TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

prismaticbeans Archive

View 0 posts and 174 comments by prismaticbeans on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

It's pointless if you're only there to convince others that you're right. You'll be walking into the exact gridlock you describe. If you're actually open to finding out what you could be wrong about (or why your experience doesn't ring true for everyone, I don't care who you are, that is always applicable) then you're off to a better start.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/22 07:39 PM
1

Yes, more than once. But it depends why it was lost and what changed.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/22 08:02 PM
5

Loud and clear. Married ladies: is your husband failing to get the job done? Does he have ED, or too many pesky emotional problems to be the stud you need & deserve? Is he masturbating too much and fucking too little, or does he not eat your pussy anymore? No problem! Just find someone else! Trying for a baby and it just won't take? No big deal, try another dude's dick when your husband's not around, because this is the current decade and marriage isn't about fidelity anymore! You thought cheati…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 02:43 AM
1

I would be extremely amused and want to see the footage. I would never stop teasing him about it either. If he regretted it, I would leave it alone and not bug him too much but knowing him the way I do, I doubt that would happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/22 04:19 AM
4

And how would you know he's a virgin? What you gonna do, check his hymen? 😆
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 10:50 PM
1

I don't really like the term but I do somewhat care. It's not a dealbreaker though. More of a yellow flag.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 06:17 PM
2

She might not know what works either. A lot of women haven't had a man make much attempt beyond sticking his dick in her in whatever position he happens to like. There's trial and error. If she doesn't outright tell you what to do, she likely doesn't know what will work until you've tried it. If you actually touch her, she can tell you what she wants more of, or less of. Maybe the women that don't tell you, have never cum with a partner yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 02:46 PM
7

Not always, some have more glandular tissue. Plus people gain weight first in different areas depending on the person, and same is true for weight loss.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/22 06:09 PM
20

If women are falling asleep during sex with you then you get what you deserve.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/22 06:06 PM
3

Because it sounded like you were disagreeing with there having been a focus on male genitalia whereas female genitalia have for a long time been a less acceptable topic of discussion in the mainstream. I'm saying that ties right into the reasons for women's anatomy not having been studied much.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 12:09 AM
4

I don't know where you live, but not shaming women for their genitals is a fairly new thing. Growing up in the 90s and 2000s, it was extremely common. Shaming about labia size, colour, looseness, calling women sluts based on the look of their pussy. Labiaplasties were booming. There were cosmetic products of questionable safety to make labia look pinker. Shaming women for having pubes or body hair was big too. Body shaming was gross then, and it's gross now. Just like it's gross when it's done t…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 11:12 PM
5

Do you not see the connection? Deeming our bodies too vulgar (or conversely, too "sacred") to look at, or treating our differences as scientifically irrelevant and yet socially so critical. The cognitive dissonance involved. This is why it's taken as long as it has to recognize that we have anatomical and metabolic differences. We have existed in our different bodies since before the dawn of modern medicine. Every well-known early male scientist and doctor came out of a vagina. It's not a secret…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 10:53 PM
3

Or else the "very hot guys" aren't on their radar unless they see them in a movie, because they go for guys they are attracted to, who are also attainable, and then are unavailable because they are coupled with those guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 10:25 PM
3

(I'm on mobile so please forgive the formatting) Yes, only one gender has to raise a child that's not his. It's not right, and I don't condone it. It can ruin lives. I also believe that if a woman initially agrees with her partner that any unintended pregnancies will be terminated, it's morally wrong for her to backtrack when it actually happens and decide to keep it instead. This is of course provided she finds out within the necessary timeframe and is readily able to access abortion. And it's …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 06:01 AM
10

Or men who care to avoid being "foodie called" (I'm sorry but that term is funny as fuck) shouldn't pay for meals, and women who don't want NSA sex, shouldn't have sex on first dates.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 12:33 AM
2

Of course, but that's not something that's unique to women. It's only unique in the context of pregnancy being high-investment (and non-transferable.)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 12:25 AM
3

Would it be better if he stayed after cheating? Depends on who you ask and what you mean by "stay". There's a considerable difference between coming clean and trying to make things right...not demanding unearned trust or affection, versus staying but hiding the fact that he cheated while expecting the same fidelity and emotional investment from his partner as always, versus staying in the sense of being physically present to take her or the child to appointments, feeding, changing, and raising t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 10:53 PM
7

A man getting you pregnant and then leaving you for the woman he cheated with. Or worse, getting both of you pregnant. Or losing interest and being a deadbeat in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 05:31 PM
5

Autism does not primarily affect boys. It presents differently in girls. Also, men having to bear responsibility for women's actions through history? Women couldn't vote, own property, decide whether to bear children, etc. until recent history. So it's not as though it's a unidirectional phenomenon. Neither is having kids in your 30s and 40s. Older men's sperm causes more defects too. Sounds like you're suggesting that older women shouldn't reproduce because age increases autism risk in the offs…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 10:50 PM
4

You wouldn't be seen in public with a fat person because of some strangers imagined opinions. You're not really one to comment on other people's situation being sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 05:39 PM
1

How thirsty are your friends and what kind of fucked up circles do you roll in where "not a serial killer" is too high of a standard? How many of your bros have been asked out by a sexy murderer? If your dicks have that strong of a hold on you I pity you and your loved ones who are clearly next in line 💀💀💀
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/22 04:50 AM
1

Women having more options on average does not erase men's veto power over who they fuck or date. A woman's hotness or her "yes" don't magically suck men into her vagina and trap them there forever.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/22 04:43 AM
1

Fuck no, for one thing because I don't know many women I would consider to have good taste in men. I obviously need to be attracted to my partner, but I strongly prefer other people to stay out of my business. So no, I'm not picking on the basis of what other women think. We're not all meant to be vying for the same partners in any case, take the MHC for example, not to mention differing interests and life goals.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 09:47 PM
2

Especially the women that aren't exclusively hetero.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 10:31 PM
2

Except that men will not all collectively make that decision of their own volition for the same reasons (and some different reasons) that women don't. It's either everyone agreeing that their needs and desires are best met in a monogamous heterosexual marriage, or some being pushed into marriages against their will. All men/women will never choose that. Whether it's men or women being forced, there will be a large number of people dissatisfied, and married people who didn't want to be married wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 10:31 PM
1

A party lets you meet people who have their guard down because they're probably drinking and surrounded by mainly people they know. It's a good pretext to introduce yourself and an easy place to talk to people you don't know. Your female friends might not be on the same page as you, thinking about your romantic future and all. If they are, and they do set you up, great. But widening your social circle isn't done just for you to rely on someone else to make the first move. You make people's acqua…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/22 05:31 PM
2

Promiscuous men don't either. No one is entitled to a relationship, and women who prefer to keep it in their pants aren't likely to settle for a judgemental man who sleeps with women then ghosts them, has multiple child support payments and VD.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/22 07:39 PM
6

The same outcome can be the result of different motivations depending on context. Option 1, she was drunk and horny, just wanted to get laid. Option 2, the chemistry was there but it became obvious really quickly that you two are not compatible for a relationship. Option 3, you two had sex and it wasn't good for her. Option 4, you started throwing up some red flags, she was horrified and decided to gtfo.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 08:52 PM
6

The only part of it I find concerning is the definition of "not treating you right", if it boils down to "not having sex with you'. Or if a handful of people's behaviour is being attributed to the entire rest of the population. Otherwise, why would you be expected to care about someone who treats you badly, why would you wish them well?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 05:59 PM
1

I strongly prefer bisexual men. Being bisexual (pansexual?) myself, the concept of straightness makes me feel trapped and depressed. It just does not appeal to me in any way. It feels like perceiving the world in a fundamentally different way, and it kind of extends beyond the bedroom. Straight people, in my experience, have a tendency to take certain norms for granted. Which, sure. Alright. They are norms because they are normal, I guess. But I find it impossible to relate when it appears that …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 10:43 PM
1

Maybe some women do, if that's not what they prefer in a guy. I'm super into innocent and submissive guys though, so if I perceive a guy that way, chances are it's not in a wholesome, platonic way.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 09:45 PM
1

If that's what he wants, he's free to say so, but that's not what he did. If having sex with each other was why they did not progress into a relationship, then they were never suited to be together. She is not responsible for their not being in a relationship for the fact of having had sex. If he doesn't want to be in a relationship he isn't obligated to be in one but he is obligated to say so, not string her along, and not be a total prick about it. If you go from good friends to treating someo…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 06:33 AM
5

Not every scenario requires some dude to come along and insert himself to remind us that a woman could also do the shitty thing some man just did. We know. If a guy acts decent and chill with a woman, then sex happens between them and he flips and starts accusing her of things she hasn't done, insulting her and shit talking her, then he's got some issues to sort out and his behaviour is abusive. No pussy is responsible for making a man into an abuser. He needs to get a handle on his temper and i…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 05:01 AM
3

No, you didn't. Sounds more like he showed his true colours and he wasn't quite who you thought. He didn't become a controlling asshole because his penis went into your vagina. He just got too comfortable and let the mask slip.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 12:54 AM
-1

Nah, they aren't, but you can believe whatever you want to believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 04:50 AM
10

Apparently so simple that you miss the point Not everything is centered around you and what you want (both you individually and men collectively.) There's a built-in power imbalance with someone very young and naïve. If you follow every impulse you have without regard for who gets hurt, you're a garbage person and people are judging you for it If an older woman shoots you a dirty look while you're hitting on a teenager, chances are very good she's not mad because she wanted to get with you, but …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 03:04 AM
16

You don't have to go into it with the intention of being predatory in order to take advantage of someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 08:58 PM
1

Sure. Did a little bit of couples play in my early 20s. Might want to try it a couple more times in my life but not certain. It isn't something I'd want to do often and I'm not absolutely certain I'll end up doing it again at all but I'd like the option open. If they were a person who's used to the swinger lifestyle as a routine thing, that wouldn't work for me. Having a few interesting experiences and leaving it open to consideration but not a high priority is about where I stand on the matter.…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/22 04:23 AM
2

Yeah but at least you know that, it doesn't need to be a surprise that's gonna crop up in the middle of a relationship and ruin things after some drunken experimentation.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/22 03:59 AM
3

Depends. If they have a kid, a good co-parenting relationship with the ex and shared custody or visitation, sure. If they have a contentious relationship with the ex, multiple kids, or primary/sole custody, then probably not. I don't mind kids. I even like some of them. I've got one. But I'm not that keen to have any more of my own or anyone else's and I'm not in a good position to raise more even if I felt differently.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/22 03:52 AM
4

She turns 12 this year. She challenges me every day. For sure I'm nervous about the teen years. And my hope is that I can help her be better equipped to handle them than I ever was.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/22 06:54 AM
8

Not claiming you were but not certain what you were saying. I was saying the person you were replying to was saying essentially the opposite of that and that I agreed with it. It's unclear what part of their comment you were disputing when you said "Yep, you're definitely not a parent." I was making the point that I am a parent, yet I also take a similar view to the person with the keyboard smash username.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/22 01:23 AM
6

I'm a parent and I agree with what they said. i would phrase it differently but I read it as encouraging children to pursue their own interests and follow their own path, to think critically rather than just blindly believe everything I say & grow up to become a replica of me. A good parent should raise a child who challenges their ideas, rather than just swallowing whatever they are told. And by extension, a good parent is willing to reevaluate their own parenting techniques and beliefs rather …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/22 01:14 AM
2

Would I stay in the relationship? Not sure. I would have some doubts. But that question would be on the back burner at least until they were stabilized. Would I abandon them? Also no. Still, a life event that major is bound to change a person. Having zero capacity to care for yourself in the most basic of ways will change you. Having to be someone's literal everything would do that too. I would not begin to know how to deal with it. I would expect the romantic side of things to suffer. Now, I kn…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/22 08:58 PM
1

What if she uses her finger? Is that straight then? Do you draw the gay line at the anus, or somewhere in the rectum?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/22 10:30 PM
0

If you honestly believe that manipulation and coercion don't exist, are easily recognized, easily ignored, or fall entirely on the shoulders of those experiencing it, that would suggest you have a very limited understanding of human social behaviours, even for a layperson. There's a reason why duress, necessity, and undue influence are recognized defenses in a court of law. Because they are relevant factors in a person's decision making, and apply to a wide range of situations. Second, who ever …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/22 04:37 AM
-2

Nah, it's not the hypothetical scenario that's the problem. People can ask hypothetical questions as a thought exercise. You can't, however, use imaginary people's behaviour in a made-up scenario to prove a point. Or rather, you're free to try, but I would hope you'd understand why your own take on a situation you made up in your head is guaranteed to confirm your biases and is not terribly useful to any other end.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/22 03:57 AM
0

Yeaaaah, sorry, but if you're using imaginary scenarios to back up your viewpoint, you've already lost the plot.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/22 03:44 AM
-1

So her ex is a creep who is harassing her & her husband with old sex videos to fuck up their marriage, her husband then tries to get her to do the things in the videos with ex, and your takeaway is that she's a lying bitch who doesn't care about pleasing her husband, and he's innocent in all this because he had to see the videos and now feels deprived of anal? How are you not seeing that she was (and IS) being manipulated and abused by this ex? He's making it plain as day how he treats women and…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/22 03:35 AM
15

Does it seriously never once occur to you that women sometimes do things they don't want to because they're pressured or coerced into them? You don't believe women might date shitty men if they think so little of themselves they believe they're evenly matched? It's never crossed your mind that women do things because they are afraid of saying no to a man? Either because that man doesn't take kindly to being told no, or because women are taught that they are morally obligated to perform, to pleas…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/22 03:27 AM
-2

This is not a difference between male vs. female love, this is just you being obsessed with a woman who's not that into you. Or, judging by the "if" and your daydream about magically making her a billionaire at the cost of the relationship, it's you theorizing about an imaginary relationship that never actually happened and is entirely in your head. Using that to back up your view that the wife in question is a bad person for trying anal before she was married, under circumstances unknown, & dec…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/22 02:59 AM
1

From what I can find, both. In overseas adoptions, stated preference leans toward girls, as does availability. The preference persists with domestic adoptions.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 04:38 PM
2

Which interestingly, stands in contrast to adoptive couples (from the U.S.) who tend to show a strong preference for girls.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 08:28 PM
3

Actual pre-birth abortions did and do happen. Do they happen less than they did? Probably. Given that it's now illegal in India to reveal the sex of a fetus other than for necessary medical reasons, there's likely less opportunity to do it before they're born. However, enforcement is somewhat limited and illegal abortions happen everywhere (in this case it's not the abortion that's illegal so much as discovering the fetal sex prior, providing a loophole should the parents manage to do this and n…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 08:20 PM
3

If you were their only partner you are also technically their worst.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/22 06:28 AM
1

No! Keep the dream alive!
/r/MensRights13/08/16 05:26 PM
10

Your last name is Lapine. That's basically lapin, which is totally a French rabbit. That isn't a question. It's just a stupidly cool fact.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 08:36 AM
1

I never said it was criminal, I said that legality does not always equate with morality, and this is one of those cases. In some places consensual oral sex is illegal. That doesn't make it morally reprehensible, nor does cheating on your spouse become morally acceptable, just as long as the dick goes in the standard hole, simply because it's not illegal. Apparently, there are people in this world who can't wrap their heads around that idea.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 11:48 PM
1

*No one who finds that particular law convenient and attractive cares. Law has nothing to do with morality. Law creates an illusion of a level playing field (or is an attempt at creating one with limited success, depending who you ask) while leaving countless grievances against offenders, legislators and enforcers so mired in bureaucracy as to never see the light of day. In your world, the people who get lied to and want their money back or they'll out the liars and the cheaters are the bad guys…
/r/MensRights16/03/15 04:24 AM
1

There's no legal free pass. I would argue that her actions were even at this point morally superior to his own.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 01:33 AM
0

No, lying about being married with a family when explicitly asked by someone you're dating is not the same as not having sex with someone who hoped to have sex with you. If there had been a verbal agreement that dinner was to be exchanged for sex, and the party offering sex recanted after dinner, then the party who initially offered sex would be in the wrong, whether legally enforceable or not. This should be self-evident. To knowingly promise something you cannot or will not deliver is clearly …
/r/MensRights16/03/15 01:32 AM
1

The problem is that you see him as the victim of the situation, and I see him as the primary perpetrator. You are conflating morality with legality. Threatening to reveal the truth about someone else's deceit and betrayal, does not make the person who committed the initial deceitful act into a victim, or an innocent, or deserving of moral support, whatever the methodology may or may not imply about the would-be "whistleblower" here. If she was primarily concerned about his family, she probably w…
/r/MensRights16/03/15 01:10 AM
0

Well, yeah, he does. He owes her the truth. Nothing more, nothing less. If singleness is a prerequisite for going on dates, which for many if not most people, it is (and as she clarified initially, it is for her) then I do indeed claim that he is morally, even if not legally obligated to reimburse her. That's not rape. Tricking someone into going on dates you know they wouldn't otherwise be willing to go on is much closer to rape.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 12:13 AM
-1

He misrepresented what he was offering, she asked to be reimbursed for money spent under a false pretext, and the readership infers that she might otherwise tell his wife about his cheating (quite possible, even probable, maybe justified, maybe not...either way, she didn't go so far as to actually say so). And somehow that is extremely illegal, and therefore this is an outrage because his rights have been violated and she's being opportunistic because she has a vagina and does not take being lie…
/r/MensRights06/03/15 07:41 AM
-1

Most of these things are not done calmly or under circumstances in which they would serve any useful purpose or be justifiable (murder in self defense being an exception). "You pretended to be single and in so doing deceived me (and your wife). Give me back the money I spent on a date that occurred under false pretext, and I won't pursue the matter any further" is not even in the same realm as murder, rape, vote fraud, human trafficking, terrorism, or killing endangered species. Come the fuck on…
/r/MensRights06/03/15 07:28 AM
2

The reason I don't accept your premise is primarily that there is absolutely no precedent for a completely risk-free medical procedure. In a case where both parents cannot agree on a course of action to take in relation to an unplanned (or unilaterally udesired) pregnancy, one parent's wishes must necessarily supersede those of the other parent in order to become the course of action taken. No matter how miniscule the hypothetical risk, the gestating parent whose body is subject to the procedure…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 12:30 AM
2

I absolutely support a man's right to sign away his parental rights and responsibilities, but I would not be accepting of a rule requiring a mother to have an abortion, no matter how low the risk. If that were the law, the father's choice not to keep the baby would then effectively overrule the mother's choice to keep it, and even with the procedure being of low risk to the mother, the risk to the father remains nil in any case. So why then should his desire not to have the child trump both her …
/r/MensRights24/02/15 12:14 AM
1

Fathers and doctors don't have to cooperate in abortions, though. A doctor can refuse to perform an abortion, and there is simply no role available for the father to play in an abortion whether he favours it or not. Someone who contains the fetus from the beginning of its existence cannot decline to become involved. What I meant by the hypothetical unwell child was a child who is unwell for whatever reason, genetics, accidents, chemical exposure whether known or inadvertent, anything...not neces…
/r/MensRights23/02/15 12:31 AM
1

Because not everyone's okay with ending the life of a fetus/child? And requiring someone to cooperate in ending a life when they are morally opposed to such an action is all kinds of messed up? Abortion is allowable because it's the lesser of two evils (the other being coercion of the mother to gestate, or in some cases it's bringing an unwell child into a world of intense suffering). It's not simply a matter of the fetus being a non-issue that may as well not even exist until it's born.
/r/MensRights21/02/15 05:25 AM
24

What if it's two men? THEN are they raping each other? Or two women? Then is no one raping anyone, ever, regardless of consent or lack thereof? If she's going to keep up the sexist BS, she needs to up their game and get creative before she ends up inadvertently saying something homophooobic. Because, you know, that would be politically incorrect and therefore WRONG.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 07:13 AM
1

I don't know why he chose to use that word, but it is in fact a word.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 11:53 PM
1

Supine= lying on one's back. So basically "take it lying down".
/r/MensRights12/02/15 09:52 PM
2

The point is that regardless of whether women or men attempt suicide or commit suicide more, very little attention has been paid to what is happening among the men who do. It's been made into a women's issue when it is no such thing. Which is why it should be considered a gain when someone calls attention to the largely ignored male aspect of the equation. When someone calls attention to the fact that men experience a problem popularly believed to be a "women's issue", it doesn't have to mean th…
/r/MensRights10/02/15 01:45 AM
1

So women attempt suicide more and succeed less often. That could mean that a greater percentage of female suicide attempts were not intended to succeed for whatever reason, or it could mean that women in general are less efficient at killing. Either way, the number of males who die by their own hand poses a problem. How it compares to the issue of female suicide attempts, or even what the implications of each are, is beside the point. The point of the article is that the male side of the equatio…
/r/MensRights09/02/15 02:01 AM
1

I'm not going to downvote you, although I don't agree with what you've said. It's not that I think it's entirely false (men generally are wired to protect women, that much I agree with), just that it cannot possibly be applicable to every member of such a wide demographic. That's roughly 50 percent of the population we're talking about. Not only are some men not interested in leading women or being their rock, but some (many) are not interested in women, and others are not interested in sexual p…
/r/MensRights07/02/15 07:15 AM
2

The author equates peer pressure on men to act impervious to consequences which contributes to mental illness and too often ultimately results in self destructive behaviour (suicide), with peer pressure on women to modify their physical appearance in impossible ways, which contributes to mental illness and too often ultimately results in self destructive behaviour (eating disorders, attempted suicide). She compares like with like, does not include accusatory finger pointing, pandering, or appeal…
/r/MensRights07/02/15 02:39 AM
1

That would depend on where you live and if you can get subsidized rent. Lots of places, no, there's no way in hell.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 12:26 AM
1

IDGAF about the show, but who the fuck takes that attitude regarding their younger sibling and MAINTAINS IT well into adulthood? Narcissistic personality disorder anyone?
/r/MensRights15/01/15 04:22 AM
1

I'm not sure if you're just being pedantic or you truly don't understand. The difference between merit and entitlement is a little like the difference between A) incentivizing donations to a shelter with tax breaks and corporate gift matching because everyone should have a warm place to sleep, and B) a homeless guy putting a gun to your head and saying "Give me your money so I can get a hotel room, or I shoot you in the fucking face" with indemnity. One is strong encouragement with reasonable in…
/r/MensRights03/01/15 03:10 AM
1

I'm not sure if you're just being pedantic or you truly don't understand. The difference between merit and entitlement is a little like the difference between A) incentivizing donations to a shelter with tax breaks and corporate gift matching because everyone should have a warm place to sleep, and B) a homeless guy putting a gun to your head and saying "Give me your money so I can get a hotel room, or I shoot you in the fucking face" with indemnity. One is strong encouragement with reasonable in…
/r/MensRights03/01/15 03:10 AM
1

A person can deserve a raise, a promotion, or a vacation without being entitled to it too. Warranted≠mandatory. A massage, a chocolate bar or a nap is a much smaller ask than any of the above, however. Same with a hot bath, chicken soup and some compassion for a man who has the flu.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 11:56 PM
1

I don't think that anyone is entitled to pampering. I do think that it is warranted in many cases, however. Anyone who trivializes the suffering or hardship of another person and attempts to deny them comfort is doing them an unkindness and is in the wrong. Anyone who realizes that it is better to comfort someone in their suffering is doing them a kindness and is in the right. I believe that there are many people in the wrong at any given time. I am most fortunate and grateful to be acquainted w…
/r/MensRights01/01/15 09:27 PM
1

That's good to hear, here's hoping the laws will also allow for the parent(s) to retain control over the process. Power to the people.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 12:42 AM
1

If you're correct, two of those three outcomes would be horrific. I obviously don't know the women you spend time with, and whether they use pregnancy as an excuse to act like utter sociopaths (which would of course be unreasonable) but the implication that it is immoral and selfish of women to want to be pampered during a difficult process disturbs me. Given that pregnancy is a natural process that resembles an extended period of illness of varying severity in many women, for which most medicat…
/r/MensRights31/12/14 07:20 PM
2

That's pretty incredible, and has the potential to be the greatest and most terrible development in reproductive medicine to date.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 06:46 AM
2

Assuming you could create a viable embryo, who or what besides a woman would gestate it?
/r/MensRights31/12/14 06:00 AM
3

Who hassles someone else to give up their seat when THEY THEMSELVES have a seat to offer, anyway? Fucking who? People just boggle my mind sometimes.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 01:48 AM
1

Wow. This should be shocking, but really, it's just appalling. Are they really just going to leave off with the child and the [not] father never having contact again? Is that what's best for both of them? Or can anything be done about it legally if that isn't what's best? So many needless tears for that family. The crime should be punished, no doubt, certainly by more than a couple weeks in jail and a class on how to have a brain. Still, I feel like damage control should be the ultimate priority…
/r/MensRights02/12/14 12:48 AM
1

I'm not disagreeing with you on that. I was just pointing out the difference between being the worst kind of girlfriend and the kind of person who needs to back off, get some help and delay any sort of romantic involvement, for lack of a better term, rather than continue down the destructive path she's on.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 11:27 PM
1

If it wasn't, then I would say it would be better for him to leave (or her to leave, because it would be the mature thing to do upon realizing her own obvious lack of self-control), and possibly for him to press charges. If it was the first time, then the course of action OP has taken appears to be a reasonable one.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 07:07 AM
3

I'd like to add that he probably needs therapy whether he dumps her or not. Clearly, they both do. When major depressive disorder and domestic violence come into a relationship, no one leaves unscathed.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 10:05 PM
2

Was that bad? Yes. The worst, no. That is the difference between addressing an anger problem the first time it rears its ugly head (meaning holding herself accountable, replacing things she's broken, seeking counselling) and continuing with, trying to justify unjustifiable behaviour, or pass the blame around.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 10:03 PM
1

Insofar as the description given is true, I, and anyone else who reads it, know plenty. You can claim that it's a lie, but as you're not privy to any special information from which the rest of reddit is excluded, all that tells us is that you have your own personal agenda, irrespective of facts.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 01:34 AM
3

As opposed to the point of view wherein it's up to him if he wants to expose a kid to a verbally and physically abusive situation? Get a grip. This has ZERO to do with his gender and his babymama trying to deny him access. It has EVERYTHING to do with his household situation putting him (an adult who can and must make his own decisions, abused and manipulated though he may be...and that's wrong, no question) and a little girl (who has no choice in the matter and needs to be protected from people…
/r/MensRights24/09/14 12:51 AM
4

I don't really find this objectionable for either gender. Hiring attractive servants for a day to bring you drinks, pose at weddings, sing you songs? Who is being put at risk, harmed, coerced, or degraded here? No one, as far as I'm concerned.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 04:53 AM
1

I think it was actually articulated quite well, but outside of its original context, could easily be misconstrued.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 01:54 AM
1

I agree that financial responsibilities ought to fall equally upon both parents as far as is possible. I don't agree that it's a separate issue from reducing child poverty, though, in fact I believe that the two are inextricably tied in with one another. I definitely wouldn't support legislation that had the side effect of increasing child poverty, either, but I don't believe the two goals are mutually exclusive. Given that women are subject to 100% of the medical risks, even in cases where the …
/r/MensRights08/09/14 01:19 AM
1

Although I don't know precisely what single mothers receive in benefits in your country or state, I do know that your government is failing the population overall. If the help they offer to single mothers is actually remotely adequate, let alone excessive, it would be far and away the exception to the rule, which is why I find that essentially impossible to believe. In this instance, note that I am not speaking of single mothers in comparison to single/supporting fathers, or suggesting that they…
/r/MensRights07/09/14 01:46 AM
1

Okay, but I'm not sure what you mean in terms of laws regarding fatherhood not making concessions. Perhaps it would help if you could specify? Consistency across the board gender-wise, as far as proposed changes go, I would support. As for the proposed changes remaining consistent with current laws in terms of minimalism, well, I would have to place overall reform in the interest of more effective policy as a higher priority than consistency.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 05:26 AM
1

No, I do agree that the current laws are unjust and that making changes are a good idea. But what I got from "I see no reason that this topic's proposal be held to higher standards" is: Although failure to account for possible future financial insolvency on the part of men paying support is problematic, and it is critical that we go to the lengths necessary to create new legislation. However, because men have thus far been given the short end of the stick, we should not concern ourselves with th…
/r/MensRights06/09/14 05:17 AM
1

Care to clarify? How are they currently choosing to take responsibility for single mothers again? Assuming we're talking about the US...?
/r/MensRights06/09/14 05:05 AM
1

Ok...so...let me get this straight...because the current law fails men, we must therefore change it so that it's unjust and inadequate for women and children instead? Yeah, let's base public policy on bitterness and resentment! That'll never bite us in the ass.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 09:56 PM
0

Good thing it's not real life then. Like Sons of Anarchy, and Breaking Bad. It falls under the category of "Things that hopefully don't happen in real life that are interesting to watch on television." I'd say most TV dramas do. I agree that it would be outrageous if it was a real life news story, but I hardly think painting this as a men's rights issue will garner much support.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 09:04 PM
1

I agree that a woman shouldn't be having a baby if she knows she's unable to care for it. The thing is, it doesn't always start out that way, and all possible causes of her inability to provide cannot necessarily be anticipated. No one decides "Oh, I'm going to lose my job next year." or "Oh, I'm going to get in a car accident that leaves me unable to work." or "My aunt is going to have a stroke and become totally dependent on me." Now, I'm not saying I think that it should automatically fall to…
/r/MensRights05/09/14 08:56 PM
0

The reason that men don't get to opt out if the woman opts in is simply because, well, if she ends up unable to sufficiently provide for the child, someone still has to. Letting a child go unfed and unsheltered clearly isn't an option (at least some pretense of giving a shit is required for governments and inhabitants of industrialized nations.) And should that become necessary, the government will be left holding the bag. Morality aside, the government doesn't like things that cost them money. …
/r/MensRights05/09/14 08:27 PM
0

Personally, I am uncomfortable with [enforcibly] gender segregated spaces, regardless of which gender is being excluded. Partly because it displaces many individuals who do not fall under one category or the other. Partly because I think that a mentality of otherness is overall non-conducive to equality. I can, however, see how, through some amalgamation of biology and culture, a demand for such spaces exists. I guess the main problem I see with refusing to cut a woman's hair, if she wants it do…
/r/MensRights05/09/14 06:45 PM
2

Cheating is not okay. Feeding someone glass is not okay. This kind of sentencing is pretty normal in Canada, though, and does not always depend on gender. America has all these people behind bars for having a couple joints, and Canada has violent sex offenders living anonymously and freely. I don't like either arrangement.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 12:52 AM
1

That's kind of a blanket statement, and an inaccurate one at that.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 03:14 AM
1

Yeah well you're mistaken. Feminists don't give a fuck about those things. If they do, it's not about feminism, it's personal. Some of us do things on that list too.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 05:24 PM
1

Honestly, while that kind of thing is illegal for obvious reasons and can't be legitimately condoned, people just like the story because it turns a perpetrator into a victim, and the victim into the one with power. Of course it would make more sense if she could have somehow turned around and ROBBED him instead of RAPING him, but the basic point is that he tried to do a bad thing and then he suffered. How I feel about the incident has nothing to do with gender for me personally. It's horribly cr…
/r/MensRights08/09/12 06:44 PM
22

This doesn't sound like a WIN. Not for anyone.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 07:47 PM
2

All I know is that I was going to answer "Yes, I would dodge" to the hypothetical question, although I do not face that possibility personally- being that I am Canadian and we don't have a draft. I'm also female, and would not be eligible even if we did, but there is no shame in dodging a draft. There should not BE a draft.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 11:29 PM
2

I'm a woman who prefers to go it alone. I wonder what differences there are between doing that as a woman and as a man.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 07:42 PM
2

Why would someone not want you to do those things? I'm pretty sure feminism was not intended to be about not doing those things.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 07:39 PM
1

Big news, I'm not just talking about my CURRENT boyfriend's associates. Aside from the fact that we meet people he knows everywhere, everyday, that he hasn't seen in years, or talk to certain people because they can acquire certain things we want and for no other reason...but yeah, anyhoo, good morning Buttinksy.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 01:57 PM
2

Huh, well I'm not sure if that's intended as sarcasm, but it's not my parents who are doing it.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 11:21 PM
3

It's true that there is a tendency to "baby" women and girls while assuming men and boys to be capable of "figuring it out themselves" and neither is very helpful. I'm very independent and prefer to figure things out, but people like to look over my shoulder and tells me what goes where. I haven't been on the other side of the fence but I can imagine it would be difficult in its own right. Anyway, some examples of situations where I've been treated like a child (or a piece of meat, or an idiot) …
/r/MensRights31/07/12 06:08 PM
3

Ah balls, yes, that's the word. I've used "egalitarian" and been met with blank stares. It's a shame really.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 05:49 PM
3

Ummmm no. Not sure where you got that.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 05:48 PM
2

To clarify, I don't walk up and introduce myself as a feminist. I certainly don't wave signs and ask people to check their privilege and become lesbian by default. When asked "aren't you a feminist?" which happens frequently enough, I will say that I am, but in a different way than you might expect, and that I support men's rights with equal fervor.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 06:01 AM
5

Feminism has become a pop culture branding lately...social ignorance 2.0 with a shiny new name. An us-vs-them mentaility means that it will NEVER be a win-win situation. I'm not sure what there is to misunderstand about that. It's sad really. I just don't see any reason to feel threatened regardless, though, because in any domain, there will be dissenting opinions and then of course those who completely miss the point. And it's just that, everything I'm going to encounter here is an opinion that…
/r/MensRights31/07/12 05:58 AM
2

Oh, okay, understood. The Little Rascals were hilarious. Sometimes I wonder how the kids got into acting and whether they truly enjoyed doing it. Of course it was very staged and over the top but you still wanted to believe in the characters :3
/r/MensRights31/07/12 05:49 AM
5

A particular branch of feminism uses that term, which I personally find offensive and misleading. I am not afraid to say so, but neither will I distance myself from feminism as a whole. One word answers are likely to be misunderstood in any case. But like manhater said, modern day feminism (given how recent the movement and terminology have come about I do find that sounds a little silly) to the fragmentation of Christianity into sects (without establishing any particular viewpoint on Christiani…
/r/MensRights31/07/12 05:43 AM
5

While I agree, I have two questions. I'm ignorant as to the meaning of "MGM" and secondly, where'd you get your username? I'm assuming it's tongue-in-cheek?
/r/MensRights31/07/12 05:37 AM
14

I appreciate that you see me (and by implication, those of my gender) as an equal, while maintaining that this is far from a universal perspective. While what you have said is true, feminist misandry and feminism itself are not one and the same. I don't support every action undertaken that is identified with "the feminist movement." For example, the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act is not something I support. The notion that all stereotypically masculine traits are problematic and need to be overcome…
/r/MensRights31/07/12 05:34 AM
9

I guess that would depend on whether I align myself with a particular movement or the strict definition of the word "feminism" itself...the latter is accurate. I understand the difference, but given how many different terms can be applied to a given individual's standpoint, and the lack of a universally understood "language" as it were, the impression is one of nitpicking rather than realizing that a good idea can in fact be misappropriated without the concept itself being tarnished in its very …
/r/MensRights31/07/12 05:17 AM
28

Um, I DO need feminism because as a matter of fact, a lot of people DON'T seem to see me as an equal, and instead treat me like a child or an idiot, or an obnoxious nattering hen where everything I say becomes a joke to them. Yes, the world needs to recognize men's rights as well because, duh, men are discriminated against in many ways, just as women are...so why can't we just admit that both are necessary? This comic just comes off as childish and ignorant.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 04:14 AM
1

Well, of course not. It would feel pretty shitty. No one's saying it's trivial, or inconsequential, or the "right" decision. I'm just saying it's not really a conscious decision and it's not fair to demonize someone for not taking a bullet.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 04:45 AM
2

I always was taught the opposite...that children have more potential, and adults are closer to death, etc. I'm not going to make such an assessment myself, but I am pretty sure I'd take a bullet for my daughter, even if I'm not the greatest mother.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 04:42 AM
-5

Well, as I said, that's sad, but I don't think it's fair to get angry at him for it.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 11:10 PM
9

Well, I don't think it's necessarily anyone's duty to put their life on the line for anyone ever. That implies that we're supposed to believe instinctively that the life of another is always worth more than our own. I don't even think it's necessarily true when children are involved. Such an action would certainly be admirable, but [especially] in a moment of panic that could not have been anticipated, no one should be berated for failing to do so. Although I admit I would find it really sad to …
/r/MensRights27/07/12 06:27 PM
42

I'd honestly feel the same if the reproductive organs were switched...but really, in a split second situation like that, not a lot of thought goes into your actions. It's not fair to judge a person on that. How you react to suddenly being shot at doesn't make you a good or bad person; it just shows what your first instinct is.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 05:58 PM
2

No, I'm not the one who's confused. My point is actually relevant. But "boys and bimbos"? I'm not playing that game today, buddy. Go troll someone else.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 08:39 PM
1

No, it hasn't.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 08:22 PM
2

Because there are other indicators that are more predictive of learning style and affinity for a given subject that far surpass gender, such as aptitude testing. And regardless of our affinity for a particular subject or our learning style, we require pretty much the same skills to get through life. Also, simply because a subject is difficult, does not mean that we will not be required to master it in order to hold down a job or otherwise find success in life. We don't need to gear education jus…
/r/MensRights02/07/12 08:19 PM
6

Dear lord, I hope that was sarcasm.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 08:35 PM
0

Feminists as a whole don't have a problem with MRM, with exception, of course, to the feminists who themselves are not sane (I'm purposely avoiding words that have taken on a negative connotation, in case that was not obvious). In the case of the feminists who are sane and reasonable, there is by and large no problem with the movement itself. There are objections to the rants of the non-sane and most vocal MRAs. I am not, however, convinced that most MRAs are sane; the divide seems to be fairly …
/r/MensRights30/06/12 02:54 AM
31

That's...not feminism. She's just being spoiled and entitled. Her being at home and not having a job would be the sort of thing that would have happened before women's rights were established. Mind you, she'd also most likely have children and a lot of work to do around the house. So, sorry you had a shitty experience with this woman, but don't blame feminism. Blame her being either stupid, a bitch, or both.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 05:45 AM
4

Um, that book looks reeeeeeal classy and all...but honestly, sometimes, men DO have families with women and then decide to disappear, and sometimes asking for child support is appropriate.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 01:19 PM
0

Um, this is terribly sad...I've never minded being looked at that way, always found it flattering...but people don't anymore, not since I stopped being sickly and starved. I don't know if it was that I was so "petite" or that I was jailbait, but I'm 21 and I don't get those looks now, ever. Yeah, I already miss them. Now, the only thing I don't enjoy is when drunk people try to touch me and won't take no for an answer, or when people stare and then roll their eyes, or make a gagging motion...tha…
/r/MensRights10/04/12 12:28 AM
1

The first one wasn't so much a wanted pregnancy, just one I didn't feel good about terminating. He didn't insist on abortion so much as he said he wouldn't have any part in raising a child and he didn't want some random stranger raising his child. He took me the the clinic where I scheduled the termination and was planning to come in with me to the counseling that happens first, but it was downtown and there was NO parking at all. So I went in and went back and forth with the counselor and cried…
/r/MensRights03/12/11 04:14 AM
5

Fuck, that's messed up. I'm sorry that happened to you. I did read and comment on this story last time you posted it, and it still hits hard. There is nothing I can say that truly expresses what I feel for you. I had an abortion I wanted so much not to have, because I promised I would if the pill failed...and it did...and he wouldn't even talk about adoption. He wouldn't talk about the pregnancy at all, in fact, he was so distraught. That was a horrible time for us, and I do feel sad about it in…
/r/MensRights01/12/11 04:30 AM
1

Buy allowing the Custodial parent to save $150 of their own money, in effect you are giving them an extra $150 to spend on anything they want. Yes. That is the idea. Because the custodial parent shouldn't be spending all of their money on the child so that they don't have any for anything else including themselves. The non-custodial parent should be expected to pay a portion of the child related expenses so that the custodial parent's income is not entirely eaten up by the child's needs. If the …
/r/MensRights06/08/11 03:34 AM
1

If $100 of the child support payment is spent on food for the child, then that is $100 of the Custodial Parent's own money they can spend on anything they like, say booze. All the money goes into the same bucket. Firstly, it is possible to regulate how the money is spent to some degree, such as with the use of a food-stamp type system only not of course just for food, or even a special debit card, which will log purchases and only allow items relevant to a child's needs. Secondly, freeing up som…
/r/MensRights05/08/11 09:21 PM
0

Hahaha...ha. You're not an MRA. You're not even a man. You're a deadbeat, a troll, or both, so take your riled up, bitter, whiny ass to circlejerk, or someplace where they don't give a shit about rationality or civility or anything that requires more than four letters to spell...like fark.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 03:04 AM
1

There's a difference between visitation rights and custody, and a huge difference between being unable to support a child and being able but unwilling. I believe the child does deserve the opportunity to know his/her father, but a father who could, but simply doesn't want to help support the kid absolutely does not deserve to have a relationship with the child, and would not be a good influence on the child in any case.
/r/MensRights04/08/11 10:50 PM
1

I never said that equal custody usually is granted. I said it should be. That is what needs to be fixed in the system. That I would consider a good change. I don't think removing child support is a good solution, I think it's missing the point. There absolutely should be restrictions on how the money is spent, and fathers should have the opportunity for equal custody once the child is weaned. But when custody is awarded to one parent because the other is unfit or uninterested, the unfit or unint…
/r/MensRights04/08/11 10:45 PM
1

Wow. Just wow. This is about Germany. Germany. Germany is in Europe. This has nothing to do with the U.S. The U.S. is not in Europe. Did you read the article? The one that said the parent with custody will not receive any child support money and therefore will be caring for and paying for the child alone? Yeah, that one. Did I say anything about how I feel regarding imprisonment for non payment, or how much the non custodial parent should be paying? Pretty sure I didn't. I did say that half of a…
/r/MensRights04/08/11 10:37 PM
1

Half of the paycheck is not a reasonable amount to expect in child support, that is one of the flaws in the system (or in the abuse of the system). But neither does a father who will not contribute financially to the child's upbringing, (provided he is able, of course) deserve an opportunity to be a part of his child's life. I can understand not wanting to give any money to the child's abusive bitch of a mother, but the problem in the scenario is not money, it is that she got custody of the chil…
/r/MensRights04/08/11 07:03 AM
0

This is awful. Both parents should be contributing to the child's upbringing. Custody should be shared, and in cases where that is impossible, such as if one parent is abusive, neglectful, or no longer wants any part of raising the child, said parent should still be required to contribute financially. Frankly, I don't much care which partner has the penis and which has the vagina, but this ruling is absolute bullshit. A general no to spousal support, with exceptions for cases such as one partner…
/r/MensRights04/08/11 06:57 AM
0

How do you know it wasn't his sperm that were the problem? Or that the failed marriage isn't largely attributable to his behaviour? You don't, and you don't need to. Don't make this about something it's not. She is not entitled to his money and it is wrong of her to take it, and that is what this is about. It is not about age or fertility. Being all bitter and denigrating her sexually is immature and reflects poorly on you as a person, and to outsiders, MRAs as a whole.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 09:54 PM
1

Well, I think it is too young. Just because people have done it before doesn't mean it's a good idea to do it. It's a little like people who insist that we never used to need modern medicine, vaccines, this or that in our diets, and arguing that people lived just fine or better without these things in the "natural world" just fine for a long-ass time before...but they didn't. I mean, life expectancy was much shorter, people died of infections we could now cure easily, and many, many children did…
/r/MensRights24/07/11 05:34 AM
1

No, but they might be faster and more likely to survive injuries. It's not like angry dogs are the sole reason I don't think four year olds should go out without an adult, either.
/r/MensRights24/07/11 12:38 AM
1

I didn't, I got behind a tall fence.
/r/MensRights22/07/11 08:57 PM
1

I'm 21, and I walked to school in first grade as well. I had some very close calls, though. A large dog chasing me, a guy following me, detailing how he was going to chop me into pieces and run those pieces over, a van following me. There's imaginary danger, and there's very real danger, and I would prefer to be a little too strict (not WAY too strict) than a little too lax...because a sheltered child that experiences things a few years later than they would have liked to is better than a dead o…
/r/MensRights22/07/11 07:37 AM
-2

In the yard, yeah. Again, it depends where, and just how young they ar,e as well as their intelligence. That varies from kid to kid. But I can understand not wanting a 4 year old and a seven year old to go places outside of the yard unsupervised. It's reasonable for a couple 7 year olds to walk down to a 7-11 or a playground together. It's not reasonable to let a 4 year old go with them.
/r/MensRights22/07/11 07:27 AM
-1

7 or 8 year olds can maybe walk a block or two, in pairs or groups, in a good neighbourhood. I wouldn't trust a 7 year old to watch a younger child, though. "Getting out" is not the only or the worst thing that could happen to a young child. I don't think it's reasonable to expect a 7 year old to do that either. After a certain point kids do need some freedom, but safety comes first and this is, to me, beyond reasonable limits.
/r/MensRights22/07/11 06:38 AM
0

Um, spying on her ex would be weird, but covertly watching the kids because she's worried would be legit. A four year old should not be playing outside unsupervised, anywhere. A seven year old maybe, in the yard with other children. I wouldn't trust someone to care for my daughter if they were pulling something like that. Spying might not be the answer, but who honestly thinks what this ex is doing (failing to do) is okay? Oh, wait, she met you ONCE and she's asking you this? Either she's psycho…
/r/MensRights22/07/11 06:13 AM
0

It's not surprising, nor is it unjustified for her to feel that way. She carried that baby inside her body for almost a year. I think she is more entitled to custody than her ex. Not exclusive custody, not anything close to that. Children deserve their fathers, and fathers deserve to and should play a very large and significant role in their children's lives. But the fact is that pregnancy is (or can be, for women who choose to experience it), both a great joy like none other and a painful cross…
/r/MensRights15/07/11 07:51 AM
-2

I'm not saying she should get away with it, but it is extremely funny nonetheless. I would feel the same if the original perp in question were female, and the shop owner male.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 09:49 PM
3

My dad's married to my mom, but he was the stay at home parent for most of my childhood. He was, and is, the most awesome dad ever.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 07:55 AM
2

You're wrong about all women wanting kids. There are plenty women who aren't sure and may decide that they do, but there are also women who are very sure they don't and have to fight tooth and nail to get their tubes tied because so many doctors only do tubal ligations on women with x number of kids or past a certain age.
/r/MensRights31/05/11 08:10 PM
1

I have to disagree that honor is a gendered concept at all. Honor is the value we place on integrity. Integrity is scarce, and sorely needed, in an increasingly flaky, disjointed, and egocentric populace.
/r/MensRights31/05/11 08:00 PM
9

I went through an abortion I realized I did not want once I actually got pregnant, because that's what we had agreed we'd do. He was so concerned about not getting attached to the baby, he would not stand for any mention of it. He would start breathing heavily, growl, and leave the room if I said anything about being pregnant. Feeling alone and knowing I would grieve the loss, I told him I would like to consider giving it up for adoption. He told me if I gave birth to the baby, he would commit s…
/r/MensRights31/05/11 07:22 PM
5

How can anybody be mad about such a cute little spermie cake? He has GOGGLES for fuck's sake!
/r/MensRights11/02/11 08:24 AM
2

It's very nice that she does those things for you. It's NOT nice, though, that you think you're somehow responsible for it or deserve credit for it. Either she's doing it because she cares about you and enjoys making you happy (hopefully you reciprocate), or else you've made her fear for her safety if she doesn't do these things, and that's cruel and genuinely abusive behaviour. If you've found a woman who treats you well and cares about you, treat her like the gem she is, don't talk down to her…
/r/MensRights10/02/11 04:24 AM
2

It was the other way around with my boyfriend...his dad insisted on circumcision and fought for it against doctors' recommendations and paid a retarded amount to have it done to his son. Boyfriend is not pleased one bit about it, and it makes me seriously sick that children can legally be violated like that.
/r/MensRights03/02/11 09:04 AM
1

Both the male and the female frenulum are sensitive to erotic stimulation. I can verify this by sticking my hand down my pants. Or I could open a textbook, but being a red blooded woman whose frenulum is sensitive to erotic stimulation, I prefer the former. Also, a portion of the he clitoral shaft is removed in the circumcision process. The crura remain, which I know are GREAT, I've experienced having them, but 1) they are not the same size as the penis and 2) female circumcision is akin to chop…
/r/MensRights06/01/11 04:16 AM
1

both the penile and clitoral shafts contain erectile tissue, both have a frenulum, and both end in a very sensitive head (glans). In female circumcision, they use a sharp object to cut AROUND the clitoris, and take all or most of it out (this includes the shaft). It does not simply involve removal of the glans, nor is the glans inconsequential.
/r/MensRights06/01/11 12:34 AM
1

Precisely my point.
/r/MensRights05/01/11 04:46 AM
1

The glans penis is analogous to the glans clitoris.
/r/MensRights05/01/11 04:46 AM
3

Even so, both are violent and abusive practices. Specifying gender only implies that one type is acceptable and the other is not.
/r/MensRights03/01/11 05:35 AM
6

I'd like to know why they specify "female circumcision" as cultural violence. Not that it isn't, but why not just "circumcision"? Yeah, I know I'm reiterating what we already know, but it continues to boggle my mind.
/r/MensRights03/01/11 04:17 AM
2

I'm a woman who is very much FOR men's rights (or true gender equality if you prefer). But I'm not so much a modern, independent, self-sufficient woman. I know I could never get by without my man. I appreciate what he does for me and I know that he deserves the same respect and right to stand up for his interests as I do.
/r/MensRights01/12/10 11:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter