TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

puddlejumper Archive

View 1 posts and 60 comments by puddlejumper on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Ask Red Pillpuddlejumper/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 02:16 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

That is simply not true, it's hormonal you tard. Let's meet a girl who wants sex 30 times a day. Are you going to be up for it? If you don't want sex 30 times everyday of your life, does this mean you're not attracted to her? People have different sex drives. Men have different sex drives to each other even. Some want it 5 times a day, some want it once, some even only want it every few days.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/13 12:52 AM
2

Ahaha this post has the worst advice. You don't tease them or tell them to stop. That may get you Alpha status, but it won't get you the girl. But since Alpha's seem not to care if they have the girl or not, then win win. If you can't care about someone enough to support them, then don't get close enough to them for them to start wanting it.
/r/TheRedPill10/06/13 07:16 AM
17

It's got nothing to do with you, or how attractive you are to her. Sex drives are an individual thing. Once a day is actually a fairly high sex drive. You just have a higher one. Neither is at fault.
/r/TheRedPill10/06/13 06:57 AM
1

Well this article, as per the title, is directed at Narcissists and women. it's a an article for women to read. All the comments and the quotes you highlighted are actually universal for both male and female narcissists, so just swap the genders around if you want. It's not blaming "men" it's blaming narcissists. This article just happens to be directed at only one of the genders.
/r/TheRedPill10/06/13 05:52 AM
-3

This isn't gender specific. This is just simple emotional manipulation. You can use it on anyone who isn't aware that it is happening.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/13 10:19 PM
1

Most men wouldn't agree with you though. TRP is a small subsection of men who feel a similar way about women and life. You can claim that every other man in the world is ignorant and only you guys know the real truth. But the truth is you guys are the minority. This is not a coincidence. Claim repression and society and the oppressive women all you like, but most men do not agree. And guess what, they are all just as intelligent and introspective as you guys. I'm not invalidating your thoughts a…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 11:44 PM
1

Yeah I would agree that I am not completely over him. I did spend over 2 years loving him with everything I had. I am not ashamed to admit how invested I was in what I thought would be a forever relationship. But the him I know, is not the him he actually is. So I am attempting to integrate the person I have memories of, with the person I now know him to be.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 11:39 PM
1

Nuh uh. Shock != wrong. Uncommon, yes. Wrong, no. I probably do paint a one-dimensional picture of my ex. But one thing I have learned after a lot of research is that he only seems to have 3 interests. Picking up women, video games, and cars. His career is maybe a 4th. If there is something cool to do while picking up women, well that's a bonus, but his motivation is women. Everyday he dedicates hours to maintaining a steady contact with as many women as he can. I can't be bothered going into de…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 11:35 PM
1

I'm not saying there aren't shitty people out there. There are, in both sexes. And even nice people can unknowingly walk all over someone. The difference is you are now more aware of behaviour and interactions with women and can now make better judgements about it. That doesn't mean women should now be your stomping ground.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 11:25 PM
0

It feels like women grow up in worlds where we are taught men > women, and you grew up being taught the opposite. From my perspective of a female, females just want to find loving relationships. They don't care so much about the status or money of the guy, as long as the emotional reciprocated care is there. That trumps all. But men treat us like objects, and pretend to like us more than they do to be able to have sex with us. Then they don't talk to you anymore. Both sexes get cheated on, and u…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 02:16 PM
1

I don't agree on emotional security being manifested in alpha behaviours. Alpha behaviours work to attract women, but are not good for maintaining relationships. Emotional security comes from a person listening and showing genuine care and empathy. From showing affection and for the care and attentiveness to be consistent and ongoing. A girl with genuine reciprocated love in the relationship will never choose an Alpha over what they already have.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 02:08 PM
2

I say don't look either. But if a unicorn turns up on your doorstep, at least try and pat it first.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 01:38 PM
0

You are the first to talk with a certain degree of respect for women. An appreciation for them as people rather than undeserving objects to use for sex. Are you of the idea that you can not have a rewarding monogamous relationship with a woman, or that your life will never be more fulfilled then by having sex with as many different women as possible?
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 01:36 PM
1

I don't disagree on that. There are traits that men and woman find differently attractive. I would agree that men hone in on looks. But you miss the point of what makes the man attractive for a woman. One thing a woman looks for is security. Financial/physical and emotional. Yes it involves money, but only to the extent that the money provides security. An emotional security trumps financial one, which is why you can game a woman into bed. For example if Barry the Builder makes the woman feel mo…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 01:32 PM
0

I didn't contest that women can access emotions better than men. It was more about whether we are more anecdotal. I would suggest that seeing women always choosing better men at the expense of their current men is anecdotal too. You see it because you're primed too. Celebrities comes to mind as examples. And I see good looking, rich, women marrying men who are not always so. You don't seem to see or believe that men have rewarding emotional relationships with women. That neither party is there b…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 01:23 PM
0

You clearly haven't met a woman that you have a had a proper rewarding relationship with. That isn't to say that men can't have satisfying relationships with them. Sounds like you've already made up your mind. Also sounds like you are ruling out experiences before they can even happen.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 01:15 PM
1

It sounds like you have never had a positive rewarding relationship with a woman. Just because you haven't, doesn't mean others don't.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 12:43 PM
1

Hang on, so most marriages the men are the sole bread winner, but more marriages are at risk of ending when the partners both contribute? Yet the rate of divorce is about 50%? Sounds like there's a lot of correlation implying causation here. I would hazard a guess that the only reason there are more male bread winners in the world is both because of religious marriages, where divorce is undesirable on religious grounds, and a dying out amount of older generations. Hypergamy would suggest all the…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 12:39 PM
1

We're generalising about the dynamics of every relationship/marriage. So apparently every guy is the sole bread winner. Yes sound like an accurate generalisation.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 12:25 PM
-1

Pushy = pussy I will assume. Does it really sound relaxing to you? To me it sounds like he has a goal in mind, and that he is going to be rather disappointed if he doesn't get it. Rather than just being able to enjoy the vacation for the vacations sake.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 12:23 PM
0

Actually I asked my boss. His response was that it's bullshit. That you guys all got butt hurt at one stage in your life and are looking for some fulfilment now that going from girl to girl only fills temporarily. He says the looking at other women never goes away, but the desire to be with them is trumped by the desire to be with the one he loves and who loves him back. Who has his back in times of need and who cares deeply for him.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 12:18 PM
2

While written well. It offers nothing but it's own words as evidence. Are women more anecdotal than men? I'm not sure. No one has more knowledge than what they themselves have experienced/read. If the troll? woman in the car had a better knowledge of maths, she would have answered it correctly, as I did. Is it suggesting that women fall back on what they have experienced when they don't know the answer? I don't see any evidence suggesting men don't. And I certainly don't see any evidence that th…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 12:14 PM
2

I agree you are probably a really good guy. But I have to question how deep it runs. My ex is a really good guy too. He is generous and friendly, attentive, reliable, and will go out of his way to help you. But he is capable of betraying trusts behind women's backs. To me that shows a lack of respect for women. It smacks of the person who is incredibly nice to all their friends, but is rude to servers and strangers. They are only nice to the people when it serves a purpose for them.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 11:39 AM
2

That's interesting. The theory here is that having sex with a lot of different women is a biological imperative. However having sex serves absolutely no evolutionary purpose these days. Either the biological urge to have children doesn't exist at all for men, or it should be present consistently. It makes no sense biologically and from an evolutionary standpoint to get an urge to have children later in life for a short period of time. Perhaps then I would reconsider what really is driving you. I…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 11:35 AM
2

So then you never actually feel a biological urge to have children?
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 11:27 AM
0

I think it depends on what you think is bettering yourself. Yes you miss out on having sex with more women by not continuing after triple digits was hit. But then you miss out on other experiences that having sex with different women all the time can't give you. Yes you can hit 600lbs, and then 700lbs and then 1000lbs, and then you can continue that until you die. Good for you, but no one is going to be laying on their death bed thinking about the thousands of hours you spent in the gym lifting …
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 11:01 AM
1

There is a difference in the urge to have sex, and the urge to have children. Although they both have sex in common. Are you saying you do have a consistent urge to have children with these women, and that you just restrain it because of modern day consequences?
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 10:57 AM
1

Actually your biological imperative is to reproduce as much as possible. Does you desire to have children with each of the women you sleep with match your desire to have sex with them? If not, then I would rethink exactly what actually it is that is driving you to plough through women.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 09:39 AM
1

First off, it was completely his "fault" that I did not see his attempts to hook up with other women. It wasn't something that was happening under my nose and I chose not to notice. It was well hidden. He was in contact with me every single day, all day, for years. His location was available for me to see whenever he responded on facebook. I am not entirely sure how successful he was at actually cheating on me, only that I now know he tried a lot. He was very open and honest about things, and ga…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 09:35 AM
1

Ah, from everyone else's response, being beta is not living as a true man. It's living a repressed life against your subconscious wishes and biology.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 09:16 AM
-1

That wasn't a shaming at all. It expressed my shock at the effort. The guy is flying to another country for a week to be with a girl who he has no real intention of seeing again after it, unless he needs to get laid later on in life.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 09:14 AM
0

I'm curious how this proves your definition of female sexual strategy?
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 09:12 AM
0

Sure, maybe I was never good enough for him. He never mentioned it. He also never gave it a chance. There was no point in the relationship where he tried to be monogamous. And under your theory, there is never a chance. Because all men want varied tail all the time. But I am willing to be told I was at fault. None of you are. I can internalise my failures.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 09:09 AM
-1

It was honest for him. But look to the wider world. There are many more guys who love having sex with the same person. It's not just sex anymore, it's a shared intimacy that they find more rewarding than "new cunt".
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 09:03 AM
0

Yes I would. A relationship isn't just about what I want. It's what both of us want and we find a compromise. It's a genuine partnership. If being with only me made him unhappy, I wouldn't want to force him into a life like that. Just as he wouldn't want to force me into a relationship I didn't want.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 09:02 AM
1

To be honest, I stopped talking to all men who did not give me an 100% friend vibe while I was in a relationship. I don't want to be friends with people who value me as someone to have sex with rather than for my own merits as a friend. I find it insulting for my personality to be overlooked in the hopes of sex.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 08:25 AM
1

Ah that's a good point. I guess I would assume he did not see me as anything more than a friend, and I was incorrect. Or I would be worried that he had very low self esteem. It depends on the person and who they were. It's hard to say whether I would feel guilty about pressuring a man into a monogamous relationship because I can't even conceive doing it. I don't want to be with someone that requires force to want to be with me lol. I want someone who loves being with me and only me. Initially I …
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 07:23 AM
2

Oh don't make me show you evidence lol. There is so many. I even wrote my thesis on it. Key words are optimism bias, illusion of control. Can I just give you the main one? This is the article that started it all off. There have been probably hundreds since. Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210. It was actually a fascinating thing to study. Mentally healthy people rate themselves co…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 07:18 AM
1

Absolutely. I don't want people to be hurt or feel used by me because I don't like the feeling of being and hurt and used myself. That's what empathy is. The truth is that people still use people, but they do so while pushing past the guilt, not by having none. On a side note. When I understood that guys didn't just want to be my friend, I wanted to do the right thing, and told a guy that I just didn't have those kinds of feelings for him without any prompting from him (even though it was clear …
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 07:05 AM
1

Sorry, "needs" is probably too dramatic. Humans do require a relatively high self esteem to be able to function normally. Tests have shown that individuals with low self esteem and depression actually see the world more realistically. It is the individuals with a biased optimism about themselves that are the happy, productive members of society. Yes I did just say that the mentally "healthy" people are the ones who have more unrealistic biased positive images of the self and the world. Now every…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 06:43 AM
3

Again blinkers. "Women give sex and take resources". It's like you can't see past the 1950's where men were the breadwinners. In my previous relationship we earned almost equal amounts. We equally shared restaurant, food, and outing costs. I was also the one to put more effort into aiding him. I did his laundry when he needed it, I made him lunches to take to work, I bought him presents, I stocked his favourite foods, I even wrote out his resumes as he was looking for a better job. He was the on…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 06:29 AM
1

No, both people are making the choice. I'm attempting to understand the emotions behind the behaviour. For example if I wanted something and played on someones emotions to get it, I may still do it, but I would feel bad. I see a lot of lack of empathy in this subgroup of people and it makes me wonder if you guys just think the rest of the male population is like you because you don't lack the emotional ability to understand being a different way.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 06:19 AM
1

My point is that you feel no remorse for what you do. Yes you have made no obligation of commitment to these women, but you continue to sleep with them knowing that they probably hope you will. Technically it is not your fault at all, but on an emotional level most intelligent people would be able to understand that you have used their emotions to your own advantage and would feel something about it. The difference between red pills and everyone else is a lack of empathy. An inability to emotion…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 06:16 AM
1

I see some discrepancies so I am not sure if you were trying to affirm my narcissim theory, or descredit it. I mention that I see no evidence of empathy or guilt, and you said you have strong emotional ties to friends and family, but you will unfeelingly trample over people to get your own. You mention that you do have emotions, and gave examples of it, but I meant in relation to feeling empathy, an emotion about other people. A primary characteristic of narcissists. Your description of needing …
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 06:11 AM
0

So you are aware there is a high chance you may be taking advantage of this hope?
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 05:39 AM
6

I am concerned that your rejection of monogamy lays it's basis on a hatred of women still. Is it not possible if you did not feel this way about women, your desire to use them for your own means over partnering them and sharing each others lives would change? Your description of monogamy is that women "leech resources off men". It's almost like your blinkers filter out all the normal loving couples who equally give and take. And if you come across an "anamoly" where the woman has her resources l…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 05:29 AM
-1

You are suggesting women only ever have sex in order to gain a partner?
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 05:19 AM
2

No remorse for the stove analogy. Yes you are right, that I am using my ex as an example of deceiving women because that's what he did to me. However there is a "grey" area should I say. For example, he is currently gaming 3 women. Now I know, and he knows, that although he has not mentioned monogamy, that these girls want it, and are hoping for it. It is not his fault that they continue to hope for it when it's not going to be given, but most people would feel bad about taking advantage of this…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 05:10 AM
1

I got the impression from this subreddit that being "beta" was not being genuine.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 04:57 AM
1

You assume that all women want other men too?
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 04:56 AM
9

I have to question that society is built around womens desires. Monogamy has been happening for a very long time. Long before women had any, power, influence, or "valid" opinions. A male dominated society that wants polygamy would have gotten polygamy. While I agree that sometimes, in effort to balance injustices to how women were treated in the past, women are sometimes given too much of the opposite. I think there is often a valid argument for both sides the opposing sides fail to consider. I …
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 04:55 AM
0

Ha no, his quest for all women was steadily ongoing throughout the entire relationship from before begining to after end, it did not increase as he got "bored" of me. I have been on a journey of discovery about his mind. Originally it led to psychopathy. Lack of empathy, guilt, remorse, ability to charm, and manipulate, to lie, promiscuous sexual behaviour, emotional shallowness. But when I thought about it, I do remember times, unrelated to me where he did feel strong emotions. He can get angry…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 04:43 AM
6

That didn't address the statement though. You accused me of stiffling his manhood for my own happiness. But you didn't question that he would walk all over me for his happiness. It's like there is so much women hate, that it doesn't matter if a woman is happy or not, only if the guy is or isn't.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 04:26 AM
5

So what do successful female animals do? If there is a biological imperative for males to distribute their seed, then there should be a complementary female role. If females were happy to be used as just an incubator and then mother to their spawn, then they wouldn't be striving for monogamy. Their needs would be met once they had children. It seems if men are conquering a variety of vagina only, then they must not be living up to some biological standard of which you seem to ascribe to as being…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 04:23 AM
3

Nono I mean empathy relating to other area's of your life. For example if you see someone being bullied, or a little kid's dad just died. Do you feel empathy about situations unrelated to you or women?
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 03:48 AM
4

Everyone on here however is suggesting men never want a monogamous relationship, that they only think they do because they are being brainwashed by society and women. Do you think there are men who genuinely want a loving, mongamous, relationship?
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 03:45 AM
-5

Question. Would you feel guilty about leading on a woman for the intention of sex, while implying to her that you see a monogamous future in the relationship with her?
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 03:44 AM
5

I wonder if this carnal desire to seek out and tame strange pussy is age relevant though? Of course there are men who will continue to do this until they die. But there are a lot more men who seem to want to settle down, even after being players in their youth. Yes this could mean they were beaten down by society into monogamy, or it could mean an actual change in the way of thinking as you get older. The same way you now prefer Family guy over Ducktales, or coffee over chocolate milk (just exam…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 03:40 AM
-1

About the lack of guilt and empathy. Do you find it hard to feel it in other area's of your life, or is it more related to your treatment of women.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 03:27 AM
8

To be fair, I had no idea this is what he wanted. He kept it hidden. I didn't ask for monogamy, he did. If my happiness is more important to me than his, and this is evidenced by me wanting him to myself, then could it also not be said that his happiness is more important to him, evidenced by his sleeping around. A betrayal of trust that he requested.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 03:08 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter