| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | It's people like this...It's people like that dude's dad.... | /r/MensRights | 07/08/11 02:38 AM |
| 3 | It's people like this...He's a victim of child abuse, which caused serious developmental problems. You can't blame them, all we can do is try to help. | /r/MensRights | 07/08/11 02:37 AM |
| 2 | Today I got told only one of my girls is actually mine. Interesting...Nobody seems to have mentioned this yet, but you should record incidences like this. Writing down what was said and when could help down the line if it comes to legal custody issues. | /r/MensRights | 25/07/11 11:10 PM |
| 1 | SF may ban infant circumcisionI actually agree, I don't want parents to circumcise their children but I don't think it's any of the government's business. I don't want to ban it, just spread awareness about why we shouldn't do it. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/11 07:25 AM |
| 2 | SF may ban infant circumcisionI don't mind it, I'm not sure if I like it better than uncircumcised since I never had the chance to experience it. That's the problem with infant circumcision: it has nothing to do with the act of cutting off the foreskin and whether people like it. The problem is cutting off a functional and natural piece of an infants body that will never grow back for aesthetic reasons. What if we tattoo'd around a child's finger or cut grooves in a foot? What if we branded our kids? Those could be done safe… | /r/MensRights | 23/02/11 08:12 PM |
| 2 | SF may ban infant circumcisionOne is a permanent aesthetic procedure, like getting a tattoo (only more permanent). One is a medical procedure that prevents disease or saves lives. I'm comfortable with parents making the second choice for children, not the first. | /r/MensRights | 23/02/11 08:06 PM |
| 7 | SF may ban infant circumcisionIt's not about that. It's about parents cutting off a piece of a baby that will never grow back, permanently changing their appearance. If someone wants to be circumcised or tattoo'd it should be their choice, not their parents. | /r/MensRights | 23/02/11 08:03 PM |
| 2 | Single men and women should receive the same tax benefits and penalties as married couples. No one should be punished being asexual or uninterested in marriage.Do you really think tax incentives have a large affect on marriage rates? | /r/MensRights | 27/08/10 09:06 PM |
| -2 | Single men and women should receive the same tax benefits and penalties as married couples. No one should be punished being asexual or uninterested in marriage.You're not solving the root problem of extortion though. Repeal all taxes. Have all government programs funded through donation. Problem solved. | /r/MensRights | 27/08/10 09:04 PM |
| 0 | Single men and women should receive the same tax benefits and penalties as married couples. No one should be punished being asexual or uninterested in marriage.No, married couples shouldn't receive any benefits. No one should be rewarded for being sexual or interested in marriage. | /r/MensRights | 27/08/10 09:01 PM |
| -1 | Single men and women should receive the same tax benefits and penalties as married couples. No one should be punished being asexual or uninterested in marriage.I don't accept that premise. Do you have any evidence to support it? | /r/MensRights | 27/08/10 09:00 PM |
| 2 | Where The Boys Aren't - *The gender gap on college campuses*Do you think this is intentional on the part of colleges/governments? | /r/MensRights | 06/07/10 09:19 PM |
| 1 | How many of us on the mensrights subreddit are younger men?Fuck buddies for life is the way to go! | /r/MensRights | 05/04/10 05:14 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter