| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| – | There is nothing wrong with not being selected by womenHey, I'm not saying we should go full Sharia law. I agree with what you said here: The idea that women are commodities to be distributed evenly among men is an abomination and a product of high control religious cults. And The fantasy of sexual communism is abhorrent, but it’s just a fantasy. Women aren’t objects for men to own. It's not that every man should get a state mandated girlfriend regardless of what kind of man he is. It's that the system that is currently in place - rampant uncontroll… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/10/24 07:21 AM |
| – | There is nothing wrong with not being selected by womenHistrionics. Homo sapiens thrived for 40,000 years before Abrahamic cultures forced arranged marriage on women. By this reasoning, animals and insects also thrive. I doubt you'd like living like our hunter-gatherer ancestors. The thriving you're talking about is civilization and society, which was initially enabled by enforced monogamy. Without enforced monogamy, there are a huge amount of 'unchosen' men, and these men will never see a reason to participate in society which will slowly but surel… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/09/24 07:05 PM |
| – | There is nothing wrong with not being selected by womenIn the end the process of natural selection must unfold free from any kind of interference or obstruction from reactionary, misogynistic forces therefore I think all men, chosen or unchosen, should advocate for the education, liberation and empowerment of women to ensure natural selection. So... like hunter-gatherer societies? What pulled us up and away from nature and into civilization, was this neat social technology called "marriage". 'Unselected' men may not be as hot or strong as 'selected'… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/09/24 06:51 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter