TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

priest-killer Archive

View 0 posts and 51 comments by priest-killer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Mostly boils down to being autistic. NTs really dislike us by nature. Our faces aren't expressive enough to make them comfortable, our communication style creates friction, etc. On top of that, low friendliness, low gregariousness, generally bad neurotypical social skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/22 04:19 AM
0

Most domestic violence is actually women attacking men. In fact, women are more likely to be murderers than being murdered. (Ladies are about equally as likely to be stuck by lightning vs murdered.)
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/22 04:03 AM
2

Women tend to have a sense of hypo-agency. Meaning they believe life happens to them, and other people are responsible for all their woes. Feminism doesn't do anything, it's just a reflection of biology. Feminism is female nature politicized. (You could also characterize it as a set of luxury beliefs.)
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/22 03:45 AM
1

I could only think of a tiny number of examples, like ladies advocating for equality up to the point that it costs them something. (Like mandatory military service, such as the selective service men have to apply for & feminists lobbied to keep women out of.) I guess I could also point towards women's stronger ingroup bias (meaning higher antagonism towards men by nature)... which I suspect contributes to women seeing men as acting as a monolith, when thats more in line with female psychology. N…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/22 01:14 AM
0

Feminism has a definition, it also has a measurable reality. It's possible that, in practice, it's actually a female supremacist movement. You'd have to measure to find out, not consult a dictionary.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/22 01:03 AM
–

Bluepill (in this context) would refer to a humans default outlook on gender relations, a priori, before experience. Redpill would refer to an understanding of gender relations that occurs a posteriori, after experience
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/22 12:56 AM
-1

Good substitute for reading it is just watching his videos. I've seen at least 100 hours of him, which I consider functionally equivalent.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/22 12:27 AM
–

Women can smell desperation.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/22 12:10 AM
1

Polygamous societies are a lot more violent bc fewer men are getting laid. I don't know if having a violent, unstable society rises to the level of "need", but murder / life and death is on the line without question.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 11:45 PM
1

It's probably an improvement over outright slavery, which was the dominant system for most of our history. There's probably some room for improvement, too.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 10:57 PM
1

Folks have a tendency to justify their evil actions as not evil, since we have a psychological need to see ourselves as good. But lying to yourself is pretty darn penalizing. You gradually lose the capacity to be honest with yourself at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 10:25 PM
1

Ye, that all sounds accurate. Some people can take the bad stuff and turn it into good stuff, others cacan't. Probably boils down to genetics at that point. (In the Quran they basically say God made an awful lot of people who are blind.)
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 10:05 PM
1

I'm doubtful of that, but their actions do drive them into a mental paradigm that produces suffering. Nobody should believe it til they've seen it for themselves, so I admire and respect your skepticism.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 10:01 PM
1

That's actually a mediocre paraphrasing of a much cooler lesson. That lesson being that an evil deed doesn't immediately bear fruit, like fresh milk doesn't curdle right away. But it does eventually have nasty consequences for the perpetrator. It's a lesson about the nature of sin. (It needs to be taught because it's far from obvious.)
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 09:41 PM
1

Nothing against kids! There are just intensely high qualifications to study some of this stuff. Qualifications that the majority of college educated adults fall short of. Maybe one in a thousand are ready for it, but probably far less. (Iirc Plato suggested we keep people away from phosophy entirely until their mid 30s.)
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 09:32 PM
1

"Holding on to anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned." These lessons are far, far too advanced for children. It's absurd we even try.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 09:20 PM
5

I generally tell women the truth (i.e. I've had terrible luck with women), and predictably that leads to them seeing me as garbage. But I'm always looking to filter out women who need to be "gamed."
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 08:45 PM
1

Good Q. Most of our suffering is self-inflicted. To use the Christian model for a moment, "pride" and its various manifestations are a lot like sugar. There's an upfront good feeling of being wrathful towards someone, for instance, but there are long-term effects as well. We're fairly blind to those long-term effects, but seeing them and acting accordingly would be purifying your mind. Hinduism is actually close to Plato's ethics, that model describes the problem as ignorance. So anger, for inst…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 07:14 PM
1

The bottom 80% does exist :]
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 06:48 PM
1

Dat could be. I also have respect for Buddha tho, who turned down a life living in a palace (and living in caves) and opted for a middle-ground.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 06:02 PM
0

Good distinction, very respectable. My own outlook is humans are fundamentally evil, so we will always take something with a neutral-ish nature (like capitalism) and warp it into corporatism.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 06:01 PM
5

Another possibility is you underestimate my personality limitations. Let me summarize quickly. I'm in the 3rd percentile for gregariousness, meaning I don't really find interaction with other humans rewarding. I'm in the 2nd percentile for friendliness, meaning there's basically none. I'm also autistic, and paired with my gregariousness, I've basically got nothing resembling neurotypical social skills. (In fact, to me, what are called social skills looks like it's mostly just lying, which isn't …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 04:42 PM
2

Women are better at communicating with other women. That doesn't mean they're better in general. (Men are better at communicating with other men, autistics are better at communicating with other autistics. Each group has its own communication style.) I think you're probably off-base in saying they're more supportive as well, but it depends on the topic. There's more than a few areas where women won't give men any sympathy & wont understand their struggles. About a year ago I had a female friend …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 04:37 PM
5

I'm 6'2 and generally cute. Clear the physical attraction bar easily. But I've got spiritual ambitions rather than financial ones, and a personality that most women find repulsive. Since I'm not interested in changing who I am, it means I'm permanently locked in the bottom 80%. So -- hard for some, easy for others. I think the important thing to keep in mind is that if anyone could hop in and out of the 20% at will, it wouldn't be the 80-20 rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 04:27 PM
1

Spiritual "beleivers" are not very impressive; people who claim to believe this or that. But spiritual practicioners, like monks, can be quite impressive. You can generally see their progress for yourself. Having a model for working on "purifying your mind" can be advantageous in the right hands, which is what Spiritual philosophies can provide. But like another poster mentioned, a lot of it is genetic (and the rest is environmental.) Most people aren't qualified to study something like Christia…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 06:22 AM
2

Google "world's happiest man." (Matthieu Ricard.)
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 06:13 AM
3

I'd say there are objectively bad personalities once you've established some premises. Like, bad at what? Bad for spiritual growth? There are certainly bad personalities for that. Bad for dating? Bad for day-trading? Yep, also some objectively good and bad personalities. (But you're right that physical hotness carries the day. My personality, for instance, is socially abysmal, but I'm hot enough that people treat me okay and tend to give me the benefit of the doubt.)
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 06:04 AM
18

People look for happiness in the wrong places. Rich, famous musicians contemplate suicide. If you look at the wealthiest people on the earth, you'll find their happiness levels are frequently no better than homeless folks. In my view, the people who understand happiness best are those involved in spiritual philosophies, ranging from Taosim to Islam. Personally, I've been studying advaita vedanta (hinduism) for a while.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 02:24 AM
3

Fellow autistic person here. Normies don't care about those costs. Even for what appear to be transparently parasitic relationships, there are enormous quantities of men who are down to get sucked dry. Probably relates to NTs being far more obsessed with sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 02:02 AM
3

Higher T does make you more sensitive to status slights. So you'd probably see more men "trying hard", giving women better options. You'd also (for sure) see higher levels of domestic violence. It's hard to think about the net outcomes (good or bad) of such complex systems.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 12:42 AM
0

Feminists cant have a big impact on the world. Ideology is like biology's shadow, so I'm very sympathetic to pointing towards low T. (Though boiling it down to blaming one gender or the other would be silly.) Economics probably has the tightest 'interface' with biology and it's relationship to relationships, since relationships are fundamentally (biologically speaking) all about economics. I'd blame capitalism, but that's just a biological manifestation of our ability to out-group others and tre…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 12:27 AM
6

Good advice for that goal orientation. My advice would be change your goal orientation; develop gratitude for what you already have. I could become a different person and find more social acceptance, or I could become a person who cares less about social acceptance. Those two paths head in opposite directions, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 11:35 PM
0

There are probably good reasons for homosexuality in the gene pool. I've seen evidence suggesting the sisters of gay men are hotter (meaning higher fertility / more kids.) Natural selection is a brutal process. Any trait that exists at rates above 1% is probably doing something functionally useful, either for the individual or the species.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 10:58 PM
21

Similar with autistics. Research shows people want nothing to do with us after 2-4 seconds of interaction, based entirely on style (tone of voice, inflection, facial expression..) and not substance (content of speech.) Folks gravely underestimate how superficial we are as a species.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 09:19 PM
1

Determined my mom was an awful, horrible human by the time I was 15 or so. TRP slightly contributes to some forgiveness for her, since I understand female nature better. But she's still a dark-triad-heavy alcoholic with a severely unpleasant personality disorder, and I'm still insistent on having no interactions with her whatsoever, starting from age 18 and continuing to 35.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 06:36 PM
3

Education probably reduces the risk because it's a proxy for income, but thats just an offhand guess. (More lower income marriages end in divorce.)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 06:33 PM
10

This will sound dense, but I learned women want male attention to a similar degree that men want female attention. (If not more.)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 06:30 PM
11

To be fair, I had to interact with a few hundred women before I learned that I don't like them.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 06:29 PM
4

Criticizing a woman is a tad like trying to criticize Israel. Someone's gonna call you a bigot, someone else might try to incite violence against you. In most domains, humans are deeply biased in favor of women. Notably, I'm an autistic male, which allows me to speak truth to anyone I interact with and not care about their opinions at all. I don't call out women because it's not productive. (Wouldnt be productive for women to do it, either. Biology is unbeatable.)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 05:32 AM
1

You asked.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 05:03 AM
2

If you're someone who worships their ego & is deeply involved in materialism, then you should conclude women have it easier in life. If you're looking to become christlike, be a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 04:05 AM
9

Sad but true. Usually took me about 5 weeks to figure out when needed to do like it was a QuickTime event.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 02:28 AM
1

Feminism is female nature politicized. It will advocate for whatever benefits women. But because not all women have their interests 100% aligned, it will also advocate for both sides of every issue. It's for and against trans people, it's for and against porn, etc. In short, it's not a real movement and it contains no real principles. It's just "whatever is useful to women at the moment." If you believe in subjective morality and subjective values, then you could say this is a form of promoting …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 02:25 AM
1

Everyone is biased towards attractiveness. People will treat you very differently depending on how you dress. But "penalized" could be incorrect, depending on how you look at it. Having the material world less accessible to you can be one of the greatest blessings.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 02:18 AM
1

My world-worshiping side would prefer to be a woman, but my God-worshiping side would prefer to be a man. There are reasons men are more likely to become saints.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 02:12 AM
11

Desperate doesn't mean you know how to improve. In fact, it might indicate the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 01:08 AM
30

Everyone is goal driven. Even rats and birds. The only room for discussion is whether or not "transactional" is the best way to characterize what's happening. The way you choose to characterize this issue will (not might, will) have an impact on the way you look at relationships. Interactions with my wife could be characterized as transactional, but I don't see them that way. It's more like symbiosis. There are natural (not contrived) benefits of us being together. If we saw things as purely tra…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 01:06 AM
1

By nature, humans externalize evil; meaning evil is an outside force. They worship their own ego, again, by nature's design. The Abrahamic religions are all about flipping that on its head -- an internalization of evil. That's the goal of their philosophy precisely because it's the opposite of what humans do in their natural state of ignorance. But the number of people who experience that kind of "repentance" -- the number even capable of it on a biological level -- is only one in thousands. Tld…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 05:28 PM
2

I'd agree with you that the behavior feels disgusting. Feels like "fairweather friends" or whatever. Naked opportunism. But most of nature is horrifying, creatures eating other creatures alive. Not sure how much we can criticize someone for being born the way they were born.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 05:14 PM
4

Women evolved to be attracted to men who can garner group acceptance/popularity. Men respect the person who achieves something, (regardless if it makes them popular or not), but don't use this attraction. It's just evolution in action. I'm not sure I'd characterize it as abstract respect, id probably call it something like group belongingness, but close enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 05:05 PM
1

Ppl supposedly form emotional connections, knowing the women in the pictures could indicate that, as a basis for "emotional cheating."
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 04:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter