TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

professorXhadadream Archive

View 0 posts and 45 comments by professorXhadadream on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
18

Must be miserable living in a world where getting approached by creeps holds the same mental weight as dying earlier than half of the population on this planet.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 03:29 PM
1

Nah bro. Men are giving each other body dismorphia. Women are quite content with dad bods & the physiques above.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 01:09 AM
1

…and spend half as much time with their children/creating family culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 04:23 AM
8

Not having sex with you before marriage would be evidence of that change, no?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 04:08 AM
2

Men are as loyal as their options. If he’s attractive and his partner is not, he’s likely deficient in any one of the many areas women value men in besides looks, ie. he’s a bum and she’s supporting him.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 04:01 AM
-2

Facts.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 03:59 AM
14

Generally agree, you don’t need to be a dick about your preferences, they are what they are. But where are women being treated like garbage, en masse, for being promiscuous today in Western society? If this was pre-birth control/1950s era, I’d wholeheartedly agree with that statement. But today, there’s no public shame in promiscuity. OnlyFans could not exist if the sentiment towards women’s sexuality never changed in the past 50 years. Are there some men who aren’t happy with the changes? Sure.…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/22 09:27 PM
17

Statistically, lower body count positively correlates with longer, happier marriages for both parties. I’m not advocating for chastity, I enjoy the current state of consequence-free sex too, but current statistics would seem to support the argument of lower body count being better for long-term marriages. Also, I don’t think it’s fair to claim what you believe someone else’s preferences are when they are directly telling what they are, which in this case is just a lower body count. Maybe not as …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/22 08:39 PM
-8

I’m quite sure complimenting men’s appearances will slow down their libido. /s
/r/seduction29/09/21 05:37 PM
2

The majority of men are not abusers, about 20-25% of women (1 out of 4) report having been in an abusive relationship. Clearly, the majority of women have good judgement. Teaching that remaining 25% to focus on self-improvement first and not how to judge men better is likely to result in similar relationship pattern going forward. Red pill praxeology, by definition, are the behaviors that work to achieve a positive result with the opposite gender, ie. dread game would not be a thing if it was wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 06:22 PM
2

A lot of women end up in bad relationships. If they de-center men, they might actual leave a bad relationship. I’d argue the majority of women in bad relationships end up there because they are not good at judging men’s character. Self-improvement alone won’t address that issue. It isn't though, most women do not respond well to 'red pill' tactics long term. What “red pill” tactics do women not respond to?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 05:41 PM
1

Interesting. Clearly there is a problem here, however your argument removes autonomy for black women (people, really) and blames the problem solely on the behavior of black men. How could the out-of-wedlock birth rate possibly be black men’s sole responsibility when birth control for women has been publicly available since 1965 and abortion clinics are widely available in low-income areas? Do you understand what you are implying about the millions of women who are impregnated by these men every …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 05:25 PM
3

Do you believe 70% of black children today are being born in circumstances where women are being pressured to “tolerate the most awful behavior” from black men? Because 70% of black children are being born out-of-wedlock today, and you are arguing this is due to “the disgusting way that black men treat them”. Or is there more nuance…? Whether you believe that is the case or not, ALL women are accountable for whom they allow between their legs (excluding force).
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 07:11 AM
1

No one is challenging whether you are an attractive, likable person. I’m sure you are great at making friends. The point is whether a “de-centered focus on men” is the “best dating strategy for women”. Red pill praxeology (for men) heavily focuses self-improvement, however the things men are encouraged to improve in themselves are things women find attractive. That is partly why RP is an effective dating strategy for men. By not focusing on the target, you inadvertently shrink your pool of poten…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 05:59 AM
1

Only true if men of interest value the same things in you that you value in yourself. It is not a given that your ideal man values the same things in you that you value in yourself (without their consideration). Do you not see you are dictating both: - the terms which men are valued to you - the terms you SHOULD be valued to men Nowhere do you leave room for men to dictate their own terms for women, and the “higher-value” the man, the more likely he is to have ego-centric terms like your own (ie…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 02:34 AM
1

Everyone is lying to each other in the dating market. It’s all fake-it-till-you-make-it, whether it’s game or make-up. Regret doesn’t count as sexual assault.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 12:27 AM
1

Can you call this an effective dating strategy if you are not at all focused on your target (ie. men)? How do you know your strategy will net positive results (ie. your ideal man) if your focus is what YOU want for yourself and NOT what your ideal man wants from you? Self-improvement and dating are correlated, but not the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 12:17 AM
1

Here’s the thing; almost every woman is going to answer reflexively “no” to this situation because it’s obvious. But the situation you present is not a definite scenario, but a probabilistic one which women are already placing their bets and assuming the risk. Women avoid dangerous places if they feel unsafe; bars and clubs would be men only establishments already if they truly felt the risks outweighed the benefits.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/21 01:40 AM
2

"Well it's not the same, you got raped by another man, and it's men who are causing this problem, so it's just men attacking other men" So if it were women raping men, it would be… equal?? Yes, men are the victims of violent crime too (in fact, more often then women), but clearly there’s no worse fate to suffer than being raped as a woman /s. 🏃🏃🏃 💨
/r/MensRights21/09/21 01:29 AM
1

😒…This is intellectual masturbation and I don’t see how this or OPs thought experiment sharpens our knowledge of BP ideology / RP praxeology.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/21 01:54 AM
1

Fuck no. This sounds like a horror film. Even monks live more interesting lives than this.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/21 07:27 PM
2

I read the wiki, didn’t see anything relevant to links in comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/21 06:52 PM
1

My point, if you recall, is this means less sexual access for the most amount of men. Whereas 60 years ago, these women would have happily matched up with average men, today none of these women will settle for average. That’s less sex for most guys, but more sex for a fortunate few.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/21 06:32 AM
1

That's a problem for Becky and her family. Cuz no sensible man is committing to that. It really isn’t. Dysfunctional men are stuck in mom’s basement playing video games. Dysfunctional women are pushed into the dating market to become some poor simps burden. (Also, your statement about women having less sex and lower sexual desire today is HIGHLY debatable.)
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/21 06:28 AM
3

Low standards for whom? If those are HIS only two requirements, then each requirement weighs 50% of his total standard. That makes each standard pretty “high” and important in my opinion. I’m sure you have many more standards (quantity), but just because someone has fewer, doesn’t make their standards less valuable TO THEM (quality). At least he told you the truth; a lot of men will PRETEND to value you for all the things YOU want them to value you for, all the while thinking exactly like the me…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/21 12:10 AM
1

Holy shit bro 😳 I didn’t even see her earlier post until you commented. I don’t even know what to say. “No value male” is probably it though.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 11:56 PM
5

Context He’s coping with RP rage. Dude is having sex with a girl he finds hot/attractive yet can’t help but complain about other shitty women he IS NOT having sex with, immediately after having sex. My guess is he’s either a hidden tradcon or a droughtcell.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 11:14 PM
2

I’m 36 and I receive compliments all the time on my skin. Never once have I been asked about my “skincare”. Being healthy, hydrated and not fat is like 90% of the way there for most guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 11:03 PM
7

Yes, the “with you” part is sometimes silent, but he was vocal about the “right now” part. The only way you’ll know which is more pertinent is to just go for it and not play any head games.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 10:47 PM
1

I’m sure you can Google it. 😊
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 08:38 PM
1

Oh but I did. Source Since you have time today, I’m sure you can do your fancy maths to reach the comparison needed to prove your point.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 08:17 PM
1

Again, who decided to use 2018 as the basis for comparison? Not me. I bet if you were being intellectually honest with my argument and compared 1970 to today or the 2030 projection, you’d get my point. But alas, we have time to be pedantic on the internet today.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 08:01 PM
1

Because however incorrect YOU may have thought it was, the actual correction was irrelevant to the actual point, pedant. Nothing to be embarrassed about when you haven’t been proven wrong. This is the equivalent of wanting credit for fixing spelling errors in an open source AI machine learning software codebase. I mean sure, you made a correction, but honestly, no one gives a shit because the code works the same before and after. But go on and give yourself a pat on the back.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 07:53 PM
1

ME: “More and more women are choosing to be single and childless. Here’s some stats.” YOU: “Not ALL women. Here’s some fancy maths to make my point.” ME: “ Irrelevant point. Women are still CHOOSING to be single and childless. Even your data shows that.” YOU: “But look at how it breaks down among these groups of working age women though.” ME: 🤦🏾‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 07:51 PM
1

I’ve already updated my earlier reply to use the term “working women”, so this whole argument thread you’ve put together is effectively moot. But please, go on, I do find this amusing.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 07:41 PM
1

All that math and you still missed the point. Again, stop being pedantic. By 2030, 45% of working women aged 25 to 44 in the United States will be single. There’s nothing to debate here and you haven’t shown a single receipt for your “60% of ‘working age women’ are ‘working women’” claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 07:38 PM
1

Bruh. Now you’re just trying to make an argument about the TERMS “working women” vs “working age women”. Did you actually check my receipts? The links cited reference 45% single. Stop it. Get some help.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 07:21 PM
1

How exactly does any of what you said change my argument? Is your argument a LOWER percentage of “working women” will be single compared to “working age women” by 2030? To reiterate my point, a significant population of women will be single by 2030, whether you take that out of the “working age women” or the “working women” segment. I never brought up 2018; my point, which you are attempting to derail, is the significant increase in women who are CHOOSING to be childless and single. If a signifi…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 07:12 PM
1

Stop being pedantic. 50% vs 45% isn’t that much of an exaggeration. Explain the difference between “working age women” and “working women” and WHY that difference is important here? Comparing 2018-2030 misses the point; let’s chat about the delta from 1970.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 06:49 PM
1

Again, some sex vs. none. What “should be” has no place in this discussion. 25% of women 20-50 are unmarried and childless today, compared to 10% in 1970, and 45% of all working women will be single by 2030. It appears women are choosing to be alone. 1, 2 Hot guys DATE hot girls. Hot guys will have sex with almost any girl 5/10+ if shes DTF. The truth is Becky fucked a single Chad in her early 20s, and subsequently thinks that she deserves a long-term relationship with one. In the 21st century w…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 06:33 PM
3

Some sex is better than no sex. Just because something is a meme does not make it a falsehood. In fact, memes tend to identify ideas/behaviors that are already present within culture. Yup, $50k/yr is good money, but are YOU going to settle for an $50k/yr ogre, if you already make that or more? Becky will get at least a few rich/hot guys in her 20s, and will be resentful at the thought of settling for a $50k/yr ogre in her late 20s/early 30s, especially if she’s making that or more. Nothing bizar…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 07:47 AM
12

We’re in a decline from the most amount of sexual access for the most men. It’s not necessarily a tradcon thing, but tradcon relationships/marriages largely benefit men in terms of sexual access. Men want sex, and in the past, were able to offer provisioning and security in exchange. Today, many women can handle their own, so men who ONLY have that to offer (ie. physically unattractive, but economically attractive) are being left out more and more. However, the current dating market does benefit…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 01:08 AM
5

I think we’re talking past each other, I never said being a traditional husband was a doormat, quite the opposite. Also, what era are you referring to when you think of “traditional husband” roles? Can we agree on a time period for references, I don’t know, after the civil rights movement? Beta bucks, by definition, are men who provide the things (ie. money, time, security) that women require to feel comfortable and secure in a long-term relationship. Beta bucks are called “doormats” because the…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 12:30 AM
20

“Beta Bucks”: treats women well, takes women out on dates, buys flowers, brings gifts, ie. provide money/resources Besides being a plow horse/doormat, how is that not the same as traditional husband roles?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/21 07:29 PM
1

Let me rephrase that for you: Women control the entire relationship realm, physically and economically unattractive men have no say in anything. Men, generally speaking, are not the ones looking for a relationship. Women are. Given women only find a small portion of men both physically and economically attractive, those men (of a certain class/status/value) are in high-demand and therefore have the leverage. Nothing new here, just becoming self-aware.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/21 01:29 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter