TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

pro_male_revolver Archive

View 2 posts and 34 comments by pro_male_revolver on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

This theory has been debunked so many times it is practically the wage gap. This doesn't belong in men's rights Term male disposability is detrimental to fighting for male rights. Male disposability implies biological reductionism ,,men are disposable, women are not. Period" - something nothing can be done about, a law of the world set in stone. Male hostility means society is ACTIVELY HOSTILE towards men. Its an ACTION and therefore if we get successful in fighting for male rights it can be sto…
/r/MensRights18/04/22 03:50 AM
4

You are dishonest, women are more welcome in male dominated work forces than men, while men are harassed in female dominated work force until they quit. Women don't get shamed for being promiscouous by men, only by other women. Also small minority of men who have a lot of sex are shamed by women, and large majority of men who get no sex are also shamed by both women and men. Not to mention women have no problem with shaming men they are attracted too publicly while men are ready to KILL other me…
/r/MensRights03/04/22 10:32 PM
2

You know calling people retards without any arguments to support it will not make you excluded from being one yourself... Frankly quite the opposite.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 12:33 AM
2

For them ,,real man" is disrespected doormat that just take it.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 12:32 AM
4

He is most likely a pro male man, don't knof if he is an mra.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 03:21 AM
5

They care more about keeping women happy than not going bankrupt. Women know this.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 03:20 AM
5

Yes they want to look for a group that sound more like a men group instead of women group to blame for it even if it doesnt exist (SJW are fictional unlike feminists). They pretty much scapegoat women doing on men EVERY SINGLE TIME.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 03:19 AM
3

Ok so did you changed your discord policy or do you still favour feminists, pro mgm hateful people over mra men? Because so far your policy is menarehuman but feministsarebetterhigherhuman.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 03:57 AM
0

You are wrong. Men succesfull with women enable their bad behaviour and attack other men. What you said is praising male on male competition and validating it because its for the sake of pandering to women. If you see rat race agsinst other men in which the winner get prize of providing benefits to women then you might be part of the problem. If I misjudged you then its good - I hope that is the case. Again MOST OF SELECTED, ACTIVE SEXUALLY MEN ARE WHITE KNIGHTS TOO.
/r/AntiFeminists27/11/21 02:30 AM
1

You are right in your description. I agree with you that male enablers are a problem too. But dont call them simps, simp mean a man who is pandering to women incorrectly implying he stop being bad once he panders correctly and get laid. That is not the case here. Men who get laid can still be horrible white knights.
/r/AntiFeminists27/11/21 02:28 AM
3

Right wingers will do unjust law practises to pander to women.
/r/AntiFeminists16/11/21 05:26 PM
11

Society and especially female part go OUT OF THEIR WAY to berage, curb stomp, shame, blame, paint as monsters and beat down underperforming men. Or even men who performed well in the past but now underperforms. On another hand if female underperforms everyone helps her or explain it with lack of training, bad day, improper environment, not being looked after enough and generally gives her positive reimforcements. People assume best things about women and worse about men.
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/21 02:44 AM
4

Exactly, simp term means putting hyperagency onto men.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 11:02 PM
6

Simp means a man who panders to women incorrectly. If you are blamimg a man for not reading female mind and being rejected in general you are anti male. I feel bad for those men, but will not shame them for it, if I shame men for something its attacking other men. No one calls women simps, distinguish between reality and ,,definitions worship"
/r/MensRights19/10/21 11:49 AM
2

You are the one claiming video is wong, not me. I stand behind evidence from the video. You stand behind nonexistent evidence and claims pulled out of your arse, troll.
/r/AntiFeminists24/09/21 08:08 AM
2

So you offer no argument, troll. You would be a good cult leader, but me ain't joining.
/r/AntiFeminists22/09/21 12:52 AM
3

You provide no argument, you just make a statement and that is supposed to be a truth because you say so. Ofc everyone except you misunderstoods things because of reasons you take out of your ass and never care to share them (because then the truth about them being bs would be uncovered). You are confident, sure - you are also a troll.
/r/AntiFeminists22/09/21 12:51 AM
3

He blames other men for everything and puts hyperagency onto them. He wishes he is alpha and hates ,,beta" men because they are just like him. While alpha don't exist outside his and all redpillers imaginations.
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 02:28 AM
1

So men are either real men - alphas or loser betas who are at fault for misandry. But women are not to blame. This is their nature, they had no choice! Tell me again, what are you doing in antifeminists subreddit? You are spewing biological reductionism.
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 02:26 AM
2

Also women do not value good male body. Every woman, even extremely ugly can get 10/10 man in her bed on tap, one hour using tinder.
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 02:25 AM
2

Well I can debunk what you just said by pure logic. If betas are those who get killed and do not reproduce while alpha kills betas and reproduce then in about 100-200 years there WILL BE NO BETAS AT ALL. As the do not pass their genes and die either killed by alphas or naturally. Or maybe logic means nothing to you? Maybe you just spew DEFAULT pseudo science anti-male bubble of RedPill/PUA circles that really plays well into your brain because its convenient explanation that scapegoats female ev…
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 02:23 AM
4

No they shall not be used. Why do you think shaming men for lack of successful pandering is good for man. ​ If there is something that society would rage against if done to women, then you can be 100% sure its misandry to do it to men.
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 02:13 AM
1

Then bestow us with a real science, troll. Oh you can't? I forgot, everything repeated by you over and over again is science.
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 02:11 AM
0

Listen, we are not criticizing you attempting Pragmatism - that is actually quite keen. Problem is - you imply that feminism was justified and valid in the past which was totally not the case. Feminism from the beginning was a hate group which decided that privileged class (women) shall destroy second class citizens/slave class (men). Nothing more to it. Also your idea about how beta/omega etc. mean men who are pandering to feminists despite enabling their own doom is false. Most men pander to f…
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 02:09 AM
2

Ok you keep repeating that. Video proves that wolf packs studies were wrong. If you repeat the same comment 1000 times it will still be debunked. Also leaders of animals pack are not bullies beating other males and fucking all females in the pack. By its own definition alpha genes biological reductionism is a lie to divide men. If it was true then in 100 years of evolution no other genes that alpha would exist. Everyone would be a ,,genetical alpha"
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 01:50 AM
1

You see, despite fact of how you flash your self proclaimed intelligent superiority (you might be more intelligent that I am - frankly speaking many people are. That is normal and I am aware of that) I do not only go by what you claim but also what you do. And what you do even in your previous comment is greatly defending ,,misogyny" and you talk about it way more than you talk about misandry. This ,,maybe" misandry is more spread across society than misogyny is a smug attempt to take away argum…
/r/MensRights09/08/21 09:37 PM
2

It's not a strawman - in the screenshot attached to post you are actualling defending term misogyny. It does not matter what term means to you, or to me or what dictionary says. For most people and social media misogyny means pathological extreme hate of women. And by defending this term while assigning your own meaning to it you unintentionally enable it (but not your meaning - any meaning people assign to it - that is why we should avoid using this word, because you are protecting something el…
/r/MensRights06/08/21 05:32 PM
2

You validate smearing men as misogynists, which later results is society enabling feminists misandry campaigns. There are different ways to do mens rights but all you are doing is helping feminism/misandry.
/r/MensRights03/08/21 09:16 AM
3

Right wingers say they are against feminism, while in reality they would help, enable and pander to a feminist because she is a woman. And women are a higher caste to right wingers. There are many examples of political leaders saying women are more important than men, including former president of Biggest power in the world (MuRica) and Janusz Korwin Mikke from far right party in Poland. Right wingers are pro destroying other men in order to get money and then spend this money for a woman to giv…
/r/MensRights30/07/21 10:45 AM
5

Its gender sentencing gap... But tradcons like that gap, until they are the one sentenced.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 10:29 PM
5

There are also meny lost young men here. They might listen to his advice and end up zapped.
/r/MensRights18/06/21 07:22 PM
0

If she is so awesome and love you so much why did she demanded you marry her? Just please don't lie that it was your idea. Admit you were zapped and don't recommend it to other men. Did you also sponsored her for Visa?
/r/MensRights18/06/21 07:16 PM
4

He is even wrong about the porn itself. There is more femdom porn than maledom so in essence - men are more degraded on screen. So even TECHNICALLY according to facts astw101 is lying. Industry of porn is also catering to feminism - for example many porn sites like pornhub took down videos after feminist with help of tradcon attack dogs attacked them. Astw101 is here to gaslight men, if its allowed to gaslight men in men rights space then it only show how much disadvantage men have in general.
/r/MensRights18/06/21 02:05 PM
4

You are straight face lying. There is waaaaay more femdom porn than maledom and maledom is waay more toned down. So TECHNICALLY degrading is the case - men are more degraded in porn. You are indeed a feminist ally, disregard facts, gaslight men. Also women are paid more in porn, but its not important to you as you came with a goal in mind and will cherry pick whatever makes it easier for you to spread lies. This is male rights space, not male gaslighting bootcamp.
/r/MensRights18/06/21 02:03 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter