this was a middle aged woman who wanted to see Justin Bieber... and yet it wasn't. While we can guess what might have happened, it didn't, so it isn't really fair to call this a 'Men's Rights' issue. It's an isolated incident with no double standard to cite.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 06:47 PM
5

what the fuck are they actually saying here with the phrase '90% of teenage fathers don't marry the mother'? Read the poster again.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 06:44 PM
38

Shhh. You might snuff out his torch.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 10:29 AM
-1

Show me evidence of that, or else it's baseless conjecture.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 11:51 PM
1

Men do that all the time. If you speak of women in any other terms in the lockerroom, frat house, construction yard, or any other place or situation in which men are surrounded only by other men and are prone to compete for 'manliest man' status, you get branded a 'faggot' and ostracised for your views. A lot of those conversations tend to rapidly take on the form of a 'who can tell the most demeaning story of sexual conquest?' contest. I once heard a fellow describe how he fucked a girl in the …
/r/MensRights21/07/13 11:49 PM
-7

MRAs frequently deny it exists despite it being a readily observed phenomenon. It's an embarrassment to the movement.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 06:07 PM
-15

There's nothing here indicating a double standard except the OP's conjecture that men doing what these women did would have been treated differently than the women were. It's fallacious.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 06:06 PM
1

Do it and record the results and then post it alongside what you have here for an actual comparison. As it stands, what you have here is women doing something, editorialised with your unsubstantiated conjecture that, had it been men performing those actions, the outcome would have been different. This kind of post is an embarrassment and a detriment to the community and the movement.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 06:04 PM
2

Nope, see, I told you what logic meant. A simple proposition doesn't have logic.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 02:48 AM
2

It's not logic, it's a statement. Logic refers to the way an argument is constructed, and this isn't an argument. And you know damn well that motherhood and fatherhood are two very different situations physically, so no, any statement about motherhood can not simply be applied to fatherhood under the disingenuous guise of 'gender equality'. Every baby that's born represents several months of at least discomfort and at times extreme pain and suffering on the part of a woman, whereas the minimum c…
/r/MensRights02/07/13 01:03 AM
-20

I was considered a misogynist, and rapist, the day I was born No you weren't, you fucking tool. EDIT: I can't believe how readily you're all slurping up this idiot's dribblings. His persecution complex and evident anti-woman1 comments represent the worst of the MRM so fully that I begin to think he/she may be a deep cover troll. 1 As distinguished from pro-man. I.e., the kind of thing you all so loudly decry when the reverse is committed by feminists.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 12:51 AM
-10

"I'll trust your claim about women because it confirms my bias, but I don't like the sound of the other one, so I'm going to ask for a source on it alone." - You
/r/MensRights02/07/13 12:49 AM
-3

I'm not sure about a lot of these sources, but throwing a bunch of quotes around out of context is not a particularly clever or valid way to discredit a school of thought. The first Dworkin quote is from a work of fiction. It's not appropriate to simply lift quotes from fictional works and attribute them directly to the author. If I write a book in which a character voices admiration for the actions of, say, Pol Pot, am I then to be discredited by my detractors' bandying the quote about?
/r/MensRights20/06/13 04:12 PM
-19

And just because I comment in threads doesn't mean I intend to say anything even remotely tangentially related to the topic in the OP.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 02:32 PM
5

That's not what 'victim-blaming' is.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 12:19 PM
2

If the patriarchy is the thing behind the social order, then men must be slaves to it as much as women are. I may be a man, but I'm no more a member of an international cabal of evil world-controllers than is Sheila Shavemenot. If we're all subject to the dictates of some oppressive power, why do women get to shirk responsibility for their actions but not men? Also, under the logic that all (penetrative) heterosexual contact is rape, it follows that actual forcible rape is not more abhorrent tha…
/r/MensRights29/05/13 01:19 AM
20

I'm pretty sure that's what OP intended to make us think.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 12:06 PM
16

A 17-year-old is not a child, and 17 is above the age of consent for these characters. And what, exactly, is so wrong with teen sex?
/r/MensRights27/05/13 12:05 PM
11

TIL it's ok to paint all women with the same brush and simultaneously to expect them not to do the same to men.
/r/MensRights26/05/13 11:56 AM
2

My presumption was that this guy was being facetious, since what he describes is exactly the kind of "I changed my mind and therefore it was rape all along" mentality so loudly decried in this subreddit, but all of his comments are similarly absurd. It might be some kind of troll account.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 01:35 AM
1

a man isn't consenting to have babies during sex. If it happens, then that sex is retroactively rape, because a woman is changing the context of it via microbiology. That is, far and away, the most ludicrous thing I've ever read on this subject. Are you actually serious?
/r/MensRights20/05/13 05:37 PM
1

They had every bit as much of a choice and yet the only choice you've granted them is the choice to have or not to have sex. I'm pretty sure they also have the choice to wear condoms.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 05:00 PM
-3

That's a very narrow understanding of reproductive rights. Most of these young fathers, I daresay, were not raped, nor did they have their semen stolen. They had every bit as much of a choice. In fact, it was my understanding that the low prevalence of condom use in most communities is due to resistance from the male, not the female, population.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 04:23 AM
13

He is. He explicitly advocates staying at home and looking after kids, which are not usually on the tip of anyone's tongue when they trot out the typical "man up" slur, which I also didn't see the President actually use here, despite OP's use of quotation marks around that phrase.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 04:21 AM
8

He's specifically delivering this address in the context of the black community, in which unwed teenage parents are shockingly common and in which the fathers, mere teenagers themselves, often feel they have better things to do than stay at home and raise babies well, as per my limited understanding of the issue.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 04:19 AM
1

Aside from the moral horror of this wretched being, the justifications she uses are of that sickening brand that others use to defend, among other things, rape, violence and theft - that somehow the concept of 'evolution' can be used to justify acting like an animal in the midst of modern society. The fact is that society exists and has done so for thousands of years, and that you are a part of it. Our ancestors (similar to modern tribal societies) likely killed each other over slight insults an…
/r/MensRights27/04/13 04:35 AM
4

It's a follow-up on the story of how the mother sold her kickstarter thing by throwing her sons under the bus and essentially painting the issue like it was a case of her sons belittling their sister and saying she'd never make it as a game designer because she was a girl. Pretty tangential, yeah.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 04:58 PM
-1

Playful touching is the same thing as consent to sexual activity.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 07:31 PM
0

That 'capes' project page made me cringe hard.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 10:24 AM
0

Those writeups on the various websites were clearly not written by any 9-year-old.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 10:18 AM
1

Maybe we should all just quit grinding our little axes in this particular case, then. When people are convicted of rape and the media treats the convicted rapists like they're the victims, it doesn't show a lot of tact to start pushing false rape-claim stats in everyone's faces.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 06:09 AM
5

Want to solve a problem? Become part of the problem!
/r/MensRights18/03/13 02:15 PM
8

This was very probably a response to the outrageous coverage of the Steubenville gang rape case.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 02:11 PM
5

Good thing you made an image instead of writing a self post. You might have missed out on all that karma.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 12:49 PM
3

You're the one who thinks all forms of socialism are shades of Marxism and you're accusing me of "binary thinking"? Funny.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 06:52 AM
1

You must be fucking joking me. I've never actually heard or seen someone say that before.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 01:21 AM
7

What the fuck does Obama have to do with the inherent qualities of enfranchisement?
/r/MensRights10/03/13 12:20 AM
6

Many of the best places to live in this world are Western states in which the principles of socialism have firmly taken root. Perhaps you meant Marxism.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 12:18 AM
-13

I am ashamed that someone who expresses herself so poorly considers herself a hero for a cause I believe in. You should contribute your poorly written claptrap to the feminist agenda instead, to discredit them.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 12:28 PM
3

In all my labour experience I earned above minimum wage.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 12:26 PM
1

It didn't inform them of anything. It was a simple, trite comment intended to appeal to the broadest base possible in an attempt to garner upvotes. Simply saying "Feminism at work" in /r/mesrights is equal to simply saying "Typical police behaviour" in /r/politics or "What do you expect from a fundie?" in /r/atheism: SO BRAVE.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 02:56 PM
0

I didn't say he was incorrect, I sarcastically implied that he hadn't contributed anything to the discussion.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 11:39 PM
-5

Thanks for that enlightened contribution.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 02:03 PM
18

Feminism is an inherently Marxian ideology which relies on women being the 'underclass' for the movement to have any validity. Every time the movement gains traction or has any kind of victory, they broaden their scope until the victory seems small and the 'miles to go' seem much greater than anything hitherto accomplished. This is why you can see avowed feminists controlling the disbursal of research grants in every major academic institution in the West, the tailoring of the legal system to su…
/r/MensRights02/03/13 01:58 PM
-2

Worldwide, domestic abuse is overwhelmingly perpetrated by men against women. This is not an article about Domestic Abuse in the US (which also exists, and which also portrays that narrower subject with equal fairness), it is about Domestic Abuse.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 01:45 PM
-12

Surprisingly, there is no source for that incorrect statistic.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 01:40 PM
1

I did no such thing, because it's irrelevant.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 11:37 PM
2

To be fair, I'm not sure Marilyn Frye has allowed herself a moment's pleasure since childhood.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 09:02 AM
0

"It doesn't count because women do it too," is your knock-down argument?
/r/MensRights22/02/13 08:17 AM
2

I knew a lot of guys like that in University. It bothered me to be exposed to their conversations sometimes. dude, i heard [name excised] fucked some slut out back of the [bar name]. yeah bro he gave her an ATM. (ass-to-mouth; i.e. he fucked her in the ass and then stuck his shitty dick in her mouth. It's desirable specifically because it's degrading.) I know a lot of the guys who come on this subreddit are not the type of guys who behave in this way, but it is not an uncommon behaviour pattern …
/r/MensRights22/02/13 06:17 AM
-2

A lot of commenters here seem to be missing the point. Frye argues that the act which men term 'fucking' (i.e. bro I heard u fucked that girl lol) is an act of superordination on the part of the man. Is that untrue? When guys compete with one another to see who can fuck more chicks, does that not necessarily entail the objectification of their targets?
/r/MensRights22/02/13 03:23 AM
2

Texan ranchers in the 1960s didn't own slaves.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 05:47 PM
-6

The censor blur can't obscure the armpit hair.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 05:45 PM
1

What about my statements led you to believe I would be in support of such laws, or of the use of unreported rapes in arguments by feminists?
/r/MensRights01/02/13 05:33 AM
1

We weren't talking about who the victims were. We were talking about who the perpetrators were.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 05:31 AM
1

The fact is a large majority of convicted criminals are indeed black. Show me a source on that.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 05:30 AM
1

We weren't talking about victims. The men who are victims are almost always victims of other men. In prison.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 05:29 AM
0

If they're not reported, how do you know they happen? Presuming that a figure is underreported doesn't allow you to inflate the known figure and base arguments upon it.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 03:39 AM
0

No, "Most criminals are black" is not equivalent to "Most rapists are men". They're logically equivalent, which I noted, and both arguments are fallacious, which I also noted. However, the one premise is true and the other one isn't. Most rapists are men. Most criminals are not black. That doesn't require any leap whatsoever. It's a statistical truth.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 03:36 AM
1

No.... no. I'm not defending the assumption. I clearly, explicitly stated it was a logical fallacy. More than once.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 03:30 AM
0

But with the men-as-rapists case it's a mistaken assumption that "most rapists are men" = "most men are rapists", which is at least predicated on an actual statistical truth, whereas the other is a mistaken assumption that "most criminals are black" = "most black people are criminals" which is predicated on a falsehood which is, itself, likely based in racism. The one is a single, relatively commonplace fallacy which perhaps leads to a discriminatory attitude. The other is a series of fallacies …
/r/MensRights31/01/13 02:39 AM
-2

You misunderstand me. Assuming a black man will be a criminal is a compositional fallacy based on an incorrect statistic (that most criminals are black) whereas assuming a man will be a rapist, while also a compositional fallacy, is at least based on a correct statistic (that most rapists are men). Therefore the analogy between the two fallacious assumptions doesn't stand. The situations aren't analogous.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 02:19 AM
5

In terms of national statistics, it's actually not true that a criminal is most likely to be black, whereas a rapist is most likely to be a man. That still doesn't make it fair to assume that all men are rapists, of course, but this analogy doesn't hold water. The majority of all criminals are not black; the majority of all rapists are men.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 12:51 AM
1

The word is 'goad', not 'coax', and what in God's name is this site you have it uploaded to? I can't even open this.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 07:42 AM
2

Man, don't feed the trolls. Getting you riled was his/her goal and not only did that work, you helped the troll reach a bunch more people here.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 12:41 AM
1

I'm not very solid on wave nomenclature.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 04:29 AM
11

Going by his comment, "a bachelor ... [living] in a cave, which gets cleaned up if [he] expect[s] a girl coming over"
/r/MensRights29/12/12 01:25 AM
-1

I'm not trolling. I actually think you're a moron.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 12:54 AM
1

To all the people who didn't understand my gripe, PartTimeBadman just summed it up very nicely.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 12:27 PM
2

No, that's fair.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 05:38 AM
-2

My grammar was perfect. I moved a few clauses around and joined them with different punctuation in an effort to make their structure a little simpler. I hope that helps. The essential message shouldn't have been difficult to understand at all.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 04:30 AM
3

It's sad that that's what it's come to. My original engagement with Feminism was in University where I took a series of Feminist Theory courses through the Philosophy department. Unfortunately for me, the Philosophy department is the last place you want to go to hear unbalanced views on anything, and so the version of Feminism that I received (and identified with, and bought in to) was a version that's been essentially dead for 40+ years, a version in which the rhetoric of equality still advocat…
/r/MensRights15/12/12 04:26 AM
1

The comment making a major undefended assumption about the politican stance of the villain in the OP should be at the top? Why? To further discredit this community?
/r/MensRights15/12/12 04:08 AM
7

Yeah, it's embarrassingly disingenuous to group the SlutWalk types in with the antisex types and then claim to be surprised when they act differently. People stereotype the MRM in very much the same way, and their doing so seems to claim one or two of the daily top posts on this subreddit. Hypocrisy is a danger to every movement, not just the ones you disagree with.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 04:05 AM
7

"I don't need feminism because I do not need anyone to speak for me". That sounds as though she has interpreted Feminism as a movement which threatens to take her voice, as a woman, away from her, or somehow to marginalize her opinions or views. That's a faulty interpretation. The movement of Feminism, even as much as it may be overstepping its perhaps disingenuously stated aims, is certainly not a movement with the intent or effect of disenfranchising women. EDIT: Either that or she wanted karm…
/r/MensRights15/12/12 03:57 AM
2

The doublethink is strong with this one.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 01:52 AM
57

Women supporting feminism isn't the problem. The problem is women demanding that men address their uniquely male social issues exclusively through the framework of feminist discourse. I don't care to see a woman recuse feminism any more than I care to see a man adopt it. "I deny feminism because I can speak for myself, thanks"? Really? That's what feminism is supposed to be - women speaking for themselves. The conflict arises when feminists think they also speak for me.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 01:36 AM
-5

"The fox smells his own hole first."
/r/MensRights14/12/12 03:47 PM
2

Feminism, in the way it is generally discussed, relies on the concept of class struggle. The theoretical importance of the all-powerful 'patriarchy', especially for including the suffix '-archy', ought to tell you as much. Then there's the underclass, the women and the men who feel that feel, constantly struggling against the empowered class. Sound familiar? Anyone claiming feminism isn't deeply inspired by Marxism or coloured by Marxist rhetoric either doesn't get feminism or doesn't get Marxis…
/r/MensRights14/12/12 02:22 PM
16

"You're a bigot and a fool." ... "You must be from the South." So that's what logic looks like. I suspect OP was green box man, and his his own name because he was unsure how bravely his bravery would be interpreted by the rest of the community.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 02:16 PM
3

At best. At worst, she wants to kill herself. Or be killed by a man who is also an MRA. I'm not sure how to figure this one out, as the writer's worldview doesn't allow for women who are advocates for men's rights.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 01:59 PM
3

And when those officers make a seemingly innocuous statement like "Don't dress like a slut" while giving advice on how to be rape-safe, whole movements spring up condemning them to the hell of being labeled a misogynist. I get equally angry when I see advice on how to be internet-safe, though. "Don't browse unsafe websites, accept contact invites from suspicious names, or download suspicious files." Fuck your computer-literarchy! We should instead focus computer safety campaigns on sending the m…
/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:39 AM
5

Don't forget that reading things like Jezebel but then being confronted with real-world anti-MRM events (like the Dr. Farrell protest in Toronto) will serve to perform the complementary opposite function.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 03:14 AM
14

Warren Farrell left in disgust and disillusionment. He was a conscientious objector who separated from the movement, not an internal enemy expunged by radicals. He and his breed seem, to me, to be much more the modern extension of the feminism of which he was champion and which is being represented now, in name, by the new-wave feminist types. It's sad and incredibly ironic that the people who best carry on the tradition of equal-rights feminism are everywhere lambasted and labeled (libeled?) as…
/r/MensRights14/12/12 03:13 AM
1

That's not really fair. Apart from fringe elements, the general tack of feminism is to allow that men, women and children all have their own unique problems. CAUSED BY THE PATRIARCHY. Which is why the overwhelming majority seems to demand that all discussion of such issues, men's and women's alike, be conducted within the framework of feminist theory. In this worldview, women's issues and men's issues are actually just patriarchy issues. That's the problem. It's not that they deny that men have …
/r/MensRights14/12/12 03:08 AM
-2

straw shitlord
/r/MensRights14/12/12 03:05 AM
0

Yes. Any white person who isn't a racist has to be a proponent of Affirmative Action, too. Where have you been for the last 20 years?
/r/MensRights14/12/12 03:04 AM
4

Hey, that's a dangerously narrow view of the issue. Men are totally allowed to stand up for themselvesprovided they do it through channels sanctioned by Femintern.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 03:02 AM
2

Fuck you, Men's Rights Activists, for wanting your own movement and for feeling that your issues are not best expressed by opting in to a movement centred explicitly around the rights of women. Makes as much sense as anything else on Jezebel. You might as well just have linked to their complete archive.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 03:00 AM
4

"Fuck you for showing up any time women speak [...] and trying to make it all about you." In a post deciding that the only valid channel for the outlet of male issues is via the framework of Feminist discourse. My irony receptors just clamped shut.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 02:58 AM
3

I'm not certain it provides a tangible benefit to them, either. Believing you're saving the world while it falls to pieces around you isn't actually an improvement in your condition.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 02:34 PM
1

No true Scotsman, etc.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 10:14 AM
5

They made a mistake. 'Defining men's and women's roles' is used as an example of 'Using male privilege', whereas the whole concept of 'male privilege' is in fact based on an arbitrarily defined 'male role'. I hope that wasn't intentional!!!!
/r/MensRights13/12/12 10:09 AM
7

I love kids and they love me. I'm a trained teacher with experience. I'm animated and funny (to kids, anyway) and can play multiple instruments and do dozens of funny cartoon voices while reading books and can explain concepts well in terms children understand. I love playing games and making crafts. I'm the epitome of what makes a good kindergarten teacher, but I'm never going to attempt to become one, because everyone will assume I'm a pedophile for wanting to become a kindie teacher. People a…
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:42 AM
16

There's also the stigma associated with being a battered husband. "His wife beat him? Guess we know who wears the pants," etc. A similar stigma causes male-on-male rape to go vastly underreported as well.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 06:51 AM
15

The East Asian respect for teachers is phenomenal. I've been teaching English here for 5 years and never had the slightest problem. I've had a single middle school-aged female student come to my house, at night, alone for half a year and there have been no problems whatsoever. I will not be continuing in the teaching profession if I ever move back to North America, because of stories like yours. I'm a good teacher, too. Bullshit like this is holding our whole society back. I hope you have found …
/r/MensRights13/12/12 06:49 AM
2

You know that is just a search delimiter, right? "Add to dictionary" just means "Exclude this term from future spell checks".
/r/MensRights12/12/12 05:55 PM
3

This news story and everyone featured in it seem to be pretty firmly against the validity of the woman's obviously ludicrous plea. The reporter herself is very harsh. This news story is actually not reportage. It's an editorial with a very clearly expressed opinion. Why do you guys have a problem with this?
/r/MensRights05/01/12 12:22 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter