TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

primaloath Archive

View 25 posts and 426 comments by primaloath on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
257

primaloath/r/MensRights23/08/12 01:36 PM
65

primaloath/r/MensRights08/04/12 11:41 PM
45

primaloath/r/MensRights05/10/12 05:16 AM
41

primaloath/r/MensRights20/09/12 10:05 PM
24

primaloath/r/MensRights02/09/12 09:05 AM
19

primaloath/r/MensRights03/09/12 07:25 PM
16

primaloath/r/MensRights12/08/12 06:34 PM
14

primaloath/r/MensRights07/09/12 07:35 AM
13

primaloath/r/MensRights29/09/12 03:56 AM
11

primaloath/r/MensRights22/08/12 07:48 AM
11

primaloath/r/MensRights30/08/12 06:53 PM
11

primaloath/r/MensRights05/06/12 09:45 PM
10

primaloath/r/MensRights05/09/12 06:44 PM
7

primaloath/r/MensRights13/08/12 09:40 PM
7

primaloath/r/MensRights23/08/12 01:26 AM
6

primaloath/r/MensRights31/08/12 10:53 PM
6

primaloath/r/MensRights07/09/12 05:20 PM
6

primaloath/r/MensRights13/02/12 12:59 PM
6

primaloath/r/MensRights20/05/12 05:39 PM
4

primaloath/r/MensRights27/06/12 08:58 AM
4

primaloath/r/MensRights09/07/12 10:52 AM
1

primaloath/r/MensRights02/10/12 09:13 PM
0

primaloath/r/MensRights08/06/12 08:51 PM
0

primaloath/r/MensRights07/09/12 08:47 PM
0

primaloath/r/MensRights04/10/11 12:30 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Perhaps the mods could simply rename it? I de-upvoted it after finding out that the title was misleading, but I would happily re-upvote it if it said "male on male rape".
/r/MensRights17/10/12 07:32 PM
107

Or a psychopath. She did lie to the driver about having no money for the bus trip.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 10:03 PM
3

Seconded.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 07:26 PM
1

My hat is off to ArchangelleDaddy for the fantastic username. The only problem is that people might actually think /MensRights is linked to SRS if they are very unfamiliar with both and spot the moderators' names before reading the content, but I don't foresee that happening.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 06:51 PM
1

The AVFM forum is a good place to find people in your local area: http://forums.avoiceformen.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=16 Create a throwaway account and advertise yourself. Also, if you live in the UK, consider this: http://brightonmanplan.wordpress.com/2012/09/12/conference-fringe-event-mens-rights-event/
/r/MensRights15/10/12 03:22 PM
-2

Yeah. I was pointing out that he struck me as this kind of person, and it's a shame I got downvoted for it.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 03:09 PM
10

In all fairness, he did throw her out of the bus, and passagers only intervened after she came back in, to try to stop him from hitting her (because she was a woman).
/r/MensRights14/10/12 02:01 PM
-6

I could agree with some of his points, but he threw in the word "offensive" three times across the relatively short blog post. I can only speculate that he has no sense of objective right or wrong, and must instead describe things in relation to his feelings.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:31 AM
1

What's the bus driver's name and where did he work? I would like to make a petition to reinstate him.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 01:08 PM
0

Nope. Never said that. Frankly, given all the downvoting and the tone of your statement, I don't want to bother explaining myself to you.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 08:03 PM
0

I didn't downvote you, either. Interesting to see a downvote brigade here.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 05:24 PM
1

This has been my experience as well.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 10:31 AM
-18

I am 100% in favour of making abortion illegal, with the exception of incest, rape etc. The availability of easy abortion is one thing that drives the high age of marriage in the Western world and leads to more children being born with birth defects (not to mention more men living a decade or so of near-celibacy because the carousel-riders want to have their jollies with the bad boy crowd before they "settle"). As for more women making false rape allegations, well, y'know, with the development o…
/r/MensRights12/10/12 09:42 AM
1

"Primal Oath", by the way. This relates to personal responsibility. If one believes that all individuals are to be judged on the basis of their personal virtue - their adherence to honesty, justice (which is easy to define), honour and loving devotion - then one goes beyond authoritarianism / libertarianism and the left / right paradigm. A society in which personal responsibility is valued and virtues are cultivated will have very different laws compared to one in which self-seeking, irresponsib…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 10:37 PM
2

Or three dimensions. There is also virtue / vice.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 09:23 PM
2

This is both impractical and cruel to a lot of people, both men and women. Genetic engineering might be a feasible solution, though. Also, keep in mind that IQ does not fully predict a person's aptitude for metacognition and moral reasoning, both of which are absolutely critical.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 06:16 PM
1

Morality is inherently superior to animal cunning and brute force, as all civilizations can attest. If you want an example of cultural Darwinism, look at the black community in the US and tell me how that's working out.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 06:07 PM
2

There is a huge difference between competition and aspiration. You can be inspired by others to strive for perfection without ever wanting to make them lose, bash their heads into the ground and / or take things away from them. Competition brings people down, mutual inspiration elevates them. As for handout families, I won't even comment.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 06:02 PM
5

The feminist slant I've seen around here is something like "HOW DARE WOMEN BE CHOOSY!" This seems to be an entirely reasonable argument: why shouldn't people be able to choose? Because when you choose to snub ten different perfectly decent people on your hunt for the bad boy, you are ruining their lives and potentially the lives of your children (if your bad boy turns out to be bad enough to commit child abuse). Your choices affect others; they have consequences that can be devastating to those …
/r/MensRights10/10/12 04:39 PM
2

Not a healthy article. These Big Daddies turn up repeatedly in the family tree (meaning fewer total male ancestors). Meanwhile, the majority of men died childless, evolutionary dead ends. So far this doesn't sound so good for men. But Baumeister calls it "the single most underappreciated fact about gender." A lot of men dying childless, without a family of their own, is a horrible thing, an atrocity against men as a whole, yet this article says nothing to condemn it. Indeed, it praises it and su…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 09:53 AM
0

I would also add that if something is unjust, social expectations should not come into it; there is no reason a good woman would expect someone to give her a free ride. If she doesn't bring any money, a scene at the restaurant will help her realize that she is not a good woman and that she ought to improve.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 01:38 AM
1

I'm in the UK, a lot of us seem to go Dutch here (except for some very manipulative women).
/r/MensRights09/10/12 03:18 PM
0

Right next to the title, you can see that the link is to smh.com.au. This indicates that the site is Australian. I agree that clarity would help, however.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 02:42 PM
7

Violence and fighting are only friendly if you're sparring or playing online, i.e. not hurting each other. Then they can be a lot of fun. Sorry to go off-topic.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 08:05 AM
0

It's true that women are attracted to people with Dark Triad traits and regard good people with contempt (particularly during the times these good people are vulnerable and defeated). This is the nature of female hypergamy and the cause of most of the world's evils. treat them like you won't show them respect unless they show you respect. That's exactly the issue. A good person treats people as innocent until proven guilty, i.e. he shows them respect until they demonstrate they do not deserve it…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 08:14 AM
1

The fact that you don't understand or adhere to certain values makes no difference as to whether or not they are universal. They still apply, regardless of how you feel about them.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 06:05 AM
4

To answer your last question, it's important for all good people in the workplace to be comfortable and not face any kind of hostility. For employees to treat each other kindly and respectfully is important for their mental well-being, albeit the word "gentleman" is not one I would have used to describe the right attitude. I agree with you on all other issues.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 07:54 PM
1

I'm not in the US. Would it be appropriate for me to also send a comment?
/r/MensRights04/10/12 07:12 PM
8

It sounds like she had borderline personality disorder. This is not someone anyone should be put into the position of dating.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 09:13 PM
12

If anything, this makes me skeptical of women's tears and more prone to value those of men.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 12:27 AM
1

Concern about cultural misandry is usually considered the preserve of frothy bloggers and unhinged men's rights activists, but the routine denigration and mockery of any man who deviates from heroic and patriarchal gender ideals – in movies, TV and advertising, in media coverage and political discourse – should concern anyone who desires a more fair and less gender-bound society. Shows his colours, I suppose.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 12:12 AM
2

I wouldn't bring my family into this, but I do believe birth control is something both members of the couple should spend money on. How many single mothers ended up that way because of divorce? How many ended up single mothers, like I did... because their husband died? Exactly what is this "massive neon sign" that allows you to determine a woman that was abandoned by a bum, and the so called "slut"? The fact that she is a single mother means she is raising at least one child, who is evidence of …
/r/MensRights03/10/12 12:01 AM
-2

As they say regarding poachers: when the buying stops, the killing can too. Don't be a fool, don't throw money at a slut.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 09:22 PM
0

What about the young couples who think they love each other, and say a condom breaks, and they end up pregnant. Two people can afford birth control, as it is their mutual responsibility to plan their family properly. When we're talking about one person unilaterally taking birth control, we're talking about a slut. And if you truly believe that only "women who are slutting around" are the ones to have unwanted pregnancies, where does that leave men? Most men are decent; women tend to go for a lim…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 09:00 AM
-1

Let me ask you this: do you feel it benefits you to prevent an unwanted pregnancy? You're not the one with the responsibility to prevent an unwanted pregnancy, the potential mother is. And if she is slutting around, I doubt any decent person would want to finance her lifestyle. What if the issue instead was covering heart issues. If they said "well, it was your choice to eat steak and twinkies, and since it was your own choice, we won't cover your heart medication or surgery". It's far more diff…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 08:52 PM
2

The thing I benefitted from most in terms of child abuse recovery was leaving home. Another thing that helped me was (much later) developing a stable attachment with a good, trustworthy parent figure.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 10:27 AM
3

Why is this even posted? Yes, there are idiots who troll. Unless this is a call to action to kick him off the internet, who cares? In any case, re-criminalize trolling! (It was criminal in my home country in the early 20th century)
/r/MensRights01/10/12 09:24 AM
1

I don't think the man in your quote has good identions, and he probably doesn't really think he does, either.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 11:09 PM
1

I get angry at people who willfully commit injustice and sad when they commit injustices while believing they are doing good. For me, what matters are people's intentions. Not sure if this helps.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 05:31 PM
-1

I'd rather have fewer rights for cruel people and more for the good people who need them.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 05:02 PM
3

No, I'll probably be willing to sign the petition after I check the facts. It takes a lot less time to check facts that someone else has made than to search for them and compile them without really knowing what you're going to find. I was worried that someone might make that comment. I'll try to be clearer in the future.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 04:39 PM
6

In fact, tell me if you won't design it, so I can make it myself. I'm sure we can get 1,000 people in the Atheist and Men's Rights communities to sign it.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 09:39 AM
5

I am unfamiliar with the details of Justin Vacula's activities and so cannot compile the information myself, but if you make a counter-petition in support of him, I will happily sign it.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 09:38 AM
1

I was talking about Manzboobz. Apologies for not making that clearer.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 10:24 PM
3

Seconded. This may very well be cherry-picking.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 12:24 PM
1

Great, get a picture of yourself holding a sign, and send it to her.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 12:14 PM
1

I would also like an invite, actually.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 03:58 AM
3

This is a troll account, I'm sorry to say.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 02:48 AM
2

As someone who was abused in childhood because his mother was looking for an alpha male, who sought female attachment figures for more than a decade and couldn't find one in a young woman because every one of those he approached turned out to be a callous scumbag looking for an alpha male, I myself am fed up with women. You can't exactly fall in love with someone who would ditch you in a heartbeat for a psychopathic "upgrade", and who weighs you as a "romantic interest" on the basis of whether o…
/r/MensRights29/09/12 02:47 AM
4

Don't just be serious, be respectful, and definitely don't "shut him down". People come to believe things for a reason, and that reason should never be because someone else pressured them into believing. I'm amazed at how this idiot can suggest you "shut down" your friend for having ideas you disagree with. If you genuinely believe they're false, discuss them and their origins in as kind and consider a manner as you can.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 02:40 AM
7

This is on PsychologyToday, an extremely unreliable source. She does not cite her own sources, either.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 02:16 AM
1

How long does it take for that fictional civilization to collapse / develop artificial wombs? Do the women sabotage the development of artificial wombs in order to maintain their power base?
/r/MensRights28/09/12 09:47 AM
2

It is malevolent if it is intended to make you feel bad. For instance, someone who says "Hahahaha, you're so wrong, stupid clansman, hahahaha!" is clearly being malevolent, as is someone making a sarcastic comment about your being a clansman etc. You would have no right to censor someone who is saying it to provide you with factual information or who earnestly believes they have a better worldview and wants you to compare it against your clansman worldview (without being vexatious and without tr…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 09:26 PM
1

Saying the likes of "STFU hahaha you're just a retard" is a lot different from criticizing someone with the aim of getting them to improve, and with the genuine belief that the improvements they make will actually benefit them, not just you. There are essentially two forms of debate: first, there is debate which is intended to uplift the understanding of all participants, ensuring that everyone, both those who were right and those who were wrong, come away with at least a better understanding of…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 02:21 PM
7

You need to understand that victims of abuse are not big fans of free speech zones. Some of us (not me) are big fans of having safe spaces, others (like me) are big fans of sending trolls to death row, knowing that they are, at heart, pure evil. There is a difference between the freedom to speak benevolently and the freedom to speak malevolently. The first should be encouraged, the latter warrants opposition to the speaker.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 08:59 AM
3

Who was to blame for the divorce, and did any of your parents behave abusively prior to it? Did you experience any trauma in the wake of divorce, and if so, how did you cope with it?
/r/MensRights27/09/12 12:04 AM
0

Violating the facebook TOS doesn't send one to prison, though.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 03:18 PM
-4

The exact quote is "I think of a man; and I take away reason and accountability."
/r/MensRights26/09/12 09:28 AM
-5

Isn't cyberbullying illegal in some parts of the world? I would definitely campaign for it to become illegal everywhere. It would ensure that the atheism+ people go where they belong, i.e. in prison.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 08:00 AM
1

I agree, though there are plenty of ways to laugh without ridiculing people, even in jest.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 06:57 PM
-5

I personally don't like teases of any kind, and really dislike it when people take offense to being politely asked to stop. I prefer being in teams whose members support rather than laugh at each other.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 06:36 PM
1

I have had the same experience with real-life anarchists in my home town. They will attempt to use the power of their hive mind to collectively bog you down with shaming language and ideological trifles until you either break down or cut contact with them. Then they will crawl back into their abandoned warehouses and steal the city's electricity.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 06:32 PM
1

These are individual actions, therefore agency can be assigned to one individual, and is hopefully assigned to the person to blame. In the case of a child of divorced parents, his/her mother can be diagnosted with anything from psychopathy and narcissistic personality disorder to bipolar disorder. However, all that he / she is suffering from is a lack of decent parents. I personally know what it means not to have real parents, having grown up in a dysfunctional family, and I would not consider i…
/r/MensRights25/09/12 12:22 PM
2

Look up workplace bullying. It sounds like you have a petty tyrant / person with narcissistic personality disorder in your workplace.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 10:33 AM
6

"The bottom line – it is not a disorder within one individual," said Dr. Darrel Regier, vice chair of the task force drafting the manual. "It's a relationship problem – parent-child or parent-parent. Relationship problems per se are not mental disorders." I have to agree here. There can be destructive consequences to labeling something as a mental disorder.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 05:35 AM
-1

Seduction is manipulation, which hijacks a person's thought processes and steers them away from the truth, causing them to do things they would never have consented to had they known the whole truth. Is that also not morally wrong?
/r/MensRights25/09/12 01:10 AM
13

If there is a feminist presence on campus, you will face tremendous hostility from it. If getting the student group officially approved involves any bureaucratic process, it will be rejected under vague pretexts by unscrupulous liberals. There is nothing preventing you from getting together with other students unofficially, however, and you would be best to look up the various legal means of advertising the group. If it is legal where you live, secretly record all your interactions with people d…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 10:04 PM
2

Having been to some of the Occupy movement's meetings in my more naive days, I agree with you on the idea that the OWS folks want to exploit good people under the cover of false victimization. Just as there is hypoagency, there is also hyperagency, which involves being responsible for both one's self and others. In an ideal society, all individuals possess hyperagency, tending to both themselves and each other. The problem arises when some people manifest an exploitative form of hypoagency - exp…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 09:35 PM
3

This is an important topic, and also one of the instances in which misandry is practiced by women as a whole rather than strictly feminists. It points to a lack of love by women towards men, and suggests that they would much rather engage in "relationships" out of self-interest than to care for a man and see to his happiness. I'm not sure how other people feel, but I would forego sex entirely given the opportunity to produce children by different means. The idea of artificial wombs is particular…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 09:42 AM
15

I wonder how many women would "hold out for the perfect man" or ride the "alpha" c*ck carousel in their 20s, and reject 30-odd perfectly decent people for marriage, if they knew these men had an option to have their own family without female intervention. They would all suddenly forego their strength and independence and crawl around begging for male attention, no doubt.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 07:44 AM
4

This is why, for the good of our children, we need to get organized and ensure that they hold no further social influence.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 07:24 AM
1

Indeed, in more primitive times, many may well have died due to war, disputes with other males and dangerous work. However, it's worth mentioning that in tribes such as the Taino, which were supposedly peace-loving agrarians, a single male (the tribal chief) could have as many as 30 wives, though smaller-scale polygamy, monogamy and polyandry were also common. One must ask where the surplus of women came from.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 07:24 PM
6

Notice that a lion does not just sit around sleeping all day. When duty calls, they leave their computers for a few hours, chase some female lions, fight for one who is really hot, and goes home with them to live happily ever after I would never compete with other men; if someone is unjust, I oppose him/her, but I do not compete for resources, as that is plainly immoral. If this is what a woman expects people to do in order for her to become attracted to them, she has no capacity to love and wou…
/r/MensRights23/09/12 07:10 PM
4

Be an honourable woman. Respect all honourable men around you; do not shit-test them, do not dump them once someone that gets you hotter comes along. Overcome your filthy vaginal tingles for evil men and approach men who would make good parents, husbands and people in general, as well as who would benefit from the love of a good woman. Is that a good start?
/r/MensRights23/09/12 07:08 PM
8

Listen, workplace bullying is a real and very serious problem. The last thing we really need are people who make vacuous complaints about the available solutions without proposing a solution of their own.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 07:10 AM
0

I think it's more productive to simply aim at the designers of these t-shirts etc.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 11:17 PM
8

This coupled with my teachers and even family telling me I was dumb and who I was wasn't good enough took a toll on me. Teaching people that women always go for good men (as opposed to going by their evil hypergamous instincts a lot of the time) leads to two problems. First, it makes women more likely to go by their evil hypergamous instincts rather than suppress them. Second, it creates the perception that if a man cannot "keep" a woman, he must not have been a good person.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 09:22 PM
20

Look up "workplace bullying" and "workplace mobbing". Support the Healthy Workplace Bill if you're in the US, read up on anti-harrassment law if you're in the UK.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 09:14 PM
-3

Having grown up with a narcissistic father, I am very happy with any law that criminalizes psychological abuse, particularly in an age in which one can cheaply and elegantly record another person's activities. Hopefully, this law will be extended beyond domestic settings.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 09:12 PM
0

Hearsay or recordings. If the whole situation is presented, one has compelling evidence of malicious intent.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 09:09 PM
2

The point is that a single mother was resentful of all those children who would go to a father-daughter dance, so she asked the ACLU to clamp down on the event. It's ludicrous. If she wanted to make it more inclusive, she would have asked for it to be extended to mothers, or ideally to be a "parent-child dance". What she did was ask for the event to be shut down.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 12:57 PM
2

Thanks a lot for the reply. I really need to read more on this subject.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 10:59 PM
-5

These evil creatures need a good firing squad.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 10:07 PM
1

Amen. Good grief, I wish I had my virginity back.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 05:12 PM
1

Okay, but three things to note. First, there is the question of whether being a dom in a relationship also means you're a dom in the rest of your day-to-day life; the few doms I have known have all been nasty, domineering people outside of their relationship. Second, the submissive person may well be sexually submissive because of unresolved child abuse, and if that's the case, they should probably address the abuse rather than embracing it. There is, finally, the issue of permanent injury, eith…
/r/MensRights20/09/12 04:17 PM
1

I disagree. People with borderline personality disorder, for instance, typically get involved in horrible relationships, accept drugs etc, all with their own consent. The fact that they're consenting doesn't mean they're not being idiots and destroying their own lives as well potentially those of others through their consent.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 04:11 PM
-1

I wonder why people always insist that if something is consensual, it's absolutely nothing of concern... What does the consensual act say about the character of the people involved?
/r/MensRights19/09/12 07:12 PM
0

The issue here is that "extreme" views might very well be true and therefore worth discussing. I do believe that women can be trusted on some matters, for example, but would generally refuse to trust a woman on others, e.g. when it came to dating advice. There is scientific research (on the so-called "ovulation goggles") that supports parts of my stance; imagine if said research had not been carried out because people felt it could lead to "extreme" conclusions. Men and women generally cannot be…
/r/MensRights19/09/12 02:30 PM
17

I would add that the whole Nice Guy (TM) thing is an excellent way for rotten women to reassure themselves that all the rejections they dished out in the pursuit of "the right man" were morally justified. The hamster is strong with them.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 08:00 PM
9

I agree. The fact that women behave hypocritically when it comes to romance is a problem that needs to be addressed, at least by us loudly presenting our side of it in the media. We can see the effects that unbridled female hypergamy has had in the black American community, with girls being taught by their single mothers to follow their impulses, then going to the bad boy thugs to get knocked up and teaching their own girls to follow their own impulses. In smaller, more robust communities, shit-…
/r/MensRights18/09/12 07:56 PM
2

The only people I am aware of who can match their hypocrisy are bona fide psychopaths.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 05:13 PM
1

I cannot begin to express how grateful I am to hear a woman display original insight into this and disagree with common women on the morality of doing so.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 09:40 AM
4

It's worth noticing how even in the 1980s, the feminists tried to indoctrinate the idea that women are entitled to beat up a man if he doesn't approach them with romantic overtures in the way they want him to.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 01:16 AM
1

I would just like to say that if my mother were a hardened criminal, I would want to see her in prison (or send her there) and to find a new mother figure.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 05:57 PM
0

Sorry for replying so late. I gave the 80% to 20% figure as an example, although I am aware that it's only mentioned in PUA circles. The only numbers I have come from a study that looked at students in a financial school, and whereas male students had no preference towards female income (and were only mildly concerned about her looks), the female students would only be willing to date or marry men in the top 33% income bracket (the more serious the commitment, the richer he had to be). I do know…
/r/MensRights17/09/12 05:44 PM
1

You state "extermination is not a proportionate punishment for a crime that causes no physical harm". Suffering is not limited to physical harm - psychological harm, particularly emotional harm also exists. The fact that you do not acknowledge it (when others suffer it, at least) is irrelevant, as the harm - inflicted on an innocent person - still manifests. Furthermore, psychological harm can lead to suicide, and anyone who willfully inflicts psychological harm that leads to suicide is a murder…
/r/MensRights15/09/12 07:34 PM
3

Well, imagine if the best way to deal with contract fraud was to sign no more contracts with the perpetrator (note that marriage itself is a contract), or that the best way to deal with shoplifters was to ban them from the stores. The perpetrator would still be likely to harm other victims, not just by cheating, but by committing other acts that only a ruthlessly hedonistic mind could carry out. By contrast, placing the perpetrator in prison would keep them from causing further harm, and ideally…
/r/MensRights15/09/12 07:18 PM
1

The words "liberal troll" now come to my mind, actually.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 06:40 PM
-2

Here's an example in the US: http://www.jerrykopel.com/c/Adultery-is-not-a-crime.htm "Any man or woman who shall live together in an open state of adultery or fornication, or adultery and fornication, every such man and woman shall be indicted, and on conviction shall be fined in any sum not exceeding two hundred dollars each or imprisoned in the county jail not exceeding six months. This offense shall be sufficiently proved by circumstances which raise the presumption of cohabitation and unlawf…
/r/MensRights15/09/12 05:39 PM
2

Adultery was decriminalized. We need to criminalize it again. It's as simple as that.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 05:25 PM
2

To be honest, it would increase the street credibility of some singers and increase their sales, whereas "domestic violence against women" is likely to discourage some customers.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 08:20 PM
-1

This is why it helps to videotape people with hidden cameras, especially when you're about to discuss sensitive matters with them. It's your house, so it should be legal. Incidentally, I've been wondering whether women behave so exploitatively because they've embraced feminism (just as Chinese children behaved in very cruel ways when they embraced the Cultural Revolution) or whether they're born as entitlement princesses and simply act according to their natures.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 08:11 PM
3

Both the authors and the audience of Jezebel are evil and deserve to be brought to justice. To do otherwise would mean letting them leave a trail of misery in their wake. Censorship obscures rather than exposing them, however.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 11:21 AM
1

If, given her experiences and all other information she possesses, she has concluded in good faith that all men are evil, then there are no grounds to condemn her for that belief, and people should work towards presenting her with evidence to the contrary rather than booing her down (which is itself something to condemn). Misandry and misogyny are empty words, in any case. What matters is why people believe they things they believe, or why they have chosen the emotions they have chosen. Some att…
/r/MensRights13/09/12 11:17 AM
2

Agreed. I am against trolling altogether.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 10:14 PM
1

You mean "in a world with norms and values", but I understand. It does seem to me (from scant experiences, admittedly) that feminists are more friendly with me now than they used to be, though I suspect they might be facetous or simply aware of their movement's eventual defeat.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 09:37 AM
3

How about, instead, not arguing with feminists at all and just informing the general public, especially the male public (which is sane enough to be okay with being proven wrong) until the whole public walks away from the feminists and leaves them in a cesspool of their own resentment?
/r/MensRights12/09/12 09:05 AM
2

The police won't side with anyone if they don't know about it.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 09:31 PM
0

It's a bit more complicated than that. If women automatically accept, say, only 20% of all men (in any particular set of circumstances), then they automatically reject 80% of all men. In knowingly doing this, they condemn 40% of the western world's population to remain childless (unless they can obtain artificial wombs) as well as sexually unsatisfied (which might not be that much of a problem if you can produce children - but I've never been in that situation). Worse yet, they will happily deny…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 07:35 PM
11

Yep. It's almost as bad if they rely on feminism without necessarily espousing it.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 09:17 PM
3

Physical abuse is already a crime in every country I am aware of, and with the advent of inexpensive recording devices, remedies for psychological abuse could also arise. Anyone who wanted to mistreat their spouse in order to get better divorce terms or force them to stay in the marriage would, in the presence of suitable laws, find themselves imprisoned and open to at-fault divorce. No-fault divorce does allow for innocent victims to escape, but in setting no standard of evidence and giving hug…
/r/MensRights10/09/12 06:15 PM
17

I would also be grateful for an example. I'm planning on making a long YouTube video on romantic relationships and how feminism has poisoned them, and wish to bring up the misandry in women's magazines.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 10:56 PM
10

You left out the part where she tells you to go live in the Middle East, just after mentioning your white, cisgendered, male self.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 10:52 PM
-1

You do realize that this is exactly the sort of thing militant atheists, feminists and other ideologues say when their nastiness is called out. If you believe what I say is wrong, go ahead and argue against it, but do so in a spirit of goodwill. I am open to reasonable discussion with reasonable people from which they want everyone to better understand things, and this cannot become one of these discussions due to the attitude you display.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 10:22 PM
1

It's jarring that, even on this subreddit, people deny this. Thankfully, they affirm it in real life. This is one example: http://www.thelocal.se/36946/20111025/ In a survey conducted by the Swedish family lifestyle website familjeliv.se, 45 percent of mothers indicated they wanted to be housewives. Mind you, this comes with all of the biases of a survey, but it's informative that a lot of women (perhaps a small majority) would rather take on traditional roles.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 08:14 PM
7

If she uses Windows, you might still be able to get access to her laptop if she has enough space on her hard drive that hasn't been assigned an operating system yet, by installing a linux distribution on a new partition. I used to have a dual OS setup with ubuntu / windows 7 (windows 7 came pre-installed) and could read all my windows 7 files from ubuntu. Even if that wouldn't work, I suspect there are easy ways to read her files without needing to learn her password; once you do that, there are…
/r/MensRights08/09/12 06:14 PM
1

I agree that this could be a solution. However, the problem is that, once women are domesticated, they are still evil at heart, and if the necessary conditions arise, feminism will resurface. I believe in fighting against evil, even latent evil, and so I believe in opposing women even if they have been conditioned to not follow their natures. I couldn't actually get myself to have sex or start a family with a woman who would, if left to her own devices, ruin me and every other good man out there…
/r/MensRights08/09/12 08:33 AM
-1

No, it's not a troll post. Decent men who have seen the evil actions of women time and time again would suggest getting rid of women, because it's the right thing to do. You do not understand the meaning of justice and so you cannot understand this. I hope you get the wife you deserve.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 08:21 AM
1

No, apologies. The blog I was mentioning is not Angry Harry's website - just a little text on morality with three posts so far.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 11:50 PM
0

That's why we need morality that stands the test of science, that makes none of the inconvenient cosmological assumptions religion can be rebuked for. I would very much like to write about morality and how to bring it back into the modern world on my blog, but was worried that people would not be interested. What do you think?
/r/MensRights07/09/12 09:43 PM
0

Keep these insults out of here, troll.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 09:10 PM
5

The problem is that women are born like this, and cannot outgrow this. They cannot be taught to care about men. If we men are to live happy lives, pursuing the effort of building a family without having to please the female chimp-brain through domineering and abusive behaviour, we need to find a way to reduce the autonomy of women. In the future, I foresee that artificial wombs will remove this problem altogether (indeed, women will be crawling and wailing for a chance to mate with actual men), …
/r/MensRights07/09/12 09:06 PM
-1

Yes, it's 100% true. Look up hypergamy, shit-testing and soft harems. Women couldn't give a damn about 4/5 of all men and only treat us as tools when they can get away with it.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 08:19 PM
2

I would love to see (or run) a "women are not special snowflakes" campaign that taught men not to care about women more than they care about their fellow men. It would perhaps teach people not to give in to female manipulation.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 08:16 PM
2

Many feminists will cringe at such blatant emotional manipulation. No, I don't believe any feminists would.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 08:14 PM
2

I upvoted, but this study is, unfortunately, only available for people in the US.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:25 PM
2

You've got the wrong attitude, but I agree. Institutions are notorious for covering up for themselves by invoking "experts" that they themselves assign and setting up "internal procedures" that are designed to suppress and discourage the victim. Here's one of the worst perpetrators I know, the University of Newcastle (Australia), which is undergoing a parliamentary inquiry: http://bulliedacademics.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/the-bullies-of-academia-and-suicide.html
/r/MensRights06/09/12 12:15 PM
2

Agreed; but if she had evidence, I see nothing wrong with his prison sentence being extended, for instance. I still think someone like that shouldn't go around living, simply for the threat he posed.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 12:59 AM
1

No, unless it's said in bad faith. If it's said in good faith, I would probably be curious about what she finds creepy about me and thus learn to be less creepy from then on.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 12:57 AM
-6

Antonio Cosme Velasco Soriano, 69, had been sent to jail for nine years in 1998, but was let out on a three-day pass and returned to his home town of Benejúzar, 30 miles south of Alicante, on the Costa Blanca. While there, he passed his victim's mother in the street and allegedly taunted her about the attack. He is said to have called out "How's your daughter?", before heading into a crowded bar. That ought to be treated as a crime in and of itself. He deserved it.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 10:37 PM
6

Who says this is a particularly intellectual and intelligent culture?
/r/MensRights03/09/12 10:30 PM
2

I'm not going to downvote this, but honestly, if a fairly liberal woman were told this, she would probably giggle.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 07:41 PM
2

Those who are evil do so; those who are good do not. I would very much like a society in which you could have someone face a legal penalty if they propositioned you for adultery when they had full knowledge that it was adultery. This would solve many such problems.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 12:35 PM
-2

Getting married and wearing a wedding ring would solve that. Heck, if most people got married in their early 20s, it would solve both the issue of people approaching you and their own need for your response.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 04:05 PM
1

You lose the nagging princess but win at life.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 03:56 PM
3

Well, "society" won't be attending. I also think you're mixing up society with the mainstream media, and even there, the feminist monopoly on discourse is being broken. It would be great if you could make it.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 03:05 PM
0

The women who do this are scum (even if they're 90% of the female population, they're still scum because of their actions).
/r/MensRights02/09/12 02:51 PM
2

If someone lies to me, I want to punch them in the face, particularly if their lie caused me to keep loving them and ultimately suffer rejection. Lying protects no one's feelings except the perpetrator's.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 02:50 PM
1

This is not the kind of comment I would expect from a moderator, especially a mens' rights moderator. You may as well be telling me that I am a loser who lives in his parents' basement and can't get laid, i.e. standard feminist fare.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 11:08 AM
2

Good to know there is such an applet; I contemplated making one like it a year ago but didn't have the time for it. Now, if only you could also select other people to alert, so that your friends could come over if they're nearby. It would also be useful for neighbourhood watch groups.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 09:02 AM
0

I'm anti-liberal, anti-militant-atheism (while being an atheist) and anti-gay-"rights"(i.e. gay interests)-lobbying. I belive people have the right and should have the freedom to do good, but not the right or, ideally, the freedom, to do evil. Liberalism is an oximoron - you have to suppress good individuals, who have morals, in order to feel good about yourself if you don't have them yourself; you have to keep them from forming their own communities, from seeking legal defenses against adultery…
/r/MensRights02/09/12 08:59 AM
2

I'm happy to help out with room and board. There is also a website / blog where we could post details - http://mensrightsnetwork.wordpress.com/ . The only issue is that barbaric hordes of feminists might descend upon us. I'm perfectly happy to fend them off, though. One thing I would really love is a globe app to allow people to search for groups in their particular cities. If anyone knows of one, please suggest it.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 07:29 PM
1

You can't tell if the accusation is false or not, but I do agree that, unfortunately, people shouldn't argue that it is true or false until the end of the investigation unless they were privvy to further evidence.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 06:46 PM
1

A wonderful article, though it's worth emphasizing that the collusion of ordinary women with feminists has been passive, rather than active. They were happy to sit by and receive the benefits while letting the exploitation of innocent men take place; which still makes them complicit to the divorce culture, paternity fraud, combat dating, one-sided domestic abuse support and all other feminist societal ills.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 12:14 PM
2

This growth may be related to the new poster campaigns. I look forward to seeing more. Also, one needs to bear in mind that this trend may eventually follow a sigmoid curve.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 11:28 AM
1

I don't believe many people know what gender feminism even is. It might be more convenient, if more banal, to phrase it as "Feminists claim that feminism is about equality. How would you respond to such a claim?"
/r/MensRights01/09/12 11:15 AM
2

I assume they give the mean, not the median, response rate. If they were to give the median, we would most likely see a far lower response rate for men, simply because, as has already been pointed out, a lot of women are hypergamists.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 11:05 AM
1

My mother doesn't want my father to be blamed for the abuse he inflicted on her until a few years ago (this is the only reason why he is not in prison). Feminism may have contributed to the state of affairs in this article, but there are far more ponderous psychological factors at play.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 11:32 AM
2

The scary thing is that he does mean it. Obama was raised by a single mother; his wife (in her own words) got together with him because he "was useful", and she has berated him on (IIRC live) television: when both he and she were asked whether they had any complaints about their spouse, he claimed to have none, whereas she stated there was plenty for her to complain about. This is a pure-blooded mangina.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 08:51 AM
2

If you want me to reply to your posts in the future, please be civil and honestly strive to identify the truth. In this case, not being aware of what I have read on the subject, you claim that what I have read does not even exist.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 07:49 PM
2

And when I pointed out how racist he was he said that it's impossible for non-white people to be racist because racism requires power. I look forward to him experiencing the power of several black thugs in a bad neighbourhood. This is why I don't believe in "power" or see it as a scalar quantity: it's situational.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 07:25 PM
1

This is a very interesting point. I know a compelling case has been made that nazism, i.e. national socialism (as the nazis themselves called it), shares many traits with communism, i.e. international socialism. Whereas nazism undertakes racial warfare, communism undertakes class warfare (or claims to).
/r/MensRights30/08/12 07:20 PM
1

What the teacher said is also sexist. It's a common feminist strategy to deny an accusation by performing an act that epitomizes the very thing they are accused of. In this case, your teacher said something sexist to deny that one of her former claims is sexist. This presumably serves to shock and confuse the victim, as well as make them feel that they will suffer more of the abuse they are protesting against if they choose to continue the conversation. It's what people with cluster B personalit…
/r/MensRights30/08/12 07:13 PM
1

I intentionally linked to the mensactivism.org commentary to increase the site's profile. By the way, I'm surprised that the article didn't call prof. Hampikian on his junk science. To suggest that half the person's DNA is irrelevant because of the weight it has in the original cell makes me cringe.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 07:00 PM
4

You left out a "cis".
/r/MensRights30/08/12 01:56 PM
11

"It takes a lot for a man to admit his own weaknesses (there's a chapter on how women tolerate pain better), " As someone who did research on this, I know that the statement in parantheses is false. Women are actually more easily sensitized to pain, meaning that if they are struck twice in the same place, the increase in pain intensity is higher for women than for men. There are no gender differences in initial reported pain sensation as far as I am aware, though I could be wrong on that. EDIT: …
/r/MensRights28/08/12 05:12 PM
1

You know, my father (who was abusive towards the whole family when he could not get away with it) would have probably been an SRSer. It's important to recognize that these people do inflict suffering wherever they can and deserve to spend their lives in prison for it.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 10:09 AM
1

Thank you very much for this.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 12:50 AM
1

Dear dr. Koetsier, I have recently read an article published by prof. Greg Hampikian in the New York Times, entitled "Men, Who Needs Them?". I could go over the misconceptions raised in it, such as the suggestion that paternal DNA provides an insignificant contribution to a zygote's identity due to its small mass - even though it really is almost half the DNA, and far more significant in its development than, say, the cell membrane. However, I wish to express my concern over the overall message …
/r/MensRights27/08/12 12:48 AM
0

Greg Hampikian Professor, Department of Biological Sciences Joint appointment in Department of Criminal Justice Director of the Idaho Innocence Project We need to fix this deep, deep mess.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 12:38 AM
2

I agree that you shouldn't back down. If you get caught by surprise, it's still perfectly valid to refuse to engage in that particular fight and prepare a new, more favourable battleground with your enemy.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 10:20 AM
10

The problem with "getting another cop", though, is that people at police stations know each other and are likely to have the same level of corruption. So on top of that, I would advise: "film your encounter with the next officers, ideally with multiple hidden cameras".
/r/MensRights26/08/12 10:17 AM
4

I would normally ignore such a piece simply because of how fallacious it is. And yet while the term “mammal” is based on an objective analysis of shared traits, the genus name for human beings, Homo, reflects an 18th-century masculine bias in science. "Homo" means "human", "person" and is gender neutral.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 09:28 PM
3

oh this girl has naked pictures of her hairy pits, man-hater, ignore. Pits or GTFO. (sorry, couldn't resist.)
/r/MensRights24/08/12 04:08 PM
1

Sorry, I didn't mean to reply to your last post in the thread, but to this: Looks like you're not a fan of Dr.F's show. He's been doing this for a while. Tune in and listen. Though you better leave your trolling here on reddit -- Dr.F has been known to unfurl his incredibly long penis at trolls and feminists and whirling it about like a propeller on an everglade skimmer. Does Dr. F genuinely have a website / vlog somewhere, or is this just a metaphor?
/r/MensRights24/08/12 03:31 PM
1

I upvoted the thread but not the post. "insecure" and "butthurt" are not terms you want to use when trying to sympathize with - not just understand - your audience. I grew up in an abusive family. My father was the primary abuser, my mother was the abuse enabler. I would always try to be supportive of my mother, who behaved as a weak, helpless victim that nevertheless ignored that the abuse was going on and wanted me to ignore it as well. She was protective of my father, who was a complete scumb…
/r/MensRights24/08/12 03:15 PM
1

Could you please provide a link?
/r/MensRights24/08/12 01:47 PM
3

Listen to how she giggles and helps him post his message. She definitely approves of it, and only becomes concerned (or perhaps skeptical) when he mentions how the MRAs are "raping her time". If this were me, I would be gently arguing against the views he presents from the very beginning.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 01:46 PM
0

It's important to note the description of the business world and how its immorality appears to be reflected in the day-to-day lives of its members. Any slut will be a hypocrite, which partly explains the denial encountered in previous eras. This also needs to be emphasized: The women wanted to study or hang out with friends or just be “100 percent selfish,” as one said. “I have the rest of my life to devote to a husband or kids or my job.” Some even purposely had what one might think of as fake …
/r/MensRights24/08/12 12:59 PM
4

Isn't the suffix "anthrope"? As in, "philanthropist" rather than "philtropist"? Just a minor correction.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 12:23 PM
0

It's not how attractive you are, but your facial expression and tone of voice can indicate whether or not you spontaneously generate certain emotions as a response to certain events, and this is something that (to my knowledge) cannot be faked.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 09:08 AM
2

Not sure about everyone else, but just by looking at their facial expressions, I found the man far more trustworthy than the girl.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 09:07 AM
10

I 100% agree with this. Have you posted a copy in the article's comments section, by any chance?
/r/MensRights23/08/12 05:15 PM
9

It's my (admittedly meager) experience that student unions cater to ultra-left-wing politics. They receive money from national organizations with which to campaign on leftist issues, for instance, and your union would certainly not like to run out of money by "offending" the feminists.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 05:12 PM
3

There's another issue - to my understanding, if he went to Sweden, the trial would be carried out in secret.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 04:49 PM
10

I did think the term "moderate" wasn't very strongly supported by the evidence, but they are certainly asking for a sensible approach to Assange's case, which is a beautiful rarity.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 02:51 PM
15

Two things of note: On the other hand, Assange is dealt with by much of the media as if he were guilty, though he has not even been charged. It is not for us to decide whether or not the allegations are true and whether what happened amounts to rape or sexual violence – we don't have all the facts and what has been said so far has not been tested. But we do know that rape victims' right to anonymity and defendants' right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty are both crucial to a just judi…
/r/MensRights23/08/12 01:40 PM
1

It's worth bearing in mind that another wiki, http://mensrights101.wikidot.com/ is being developed. It's currently only a link / quote farm at this stage, though I hope it will progress nicely over the next several months.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 12:52 AM
2

Apparently not. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women's_suffrage#Turkey
/r/MensRights22/08/12 04:11 PM
2

To be honest, any intelligent individual will be able to consider the possibility of male victims and realize just how fraudulent the "women's officer" is.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 04:07 PM
2

Evil natures.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 04:06 PM
1

You mean it's "too late" to persuade someone about feminism because they talk about people as "employer apologists"? This is genuinely a problem, as HR nearly always sides with the management during allegations of bullying regardless of who is right.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 09:13 AM
1

It also happens in criminal cases, as with the colorado killing spree by James Holmes.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 07:19 PM
-3

What is intrinsically wrong with violence? What's so bad about it? If you're bothered by the fact that it causes harm, well, that's a good thing if you apply it against evil individuals, and in doing so, destroy them.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 04:54 PM
3

The PC solution also leaves out the fact that the girlfriend will then do the same to other men because the man was too PC to stop her.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 04:52 PM
7

As someone who was abused throughout his childhood and adolescence because my mother (the abuse enabler) wanted to protect my father (the narcissistic abuser) from his own actions, I can safely say that these people are right. No one should ever support anyone who has been abusive towards them. Compassion and mercy are wonderful when presented to people who have earned them. Handed out gratuitously, they are nothing but abuse enabling.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 04:00 PM
-1

I see the same malice in this man as I do in feminist atheists.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 12:37 AM
1

It's not always despair. If the person hoping she'll change her mind is an idealist and aspires to develop an objectively ideal character, he will reason that this woman should eventually, through the application of moral reasoning, recognize that he is a good person and worth loving. Unfortunately, if she's not a good person herself, this never happens.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 12:27 AM
4

I have met such people (biological adults, mind you) in real life. They start harrassing you soon after you do something faith-related or go against their creeds, which typically include liberal feminism.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 11:38 PM
0

I know women who post much more amusing jokes about women on facebook. This video just shows a poor comedian. Speaking of which, there's one about the exhausted woman finding two signs next to each other in the middle of the desert. One says "two miles east to oasis". The other says "Gucci 80% off, twenty miles west". Guess which way she crawls.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 01:18 AM
4

I recommend another song.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 12:47 AM
1

Sorry I haven't been doing much work on it; life has been tough for me. I'll try to get the rest of the article links ported from the subreddit tomorrow.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 12:52 AM
25

It may be worthwhile to buy a hidden camera if you anticipate meeting her again. You might be able to get evidence concerning the theft and physical abuse. Naturally, if she punches you again and you record it, you make the situation very favourable. Also, look up psychopathy. Your girlfriend might be a psychopath.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 12:46 AM
3

The thugs might actually attack the embassy. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-19259623
/r/MensRights15/08/12 10:27 PM
5

I'm not sure if it's because of recent events (GWW being harrassed by atheists, this particular comment on NPR) or simply because of a positive feedback loop caused by people posting MR-related ideas on the web. You may recall that the men's rights magazine produced by Factory started off with only a thousand-odd views on its first issue and got roughly 100,000 within several issues.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 10:02 PM
1

Apologies, I was making a rather crude joke.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 10:35 PM
0

Where by "water", you mean "sludge".
/r/MensRights14/08/12 10:31 AM
1

That seems like an interesting way to stifle negative reactions, or at least, make it seem that they don't exist.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 11:55 PM
1

These "lovely young women" make up for their horrible social skills and ugliness with gobloads of narcissism. Dating them will only make you more miserable until you realize that it's not your standards that are the problem, it's women's lack of morality.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 09:35 PM
-3

Only if you think fraud is okay and don't care about the victim's suffering.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 07:56 PM
5

Olympic and World Championship competition is not open to men, but other international and national competitions allow male competitors. Both USA Synchro and Synchro Canada allow men to compete with women. – Most European countries allow men to compete also, France even allows male only podiums, according to the number of participants. In the past decade more men are becoming involved in the sport and a global biannual competition called Men's Cup has been steadily growing. According to this Wik…
/r/MensRights12/08/12 07:51 PM
1

Recriminalizing adultery and ending no-fault divorce would go a long way to solving this problem. Could you please post the source? Also, you might want to know about this blog, whose author would no doubt like to include this in his collection: http://unknownmisandry.blogspot.co.uk/
/r/MensRights12/08/12 05:47 PM
3

I will be quoting this phrase often. EDIT: It's obvious from EpicJ's links that the teams really do want to compete, but are barred from it. Perhaps we should have a letter-writing campaign for the International Olympic Committee and FINA (as well as members of the Brazilian parliament). I will start an AVAAZ petition for this.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 05:03 PM
2

Yep. Direct democracy is a lot more sensible than a representative democracy.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 01:08 PM
1

Niceness is not necessarily a weakness and I am happy to be nice to good people. The key word here is good. If they're not good, don't help them. If they're evil, treat them accordingly: work with other good people to find the means to obliterate them, to ensure that they do not cause any more suffering to any good people.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 10:11 AM
6

Anyone who steps over you if you let them is scum and deserves to be treated accordingly.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 09:41 AM
-4

I agree that they shouldn't have defended her automatically, but I really wish this anti-violence rethoric would stop. Acts of violence are utilitarian, they are neither inherently good nor inherently evil. It's the motive underlying them that makes them one or the other.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 08:30 AM
5

It's far more common for feminists and nasty women to feel contempt for men rather than genuine hatred.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 11:28 PM
2

For those of you who are new to men's rights, there has been a trend for companies to revise their anti-male policies, notably in the wake of successful lawsuits: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airline_sex_discrimination_policy_controversy
/r/MensRights10/08/12 11:03 PM
1

Read about psychopaths. There is no cure for psychopathy and all they can do with friendliness is exploit it. Being grumpy or angry is not being evil - evil is about taking pleasure in suffering, about degrading and humiliating, deceiving and perverting, coercing for the sake of experiencing "power" etc.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 10:49 PM
0

You will find that the majority of people who have lived with evil individuals, and have not enabled them, will attest that their evil character was inborn. If evil is indeed inborn, then fighting and killing evil individuals, as opposed to tolerating them, is what stops the cycle.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 07:00 AM
10

The Independent is a traditionally left-wing newspaper, which makes this news particularly good.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 11:45 PM
-2

It felt very sad for me to see these people throw away their dignity like this.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 06:32 PM
2

I politely disagree with your use of the term "article".
/r/MensRights07/08/12 04:30 PM
2

Or, rather, of the fact that one needs to collaborate with a multitude of other sensible people in order to topple evil institutions.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 02:51 AM
1

As others have stated, Erin Pizzey is a wonderful woman and I am very grateful that she exists in the world.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 02:49 AM
1

I thought that people might be bothered by it, though I really wish everyone accepted that talking about horrible things in an informative or otherwise productive manner is not horrible at all.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 09:04 AM
1

How would people feel about "sick of this trash yet" or "sick of this stuff yet"?
/r/MensRights03/08/12 05:42 PM
2

To be more specific, Erin Pizzey left after learning that her feminist group was planning a bomb attack on a high-street clothing store, IIRC because it supposedly promoted sexism.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 10:37 PM
2

A good solution, but the problem is that she will continue to do it to other men, some of whom may well be vulnerable for a variety of reasons.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 02:14 AM
3

I would like to thank all the people who downvoted your post for the psychological help they offered. Now, if only we could have legal support to go along with that.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 08:54 PM
2

This is true. I was shit-tested many times before, often by women who didn't seem to be evil on first glance, and potential romantic interests routinely turned their backs on me on hearing of my history of abuse. I also notice women on occasion who seem to be attempting to shit-test me as a means to assess whether they ought to show romantic interest. Incidentally, I have yet to encounter a full-blown shit-test again, but when I do, I will say this. "Madam, I must now introduce you to Primaloath…
/r/MensRights30/07/12 08:45 PM
14

Deception is not a privilege, it's an act of evil and deserves opposition.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 12:06 PM
1

I was abused by both parents. Yeah, she deserves jail. You might be struggling and confused for a while, but your understanding of right and wrong is still native to you. It's just that your parent hijacked it for her own selfish reasons, using both your natural tendency to love and honour as well as your natural need for attachment against you. The truth is, you still have the power to think objectively, as well as to perform objective moral reasoning and feel the right things for those who gen…
/r/MensRights30/07/12 11:07 AM
11

Precisely. Any woman who treats someone like dirt "as a test", then treats them even worse if they try to do the sane and decent thing of reconciling with her, does not deserve anyone's love or marriage and should most certainly not be in the business of raising children. Heck, if it's illegal to punch a girl after she does this, there should probably be legal remedies against shit-testing, in the same way as with any other form of psychological abuse.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 10:20 AM
1

Thanks. I did think the state should have pressed charges in this case but didn't know what to call the two types of offenses.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 01:01 PM
1

What if several kinds of marriage existed -for instance, "faithful marriage" and "open marriage"? That's certainly an option, but I can't see adding more paperwork and bureaucracy to an already inefficient government would be a very good expenditure of taxpayer money. A marriage contract that protects against infidelity and frivolous divorce would make some people (myself included) very reassured and allow us to cultivate happy marriages. Quite a few people's lives are destroyed by infidelity an…
/r/MensRights27/07/12 12:59 PM
1

I support this, but I'm not in the US. I also believe the petition should describe the law in more detail (for instance, the reason Wanetta Gibson is not facing charges is because Brian Banks is not pressing charges) and state the specific intended solutions. However, I'll sign it to encourage future work if you can confirm that it's fine for people outside the US to do so.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 10:12 PM
1

The only place where I saw this sort of thing proposed frequently was an atheist community. It struck me that the people there derived some perverse pleasure from ridiculing. I believe this person is evil and simply seeks to cause suffering for his own hideous pleasure.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 09:02 PM
2

Okay, if someone commits plagiarism and credit card fraud, lies blatantly on national television and runs a ponzi scheme, do you think they're likely to be a good parent? If someone betrays those who are loyal to them and pursues self-interest ruthlessly, do you think they're likely to be a good parent? All of these actions are similar in nature, because they spring from the same sort of mind. The reality is that parents who cheat just aren't good people.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 08:50 PM
2

Cheating is by definition not consensual. You and your partner agreed not to screw around, and she did. By doing so, she revealed the nature of your whole relationship, from the time it started to the present moment, to be something to which you had never consented. The same goes for fraud in the general sense (but, as stated below, I can't see how consent has anything to do with rights as you define them, since they are all derived from "the right to live"). I can't see why it bothers you if tw…
/r/MensRights26/07/12 08:45 PM
3

I expected someone to say that. I spent the good part of ten years planning to help my mother get out of an abusive relationship with her husband (which had destroyed my entire childhood and adolescence, and which she had willingly remained in) and come to terms with the life she was living, while she self-destructively treated me as her little puppet in order to squeeze some emotional gratification out of me. When I finally became financially stable, in spite of the turmoil I was experiencing f…
/r/MensRights26/07/12 08:14 PM
-3

I disagree. It's important for people to be aware of the difference between sacrificing their life for a good person and squandering it for a bad one. I say this from experience.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 02:53 AM
2

It infringes on my right to live free of fraud and betrayal, on my right to safely trust people to do what they have agreed to do. Incidentally, all rights that I am aware of are grounded in some form of morality, be it vague or well-defined. They are not pulled out of thin air.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 02:50 AM
-4

I do believe that morals are as easy as good vs. evil. I also know that hypocrisy is evil; I will never dishonor myself by helping a woman who has not proven herself.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 02:34 AM
0

For the sake of all good children, criminalize adultery.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 07:08 PM
1

I know there is a mirror of the Daily Mail for people who don't want to provide it with ad revenue. I wonder if the same could be done with Jezebel. I would happily pay for the upkeep costs.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 06:07 PM
-1

There are perfectly good reasons to kill certain kinds of people. If someone, by nature, enjoys causing suffering and would feel great discomfort with the idea of being helpful (people like that do exist), you know that they would always go about causing suffering if left without appropriate constraints, and you also know that they would always struggle to break free of these constraints if you did impose them. This is simply because people attempt to do the things they like (or, if they have a …
/r/MensRights25/07/12 04:30 PM
-1

I don't see ideas as attacking people, and so I don't see any reason to defend against them. Ideas are ideas, they are either true or false, they don't have any volition and so don't set out to harm people. If people present certain ideas with certain motivations, such as to cause suffering, then the people in question are evil, but that does not say whether or not the ideas they present are evil themselves. For instance, if someone points out that I have a bad character trait and starts laughin…
/r/MensRights25/07/12 01:54 PM
-2

...So you want me to die in a hole, and that doesn't make you yourself evil, emotionally damaged etc? It seems to me that you are not prepared to live by your own standards.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 09:46 AM
-1

There is a subtle difference between wanting to hurt people for instrumental purposes and wanting to hurt them as an end result, i.e. because one enjoys causing suffering. If you carry out the former, then it matters whether or not the people in question are innocent or evil themselves. If you carry out the latter, your actions are unquestionably evil. I would not object to maiming and killing, say, someone like Ted Bundy in order to prevent him / her from doing evil. I would also not object to …
/r/MensRights25/07/12 09:43 AM
0

Not so. Here's my interpretation of good and evil, based on judging people's intents: All intents that can be perpetually fulfilled by all agents possessing them (e.g. love, understanding, justice), subject to circumstances unrelated to these agents (e.g. the availability of infromation from the non-sentient world), are good. Intents that cannot be perpetually fulfilled by all agents possessing them (e.g. competition for limited resources) are not necessarily good. Now, intents that are fulfille…
/r/MensRights25/07/12 08:16 AM
3

She looks and sounds narcissistic; notably because of the fact that she posts numerous completely pointless pictures of herself and brags for no real purpose. I'm afraid the only cure for her (and relief for her potential victims) is death.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 07:25 AM
1

That's the point - psychological abuse is not currently regarded as a crime. Someone could exploit, manipulate, ridicule, insult, publically humiliate you and generally play mind games that leave you a wreck, and he/she would not receive prison time because there's no crime for which to get him/her imprsioned. This seriously needs to change.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 03:41 PM
-17

Calling for genocide against men may be wrong, but it isn't necessarily evil - not if the person who calls for it genuinely regards the genocide itself as a triumph against evil. I thoroughly disagree with the idea of genocide against men, but it doesn't bother me when people advocate for it if their motives are innocent, and I say this being a man. Frankly, I know that if someone thinks I'm evil and wants me dead, I can simply prove to that person that I'm not evil, provided they are fully capa…
/r/MensRights24/07/12 03:35 PM
3

Thank you very much for sharing this. It really means a lot to me.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 12:29 AM
11

My own experience of a breakup with an evil woman involved her going back and forth between me and her friends, discussing the state of our "relationship" with me (as I was calmly trying to sort out what the problems were and how they might be mended), then loudly presenting made-up complaints about this discussion to them. Heroes that they were, they all "stood up" for her. I even asked them what exactly I had done that bothered her, and one of them angrily replied by saying that whether I had …
/r/MensRights23/07/12 10:43 PM
0

It is how being a hero works. Heroically sacrificing yourself for evil individuals who actively seek to inflict suffering or cover up for those who do is a horrible mistake. Heroically sacrificing yourself for those who couldn't care less about good and evil is also a mistake, albeit a lesser one. In the end, you're supposed to do good, and you don't do this by helping those who only have self-interest and/or causing suffering on their minds.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 12:44 PM
1

You can supposedly culk, i.e. bulk and cut at the same time, i.e. get bigger muscles along with fat as well as lose that fat at the rate at which it's being created. Here's one thread on the topic: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=136516011&page=1 I know that, for me (and I only weigh 85 kilos due to difficulties that have kept me out of the gym for years), staying at the right amount of body fat is easy. I simply eat a lot most of the time, and reduce my calorie intake when I noti…
/r/MensRights23/07/12 10:23 AM
-48

If I may give some patronizing advice to Seth: unless he's doing something noble like fighting against an evil police state (which I assume he isn't), he should seriously stop breaking the law. This is still an evil thing for that woman to do.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 10:12 AM
-9

We do need valor and heroism. This isn't valor and heroism unless the women in question deserved it, though.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 08:45 PM
4

"A-ha-ha-ha, you're disposable!" No good person would do that. When it's common for people to laugh about this sort of thing, it's a serious problem.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 03:05 PM
1

Make sure this isn't construed as cyberbullying. She could always use the law against you. I imagine that talking to other people about her is fine, as is writing an anonymous expose on her, but I know of one case (from lovefraud.com) where the psychopath sued the person exposing him online and won - although there were certain irregularities with the case that make me wonder whether the judge was the psychopath's friend.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 11:49 AM
1

I had to downvote this. If there is any ideal or value associated with circumcision, I am not seeing it. Plus, the fact that it's been practiced for aeons makes no difference - what matters is whether it's good or evil.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 10:47 AM
2

The article is not worth commenting on.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 09:58 AM
1

Why does this article blame men for everything? Look, it's not that "asking for help is unmanly". It's that you find a lot of people who don't give a damn about you and would rather unjustly support a woman than justly support a man. It's not because a man "doesn't recognize the problem", but because they know that a lot of people are going to hate and oppose them for striving towards a solution. This is at the heart of the matter. No one in the mainstream media is saying anything about female-o…
/r/MensRights16/07/12 09:24 AM
0

People here are saying "don't seek revenge" without really understanding the difference between revenge and justice. You certainly don't want her, and people like her, to get away with this sort of betrayal, and it's perfectly reasonable to want to expose people like this in order to prevent them from causing further harm and protect potential victims from falling into similar situations. I know there are many ways you could go against her, including illegal ones. Maybe she has some sort of incr…
/r/MensRights12/07/12 02:39 AM
1

I am perfectly okay with taking action against trolling and have never engaged in ridicule since I was old enough to know better. Reasoned, well-intentioned discourse is an altogether different matter.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 11:45 PM
1

I appreciate the effort to fight against abuse in all its forms, including trolling, but it does seem, as has been pointed out, that several of the moderators are themselves trolls (perhaps having infected the group). I_AM_FEMINIST is one noteworthy example.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 09:57 AM
6

I would encourage her to apply both factual and moral reasoning earnestly; to explore all possibile situations, from as many perspectives as possible, and consider all the effects of her actions; to be honest and just, to be good and to oppose evil wherever the opportunity presents itself; to feel curious and constantly strive to improve her understanding of the truth; to genuinely love and welcome genuine love; to question herself and others objectively, but never put the will of others, no mat…
/r/MensRights05/07/12 11:40 PM
-16

Having dealt with militant atheists, I can vouch for the fact that most of them are trolls. It's a good outcome that some atheists are rebuking feminism, though it does not stem from anyone's good nature.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 11:18 PM
1

Okay. “Hi, I’m Ryan. You seem pretty cool. Hope I don’t have to write anything too crazy to get your attention considering we barely know >anything about each other.” Well, Ryan, considering you were wearing a Native American headdress in your photo…you’re right, you don’t need to write anything too crazy. I already know I don’t want to know anything more about you. Screw this self-serving harlot.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 04:55 PM
3

As the modern decline in the white population of the western world shows, the group made a perfectly accurate prediction, however unpleasant you might find its connotations.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 04:11 PM
0

Given that peak oil might hit in the early 2020's, I am genuinely concerned about expending electricity to read that whole article.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 10:25 PM
2

I wonder if these children will learn to do the same in the workplace, e.g. cover up for the bully who happens to be their best mate and intimidate the victims.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 08:43 PM
3

I can count the complaints to an article on men being stupid and to one that derided the violent castration of a man, but there was no withdrawal or apology for either of them. Should only demonstrably successful efforts be listed?
/r/MensRights28/06/12 06:11 PM
0

I am very disappointed with GWW's attempt to suggest that "female choice" led to the birth of civilization and that men were previously regarded as superior for anything other than their genuine physical and volitional strength.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 06:00 PM
2

I unfortunately won't have the time to design more than one website.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 06:21 PM
1

I have actually been thinking about a sort of "good people project", encouraging people who devote themselves to good principles to talk about these principles, how they believe relationships between people should work etc, as a means to spread these principles in the world and help people support each other in their endeavours. A lot of what applies to one gender also applies to the other, but issues like hypergamy are currently not talked about enough. There is a lot of malice, greed, cowardic…
/r/MensRights27/06/12 06:20 PM
2

virtue among women - vote here for this website.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 08:59 AM
19

abuse against men - vote here for this website.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 08:59 AM
1

He forgets the fact that being "unhappy" on surveys can be an instrumental act rather than a genuine assessment. If being unhappy and whining gets certain people what they want in life, part of these people will be unhappy. Overall, regarding his conclusions, I must say that I would much rather have an artificial womb than a narcissistic parasite at my side.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 07:40 AM
2

Funny, I don't respond well to "incentives". I suppose I'm a moral person.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 08:49 PM
1

You need to be aware of the fact that feminists (and leftists in general, as I have found) will pervert administrative procedures for their own ends whenever they can get away with it. An official group for men, with union funding etc, is something they will struggle to prevent from arising, even if they have to come up with the most absurd of administrative excuses to get it rejected. Moral arguments cannot persuade them. They know they're wrong and still do the horrible things they do.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 09:16 PM
0

I upvoted this, though I believe you should note the distinction between differences in how people are treated and differences in how they actually are.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 07:52 PM
6

I stopped reading when it seemed as though she was focused entirely on how the reader deserves everything and can't have it all because of limiting beliefs. This is not what relationships are for. If I interpreted this incorrectly, I do apologize.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 06:59 PM
1

Am I the only one concerned by the act that she shows no real interest in how her actions affect other people?
/r/MensRights21/06/12 03:40 PM
0

I couldn't find any mention in the article about candy and berating boys. If you have experienced this yourself, I urge you to film it next time you come across it, or encourage others to do so.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 10:07 AM
1

By "discussions", you must mean "the teacher's efforts to silence critics".
/r/MensRights20/06/12 09:52 AM
1

I have been in pure agony for my whole life because of my dysfunctional "family" - my lack of real parents and my desperate desire to turn one of them into a real parent (in a fair manner, with me being willing to support them as much as I could). I have sought to form lifelong bonds with many people, male and female, but found women to be almost exclusively self-centered, enjoying being cared for and supported but feeling no obligation to do the same. The only thing that's making things better …
/r/MensRights19/06/12 11:27 AM
1

It damn well is an affront to moral men.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 12:10 AM
-3

If this is "for the whole world to see", it's a shame her name is censored. She could use new facebook friends to help her understand the negative consequences of being a slut.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 11:37 PM
1

To be honest, I agree that I can't seem to recall any misandry in any of the video games I've played, and I've played quite a few.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 09:27 PM
1

This is fantastic news and really deserves more upvotes. However, I suspect the new version of the act is mostly due to increased awareness of the social consequences of fatherlessness after the London Riots in 2011, rather than a greater sympathy towards the fathers themselves.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 11:14 PM
2

I am definitely volunteering for ManKind now.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 10:17 PM
1

Sounds to me like the hypergamous would end up getting raped by bandits. Well, ruining the world certainly felt like a good idea at the time!
/r/MensRights08/06/12 09:32 PM
1

Thank you for the link. It's really heartwarming to know that characteristically feminine vices and evils were being acknowledged before the feminists worked to get them tossed down the memory hole.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 04:23 PM
6

The discussion seems to be focused on parliamentary immunity. I am halfway through the thread (not checking child threads) and only then do people begin seriously discussing the recipients' gender. Apologies if I missed any relevant comments. One post mentions that the attacker became aggressive when the two women called him a fascist. Interesting to note that showing feminists that they are emotional bullies also elicits shaming language from them.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 04:58 PM
2

So, does she care that one partner viewing pornography degrades the other partner, does she care about the way pornography degrades female partners specifically, or does she care about the way it "degrades" women in general? Does she care about people, or does she only care about women? If it's the latter, I would have a long and in-depth discussion with her about how she ought to extend her compassion, assuming that she is not a generally malicious person.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 10:22 PM
5

I do believe that news reports of individual incidents are not always helpful once one has already read a few. However, bear in mind that people new to men's rights occasionally come here, and such stories may be helpful for them. I also believe that it would help for this subreddit to serve as an aggregate for men's rights sites, blogs and video channels, giving people new perspectives. I wholeheartedly recommend that you switch to /r/MRActivism, which is focused on helping people carry out act…
/r/MensRights06/06/12 08:33 PM
1

Note the thread title. The AMA is starting on June 7 12PM.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 06:10 PM
17

I've met two kinds of feminists. The kind that harass, ridicule and attempt to manipulate you for uncovering their lies, and the ones who sit idly by watching them do it, then privately email you saying that they're "worried" about your views (not that they're worried about how their friends have been verbally and emotionally assaulting you!).
/r/MensRights06/06/12 05:57 PM
1

Would you mind if I posted this on my blog? I would of course fully reference it. I just don't want it to get lost in the murky depths of Reddit.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 12:18 PM
3

Dominance is an evil trait. It means you want to coerce people, to compete with them for limited resources, basically to put your urges above those of others, and thus break one of the crucial pillars of morality (the idea that it is context-independent, so that what applies to you also applies to everyone else). If you have it, I pretty much want to shoot you dead, and my desire is then not a manifestation of dominance, but one of justice. A woman who likes dominant men is basically saying that…
/r/MensRights06/06/12 12:07 PM
1

It's not a case of choosing a woman that won't manifest her hypergamy (by being unable to flirt around), it's a case of choosing one that won't have it to begin with - someone who values things that are objectively good rather than social status, which can often be an indicator of a diabolical character. I agree about the woman you mention. I was also a bit troubled by that.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 11:44 AM
2

Two things to note: You cannot court a woman of more than 30 years if you expect her to bear your (healthy) children. It's as simple as that. >30 years, no family whatsoever. Single, homely older women who make more money than me are probably single for a reason, and that reason usually isn't being a victim of divorce / unfavourable circumstances. It may very well be her inability to form a lifelong bond / her choice of a career over romance / being asexual / having NPD or some other horrible pe…
/r/MensRights06/06/12 11:39 AM
1

http://dalrock.wordpress.com/2012/05/25/scientists-observe-the-rationalization-hamster/
/r/MensRights06/06/12 12:25 AM
7

Hypergamy is all about becoming unhappy with your current choice because a better one comes along. There are various kinds of unhappiness and many of them really don't justify breaking up. For instance, there is a difference between "happiness" as in "there are irreparable differences between us and I can spell them out clearly", and "haaapiness" (a la Dalrock) as in "you're not being dominant enough for me, so I'm going to complain until you placate me, which will make you become less dominant …
/r/MensRights06/06/12 12:23 AM
10

Some time ago, I met a woman who thought it was okay to dump a man "if she wasn't happy with him" or "if she found someone she felt more attracted to", and tried to argue (in the classical rationalization hamster format) that it would make him happy as well if she left him. Some of the things she later said, such as that she "had decided to put herself first", that she was "looking for the right man", and importantly that she thought lying (to "protect his feelings") and adultery were okay, prob…
/r/MensRights05/06/12 10:57 PM
-2

Why is it that whenever someone does something constructive for this subreddit, there are a lot more complaints about it than there are words of encouragement and friendly advice? How does this help anyone make any progress?
/r/MensRights05/06/12 07:24 PM
-1

Everyone, I suppose, I just haven't come across any male sluts that I know of. Interesting to see this downvoted. One would think there would be more decent people around this reddit.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 07:33 AM
7

I am grateful for the fact that sites like AVFM exist, but AVFM really seems to have been favouring a crass approach to writing lately. The "wipe your ass with poison ivy" comment was particularly distasteful, and it certainly set the tone for the article later on.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 06:56 AM
-9

I define "slut" as any woman whose sexual behaviour is aimed towards self-gratification or manipulation rather than love. There are plenty of reasons to shame wanton self-interest and manipulation. Sexually promiscuous women are generally so for the above two reasons, which tends to justify slut-shaming in these cases. I am personally attracted to women who are honest, just, considerate etc - having values that women who focus on their sexuality tend not to have.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 08:57 PM
1

Nothing wrong with hitting a woman back.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 08:08 PM
10

Not sure about everyone else, but I am also against feminism because it works to protect criminal, treacherous and irresponsible women from justice as well as making efforts to silence their male victims. The harassment campaign against Erin Pizzey comes to mind.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 07:59 PM
-2

Remind her that certain real men might decide to campaign for laws that acknowledge their right to challenge her to a duel and shoot her brains off for posting these insults.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 08:32 AM
1

This is exactly what we need. Thank you, thank you, thank you!
/r/MensRights30/05/12 10:17 PM
4

Philip Zimbardo once set up a fake prison, got the police to "arrest" the volunteers at their homes (causing neighbours to think these people were really under arrest), brought them in, had other volunteers act like prison guards with no training and just let the guards loose on the prisoners. None of them were told, on joining, that they were free to leave any time they wanted. It is noted that as he watched the videos of prisoner-volunteers getting humiliated, he laughed copiously. Eventually,…
/r/MensRights24/05/12 11:13 AM
17

Very well-stated. The reality is that allowing women to indulge in their instincts (and paying them benefits for it) leads to tortured single men, neglected children and a poisoning of the gene pool with evil traits.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 10:33 PM
-10

Adultery should become a crime again. The threat of a prison sentence can help turn lawless scum into law-abiding scum.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 10:22 PM
1

If the moderators wish, we could create an MRFacebook or MRPastebin subreddit that contains all these instances. I am all for it.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 01:33 PM
1

Post this link: daughtersofnarcissisticmothers.com/ There are case stories there IIRC. The female supremacist might be surprised.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 08:56 AM
4

Also note that I would like to apply the exact same moral standards to women and men, but feel that it has to be pointed out, specifically, what these standards are.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 08:50 AM
7

The point is that it has nothing to do with the "privilege" of the general public and everything to do with the intent of the murderer along with the innocence and vulnerability of the victim. It makes little difference whether everyone else is "privileged".
/r/MensRights20/05/12 01:32 PM
1

I talk to people about it - unless I know they're feminists, in which case I don't bother. I am seriously thinking of forming a men's rights group in the UK. If anyone knows of an already existing group, please let me know about it.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 05:26 AM
-1

In all honesty, no-fault divorce would be fairly reasonable if the victim (i.e. the person being abandoned) was given the decision of whether to award anything to the perpetrator. A better solution to stopping abuse (and I have no idea if this is implemented anywhere) would be to actually make psychological abuse illegal and accept video evidence of it in court.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 05:21 AM
6

I saw a lecturer of Bioethics degenerate into a gibbering imbecile after I wrote a post mentioning male homelessness, workplace deaths, hypergamy etc. He simply contended to ignore most of the post, pick on only two points that were not quite as serious as the rest (but still perfectly valid) and throw vague ridicule around. I believe his response to my assertion that there are disadvantanges to being straight, such as having to wade through a culture of hypergamous women in order to find someon…
/r/MensRights19/05/12 05:26 PM
1

My ex-girlfriend, to whom I was deeply devoted, apologized for a lot of the horrible things she did... Then she decided to sleep at another man's house for a week before finally dumping me in front of all her friends, who explained to me that "if she dislikes me, she doesn't need a reason and I should just go". She called you a "pussy" for leaving the car. Unless she also apologized for that and gave a sound explanation for it, expect more abusive crap from her in the future (and hopefully video…
/r/MensRights17/05/12 09:16 PM
1

" I received account monetization again today! (: I just need to set up a new bank account! " May I suggest either not giving this person any views or pointing to videos that obviously contain hate speech so that we can get her banned?
/r/MensRights17/05/12 08:52 PM
1

It would be wonderful if everyone could test another person's psychological traits, particularly their sense of empathy. This would help remove the problem of psychopaths of both genders abusing their spouses and children.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 08:41 PM
-5

I agree that sending it as a chain letter would be rude, but there's nothing in it that's untrue (certainly in the case of the majority of women), whereas the original chain mail seems as far from reality as it could get.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 08:06 PM
0

This woman probably suffers from Narcissistic Personality Disorder. People with this disorder cannot care about other people (or other living / nonliving things), but do care a great deal about themselves and expect to be cared about by everyone. They feel entitled to whatever support they receive and find it a horrendous chore to reciprocate it, so they often find what most people would regard as happy and loving interactions to be "heart"-rendingly tedious.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 10:39 AM
24

Victim... Envy?! I got abused as a child. Anyone want to envy me? The real problem I have is that, unless serious reforms reach our society within two decades, none of these feminists will be going to jail for their evil actions.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 10:29 AM
5

This is true. I think the problem is that we're not holding women to any standards of accountability and not educating men to subject women to these standards. If you don't like a guy because he's "weak" or "soft", look in the mirror. If you don't like a guy because he's short or poor, again, look in the mirror. You're probably not that tough, tall or rich yourself. Don't expect better treatment than you are willing to give (and be aware that some people, myself included, will do their best to c…
/r/MensRights15/05/12 09:33 PM
4

Yeah, my mother did this. Among other things, she once read through my diary (along with my father), once stuck her head through the changing room curtains repeatedly (while the storekeepers watched with embarrassment) and asked me whether I was done changing, encouarged me to read pornographic magazines (as a 12-14-year-old), once called me "seductive"... It was hideous.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 11:52 AM
11

Did you write about your experiences on any website or blog (i.e. somewhere that won't sink to the bottom of a newsfeed)? I really wasn't aware of this, and it sounds like something people would want to campaign on.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 11:47 AM
1

I disagree, I think hitting is okay if it's part of fighting an evil person. What exactly is wrong with hitting people?
/r/MensRights15/05/12 09:30 AM
3

My mother was (is, though I am no longer living with my biological parents) an abuse enabler. She was always happy to ignore my suffering and throw me to the wolves if it meant that things would be safer and easier for her, while pressuring me to be the envy of everyone else. It never dawned on her that I was an actual person and more than a means of living out her own fantasies vicariously. Incidentally, one of the things I hate this feminized culture for is that everyone is against executing a…
/r/MensRights15/05/12 09:24 AM
2

Mmhmm... Why is the youtube video's author called 'beatingwomen'?
/r/MensRights14/05/12 10:40 PM
1

I would still pick an artificial womb over a real one, as it does not come with an entitlement princess attached, and you get to take care of wonderful babies that you know will never suffer the trauma of divorce.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 01:27 AM
1

I'm nothing like that, and I don't think I ever was. I find it really odd that men could do something so dishonourable as ~pay~ a woman for stripping in front of them, without her actually doing anything productive for the money. It's like paying for crack.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 01:12 AM
-1

I'm sure most of the people who were passing by her turned away in disgust, including people who consider themselves feminist. One or two might have hopefully asked the police to address her indecency.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 10:42 AM
2

Please give the name of his school so we can write complaint letters about it and hopefully get word about it in the media. Real children are suffering because of this piece of trash. On a related note, I wonder if any of the girls were saying anything against the favouritism.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 10:36 AM
1

I would happily stand in the street working next to you. It does help when we have a community.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 07:18 PM
2

Maybe a lot of people are moral creatures (to some degree) and care about spiritual as well as bodily harm...
/r/MensRights29/04/12 09:47 AM
0

I would very much like to see laws against adultery, but also believe in due process. A sticker is by no means evidence that the boyfriend did cheat.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 09:46 AM
5

There is a game in game theory (forgot its name) that uses three participants. The first has a sum of money and must split it between himself and a second person. The thrid person receives his own sum of money and can only spend that money to make the first person lose money. Occasionally, the first person decides to split the money 70:30 or 80:20 (etc.) in his favour rather than 50:50. It has been shown that in these cases, the third person usually decides to punish the first person, even if it…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 12:11 AM
7

I used to think that it really wasn't in a woman's nature to feel so egalitarian. Thank you for sharing this.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 11:52 PM
-1

"leaving men unable to make even one contribution to society, as men, which is distinctive, necessary and can therefore be publicly valued" Police / military work, firefighting, engineering, mathematics, moral philosophy...
/r/MensRights26/04/12 06:21 PM
1

I wasn't aware there was even an issue with men in Africa being stereotyped.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 11:49 PM
5

On a social level, the problem is that these women end up having children with a small group of evil men, thereby perpetuating a mix of their own scummy genotypes and the scummy genotypes of their partners, leaving genuine qualities to slowly disappear from humanity.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 11:16 PM
2

So you think true love 'sucks'...
/r/MensRights25/04/12 03:31 PM
0

"The fawning devotion, cloying sensitivity, prissy euphemizing about sex (“making love”) — Charles is the perfect guy. As neuters go." I particularly take issue with the male love-shaming. If a woman were to call me a 'neuter' for being caring and loving, I would go right up to her and punch her in the face, and damn the prison sentence. If people look down on you for being caring and loving, you know our society has real problems, and it wasn't "patriarchy" or even "culture" that created them, …
/r/MensRights25/04/12 02:12 PM
3

"“I felt like I was cruelly duped by much of the television I saw,” Miss Dunham told the New York Times last month." That's why television is no substitute for a conscience. Live by the sword, die by the sword.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 02:00 PM
3

Maybe I have really thick skin. If she has an earnest belief that 'men are stupid', i.e. impulsive, she need only remember the workers of male authors and thinkers who aren't stupid at all, such as Einstein and Socrates. Heck, the latter DIED because his principles forbade him from fleeing before his execution.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 02:00 PM
3

How about, instead of "don't marry", we adopt the stance of "campaign against the broken marriage laws"?
/r/MensRights23/04/12 09:12 PM
1

It's a really well-designed film as far as I can tell, though I don't particularly like the black propaganda element. I upvoted but wished that it would address the taboo against punching women (which I am thoroughly against when it comes to evil women) in a more serious manner.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 09:35 AM
-1

This sort of thing is called "black propaganda" and is indeed something worth taking action against.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 07:01 PM
-2

I'm definitely using the phrase "the Important Sex" from now on. Also, we should probably express our solidarity with him on a more public forum, perhaps contacting him directly or setting up a facebook page. If a woman dumps someone "just because" (not saying this was the case here), the victim has a right to retaliate, albeit effective legal means should be set up to ensure this.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 01:50 PM
1

I wholeheartedly encourage you to strive to cultivate new abilities, devise worthy goals and pursue them relentlessly. I hope your mother's feminist attitudes haven't marred your perspectives.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 01:25 PM
-9

Wait, dad-positive? The girl hates him for, of all things, BEING BORN DEAF-MUTE. What if he had hated her for being born less physically fit, courageous and determined than a typical man? And he wants to give up his house and blood for that ungrateful brat? We need to explain to people in less-than-friendly language that this does not apply.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 09:41 AM
0

I upvoted some of the comments, but I'm convinced she's a troll. If not, thanks to her posting the details on Reddit, there is now a chance the victim can use them as evidence.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 09:12 AM
0

Read from page 6 onward to get an understanding of why women have the audacity to dislike those men who care about them and commit to them. I feel really angry about it, and look forward to more people understanding the situation so that we can eventually take collective action regarding the issue.
/r/MensRights21/04/12 09:38 PM
1

I agree. My father is an evil man and it would have been a lot better if my mother ever decided to leave him (or, better yet, get him in prison). Divorce can happen for a lot of reasons, and some of them are very respectable.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 04:36 PM
2

All I'm doing right now is posting things on Facebook and talking to people I know - which can be depressing, particularly when running into trolls. I also recently wrote a complaint letter. Raising awareness is important. It would be great to help make a documentary on family courts, highlighting their corruption, or if one already exists, organize a film showing at local community centers. Some of us might get that sort of thing turned down (I know my student's union is atrociously feminist an…
/r/MensRights11/04/12 11:09 PM
0

Film her having sex with the colleague, find out who the husband is, then discreetly send him the film. Unfortunately, one of the worst atrocities that liberalism brought about was the decriminalization of adultery. A long-term solution to this particular problem would involve campaigning to make adultery a crime if the victim wishes to press charges.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 03:48 AM
2

"The lesson -- don't sign a prenup ... unless you're loaded." Or unless you have dignity and feel the need to be cautious.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 11:56 PM
3

Also, by all means, critique the article in your comments here. I feel it comes across as too abstract (there is no comparison with female genital mutilation or mention of the men's rights movement) and not angry enough.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 11:52 PM
20

Another subreddit post has been made regarding the same link. I have to ask: where do we send our complaint letters? I cannot find any buttons on the yahoo news page. I will look more thoroughly if no one replies within an hour.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 07:11 PM
3

Thank you very much for doing this. I wish I had a significant story to tell, but the only completely passive woman I ever dealt with closely was my mother. I suspect you only want to address romantic relationships.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 11:46 PM
-19

the webcomic is in such poor taste that I cannot find any reason to support it, however illegitimate the complaint against it was. To quote: "You're marked, bitch. When you eventually die, some of my friends are gonna dog pile your soul. Hahahahahaha!" ahem
/r/MensRights07/04/12 11:34 PM
1

"For instance, if a man at the next table refuses to keep his voice down or doesn't stop smoking even though it's a smoke-free restaurant, you should get the green light to stand up for your woman's right to enjoy the night and say something. Resolving this conflict and others that affect her time with you will net you big points." I was already concerned about the article when it hinted that, in the author's wrong opinion, cheating is somehow okay. The above quote made me realize he was address…
/r/MensRights07/04/12 12:27 PM
0

I remember an incident when I overheard a young woman in my zen meditation group (which I left soon after) commenting on how she once joked to her boyfriend about leaving him, and how he broke down and begged her not to. She apparently found the whole thing funny and mentioned that whiny men annoyed her. The (female) practicioner who led the zendo agreed with her. I wish I had attacked her while I still had no legal liability. Now I would just come up to her and yell "shut the fuck up, you worth…
/r/MensRights06/04/12 02:57 PM
3

Gender was arguably the pretext. Malice was the reason.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 02:54 PM
3

I agree that, if you're doing an essay on the book, you need to strictly address the book itself, as well as its context at the time it was published. Anything else should be relegated to no more than a sentence.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 02:58 PM
10

It's antifeminist because these evil women are praised by a major media outlet, arguably as part of feminist culture in general. It's about men's rights because the existence of these women puts our rights in jeopardy.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 02:29 PM
4

I respect your statements. I also don't believe you would ever deserve a prison sentence for it, especially as it would arguably be in self-defence.
/r/MensRights31/03/12 09:06 AM
2

The correct emotion to feel against someone committing acts of evil is anger, not disgust. Disgust merely leads you away from the problem, whereas anger leads you towards a solution.
/r/MensRights31/03/12 08:59 AM
1

Why the downvotes? There was an article posted on AVFM more than a month ago with the same statements. If that wasn't genuine news, can someone please link to evidence?
/r/MensRights28/03/12 07:05 PM
6

I disagree. It's much more easy for one's hypocrisy to be exposed when one calls herself an equalitarian than when one calls herself a feminist. After all, she's a feminist - of course she's going to put women's privileges on top of the agenda!
/r/MensRights24/03/12 06:47 PM
6

I have been trolled by feminists in my local university. The feminists in another university tried to get a men's group banned on campus, in spite of the group's statement that it would support and seek counseil from the feminists (which I saw as a giant mangina cop-out). Feminists posted nasty comments on a Buddhist forum when I talked about how hypergamy causes suffering. Feminism attracts this kind of people. They swarm to it. And when you cave in to them, they revel in it, because that's the…
/r/MensRights23/03/12 08:30 PM
3

Thank you for sharing this. This really needs more upvotes.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 11:48 PM
4

Very true. I suspect this is the general attitude of people who adopt a passive stance in life, wanting to receive experiences rather than wanting to perform actions.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 10:26 PM
2

"But in a stinging judgment yesterday, Federal Court judge John Buchanan found Ms Dye’s allegations against the bankers were false and ordered her to pay costs…" Would this mean that the employer's legal costs have been paid by the accuser?
/r/MensRights17/03/12 10:18 PM
1

I wouldn't say that "we hate each other" so much as "psychopaths try to abuse everyone if they can get away with it". People do discuss rape by male perpetrators in this subreddit, though I agree that the main focus is antifeminism.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 09:14 PM
4

I'm assuming this is the person who said "Men are babies and women are far stronger creatures, in my opinion." while grinning with delight.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 03:59 PM
5

I think this was a way of saying that her original post was referring to sexism. She pretended to misinterpret your post. I did that once when I commented about finally having evidence that good women exist after seeing girlwriteswhat's first few videos. Someone predictably replied saying that he "found that offensive". I replied by agreeing - essentially saying that I found women's attitudes offensive as well. I don't see any need for a witty reply to her post. You made your point rather clearl…
/r/MensRights12/03/12 11:51 PM
1

It's worth bearing in mind that complaints that go through 'internal procedures' usually result in a whitewash. I don't see any place in the article clearly stating that the 'unfounded' accusations had been addressed by external investigators, although the article seems to imply it.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 04:28 PM
2

Link to the original article: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/monique-honaman/i-just-wish-he-would-have_b_1297919.html If you have the misfortune of marrying such a piece of filth, the state should at least have the courtesy to give you everything you wanted when she filed for the no-fault divorce. "No-fault" simply means it wasn't the victim's fault that they were betrayed, and they should receive adequate compensation from the perpetrator for the suffering induced instead of having to give up ha…
/r/MensRights12/03/12 01:52 PM
6

Celebrity? He's the scum of the Earth. He ran the Stanford Prison Experiment, which amounted to torture, and enjoyed making fun of the victims with his chums. The graduate student he was sleeping with was alarmed by this and pulled the plug on the experiment.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 11:29 AM
9

And people downvoted my posts on hypergamy...
/r/MensRights11/03/12 10:17 PM
14

This is typical of academic corruption. In my Russel Group university in the UK, my department requires all PhD students to perform "mandatory outreach work" (i.e. free advertising meant to draw in impressionable youths). If you have any sense of morals, get out of academia after you do your degree, and never start a PhD, unless you're absolutely, absolutely sure the department and university you're in are ethical institutions (they usually aren't).
/r/MensRights11/03/12 09:58 AM
1

Indeed. His lack of eloquence made him appear slightly like the people in some of those commercials - not saying that he was unintelligent, but his answers certainly made him out to be this way.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 09:56 AM
2

I disagree here. I do want children, even as a single parent, and would be reluctant to have one with a woman given the current laws.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 09:49 AM
0

Is this being downvoted because the opinion of a single woman is irrelevant and NAWALT, or is anyone feeling 'offended' by the idea that the woman in question could actually be disreputable?
/r/MensRights02/03/12 07:47 PM
1

Another issue (one that I think contributes to the downvotes here) is that good people tend to be disliked by the drones, i.e. the common, cowardly people who don't have the innate ability to cultivate virtues and generally do what the crowd does, reviling people who go above the norm. This is why it's generally advisable for good people to only support other good people, and be willing to put down the rest. You might want to read up on a recent scientific article, "the desire to expel unselfish…
/r/MensRights02/03/12 09:47 AM
4

The biggest concern I have is that MGTOW is not the actual solution when you want to fix things in the long term. To do that, children need to be born, and the women you wander away from will build such children on their own despicable template, while you probably won't counterbalance that with your own good children. To ensure that lasting good can be carried out in the world beyond one's own generation, one needs either access to artificial wombs (for which the research is not yet available) o…
/r/MensRights02/03/12 09:33 AM
-2

Morality is not something most women are capable of. A moral individual believes in reciprocation - that if one looks to be provided with the best treatment, at all times, one must be willing to provide the best treatment, at all times. Betraying and abandoning someone does not constitute good treatment (indeed, it is very bad treatment that should only be reserved for evil individuals), so it follows that every woman who thinks this way is immoral.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 02:43 PM
1

I don't like some of the article's insinuations. Responsibility is a box to the same extent that to define words is to constrain language...
/r/MensRights29/02/12 07:43 PM
-4

I recently learned that a woman I was privately debating with about injustice in dating (and, yes, injustice in dating is a genuine problem) held the belief that it was okay to dump her partner if she felt unhappy with him or found someone she would be happier with. She even argued that this would be better for him, because he wouldn't have to stay in a "relationship" in which the other person was unhappy. It dawned on me that this was the attitude, privately or publicly expressed, of nearly all…
/r/MensRights29/02/12 10:27 AM
2

Be bold. Add any topic that you believe to be relevant to the article.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 10:54 PM
3

It's just one deeply flawed opinion expressed by an anonymous person, though.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 08:40 PM
0

Jazzeki, people do decide who they love and who they don't. I can easily give my arguments to a woman as to why I am or am not attracted to her and let her decide on whether she wants to work on these things to be with me or find someone with different standards. This is simply the right thing to do. It's also something I have never seen a woman do. "I'm simply not attracted to you" is just one variant of "there's no reason for me to care about your feelings and intentions". My apologies, but th…
/r/MensRights20/02/12 01:56 AM
0

Thank you for explaining this for me. Yes, I can "game" and get into bed with unethical women (I did this once just to see if it was true that a woman would fall for it, and I hated the experience). I could, in principle, manipulate unethical women into staying with me enough to procreate. The experience would be hell on earth - I would have to break every ethic there is in the world. I think I'll just write an article on my experiences in A Voice for Men.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 11:42 PM
-6

Of course not. If he were my friend, he would not want to see to it that people like me went extinct, and would be a little worried about that prospect. If he could loan me money to pay for raising a baby in an artificial womb (assuming the technology were available), he would do it. That's not the issue, though. The idea is that the typical woman's position, that romance is a way for her to sort through the "detritus" of ordinary men in pursuit of the one who will be just perfect for all her wh…
/r/MensRights19/02/12 10:38 PM
15

If a woman doesn't love me, prefers to stay single over being with me and makes tons of excuses for it without pointing to a single defect I have that would make bonding with me an unpleasant experience, I am forced to concede that the woman doesn't care about what I want to build with her, that she keeps me at arm's length for the benefits she receives from our "friendship", that she would "reciprocate" my love only if it came with benefits to her self-interest and that, owing to her dishonesty…
/r/MensRights19/02/12 09:42 PM
0

I also need to ask: how did you reply to her? Whenever I see a slut post like this, I post a comment on her immorality in order to build solidarity with whatever virtuous men might be reading it. I think we need to impose our moral standpoints on dating and romance, because the feminists certainly seem to be bringing out the worst of outcomes.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 08:55 PM
-11

This is why a moral society cannot be run by women. They would drive all good people to extinction simply through sexual selection.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 08:45 PM
5

So this is what psychopaths write about.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 11:42 AM
-3

" First we must acknowledge that misandry is partly reality-based to the degree that it is in part a reaction to misogyny, and to the real or perceived oppression of women by men." Funny, I always thought misandry was caused by gratuitously evil women taking advantage of men's inborn collective goodwill towards them...
/r/MensRights17/02/12 04:15 PM
0

I hear they stone these women in more civilized parts of the world, probably as much for the sake of justice as to strengthen the gene pool. Also, whose money is he really spending on her? How did he manage to get it, and from whose labour? Did he exploit anyone or engage in ruthless political backstabbing in the process?
/r/MensRights17/02/12 12:15 AM
11

I'm fairly sure this video has already been posted on reddit, but thanks for that. It's really good to be reminded that there are decent women out there, women who respect the rights of men and willingly refuse the privileges they could easily possess.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 11:44 PM
2

That last photo makes me think you're trolling. I talk to people I know about the issues whenever an opportunity presents itself.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 10:26 AM
7

Not if it's a spy camera. There are such things as pen cameras, wrist-watch cameras etc. Spy cameras are excellent for (f.ex.) intervening in a crime without fear that you'll be branded as the aggressor.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 03:27 AM
4

The author is not in favour of Theo Paphitis' views at all. For instance: "And, sadly, Paphitis isn't alone in his unreconstructed views." I would encourage you to re-read the whole article. Also, it really seems as though you're trolling.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 01:24 PM
2

I think it would be really helpful for a lot of people if you reposted this on a website like AVFM. It would be a shame for it to be lost in the depths of a subreddit.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 01:19 PM
1

I'm not that pessimistic about the current generation, and I would argue that artificial wombs, when they come around, will solve the problem of feminism entirely. If men can produce their own lineage without relying on women, there will be no arguments left on anyone's side for supporting feminine self-indulgence.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 01:13 PM
3

Love is a virtue - one that is well beyond the capabilities of many women. The fact that they attempt to sling mud at it with comments such as "Nice guys…are like sluts. Emotional sluts." makes me hope they will never have children.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 01:05 AM
1

I wouldn't call a woman with that mentality 'fantastic'...
/r/MensRights12/02/12 10:54 PM
1

I dislike the article for statements like this: "The internet is bristling with men writing about what they regard as women's sexual arrogance." 'what they regard as'? Sure, historians might write about 'what they regard as' Stalin's mass murders. The author is a bit reluctant to admit that those women are evil.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 10:36 PM
-1

People who don't believe him/her, evidently. I neither downvoted nor upvoted the comment, as I have no evidence to suggest this person either lied or told the truth. I do argue that, when it comes to dating, believing anything a woman says is inevitably the wrong choice.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 09:43 PM
2

I would guess it means "recession that largely affects men", i.e. the assertion that there has been a much higher rate of male compared to female unemployment during this recession.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 01:19 AM
0

"The flip-side of this was a craving for nurturing and positive affirmation." I fail to see how this was a flip-side. "Subramaniam's mental state left her vulnerable to the advances of other men, and some time after she began working at ING she began what became a long-term sexual relationship with a supervisor." Now, this motivates me to write a letter to SMH, one that, though hopefully eloquent and well-substantiated, will at its heart strive to express a variety of three-letter acronyms...
/r/MensRights11/02/12 11:41 AM
3

It would help to build a website that documented these problems - a sort of register-her for corporations. What does everyone else think?
/r/MensRights11/02/12 11:19 AM
1

This never happens to me, though I have seen my share of white knights.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 10:05 PM
1

My heart was pounding and my hands trembling from the adrenalin after I saw this. If this sort of thing happened right in front of me, I would totally jump in to beat the snot out of the woman and any white knights who decided to collude with her (or, admittedly, getting beaten up by the horde of those people, but still doing my best to fight them off). I sincerely hope everyone here feels the same.
/r/MensRights30/01/12 01:58 AM
1

I strongly sympathize with the antifeministatheist article. Thanks for linking to this blog.
/r/MensRights30/01/12 01:53 AM
7

Alphas? Betas? The point of the MRM is solidarity, not intimidating each other or drumming on our chests...
/r/MensRights17/01/12 01:16 PM
1

As a former abuse victim, I would argue that the abusers who still exist right now, male or female, can't stop themselves. They don't hold themselves accountable for their own actions. Read up on narcissism or psychoathy and you will easily see why. I especially like Kathleen Krajco's ebook - it's free and she passed away a few years ago, so I don't feel I'm advertising by saying this. I think it's important to emphasize that there are evil women out there who abuse their children (or those of o…
/r/MensRights14/01/12 07:30 PM
2

It sounds as though artificial wombs would be beneficial to society, since that would relieve a lot of the artificial scarcity of women, and thus consumer debt etc. All this also explains why past cultures reined in women's sexuality; they did so partly becuse, to quote from the article, “[women feel that] when there’s a scarcity of women, women felt men should go out of their way to court them”. This speaks so much of shameless, inherent immorality that I cannot understand how people don't cond…
/r/MensRights14/01/12 04:56 PM
2

Female apologists may have negged your post, but I really love this show. Finally, someone is telling the truth and being met with cheers for it!
/r/MensRights09/01/12 08:33 PM
1

It's worth noting that the ratio of children abused by male single parents to that of children abused by single parents of any gender: 12.8%. Now what I would like to see is if the ratio of single fathers to single parents of any gender.
/r/MensRights09/01/12 01:50 PM
-13

According to wikipedia, asssault is a crime that involves making the victim fear violence. I'm not sure if the victim was actually afraid of further violence so much as disturbed by the acting out. The fact that she got arrested is presumably a good thing, in any case, though the article is very scant on the details of the conflict.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 07:20 PM
1

Workplace mobbing is a common occurrence in academic settings. I don't see this so much as an MRA issue as a more general issue of envious colleagues removing an excellent teacher.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 09:55 PM
7

It's worth remembering that the female owner of lovefraud.com had the same general experience. She was apparently trying to warn people about a psychopathic ex-partner.
/r/MensRights14/12/11 11:11 PM
4

Men are far more often diagnosed with ASPD and NPD than women, while the reverse is true for HPD and BPD; the more pertinent question should be whether significantly more women than men are diagnosed yearly with the cluster B disorders. BTW, I don't see anything wrong with diagnosing people you have known well for several years with a personality disorder when you're not a "qualified psychiatrist". The DSM only contains checklists that just about anyone is intelligent enough to understand, and q…
/r/MensRights28/11/11 12:27 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter