TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

privatetroll Archive

View 0 posts and 27 comments by privatetroll on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
28

The satire still makes more sense than the article it is based on. If you read the article, she basically assumes that woman can not logic because she can not. This is a reactionary, sexist piece of shit. Instead of attacking the satire, feminist should strive to purge their ranks from such retards. Oh and her language is totally fucked up. Trying hard to sound knowledgeable and "well educated". Sadly that is typical for those circle though. (Yes there are other logic systems to discover such as…
/r/MensRights15/12/13 05:48 PM
-29

Please delete your post. Privacy is important.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 09:53 PM
-2

There are downvote-free subreddits. This is just a simple setting and might be worth considering for this subreddit as well.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 09:45 PM
1

Do you really care about the feelings of your friend? If so, you don’t sound tactful. Have you thought about how telling him what a poor rape victim he his can hurt him emotionally? It is probably the best for him to just let matters slide. Everything else will just hurt him more emotionally. Of course the other issue is the two woman having done wrong. Letting them get away with it might not be right. It don’t know you, nor your friend, nor the two woman, so I cant really give any advice on wha…
/r/MensRights08/07/13 09:35 PM
0

Both women and men bring valuable, subtly different skill sets to both the work place and family life. Why deny family or work access to one of these skill sets? Care to provide proof for the work place one? What sets of skill are woman able to do that are biological impossible to do for man? Don't start with shit like they are more emotional, that is no plus point but an silly excuse for bad traits. Everyone should have the possibility to work but currently labor is too cheap. We have too much …
/r/MensRights24/06/13 10:46 PM
4

Hostile: 3.45 Benevolent: 0.18 The test is quite useful for finding what he calls benevolent sexism. The hostile sexism part is garbage. Having a bad opinion about some or even the majority of people of one sex does not equal being prejudiced about them. For this to have any value, there should be, questions about man as well. So if one is critical about the behavior of one gender and not the other, one can more reasonably conclude some sexism. (Though even then I am doubtful of the scientific v…
/r/MensRights23/06/13 09:45 PM
1

They probably downvote me for my other posts in this thread, which are quite controversial. The theory of male disposablility is totally spot on and could be beautifully applied in this thread. That is exactly the discussion that should happen here. It is kind of sad that this subreddit provides beautiful insights, partly insights that are light-years ahead to most progressive feminism (yeah feminists you can actually learn from it and improve you own theory) but the majority of users here are r…
/r/MensRights19/06/13 10:15 PM
-1

What crime do you see in this video? Rape, NO, not even attempted. Yeah maybe sexual harassment. Is he going to fill a case against here? Was it even real or just some play? We don’t know. If you have been intoxicated and if so how much is quite relevant on deciding the punishment but I agree with you: Being drunk is no excuse for bad behavior. Maybe it is an American thing to believe you can solve every problem with jail-time. It is an horrible problem solving scheme. The police should be the l…
/r/MensRights19/06/13 09:34 PM
-4

Yes but again what is your point?
/r/MensRights19/06/13 05:00 PM
-7

It probably was. Of course every person reacts differently but I don’t believe it will cause any long-lasting trauma. Most serious abuse cases happen by close family not by some random drunk girl on the train that he has no emotional connection to and he will probably never met again, anyway.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 04:45 PM
-3

I agree with 4 (that boys can be traumatized as well) but what is your point? Have I stated otherwise?
/r/MensRights19/06/13 04:34 PM
-12

What is your point? If you want to to point out gender differences, you should point out that bystanders are more likely to help a girl in this situation than a boy, as the boy is believed to being able to defend himself alone. The whole "girls need protection" thing.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 03:01 PM
-15

I don’t agree that the woman should be in jail. Most people have done things when drunk that they are not proud of. Not an excuse for bad behavior but putting everyone in jail is surely not the solution. I still upvoted you, as I think you don’t deserve the downvotes. The point about feminists actually taking male rape victims seriously is reasonable and contributes to the discussion.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 02:29 PM
-40

Rape is a serious crime. Please only use this word in an appropriate context. This is a case of harassment by a drunk person. No harm done and the boy now has some crazy story to tell. (Of course this is not good behavior in any way and harassment in trains is a serious problem but not a gender problem. Man do it too and get away with it in most cases.)
/r/MensRights19/06/13 01:42 PM
0

Yeah it is quite easy to point out why one would need full legalization for both sides. This is why I believe that any serious attempt to improve the situation of sex workers will in the end result in full legalization.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 10:37 PM
-6

It is not. I mean sure she is definitely full of shit BUT from an pragmatic point of view it makes sense to first improve the situation of the sex workers before the one of the customers. That way you can still get the votes of people thinking that prostitution is being immoral while improving the situation of sex worker (of both gender). Sexist are the comments here that assume only woman are sex worker. (Yes the article does too but start keeping attention to the actual content not wording.)
/r/MensRights16/06/13 09:37 PM
3

That is because the "Johns" are seen as being in the superior position, having the money and the power while the sex worker are forced to sell their body to earn a living. At least that is the best I can come up with but not really convincing. (Is the welfare in Canada that bad?) Sure the proposed law has definitely flaws but thinking pragmatic it makes sense so support this. This will massively improve the situation of sex worker (of both gender if you haven’t realized it yet). Sure prostitutio…
/r/MensRights16/06/13 09:22 PM
1

She had no sex with kids but with an 16-year old. How the fuck can she be an pedophile? Go to Wikipedia and look the word up.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 12:33 PM
-4

Nobody should have to go to jail for something minor like that. Oh and wow, 10 millions, for what? (Though revoking teaching license is probably right, as she was being unprofessional.) If you think that this is a MR issue, you are fucking retarded. Yes, no gender should get jail time for this. Yes, being a woman might help. You should focus on helping man that face unfair treatment and not on being a jealous crybaby.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 10:20 PM
0

No is not an appropriate response. You don’t know the people and there can always be misunderstandings. It is not your job to judge their private life. Everyone who uploads pictures of an other person without their consent in an clear intent on harming them, deserves to get sued and punished.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 11:47 AM
-6

People should acknowledge human rights. I guess most tend to do. About specific issues regarding the male population: Man can fight for themselves. We make half the population! Stop whining!
/r/MensRights03/06/13 12:31 AM
-4

The ad is retarded. Everyone is going to agree that one should teach ones children to respect woman/people. So what? Even more silly is the "correction". That is is just trying to be overly politically correct. You want to fight feminism with political correctness? That's adorable! You know these people play the game way longer than you.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 08:02 PM
0

I think that its a mistake to copy feminism and use rape as platform. Exactly! We shouldn’t make the same mistakes as feminism. I really don’t get why they downvote you. Some people seem to be unable to appreciate valid criticism.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 08:27 PM
0

I say it is trivial because it is trivial. What do you expect people to gain from this message? "Oh I didn’t know that woman can rape, omg you totally changed my view?". Bullshit, everyone knows. Just like everyone knowing the definition of rape can conclude that you should not do this. If you want to hear more critic: What the fuck has rape to do with gender equality? When a man rapes a other man it is because some man are more equal than others? Rape has a variety of causes and can happen in a…
/r/MensRights01/06/13 08:14 PM
-1

It's supposed to show that any gender can rape any gender, though it could be labeled a bit better, in my opinion. This is trivial. No need to say this. It makes as much sense as a feminist shouting "Don't rape!". What i guess it wants to transport is that rape with man as the victim often gets overlooked. In this case it should try to transport this. No beating around the bush.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 03:33 PM
-2

Sorry I don’t understand this. What is it supposed to tell me? Is this some kind of satire? "Sex is always Rape"?
/r/MensRights01/06/13 12:43 PM
4

This video may be inappropriate for some users. WTF?
/r/MensRights31/05/13 12:25 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter