TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

puthisrecordown Archive

View 0 posts and 31 comments by puthisrecordown on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

they literally have jobs fuck off.
/r/MensRights17/02/22 08:00 AM
2

And what made you assume they're housewives? My cousins both have their own long-standing full-time jobs.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 10:27 PM
1

Who are parastites?
/r/MensRights16/02/22 10:12 PM
7

From my observation of the dynamics in my own family, couldn't this be because women make so many of the shopping decisions for her children and, often, her husband? E.g., both of my female cousins are married with kids - and its them who do the weekly food shop and keep up with what the kids need more of in terms of clothes and school equipment. So in that scenario, of course they're making the majority of spending decisions.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 07:13 AM
6

What on earth are you talking about. Are you saying that its okay for men to have tattoos but for women its a big no-no?
/r/MensRights05/02/22 01:37 PM
5

what topics did the lecture cover?
/r/MensRights25/10/21 01:43 PM
3

I agree that the Junior Inspector was being a prick, but surely thats reflective of real life? Not every character in a show will be a good or nice person, just as in the real world.
/r/MensRights26/08/21 06:24 PM
18

I haven’t seen anyone other than ellen herself claiming that this is somehow orchestrated or misogynistic. Everyone knows she’s just a complete arse and has spent the last decade treating her staff and her guests like shit - glad its finally come round to bite her.
/r/MensRights13/05/21 07:47 PM
2

Take Me Out is a UK show in which one man chooses between multiple (>20) women. As another commenter said, trashiness doesn't have limits!
/r/MensRights27/04/21 01:47 PM
3

Yeah I totally understand feeling overwhelmed by some of the more aggressive and targeted comments, its very frustrating not only on a personal level but because it totally shuts down the ability to have a reasonable, evidence-based discussion. Like you say though, most of those are trolls and we have to remember that these people will usually find a way to argue with anybody if they want to! Glad you're feeling better about it now!
/r/MensRights26/04/21 12:03 PM
1

I thought the comments were fairly balanced, in terms of agreement/disagreement with OP.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 10:05 AM
2

Thank you for taking the time to share all this - it seems there’s a lot I hadn’t heard of. The article about Queens being more likely to wage war than male rulers is particularly interesting. Definitely makes you realise how much we forget and ignore when we’re only interested in looking at things from one point of view.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 09:37 PM
3

Yeah fair play I suppose. I think I was just taken by surprise because it was my first time engaging with this sub and I've not experienced that kind of consistent downvoting anywhere else. I myself try not to downvote simply because I disagree with someone's opinion so its frustrating when you try and put forward what seems like a reasonable argument and are just constantly downvoted because people don't like it. (But I appreciate that that's a subjective opinion, I'm not necessarily complainin…
/r/MensRights23/04/21 04:04 PM
3

Where did I lie?
/r/MensRights23/04/21 12:57 PM
1

Could you give me some specific examples? I'm asking because I'm genuinely curious, I don't mean to be rude. It's just because I'm not aware of any historical instances in which women have systemically oppressed men. Again, not trying to be rude or say it didn't happen. Its just not something I know about.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 12:19 PM
2

Why are you posting this again here? This has no relevance to the current comment chain, which is talking about prevalence of downvoting in this sub.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 12:16 PM
-3

Well for example I replied to this comment yesterday where the user was claiming that CRUK only fund research into women's cancers. I commented explaining that according to the CRUK website this is untrue, and then went into more detail further down the chain with some sources and more explanation. My comments received downvotes (albeit not very many), while some of the others which didn't provide a great explanation/sources were upvoted. I appreciate that it's still possible to have a discussio…
/r/MensRights23/04/21 09:55 AM
-1

When you're just trying to have a discussion, yes its very frustrating to be downvoted for no apparent reason. How do people expect to get anywhere if they're not willing to present actual arguments and evidence and instead just downvote or insult others?
/r/MensRights23/04/21 08:59 AM
1

For sure - always happy to have a reasonable discussion! I was thinking about infectious diseases in general, which would have the potential to affect the general public, but yes I agree that it's not quite the same for STDs. I personally would still be happy for STD tests to be funded by taxation (I'm from the UK where we have the NHS anyway), but I appreciate that some people will have different views.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 08:21 AM
-4

I agree. I find it very disheartening, especially when I try and have a reasonable discussion but I'm instantly downvoted or attacked. I am 100% for equality across the sexes but some of the posts here make me worried about getting involved.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 08:02 AM
2

What kind of oppression are you talking about here?
/r/MensRights23/04/21 07:59 AM
3

But the point being made here is that certain services benefit not only the direct user, but the wider population too, and so it makes sense for them to be funded by taxes. In this instance, a public health intervention to stop the spread of STDs - or any infectious disease - helps not only those individuals that currently have the disease, but also those in the wider public who might come into contact with them in the future.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 07:55 AM
5

Hmm, that's true. Hadn't thought about it that way, fair point I suppose.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 06:58 PM
-1

Lying about being on birth control in order to get someone to have sex with you is obviously wrong; however I suppose it is slightly different from the current definition of "stealthing" because it doesn't carry an additional STI risk. I'm therefore not sure if it could be considered exactly the same as removing a condom from a legal perspective.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 05:12 PM
1

I appreciate you saying that you can't verify the article's truthfulness, as that's what I was concerned about. If you look here you can read CRUK's annual report, which breaks down how they spend the money raised. In terms of screening programmes, that's a different kettle of fish. Screening programmes have very strict guidelines they must meet in order to be brought into use - one being that that the test that is used must be "easy to perform and interpret, acceptable, accurate, reliable, sens…
/r/MensRights22/04/21 04:57 PM
0

Many of your points seem to be based on your own opinion rather than facts but I'll respond to your last sentence - if you wish to see how CRUK allocate their funds you can do so by looking at their annual report here
/r/MensRights22/04/21 04:41 PM
0

The Cancer Research UK website says here that the Race For Life "is a series of events raising money for research into all 200 types of cancer". Then if you look here you can read their report and see the full breakdown of the types of research they fund, which includes: bowel cancer, breast cancer, lung cancer, skin cancer, ovarian cancer, prostate cancer, blood cancers, and more. Some of those cancers affect only men and some affect only women - and most can affect anyone. They appear to alloc…
/r/MensRights22/04/21 04:26 PM
1

Cancer Research UK's main website says: "Cancer Research UK’s Race for Life is a series of events raising money for research into all 200 types of cancer" - not just women's cancers. Even the "male cancers runs" which you are talking about - the Run for Moore - were to raise money for bowel cancer, which affects both men and women. The charity is concerned with all types of cancers - not just those affecting women, and not just those affecting men either.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 04:11 PM
2

Surely this makes sense? From what I understand, even when women started to move into the workplace they were often still expected to take full responsibility for the household chores. While women doing 100% of household tasks is obviously fine when they're not working, it's not fair to expect them to still do so when they're also in employment. I don't think this article is saying that men should be taking on the majority of household tasks; I think its just saying that women often find it diff…
/r/MensRights22/04/21 03:54 PM
-1

Cancer Research UK fund research on all types of cancers, not just those affecting women.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 03:40 PM
0

I think Cancer Research were wrong to exclude men from the race for so long, but as far as I know the funds raised go towards research on all cancers, that's what the Cancer Research website says. Where are you reading otherwise?
/r/MensRights22/04/21 03:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter