TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

putamanoutofaplane Archive

View 3 posts and 120 comments by putamanoutofaplane on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I don't respect women because they were born women or men because they were bor men or whites because they were born white. You said I should (read your comment). Why I don't respect Feminists is a different question: they chose to support an ideology and movement that is partly a hate movement and ideology.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 09:53 AM
1

I have little respect for Feminists. I know too much about them. But that has nothing to do with my respect for women. And, anyway, being born female or male - or white or whatever - doesn't give any respect points in itself.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 09:29 AM
1

The world used to be unfair and full of violence until we got civilized. That's about the most amazing thing that has happened to the humankind. It was done by women and men. You just misread me in your Feminist frenzy.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 10:27 PM
19

What does it tell about our world that these ... stupid and immoral people have adds in their subreddit, while this subreddit doesn't? Hatred and scorn is good?
/r/MensRights20/01/18 09:56 PM
22

Where I live there's a presidential campaign going on. One of the candidates is a Social Democrat and a Feminist. So she is all for equality, right? :D Actually she told that as the president she wants to put women and girls first. When asked, she said that the conscription army shouldn't apply to women. A typical Feminist asshole, in other words. About 1-2% of people is going to vote for her. The world is sometimes OK.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 08:57 PM
9

If not, why don't we see feminists denouncing people like Andrea Dworkin, Germaine Greer, Valerie Solanas etc.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 08:30 PM
10

"Fact" is a logical conclusion based on premises. It's the foundation of all science. Sometimes laymen confuse "fact" with "truth". but they are two different things. It seems that you made that error but I'm not sure.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 07:40 PM
9

Come on, it's Wikipedia! Every now and then you stumble on a fact that's not erased by some ideological fool.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 05:13 PM
7

There was a program on TV of a German serial killer the other night. What got me thinking was that there were two men that were sentenced for a murder that Kroll had committed. Furthermore there were two men who killed themselves. because they were suspected for murders committed by Kroll. Then the attorney told Kroll not to speak to the police, so, we can only guess how many more men could have been acquitted if he had told more. Theses kind of things are the main reason why I'm happy that I li…
/r/MensRights20/01/18 02:54 PM
0

Not only in the USA. But I was pleased that over here where I live the state forbade the "women's studies" and forced the universities to teach "gender studies" instead (all universities are public here). I've been told that the sexists/feminists had to drop a lot of the misandrist stuff. It's still sexist bullshit but most of the hatred is gone.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 02:18 PM
125

Most lesbians pretty much stop having sex unless one of them is masculine.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 01:55 PM
2

"But, please Mrs police officer, I meditated for hours before the flight."
/r/MensRights20/01/18 01:52 PM
1

"Cunt" has been used as a swear word, originally, not because it's offensive but because cunt is a magically perhaps the strongest word. I don't know, but the guy could be Swedish. "Fittan" (cunt) over there is like "fuck" in English. Anywyas, it's nice that some men have the guts to stand up against the sexist/feminist fittor who try to silence men.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 01:41 PM
2

If you call me "nigger" first it's legit to call you "nazi". No?
/r/MensRights20/01/18 10:54 AM
1

Nowadays the state has the right to "beat", punish, you. Does that mean that we, the citizens, are not a valuable resource? Does it mean that we are slaves? Before the modern, civilized times societies were hierarchical. Everyone and everything was under somebody. And that somebody had the right to use even violence. The idea was to uphold law and order in an - unfair - society that always was at the brink of collapsing. The system was not just - to our modern sentiments - but it was successful …
/r/MensRights20/01/18 09:57 AM
1

Men were, in fact, slaves, because they were penalized if they didn't provide for their wives (aka owners). That's a fact, too, but, earnestly, I wouldn't call them slaves. That just was the way to organize a successful agricultural society: women had the responsibility of the household while men. being stronger, had the responsibility everything outside the house. If he didn't have the power the family could perish because he was the one, often the only one, who could put enough bread on the ta…
/r/MensRights20/01/18 09:24 AM
1

Don't say that women were slaves if you want to be taken seriously, eh?
/r/MensRights19/01/18 06:28 PM
1

You are trapped in an an idea that's not true. Women were not slaves but looked after, a precious "resource". Stop reading and believing in Feminist bullshit, and you'll be a better person in the long run.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 06:04 PM
2

Hopefully Scotland Yard's head is not a Feminist.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 02:40 PM
5

Given the current widespread conversation around diversity and inclusion in the workplace (and especially in the tech industry) It's likely, given the wording, that their non-tech employees, language and teaching experts, tend to be women, but they don't see that as a problem.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 04:50 AM
1

If there are arranged marriages it goes, naturally, both ways. All traditional agricultural societies had/have arranged marriages, meaning that both men and women had/have to marry the spouse that was/is elected by the parents (if they didn't the society wouldn't have survived but let's not go there). The bottom line, the ultimate bottom line in those traditional societies wasn't things like if some odd dude had a mistress but who could survive. Who and whose children could get enough food and w…
/r/MensRights18/01/18 07:10 PM
1

Here's a pretty typical arrangement between the "slaves" and their "masters": Daughters had the right for a husband, who had to provide for her. In addition they go the dowry that remained her property no matter what. That didn't always happen but it was the norm everybody was supposed to accept. Sons had no rights, except for the oldest son who inherited the property - not solely for himself, but also for his wife and children.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 06:41 PM
1

Arranged marriages affected both sexes, most men weren't allowed to vote either (and some women were), if the wife was beaten, the husband could be publicly flogged. On the other hand husbands had to provide for their wives.If not, they became outcasts or could even get jailed. But, hey, I don't blame you. We are fed this Feminist view since childhood. To know what really happened you need a lot of unlearning and studying.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 06:19 PM
1

A lying Feminist is a surprise and something to be taken seriously now? I mean, if she had just lied that would have been OK, but because she copied somebody's text, that's a huge problem! Double standards by the leftists.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 04:29 PM
0

You are definitely on to something. Incentives steer people as a general, statistical rule. Perhaps you've read Freakonomics (and the following books, as well as the blog)? But I don't think that men get laughed at or mocked, at least her where I live. The rejection, of the idea of a man getting raped, is more subtle. And even if it wasn't, men fear that they are not treated well by the people who are supposed to help, investigate and prosecute.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 04:23 PM
9

Fragile masculinity means something different. It's s a strange idea that the masculine identity must be always strengthened with all kinds of manly, non-feminine things. If not, it will crumble. Women's identity, on the other hand, is genuine and strong and thus no strengthening is needed. So, as we all know, the department stores are full of manly things that men need to survive and almost no female things. No? Well, you have to take into account that this is Feminist talk and, as usual, has a…
/r/MensRights17/01/18 06:39 PM
1

Well, because the male role is the result of female role expectations, to a great extent, it's probably good for men to get to know something about the homosexual role expectations. They are certainly more relaxed because gays don't fight for a really scarce resource, sex, and don't have to fit into the tiny "role box" where women like their men most. (Of course all this is more complicated: women's expectations "spill over" to the rest of the society, most women don't want a very macho man, mac…
/r/MensRights17/01/18 04:14 PM
1

Feminists facts should have a chapter of their own in all methodology text books. Now even educated people might think that they have something to do with true facts.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 03:22 PM
4

Recording all voices would be enough in most cases. And that's something you could probably do legally in some places without even telling about it. And if not, more women would be OK with it, at least more OK than with filming.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 06:06 PM
6

Why not after sex?
/r/MensRights16/01/18 06:01 PM
9

Condescending and ignorant, comes to mind. Don't trust these kind of people. Basically Feminism is about getting benefits to the sex that is clearly better off (in the first world countries). And nothing wrong with that. Privileged people, too , can have their activists and advocates. But never believe when they tell that they are striving for everybody's equality. There's almost nothing to back up that claim.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 03:45 PM
2

Yeah, but I was talking about the actual reason why women on average earn less.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 12:06 PM
1

in a time when they were basically slaves LOL
/r/MensRights16/01/18 08:13 AM
2

Shouldn't we aiming at a lower libido for men in these troubled times?
/r/MensRights16/01/18 08:10 AM
8

A risk assessment of Perez was conducted by a social worker prior to her sentencing. The social worker's report alleges that Osborne was Perez's "drug dealer," and that he asked her to make the video. That's what happened. The coercion part seems to be an interpretation of their relationship dynamics.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 08:01 AM
8

A working link.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 07:53 AM
10

It's 1550% in total. The employment rate must be pretty awesome to achieve that.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 07:50 AM
3

It's truly strange that the author, even in her middle ages, seems totally ignorant about the fact that it's women's hypergamy that leads women to these situations where "every man is the same". If they dated average joes the problem wouldn't exist. But when they "all" want these "alphas" they are going to end up with guys who take advantage of the situation. Who could tell women what they are and where it leads? Apparently nobody is telling at the moment.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 07:46 AM
2

It's because women have had the vote only for a short time and even now there are less female politicians. And men always look after their own interests. Right? Or is it only me who see a slight problem in this kind of argumentation?
/r/MensRights16/01/18 07:33 AM
8

Male dentists tend to earn more than female ones, though, because they tend to work more. In particular if they have children. That's the main reason behind the pay gap.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 07:22 AM
1

There a lot of people in the USA who are not well off. Like black men (on average and in the marginal). Measuring the quality of life is something that has been done in the academia for ages. I explained how the paternity leave is hurting men in the jobs market. I don't think it's that difficult to understand. You were blaming the victim by saying that it's men's own fault that they don't seek medical help as often as women. If you are suggesting that men should join Feminists that's just crazy.…
/r/MensRights15/01/18 04:46 PM
4

Fighting for the paternity leave is counter-productive for men. Hell, Feminists support it and that alone tells that it's not good for men but women. Women's education is already a lot better, women also get offered jobs a lot more. Pretty much the only advantage men have is that employers consider women a risk because they have this privilege of staying home. If men had the same privilege even that advantage would be gone. That's not the whole story but explains why Feminists support the idea s…
/r/MensRights15/01/18 02:49 PM
2

Antifeminism isn't an ideology, though. Immoral Feminists preach their religion though they know it's not a fair description of the world, just out of hate or something. But, hey that sounds interesting: is there really a campaign against harassment that is supposed to help men too? Sounds like a misunderstanding or perhaps something they just lie about. But I might be wrong.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 01:38 PM
2

I never put people anywhere. But Feminists, unfortunately, as well as many other supporters of ideologies, like racism, do put themselves in boxes that have such labels as stupid, ignorant, immoral, hateful. How good the life would be if people dropped the ideologies and started to think for themselves. But that's not going to happen, so, I just keep ridiculing them whenever I can.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 01:09 PM
20

A frank TV-series about a Feminist dystopia would be very interesting. But that would be too audacious and it's not going to happen, nobody has the guts to finance or make it.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 08:32 AM
17

It's as if she didn't understand that the Feminist goal is to police men's thoughts and the way they talk (mansplaining, cat calling campaign etc) and men's actions (metoo, manspreading etc). In the end they want men who never think, speak, or act without first considering women's feelings and seeking their acceptance. It's as if she didn't understand that, at the same time, the idea is to get women the maximum amount of freedom in the way they think, speak, and act (slut march, Feminist hate sp…
/r/MensRights15/01/18 07:21 AM
3

Yeah, some are immoral.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 06:30 AM
4

You must live in a very tight a Feminist bubble if you haven't heard how the education system discriminate against boys and men.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 06:29 AM
7

You should first check out which sex has a better quality of life. Then you should check out which sex has its issues on the political agenda and which doesn't. Then you should reconsider your stance on which sex has catching up to do. Or "should" if you want to understand the world we live in. If you don't that understandable, almost no-one wants to.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 06:21 AM
4

So she thinks men normally bash women like this and her contention is that women shouldn't sink to the level of men. Yeah, pretty common female attitude. But at least she's trying.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 06:10 AM
3

Plus quite a few eastern European countries
/r/MensRights15/01/18 06:07 AM
2

It's interesting how Feminists think that they are becoming the next big thing and there just a few small obstacles left (like them being a hate group). But this idea looks so much like just another Feminist "fact" meaning that the reality is pretty much the opposite. I seems to me that more and more people are seeing Feminism the way it is - and that's definitely not a good thing for them. So I predict and prey god that they are losing not winning.
/r/MensRights14/01/18 07:42 PM
33

human race (women) Apparently she doesn't think men are human.
/r/MensRights14/01/18 03:34 PM
2

Two movements that utilize the same human traits and wants (gynocentrism, protecting women, manhood that has to be earned, loathing of unmasculine men and so forth). The goals are different, though. Conservatives want to conserve, Feminists want to change, engineer the society.
/r/MensRights14/01/18 09:01 AM
3

Just a few women in the comments, almost none condemning the article. Just saying that despising men is so common among women - their way of talking about men - that they don't necessarily feel shocked by this kind of shit at all.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 06:48 PM
4

The judge told them, if I understood correctly, that they have to try and try till they find a test that always produces an equal outcome. That means, doesn't it, that they have to drop all physically demanding testing. Or they have to have separate tests for men and women. But what if no woman or only totally unfit women apply? The only just solution is not to have any men pass the test either.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 02:48 PM
1

Sometimes even a strangely clever feminist might think that the 1% of all property is owned by women is not true. Where does all the money women inherit, for example, go, they ponder? Well, the grim truth is that the patriarchy forces women to change all their inherited property into cash and then go to the backyard and burn it in a big bonfire.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 05:12 PM
6

So, Julie Bindel is a proof that women are better than men. Come on!
/r/MensRights12/01/18 04:57 PM
1

This should be expanded to cover the tendency to get alarmed whenever something troubling happens or is suspected to happen to girls and women and pretty females in particular.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 01:34 PM
5

Group attribution error, see also sterotyping and essentialism. Here's, by the way, a great mind map of the cognitive biases you can find in Wikipedia. Many of them explain why ideologies and movements like Feminism exist.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 01:23 PM
1

Group attribution error, see also sterotyping and essentialism. Here's, by the way, a great mind map of the biases you can find in Wikipedia. Many of them explain why ideologies and movements like Feminism exist.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 01:17 PM
3

Sounds like a hopeless interview. If the professor is truly a Feminist she(?) probably knows next to nothing about these things. Instead she probably thinks that men have the upper hand in the "mating game" and use their power to oppress women etc. Even explaining the basic facts will in all likelihood turn out to be impossible. I hope I'm wrong but ...
/r/MensRights11/01/18 03:05 PM
17

The responsible advice is to call for hep and not get involved unless you know for sure what you're doing. These should be taken down.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 02:35 PM
3

Major in women's studies and make a career out of claiming that nothing is what it looks like except for misogyny.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 07:54 AM
3

We have two sons and my wife knows a lot about the problems boys - and men - face. She's not exactly an anti-feminist but seems to think that they are mostly wrong or even evil. Still she thinks that there is some kind of a morally virtuous core buried somewhere deep down. But we never really discuss these things, feminism or MRA, just mention them in passing.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 04:52 PM
7

The proportion of female pilots recruited by Easyjet has doubled amid attempts to make its flight crew more diverse and to cut a huge gender pay gap ... So it's basically a plan to look good in the eyes of Feminists, never mind safety.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 09:45 PM
43

Sometimes a Feminist is so ultra-stupid that she doesn't know that the Feminist ideas should never be discussed in public. They just crumble.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 05:14 PM
3

That will come right after #MyPetToo has been turned into a resolution protecting cute animals from men's sexual advances in the UN.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 04:27 PM
2

It's because media loves those studies and ignores most of the rest, not to talk about those that show men being better.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 09:53 AM
2

If the focus was on psychological abuse there would be hundreds, thousands of studies proving that men are the perpetrators almost always. There would be also objective studies proving something different but they would be ignored.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 09:49 AM
3

I can't read the whole article (should register or something) but apparently it's about average life expectancies. If men's life expectancy drops to 18, for example, it means that a lot of male babies are dying. And there are differences between the sexes here. Male babies die more often because of many reasons but particularly they die of infections. So, during epidemics or when mothers are to weak to resist infections because of hunger it's boys who die more often. Girls just have a better res…
/r/MensRights09/01/18 09:44 AM
208

In the past several months, women across the country have become more vocal about their rights, from standing up to sexual harassment to supporting each other in the workplace. Between the clear (data-proven) benefits of hiring women, that women are outperforming men in school, and the fact that most recruiters are women (who want to support other women), it makes 100% sense why women might be getting a boost when they apply for jobs. Job Search Tip: To all the women out there who might question…
/r/MensRights08/01/18 07:32 PM
5

Yeah, I seem to remember that a majority of stalkers are women at least according to one study - or was it court statistics.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 05:58 PM
17

the menace of domestic violence affects both men and women depending on who is stronger The very first sentence seems to prove that the author doesn't know what she's talking about. The more violent is often the one who is weaker: who can't control herself and knows that, because she's weaker, won't face violence in return.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 03:48 PM
3

But if it's the parents who pay for it they have a say. Besides, not all are adults when the decision is made. Furthermore, even if they are 18 parents still care.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 03:37 PM
3

What kind of parents send their son there? Shouldn't they be accused of negligence or something by the state?
/r/MensRights08/01/18 01:46 PM
7

It's not a scam. She's just counting on such feminine virtues as generosity. It pretty much says so in the article, I mean, if you're willing to pay $1200 to get taught entrepreneurship by somebody with her credentials, you must be generous.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 09:56 AM
11

If a boy or girl doesn't tell that he or she is underage and looks like over 16 and you have consensual sex with him or her it's common to not convict the "perpetrator". That't how it's in northern Europe, at least.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 08:26 AM
2

She seems to get her "facts" from feminists, women's magazines, and her sexist worlview so she knows little about what 's really going on in the real world.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 09:33 PM
1

Yeah, disgust but not only that. Most "true" Feminists have a strong group identity and dissenting voices are a social threat - perhaps the most difficult obstacle for them to conquer. Disgust is a fear for something that contaminates your soul but also something you could get over with, heal. A social threat is something that could contaminate your identity, all the values and goals that make you what you really are, by questioning the group that has build wall of righteousness around you. That…
/r/MensRights07/01/18 06:51 PM
51

Only privileged shitheads think that they can spread their sexist and racist ideology to 13-year-olds in a public school and get away with it.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 04:39 PM
2

The respectful thing to do with people you disagree with is engage with them through an exchange of ideas. One of the very fundamental things that people should understand about Feminist is that they can's discuss things openly. They used to try when the discussion forums were a new thing. But it became apparent soon that their ideology was based on so much bullshit that a civil and critical discussion was impossible. Furthermore they had the moral issues, like the fact that hiding the contempt …
/r/MensRights07/01/18 04:25 PM
3

The guardian of sexism and gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 03:43 PM
18

The only fault I found is when she wrote: Of course, women are sexually harassed in the tech industry just as they are harassed in every other industry in which they work There are lots of industries where employees are mostly or altogether women, where there are no customers or customers are girls or women and where women don't usually get harassed. There are slao vast amounts of small businesses where women never get harassed. She could also have added that men, too, get sexually harassed in m…
/r/MensRights07/01/18 02:49 PM
1

As long as they do the same work and the same hours So, let's say that you and I worked the same hours and did he same work but I made two times more money to the company than you. Nevertheless our wages would be the same. Let's say that I had no problem with that (though in reality I would have). Everybody would work happily ever after? Unfortunately not so. After a while the company next door would hear that I was particularly good at my work and they would offer me more than what I was gettin…
/r/MensRights07/01/18 10:08 AM
4

This is what the poor Swedish students will be missing now: The move from a structuralist account in which capital is understood to structure social relations in relatively homologous ways to a view of hegemony in which power relations are subject to repetition, convergence, and rearticulation brought the question of temporality into the thinking of structure, and marked a shift from a form of Althusserian theory that takes structural totalities as theoretical objects to one in which the insight…
/r/MensRights06/01/18 09:28 PM
0

Judith Butler would in all likelihood object to this and demand that all genders should have their own 40%. Everything below 10 000% would be totally inappropriate and oppressive.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 09:22 PM
1

Women, on the other hand, are surging into expanding sectors such as health care and education, helped by their superior skills. Or because men fear to enter those fields because of the anti-male atmosphere or get discriminated against when they try. But, of course, I'm not expecting a mainstream media outlet to entertain such "outrageous ideas" that men could be actually discriminated against or face sexism. Even children know that it's a men's world and it's women who get oppressed. Hell, I'm …
/r/MensRights06/01/18 05:06 PM
2

Was the study really that bad? If women are afraid to speak up in a STEM class something could be done about it. Or course it's not sure if that's the case after interviewing eight students, but IF it is. The same way, most of the education system that strongly favors girls and women should be changed so that more boys could feel comfortable and motivated, not excluded and overlooked.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 09:55 AM
17

Hi Americans, don't you think it's crazy to put parents behind the bars because their houses are filthy? Wouldn't it be a better idea to consult and in general help the parents - and in this case the mother in particular - to get their lives back on track? (Not that I think that this isn't happening in many states, but because I don't know which ones I stated the question to all citizens of the USA :D )
/r/MensRights06/01/18 09:40 AM
2

An oppressed class whose well-being and quality of life is much better than that of the "oppressors", whom the governments all over the world give special benefits and privileges, which is not expected to be prepared to die while defending their "oppressors". Why don't I get oppressed!
/r/MensRights06/01/18 08:43 AM
1

And, above all, the education gap - that threatens the whole western way of life.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 08:33 AM
9

Furthermore, you can argue that women are by far more violent if you only look at the violence that is one sided. There are also studies arguing that women start the violence more often. On the other hand, it's pretty hard to form a balanced view because for every objective study there are several feminist studies which tend to cherry pick or otherwise break the scientific rules in favor of their political agenda.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 08:16 AM
4

Men need feminists the same way blacks need the Ku Klux Klan. And this is not a joke.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 07:57 AM
8

Guys behaving badly is a pretty universal experience for many high-school girls because they are attracted to the same guys who then take advantage of the situation. For guys it's totally different, and many of them can end up having a far too positive ideas of the opposite sex. This discrepancy then has huge effects on the society.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 07:38 AM
6

These "hashtags" have been discussed in the UN, dozens of parliaments, mainstream media, thousands of workplaces and so on. It's enormous, no other group, movement, ideology can boast that they could achieve the so much even if they put a lot more resources to it. It's frightening.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 10:12 PM
6

The way metoo, heforshe, mansplaining etc spread overt the western world seems to indicate that feminism is gaining speed not slowing down.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 10:04 PM
14

What seems to be common to most Feminists is that they don't understand men and relationships but, in particular, they don't understand women.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 10:01 PM
1

If only we had a martian we could ask which sex has more "privalages" in the west. I'm pretty sure the Martian would think the answer was pretty self-evident if we showed her the life quality statistics.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 08:52 PM
3

The same way women, on average, make much more money than men with, for example, fashion or food blogging.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 08:41 PM
13

Why do (certain) men get sexually harassed by women then? She doesn't understand the problem so the solution is bound to be false.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 07:01 PM
11

And men don't neglect their health at all, you sexist pigs?
/r/MensRights05/01/18 03:26 PM
6

There are a lot of people - mostly feminists - on the Internet who'll turn against anybody who's advocating for the wrongly accused.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 06:55 AM
25

Perhaps they put children's health last. But whatever the case, this is yet another sign of gynocentrism that plagues modern societies. It would be almost impossible to imagine a tag line like that saying that the company is putting men first - unless it was a company directing its products only to men and even then it would sound like a dangerous idea.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 06:51 AM
189

So, in the USA all male models, for example, should be paid the same as the female models unless the employers can prove that the females are demanded more skill, effort, responsibility, or the working conditions are different. But in the real life it doesn't work that way. Employees get paid according to their productivity (how much money they bring in) and the top female models thus get paid several times more than the male ones. (In particular, that's true when each employee negotiates her or…
/r/MensRights05/01/18 06:34 AM
1

As Irina Dunn said all the way back in 1970: A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle[17]. Women just want men to treat them as equals. And I respect that. I’m all for gender equality. Actually there is a gigantic industry and movement that wants women to be treated better than men. Of course they deny it but there is no way around it: there is a huge number of women and activists who think that equality means tha women are preferred in education, firms, families, courts, politics and so …
/r/MensRights04/01/18 06:40 AM
1

LoL
/r/MensRights03/01/18 09:51 PM
1

LoL
/r/MensRights03/01/18 09:50 PM
3

It would be really interesting to read a translation of the law because, well, it just sounds like lunacy. Who will get paid the same as somebody else? Will young men who usually earn less than young women get paid the same, for example? Or is it really that only women will get paid more? Even when they are deemed less productive by the employer. I mean, there must be some kind of a logic behind the law but what is it? The worst scenario would be that employers refused to employ women (or men) b…
/r/MensRights03/01/18 08:09 PM
1

It goes almost completely unread, not only by everyone outside the field, but also by almost everyone inside the field too (more than 80% of its papers do not receive a single citation). Nice that somebody has looked up (hopefully) the actual figure. I have always known that almost everything Feminists do in the academia is in the fringe. But that they don't even care to read each other, that was news. I've also known that many academic men hate Feminism because, well, they aren't crazy but don'…
/r/MensRights03/01/18 07:50 PM
3

I should stop reading the batshit crazy feminists because they suck the life out of me like the Brazilian vampire bats.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 07:08 PM
2

Can we make women 110% safe is the big question. Should we "KillAllMen"? Or is it enough to separate men from women. Send us to Madagascar, perhaps?
/r/MensRights02/01/18 04:31 PM
6

get help
/r/MensRights02/01/18 04:24 PM
0

Banned
/r/MensRights31/12/17 09:09 PM
3

In the service of God, not art so much.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 10:51 AM
3

You don't need a citation, you need to read what Feminists talk about here.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 10:40 AM
5

Yeah, I planned 20 days ahead to answer to your post today. Ain't that clever! Anyways, most Feminists here are immoral persons or/and don't care about facts. What's irritating is that somebody tries really hard to make excuses for an argument that endorses genocide after what has happened during the past hundred years or so. As a European, I just don't get it. Even if your opinion sounds right, because "hell, everybody talks this way in my bubble", you're not really, not in the moral sense, pri…
/r/MensRights31/12/17 09:53 AM
3

It's not uncommon in these feminist times that women see men as potential predators and pedophiles. But, yeah, in a marriage it just doesn't work,
/r/MensRights31/12/17 09:38 AM
17

Lots of women are actually killing men, literally (yes they are though, as a feminist, you don't know anything about that). I don't think we should encourage them - the way many Germans encouraged the Nazis, for example. And, in general, we shouldn't spread the idea that men and boys are worth so little that you can even jokingly say that we should be killed. Like "kill all Jews and niggers, heh". It's 2017, shouldn't we be better than that?
/r/MensRights31/12/17 09:19 AM
20

You're so wrong on so many levels. But let's forget the moral and factual issues. How do I intuitively see this woman? She's somebody who's made a career out of hate (among other things, of course) and can't see clearly anymore. That's about it. Nothing else, like her appearances, comes to mind. Not even her sex, with so many male feminists spreading hatred out there. The big question for me is this: how can somebody make a career out of hatred? Yes, it was pretty standard in the good old days b…
/r/MensRights31/12/17 08:59 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter