prudencepete Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
8	The comic and caption aren’t necessarily gendered so why are some of the comments? Especially considering that the guy is doing most, if not all, of the work	/r/EverydayMisandry	31/05/26 01:06 PM
4	The comic and caption aren’t necessarily gendered so why are some of the comments? I had the same thought about framing aftercare as a need. I’m willing to grant that aftercare can be more important for the woman for the first handful of times you two have sex, but ultimately, it’s just a preference on her part. But if it’s just a preference, why should her preference take precedence over my preference to go to sleep or scroll on the phone? Framing aftercare as a need is a subtly manipulative way of forcing compliance with her wishes instead of addressing the root problem: why…	/r/EverydayMisandry	31/05/26 01:03 PM
10	They’re trying to erase history to fit their narrative. I’m really curious what rights she’s referring to	/r/EverydayMisandry	22/04/26 10:21 PM
9	No The probability of committing a crime given the fact that you’re male ≠ the probability of being male given the fact that you’ve committed a crime	/r/EverydayMisandry	14/04/26 09:48 PM
16	Comments on a Rare Positive Post About Short Men Agreed, but the original comment was just disingenuous. When roughly 80% of North American men are taller than 5’7 and roughly 80% of women are shorter than 5’7, how does it make sense to say “insecure” men are the reason why most women don’t end up with men who are shorter than they are? It’s classic blame shifting. For example, height is normally distributed, and in North America, the average height for a woman is around 5’4. So even at 5’6, Tom Holland is taller than at least 50% of women. Ye…	/r/EverydayMisandry	12/04/26 11:01 AM
12	What’s wrong with a woman dating an older man if it’s an appropriate age gap? Asserting something to be true doesn’t make it so. If you believe what you said, support your argument. Agency is a crucial part of any moral argument here. If a person in their late teens/early 20s cannot make a decision about who they choose to date, what else shouldn’t they be allowed to do? It makes no sense to treat adults like children in this scenario. No one is forcing younger people to be with older people. I already told you I’ve been married for over 10 years to a woman who’s older th…	/r/EverydayMisandry	10/04/26 03:39 PM
21	What’s wrong with a woman dating an older man if it’s an appropriate age gap? How do you know the motivations behind why a certain person dates younger? Why does your premise assume that the younger person has no agency? I agree that specifically targeting younger people is often a red flag. However, youth and beauty are strongly correlated. Going for someone who’s attractive doesn’t automatically make you a predator.	/r/EverydayMisandry	10/04/26 03:21 PM
24	What’s wrong with a woman dating an older man if it’s an appropriate age gap? Other people are not obligated to act in line with your beliefs. I agree that I couldn’t see myself going for a major age gap with someone younger than me, but with that being said, my wife and I met when I was 21 and she was 27, and we’ve been together for over 10 years now. Age rarely comes up for us. Calling something gross and predatory because you personally wouldn’t do it is just childish.	/r/EverydayMisandry	10/04/26 03:03 PM
40	What’s wrong with a woman dating an older man if it’s an appropriate age gap? Nothing. As long as there’s consent between adults, there is no inappropriate age gap.	/r/EverydayMisandry	09/04/26 11:25 PM
12	men create their own problems bs again Exactly. So many of us have been conditioned to believe we are no longer beholden to nature/our environment. But how else do you explain that similar systems have been found across virtually all human civilizations for all of recorded history? Furthermore, how do you explain that gender relations did not significantly change until the Industrial Revolution? The presentism is strong with these people.	/r/EverydayMisandry	04/04/26 07:50 PM
3	I don't know why people don't draw more feminists-racists comparisons given how COMMON gender essentialism is among feminists, like here's just one example People really struggle to understand conditional probability.	/r/EverydayMisandry	13/02/26 07:37 PM
1	The Twitter OOP is the one concerned about the reputation of men rather than the victim - ie prioritising promoting collective guilt. I’m a Black American, so I understand your point completely and would agree that applying generalizations to the individual often leads to bigotry. My point was that, in the case of this twitter thread, you can’t look at one rare incident and make a generalization about a whole group based off of it - especially not when that group encompasses 1 out of every 2 people on the planet.	/r/EverydayMisandry	04/12/25 01:46 PM
1	The Twitter OOP is the one concerned about the reputation of men rather than the victim - ie prioritising promoting collective guilt. I don’t think the problem here is generalizing. Generalizing is fine when actually grounded in meaningful data and sound inference - this is a huge part of the field of statistics. That was not the case with the Twitter OOP however	/r/EverydayMisandry	25/11/25 10:48 PM
2	Uneducated hot takes from an obvious ragebaiter I was hoping someone would've called out that claim. While it is true that the Y chromosome is substantially shorter than the X chromosome, it's completely false that that's all the genetic material that a father contributes. Each human being has 46 chromosomes, 23 from mom and 23 from dad. It's Biology 101.	/r/EverydayMisandry	13/11/25 04:00 PM
2	Not All Men Who Say Female Are Misogynists Always sounded weird to me, but it’s mostly a dialect thing. In plenty of urban areas in North America, that’s just another way of saying “women”. Then that slang spreads to other parts of the Anglophone world. Understandable with it’s off-putting, but mostly harmless	/r/EverydayMisandry	27/08/25 03:00 PM
9	Someone who obviously doesn't understand biology making a hot take I’m curious about their definition of a relationship if they’re claiming it’s something more than friendship + sex. That definition already covers a lot of territory	/r/EverydayMisandry	12/08/25 10:18 PM
7	Guy takes photograph on busy public transport, Karen decides he's photographing a woman and kicks off... I should risk getting into a fight because a dude is taking pictures of a crowded train? Wild. It’s easy for her to dismiss the threat of violence because she’s not the one who would have to address it.	/r/EverydayMisandry	17/07/25 03:43 PM
18	Expecting Misandry of and Celebrating Misandry in Gay Men What gets me the most is the idea that it’s primarily one gender hurting the other in relationships. Because we all know that women are never horrible in relationships….right?	/r/EverydayMisandry	08/07/25 05:18 PM
14	I suspect this is somebody under the age of 30 writing this. This is probably a satirical post. It’s a parody of how some men describe the change in a woman’s sexual market value over time.	/r/EverydayMisandry	06/05/25 02:24 AM
1	Wife Insists on Packing Her Husband’s Lunches While on Maternity Leave and Packs Him a Diaper with No Food for Calling a Coworker’s Lunch Pretty I agree 100%, but that’s not where she is right now. While she’s working towards being more self assured, this is an effective way for her to healthily express her emotions.	/r/EverydayMisandry	30/04/25 03:17 PM
8	Wife Insists on Packing Her Husband’s Lunches While on Maternity Leave and Packs Him a Diaper with No Food for Calling a Coworker’s Lunch Pretty Couldn’t agree more. This could’ve been a late night conversation between the two of them. Her: “Hey honey, I know you didn’t mean to hurt my feelings when you talked about your coworker’s lunch, but I just worry that I have so many things to do and I can’t do anything right. I’m trying to be everything to everyone and I feel like I’m failing.” Him: “Babe, I’m so sorry. I never meant to make you feel like that. Your lunches are great and I appreciate everything you do for me and our family.” The…	/r/EverydayMisandry	28/04/25 07:52 PM
6	Todays episode of What dehumanising thing men are being compared to: Dogs Because 1) women get nothing out of marriage, and 2) men are soooo happy in their marriages. lol. These people cannot see a situation from anyone else’s point of view	/r/EverydayMisandry	18/04/25 10:05 PM
1	Women don't understand what it means to be a functional adult Absolutely. All the benefits of equality but none of the downsides	/r/EverydayMisandry	24/03/25 07:35 PM
5	Women don't understand what it means to be a functional adult It’s very frustrating. I don’t think we should view doing household chores as a measure of maturity. We should think of it as a preference (because it is), just like anything else. Some people value cleaning more than others.	/r/EverydayMisandry	24/03/25 06:58 PM
8	Infant Circumcision and the Draft Exist By “no equivalent”, I meant that legal paternal surrender doesn’t exist for men in North America, but abortion is still legal in many places across the continent. I definitely agree with your bodily autonomy examples. I just think the bodily autonomy argument bypasses the core issue in the abortion argument. It axiomatically accepts that fetal life is no different than the mother’s life and proceeds to argue for bodily autonomy, when pro-lifers are arguing that fetal life is absolutely different…	/r/EverydayMisandry	21/03/25 03:51 PM
48	Infant Circumcision and the Draft Exist 1) Men don’t get paid more simply because they’re men. 2) the abortion debate is actually rooted in the question of whether an embryo/fetus is deserving of the right to life. Furthermore, there is no equivalent of abortion for men. 3) Men are never assaulted at night? Men are never attacked by strangers? Men are impervious to bullets and knife blades? These people live in a fantasy world. They can’t see past their own ideology.	/r/EverydayMisandry	21/03/25 03:34 PM
1	I’m participating in a public speaking competition soon. I need advices on the most prevalent topics in the men’s rights community to talk about. The only one I can think of is androcide and lack of protection for men. Are there any other recommendations? Male reproductive rights (paternity fraud; legal paternal surrender; lack of viable, non permanent, long term BC options)	/r/EverydayMisandry	19/03/25 10:48 AM
1	Father takes care of the lions share of domestic duties and misandrinists still invent fictional stories to blame him for his shitty marriage As someone who’s currently experiencing a version of this story, it instantly spins me up to see the types of responses these post normally garner. It can be hard to understand if you’ve never lived through it, but this story isn’t uncommon AT ALL. And often, it’s not a problem you can simply #communicate your way out of. This is something that wears on you day after day, year after year, and there’s barely the lightest shred of sympathy, even from other men. It’s a very lonely existence	/r/EverydayMisandry	18/03/25 02:00 PM
9	Fuck this shit,tiktok is full of hateful man haters. Let’s suppose that 15% of men were violent criminals and that 90% of violent criminals were men (the 90% stat is close to reality, the 15% is an overestimate). It would still be true that 1) not all men are violent criminals, and 2) the overwhelming majority of men are not violent criminals. Smoking kills is still a valid statement because smoking is one of the leading risk factors for disease and medical complications. That statement exists for much more than simply the link between tobacco and…	/r/EverydayMisandry	18/03/25 12:36 PM
1	Feminist don’t have empathy I’m not disagreeing with you - thanks for sending the links though.	/r/EverydayMisandry	05/03/25 10:02 PM
12	Feminist don’t have empathy I need to read these reports, but this tracks with so much of what I’ve seen. There’s also the fact that, speaking in generalities, men and women engage in different crimes in different proportions. Is it any wonder the sex with more testosterone and greater average muscle mass is overwhelmingly more likely to engage in violent crime? Whereas female criminals are more likely to engage in theft and fraud. Men are more likely to inflict harm via overt measures, while women are more likely to do so…	/r/EverydayMisandry	05/03/25 02:56 PM
3	Why is it everywhere on this site It’s really getting to that point. I used to love this site for its diversity of viewpoints, but over the years, Reddit and basically every other major site has become an echo chamber for the same old tired talking points. It makes me want to disconnect from everything	/r/EverydayMisandry	02/03/25 07:19 PM
40	Now Apply This to Minority Groups Who is defending them? We’re saying don’t conflate the categories of men and criminals	/r/EverydayMisandry	28/02/25 03:56 PM
2	GF considers breaking up with bf if he doesn't do as she demands and vote for who she orders him to vote for I’d love to know if she believes that Trump is dumb, even though he was the president for four years…	/r/EverydayMisandry	28/02/25 01:07 PM
5	Double standards in the comments The idea they have that most men are cheaters and that most women are ride or dies. lol	/r/EverydayMisandry	24/02/25 03:57 PM
13	Insane Generalization https://youtu.be/ioSI3KsE2_k?si=juZ9C6-W4qeSJ3Vg	/r/EverydayMisandry	05/02/25 05:47 PM
6	This sentence in a manual for a synthesizer Truth, and there’s plenty of research to support your observations	/r/EverydayMisandry	02/02/25 11:40 AM
1	Gender neutral draft/conscription or complete abolition? I agree with you there, and I say this as a veteran. However, I’m not a combat veteran so it’s hard for me to speak on women in infantry roles.	/r/EverydayMisandry	23/01/25 02:50 PM
3	Gender neutral draft/conscription or complete abolition? I definitely hear where you’re coming from, and I don’t have a strong opinion one way or the other. I wanted to pick your brain on this one. Because ultimately, I don’t want there to be a draft at all, but it’s hard for me to justify that idea. And I want the draft to be gender neutral exactly for the reasons you’ve stated, but it’s hard for me to justify that one too.	/r/EverydayMisandry	22/01/25 10:40 PM
0	Gender neutral draft/conscription or complete abolition? I agree that women are just as capable at using firearms as men. I see nothing wrong with women voluntarily serving in combat roles. A draft is a different animal, though. Before we make arguments for why the draft should be gender neutral, you’d first have to explain to me why a national invasion justifies conscription. If the goal is national survival, how does it make sense to send the half of the population that carries the next generation in equal proportion to the half that doesn’t? Conscr…	/r/EverydayMisandry	22/01/25 10:17 PM
1	Gender neutral draft/conscription or complete abolition? Your question cuts to the heart of my comment - there are biological differences between men and women that cannot be engineered out of our society. Women carry children and nurse them in their infancy. If the survival of a society is the goal, women serve a more crucial function than men when it comes to creating and nurturing the next generation. This has been proven time and time again throughout history. This is the idea of male disposability. Warren Farrell has written plenty on the subject…	/r/EverydayMisandry	22/01/25 09:36 PM
2	Gender neutral draft/conscription or complete abolition? This subject is more complex than we often acknowledge it to be. How do we separate the idea of the draft from nationalism in its general sense? And if there is a nation worth defending, does it make sense to send the mothers and would -be mothers of the next generation to the meat grinder?	/r/EverydayMisandry	22/01/25 09:17 PM
2	People openly defending hatred against men and demonize them on reddit Truth, but I’d say the same thing in that scenario. The second premise (“all false accusers are women”) doesn’t readily render any generalizations about women as a whole.	/r/EverydayMisandry	20/01/25 08:29 PM
9	People openly defending hatred against men and demonize them on reddit “Not all men but it’s always a man”… I always wonder what they think they’re doing when they say this. It’s a misunderstanding of conditional probability, it seems. There’s a huge difference between the probability that someone is a criminal given that they’re a man vs. the probability that someone is a man given that they’re a criminal. But these concepts are routinely conflated with one another.	/r/EverydayMisandry	20/01/25 12:14 AM
5	Quite funny how brothers weren’t included in the list isn’t it? Exactly lol	/r/EverydayMisandry	17/01/25 09:52 PM
8	Quite funny how brothers weren’t included in the list isn’t it? Yup, because no man has ever been assaulted by another man (or woman, for that matter) walking home late at night	/r/EverydayMisandry	17/01/25 08:48 PM
10	Quite funny how brothers weren’t included in the list isn’t it? Crazy to think it’s almost been ten years since that happened, but I absolutely agree. It’s the classic argument that men are bad by default and women are good by default. So the bikers who saved that woman were “exceptions to the rule”. Because not all men but most men are abusers, didn’t you know? You can’t reason with these people.	/r/EverydayMisandry	17/01/25 08:47 PM
10	More paradoxes/duality with the approaching women topic. The category of abusers and criminals is constantly conflated with men in general, and it makes no sense. They don’t consider that when men are victims of violence (and they are, in equal proportion to women), they are almost always victimized by other men. Yet still, we don’t default to the idea that any random man would mug, rob, and/or kill us. Additionally, they won’t acknowledge that men and women hurt the opposite sex in different ways. Men default to physical violence for obvious reasons,…	/r/EverydayMisandry	16/01/25 04:23 PM
5	"Misogyny makes men are lonely and there are no pro-life women". Exactly. I’ve also never understood the argument that men as a group are anti abortion. How would that benefit the average guy who accidentally knocks up his gf/wife?	/r/EverydayMisandry	15/01/25 05:23 PM
84	I don't even bother attempting to find a date for a reason They spent so much time thinking about what was possible, they didn’t take the time to consider what was probable	/r/EverydayMisandry	15/01/25 05:21 PM
3	On a post asking “What did you grow up believing that ended up being a complete lie?” In addition to what everyone has already said, it’s the sex negativity that really sends me. As if the only way for a guy to care about you is if he shows no sexual interest in you whatsoever. As if sexual interest and genuine care are fundamentally incompatible. The real problem happens when women who think like this get into relationships and marriages. Now their husband/bf is a deviant because he wants to have sex on a regular basis, whatever that means for the couple. This mentality sets wom…	/r/EverydayMisandry	03/01/25 06:39 PM
27	Singlehood is "deserved" if you dont pay for coffee I’d also love for these people to acknowledge that this is one of the main reasons men give up on dating. There is little to no reciprocity	/r/EverydayMisandry	31/12/24 05:15 PM
7	Transactional actions for men =misogynistic. And transactional actions = valid Every relationship (arguably aside from the parent-child relationship) is transactional to a certain extent. This is definitely true of romantic relationships. The woman in this scenario wouldn’t stay in a relationship if she wasn’t getting what she wanted out of it. I don’t see any reason why he should. In situations like this, it’s NOT often the case that the man is treating her well simply because he wants sex. Firstly, ideally the woman wants to have sex with him too. But secondly, the sex i…	/r/EverydayMisandry	28/10/24 11:24 PM