TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

princessxmombi Archive

View 0 posts and 276 comments by princessxmombi on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Not that hard to understand: Are people more conservative and judgmental about casual sex in the area? Is it an area that has more women than men? etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/23 07:39 PM
1

This is definitely not true in many places, but I could see it being the case in smaller towns/cities. I’ve gone home with dudes the first night a few times and I’m someone who prefers long term, monogamous relationships. A lot of women like me have brief periods where they are very open to casual sex, and it’s usually after getting out of a long term relationship or being in an on and off one. Even during those periods, it definitely has to do with the type of guy someone is. They don’t have to…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/23 07:37 PM
2

I’m a woman and during periods I’ve been single, I’ve gone home with guys I met out at bars/clubs. They were all nice looking but I wouldn’t say Henry Cavill-good looks. Confidence and a pleasant (positive) and non-pushy attitude go a long way.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/23 07:21 PM
3

I disagree with this. Many women don’t trust men who come on too romantically right away. Love bombing is real and if you’ve experienced it (and the aftermath) this kind of thing can not only sets off alarm bells, but cause actual repulsion. Also, many women feel that if a man is too interested right away, he’s just looking to get into a relationship with / fuck anyone and it’s not about actually wanting her. Any sign of desperation, even if it’s a small hint, is unattractive to both sexes. The …
/r/seduction13/09/22 08:18 PM
2

So these women obviously aren’t special to you in any way, but you look down on them because you think they don’t view you as some one of a kind catch either? Just like men, women like sex. Sometimes that’s with someone you’re deeply in love with (if you’re lucky) other times it’s with a person you just find attractive. That in no way makes someone unworthy or ineligible for a meaningful relationship down the road. I’d seriously reflect on why your mind is going somewhere so hypocritical.
/r/seduction30/07/22 07:03 PM
0

Whether or not it’s a “normal” job, doesn’t decide whether it’s “work.” I’m a professional with a masters degree and have never signed a contract for any of the jobs I’ve worked. Do landscapers, retail employees, restaurant workers who don’t get health insurance not “work?” Freelance workers who don’t get health insurance don’t “work?” People working under the table, busting their asses in restaurant kitchens “don’t have a job?” Do you even know what entitled means? Please explain to me how enti…
/r/seduction26/07/22 10:34 PM
0

Where does his explanation imply it isn’t work? Are ways of making money only “work” if they adhere to your personal morals? You sound like a dumb teenager who doesn’t know much about the world. I personally wouldn’t have sex for money for many reasons, but that doesn’t mean it isn’t “work.”
/r/seduction26/07/22 06:38 PM
1

Now that I’ve said my piece (which I 100% stand by), I want to address what I am guessing is the cause of your sensitivity toward this issue. I did take a look at your posts and see you’re only 21 and have some insecurities regarding women and relationships. I may be making assumptions in the rest of this comment, so take it how you will. I do want to note that 21 is still very young in my eyes, and while it’s legally an adult I don’t consider 21 year olds to be full adults yet. SO, don’t take e…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 03:36 AM
1

First of all, calm your ass down. I said having an attitude that you need to “teach” your partner is creepy. Not that sex with virgins is automatically creepy. Learn how to read. Your example is of a girl in high school. In high school sex with virgins is normal because there’s still a large percentage of virgins in your peer group. You may be a child still, but I’m grown and therefor talking about adults. I AM a woman. Most of my friends and family are women. I spend time in women’s spaces. I k…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 03:22 AM
1

Lolllll. No, sorry but that’s a very small minority of women. And I sure as hell have never met one of them. Women who aren’t virgins want men who aren’t virgins. It’s hard enough to get a sexually experienced guy to satisfy you in bed, very few women are interested in trying to teach someone who has zero experience. It’s why virgin males in this group are frequently told to get some experience with sex workers first.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/22 11:46 PM
34

There’s no dead bedrooms in ONS and FWB situations because their only point is for sex, and not for an extended period of time. Once the sex fizzles the connection is over, so the FWB scenario ends. ONS last one night, and the sex may or may not be good for either party depending on a number of factors.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/22 06:36 AM
2

I don’t know. I don’t call my exes. They still try to call and text me though (11 and 3 years later).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/22 01:43 AM
2

I mean, I wouldn’t want to have to teach a man how to have sex and never have, so I don’t really know about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 08:14 PM
1

No, you’re just fucked in the head if you think violence or murder is an appropriate reaction to this. ESPECIALLY toward those who are entirely innocent in the situation. Get professional help if you think it’s okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 06:47 PM
2

Okay, do you want a partner or a student then? You keep trying to make it less creepy but you’re not doing a very good job. Teachers have a certain level of power over their students, which is why it’s either illegal, against policy, or at the very least extremely frowned upon for teachers to date or sleep with their students. I’m just convinced you all have never been in actual relationships and just can’t fathom what the dynamic of a healthy one should be.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 06:45 PM
1

Hm. Now let’s compare that imbalance to the one that favors men, where their bodies are at no point bearing the brunt of pregnancy or labor (or even abortion if that is even an option for the woman anymore), and that they can walk away at any time during the pregnancy they helped to create. That happens much more often than men wrongly being identified as the bio father. What can we do to correct that imbalance? Child support doesn’t actually correct that imbalance and these women usually don’t …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 12:49 AM
1

Not gonna lie, I would be hurt and I’d want to talk about why that was a concern for him and see what was at the basis of the trust issue (it would be especially surprising because he’s not a jealous or suspicious person). But I wouldn’t fight it if he wanted one.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 12:29 AM
1

I’m not dictating when a man can ask for one. I just don’t think every man needs or even wants one, so forcing it as a standard is unnecessary. And while people who seem trustworthy can definitely let you down, I do think there are generally indicators there that people choose to ignore because they don’t really want the truth. If they do want the truth, they can request a DNA test.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/22 08:16 PM
1

I would feel awful and furious. But again, this isn’t the norm and nobody here is saying that men can’t ask for a DNA test on an individual basis. I just don’t think there is a need to make it standard, especially when the medical industry up-charges the shit out of everything and pregnancy is already so expensive. Shit, any suspicious man could just get an Ancestry or 23andMe DNA test if he needs confirmation without even having to get the mother’s permission. But I don’t think it should be for…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/22 08:05 PM
1

I’m not married but my boyfriend wouldn’t ask me that because he has no reason to think I would ever cheat and I have zero history of cheating in previous relationships. There’s mutual trust there. Now, if I was single and pregnant by a dude who didn’t know me well, or who I’d been sleeping with but not in a monogamous relationship, I’d understand why he’d want a test. And if I was in a relationship in which I cheated in the past (again, wouldn’t happen) and the guy needed confirmation it was hi…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/22 08:02 PM
1

I absolutely can sympathize. I guess I can’t empathize because I can’t get anyone pregnant as a woman. I think any woman who would do that to a man (or her child) is despicable and deserves condemnation. I can absolutely understand why it would be traumatic for the man and children. It’s a huge betrayal. If I were a man who this happened to I’m sure I would feel some hatred and extreme bitterness toward the woman. With all that said, none of that justifies murder of anyone and I’m tired of men t…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/22 07:02 PM
2

Absolutely agree about the sociopathy. And you’re most likely right that people defending killing the kids aren’t parents. I bet some of the men who think it’s justified to kill the mother are parents though.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 11:59 PM
-1

No, I wouldn’t. I trust my man not to cheat. If it got to the point where there was so little trust I felt the need to do that, I’d end the relationship. In some instances, it’s appropriate for a man to ask for a paternity test. But that’s a small minority of cases that doesn’t need to extend to all others.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 11:50 PM
-5

Please don’t pretend like the motivation for this has anything to do with the child’s health. You know that’s not why people are pushing for it. And it would be a huge waste of money to spend on the 98-99% of babies it would not apply to. If a woman gets pregnant by someone she’s not in a monogamous relationship with or a man has doubts due to the woman cheating in the past, then he can request one. The vast majority of people do not need or want this.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 11:47 PM
-4

Men suggesting this should be standard are paranoid weirdos. Nobody said there aren’t instances where it’s warranted. Generally, it’s not.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 11:42 PM
3

Ugh let’s hope. There are a lot of horrible parents out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 11:41 PM
1

Do you know what a strawman is? Cuz this ain’t it. The original commenter said “he killed them all” (wife and kids). Someone else says “I cannot blame him” and when someone else questioned that, you followed suit by also saying you “can’t blame him.” Thinking murder of anyone is okay in this scenario is insane on its own. Defending murder of innocent children takes it to next level psycho.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 11:39 PM
-11

Because not everyone is a paranoid weirdo and the % of pregnancies in which this happens is low. Men can request DNA testing on an individual basis if they think there was a likelihood of their partner cheating. You better have good reason to believe it is a likelihood before suggesting it to your pregnant partner though.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 09:50 PM
2

The kids are also surely blind sided and very upset about finding out the only father they’ve known isn’t their biological dad. I mean, any person who’d mislead someone into parenting a child that isn’t theirs (but thinks it is) is an awful person.. but red pillers are showing their sociopathy and total lack of emotional intelligence in this thread. Raising a kid from infancy and immediately losing all feeling for them because you find out they aren’t yours biologically shows a person is incapab…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 09:40 PM
2

Did the kids earn it too, psycho?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 09:32 PM
1

What is your definition of the female equivalent of a v taper? I don’t know any adult men who have that who aren’t total gym rats. Plenty of people (men and women) eat well, work out regularly, are slim, but not cut like that. I don’t look like a female body builder, but I’ve been told I have a great body since I was like 13 (which, ew). 5’5”, 120 lbs, big breasts, small waist, round hips and butt (hourglass figure). It’s mostly genetics and eating healthy (I don’t count calories), but I try to …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 02:50 PM
2

Yeah, um.. men wanting to “teach” or “turn” a woman is an even bigger yikes. Do you want a romantic partner or a child?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 04:19 PM
8

Someone not having previous relationship experience is a “yikes” for most adults.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 10:01 PM
3

Euphoria is pretty similar to my high school experience. Definitely dramatized and very Gen Z (I’m a millennial), but still very relatable regarding the characters and what they’d be up to.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 09:58 PM
1

Yeah, I can understand that. It seems more like a personal incompatibility though than that anxiety should be a red flag for most people.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 06:01 PM
1

Ex wife had BPD which is the worst. My ex also has BPD. Can confirm it’s the worst. Anxiety is a no for me. Interesting. I have pretty bad anxiety but no partner (or family or friends) has ever complained about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 06:45 AM
1

In terms of mental illness, do you mean the more debilitating ones (personality disorders, bipolar, schizophrenia, OCD, MDD) or any mental illness? Automatically ruling out anyone with anxiety or mild depression (assuming they’re otherwise functional) seems a tad extreme, especially since both are so common.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 05:27 AM
3

This is repulsive advice that I think most RPers and definitely all BPers would strongly advise against (perhaps for different reasons).
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 04:37 PM
6

What if the person’s parents divorced but both happily remarried? Additionally, what if the parents remained amicable during/after divorce? Curious if you or others would still view that as a red flag.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 04:29 PM
2

😍
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 07:52 PM
1

You’re assuming these are men who struggle with women. They aren’t. Not a single man I’m talking about is with a woman less attractive than they are (many of the women are more attractive). They also are equal or above in most other important aspects. If your kids are already almost grown, you’re in an older age group than me or most of the men and women I’m referring to.. so your feelings on the matter likely differ than a good portion of people who are younger. The only younger men who seem to…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 07:51 PM
7

I’m in a relationship with a mechanic (who had no trouble getting women before me) and I have to say that the working with his hands thing is pretty hot. But I also tend to like blue collar guys who read a lot and are cultured. It’s not super easy to find which makes it more attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 03:19 AM
1

OR, I know because I’ve witnessed them date and enter relationships with women who’ve slept around? But sure, you know my closest friends, family, and romantic partners better than I do! All men are exactly like you! /s
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 12:17 AM
3

This all may be true, but most women will find an otherwise reasonably attractive man attractive, defined abs or not. There’s a lot in between not having defined abs and being fat or even out of shape.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 11:47 PM
2

So my insults toward you are bad, but effectively calling me a liar is acceptable. K.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 05:57 PM
1

I don’t know a single man who cares, whether friend, family, or anyone I’ve engaged with romantically. The exception to this would be if the woman has a high n-count because she’d been a sex worker, in which case some still wouldn’t care. Of course many men do care, but I tend to surround myself with progressive, like-minded people so I don’t deal with them. I think it’s really sad you think that all women are the same, and all men are alike. I’d hate to live with that worldview.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 04:54 PM
1

So you’re implying that not only do I (and women in general) lie to potential partners about our #s, but that we’re so dead set on keeping up the facade that we’d also lie to some moron on the internet? No, you’re deluded. I’ve had sex with 10 people. That’s a low, average, or high number depending on the person you ask. I truly don’t give a shit what anyone thinks about it, and wouldn’t date a guy who was that judgmental, so I have zero reason to lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 04:47 PM
-3

Haven’t lied about my body count ever. I don’t have a single female friend who has felt the need to (women ranging from very low to what many men here would consider high). So stop sharing this bs. You have nothing to back it up. Some women lie about body count and so do some men, but that in no way means that’s the norm. I’m sick of hearing this. I’ve been hearing males tell me about my count since early high school, when I’d never had sex of any kind but was told I was lying. You don’t know wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 05:03 AM
-2

Yeah.. I’m not reading all that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 03:26 AM
0

Yes, I put myself at such risk “saving” him from some deeply insecure, red pill loser on Reddit. That you think you “cornered” him with your lame buzzword insults is both hilarious and tragically pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 10:07 PM
3

Lol. Your use of “soy boy” and “simp” show you have nothing of substance to counter their argument. Nobody who uses those terms is or should ever be taken seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 09:36 PM
1

“Name calling.” Lol. Why do you keep responding to say the exact same thing then?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 07:01 PM
9

How does that contradict what they said? He was negative towards women, especially black women. So obviously those are the voices you’ll hear talking the most about what a jerk he was. That doesn’t mean you have to be a woman to see he was an asshole. Any non-misogynistic men who knew of him think the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 03:38 AM
0

Okay, Ben Shapiro 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 03:29 AM
1

The legwork is not automatically on men. Both men and women feel the expectation to impress the other. If you think being a decent person so that you act in a way that puts women at ease is “legwork,” then you’re just too lazy to date and definitely too lazy for a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 03:49 AM
1

Yeah, but that wasn’t my point. I know women generally do better OLD. My point was that even WITH having the advantage of a lot of matches online, I still had to force myself as an introvert to get out there, be sociable, and present my best self, which felt especially daunting after not having dated for the 8 years I was in a prior relationship. It takes work and some men on here were complaining that if they have to work for it then they’re just not interested. That’s fine, but then they shoul…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 01:53 AM
1

60% of 20-24 year old males are not fat. Those states are for a much wider age range. Yeah we have an obesity problem in this country, but men tend to have higher metabolisms in their teens and throughout their 20s and don’t pack on weight until later. Prove the 30%. One study is not enough to make that a general statement. Also, a lot of people are still reeling from the pandemic and not meeting new people the way they previously would have, so I wouldn’t be surprised if more single men AND wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 01:47 AM
1

The average studio/1 br flat rental in London is £1,250. Food and entertainment is also very expensive in London. Not needing a car or paying crazy money for medical bills and student loans of course works in your favor, but you may also just be especially frugal and have found rare rental deals while living there. In general, men probably also feel safer living alone in cheaper, but sketchier areas that women wouldn’t. Very young men can also get away with living pretty bare bones, but that bec…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 07:51 PM
1

I’m not an exception to the rule. This isn’t even about me. It’s about men in the dating pool. As I’ve mentioned elsewhere, these averages are skewed by people living in areas of the country where dating is basically meet in high school > get married to the first person you dated > have multiple kids by early 20s. In these areas people make less (cost of living is less and fewer people go to college) and tend to be fatter. They also tend to have fewer sexual partners because there are fewer peop…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 05:47 PM
1

Yeah, seriously. I’m an introvert who loves spending most of my time home and am a woman who did very well on dating apps when single. I STILL had to really put myself out there socially to result in anything enjoyable. Sure, as a woman I could have picked dudes on OLD, said nothing but “come over and fuck me,” had sex and been done with it. But that’s not and never was even remotely appealing to me (or most women). I’m sure that is to many men, but that’s not my/women’s problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 05:15 PM
2

The average man in the UK doesn’t make $34,000 a year. Did you mean £34,000? My entire paternal side of the family lives in England and while I’d say the overall quality of life is better (universal healthcare, more affordable education), living at $34,000/yr would be very difficult in most parts of the country. Average full-time salary in the UK, as of 2020, was £38,600. That’s the equivalent of $46,536. $34,000 is equivalent to £28,201. Living on £38,600 is probably difficult in most large cit…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 05:04 PM
2

You are leaving out a lot of common expenses. Medical copays/bills, student loan payments, car, gas, and insurance, (or at the very least $100/month for a train/bus pass), clothing/shoes, toiletries etc. Once you factor in typical expenses, leave room for entertainment/spending money for hobbies, you’re either in the red or at the very least unable to save at all. But sure, if you share a poorly furnished studio apartment in a not nice area (maybe even with a roommate), don’t have health insuran…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 04:04 PM
1

“Average” here was used for men in general, so across America (or I guess anywhere “$” is used). Again, most people trying to actively date, especially using dating apps or approaching strangers, are living in these areas with much higher costs of living. People working full time in food trucks make more than $34k a year where I live, and the salaries/wages here are nowhere near as high as they are in at least 10 of the cities I named in my previous comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 03:35 PM
2

Also, that “take home” isn’t considering $ toward health insurance, dental, retirement, etc. It would be considerably less factoring in those.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 03:18 PM
2

That average is taking into account the salaries in much lower cost of living rural areas. But most people actively dating live in urban and suburban areas, as people in rural areas tend to settle down earlier with people they met and know IRL (through school, church, family friends, etc.). Living in NYC, LA, Chicago, San Fran, Boston, Austin, Seattle, Dallas, Portland, San Diego, New Orleans, Minneapolis, Nashville, Atlanta (I could go on forever) or the suburbs surrounding on $34k is practical…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 03:15 PM
1

That describes almost zero men I knew at 20-24. That’s definitely not the average in metropolitan areas of the US (maybe height, but not the rest).
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 02:48 PM
3

In reality, I think most men making $34k a year in an urban area in the US will struggle because that’s an unlivable wage in most places.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 02:37 PM
4

Nothing. I’m a proud introvert. But when it’s coupled with zero social skills it makes sense why those men aren’t having luck with women, even if their looks are average. Average looking men who have social skills don’t have trouble finding women to date or have relationships with, especially if they’re extroverted.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 02:31 PM
6

No. If I want to date/sleep around, I’ll be single and emotionally unattached. During the fairly brief periods I’ve been single as an adult, I had fun casually dating but it gets old after a few months and I quickly found talking to multiple men exhausting, even when there is no commitment/expectation. I can’t imagine all the mental energy it would take to have committed relationships with multiple men. Plus, I’m not wired to be in love with more than one person at a time and would not be happy …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/22 12:32 AM
6

I wouldn’t let a Brad Pitt lookalike in a MAGA hat go down on me, let alone entertain the idea of a relationship with him. There are right wing women who would, of course. But most adult women actually care about sharing values with the people they enter into relationships with. Edit: downvoted for stating my personal preference. Typical for this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/22 12:06 AM
8

I’m almost certain at this point that OP is trolling.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 09:47 PM
2

It is also the job of the man who impregnated said woman to take care of his responsibility OR make sure he’s only sleeping with women who would certainly abort if an unplanned pregnancy were to occur. I do agree that it is absolutely not the job of any man or woman to raise the child born from their partner’s infidelity.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 09:45 PM
5

But if a man cheats and gets another woman pregnant, he also runs the risk of being abandoned by the person he cheated on (and while it’s much less likely than the reverse, it is possible that the woman he impregnates decides to absolve herself of parental responsibility resulting in the man becoming a single dad). Regardless, choices have consequences. If you choose to cheat and your partner finds out, they have every justification to leave you. If you get pregnant or impregnate someone else wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 09:39 PM
1

It’s a relationship whether or not the couple are married. Marriage is just a legal and/or religiously symbolic add on to an existing relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 09:06 PM
2

I think there’s a distinction between red flags and basic incompatibilities. Red flags tend to be characteristics that would be problematic for almost any relationship. I do agree that someone who has their heart set on marriage shouldn’t pursue a relationship with someone who is anti-marriage, and vice versa.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 09:04 PM
2

I know a few couples whose tax burden went up when they married. The “tax benefits” claim is a common pro-marriage argument that really varies depending on where you live, what your income is, and a number of other factors.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 09:00 PM
2

I don’t think it’s a red flag on its own. Plenty of people who aren’t interested in getting married still want to have a life-long partner. There are many reasons people may want to avoid marriage: they may not see a reason to involve the government in their relationship. They may not be super traditional and feel a piece of paper doesn’t actually equate to a more committed union (look how common divorce is). They may have witnessed traumatic divorce(s) in their own family and not want to risk g…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 08:57 PM
2

Okay, you still haven’t clarified what you meant by “low value male” though. I’ve already said I don’t describe men that way (even those I find repugnant). I have found men above and well below 6 feet incredibly attractive. I haven’t had a single type as an adult, but I’m generally not into a typical male model look, though I can appreciate the beauty of those types of men. Not paying for anything is being a deadbeat. If you live together you should pay your half unless both people have agreed t…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 05:15 AM
2

Before I can accurately respond to this, I need to know what OP means by “low value man” in #4. It’s not a term I use or like, and I’ve seen it used here to describe a wide variety of men. If OP is using it the way FDS followers and RPers do, and just means the guy isn’t rich/paying for everything, isn’t 6 feet +, and doesn’t look like a male model, then that option would be my first choice (assuming we got along, love each other, and there is attraction and chemistry). If it means he’s sexist, …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 02:07 AM
1

..It has to do with it because I said it’s possible for a woman who stops giving enthusiastic blowjobs to not have stopped loving their partner. You argued I was wrong. I then gave myself as an example for why I know it’s possible. I know many other women who’ve had similar experiences. I know this is a debate sub. Your argument was incorrect and I explained why.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/22 02:12 AM
1

Oh I guess my own experience as a woman who previously lived this scenario doesn’t count then. Men always have a better understanding of how women think and feel than we do! /s You clearly understand very little about women and relationships. Nobody is promoting using sex as a weapon. In my case I was very clear about how unhappy I was and why. I was still in love at the time but wasn’t going to engage in sexual acts that made me feel further degraded by that person and there were various factor…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/22 11:29 PM
2

They’re really not though? I haven’t met a male who doesn’t happily give oral since high school.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/22 10:23 PM
1

It’s not necessarily a sign that a woman doesn’t love you anymore but it is indicative of her being unhappy with the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/22 10:13 PM
3

Spousal support or child support? Did your ex-wife not work? I’ve never met anyone under the age of 50 who pays or gets any spousal support, but all the women I know have their own careers.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/22 03:25 PM
1

Lol. I already stated it’s low. I don’t need to provide additional info to convince some PPD rando of that fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 03:32 PM
1

Another two years. And I don’t have a high n count even now with many tattoos. I’m much more a relationship person.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 02:55 PM
2

Millennial here. I got my first tattoo when I was still a virgin.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 01:35 PM
2

I think you’re a troll because it’s absolutely insane to accuse people of being shallow for not wanting to stay with a partner who makes them wait a year for sex, but not think it’s worse to lie to and betray that partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 03:18 PM
3

I’m pretty sure you’re trolling. Sex is an important part of a relationship for most people. It’s not unreasonable to say you’re not willing to wait an extreme amount of time. Personally, I think telling your boyfriend/girlfriend they have to wait a year is ridiculous (unless we’re talking teenagers dating). But no relationship is going to fully withstand a betrayal like cheating. It’s cruel, dishonest, and it would take forever to gain her trust back.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 04:15 AM
1

He has every right not to deal with waiting a year. I sure as hell wouldn’t. Cheating isn’t okay though. It’s lying and hurtful if he’s promised her monogamy until then. He should just break up with her, then find someone else more sexually compatible.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 04:09 AM
-1

The “don’t put all your eggs in one basket” is pretty much common sense early on. One date is not enough to know the other person or if you’re compatible enough to have a long-term relationship. Why would a woman stop dating others immediately after one date when she has no way of knowing if the guy wants a relationship with her? And if they do immediately want a relationship, that’s a red flag. Any woman or man that is ready to jump into a relationship with someone they just met has issues and …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 08:31 PM
1

Hell yeah I would. The older I get the more confidently I can say this. I am educated and own my home in a highly sought after area (crazy housing market), and am pretty good/careful with finances. I’m attractive / have a nice figure, and am pretty sexually adventurous. I live an overall healthy lifestyle (healthy diet and try to be reasonably active). I am very loyal, affectionate, and make an effort to be as ethical a person as possible. I have flaws like anyone else, but I wouldn’t mind simil…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 05:08 PM
2

If I threw myself at him? Maybe. He sleeps with a lot of women and has had casual sex with some of his friends without it turning into anything. But he knows there is zero chance of that happening with me and is definitely not pining. If I would never sleep with him and he knows that, would never make a move on me, and isn’t harboring unrequited love, why does it matter if he would? What about straight women with lesbian friends? Is that also not allowed, because the lesbian could possibly want …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 03:16 PM
1

Where exactly did I shame you? I’m not suggesting you care what I want. I’m arguing against what you and others in this thread clearly believe- which is that if women have male friends they’re bound to cheat on their partners with them. Just because you hung out with women who were willing to cheat with a “friend” doesn’t mean that’s common or normal for women to do. If you actually trusted your girlfriend, you wouldn’t worry about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 04:20 AM
1

I don’t want to fuck my male best friend (of 14 years) anymore than I want to fuck my female best friends (which isn’t at all). I didn’t when I was miserable in a terrible relationship, didn’t when I was single, so no, an argument with my current boyfriend would not sway me to in any way. I think the key thing here is whether or not this person has been a “best friend” prior to the relationship. If the friendship has existed for a long time, only ever been platonic, and you trust your girlfriend…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 03:07 AM
7

THIS. There are a lot of women who regularly trash other women and girls to their sons, because nobody is good enough for mommy’s little angel. This results in one of the worst types of man, imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 02:34 PM
5

Exactly. Not liking either? Probably. But there’s a clear difference in which carries a worse stigma. Selling nude photos and videos on OnlyFans may be increasingly accepted, but actually having sex for money (especially outside of the porn industry) is absolutely not. Also: while ridicule would come with both, let’s consider how a male politician outed for visiting escorts would be viewed compared to a female politician having had sex for money in their past. People would be much more vicious t…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 06:36 PM
33

What a joke. Ask any father, or hell - any mother not involved in sex work, if they’d be more upset to find out their son pays for sex OR their daughter has sex for money. Guaranteed they’d prefer the former if having to choose.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 06:10 AM
2

Really? I think pretty much every man I know has. A fair number do consistently.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/22 05:15 AM
3

I prefer to be clean shaven, actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/22 11:44 PM
5

In some cases the man makes more, in other cases the woman does. Wage gap has nothing to do with what I’m talking about, so stop reaching.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/22 02:30 PM
11

All the wealthy men I know are with age appropriate women who are pretty much their equals, both educationally and professionally.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/22 04:17 AM
3

As a woman, my experience is that my overweight friends have not gotten the same dating opportunities (in terms of the males’ attractiveness level, their willingness to be more than FWBs, etc.) as my average weight or thin friends. This does differ a bit depending on race/ethnicity of the female friends and of the males they’re attracting though.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 03:11 PM
1

I think that casual sex counts as anything prior to there being any commitment clearly agreed upon. Edit: but both of my examples include cases where my friends were not sleeping with men to obtain a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 11:00 PM
1

If you’re in an exclusive relationship, it’s not casual sex. Plenty of people with low n counts have still had an ongoing FWB situation with no intention of a relationship or had one or two casual flings. My best friend who is now married with only 2 partners ever didn’t lose her virginity until she was 22. She wasn’t traditional, she just hadn’t met anyone that she wanted it to happen with at the time. She ended up losing it to a guy in our extended friend group at the end of college (not at he…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 10:57 PM
3

30% for casual sex in the US is way undershooting. All casual sex means is that it’s outside of a committed relationship. The vast majority of women under 35 have had at least one casual sex partner. This is true for pretty much every woman with a low n-count that I know, even my long-time married friends who’ve been with only 2-4 partners and my friend who didn’t lose her virginity until she was 28.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 07:46 PM
3

I’m starting to think you have this animosity because you’ve been cheated on with, or left for, a “girl that sleeps around.” Either that or you’re actually a dude pretending to be a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 07:40 PM
2

You thought you said something profound? Wow. That’s both funny and sad. I actually don’t have a high “body count” at all lol. I’ve spent the vast majority of my teen and adult years in long-term monogamous relationships. I just don’t fault women for enjoying casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 07:32 PM
18

Honestly sounds like you don’t really enjoy sex for what it is and that it’s primarily a source of validation for you. You feel superior because you get this validation in a relationship rather than via casual sex. Typical pick-me behavior that aligns with you calling those that disagree “sluts.” If you or your boyfriend were better at sex, you might understand the counter-point being made.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 05:26 PM
1

Did I say you were OP? Jesus Christ, learn to fucking read and write. I have what I want. I’m in a loving and committed relationship with a man who isn’t emotionally stunted, sexist, and sexless. That’s much more than can be said about a lot of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 02:13 AM
1

Dude, you just said a whole lot of nothing and provided only your personal bias/bitterness to fail at proving me wrong. You don’t have the slightest idea what women want.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 01:49 AM
1

The inferiority complex is so unattractive and a large part of why y’all aren’t getting laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 06:33 PM
1

Where did I show a pro or anti-marriage stance in my comments? Whether others want to marry or not is no concern of mine. I’m in a committed relationship but not married, and don’t feel strongly about marriage for myself, let alone others. But it’s common sense that if you’re a very high earner marrying a lower earner (or someone who is or will be permanently stay at home), that you better get an iron clad prenup, regardless of if you’re a man or woman. People are arguing that there are no benef…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 06:30 PM
1

Idgaf if men get married or not or for what reasons. I was simply commenting on how what he said is untrue for why women get married.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 04:25 AM
1

Maybe, but alimony is also not commonly offered in divorces anymore. So it doesn’t apply to the majority.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 04:24 AM
9

Regardless of whether they’re more likely to fail, the fact I gave was that most women aren’t getting married to up their social class. The topic wasn’t what results in the most successful marriage. Your argument was that climbing the social/economic ladder is a main incentive for women to get married, and at this point that’s not accurate. Also, prove irreconcilable difference means “money.” That’s simplistic bs and you have zero evidence to back it up. Irreconcilable difference means the marri…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 05:56 PM
20

There is recent data showing that half of married women earn as much or more than their husbands. So I think arguing that marriage for women is largely to enter a higher social class is very dated thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 04:38 PM
–

Lol I just said I disagree. You’re the one now making it a big deal. I’m not sure how old you were, but when he was at his height, he was not considered attractive in a “quirky way.” He absolutely met general standards of attractiveness by any normal person. That doesn’t mean everyone was sexually attracted to him. Just that almost anyone would acknowledge he was a handsome/attractive man, even if he wasn’t their type. Now he’s older and he dresses a bit odd, but I’m not talking about style. I’m…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/22 12:38 AM
3

Nope, not usually. Both I and many of my female friends have received unsolicited dick pics from very attractive men we’d started talking to but not yet slept with. Instant attraction killer even then. Unsolicited dick pics immediately make us think of a certain, undesirable type of male personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 06:57 PM
3

Yeah, I remember my male friend once telling me he was exchanging nudes with a woman and she sent an up close, spread eagle pussy pic that looked like something one would take for a gyno to inspect. This friend has been with upwards of 200 women, so I’d consider his libido pretty active, but it was an immediate turn off for him.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 06:51 PM
5

Another man who clearly knows nothing about makeup but insists he does. Makeup doesn’t hide wrinkles. Fillers and Botox do, and while they’ve gotten more common they’re still not used because of lack of affordability for the average woman. They’re also something men can get without the obviousness or stigma of makeup, so it is pointless to discuss on this post. It’s also hard to use makeup to hide bad acne unless you’re highly skilled. Most of the time it makes it look worse. Also, are you an ad…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 03:59 PM
2

Okay, I strongly disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 03:53 PM
9

So Johnny Depp is not conventionally attractive? Huh? I feel like I’m in the twilight zone.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 06:18 AM
7

Psh. I’d still take a young Johnny Depp over some super sculpted/overly masculine Chad any day.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 06:17 AM
4

For the reasons I stated above, in the comment you didn’t bother to actually read before responding to.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 03:55 AM
36

This is such a tired argument. 99% of women don’t have the makeup/ artistic skills needed to “disguise” their appearance. Stop using the contouring work of Instagram MUAs as an example. It’s not realistic for the average person who doesn’t have the money for very expensive high quality makeup, the free time to spend hours doing makeup, or the skillset. If someone is unattractive bare faced, they won’t be much more attractive with a little cover up, eye shadow, lipstick, and mascara. Makeup can s…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 12:48 AM
1

FDS and TRP folks deserve each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/22 04:42 PM
1

I’m a little under 5’5”, dad is 5’10”, brothers 6’1” and 6’4”. I’ve been in long term relationships with two dudes below average in height (5’7” and 5’8”). Both had no issues attracting good looking women. Current bf is over 6 feet, which is nice but not something I care too much about. My only strong preference regarding height is that they be taller than me.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 03:39 AM
1

I don’t abuse anyone and neither do any of the women in my family or friend circle. I have been acquainted with a lot of abusive men though and the stats on violence toward women in the US would show that it’s an epidemic. Men of course get abused too, but the stats are nowhere close. From your post history you’re clearly a very depressed and angry individual who really dislikes women, so I think it’s pointless to argue with you. I do think it’s funny though, that out of all the women I know who…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/22 04:45 PM
0

I frankly don’t give a shit why someone acts like an incel. If they hate women/are misogynists I want nothing to do with them. I don’t expect men to want to spend time with women who hate men either. Even so, I could go into why the two really shouldn’t be compared, based on men’s historical treatment of women and the power imbalance, but RPers here will just go on about how that can’t possibly be a thing because women now have the ability to decide whether they want to fuck, date, or marry a gu…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/22 08:28 PM
35

IMO “player” isn’t just someone who isn’t interested in being tied down. It’s someone who enjoys making it a game in which deception and providing false hopes are a main characteristic (usually along with some misogyny). I have male friends who aren’t interested in monogamous relationships and are totally upfront and ethical about it. I wouldn’t call them players. Similarly, an incel isn’t just a guy who has trouble with women. It’s a guy who has trouble with women AND has a particular misogynis…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/22 07:16 PM
2

This has already been posted SO many times 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/22 06:54 PM
1

I think “just be yourself” means be honest about interests, goals, and who you generally are as a person, but that doesn’t mean one shouldn’t also use common sense/consider social cues. Don’t act clingy or over share off the bat or before closeness/intimacy has been naturally established (this goes for women too). Don’t have gross habits/not take care of yourself and think women won’t get turned off. Show actual interest in what the other person has to say and who they are. Perhaps “just be your…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/22 01:41 AM
3

I agree with most of what you said, but just like men- some women are very sexual AND into variety. I don’t think it automatically makes them mentally ill or conformist. Insecurity may be a factor for a good portion of women with high numbers, but that’s hardly a mental illness.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 01:01 AM
1

I already said that average guys often date up in almost every way (overall attractiveness, figure, education, and even sometimes money). Do you think an average dude deserves a 10? I mean, I’ve seen it happen but if you’re disappointed that’s not the norm I don’t know what to tell you. And again, average men with decent personalities and a little (true) confidence can get a lot of attractive women to sleep with them. I see it happen all the time. Super average dudes (in terms of looks and money…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/22 09:05 PM
9

“Just be yourself” is advice men and women have both been given for decades. It’s pretty obvious that if “being yourself” goes outside of what is considered normal, good, or appealing to others, that you’ll be cutting out a huge chunk of prospects whether relationships/sex, friendships, or jobs. It sucks but it’s certainly not exclusively something men deal with.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/22 08:59 PM
1

This sub (and a lot of Reddit) is an echo chamber for angry, sexually frustrated dudes and that’s what makes you think most men aren’t getting laid. It’s simply not true. But the terrible attitudes evident in a lot of men here makes it understandable that they aren’t having sex. Who wants to deal with that negativity? Most men who are at least average in looks (even with a little extra weight), take basic care of themselves, have a steady job, and good personality + confidence can find someone o…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/22 07:00 PM
1

Yeah, I get it. I need to spend more time on r/eyebleach after reading most of the comments here. I’m very thankful my boyfriend is nothing like the creeps on this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/22 06:50 PM
1

You read all 543 comments? If so, you definitely missed them.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/22 06:47 PM
1

There have been numerous comments on this thread where men admit to being insecure because if she’s slept with other men she’s probably been with someone hotter/better in bed/with a bigger dick.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/22 08:30 PM
0

That’s utter bullshit. Promiscuity is absolutely a common trait in men. Almost every study done on extramarital affairs shows men cheat at a higher rate than women. Most of my male family and friends have been promiscuous when single and they tend to do well with attractive women. They’re not slumming it, as you’ve implied. Even the most promiscuous women I know have numbers way lower than the promiscuous men, because promiscuity in men has been accepted for much longer and so they never had the…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/22 08:28 PM
2

Because they’re insecure and want to be the first and only so she can’t compare them to better lovers. I’ve never met a confident, grown man who’s good with women that likes the idea of fucking virgins.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/22 02:06 AM
-6

You don’t have to explain yourself or your choices to toxic idiots. There are plenty of progressive men who don’t care about superficial things like that. You’d likely not give the time of day to the creeps who think it’s okay to diminish a person’s entire value because of their own outdated, sexist ideas. I don’t know many men who think this way and are generally considered desirable by women. They’re like this because they’re bitter and feel rejected by women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/22 02:01 AM
2

This differs for each person. For instance, I saw a number of responses from other women regarding how their ideal man would look that are not the case for me at all. I’m not into extremely bulky/muscular guys, but very skinny or fat is also not attractive to me. Fit enough and proportional is ideal. Tall is nice, but as long as the man is at least a few inches taller than me (I’m just under 5’5”) it’s not a big deal. I’d take a proportional, 5’7” dude with a handsome/cute face over a disproport…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 07:17 PM
7

When I was single: 1) overall attraction to the person: this includes looks, of course, but the person also has to be respectful and good natured, have confidence, and funny/interesting definitely helps. There’s a little more flexibility than with men I’d consider actually dating/entering a relationship with, but if they’re way outside my usual type, I probably wouldn’t want to have sex regardless of how objectively good looking they were. For instance, a typical former frat/finance dude will ge…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 06:24 PM
3

Any number of things. Someone caught the other cheating or involved in some other divorce-able offense. Or they realized they didn’t actually want/enjoy married life and only did it for the desire of a wedding/because they felt pressured to by their partner, family, friends, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/22 04:36 PM
1

It can be painful to get out of, sure. But it’s not locked. If it were, half of marriages wouldn’t end in divorce. Not to mention that you can still separate and date/fuck other people without legally divorcing (or without even separating, tons of married people cheat). Also, the idea that someone would stay with you only because divorce is too much work/money to bother isn’t exactly a positive advertisement for marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/22 04:31 PM
2

Nope. Ever seen King of Queens? The Jim Belushi sitcom (According to Jim), Still Standing, etc? I know a shit ton of real life couples just like that. That is, middle to lower-middle class households with an overweight husband and his thinner, hotter wife. Generally these men are self-assured, have good/funny personalities, and are reliable. That’s what got them their better looking halfs, not money.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/22 04:27 PM
10

Because it’s always been accepted that frumpy or even fat men can pull fit, attractive women if they have other desirable qualities.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/22 01:23 AM
10

I never said that divorce rates were higher than breakups. The point is that longevity doesn’t require marriage, and marriage doesn’t automatically equal longevity. And it’s not just in the west. The Maldives, Kazakhstan, Russia, and China all have significantly higher divorce rates than the US. And countries with lower divorce rates don’t necessarily have happier marriages. They may just have religious or cultural constructs in place that make divorce so stigmatized people would rather spend th…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/22 01:16 AM
7

They aren’t the same. You can be together the rest of your lives and not get married. I know couples like this. You can get married and be divorced in a year. I also know couples like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/22 12:54 AM
20

Marriage isn’t “locked” either. Have you seen divorce rates?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/22 12:48 AM
3

Of course any good relationship is going to have give and take from both partners. But the transactional relationship you’re talking about, which is based in fairness/balance rather than only one person benefiting from a relationship, is very different than what OP and a lot of other men in this sub are talking about, which is: women only get into relationships for financial/security benefits and don’t actually have sexual/emotional attraction to those partners. They think that women only desire…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 05:37 PM
6

I don’t “need to ask myself what I’m doing in a relationship” because it’s something I easily know and don’t have to ponder. I’m in a relationship because I love my boyfriend, enjoy his company, intimacy, and the kind of sex that comes with a trusting, loving partnership. I have sex with him because I want to a) for my own pleasure and b) because I enjoy and want to make the person I love feel cared for, sexually desired and satisfied. I don’t need him for material reasons and would literally ra…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 03:43 AM
16

BS. I’m in a relationship and have sex because I want to, not to get anything else in return. I have my own resources, I don’t need to fuck to get someone else’s.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 06:09 PM
5

There’s a difference between step dad and a man who’s chosen to take on all aspects of fatherhood (as the only dad) since birth or early in the child’s life. This isn’t uncommon. I know multiple men in my family and friend group who are not biological fathers but are also not considered step fathers because 1) there was a fertility issue that led to using a sperm bank, or 2) they got together with the woman while she was pregnant or recently had a baby but the bio dad never planned to be in the …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 08:22 PM
1

This is of course subjective, as I think Tom Holland has a lot of fans who think he’s well above average. Also worth noting, I think there are men who are below average height who are still well above average attractiveness, and men with less fit bodies than his who are also above average attractiveness. It really is about the overall package, and personality/confidence can certainly change how attractive a man appears. Not if you have Eric’s face though.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/22 08:28 PM
3

I find Chris Brown so unattractive. Truly can’t stand his face. Odell Beckham Jr. probably has one of the most perfect faces I’ve seen. Trevante Rhodes is extremely attractive but I think it would be easier to find his doppelgänger in a regular (but obviously hot) non-famous person.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/22 03:12 AM
1

Same
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/22 03:07 AM
4

Attractive- Peter Gadiot (Adam on Yellowjackets) Average- Tom Holland’s face (his physique is above average as I’ve seen pics of him with a 6 pack, but his height, at 5’8”, is below average). All together he’s still probably a little above average and I’m sure lots of women find him very cute. I think he’s meh though. Unattractive- Erik Trump. Politics aside, that dude has one ugly mug.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/22 02:58 AM
19

Right? Even if you’re not personally attracted to someone like JGL (I used to be but am not anymore) an objective person should be able to see he is reasonably attractive and certainly above average. Someone not being your type does not = average or unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/22 02:47 AM
10

No. 30s here. I still have time to have a child (wouldn’t want more than one). 95% of my friends with kids only started having them in the last year or two. While long-term partnership is important to me, marriage isn’t something I care much about and I think I’d probably be more comfortable not doing it. I am SO glad I didn’t have a kid in my twenties (or up until now). It would have screwed things up for me in so many ways. I almost certainly wouldn’t own a home, have a savings, a master’s, an…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/22 04:34 PM
1

Yes. I have and I am. To me, dating down isn’t directly linked to income, but it is linked to whether or not someone has a career, or at least a decent career plan. If they’re well into adulthood and don’t have either, then that’s an issue. If they’re jumping from job to job and/or are not able to support themselves and also have a little money to go out and do things occasionally, that’s unappealing to me because it’s very different than how I am.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/22 05:11 AM
4

Yeah, I concede that if this is something a person faces consistently over a long period of time- it may be due to aiming above one’s league, but it could also be attraction to a very specific type of man (a lot of women have self sabotaging behaviors in dating where they repeatedly go for emotionally or otherwise unavailable men because of their own attachment or self esteem issues). It could also be that they appear enticing to these men early on but a personality trait or behavior subsequentl…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/22 06:52 AM
11

Nah. I’ve seen a lot of situations where really (objectively) attractive women who were into very average looking (but confident) men could not get the guy to commit to a relationship. A lot of guys would rather play the field, if they have a reasonable shot at doing so, than settle down.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/22 05:02 AM
3

This.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 04:40 PM
1

Oh, just shut the fuck up already. Your argument and baseless attacks are pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 06:08 PM
1

The majority doesn’t have to be living in poverty, be on Medicaid, etc. The majority don’t get abortions. A good majority of women seeking abortions ARE living in poverty, unable to care for a child for any of the number of reasons I’ve stated. Is it bad that 425k children are living in foster care? Are you dumb? The foster care system is a travesty. Children in it regularly face abuse, neglect, and sexual assault. The caseworkers handling them are severely overworked, underpaid, and can’t adequ…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 06:07 PM
1

The vast majority of pregnant women desiring abortions to fit into one or more of the worst cases I described, which I’ve already given stats for in another comment. Stop talking I circles.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 06:00 PM
0

I was vegan long before Forks Over Knives, so no, I haven’t watched it. I don’t use aquafaba and it’s not a commonly used ingredient in vegan mayo. Also, you know that non vegans eat chickpeas too right? I barely eat potatoes. You know who eats a shit ton of potato products? Meat and potato types, not vegans who tend to have a much more varied diet. You’re so fucking dumb it hurts. Everything you mentioned is eaten by non-vegans too. The Guardian explaining a comprehensive study that wasn’t fund…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 05:58 PM
1

The person I was responding to said she’d “rather keep an unwanted child than have part of her genitals removed”. Since we’re talking about male circumcision, and since the vast majority of male circumcisions do not result in complications, I think it is perfectly fair to say she’s coming from a privileged place to prefer to keep an unwanted child (and presumably not ruin both her and the child’s lives) by picking that over what would most likely be a loss of sensation. I’ve already explained th…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 05:09 AM
1

Why would we focus on happily pregnant women when we’re talking about abortion issues? Clearly by the number of abortions occurring every year, a large percentage of pregnant women are unhappy about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 05:03 AM
1

It’s pretty fucking obvious if you bother to open your eyes. Most women who opt for abortions are dealing with the above. 21.4 million women are living in poverty in America and cannot afford an unwanted pregnancy or child. 37% of pregnant women in America are on Medicaid, which requires being very low income. 1 in 6 American children live in food-insecure households. Unwanted pregnancies often result in child neglect and abuse. Ever worked for social services? I have. There are 425,000 children…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 04:58 AM
1

I didn’t say those were the worst cases. But that’s the most likely negative effect of having been circumcised.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 04:40 AM
1

Nobody is telling happily pregnant women to get abortions. Wtf are you talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 04:38 AM
2

You’re privileged because you couldn’t consider all the circumstances that women are in that would make having an unwanted child ruin their lives more than losing some sensation. Nowhere did I say I don’t care about men suffering. Stop making emotional, non-factual statements to beef up your weak argument. I didn’t bring up abortion. I commented that you need to stop comparing it to the abortion debate after you brought it up. I already said I’m not pro-circumcision. I just think you’re a pick-m…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 01:19 AM
0

Did I mention any Netflix documentaries? Nope. How the fuck does your first link support that veganism is ruining the planet? It doesn’t. It just points to reduce tillaging methods being beneficial for earthworms. Your second link is a blog, so yes I’ll dismiss it as just as worthless as a YouTube video. Stop wasting my time. LOL- The third link shows that a certain technique of grazing can help reduce greenhouse gasses compared to what ranchers (you know, of cattle) are currently using (which i…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 01:11 AM
1

I compared them because the numbers of the worst cases for circumcised men pale in comparison to the number of women who face the circumstances I stated above. And as you seem to forget, it’s the women and their babies that are negatively affected by lack of access to abortion. Nobody gives a shit if you’re privileged enough to prefer having an unwanted child than having less sexual sensitivity. Don’t compare the circumcision debate to abortion and expect to be taken seriously. I used to think I…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 09:43 PM
1

So the consequences for the millions of men who are perfectly happy to have been circumcised and have healthy, happy sex lives are worse than those for the millions of women who might be facing an unwanted pregnancy while (pick any/all) living in poverty, in abusive relationships they can’t get out of, pregnant by rape/incest, seriously struggling with mental health or physical illness, or likely to give birth to babies with serious genetic disorders / disabilities that make them likely to face …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 09:29 PM
0

You posted a YouTube video posted by Garland Farms. Either you’re trolling or dumb as shit. Either way, I don’t debate with people who think YouTube videos are reliable sources.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 08:39 PM
0

My feelings aren’t hurt in the slightest. I just don’t think you live in reality. And that link is a fucking joke. Good day.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 08:26 PM
2

Lol perfect response from someone who doesn’t have anything to back up their claims. But, if we’re going by anecdotal evidence then mine is just as good as yours. I’ve already heavily implied that I have asked women. The loudest anti-circumcision activists generally are women. I’ve asked a lot of men about this and the vast majority either feel strongly that they want their sons circumcised or they have no strong opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 05:52 PM
2

It has a LOT to do with the consequences. That you don’t understand or see that means you’re very short-sighted.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 05:36 PM
2

Please provide proof for that percentage.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 05:34 PM
1

Yeah, I am vegan and know a shit ton of other vegans. It literally doesn’t even come up until someone notices we aren’t eating something (or are eating something that looks different) and decides to be pushy about it OR another meat eater decides to announce it for us. You severely underestimate the number of obnoxious meat eaters who like to shit talk and ask invasive questions with no provocation. We’re also literally inundated with shit pushed from the meat and dairy industry, like in all asp…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 05:33 PM
1

I respect your feeling strongly against male circumcision, but there is something extremely off-putting about a woman shit talking and making generalizations about other women the way you do. Comparing the discussion on abortion to male circumcision is idiotic. The lifelong implications (for multiple lives) of not being able to get an abortion are nowhere near the same as being circumcised.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 05:26 PM
1

Oh shut up. 99% of vegans I know don’t bring up being vegan until asked. Meat eaters then love forcing the questions and talking about bacon and how they could never give up cheese, when nobody even asked.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 05:22 PM
3

Stop putting it all on women. Every woman I know who isn’t strongly anti-circ has left the decision up to the baby’s father. You may think that’s not good enough, and fine, but fathers play a big part in this too.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 05:17 PM
2

The point isn’t whether you care that they want to hang out with you. The point is that you assume they don’t exist because anyone who isn’t also a deceptive and bitter little troll with a medieval mindset steers clear of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/21 05:02 PM
3

Lol feminists are definitely not the ones fucking dudes who look and act like them. Ew.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/21 04:53 PM
1

It’s always the actual beta males calling other, respectable men “betas” or “simps.” Those faking feminism just to get laid are pathetic and women can smell the phoniness a mile away. Of course it didn’t work for them. But there are actually intelligent, non-predatory men out there who care about other humans and believe in feminist principles without ulterior motives. They just don’t want to hang out with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/21 04:46 PM
5

As a native English speaker I’ll say that the question mark she added might not technically be correct, but it does convey a tone/attitude that is different than if she just wanted to thank someone. It seems that is what she intended and it was effective. Also, it’s silly to nitpick something so small.. especially when she wasn’t responding to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 01:27 AM
3

I’ve traveled throughout the world and have spent months on end with my European family in numerous European countries. Stop being hyperbolic. She would be considered overweight but nobody would be so shocked they’d stare. People are generally getting fatter throughout the western world. It’s just worse in the US.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/21 04:52 PM
1

People may choose to go to therapy for any reason and any period of time. Assuming it’s not court-mandated or the person isn’t in the midst of a major depressive episode or breakdown of some sort (in which case they do need to focus on themselves and not dating), I see this as a positive indicator that a man isn’t afraid to seek help, get in touch with emotions, and work on self-improvement. None of that is a red flag.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/21 05:19 AM
5

We’re talking about two different things. It’s only a bribe if the woman intentionally goes out with a man she has zero interest in so that he will pay for her meal. This is NOT the norm. Stop obsessing over FDS types and maybe expand your horizons beyond RP tropes. I, and the women I know, make enough of our own money. I don’t need to be wasting my time on a boring date with some dude I don’t like for a handout. Nothing about that is appealing to any sane person who isn’t literally starving. Wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/21 07:38 PM
3

Being unsure isn’t the same as “I really don’t like you.”
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/21 05:26 PM
1

I do not necessarily know whether or not I want “to touch a man” after a first date. I definitely don’t before the first date if we haven’t yet met in person. Personality, demeanor, and looks all determine whether I want to have sex and not all three are totally apparent after one date. That said, I also wouldn’t generally accept people paying for me during our first meet-up because I don’t want to feel pressured or guilted into sex I’m not sure I want. If they insisted and I KNEW I wanted to sl…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/21 05:24 PM
3

The way you wrote this is unclear. Do you mean low income women expecting high income men? Yes, that’s hypocritical too.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 09:13 PM
1

I mean, when we speak in generalities I think it’s easy to claim that most people in the dating pool, whether male or female, don’t meet all the standards i just listed. I obviously can’t speak for your experience but when talking about people I actually know rather than stereotypes, that’s just not the case for any of the women who are single or were at one point single in their 30s/40s, that I’m around. Granted, most of my friends who have kids are currently married, so if they ever get divorc…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 09:11 PM
1

Because the men I dated also wanted actual relationships with me. Even more so than when I was in my early 20s. I’ve never had an issue attracting male attention but I’d say the interest I’ve received in my thirties has been more serious, from better quality men, and that I am likely considered more attractive now (I’ve maintained the same weight but I think the loss of baby face was actually a good thing for me). For my friends who found themselves single and dating in their thirties, the resul…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 04:16 PM
2

I mean, I do that but also have sex and relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 07:51 AM
1

Going out to dinner and drinks, movies, museums, going dancing, seeing live music, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 01:46 AM
1

When I started dating again, every dude I went out with was trying to lock it down with me. I was honestly pretty surprised as I was nervous putting myself out there after being in a relationship for so long. But I was still reeling from my break up and just wanted to get back out there/couldn’t handle the idea of serious commitment at the time. But I highly doubt I’m some anomaly. Women in their thirties and forties who have their shit together, are reasonably mentally sound, and take decent ph…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 01:43 AM
5

Yes, especially compared to those in my teens and twenties.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/21 07:07 AM
14

I was in a relationship for all of my 20s and very early thirties. Became single and had absolutely no issues getting dates with men older, my age, and younger. The wall is a myth that bitter current and former incels repeat online to make themselves feel better.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/21 03:04 AM
1

Same.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/21 01:27 AM
3

Your “90% of eggs are gone by 30” doesn‘t pack the punch you think it does when females start out with around a million at birth and only have 300,000 at the start of puberty. So by about 12 most girls have already lost 70% of their eggs. At 35, the average woman still has around 80,000 eggs left.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/21 04:35 AM
4

So then just because older men have more money/stability (and possibly more maturity) than they did when they were young, thus making them more attractive to women than they’d previously been, doesn’t mean they’ve physically aged well or better than the average woman has. That’s the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/21 02:29 AM
8

Lol. You keep coming up with excuses for why most men don’t look good as they age (getting married, having kids, job stress, bad diet, etc.) but for women it’s all because “they age like milk” and not for any of the reasons listed for men. Pathetic. George Clooney may still be fairly handsome for his age, but nobody would argue he’s objectively more handsome now than he was in his 20s, 30s (despite his awful haircut which was on trend at the time) or 40s. He has aged a LOT and not for the better…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/21 02:14 AM
21

Maybe you’re as great looking/improved with age as you say you are, I really don’t know or care. The fact is MOST men don’t get better looking with age. Maybe some who previously had baby faces become more “manly” (which can be more attractive to some women) in their thirties, but there’s definitely a point where most get less conventionally attractive. For every man I know who has gotten hotter after 30, there’s a woman who has also either gotten hotter, or who has always been attractive and ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/21 10:17 PM
9

Absolutely not.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/21 05:02 AM
3

The only men who would bother to do this are the men that women already don’t want. Why would men who are good with women do this? To throw incels a bone? Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/21 11:54 PM
2

Average age of childbirth doesn’t really matter when so many children are born out of wedlock now. And yeah, I guess I’m going by urban/metropolitan standards and not middle America. For those living in urban centers, and those who have higher levels of education/income, getting married that young isn’t of much interest.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/21 05:09 AM
5

Very few women I know, including the currently married ones, wanted to get married before 28.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/21 04:16 AM
6

This is creepy. Regardless of whether it was okay for a really old man to say when he was young, that doesn’t make it appropriate for them to say to a waitress likely a quarter to half their age. Also, what’s “old?” 95? Okay, maybe? But still creepy due to the age factor. If a 70something year old man is saying this, they absolutely know better. This isn’t something that was really acceptable to say to random waitresses when my dad or uncles were young and definitely not by middle age. They’d ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/21 03:29 PM
1

Lol. Yes people with impulse control are more likely to engage in a lot of things and be risky about it. That’s pretty obvious. But people with these very serious diagnoses are, overall, a very small percentage of the general population. Using that for commentary on the much larger percentage of people who engage in consensual, casual sex at one point or another in their lives is pointless. Any implication that because psychopaths and narcissists are more likely to have casual sex means it’s a b…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/21 04:56 AM
0

Implying that it’s only unacceptable for WOMEN to have casual sex is shitting on women. This person could have just said they don’t understand how anyone can have casual sex. But they didn’t. They made it about it being wrong for women. Sorry you have trouble with reading words.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/21 04:31 AM
1

I have a pretty low count and have been in multiple long term, monogamous relationships you dumb fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/21 04:30 AM
1

None of the women I know would ever freak out about that. Most people I know feel porn is fairly normal to indulge in as long as it isn’t excessive/an addiction. Unless you’re surrounding yourself with deeply insecure (and I’m honestly not even that secure but dgaf), very traditional/religious women, I don’t see what would give you the impression that most women feel that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/21 04:26 AM
1

It’s all one extreme or the other with your type. I’ve already stated my issue is with men like you thinking women should immediately have sex with you. Nobody said anyone should be expected to wait extended periods of time without sexual interest being shown and a sexual relationship starting. It’s almost as if there’s something in between having sex on the first date or two and making someone wait months. I also never said it’s common for people to be repulsed or think someone is ugly and then…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/21 04:20 AM
1

Well, in college a lot of people are interested in experimenting. However, I’m sure there are many others who are cautious of having casual sex for a variety of reasons and feel the way OP does. Certain online dating apps also make it much easier to gage compatibility. There are people out there who feel the same way as OP, and they should go looking for them. Just stop acting like those who want to have sex before getting to know everything about another person are 1) wrong or have poor values …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 07:08 PM
1

No, it’s not. What about that is reasonable? Sounds like inferiority complex to me. Not the woman’s problem. Maybe you’d have less issues with women if you exhibited more true confidence. Stop blaming others for what you lack.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 07:04 PM
7

Man, your reading comprehension is poor. Someone is a predator if they feel they are owed sex or if someone’s past sex life with others means they are then entitled to sex. Of course you don’t want to be with someone who has no interest in sex with you. Nobody wants a dead bedroom. What’s ridiculous is thinking that a woman’s past sexual experience (which you likely don’t know much about) dictates how they’ll feel about sex with you very early on in your dating. I personally wouldn’t want to wai…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 05:42 PM
-3

“But seems to be a minority view of how people look at sex these days.” Probably because it’s 2021 and shitting on women only for casual sex is considered pretty misogynistic and gross by most emotionally mature adults. Worry about what your own genitals are doing and not those of other consenting adults.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 05:29 PM
1

It’s not less likely. In urban areas and areas where people tend to be less religious, most people have casual sex when they’re single and trying to find a partner. I know very few people who didn’t have casual sex prior to marriage/serious relationships, or sex with their now partners very early on. Most people want to know what sex with someone is like before committing. Sex is important to a lot of people and being stuck with no sexual chemistry/a bad sex life is miserable. Just look at peopl…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 05:22 PM
8

Your first and second paragraphs seem pretty contradictory. Does your first paragraph only apply to men, while your second only applies to women?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 05:11 PM
2

Most women don’t think of regular porn as cheating. It’s only concerning when it becomes an addiction that negatively affects how often/how you have sex with/treat your partner. However, using a site where you’re actually able to interact with porn stars/sex workers would be considered cheating by most women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 05:10 PM
4

Please show me proof that most women have ONSs. Then show me that those who have do it regularly. Further, do you feel obligated to do everything someone else wants you to just because you’ve done it in the past? Are mood, feelings, level of attraction, change of opinion/lifestyle, changes in hormones/libido, being on your period, etc. not a thing? Any man who thinks a woman should automatically sleep with them because a small amount of interest has been shown and they’ve previously had casual s…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/21 05:05 PM
1

“Men also won’t openly criticize a woman’s appearance.” This is bs. What world do you live in?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 07:14 PM
6

I mean other than being bald and having a beard he looks nothing like Brian Laundrie. His features, head/face shape, and coloring are totally different.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/21 02:08 AM
0

That’s literally my point. Be up front so that both of you can be aware from the get go that you’re not compatible. Unless you’re dating very young and/or very insecure women (I have no idea how old you are) they’re unlikely to lie about this just to appease you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/21 05:56 AM
0

Show me where I said it was hateful. I’ll wait.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/21 05:54 AM
1

So then it’s probably likely that the sex lives/preferences of successful and rich people vary as much as the less rich and successful. Except that you could argue rich/successful people have easier access and a higher number of people willing to have sex with them, which might lead many to be more promiscuous.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/21 05:54 AM
11

Some of the most successful people I know (in terms of achievement and wealth) have had the most sex, the craziest types of sex, and with the most people. Your assessment is not based on reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/21 10:27 PM
2

Just straight up ask her. I know I wouldn’t ever want to date someone who feels the way you do (even though my history has largely been long-term, monogamous relationships), and a woman who is okay with / has partaken in casual relationships most likely won’t either and will a) either answer honestly and you’ll both realize you’re not compatible, or 2) not bother answering but end any further interaction right there (which is what I’d do). Nobody wants to be with someone who looks down on them f…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/21 10:24 PM
4

It’s more privileged to be a cis person than a trans person. That someone living as a cis woman got more romantic/sexual attention than they did when living as a trans man, when a large % of the population say they are not romantically/sexually interested in dating trans people, should make this an obvious one.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/21 04:51 PM
20

I think it’s often the opposite. They don’t have conventionally attractive features but they have an attractive personality, confidence, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/21 01:46 PM
3

”So yes, the "be grateful for what you have and always do the right thing no matter how detrimental that might be to you" and the "pull yourself by your bootstraps" are both fucking miserable.” I’m genuinely curious what liberal policies, talking points, etc. you think infer the above statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/21 12:39 AM
3

Um, I’m sorry but what? You’re seriously saying liberals are the ones primarily promoting “you deserve nothing in life”? You must not live on the same planet I do, where conservatives don’t think basic social safety nets, bodily autonomy, or non- heterosexual/cis people/marriages are valid. They’re the “pull yourself up by your bootstraps” party that believes only the wealthy are hard working and deserving of more than scraps.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/21 07:46 PM
1

I’m so confused. Those are not the pictures I’m seeing.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/21 09:18 PM
2

It‘s a pretty mixed area outside of a major urban metropolis but bigger butts was the preference of teenage boys of all races at my high school.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/21 09:17 PM
5

I’m 34 and everyone was obsessed with butts when I was in my teens, at least where I grew up.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/21 05:54 PM
1

While I respect people’s choice to be polyamorous (with consent) on an individual level, I think a widespread trend toward non-monogamy would have negative ramifications. I’m not going to say which is more “natural” for humans as a whole, but I don’t think I’d ever want to be in a non-monogamous romantic relationship because it’s not natural for me. However, when I’ve been single I was happy to date around and have non-exclusive, purely sexual relationships. Once feelings get involved, I need mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/21 11:30 PM
2

Are you talking about the photos OP posted? They both say age 32 and you can see “C’mon” at the bottom of one screenshot and the top of the other. What am I missing?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/21 04:08 PM
1

Well, that’s why I said it’s a generalization. There are clearly exceptions.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/21 12:10 AM
1

So it’s about the social awareness and quality/depth of social interactions making them “socially superior,” rather than more surface level metrics like number of acquaintances/friends/general popularity.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/21 11:57 PM
2

Based on the above comment, it seems they’re saying women’s social interactions are more complex/nuanced. So it’s easier for women to understand the nuance in others’ communication compared to men (men communicate more simply/straight forward so don’t pick up on subtleties/social or emotional cues as easily). This is obviously a generalization (like everything in this sub) but I think there is truth to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/21 11:55 PM
1

I think you’re misunderstanding what is meant by socially superior. Dark triad personalities are certainly not that, no matter how much superficial charm they might have.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/21 11:46 PM
3

It appears to be the same woman since the text continues from one pic to the next. I think she just filtered the shit out of herself in the up close photo.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/21 11:41 PM
1

Out of everything on her profile, that should come across as the least concerning. She reminds me of angry dudes on dating apps. Negative and bitter seeming, focuses on what she doesn’t want, and basically insults potential matches before even interacting with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/21 11:38 PM
1

I have only hung around leftists my entire life and have never heard anyone claim such a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/21 05:22 AM
3

Maybe women know within the first ten seconds they don’t want to bang YOU and men like you, but your claim is not something you can attribute to all or even most women. And keep coping with what? I’m not the one who’s bitter and stereotyping an entire gender because I’m considered unlikable by the opposite sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 01:18 AM
3

I see, you’re just another dude who knows jack shit about women and can’t answer a simple question.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 01:09 AM
5

Are you a woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/21 06:09 AM
1

Agreed. My roommate and I were briefly on OKC in 2008ish and the majority of men were awful. Sending unsolicited, lewd pictures/messages, blowing up at you if you didn’t respond or want to meet up immediately, negging, outright racist (to my half Asian roommate), etc. When I got back on years later, online dating was normalized and the men were of a much higher quality.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/21 03:59 PM
3

I know quite a few women who partake in carpentry as a hobby. It’s not the same thing as working in construction as your career.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/21 02:17 PM
2

Maybe. But I do live in an urban metro area that is very “hot” right now (major vacation destination and people moving here in droves) and am from an even larger city, with friends working in retail in various parts of the country. I also travel quite a bit, so I think I have a good gauge on what’s currently trending in women’s fashion. ‘70s retro is definitely in, though it is not the only style that is.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 03:05 PM
1

These are the stores that help set trends and they don’t keep things that don’t sell. I’ve seen plenty of people wearing them, and as someone who is part of the demographic (and spends a lot of time with others in said demographic) it’s marketed to, I think my opinion may be a little more informed.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 05:24 PM
1

This one? Go to any of the most common, popular women’s clothing store sites and you’ll see flares/bell bottoms: Zara, Forever 21, Express, Abercrombie. You’ll also find them on popular online clothing stores like Shein and ASOS. You can still find tie dye shirts in Target and Walmart. It’s not the only style in fashion but it’s certainly made another come back.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 03:29 PM
0

And on their drivers licenses.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 06:56 AM
1

Bell bottoms and tie dye are actually both in style right now. You can find them in almost any woman’s clothing store.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 06:44 AM
5

That’s silly. I’ve never known a woman who particularly wanted or expected a man to be nearly ten inches taller than her. Most women I know just want a man to be taller than them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 06:09 AM
3

🙄 Ever heard of Hedy Lamarr? Why don’t you thank women for wifi, Bluetooth, and GPS since without the technology she invented, none of those things would exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 11:43 PM
11

What a joke. If you really think men directly contribute to society more than women, your head is in the clouds. So fighting (and creating) wars and doing more stand up is a bigger contribution than teaching the next generation (we’re not just talking mothers, most teachers are women)? Women are also the main caregivers for the neediest in society (nurses, social workers, caregivers for the elderly, psychologists, daycare workers) and are becoming more educated than men. They haven’t historicall…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 03:42 PM
1

Exactly.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 03:24 PM
10

Or it’s just that we’re waiting to decide whether we actually want/are ready to fuck that person. Assuming it’s game playing or even “weeding the bad ones out” is dumb. This idea that “women know within (insert very short period of time) whether they want to sleep with a guy” is bs. How well you know the guy, your chemistry (which can take time to build), your mood, recent experiences with men, etc. can all factor in to whether a woman wants to wait or sleep with a new man.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/21 03:54 PM
8

You’re 21 and your parent have been married 50+ years?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 03:30 AM
-1

Oh man, this sounds like a lot of whining. Both men and women generally have expectations for how attractive their partner is, how that partner makes them feel, and what they have to offer in a relationship. There are plenty of women who like neurotic nerdy types. They just might not be the type of women those men are aiming for.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/21 06:18 PM
2

This makes sense. I’m also from a large urban area and it’s not unusual for people to not even have cars there. It may be more important to people who grew up/live in suburbs/rural areas where you have to own a car to get by, but I’ve just never cared what type of car a guy drives.
/r/seduction14/05/21 10:11 PM
3

100% agreed. Don’t know why you’re getting downvoted.
/r/seduction14/05/21 10:06 PM
1

Dressing well can improve your physical appearance. I don’t think a car does that. All that matters to me is that it’s reliable. A car isn’t even necessarily a sign of success or wealth as I know many people who have money but just don’t care to have a car for anything other than practical purposes. Plenty of wealthy dudes driving 12 year old Hondas and Toyotas.
/r/seduction14/05/21 10:04 PM
1

Right? Dudes who are really that successful with women generally don’t have to brag about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/21 08:40 PM
2

Is this really that difficult to understand? Conventionally hot men are easier to have an instant, if shallow, sexual attraction to. Men who are not as conventionally attractive become so based on other aspects, like their personality. It can take a bit longer to build up that sexual attraction. The bonus is, if it happens it’ll likely be longer lasting than attraction just based on looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/21 08:11 PM
2

Because unlike men, women are much less likely to get off during sex. So might as well be able to look at someone really handsome.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/21 07:06 PM
11

Thank you. Disturbing it got so many upvotes considering that was the second sentence.
/r/seduction12/05/21 02:11 PM
3

Get lost, narc.
/r/seduction08/05/21 12:17 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter