pupsicley Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
3	I was taken advantage of by a girl at my college during the superbowl a few years ago. I never admitted it to anyone for fear of being made fun of. Yeah seems unlikely a girl would go to that trouble, though if anyone would be crazy enough to do it, it probably would be a girl. Totally agree though. Anyone who thinks drunken sex is rape is an idiot.	/r/MensRights	24/07/12 08:27 AM
0	Book suggestions for teenage boys? "Game" books.	/r/MensRights	24/07/12 08:24 AM
-1	White Knights at Breakup Bar Not really. It's women's survival strategy. I have never met a woman who didn't at some point in her life use proxy aggression to manipulate others. No one has. It's absurd to think that such a perfect woman would exist. That's the only time I used the word "all" rather than a generalization. As far as the other stuff goes, clearly they are generalizations that apply to most women. I never said they apply to each and every single woman. We have to distinguish between the content of the statement…	/r/MensRights	24/07/12 08:21 AM
1	White Knights at Breakup Bar What problem? You mean there are men who live with a woman who NEVER in her entire life blamed him for something stupid she did? How insane are you? Have you ever had social interaction with a woman? Jeez, you honestly don't understand women at all if you really believe that. Or perhaps you are specifically referring to women's aggression and instigation of domestic violence. Yeah, I'm sure there are plenty of men who live with women and never have that problem. They're called manginas, they ALW…	/r/MensRights	24/07/12 08:15 AM
-1	White Knights at Breakup Bar We have to distinguish between the content of the statement “Women aren’t funny” and the statement “There aren’t women who are funny.” Conflating the two is a typical habit of leftists (and thus feminists); being nominalists, they take any normative statement (i.e., the former) as a universal statement (i.e., the latter), as referring to each and every possible woman rather than to the general form or essence of womanhood, from which there may be accidental deviations. Conclusion: You're dumb.	/r/MensRights	24/07/12 08:11 AM
-4	White Knights at Breakup Bar White knight. The difference is that my generalization is completely accurate, while feminist generalizations are complete bullshit. Have you lived for a year with a female significant other? You've never noticed the nagging? Jesus, you're either blind or ignorant.	/r/MensRights	24/07/12 01:39 AM
-1	Three heroes died in Aurora taking bullets for their girlfriends Oh, right, so they were all wives. Idiot. You must be an idiot to think every man sacrificed himself for some girl he was actually close to. Who's making the dumb assumption again?	/r/MensRights	24/07/12 01:36 AM
0	Three heroes died in Aurora taking bullets for their girlfriends Loved ones? No. Girlfriends. Girls they were having sex with, with some flimsy connection to them. Or maybe just girls who were friends. Men laid their lives down simply because the people they were with were women. It's stupid, it's 100% sexism. I can understand putting your life on the line for your wife, for the mother of your children. But just for some girl you happen to be hanging out with? That is bullshit, and the cultural conditioning that encourages it is pure sexism.	/r/MensRights	23/07/12 09:07 PM
-2	White Knights at Breakup Bar This is why cohabitating with women is so dangerous. Women NEVER take blame for their own actions, they ALWAYS blame the man, and they almost always cause domestic violence, then they make sure to make a ruckus so men with guns will come and punish you for defending yourself. How can a man love someone who is capable of doing that? Check out this AVfM article about how domestic violence REALLY happens: http://www.avoiceformen.com/men/how-to-slap-your-way-to-slavery/	/r/MensRights	23/07/12 08:55 PM