pushistick1 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
6	Women constantly talk about how immoral men can be in regards to their sexuality. Are women generally any better, or are they even worse? Women are generally better as they don't act on their possible "immoral" fantasies as much as men do. Wtf are you even on about in the rest of the post lol? Dating a trump supporter? What does it have to do with the question in the title? Wtf is this retarded post	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/08/20 10:12 PM
3	Why shouldn't we objectify people who dress sexily/skimpily? Or we could just keep on the path of successfully persecuting men for their disgusting behavior. That pretty much works. Tighter laws, better outcomes. Street harrassment laws are quite new. Although, it doesn't make the men in the legal system very happy. Regardless of that, it wouldn't work thematically since men divert their attention to new details. It's about as efficient as it wasn't with clothing considered relatively conservative. In the 60s and 50s.	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/08/20 04:10 PM
5	Why shouldn't we objectify people who dress sexily/skimpily? That would be the equivalent of someone looking you in the eye the wrong way as an invitation to get punched in the face. Men already know that many women are disgusted by most of them, unless they have an iq of 70 maybe.	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/08/20 04:00 PM
3	Why shouldn't we objectify people who dress sexily/skimpily? In a workplace setting for example. Street harrassment laws (Even though it varies from state to state, and isn't taken as seriously as in Europe just yet). Slowly but surely getting there. Need to expand its legal definition.	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/08/20 03:57 PM
5	Why shouldn't we objectify people who dress sexily/skimpily? Social shaming isn't where it stops. There's actual persecution of such actions as they're considered of legal status in some areas. The fact that most men are indeed crude, therefore its occurance is so prevalent doesn't mean much - as women get this undesireable attention regardless of how they are dressed. Those complain about it occuring as well. The men who have enough lack of shame can only be stopped through physical persecution in various degrees. Both shaming and holding them physically…	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/08/20 03:50 PM
8	Why shouldn't we objectify people who dress sexily/skimpily? Unfortunately with your crude nature, stopping such behavior is impossible. Not even a burka can help against that. Creating a sense of scarcity only migrates your attention to new details. Shaming and holding men accountable men for the ability to control themselves just enough to not shit their pants is good. And it seems to be working in reality, as you're far more cautious out of fear. Slowly but surely getting the desireable results.	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/08/20 03:29 PM
14	Why shouldn't we objectify people who dress sexily/skimpily? It's called the human decency to not borther people with your crude behavior unless you get an inventation to directly from them. Or is it you admit that men are retarded 5 year olds who cannot contain themselves and have little self control developed. I agree that men are mostly that (don't develop past the age of 10 in some regards), but we should not encourage their retarded behavior. Like with dogs, we should only reward their tamed self.	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/08/20 03:00 PM
3	sekhmet she owl: marry men with money If you're going to date, might as well do it with financially secure men, obviously. There isn't an advantage in dating rich men because they usually don't share their wealth, unless there is an established "sugar baby" status. The only advantage I could think of is rich men with certain connections that can advance you personally. It's not plausible for most average women to date a "man with loads of money". It's not an advantage as they secure their wealth, and the bits of money they give thei…	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/08/20 06:41 AM
3	Do you want to be loved for your abilities, accomplishments, and achievements by someone you're dating? No. You wrote not to the same degree. Pay attention to what you write. The "love" for a youthful attractive look isn't considered interchangeable to loving one specific person.	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/08/20 04:51 AM
4	Do you want to be loved for your abilities, accomplishments, and achievements by someone you're dating? Lol what? Beauty isn't permenant. As well as it's tranferable with a younger version, better version. But sure you can make some emotionally driven bogus claims of a men's love fairytale. It's just not reality, sorry to inform you.	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/08/20 04:35 AM
5	Do you want to be loved for your abilities, accomplishments, and achievements by someone you're dating? That is in relation to how you define love. Which is a stimulation in the brain. Men and women both "love" each other for perks they provide. Whether the man sees the woman's beauty as a perk or a woman seeing his financial situation and psychological state as a perk. By that admission nobody really "loves" someone in the infantilized retarded idea of some outside of this world experience. The only real feeling of "loving" someone just because they exist manifests itself in a child-parent type o…	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/08/20 04:26 AM
2	Do you want to be loved for your abilities, accomplishments, and achievements by someone you're dating? Not really. That's literally what loving someone for their abilities and accomplishments is. You value something personally beneficial in the relationship. Whether it's a man that has accomplished something in a specific field you find helpful in other realms, or a physicial embodiment of the type of personality you seek (i.e. hard-working, creative, volunteering...) Phsycological or physical benefit.	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/08/20 01:08 AM
2	Do you want to be loved for your abilities, accomplishments, and achievements by someone you're dating? I don't see any other way I can be "loved" under my own definition. Though, i've never loved a man. But from the feeling of "love" I have experienced for other people in my life - it comes down to the personal abilities I appreciate they have in regards to me. I can be impressed by their accomplishments and achievements. But they mean little if they don't benefit me personally.	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/08/20 12:31 AM
1	What are your thoughts on Germaine Greer's argument that, physical violence is worse than girls being pressured into non-consensual sex, since if physical violence wasn't worse, girls would easily say no because they would be more scared of the non-consensual sex rather than the violence. Lol, and now you're nitpicking on a typo after making the retarded post. Indeed, a mouth breather.	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/08/20 12:31 AM
3	What are your thoughts on Germaine Greer's argument that, physical violence is worse than girls being pressured into non-consensual sex, since if physical violence wasn't worse, girls would easily say no because they would be more scared of the non-consensual sex rather than the violence. I phrased her since I can't find the exact quote; a lot of her interviews are behind a paywall. I did not know we accept this form of retardation on this sub. I knew a lot of men on here are mouth breathers, but not to the extent of taking such post seriously with no actual phrasing. Lol.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/08/20 11:49 PM
3	What is the effect of women respecting men? What should men do if they do not want this attention from a woman? If we started to respect men we would become even more retarded as a whole. Since most of them aren't worthy of respect with their useless, limited iq self. No, that doesn't automatically lead to sexual attraction. If you do not want respect, you probably just have to act like the average man.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/08/20 10:43 PM
5	If women are hornier or equally horny as men then why don’t attractive women have casual meaningless sex with low value men like attractive men do with low value women? Being horny isn't the same for everyone, having different sociatal standards and expectations. Even if women are hornier, they know they will receive backlash for sleeping with every man they might possibly desire. They kind of forgot that historically women have been much more restricted and punished harshly for their sexual desire.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/08/20 10:33 PM
2	Q4W: Do you believe that your time, presence and attention is inherently more valuable than a man's? Everyone can set whatever standards they want. Where they fall into the trap is thinking that they have to cater to one without the other catering back. If someone was interested in me but they weren't funny or barely had a personality, I wouldn't be interested in them and they'd probably wonder why or just get mad that I wasn't interested. I've had women suck their teeth before when I didn't reciprocate but it seems like none of them ever think "Hmmm maybe I'm just not fun or interesting enough…	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/08/20 10:21 AM
5	Q4W: Do you believe that your time, presence and attention is inherently more valuable than a man's? It is a personal preference. X should cater to me because I can set such standard. Such standard tests the amount of interest one has in another. As a phenomena, it seems to be a modernized version of past sociatal standards and roles. The modernized version in which women have been granted the ability to personally choose as opposed to someone choosing for them based upon value. Men devalue themselves. Your sexual and romantic advances are abundant to the women a lot of you find atttactive. You…	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/08/20 08:16 AM
1	Is the marriage/birth rate declining because women don't want it? Or is it because men are of increasingly low quality. To what declining birth rate are you referring to? Overall birth rates are declining because we don't need to pump 7-12 kids to reassure the family will be secured financially, securing the continuation of the bloodline. As well as an emphasis on women's health in regard to possible birth complications. Thus, the birth rate is declining EVERYWHERE around the world. The micro specific declining birth rate and marriage rate in western countries is related to a woman's self fulfillment, changes in …	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/08/20 07:17 AM
2	What would happen to dating if the red pill were to become mainstream? If the red pill would to become mainstream to what extent? If it would become a legitimate philosophy given a widespread platform, taking form in political discussion forums - it is basically going back in time with a twist of an overwhelming amount of incomptent mamas boys. As their female hatred rheotic boils down to lack of control, what they would try to work on is gaining back that control they were granted by their own admission prior the second wave of feminism (i.e. marital rape, affirma…	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/08/20 04:26 AM