~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Women at Google were so upset over memo citing biological differences that they skipped work, ironically confirming the stereotype by getting super-emotional and calling in sick over a man saying something they didn't like. 🤦🤦 🤷¯\_(ツ)_/¯🤷I just told you in my previous comment what is scientifically untrue. Did you even read the memo or are you a bot? Also that is still a fallacy, as the biology degree has no relevance to the subject at hand - again: did you read my comment? Not gonna repeat myself, just reread what I wrote carefully. | /r/MensRights | 09/08/17 06:50 PM |
| -3 | Women at Google were so upset over memo citing biological differences that they skipped work, ironically confirming the stereotype by getting super-emotional and calling in sick over a man saying something they didn't like. 🤦🤦 🤷¯\_(ツ)_/¯🤷All I'm telling you is that having a PhD (which again - he does not) does not make his opinion more valid. Especially not in Biology, all you are doing is appealing to authority. It might be relevant if it was psychology - but you can clearly tell that the author cherry-picked his "facts" to paint a narrative that does not exist, or at the very least exaggerate a narrative. One example would be his "empathizing vs systemizing" theory - a hugely criticized theory, only ever done with children and… | /r/MensRights | 09/08/17 06:33 PM |
| – | Women at Google were so upset over memo citing biological differences that they skipped work, ironically confirming the stereotype by getting super-emotional and calling in sick over a man saying something they didn't like. 🤦🤦 🤷¯\_(ツ)_/¯🤷No you clown. Having a phd (which btw he does not have) does not mean your opinion is magically true. Some top scientist from MIT believes smoking has no relation to lung cancer. Is that now true aswell? Christ use your head. | /r/MensRights | 09/08/17 04:10 PM |
| 1 | Another Perspective on the Wage GapYou offer to explain and all you do is being a condescending cunt again. Wow. Props to you. What a salty life you gotta lead. Its hard to follow implied meaning with zero context in a third language, but honestly after googling around im pretty sure youre just throwing words around. Demographic overlap has no meaning in this context. Enjoy being a cunt in the future too, you are sure being a valuable part of society. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 13/04/17 04:41 PM |
| 6 | Another Perspective on the Wage GapFirst: What kind of demographic overlap and how does that relate to men being forced into paying child support? Second: I'm not "having difficulty following" anything, I'm asking you what your point is. Can't exactly mind-read what you "thinking about". Third: Maybe your conversation would be a little more productive if you were less condescending. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 13/04/17 09:31 AM |
| 9 | Another Perspective on the Wage GapSo do some of yours with you. Whats your point? | /r/PussyPassDenied | 13/04/17 07:32 AM |
| 11 | Another Perspective on the Wage GapWhy not? Absolutely fair, as long as men aren't forced to carry the burden of that choice. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 13/04/17 06:23 AM |
| 14 | Another Perspective on the Wage GapBecause it doesnt take two to carry, birth and raise a child last time I checked. Also women, when given the choice will prefer kids/family to work compared to men. The reality is that childless single women in their 20s outearn men. http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2014/apr/09/genevieve-wood/what-pay-gap-young-women-out-earn-men-cities-gop-p/ | /r/PussyPassDenied | 13/04/17 06:22 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter