TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

putsch80 Archive

View 2 posts and 434 comments by putsch80 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

My guess is they maybe suspect you are guilty, but don't have enough proof to arrest you or charge you. They want to talk to you to see if you will say something that can fit with other evidence they have to create probable cause to arrest you. I always suggest that you be polite to cops, but also refuse to answer their questions by explaining that you would prefer to have a lawyer present. Repeatedly ask them if you are under arrest or if you can go ahead and leave.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/16 02:37 PM
3

Exactly this. If you are in the U.S., the conversation should go something like this. Cop: Blah blah blah, what happened? You: With all due respect, officer, I'd rather not speak to the police without my lawyer present. Am I free to go? At this point, the cops have to make a choice. Either place you under a custodial arrest, at which point they must recite your Miranda rights and you just tell them that you will not be speaking to them without a lawyer. OR they will be forced to cut you loose. D…
/r/TheRedPill07/11/16 06:50 PM
10

Sure they will. Parole boards are notorious for believing that women are more capable of "reforming themselves" than men are. They will have no trouble paroling her.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/16 03:21 PM
26

The icing is she was only charged with second degree murder. She set out to kill this child not just once, but twice. It wasn't an accident. It was planned. That's fucking first degree murder and should result in the fucking gas chamber. Instead, she will be let out of prison before her now-dead baby would have been old enough to legally drink alcohol. Can anyone imagine a scenario where a man brutally murders his own child out of revenge towards a woman and doesn't end up getting the death pena…
/r/TheRedPill19/09/16 03:19 PM
7

I guarantee you it is not a place where you'd want to live.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/16 11:02 PM
37

The reason he won't treat you is similar to the reason that a lot of tattoo artists won't give you a tattoo on your face. They've encountered too many people who have changed their mind or regretted the choice, and they either don't want to deal with your bullshit, or have you badmouthing them for "doing that" to you, or getting sued. At the end of the day, you don't have a right to receive non-life sustaining medical treatment. If you are that deadset on getting a vasectomy, shop around until y…
/r/TheRedPill29/07/16 02:27 AM
11

Have you actually fucked a single one of these "hot friends" of hers? If not, then that pretty much tells you that your plan is shit and that you are, in fact, seen as an emotional tampon for the group. You know that little bin that is in the women's toilet stall for them to discard their used sanity products? They see you as the human equivalent of that.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/16 01:26 AM
89

I would ignore the shit show she is engaging in. I would just send her a simple text that says, "When you are ready to behave, come back over and show me how you can be better than those porn girls." No follow up beyond that. At that point, you've shown her you won't cave to her emotional bullshit, and given her a clear roadmap to get back in your good graces.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/16 11:39 PM
8

In California, rape still requires some measure of penile penetration into the vagina. Inserting something else (fingers, dildo, etc...) into the vagina cannot legally be rape in california. That is why the so-called "Stanford rapist" had all the rape charges against him dropped by the district attorney and was instead only convicted of sexual assault; since he only used his fingers on her, it could not be rape under California law.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/16 03:47 PM
1

Under the California penal code (sec. 261), rape is defined as "an act of sexual intercourse accomplished with a person not the spouse of the perpetrator" that meets any of several criteria. This has been interpreted to require genital to genital contract and some slight measure of penetration of the penis into the vagina. HOWEVER, it is not based on who does the penetrating; if a woman forcibly inserts a guy's dick into her, she has just raped him.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/16 03:45 PM
14

OP being 23 also makes a huge difference. Yes, you can put on muscle mass and make gains at any age, but it is soooo much easier in your late teens and early 20s.
/r/TheRedPill26/06/16 07:45 PM
3

You're the one who is literally advocating for no taxes or government. I pointed out a real life example of where that exists. That's not a straw man; it's a real life example of the exact thing you advocate. Maybe you need a refresher on what the term "strawman" means.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/16 03:56 PM
3

Yup. No taxes, infrastructure or functioning government has worked out pretty goddamn well for Somalia. We should totally emulate that.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/16 03:20 PM
6

You emphasize the "forced to obey" part of the definition of "slave," while completely glossing over the "legal property of another" part of the definition. They are conjunctive, so both parts must exist. Indeed, under your warped sense of bullshit, any system of law that compels people to obey its dictates is slavery. This is not only antithetical to an organized society (ya know, with rules of law and property protections) needed to have a path to individual prosperity, but it's also just a fl…
/r/TheRedPill24/06/16 03:18 PM
1

It depends on the state, but yes. Typically it just falls under a broad umbrella called sexual assault.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/16 04:26 PM
2

I think the "semantics" are necessary when we see so many people conflating a colloquial definition of "rape" for the legal definition of "rape". People get up in arms that a "rapist" was given such a light sentence. But, in the criminal context, he wasn't a rapist and so he should not be criminally sentenced like a rapist. But, because people have colloquially called him a rapist they don't realize that there is a disconnect between what they call rape and why the law calls rape. It's similar t…
/r/TheRedPill17/06/16 04:23 PM
1

OP: for formatting purposes, you have to put two line breaks between paragraphs. Otherwise, if you just do a single line break, Reddit's formatting doesn't recognize it and you just end up with one huge paragraph.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/16 04:15 PM
34

California defines "rape" in the same manner. In fact, the so-called "Stanford rapist" was not convicted of rape at all; all four counts on which he was convicted were for sexual assault. The prosecution originally charged him with two counts of rape, but they voluntarily dismissed those charges once the evidence showed there was no genital-to-genital contact. While some people will claim this whole thing is just semantics, it's not. People loosely throw around the word "rape" in situations like…
/r/TheRedPill16/06/16 02:39 PM
12

But my redpill mentally never turns off Bullshit. You either don't have that mentality, or you have never used it. If you did have a redpill mentality like you claim, you wouldn't have done all the stupid shit you mentioned before using that phrase in your story, including: Getting involved with a married girl who you know is crazy and attaches easily Moving her in with you Losing a good male friend because you disagreed with his (correct) advice about her Telling her you love her (which pretty …
/r/TheRedPill11/06/16 01:26 AM
39

One issue for most women is that they gague themselves by men. If I call a girl out for weighing 170, she will retort "well you weight 210!" What she fails to realize is that (1) I'm 6 or more inches taller than her, and (2) much more of my weight comes from muscle mass than fat, just by virtue of being male. But because she has been taught that men and women are equal, none of that plays in her mind.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/16 10:42 PM
10

If she seems into you, the have sex with her. Just be prepared to cut bait at the first sign of crazy. Make it clear you aren't looking for a relationship. And, for the love of God, if you haven't had a vasectomy make sure you are in charge of the birth control. Bring your own condoms. And either flush them or carry them out with you; do not throw the used rubbers in her trash can. The trap here sounds like she might be looking to latch onto some financial benefits since she is unable to secure …
/r/TheRedPill08/06/16 05:39 PM
5

Have you ever considered if the situations were reversed? Just prior to your child being born, she had decided to leave you, but due to her cancer, she didn't. What do you think would have happened if she had found out it was you who had cancer? Do you think she would have stuck around? Moved with you? Taken care of you? Made the money and kept the house? Stayed faithful? I very much doubt it. I understand you wanting to be there. I understand you trying to keep a family together so your boy can…
/r/MarriedRedPill03/06/16 09:12 PM
14

This is the life of any woman who's not morbidly obese or butt ass ugly True while they are young. Much less true as they get older. Sure, there are some women who look great into their 40s, but they are scarce and will virtually always pale in comparison to a similarly built woman who is 15-20 years younger. This is why a lot of women get really bitter in their 30s. That shit usually comes to a screeching halt. No more acting cute to get out of problems. No more attractive men fawning over you.…
/r/TheRedPill03/06/16 08:08 PM
5

Other than a rare few cases, this simply isn't true and is for inexplicable reasons a pervasive myth around here. The only thing I can figure is that, on the rare occasions a prenup is invalidated (for reasons that are not already crystal clear in the law, such as prohibitions against custody arrangements in prenups), it's such a newsworthy event that it gets picked up by the media and widely circulated. Bottom line is that if you have a prenup drafted by a competent attorney (no legal zoom bull…
/r/TheRedPill02/06/16 10:07 PM
5

Also to give her a cover of plausible deniability for agreeing to have sex right away. If her peer group is especially critical of the guy or her actions with him, she can also parlay her alleged drunkenness into a rape accusation.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/16 07:42 PM
4

Sweetie, nobody on this sub cares what you think. This is a male space, not a place for you to come and bitch about your problems with men. Head over to TwoX and peddle your problems there.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/16 02:50 AM
20

I'm an attorney, and can say with damn certainty that this man's story about being arrested for not paying his student loan is 100% bullshit. It absolutely reeks of shitty journalism that accepts someone's preposterous story at face value and performs no fact checking. What likely happened is that this man was arrested for failing to appear in court in response to a subpoena. Such subpoenas are commonly issued to force individuals to attend court and testify about what assets they have. If you d…
/r/TheRedPill17/02/16 12:26 AM
12

I find it kinda strange that she would give me her boyfriends number, then tell him that she gave his number to a guy at the gym. She used you to get a rise out of her boyfriend. You were just a prop. She wanted to get the emotional reaction from him and manipulate him. There was likely never any interest in you beyond that which she feigned to get you to call. Now, the real question is: you'll be seeing her at the gym again. How do you react to her?
/r/TheRedPill05/02/16 10:29 PM
2

Well, typically, the birth certificate is going to be issued in the state where the child is born (Arkansas), and so Arkansas law will adjudicate parentage and maternity. If you're really concerned, it'd be easy enough to file a friendly suit in Arkansas to get an official court order to that effect. I'd be hard pressed to see how a final adjudication on that matter in Arkansas wouldn't be barred by res judicata from being re-litigated in any other state.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/16 03:34 AM
9

Again, for anyone wanting to go the surrogacy route, please consider hiring an Arkansas surrogate. They have a law on the books (thanks to Bill Clinton) clarifying that a father can be the sole parent in a surrogacy situation. Ark. Code sec. 9-10-201: (c) (1) A child born by means of artificial insemination to a woman who is unmarried at the time of the birth of the child shall be, for all legal purposes, the child of the woman giving birth, except in the case of a surrogate mother, in which eve…
/r/TheRedPill01/02/16 07:59 PM
1

Don't play into her bullshit. No earlier than tomorrow afternoon, tell her to meet you somewhere. Does two things. First, it shows her you're not going to buy into the emotional bait. Second, it gets her hamster going that maybe you do like her more than her low self esteem wants to believe.
/r/askTRP31/01/16 04:00 AM
9

We all get it. You're angry. You didn't get the best lot in life. You didn't win the genetic lottery. Most guys (me included) didn't either. The real question is: what are you going to do about it? Are you going to whine like a little bitch? Spend hours trolling the internet looking for sympathy? Or would you rather direct those efforts into going to the gym and losing fat/building muscle? Would you rather spend it hanging out with your friends doing fun shit and learning how to be a more comple…
/r/TheRedPill21/01/16 10:48 PM
10

You really want to fuck with her in a way that cuts deep? Message back with this reply and nothing else: "Who is this?" This response does a couple things. First, it indicates that she wasn't memorable enough for you to even know who she is now. Second (if this is a Facebook or similar social media text where you can see pics of her), it implies her looks have changed (degraded) so much since you last saw her that she's unrecognizable. Third, it leads her to believe that you have enough women in…
/r/TheRedPill14/01/16 10:29 PM
3

Sounds like OP has better options than a divorced woman who has no other options in men. If I was a woman's last resort, I wouldn't want to fuck her. No telling what she will try to do since, she knows that if she loses me, that she truly has no other options.
/r/TheRedPill14/01/16 10:24 PM
59

You underestimate the shit show that could have happened if she'd try to swing branches (while pregnant) to OP. She could burn his career to the ground. OP made the right choice.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/16 09:08 PM
3

I'm not sure what your job/financial situation is (including things like health insurance), but I would stick the idea of trying to have sex with a customer under my "don't shit where you eat" category.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/16 03:46 PM
0

That sub was originally created as a troll sub to this. It's populated by apt of Two Xers.
/r/TheRedPill06/12/15 05:36 AM
3

Exactly. Responding and criticizing her just lets her think that there are things she can change (or tell you she will change) in order to make you like her. Paying her no attention--just total indifference to her comments and existence--will eventually cause her to move on.
/r/TheRedPill05/12/15 11:43 PM
34

It's not like long-term decision making or consequence analysis are the strong points of most single moms.
/r/TheRedPill05/12/15 03:30 AM
57

I think this guy's mind is already made up to end it with her. He just doesn't know it yet. Most people on this sub can attest that when your worldview of the "fairer sex" comes crashing down it can be one hell of a mindfuck and takes a while to navigate through. I think this guy is on that path but is having trouble of letting go of his vision of who he thought his wife does. As her belly grows with that other dude's child, it will become more and more clear to him.
/r/TheRedPill04/12/15 12:02 AM
3

It was done specifically for the purpose of cracking down on prank calls by radio stations. People were complaining to the FCC that they were being harassed. So, the FCC created this rule in response.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/15 02:29 AM
9

If this is in the U.S., it's a 100% fake/scripted bit that used actors. By law, a radio station must identify itself to a caller immediately (can't even wait to get consent to use the recording after the end of the bit). Literally every prank call and the like you hear on the radio where one of the DJ's poses as someone else is all fake and has been for about 10 years since the FCC introduced this rule. For reference, it's FCC rule 73.1206. It states: Before recording a telephone conversation fo…
/r/TheRedPill02/12/15 08:03 PM
31

Nothing would make me happier than to have one of these women take the stall next to me as I'm unloading about 24 oz of foul-smelling nuclear grade shit only inches from them. Come see what the men's restroom is all about, sweetie!
/r/TheRedPill26/11/15 08:15 PM
6

I thought it was another country since some cities have other official languages besides English. So what? New Mexico's state constitution is in Spanish. What's your point? Also illegal immigrants there have more rights then American citizens in many cases. Name any.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/15 07:20 PM
2

Im betting OP is more about getting free shit than he is about conveying some obtuse political message to Hollywood. And anyone can re-frame the question. I would argue it's far more noble to break laws to ensure yourself and your family a better, safer and more prosperous livelihood than it is to pilfer digital goods to save a few bucks and protest "dirty" movie theaters.
/r/TheRedPill28/09/15 08:56 PM
3

"Illegal immigration" consists of one of two things. Either: (i) entering the country illegally (unlawful entry), which is only a misdemeanor, or (ii) overstaying a lawful visit (unlawful presence), which is not even a crime. Willful copyright infringement, however, is typcially a felony, especially if you are a regular downloader (which I'm betting you are, given your expressed disdain for movie theaters). So, ya, you are right. But the fundamental difference is that you are a more serious crim…
/r/TheRedPill28/09/15 08:52 PM
25

I find it incredibly amusing that you spend your first paragraph justifying your illegal actions in stealing this movie, only to shit on immigrants for coming here illegally two paragraphs later.
/r/TheRedPill28/09/15 04:07 PM
6

what are the downsides of a asset-protection trust as far as taxes, inheritance, any risks with it, etc. go? Dont' you need somsone who you can trust since the trust can't be for you? Potential downsides include: The trust must usually be irrevocable and unchangeable, meaning that once the assets go in, you can't subsequently dissolve the trust, or really even change the terms of the trust instrument. You (the settlor, i.e., trust creator) cannot serve as both sole trustee and beneficiary. That …
/r/TheRedPill26/09/15 04:19 AM
23

The funny part is, in 5 years or so, as that wall is rapidly approaching, she will suddenly be wondering why men aren't paying much attention to her anymore.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/15 03:33 AM
14

OP, listen to this. I wouldn't even trust she's actually pregnant. Could be a ruse to get you comfortable with fucking her raw so that you can sire a baby for her.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/15 06:01 PM
16

However, adultery that has been condoned– conditionally forgiven –or is the result of connivance, does not act as a bar to an award of alimony. Be careful of the "forgiven" part. If you know your spouse has cheated, and then proceed to at some point have sex with them after you discover the cheating but before you are divorced, the law usually views this as a reconciliation and will likely have deemed you to have forgiven the cheater.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/15 01:34 PM
2

Not marriage tourism. Divorce tourism. The laws of the state you are married play no real role as in terms of what laws apply when you get divorced. Example: before "no fault" divorce became common, Nevada was about the only state that had it. And you only had to reside in Nevada a short time (like 4 weeks or something) before Nevada would allow you to file divorce in that state. So, a lot of people wanting to divorce without having to prove some kind of fault would "move" to Nevada by setting u…
/r/TheRedPill05/09/15 01:31 PM
27

Why do feminists assume that a "young and pretty" girl cannot also be intelligent and a "strong independent womyn"? What kind of sexist bullshit is it that these feminists assume that a woman must look like a hambeast or a pink-haired bulldyke in order to meet their approval of who a man can date?
/r/TheRedPill05/09/15 12:42 AM
1

Well, I can tell you that when some laws were written using masculine pronouns, women argued that the laws--which were clearly meant to apply to both genders--did not apply to them. I don't know what the success of those claims has been, but I do know that many states addressed this issue by passing a comprehensive law stating that use of masculine pronouns is meant to apply to both genders, unless the context of the statute clearly indicates otherwise.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/15 11:03 PM
-9

millions of Americans. Think you need to re-check your math on that one, chief. You lost me at the part about negro occupying the whitehouse. You sound like a bit of an irrational twat. Cheers.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/15 01:58 PM
22

His home country is the U.S. The U.S. cannot ban its own citizens for unpopular speech because the First Amendment prohibits that.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/15 01:21 PM
17

One of the truisms for many areas in the U.S. is that, as a man, you are expected to know how to use a gun. That doesn't mean that you have to like guns, or keep guns, or shoot guns. But it does mean that, if a gun is encountered (such as when staying at someone else's house, cleaning out a family member's home after a death, etc...), a woman will likely look to you as the man to properly handle it and ensure that it does not pose a threat to her or your children. In order to do this, you should…
/r/TheRedPill26/08/15 09:18 PM
21

Under U.S. law, all able-bodied men age 17 (not 18) up to age 45 are automatically part of the militia. This is independent of the requirement to register for the Selective Service (aka the Draft). 10 U.S.C. 311.
/r/TheRedPill26/08/15 09:11 PM
18

As a general rule, the "single mom" mantra used around here does not include widows. Women who are widowed generally did not become that way by choice, and are not viewed as having the character infirmities of women who bear children out of wedlock or who lose their man in a divorce.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/15 01:46 AM
11

No. The difference is that this woman will have sex, she just won't have it with OP. That speaks volumes about how she views him.
/r/TheRedPill18/08/15 06:08 PM
77

If you've only been together 8 months and she's not fucking you regularly, you need to move on. Marriage will dry her up completely. On top of that, the crazy ones are stereotypically cock hungry and good lays. She doesn't even provide that benefit.
/r/TheRedPill18/08/15 04:18 AM
3

Do not give her the video. Do not share it with her. You are setting yourself up for legal problems if shit ever goes crazy with her.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/15 08:34 PM
6

The one in New York carries a penalty of being placed on the sex offender registry. I'd call that a pretty fucking huge penalty. Violation of the law is also a felony. See how easy your life in the world is as a registered sex offender and convicted felon. It pretty much prevents you from getting a decent job and prevents you from living in desirable places.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/15 08:30 PM
7

No, there is apparently more than one Stephanie's Law. The one in New York directly bears on taping a sex act without consent. If convicted, you are placed on the sex offender registry.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/15 08:29 PM
2

They have not been removed. I know in January 2015 (after losing control of the senate) the dems filibustered a measure on the Keystone pipeline.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/15 08:20 PM
1

You are correct. My old civics teacher would be disappointed.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/15 08:19 PM
14

Don't count on it. Special interests, even small ones, routinely get preferential treatment in the legislative process. All they need is one or two senators on their side and that can effectively derail the bill for good. And never underestimate the fact that women, who make up half the electorate, will be pandered to and portrayed as victims by opponents of this bill. The idea of a broad coalition of support on any gender issue that is portrayed as negative to women simply isn't going to happen…
/r/TheRedPill12/08/15 07:44 PM
9

Doesn't matter which party has a majority unless they have a filibuster proof majority. Otherwise, a democrat can just "filibuster" by just simply invoking the rules. They don't even have to stand on the floor and do that Jimmy Stewart 24-hour marathon speech thing to do one. They essentially just put a hold on the bill, and the bill never sees the light of day again unless the Senate invokes cloture for that bill by a 2/3 majority.
/r/TheRedPill12/08/15 07:41 PM
7

You can tell it's a TRP troll post by this passage: I was a free spirit in college before I figured out what I wanted to do and took a year off to travel before graduating. That was a very fun year, sexually speaking. I made a lot of mistakes, of course, but I was getting valuable experience and learning a lot about myself.
/r/TheRedPill12/08/15 07:36 PM
47

Would love to see this get traction, but even if it makes it through the House it will die a quiet, unceremonious death in the Senate via some anonymous legislative hold.
/r/TheRedPill12/08/15 07:21 PM
5

I think it would be implicit within the rule that it's referring to women who are sexually active. And, in any event, the rule still applies. If you are waiting around to bone a virgin, then you're doing it wrong. Her virginity might be an important aspect in your choice to marry her, but the sex with her won't be worth the wait. It won't be much different or better than any of the other 3.5 billion vaginas on the planet.
/r/TheRedPill12/08/15 02:21 AM
17

But but but that might discourage some woman from coming forward. It's better to throw 1000 innocent men in jail than to let one rapier to free! /s
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 09:02 PM
2

I cannot say that any haven't been thrown out. There may have been some executed under duress, where full disclosures were not made, etc. However, the fact that this issue about the prenup getting thrown out made the news should speak a lot about what a rarity it is for that to happen. I will also note that the New York Appellate Division (2nd Dept.), which is the same court that made the ruling that this story is about, has ruled as recently as June and October 2014 (after the case in the story…
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 04:24 PM
2

What's to stop a woman from crying duress 30 days before the wedding? Because duress generally requires that a party be left with no reasonable alternative but to do something. The longer the period you have to act, the more likely it is that you have other reasonable alternatives. For example, canceling a wedding and getting at least a partial refund on some of the items (especially shit like cake, flowers, catering, etc) is much easier a month or two out than it is on the eve of the wedding.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 04:15 PM
29

Weddings tend to bring out the worst in women. For the unmarried ones, it's a reminder that they still haven't found a man to legally commit to them and take care of them. For women who are post-wall, this is especially bitter, as they know that the young, pretty girl walking down the aisle secured a man with a higher SMV than they could probably get for themselves at this point in their lives. For the married ones, it creates jealousy. Sometimes it's in the form of "she got a better man than I …
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 04:54 AM
11

They may have. They may have told this guy, "don't rely on this prenup if she doesn't sign it at least a month before the wedding". This guy may not have told his lawyers that she had been refusing to sign it. Love makes people do stupid shit.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 06:58 PM
29

I'm one of those lawyers who usually chimes in on this stuff about prenups. I only had to read a few paragraphs of the story to tell exactly where and how he fucked up. It's right here: She originally refused to sign it, but a few days before her wedding, she agreed to sign after her husband promised her he would do away with the prenup once the two began to have children. When he didn't have that prenup in hand at least 60 days before the wedding, he should have called the wedding off. By allow…
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 06:45 PM
1

It exists in the same way freemasonry exists. It is something real, but it is not the dangerous imaginary thing that conspiracy fuckwits pretend it is. The fact it was even brought up by you as part of a conversation about eugenics (which, again, had nothing to do with my original post) told me that any conversation about it with you would be filled with of your delusional rantings spawned by your gullible idiocy.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 03:55 PM
1

How about Agenda 21 by the United Nations? Or for that matter, Brave New World. Or the Georgia Guidestones. Ah. I get it now. You're actually retarded. I don't mean that as a pejorative. I mean anyone who believes in this nonsense is literally down-syndrome level retarded.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 12:44 AM
2

You need to learn what eugenics is. It's a big word with a lot of syllables, so I can see why you are confused. I'm not advocating the selective extermination of breeding of particular traits in order to enhance desirable traits in the population. I'm saying there's too fucking many people for the resources we have. My views may be Malthusian, but they sure as fuck aren't based in eugenics.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/15 10:45 PM
5

In what possible way was Fiorina looking "impressive"? She has no governing experience. She fucked HP up and was fired for doing a shit job. She has never won an election. What in the hell makes anyone think this woman could run a fucking country in a manner that even resembles competency?
/r/TheRedPill08/08/15 04:51 PM
5

I would argue the opposite, and that the decline of marriage and birthrates is good. We've already got too fucking many people on this planet. We need to thin the herd. Typically, wars and plague have done that in the past. A declining birthrate gets the job done just as well and without the mess of having to kill a shitload of people to do it. Does it mean a major economic shift? Absolutely. But the result will be the same when there are 10 billion on the planet without enough food, water or re…
/r/TheRedPill07/08/15 11:55 PM
5

Exactly. Find me a predominately Islamic country that isn't a third world shithole or rapidly turning into one. Turkey is the closest thing I can think of to one, as it had the benefit of being primarily secular. Now that religion is once again sneaking into Turkish government, we are watching them slide to another shitbox Islamic state.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/15 11:53 PM
5

Tampons are more pricey because they are a "luxury" item. Even among tampon brands, some are way better than others, and you pay for quality. Pads are cheap. Like, $0.25 or less per pad. It's just that most women prefer a tampon to a pad for comfort reasons. [source: my wife]. As for condoms, the free ones are usually shit. They are fine for preventing pregnancy and STDs, but they feel like you duck taped an old balloon to your cock. If you want one that feels even halfway decent, you pay more f…
/r/TheRedPill05/08/15 07:43 PM
13

As soon as these ladies have to start wearing long sleeves and a wool suit to work in July, then they can have an opinion. If they are choosing to wear a short sleeve blouse and a shorter-than-knee-length skirt in order to look cute, then they don't get to have an opinion on temperature.
/r/TheRedPill03/08/15 11:45 PM
13

I will put it in a jar on my dresser for her each week. She can collect it whenever she's ready.
/r/TheRedPill03/08/15 10:17 PM
20

Frankly, I think Mars One would be the ultimate way to get a hassle-free divorce. Once she's in space, file the divorce. You'd never even have to face the bitter harpy. She wouldn't have a lawyer. You wouldn't have to pay alimony or child support (where would she even spend it). And there is literally no chance she could ever come back and try to fuck you over. It is truly the only way to be free of an ex wife that doesn't involve murder. I know it's in vain, but part of me hopes these guys are …
/r/TheRedPill03/08/15 08:31 PM
159

If Disney is smart, they will create a subsidiary studio that just churns out an endless supply of these type of fairytales about post-wall CC riders finding the man of their dreams and living happily ever after. Disney could then feed women this bullshit from cradle to menopause.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/15 07:36 PM
159

This is just another version of 50 Shades of Gray. It's mental masturbation material for women, playing off the idea that somehow the alpha men they want to fuck are actually beta teddy bears and even mediocre looking women can control them with sex. In fact, it's so ludicrous it (the concept) actually is funny.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/15 08:26 PM
3

I think it has more to do with the way each gender is taught how to have effective communication. And not just verbal communication, but non-verbal and subtextual as well. For men, acting cute and helpless is a very ineffective communication strategy. It is perceived as weak, and makes the man appear to be, well, not a man. Thus, in order to communicate effectively, men have to take a typically masculine approach: direct statements, eye contact, solid posture, logic, and some wit. As far as thin…
/r/TheRedPill01/08/15 03:01 PM
8

Just leave. It's a restaurant job. There are nearly an infinite amount of those to be had. Many will be in far better work environments. Find another job first. Once you do, give your current job 2 weeks notice. Once you give that notice, resolve not to stay there even if they offer you a better position or a raise. They could (should) have done that while they had your loyalty as an employee, not when they were about to lose it.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/15 12:16 AM
6

I'm aware that both Amherst and Columbia are private. Many of these kangaroo courts have been at public institutions (or at least at institutions with enough public control to qualify as "state actors" for sec. 1983 purposes). The point is that there can and eventually will be financial consequences to this.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/15 11:15 PM
204

At some point, someone in the U.S. is going to remember that there is still due process guaranteed under our constitution, and these universities are going to find themselves on the receiving end of a pretty harsh financial fucking in lawsuits brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for deprivation of rights under color of law.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/15 08:07 PM
15

Hell, she has already been banging Chad for years. She probably fucked him this morning before coming over to your house to eat the nice breakfast you made her.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/15 06:18 PM
6

Exactly. Self improvement can be a slow motherfucker. Eating right, lifting, cutting out friends who are draining, getting your finances in order, dressing better, reading.... doing all of these things right and often is a major lifestyle change. Add to it the attitude changes that come with having to overcome approach anxiety and building a frame that is worth maintaining, and most people don't have the patience or internal drive to follow the path very far. Instead, many new TRPers come here a…
/r/TheRedPill30/07/15 03:58 PM
2

There are virtually no marital tax benefits that offset the fucking you take on US income tax as a high-earning married couple compared to an unmarried cohabitating couple.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/15 07:44 PM
2

Just have a kid without a legal mother. Seriously. Some states have laws allowing this (Arkansas jumps to mind). Use your sperm to fertilize a few donor eggs via IVF. You can have the resulting embryos screened for gender (if you want a boy or girl). Hire a surrogate to carry the embryo to term. When the child is born, only your name goes on the birth certificate; there is no woman with any legal right or claim to the child. It's not what a lot of guys have in mind, and that's fine. But it's imp…
/r/TheRedPill28/07/15 07:41 PM
6

Look into a sous vide cooker and get a vacuum sealer for food. Sous vide cooks the vacuum packed food at a fairly low temperature in water over several hours. No exposed heating surfaces. It makes the best and moistest chicken I've ever cooked. You can also cook a shitload of it at once (like 7 or 8 lbs), then pop it out of the water and stick it in the fridge. It's already vacuum packed so it keeps fresh for quite a while. Then just pop one open when you are ready to eat. Sous vide steak is als…
/r/TheRedPill28/07/15 06:37 PM
8

Here are some things that your pre-nup cannot have: Clauses dealing with child support. Clauses dealing with custody. Here are some things your pre-nup can have. Clauses dealing with eliminating alimony Clauses dealing with property division upon divorce. Clauses dealing with keeping separate ownership of pre-marital assets. Clauses that only spring into effect upon proving infidelity (e.g., she does get alimony if there is no infidelity, but does not get alimony if there was infidelity). Other …
/r/TheRedPill27/07/15 10:44 PM
0

If you expect her to continue to offer herself up like that after she has legally secured your financial support to her via marriage, you're fucking kidding yourself. She is doing that now to keep you strung along until you say your vows. After that, it will absolutely dry up.
/r/MarriedRedPill25/07/15 12:54 AM
4

Exactly this. Losing a few thousand dollars in wedding deposits is a drop in the proverbial bucket compared to what you will be paying in a divorce.
/r/MarriedRedPill25/07/15 12:50 AM
1

Just wanted to illuminate one point that is interesting from an historical and legal perspective. Women love the phrase "to have and to hold". It just sounds so romantic! Unfortunately, it is anything but. The phrase "to have and to hold" connotes the transfer of a property interest. It is why the phrase commonly appears in deeds transferring real property. This phrase is a leftover remnant of wedding vows when the woman was literally chattel that her to-be husband was acquiring via marriage. By…
/r/MarriedRedPill23/07/15 07:29 PM
17

Yup. I vividly remember watching it as an early teenager. That's how mainstream rave culture was by that point.
/r/TheRedPill23/07/15 03:54 PM
27

Saved by the Bell: The College Years had characters that went to a rave and did nitrous. This was on prime time network TV in 1994. Not exactly "underground" counterculture at that point.
/r/TheRedPill23/07/15 03:04 PM
10

Most of the world doesn't give a shit how you want to define the genre. OP is clearly talking about electronic music. Whether that's what you want to call EDM, or techno, or some other variant of a DJ using s computer to generate synchopated rhythms for people to dance to is utterly immaterial to his story. OP was talking about a chick going to raves and all night parties where she did drugs and fucked. Given what we know about CC riders, does that seem at a like a stretch?
/r/TheRedPill23/07/15 03:02 PM
0

I don't understand why this paternalistic attitude would pervade the medical establishment for vasectomies, but not abortions. Yes, I get that in the U.S. abortion is a legal right. But that doesn't mean doctors have to agree to perform any abortions at all, let alone one on a 16 year old. It seems very arbitrary to give women the ability over their reproductive rights, but not men. I also think there is an extreme difference between tubal ligation and vasectomies due to the fact that women have…
/r/TheRedPill22/07/15 12:41 PM
46

True. But you will usually have to look a lot harder to find a doc who will do it. Many doctors won't perform one on men in their 20s unless those men have already had a kid or two. I've even heard of some doctors who won't perform one at all on married men without written consent from the wife. Because, while feminism has deeply ingrained the idea into society that it's "her body, her choice," that same slogan doesn't apply to men.
/r/TheRedPill22/07/15 04:10 AM
19

"Freedom lies in being bold." -Robert Frost
/r/TheRedPill20/07/15 11:54 PM
3

To clarify: this ruling isn't about children born when a woman cheats. This case deals with the biological child of a man from whom the woman seeks child support. Just wanted to make sure everyone was clear about what the issue is for discussion purposes.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/15 10:27 PM
41

There's was a guy on Craigslist who told a story similar to this. He had a vasectomy and never told his LTR. Low and behold, she ends up pregnant (she was cheating and fucked the drummer in some band). He plays along for awhile before telling her and leaving her. https://archive.is/Rzyw7
/r/TheRedPill20/07/15 06:58 PM
107

If you read every 17th letter, it says: D-a-u-g-h-t-e-r-I-s-A-C-u-n-t-W-i-f-e-s-A-B-i-t-c-h-S-e-n-d-R-e-s-c-u-e.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/15 06:54 PM
2

My guess is because it serves as an echo chamber to re-enforce their beliefs that their behavior and attitude is ok. What woman with a bad body image, a promiscuous past, and an inferiority complex wouldn't want to find a magical place that says that all of those things are perfectly fine, and that it should be society (not themselves) that has to change to accept that kind of behavior?
/r/TheRedPill20/07/15 02:13 PM
3

Or the lack of challenge with nailing sluts is probably the easiest answer. If you're a kickass baseball player, you aren't going to get much enjoyment by showing up at a little league game and just destroying those kids over 9 innings. There's no challenge to it. It's not even sporting. I think OP was experiencing something similar. Just getting his dick wet is playing the game, but it doesn't mean that it's as enjoyable as it would be if he had to actually work at it.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/15 02:41 AM
4

I've explained to women on multiple occasions that "cute" is not a compliment for men. Women never really seem to understand this, so I've found it effective to tell them that it's equivalent to a man calling a woman "handsome." It's certainly not an insult to a woman, but a handsome woman tends to conjure up the idea of what you would call a "distinguished" (i.e., wayyyyy post-wall) woman of some refinement, not a sexy 20-something. That at least seems to help a light flick on in their head. Ed…
/r/TheRedPill19/07/15 07:08 PM
48

Keep in mind that, if you only read subs like that, you will only see women like that. AskWomyn tends to attract a certain kind of userbase that is largely homogenous: "sex-positive," pro-feminist, 20-30 somethings. If you interact with women in real life, you will certainly still encounter those kind of women, but you will also encounter plenty that have n-counts that you could count on one hand without a thumb.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/15 03:48 PM
12

Did you just try to compare paternity fraud to having an extra mortgage bill randomly start showing up? No. I'm comparing one fraud to another. Just because one form of fraud involves a child doesn't somehow make it special. They all entail trying to falsely place a tremendous financial burden on a person. You're an EC. I'm surprised that took any level of explaining for you. "Paternity fraud is like having a bill for a mortgage just randomly show up and so you pay it. See? This is why men who g…
/r/TheRedPill18/07/15 07:08 PM
34

I am a lawyer. I'm not going to comment on your first-half of the post, but wanted to chime in on the second have. Mothers can use paternity testing as evidence in court to win child support. Fathers cannot use paternity testing as evidence to deny child support (when child is older than 2, or if the man signed the birth certificate). In the U.S., each state's laws are different regarding how long you have to challenge paternity. Some states are two years. Some are 1 year. Some are even longer. …
/r/TheRedPill18/07/15 06:33 PM
10

On a side note, I'd love a woman to take me into her friend's bedroom and suck me off but something tells me I wouldn't be able to write that into a HuffPost article. Of course not. That's "patriarchy" because it's openly putting your own needs and desires ahead of a woman's.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/15 04:12 PM
6

I am a lawyer. In must jurisdictions, you can only convert personal property, not real property. Also, conversion is not a crime in most jurisdictions; rather, it's a civil tort. You can recover damages for the converted property, but not have the convertor prosecuted.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/15 12:12 PM
2

Depending on where you live, this may or may not be an issue. In some states, the car would be the joint property of the couple, regardless of the name it was titled in. In other states, it would remain separate property. The dealership fucked up though by not confirming the sale with the person whose name the car was titled in. My guess is they just saw the woman trying to sell the car had the same last name as the person on the title, and took her word that she was his wife. However, that woma…
/r/TheRedPill17/07/15 04:36 PM
2

This is debated, as flat front is certainly most popular right now. But from what I've read and seen, in certain environments (especially where a more conservative style of suit is proper, such as legal or financial), a single, reverse pleat is still very common and often more acceptable. If you are going out in a suit though, I would say flat front is probably better.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/15 01:25 PM
8

Here is my experience based on wearing a suit nearly everyday for years in a professional environment. If you're looking for a suit to go clubbing in, then what you want might be different, but most of this will still apply. FIRST: Basic things to consider. What color do you want? For most instances, a navy or charcoal suit will be proper, and those colors match nearly everything. How is your build? If you are slight of frame, consider getting a slim fitting suit. Pleats or flat front? Pleats te…
/r/TheRedPill17/07/15 01:14 AM
1

On the girl front, you probably need to step back and spend time working on yourself. How is your physique? Your posture? Your weight? Your style? These are all things that matter. Instead of doing approaches to get laid, maybe work on some day game where you just do approaches to have fun. Feel what it's like and what you need to do to approach women randomly and get them engaged and interested in you without the worry of trying to fuck them.. Removing that factor should make it easier to appro…
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 07:10 PM
6

So, by me asking you to explain your position instead of just allowing you to make ad hominem attacks, somehow I'm a bigot? Are you really that fucking stupid? Or do you just not know how to construct a logical argument? As of now, I'm leaning towards the former.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 05:26 AM
8

Then enlighten us instead of whining like a little bitch.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 05:12 AM
51

Email is dated July 14, 2015. Who wants to take an over/under that, despite all the hard work and emotional investment that the author has put into Julia over the years, Alex will be fucking Julia raw before August 1?
/r/TheRedPill15/07/15 10:13 PM
18

Another "sky is falling for TRP" post. We literally go through this exact same shit every month or two. Also, Wong (the guy who posted the statement OP is discussing) is not the "new, new Reddit CEO." Wong is a former CEO of reddit (pre-Pao). Steve Huffman is the current CEO of reddit who replaced Pao. Bottom line with this one: One ex-CEO (Wong) claims he knows what another ex-CEO (Pao) was thinking and what Pao wanted to do with regard to banning subs. In all likelihood, Wong doesn't know shit…
/r/TheRedPill15/07/15 04:04 PM
5

So, your mother has no use to you or anyone outside of her cunt?
/r/TheRedPill14/07/15 08:53 PM
7

I think the point is that it does change you, but that change is not irreversible. A sizeable number of men on this sub spent their teens and early 20s (or beyond) as friendzoned incels. In these situations though, the men have the power to change themselves to escape those situations. A lot of men look back on their bluegill ways and think, "I'm damn glad I'm not like that anymore." With the slut zone though, once a woman is in it, she's in it. She can't unfuck a cock. The best she can ever hop…
/r/TheRedPill14/07/15 04:56 PM
13

Because you don't want that dude polluting your family's gene pool? Because her spawn will suck up resources from OP's parents and take a piece of the inheritance? Because you don't want to listen to their bullshit at family gatherings or have to deal with their dimwitted kids at Christmas? Better you save the guy and keep her from spawning at all.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/15 08:51 PM
5

I tell everyone I know that is getting married (men and women) about getting a prenup, why they each need to use a qualified attorney to represent them (separately) in drafting it, and why it's important to have one. It just makes so much fucking sense that I am stunned it's not a legal requirement to have one in place in order to get married.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/15 08:49 PM
98

A more interesting question arises from all this. In 8-10 years, your sister will be running hard into the wall. At some point, she will probably show up to your house with her BB fiancé (who she rarely fucks). This BB will have stars in his eyes and think she's the greatest. Sure, she's told him she's not very sexual, which is why she only puts out every other week, but he loves her and can look past that. When this happens, what will you do? Will you enlighten him about her n-count? Will you t…
/r/TheRedPill13/07/15 06:31 PM
2

I subscribe to some of the local subs for my city/state. It's a good way to stay informed about what is going on.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/15 03:11 PM
10

I'm a little confused by the following: After passing her shit tests, the sex returned and finally she stopped criticizing and is really proud of her husband. -and- My girlfriend is in love with me like than we first met, and she was never been prouder of her boyfriend. Are you married? In an LTR? Did you get married while the sex well was dry?
/r/MarriedRedPill12/07/15 11:59 PM
3

Friend, you have got to learn how to use paragraphs. I'm not saying this to be a dick. I'm saying this because nobody is going to read that wall of unseparated text. Just puking out line after line of text with no structure or separation is what women do when whining on tumblr. You are a man. Learn to write like one.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/15 03:19 AM
20

Have you ever even ridden in a car with a baby in the back? It's a huge fucking pain in the ass. The person in the front passenger seat having to deal with the baby must unbuckle (which is unsafe) and struggle uncomfortably to deal with the child that is behind them. This Volvo setup actually makes a ton of sense. I think you are reaching for something to be offended at here, and in my opinion it's not necessary. Also note that in the ad, the man is driving and the woman is in the position of be…
/r/TheRedPill08/07/15 10:36 PM
2

Agreed. There have been several posts on here over time that distinguish between single moms and widows, including arguments as to why widows are an exception to the "don't LTR single moms" rule.
/r/TheRedPill08/07/15 01:44 PM
3

Careful on that. Putting on some bulk is good, but you don't want it to be very much fat. The max amount of muscle most people can put on is about 0.5 lbs/week. You are putting on that much per day. Odds are most of that weight is going to be fat, not muscle.
/r/TheRedPill08/07/15 12:37 AM
1

For me, the answer is generally, no, it is not ethical for a man to cheat. If you want the type of relationship where you get to fuck around on your wife or SO, that's fine, but own it. Either make it clear to her that you are going to be non-exclusive sexually, or end the relationship. If you tell someone you are going to be exclusive/faithful, then live up to your word. The major exceptions to this general rule in my mind are: (1) When a wife just totally shuts down sexually, her husband is ju…
/r/TheRedPill07/07/15 03:45 PM
5

This post isn't even close to comporting with the rules for the sub. Take it over to AskTRP.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/15 06:18 AM
2

I see two defects in your analysis: 1). If California makes those changes, under your scenario it would require action by California's legislature. Those legislative actions are independent of gay marriage. The worry by most people saying that gay marriage will lead to courts allowing polygamy is that the gay marriage decision somehow creates precedent that will require courts to rule that polygamy must be legal. From my reading of the Supreme Court's ruling on gay marriage, as well as the opini…
/r/TheRedPill07/07/15 04:06 AM
4

That still fails to recognize the fundamental point of my post: there is no equal protection claim to be made on polygamy like there was on gay marriage. Without an equal protection claim (which creates a violation of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. constitution), there is no legal basis to challenge the unconstitutionality of anti-polygamy laws.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/15 07:56 PM
4

In the U.S., no, legalizing gay marriage will not lead to polygamy (at least, not because of any judicial decisions). We can argue about what constitutes a "traditional" marriage, but the bottom line is that, in the US, traditional marriage has always been limited to a state-recognized contract between two individuals of legal age to consent to such a contract. While for all of US history until recently this contractual union was confined to a man and a woman, it has always been limited to 2 peo…
/r/TheRedPill06/07/15 07:18 PM
7

I've been browsing that data in the GSS (which the "StatisticsBrain" link claims it is using), and cannot find fuck-all for a dataset that backs up any of the infidelity statistics. This "statistic" seems to be without any actual scientific support, which makes it about as useful as feminist data on campus rapes and wage disparity: it fits a narrative, but is not actually backed up by anything of substance.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/15 07:52 PM
10

Also, OP, don't ever use the term "real man." You sound like a 35 year old single mom/former CC rider.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/15 12:39 AM
143

"I degraded myself to an alpha, and this girl is doing the same, and I can relate to her feeling bad, and that makes you at fault!" Women's logic 101. This isn't just the logic of the commenters. I'd guarantee you her mom was a CC rider, got alpha widowed (probably several times), and had to settle marrying some poor schlub because she rode the carousel right into the wall. The mom's phone call, while irrational, is somewhat understandable. She's just trying to prevent her daughter from making t…
/r/TheRedPill02/07/15 03:30 PM
5

Yup. If you're expecting a quick answer and instant solution, you won't find one (at least, not here). The philosophy of this sub, and the red pill generally, requires a lot of work focused on improving yourself, being a leader in your marriage, and focusing on your own happiness. As you do these things, the sex naturally follows. Fix yourself -- it's the only thing you can control. Once you do that, your wife's attraction to you increases, as does the attraction of other women. Between her newf…
/r/MarriedRedPill01/07/15 10:53 PM
4

I'm pretty certain you are just pulling numbers out of your ass here, mate.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/15 02:34 PM
2

If you're still busted up about someone wronging you decades before, that's a problem. You're not moving forward in life and allowing someone else to dictate a part of your mindset for decades. It's not about energy expenditure; it's about letting someone else have that much control over you for that long.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/15 03:39 AM
10

If you're an 80 year old man, and still mad and seeking revenge over someone who fucked you over in your 20s, you've pretty much fucked up at life and have failed to live it to the fullest. Short of someone murdering a loved one, there is very, very little that should care a grudge for more than a relatively brief time (relative to the human life scale).
/r/TheRedPill01/07/15 01:53 AM
1

Try re-posting in /asktrp. This is not the appropriate sub for this question.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/15 01:50 AM
11

Getting banned from that sub is kind of a badge of honor. If you get banned from offmychest and askhamster, you'll have completed the TRP trifecta.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/15 06:39 PM
2

This will depend on several things, including how much fat you had, where it is located (evenly spread throughout body or all collected in a beer gut or bitch tits), and how old you are (skin gets less elastic as you age, so a 20 year olds' skin is more likely to tighten than a 35 year olds' skin).
/r/TheRedPill29/06/15 03:17 PM
7

The second question is easy. She thought the drug dealer was more alpha. How she met the dealer, whether she did drugs, etc... doesn't really matter. The reason she swung branches is because the dealer (who does illegal shit, dabbles in a dangerous life, is probably unpredictable, likely has at least the faux respect of his customers, and maybe had tattoos, big muscles or other alpha traits) gave this girl the tingle more than the top commenter did. After that, she was on the carousel and figure…
/r/TheRedPill25/06/15 06:58 PM
32

Or she could claim that he beat her if he stuck around. Better to have her break/steal possessions than to have her lie to the cops and press charges for domestic violence.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/15 01:00 AM
2

The sad truth is that some women just will never not be complacent. Athol Kay says as much at the beginning of MMSLP, basically to the effect of, "I can't guarantee that following the advice in this book will work on the woman in your relationship, but if it doesn't, it will work on plenty of other women out there."
/r/MarriedRedPill24/06/15 09:23 PM
5

No, do not tell her you are going to start sleeping with other women. For starters, that is going nuclear before properly preceding through the prior stages of dread. If anything, you need to more subtlety telegraph that you could be sleeping with other women. Let her hamster take it from here. Also appropriate would be withdrawing your attention and affection if she isn't acting properly. Your birthday was a perfect example. She was delaying shit all night because, frankly, she didn't want to b…
/r/MarriedRedPill24/06/15 09:19 PM
-4

Divorce rape, while common, is far from universal. Especially if the BB is smart enough to have a competent lawyer craft a prenup, divorce rape is extremely unlikely. A fair property division can be bargained for and alimony can be waived. Beyond child support and custody issues, there is little room for a raping.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 06:04 PM
7

Hell, my revenge fantasy is that she does find her beta bucks. Knowing that she will have security but no true happiness or sexual satisfaction (without putting that security at risk) is revenge enough.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 05:12 PM
8

What happened? Some clipped Hebrew steal the girl you've got oneitis for?
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 03:53 PM
38

You will never, and I mean never see mandatory paternity testing. It's not in the interest of any state government to have that done. From the state's perspective, it serves to potentially break up families and cost states more in welfare dollars (not to mention all the newly-single moms that will appear after the husband realizes he isn't the bio dad, thereby creating a lot more fucked up kids that will drain even more tax dollars). And testing really provides the state with no tangible benefit…
/r/TheRedPill20/06/15 03:02 AM
1

Hit some of the external stuff linked on the side bar as well. Rollo's TheRationalMale website, as well as the two books he's written, are particularly enlightening and easy reads.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/15 02:20 AM
48

Her vagina would look more battered then rocky. Maybe she's into anal. Brown eye of the tiger.
/r/TheRedPill09/06/15 04:12 AM
112

I understand the desire for revenge, but you are wasting a lot of time and effort on this. Put that effort into bettering yourself. A woman can always find new orbiters with the lure of free pussy, so your efforts to "ruin" her will be short lived. Living well is the best revenge here. Improve yourself so when she looks at you or hears about you, she knows she fucked up. And don't give a shit that she feels that way (or about her at all).
/r/TheRedPill06/06/15 03:54 AM
4

This has to be fake. It would be virtually impossible to re-do a kitchen on that scale in only a week. It would be impossible to get contractors lined up to do it that quickly. Even if the guy did it himself, I still call bullshit because there is not $60,000 in materials there (since he would have only minimal labor costs). Edit: The "cut to my own confused face" thing at the end seals that this is a fake, along with the feigned outrage of the other participants that only start calling her a bi…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/15 08:37 PM
8

I'm a lawyer. I can tell you with 100% confidence that no court in the United States would enforce some of the provisions of this contract. The courts don't care what you call your contract, be it a prenup or a "live sperm donor" contract. A court will look at the effect of the contract's provisions. Particularly, in #5, you state: if either party cheats or abstains from regular sexual relations, the cheater/abstainer not only looses all rights in the contract and to child custody, but looses th…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/15 08:28 PM
8

The entitlement attitude she embodies is the epitome of why many men generally eschew white women for anything other than fucking. The irony is that, despite her self-professed intelligence and enlightenment, she will never understand that her own attitude is the root of her failure with men.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/15 06:24 PM
12

Whenever I the UNNECESSARY capitalization of CERTAIN words in an article like THIS one, then I know pretty much IMMEDIATELY that it was authored by an IDIOT.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/15 12:03 PM
11

Will this be in the usual AMA subreddit, or one of the other ones? My concern is the usual AMA subreddit is filled with so much bullshit on a typical day that, by the time you throw in the inevitable feminist brigading against Karen, there may not be any worthwhile discussion coming from the postings.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 05:11 AM
1

This has little to nothing to do with women, and everything to do with incompetent management. Nothing about her (from what you've described at least) is even an AWALT example. I've had male bosses with these same issues. All it proves is not to go to work for shitty bosses.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/15 12:12 AM
2

Arguably, she could seek to have the promissory note invalidated on the basis of signing it under duress. More practically, you've got a promissory note signed by someone with no ability to pay it back. Even if you sue her on it, all you have is a judgment against a broke-ass judgment proof debtor.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/15 08:42 PM
3

It has to be counterbalanced with the dangers of getting divorce raped, or having a baby with someone who is legitimately crazy. I would also argue that most of the data we have on "single parent" households are really talking about "single mother" households. The bias against men in custody battles all be ensures that there are not going to be many "single father" households where the mother does not get at least partial custody. And, like anything, it is situation dependent. A single parent wh…
/r/TheRedPill26/05/15 05:37 PM
4

Why is this any greater of a risk than having a child through more traditional means? Frankly, I would argue that having a child in the manner I posted about gives you the greatest security in this scenario. As the sole parent, you have exclusive control over setting up alternate custody arrangements to care for your child if something like a false rape accusation happened (or, in the more likely scenario, where you die before the child reaches the age of majority). There is no mom you have to c…
/r/TheRedPill26/05/15 05:31 PM
16

If you want kids, but absolutely don't want the possibility of the kid's mom taking them from you, then one option is to do the following: There are frozen eggs for sale just like frozen sperm. Go to a clinic and find a woman with good genetic stock in their catalog. Use her eggs. Have the clinic fertilize the egg(s) with your sperm. If you want, have the embryo screened for genetic abnormalities and gender. Many fertility clinics now offer this service, effectively allowing you to pick the gend…
/r/TheRedPill26/05/15 02:03 PM
1

Stop and think: why did she change her mind? She thought she would be better off without you, but then suddenly had a change of heart? What do you think you provide to her that she realized she needs? Whatever the answer, that's your most valuable resource to hoard and use as leverage in the divorce.
/r/MarriedRedPill25/05/15 04:16 AM
2

Depending on where you live, if she is heavily drinking while pregnant she can be arrested for child endangerment (assuming the jurisdiction has passed a statute allowing a fetus to be treated as a child for certain criminal purposes). It's the same reason someone who kills a pregnant woman can be charged with two homicides. Report her and at least keep her from harming the child. Otherwise, you'll likely be paying extra child support needed to take care of a kid born with fetal alcohol syndrome…
/r/TheRedPill25/05/15 04:12 AM
27

Far more likely is that she will just fuck up the child and it will born with a lot of problems. Which she can then convert into cash from OP in the form of extra child support to help take care of a special needs child.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/15 04:09 AM
26

If you build your career off her connections, you run the risk that she can convince her connections to take it all away from you if you piss her off. This is just another variety of the advice, "don't shit where you eat."
/r/TheRedPill25/05/15 12:27 AM
78

I'm guessing he was not alpha when they entered their relationship. He mentions that she tried to talk him into the open relationship by telling him that he looks much better now that he works out, and would therefore have an easier time getting other girls. She saw him as a BB, and saw the guy at work as the AF that she wanted to fuck before "settling down" with her BB/boyfriend in marriage. What she failed to realize was that her boyfriend was no longer the BB that she entered into the relatio…
/r/TheRedPill25/05/15 12:23 AM
1

Let's engage this debate. Back up some of what you say: You've stopped listening to logic a while ago and now firmly believe women are inferior to men and should be treated as such. Where does anyone believe that women are "inferior"? TRP teaches that the genders have defined roles. You're the one assigning value to those roles, and seem to assume that the role of women is the inferior one. Why do you assume this? You'll never have genuine success with women until you accept that you're fucking …
/r/TheRedPill24/05/15 07:21 PM
2

The fact that you automatically assume I'm a virgin because I don't like to cover myself in cum shows a real lack of critical thinking skills on your part, brother. Good luck with your scat fetish though. I'm sure it'll be great.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/15 03:39 PM
7

I don't sleep in my cum for the same reason I don't sleep in my own piss or shit: it's filthy. Old cum also stinks. If you've get a fetish for this, that's fine, but this isn't even close to a red pill behavior. Most likely the dates/attention you got were from the placebo effect of this raising your confidence.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/15 03:29 PM
-5

White knighting. verb. "In forum parlance, it means rushing to the aid of another poster for whatever reason."
/r/TheRedPill22/05/15 04:30 PM
3

It's not just OP's post. It's the 4 other people who have posted something identical to it over the past 72 hours. And it's the people who keep repeatedly posting this same shit about how this sub is on the verge of getting shut down that adds zero value to the discussion. But thanks for white knighting OP.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/15 04:27 PM
78

This Ellen Pao quote has been rehashed, ad nauseum, on this sub. Before this, there was some posts back in February worried about the same thing and that the sub will shut down. There were posts back in October 2014 worried about an impending shut down. Probably there were some posts before that too. We are men. Stop behaving like little ninnies worried that the big bad woman is going to kill us off. If reddit shuts down this sub, it will be unfortunate, but oh well. There is already a plan in p…
/r/TheRedPill22/05/15 03:33 PM
18

The two captioned tweets are the most interesting part of the article. For reference, they state: there's this cacophony of cultural messages telling us that male affection is precious & there's a trick to cultivating it. they're all lies -and- to any woman reading "how to get a man" franchises or sticking around in stale dissatisfying relationships: dick is abundant & low value One important concept epitomizing the female sexual strategy jumps out in those tweets: She conflates the idea of "aff…
/r/TheRedPill22/05/15 03:57 AM
7

No doubt we all like to blame external causes for our failures, whatever they may be. Part of TRP philosophy though is to own up to your own shortcomings and either overcome them or learn to work with them. Feminism--along with the tripe this woman is writing--preaches the exact opposite. Nothing is the fault of the women in whatever situation. Rather, it's the fault of the oppressive patriarchy, or asshole men professors who "take advantage" of young women.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/15 03:41 AM
90

Well, it would be different though. Because he's way more mature than any other student she's ever met. He just has such a better understanding of the world than most other students. And he's so good at talking to her. They just connect on a deeper level than she even does with men her own age. I mean, ya, she's still totally against professors dating students, but her situation is just different than the typical situation.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/15 12:04 AM
66

To a certain type of male professor, the fantasy of a dewy, impressed protégé is still seductive, a woman who he has easy power over, who is improved, tutored, made by him (as opposed to the female professors I know who are more likely to seek romantic companionship with someone more challenging, more in their league). What an utter lack of ownership about her own feelings and her gender's share of the responsibility. Many women find the idea of the older, intellectual man of power to be extreme…
/r/TheRedPill21/05/15 10:57 PM
6

Why put up with that shit??? Because feminism has conditioned men to believe that setting standards for what they want out of a relationship with a woman is "controlling" or even downright abusive. And God forbid that a man behaves like such an evil shitlord. Therefore, many men feel that the only alternative they have is to let a woman do what she wants under the auspices of "I trust her. They're just friends."
/r/TheRedPill21/05/15 09:26 PM
3

I think she would agree with you,but she at least recognizes the legitimacy of TRP concerns, that TRP isn't a hate group, and the underpinnings that caused TRP to arise.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/15 11:08 PM
3

Yes, you can expect to be spot banned elsewhere for posting here. That's why many users on this sub have a separate account they use for this sub only.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/15 07:09 PM
2

Ditto. I still can't figure out the exact reason for my ban from relationships though. As far as I can tell, they haven't done the kind of mass ban that offmychest has done. Any idea what your ban was for?
/r/TheRedPill20/05/15 06:39 PM
5

They apparently have a script they are using to cross reference anyone who has ever made a post or left a comment in offmychest to see if that user has ever subscribed to any other "bad" sub, such as TRP. Go make a couple if comments in offmychest. Doesn't matter what they say. Your ban will follow soon thereafter.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/15 06:37 PM
58

Right, except instead of using it to try to raise a decent human being, you are using it as a strategy to fuck that human being.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/15 12:50 AM
31

Exactly. From a female perspective, a man with his own kids: will provision financial resources to them instead of the her if forced to choose, will pick his kids over her will give his kids attention, meaning she gets less if he dies, will leave his life resources at least partly to his kid may have the presence of the children's mother in his life, meaning she sees a constant sexual threat from this previous sexual partner (not to mention the attention/resources she sees going out the door in …
/r/TheRedPill19/05/15 07:39 PM
9

Yup. There was an interesting post on here a while back about a feminist who started taking testosterone in order to live life as a man, and was shocked at how the hormone made her brain respond, especially to sexual stimuli. https://archive.is/stQg0
/r/TheRedPill19/05/15 03:54 PM
7

Yup. There were women who behaved like total shitheads before feminism. And if feminism disappeared today there would still be women who behaved like total shitheads. The only link to feminism is that she says she's being "harassed". But even if "harassment" wasn't some all encompassing bullshit that women bandy around in all manner of situations, this woman would have made up some other nonsensical reason to try to scare this guy off (such as claiming he was trespassing or loitering illegally).
/r/TheRedPill18/05/15 07:21 PM
1

Ok, several things: You don't even tell us where you live. Fuck, I don't even know if you are in the United States. It's really, really fucking hard to give you advice when I don't even know what laws you are under. You know that all 50 states have different laws on this kind of thing, right? Prenups are almost always enforceable in the United States. Courts actually favor enforcing them (I have a post coming in the next few days detailing more information about this). The keys are to not be a d…
/r/TheRedPill15/05/15 04:52 AM
1

I am a lawyer, and will try to get to this after work tonight. Check back tomorrow morning and I should have some thoughts. I actually am getting ready to do a series of posts I want to call "TRP Law School" that will deal generally with prenups, what provisions they can and can't have, and what to do to make sure they are enforceable. Not sure what your timeline is, but if you can wait for the next week or two, I will be posting them.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/15 06:00 PM
5

Quote from Morissey: Books on non-sexist language flip my life for the better, and I understand feminism to be a social saviour because it liberates everyone without exclusion. https://whathannahread.wordpress.com/2013/11/07/autobiography-by-morrissey/
/r/TheRedPill13/05/15 08:06 PM
5

Then he would have been crushed under the hambeast. On the bright side, he could cut her down a little more by when she sat on his lap by loudly exclaiming about how she is heavier than she looks.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/15 08:03 PM
7

When more women make themselves sexually available, the pool of marriageable men diminishes. This is true, but not in the way the author is meaning. The pool of men that women view as "marriageable" has decreased. These women all think that because they were "good enough" to fuck Chad, that they are good enough to get commitment from Chad and marry him too. When Chad doesn't commit, they look for his clone. Settling for a beta who is a good provider just won't cut it until they are well past the…
/r/TheRedPill13/05/15 05:04 PM
2

Actually, while this article is apparently a joke, this has been something that feminists in Sweden were fighting for in the late 90s/early 2000s. I actually remember reading about it at the time and being stunned. Here's one account of it: Already, a feminist group at Stockholm University is campaigning to scrap the urinals on the grounds that their construction — allowing male-only use is intrinsically sexist. According to Yola, they are encountering none of the laddish opposition they would m…
/r/TheRedPill13/05/15 04:55 PM
8

That they probably don't have opinions on anything significant (or at least don't express them). Or that they are just a "nice guy".
/r/TheRedPill13/05/15 04:28 AM
33

You can judge a lot about a man's character by looking not only at his friends, but also his enemies.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/15 04:22 PM
1

This is staged. And poorly acted to boot.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/15 04:33 AM
8

"Every drop of rain is like a tiny little phallus that the patriarchy was casting down upon me, trying to make me drown in a rape of rain."
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 11:54 PM
7

It's complete horseshit. Whether you want to shove this in the pocket of "fat acceptance" or the hamster running wild, it doesn't matter. It's like women saying they prefer sensitive guys who are in touch with their feelings and who help out with the cooking and cleaning. They think it's what they are supposed to say, but biology doesn't suddenly change just because of some shit they saw on The View.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 08:13 PM
4

Allows their hamster to run wild. "I don't want to fuck him because he's ripped... I want to fuck him because he's an intellectual and in touch with his feelings."
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 07:38 PM
6

Rollo touched on this in one of his posts a few months ago concerning that book, The Wild Oats Project written by the middle-aged woman who left her husband to fuck around for a year. He describes this as the "Redevelopment Phase," saying: The Redevelopment phase can either be a time of relational turmoil or one of a woman reconciling her hypergamous balance with the man she’s paired with. The security side of this hypergamous balance has been established for her long term satisfaction and the A…
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 05:41 PM
30

What savings? As a generation, the baby boomers have been incredibly irresponsible on personal fiscal matters. The generation that spent its youth decrying the materialist trappings of then-modern society promptly spent the 1980s and 90s incurring massive amounts of debt while simultaneously saving nothing, all so they could buy worthless shit. They cashed out the equity in their homes to buys stupid shit like boats and cars. The "invested" in fly-by-night scams in the stock market leading up to…
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 04:07 PM
61

At this point, all he has done is obtain approval to collect signatures to get this measure on the ballot. He has to get over 360,000 signatures before it will actually appear on a ballot in an election. You don't get that number of signatures with a few friends going door-to-door or setting up a table outside of a few Kroger's. Unless he is well-heeled in order to hire an army of canvassers, or has a very active grassroots network, don't expect this to end up on the ballot. And even if it ends …
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 10:53 PM
3

The problem is that some people are so wrapped up in themselves that they always think they are the prize. Your premise in the original post (which I do agree with) requires that the woman have at least some ability for rational assessment to compare real-world SMVs between you and her. If she lacks that, she will always perceive herself as higher, regardless of how much you improve.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 08:04 PM
2

Bingo. Ideology becomes a threat to those who don't believe in it when the ideology doesn't just stop at philosophical masturbation, but rather gives people actual concrete steps they can take to better engrain the ideology into their lives.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 07:35 PM
0

are you subscribed to that sub?
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 07:32 PM
8

Mine is legit. Fuck it. Should be working anyway.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 07:30 PM
32

Not sure if it's related to the inquisition against TRP, but I just received a ban from /r/relationships. That may just because I'm an asshole though.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 04:03 PM
2

It's always legal to fuck them. It's just illegal to pay them for it.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/15 08:52 PM
2

If you look at the divorce decree (PDF linked elsewhere in the comments), the court does go through some of the work Sue Ann did at Continental Resources (the source of most of their wealth). It starts at paragraph 161. She is a licensed attorney and at various points served as Vice President of the company. I'm not justifying that her work was worth billions, but she also wasn't just a worthless hole laying around to be fucked. She no doubt deserved less than billions, but the court (I believe …
/r/TheRedPill29/04/15 04:13 PM
4

especially if I didn’t do anything to deserve it. The problem is she does think she deserves. After all, she had to live in his mansion, spend his money, and sometimes fuck him.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/15 01:32 PM
2

Take a look through the comments. I posted a link to a PDF of the actual divorce decree. It goes through great detail of all the evidence the court heard and how it came up with the property division. It's around 100 pages though, so expect a long read. For most people, the reason a 50-50 split occurs is because the husband and wife don't have any separate pre-marital property at the time of divorce. This could be because they really didn't have shit when they got married, or because they conver…
/r/TheRedPill29/04/15 01:17 PM
1

A well made prenup would have helped. She'd still be entitled to property earned during marriage. This would include growth of a pre-marriage company to the extent the marriage had an effect on the growth (such as allowing him to work on the company while she stayed home to raise the kids and keep the house).
/r/TheRedPill29/04/15 12:05 PM
2

This is simply no true. I'm a lawyer. A prenup being invalidated is the rare exception. Really, the only time previous get invalidated is when: (1) you don't give your fiancé the opportunity to have their lawyer examine it before they have to sign it, or (2) when the prenup deals with things affecting future kids like custody or child support (and even then they are only invalidated to the extent of those provisions dealing with kids), or (3) you have provisions dealing with dividing up assets e…
/r/TheRedPill29/04/15 12:04 PM
2

There's actually several billionaires who live in the shithole I call home. There's oil here.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/15 12:00 PM
1

I don't dispute she divorce raped him. It just made me giddy to see her greed foiled her attempts at being even more greedy.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/15 11:59 AM
3

Divorce is a "no fault" situation. Doesn't matter who files. Under the old fault-based divorced regime, the party who filed (usually the woman) still got big alimony and property divisions. The filer would have to prove the non-filing spouse was at fault for the marriage not working (such as abuse, abandonment or adultery).
/r/TheRedPill29/04/15 11:57 AM
4

If anyone would like to read the actual divorce decree that awarded Sue Ann the money and the basis for that award, it's here (it's also damn long): http://s3.amazonaws.com/content.newsok.com/documents/hamm-divorce.pdf
/r/TheRedPill29/04/15 03:19 AM
35

He is serious. And she is very likely to sue her attorneys. Not just for this fuckup, but for a bigger one that happened earlier in the case. Mr. Hamm apparently offered Sue Ann something like $4-5 billion as a settlement. Her lawyers allegedly advised her against taking it, telling her she would get more at trial. Instead, she only got $1 billion. That is probably where the bigger part of the malpractice claim will come into play (assuming that it is true). The good news is that the she won't c…
/r/TheRedPill29/04/15 03:13 AM
24

The best part is where he actually has to spell out the dollar amount and take it all the way through two lines because it's such a big fucking number.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/15 03:09 AM
23

It is worth noting that Mr. Hamm neglected to get a prenup. Even though he was well into his adulthood and had an established business when he married Sue Ann. Oh, and Sue Ann was his second wife. The system is already not in a man's favor. No need to give yourself self-inflicted wounds on top of it.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/15 03:07 AM
48

Probably not a penny. She said she wanted to appeal because a billion dollars was unfair and that she and her kids couldn't live on that.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/15 12:27 AM
16

If so, it's been a damn long con. The original one was posted about 6-9 months ago. It's pretty detailed throughout. Details fuckups along the way. It doesn't read like a self-masturbatory post because it doesn't just talk about how awesome he is. Some of it is actually pretty gut-wrenching and embarrassing shit.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/15 08:58 PM
15

This reads like you are still letting her control you. Do you have trouble being in the same room with any other woman on earth that you don't give a fuck about? Probably not. Yet for this one woman, it looks like you went and hid in your car to avoid her. That's why all your friends were acting weird about your behavior. It looks to the outside world like you still have very, very bad oneitis. Next time, go in. You can ignore her. Be as polite to her as you would to any stranger you don't want …
/r/TheRedPill24/04/15 04:03 PM
22

It's not personally something I would do, but I understand why some guys will. As you point out, she's going to do it anyway. If she's going to fuck anyone, may as well be you. You're not the one "disrespecting" her vows. You never took the vows or promised fidelity to her husband. It's no more an issue of respect than stealing someone's girlfriend or plating a woman when you know damn well she is trying to get commitment from you that you will never give to her. Treating marriage as something m…
/r/TheRedPill24/04/15 12:32 AM
1

For those curious, FPH = Fat People Hate.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/15 04:29 AM
3

Imagine this scenario. You and your guy buddy get married. He is a good dude, but kind of lazy. Meanwhile, you're a kick-ass go getter. 5 years after you get hitched, he's still working a shitty dead end job. Meanwhile, you've climbed the corporate ladder, are making a great salary, and have several other side businesses as a source of additional income. Simply put, you are both cash and asset rich. Your buddy sees this and gets jealous. So what does he do? He divorces your ass. Suddenly, your b…
/r/TheRedPill22/04/15 10:56 PM
7

After the funeral, you haven't done anything to fail. The funeral was the last "interaction" with your father. All that's left now is his "stuff" and the cunt who wants to monetize it. You could fight her on this, especially if your dad didn't have a will. Odds are, the intestacy laws of your state would give you (and your dad's other biological and adopted children) the automatic right to a certain percentage of his estate. Depending on the value of the estate and your financial situation, that…
/r/TheRedPill20/04/15 07:31 PM
50

The calc homework is also a bullshit cover story. She just wanted to know that she still had enough hooks in you to get you to show up to her house in person. Guess she found out she does.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/15 02:25 AM
41

I'm surprised that she didn't include the part where she didn't tell her BB boyfriend about the gangbang. Because, obviously, she thinks he would be a really good father and take care of them both, so why tell him? It's really none of his business anyway what she does with her body, right?
/r/TheRedPill15/04/15 01:11 AM
1

Kids at our school had a party in 7th grade where about 6 girls and 6 guys all lost their virginity to each other (my middle school was pretty small, so this was like 10% of our class). Some of these same girls were pregnant in 8th grade. And this was 20+ years ago. Teens acting like sluts is nothing new (and wasn't even in my time).
/r/TheRedPill14/04/15 07:01 PM
1

I would not get a vasectomy if you think there's a chance you may want kids. They are difficult to reverse, and reversals are often unsuccessful.
/r/TheRedPill14/04/15 06:59 PM
5

Trying to take revenge is basically the opposite of an abundance mentality. It shows you had too much invested in this girl and are mourning her loss. Odds are that the BB boyfriend won't believe you anyway. His sweet, pure girlfriend would never do anything like that (with him), so you must be a liar.
/r/TheRedPill14/04/15 06:56 PM
1

I can probably do something like that over the next couple weeks and at least make it a standalone post with some extra info.
/r/TheRedPill13/04/15 04:38 PM
1

This one is beyond my expertise. I don't really have much knowledge in the way of the effect divorce can have on freezing foreign assets, passport revocation, etc...
/r/TheRedPill11/04/15 11:16 PM
1

No doubt some judges might bump up the child support thing as a "make up" for a wife who waived alimony. But I would still say that, from what I've seen, is the exception. In a lot of states child support (unlike alimony) is subject to tighter formulaic restrictions that help to limit the judge's discretion. Obviously, it's more of a guideline than a rule, but it still reigns in most judges from going too far afield. Again though, I'm just describing what I've seen, so it could be difference in …
/r/TheRedPill11/04/15 03:33 PM
1

My understanding is actually the opposite. In the 1960s I don't believe any states allowed alimony waivers, and few even would recognize the validity of a prenup at all for any purpose. That has been steadily changing, and I believe most states have made the move towards recognizing alimony waivers. I may be wrong on that though, so I'm open to looking at any evidence to the contrary that shows the shift is towards not recognizing these waivers.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/15 03:03 PM
1

Possibly. Especially if you want provisions in there dealing with waiving alimony (if those waivers are allowed in your jurisdiction). Also, keep in mind that $5k may not be much now, but if invested it could be worth a substantial amount in 20 years. A prenup could be used to not only protect the $5k, but the capital gains/growth of that $5k.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/15 03:44 AM
1

No. Well, at least most prenups actually prepared by a lawyer don't. Prenups that you pay $25 for on the Internet are likely to be total shit and not comply with the requirements of your jurisdiction (and hence those prenups will get tossed). Similarly, if you try to put in shit about handling children (like custody or child support), those provisions will be tossed (but the rest of the prenup may be enforced). As a general rule, prenups should deal with keeling separate premarital assets and pr…
/r/TheRedPill11/04/15 03:42 AM
2

Far more atypical than typical from what I've seen. But not outside the realm of possibility.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/15 03:35 AM
2

I frequent both. I am married. I think there is a place for both subs, and that MRP is useful for what it holds itself out to be: a place for married men to learn about and apply red pill principles. I don't think many people in the main TRP sub that aren't married or in an LTR would find MRP's content to be very useful, as the main TRP sub members tend to eschew marriage and actively discourage it.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/15 03:17 AM
2

It could possibly be. But again, keep in mind you cannot be both the trustee (person in control) and the beneficiary (person receiving the benefits). If you want to be the beneficiary, that means someone else must have, at a minimum, co-control of the trust property. Also, if it is a revocable trust, it doesn't offer any protection in a divorce. The power to revoke is seen as the same thing as outright ownership in most jurisdictions. Trusts can be useful for many things. I just don't think they…
/r/TheRedPill10/04/15 11:09 PM
4

Not usually. But judges will strike down anything in a prenup dealing with children (custody arrangement, child support limitations, etc) because those provisions violate public policy.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/15 11:04 PM
1

It certainly could be. But, for me, I have a few thoughts on this: Do you really want to live off your wife's money if you get divorced? I like knowing that I've earned and fought for most of what I have in life. It would be tough for me to decide that I am entitled to half of the stuff my wife had when marrying me simply because we got married. If she has that much stuff and is too dumb (or just ignorant) to want a prenup, is she actually marriage material? Do you think she will be making more …
/r/TheRedPill10/04/15 07:19 PM
36

Biological urge or not, it still is a rationally controlled process. And the point still stands that both behaviors have inherent risk so we should at least educate people on how to best protect themselves in the event they decide to undertake such behavior. My point is not that marriage is good or that people should do it. It's that if people are going to do it anyway despite the warnings to the contrary, they should at least put in place whatever protections they can.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/15 06:42 PM
2

I got out of private practice several years ago and now am in-house at a large corporation doing their oil and gas legal work. Even when I was still doing private work though, I wasn't too jaded. Most of the problems I saw were ones that, when looking at it as a third party, were very easily resolvable. They just couldn't get resolved because the parties on each side were too angry and entrenched to behave rationally. So, rather than setting the terms of their own futures, they would turn the pr…
/r/TheRedPill10/04/15 06:31 PM
13

This isn't just the danger of the prenup; it's the danger of marrying someone who is vindictive. If she wasn't fighting over the prenup she'd be fighting over everything else. The value of the house, businesses, and all other assets still have to be determined in order to have an equitable property division. On balance, I would still argue that people are generally better with a prenup than without one. This is especially true if you already have some assets of value when going into the marriage…
/r/TheRedPill10/04/15 06:11 PM
14

See my other comment regarding the house. If he titled it in both their names, it would become marital property and she'd be entitled to at least some (if not all) of it in a divorce. As far as I know, there is no firm guideline on how long alimony lasts in relation to the marriage length. In theory, they should be directly correlated. But that 1:2 ratio you mention is almost certainly not set in stone. If the system was that hard and fast, there wouldn't be near the worry over divorce rapes. On…
/r/TheRedPill10/04/15 05:58 PM
9

When he got it, he may have titled it in both their names. I know some community property states also have a lot of quirks involving inheritance. There just isn't enough information here for me to think that OP's story is beyond the realm of possibility.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/15 05:53 PM
79

I view this as a similar debate that we have in America to teaching abstinence vs. safe sex. Is abstinence the best method of preventing pregnancy and STDs? Absolutely. Are people still going to have sex though? Absolutely. Therefore, it makes sense to teach people how to have sex as safely as possible. I'd say the same is true with marriage. Obviously, the safest route is not getting married. But, realistically, we know that most men will end up getting married at some point. So simply saying "…
/r/TheRedPill10/04/15 05:51 PM
2

I do not know of any. Each person's' financial situation is going to be unique, especially if they have assets actually worth protecting. The point of the #1 in my post is that you shouldn't be pulling something off the internet in the hope that it will protect you. You need someone who will look at your situation, know your jurisdiction's laws, and will tailor a prenup that is best for your particular circumstances. Yes, it will cost you a few thousand bucks to get a decent lawyer to draft a pr…
/r/TheRedPill10/04/15 05:45 PM
5

Because that might not be true. There are shitty judges and bad lawyers out there. If they got a bad decision from the trial judge and the lawyer was too dumb to tell his client to appeal, something like this is actually fairly plausible.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/15 04:14 PM
19

Placing things like life insurance benefits in an irrevocable trust makes sense. Placing assets you need access to does not. You cannot be both the trustee and beneficiary of a trust. That means someone else has control over your assets and can decide how to distribute them. That's never a good position to be in if you need something.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/15 04:07 PM
243

As a lawyer, I cannot stress enough that at a minimum you must do the following if you get married: Get a prenup. Get a competent lawyer to draft it. If you have the financial wherewithal, get a second lawyer from a different firm to review it and make suggestions. Two sets of eyes are better than one. Take any suggestions back to the first lawyer and ask if he would incorporate them and, if not why he wouldn't recommend doing those changes. Make sure your fiancé has her own separate lawyer revi…
/r/TheRedPill10/04/15 03:50 PM
17

Given her post history, I'm fairly certain that what she's saying is total bullshit. She's a crusader out to make a point, not to tell the truth. Edit: To add to this, she states in one of her comments: I was actually in an abusive relationship a year ago, so I will draw from experience with that as well. If you look at her post history, she also started posting on BluePill over a year ago. So, putting two and two together (I'm a neckbeard, so it's a wonder I can do that), despite being someone …
/r/TheRedPill09/04/15 10:54 PM
18

She's not just teasing. She's setting up a false reality of what was offered and what you turned away. She is framing it as you rejecting her request for sex. The reality is that you rejected her attempt for attention; sex was never really on the table. I would suggest continuing to ignore that kind of behavior when she does it. Seem disinterested or bored by it. That will start to show her that jiggling her tits will not get her the attention she wants. When she then asks why you are rejecting …
/r/MarriedRedPill09/04/15 03:39 PM
1

What country are you in? If you are in the US, the prenup won't really be able to affect assets earned during marriage. Depending on your jurisdiction, you might be able to get her to waive spousal support payments, but that would be about it. Best to check with a lawyer in your own jurisdiction.
/r/MarriedRedPill09/04/15 12:27 AM
2

Getting truly fucked over by bad service is very rare, though you do have to act to stem any damage. For what I have seen, instances of bad service, process servers lying, etc... are pretty rare. In my experience, it all goes as it should about 99% of the time. When it doesn't go as it should, most of those few instances are quickly corrected. It is the rarest of rare instances where it gets as fucked up as what this guy in Michigan is facing. When service does get fucked up, This could be a typ…
/r/TheRedPill07/04/15 09:23 PM
2

For advice, check out AskAndyAboutClothes. It has a very active forum as well as style and sizing guides directed more towards professionals. http://www.askandyaboutclothes.com/
/r/MarriedRedPill07/04/15 08:14 PM
5

Then be a smart man and get a DNA test shortly after a child is born. One of the cardinal principals in the law - including outside the paternity context - is that you cannot sleep on your rights and choose to exercise them just when it becomes opportune. And, though we like to (perhaps rightly) complain about this system, it is not the result of some feminist lobbying. This system is a damn sight better than what our grandparents had, where (in many US states) a child born in wedlock was conclu…
/r/TheRedPill06/04/15 10:47 PM
11

I'm guessing your limited experience with family court (if any) is probably confined to your own divorce. Spend some actual time with clients going through through divorce and dealing with infidelity, and then report back to me on what men actually want when it comes to "their" children. Because I'm not speaking from hamstering; I'm speaking from what I personally observed in my private practice days.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/15 09:58 PM
6

That case is more of an anomaly and is likely tainted with fraud that will eventually get the support order overturned. Based on what I've read about it, the mother in that case listed this guy as the father on some welfare papers she filed. The state (which pays the welfare benefits) goes after deadbeat dads in cases like this to recover some of the welfare money. Before that happens, the state is required to provide actual notice of their intent to do this. The purpose of this notice is to (am…
/r/TheRedPill06/04/15 09:15 PM
3

Maybe...MAYBE most people these days have gym memberships, but I guarantee you most people these days don't work out. Were that the case, obesity rates would be far lower. Hell, just thinking of friends and coworkers, less than 25% of the men work out at least once a week. It may be higher for certain cohorts, but not for the population at large.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/15 08:27 PM
4

Being in the top 20% of men at a gym probably would put you in the top 1-2% of men in society at large. The population of gym-goers is far more fit than the general public.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/15 08:13 PM
4

Most states don't allow the mother to sign the father's name on the birth certificate (though some might). A party generally must sign the certificate themselves. Otherwise, single moms everywhere would be listing rich dudes like Bill Gates on birth certificates.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/15 07:57 PM
38

Sigh.... You're blowing these rulings out of proportion and leaving out the context of what is really happening. Most states in the US create a presumption of paternity in certain circumstances. For example, if a child is born in wedlock, the husband of the woman who gave birth is presumed by the law to be the father. Similarly, if a man voluntarily and openly acknowledges a child to be his own (such as listing himself as the "father" on the birth certificate or child's school registration), the…
/r/TheRedPill06/04/15 06:55 PM
6

A female's (high) status doesn't really add much (if anything) to their SMV. It's why you don't find 60+ year old female CEOs dating 20 year old high-SMV males.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/15 04:07 PM
3

That was some surprisingly thorough analysis.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/15 09:18 PM
2

Ah, yes. Yet another happy female HAES (health at any size) adherent. Anyone else notice how it tends to be women that jump on that bandwagon? I'm guessing it's because they need to form in a collective because their hamsters are too overweight to handle the solo cardio mission of even basic rational thought. What she describes to maintain her weight doesn't sound like that much of a chore. Dessert "only 3 nights a week" seems a bit excessive, actually. Similarly, going to the gym "every other d…
/r/MarriedRedPill03/04/15 07:59 PM
4

Give her the ole' upper decker to go with it.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/15 07:22 PM
28

Ironically, now that you've demonstrated to her that you know your own value, she may actually become interested in you. The fact that she spent the evening complaining about you shows she's already on the path to doing that. Of course, the bitter irony that will come with it is, as soon as you show any attention to her or proceed to slip back into betatude, she will immediately start treating you like she used to.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/15 07:16 PM
25

It's like Pokemon, but instead of improving it devolves into a gelatinous sack of shit and unstable emotions.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/15 07:05 PM
1

One: Regarding manliness: There is no irony in this. This is a place to share ideas. Most people treat it like a buffet. Take and incorporate the ideas that seem to work and leave the others behind. Much like people do with religion or any other form of "self help," you find what works and try to build those ideals in your life to make yourself better. I don't give a shit if those ideas come from strangers on the internet, the Bible, or a PhD. The part I care about is whether or not the rational…
/r/TheRedPill02/04/15 08:44 PM
1

Fair point. While possibly fun, the danger with throwing gas on the fire is you can also get burned.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/15 08:20 PM
13

While I don't necessarily disagree with you, this kind of thinking is what allows women to get away with this shit Let's say he waits until the child is born and just plays it straight by telling the bf the mom was trying to slut it up with OP. Will the situation be an less stressful on the half sibling? Is it any less fair to the newborn child that his parents will likely separate as a result? Or that the mom's breast milk production will probably decrease from the stress? Or that the house wil…
/r/TheRedPill02/04/15 06:05 PM
3

Throw some gas on the fire: Send screencaps of the texts to the bf. Tell him you aren't sure if the kid is his or yours, and that he needs to get a paternity test done. That will make for a fun ~9 months for the both of them.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/15 05:23 PM
1

With due respect, this seems like blatant advertising, not advice. Do you derive any financial benefit from people using this service?
/r/TheRedPill31/03/15 04:46 PM
11

You may be right. In my way of thinking though, had she said a much lower number (like 15) I doubt OP be any less grossed out about it. This is one where I feel 50 is probably close to the real number (may be 55 or 60). If she wanted to come across as less slutty, she would have said like 10 or 12 (couldn't feasibly go lower given what OP knows of her past).
/r/TheRedPill25/03/15 04:19 AM
2

Even if true, that doesn't mean you need to settle for someone who has so fully debased themselves, anymore than someone would have to settle for you. Moreover, the point with this is that what you are getting is not what is actually advertised as being in the package. You will have to work for what was given away so freely with many of these women. Nothing like only getting a BJ on your birthday after you've cleaned the gutters when she used to drop to her knees and suck off random strangers in…
/r/TheRedPill25/03/15 03:04 AM
101

Let number 52 deal with this shit.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/15 03:02 AM
5

You should really cross-post this to /r/conspiracy. They'd be all over your brilliant insights.
/r/TheRedPill23/03/15 09:27 PM
7

I did tons of stupid shit in college. I was also very open about it with my now-wife. The issue (for most people here) isn't that she used to have threesomes. It's that she presented a picture of sexual virtue to her husband that she knew he wanted her to have, when the reality is that her actions did not actually reflect that sexual virtue. And, once her lie was exposed, her go to response is to try to fuck him over financially by seeking to invalidate an agreement (the prenup) that she volunta…
/r/TheRedPill23/03/15 07:59 PM
3

They got far less reasonable after that archive snapshot was taken.
/r/TheRedPill23/03/15 07:55 PM
86

I could go into other interesting details, but the relevant thing for this story is that last week, after we'd been broken up for 2 months, she wrote me just to tell me that she's started dating somebody and is veeeeery happy. All she wanted me to know is that a) he has an "empire", and b) he fucks better than I do. If she actually believed what she wrote, then she wouldn't have written it to you. The fact she is still trying to make you jealous is all the proof you need that she still thinks yo…
/r/TheRedPill22/03/15 05:32 PM
1

Sounds like she's only in town for spring break. Probably not a regular problem because she's only around when she's not in school.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/15 04:48 AM
2

I'm asking you to reconcile the inconsistency, which you still have not done. Your statement: "Meaning there is no possible way for oil to ever go above that [$87] in 2014." Reality: oil selling in excess of $100/bbl in 2014. Again, please reconcile this inconsistency. I'm aware it was selling for more than $87/bbl in 2014. That is my point. Your point is that it would be impossible for that to have happened given the Hillsdale graph. Please defend your point.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/15 10:12 PM
6

Morality is almost always ambiguous. This cock sucker broke the fucking law. What he did is theft, plain and simple. A street mugger may be "alpha," but that doesn't mean that he's not a piece of shit who is undeserving of scorn and jail time.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/15 08:59 PM
4

Yay. A peak oiler. Let's ignore the fact that bears in the oil market have been crying gloom and doom since the 1980s. The most glaring problem is the fact that you point out in 2014 oil only powered around $87 of economic activity (Hillsdale chart), and then you make the point that "Meaning there is no possible way for oil to ever go above that in 2014." Of course, one year ago today, WTI crude was trading around $102/bbl. Brent crude was even higher. Care to explain why that was?
/r/TheRedPill18/03/15 08:54 PM
3

Face lift, Botox, and long hair. The trifecta play for aging women trying to hold onto any semblance of their youthful attractiveness.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/15 08:41 PM
27

Her mom has purchased her a ticket to fly back home later this week, I'm just waiting it out until then. Sounds like she's getting the boot this week.
/r/TheRedPill17/03/15 06:09 PM
18

I am an attorney working in-house for a US mid-major domestic energy company. Take my thoughts for what they're worth. You're picking a rough time to want to get in the oil industry. Drilling is down. Lots of layoffs right now. If you want to be in the oil industry, I would suggest going to college to study either geology, drilling engineering or petroleum engineering. Those fields are where you will make the most money and find the most demand for professionals. Going to college for a few years…
/r/TheRedPill15/03/15 04:47 PM
4

True. But his kids are now 4 years old. I know in my state (Oklahoma) you can only challenge it until the children are 2 years old.
/r/TheRedPill13/03/15 02:27 PM
5

I should have been more clear. It's not just the listing of a name; it's the signature. When a child is born in marriage he would generally have to sign the birth certificate. This is usually done in the hospital very shortly after the child is born. Usually both spouses are together when it happens and in front of nurses or doctors, so there is a tremendous amount of social pressure to sign it. Once you are on there (signature), you would have to go court to have your name removed. And even the…
/r/TheRedPill13/03/15 02:18 PM
98

She needn't worry. In most jurisdictions in the US he will have been listed as the father on the children's birth certificate for long enough that he is now conclusively presumed to be the father in the eyes of the law. No amount of DNA testing or other evidence can rebut that conclusive presumption. So, even if he divorces her cheating ass he would still have to pay child support for those bastard children. Just like a good cuckold should.
/r/TheRedPill13/03/15 05:13 AM
16

She outs me, and I out her as a prostitute. The difference is that if you out her as a prostitute, there are few, if any, ramifications for her. Other men will still fuck her. Some BB will probably think she's golden for reforming herself and marry her anyways. You, on the other hand, end up getting divorced, losing at least half your shit, paying a hefty alimony, lose access to your kids, get forced to pay egregious child support, etc...
/r/TheRedPill12/03/15 04:35 AM
3

Being aesthetically pleasing to look at makes most things in life easier, including getting women. Not being aesthetically pleasing to look at makes most things in life harder, including getting women. Does that mean that guys that aren't physically attractive cannot succeed with women? Absolutely not. It just makes it harder to do so; they have to be higher caliber in other areas to show good SMV.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/15 03:23 AM
8

No, they don't get thrown out "all the time". It's a rarity in the US for a prenup to get tossed. Statements about courts routinely ignoring them are like the bro-science of legal advice. Here's the deal: the vast majority of prenups are enforced. When they aren't, it's typically because either they did not contain the proper legal requirements (like a notarization), or they contained provisions that directly conflict with the law (like trying to take away assets from a spouse that were acquired…
/r/TheRedPill10/03/15 07:09 PM
1

The clinginess is kind of a shit test. She is testing you to see if you will capitulate into her calls for attention at the expense of your own interests and pursuits. Don't totally blow her off, but don't give into most of them. Offer her some comfort, but make it clear that it comes on your terms and timeframe, not hers.
/r/MarriedRedPill10/03/15 03:14 AM
8

I did Google it. The results were useless and gave no context about use of the term in Sweden. The poster indicated the phrase was colloquial, so my location wasn't a cop out but rather an explanation that the request for information was a result of me not being familiar with it. Also, are you a mod? If not, then stop pretending you speak for this sub.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/15 05:30 PM
2

nigger-chavs should be self-explanatory As an American, I honestly have no idea what is meant by this.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/15 05:14 PM
1

There is thought to be a correlation, though it is not definitive. http://www.health.harvard.edu/family_health_guide/testosterone-prostate-cancer-and-balding-is-there-a-link-thefamilyhealth-guide
/r/TheRedPill06/03/15 03:55 AM
2

Bullshit. I've tested this theory on multiple occasions. Those sticky bastards just lay on the floor, or will occasionally make a wobbly roll until they run into a wall or something. I have yet to meet a pastry that I can't beat in a foot race.
/r/MarriedRedPill04/03/15 05:19 PM
5

Travel the world. Use that travel to meet interesting people, see interesting things, and accumulate interesting stories. Those things are attractive. Plus, while in the strange lands, you'll be an exotic foreigner and have a chance to hookup with the natives.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/15 05:58 AM
46

Well, it is a widely accepted feminist fact that science has a masculine bias. I mean, science uses things like a "hypotHEsis" and a "tHEory". Why is there no "hypotHERsis"? Why is there no "tHERory"? It just goes to show that male privilege so completely dominates the sciences that it can't be trusted when addressing women's issues.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/15 08:13 PM
72

From the 2XC post: The thing that's really infuriating about it was there were signs that indicated this may be happening but were ignored by every Dr I've seen in the past few years. I love how this is her doctor's fault. If you read the rest of her post, she mentions going to online forums for support and being surprised at how common it is that post-35 women are not able to conceive. She is truly shocked by this, stating: And if I'm not some special snowflake how could this be so easily over …
/r/TheRedPill02/03/15 05:19 PM
3

Yup. It's more like an auction where the 20 or so lowest bidders get to use the item for several years before the highest bidder gets to finally take it home. But by then it's all worn, the finished is marred, and it just doesn't perform the way it used to because it's all played out.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/15 03:08 PM
0

I don't know why, but I'm always somewhat surprised at the idea of obese French women. It's just hard for me to picture.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/15 03:02 PM
5

Cobwebs and caked dust don't appear that quickly. Same with the level of bathroom grime he's talking about.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/15 03:00 PM
4

I don't believe so. I can also guarantee you that if it was written to apply only to the lies told by men (not by women), it would also not survive a constitutional challenge. Laws generally have to apply equally to genders absent the existence of some compelling basis to allow the contrary. Given that women can and do lie to men (partner count, exclusivity, age, etc.) to initiate sex with those men, there wouldn't be a basis to make the law apply to men only. Basically, this is what happens whe…
/r/TheRedPill02/03/15 02:44 PM
9

This would almost certainly never withstand constitutional scrutiny in the U.S. Recall in 2005 the US Congress passed the "Stolen Valor Act" which broadened previous provisions addressing the unauthorized wear, manufacture, or sale of any military decorations and medals by making it a misdemeanor to falsely represent oneself as having received any U.S. military decoration or medals. Someone sued saying the act violated first amendment free speech protections. The government defended the act sayi…
/r/TheRedPill02/03/15 01:18 PM
38

Same thing if you bruise the back of her throat with your cock or bareback her in the ass. Those don't count as sex because she's not in love when she has them. The interesting corollary is that this likely means she won't do those things with the man she does claim to love.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/15 03:48 AM
34

Or look in the sidebar under the link called "Glossary of Terms and Acronyms".
/r/TheRedPill02/03/15 03:43 AM
4

She's still dictating the terms of sex. "Oh, you've been a good boy. So here's a sex coupon. For your fantasies (because you can only act out fantasies when she's in a giving mood). Oh, but here are the things that aren't allowed, even if they are your fantasy." I'm not saying don't enjoy yourself, but this isn't a redpill topic. Your wife treating fun sex with her like a "special gift" is about as blue pill as it gets.
/r/MarriedRedPill02/03/15 12:02 AM
49

Probably some post-sex ASD for her too. She knows that any text from you would just be for sex. Her saying not to text her was her ASD coming in to prevent herself from thinking she could just be a booty call. Fortunately for you, her desire for AF trumps the ASD's hesitations.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/15 09:05 PM
2

Well, he has his coworker to back up his story, especially since he banged this chick in the same room as his coworker and the other woman. I would chance a false rape allegation in that scenario any day over one where it's just me and a girl one-on-one and just my word against hers.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/15 07:50 PM
28

It's a real problem for a lot of people. It's also become something that serves as an easy scapegoat for boys' behavior and is incredibly over diagnosed because giving a kid a couple pills is easier than the work it takes to instill discipline. And the idea that teachers can diagnose it is fucking ludicrous.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/15 02:34 PM
9

The "I had a dream about you" thing is pretty much the worst attempt females have at trying to get a male to engage them on conversation. "Oh! Your sleep addled mind conjured together a bunch of nonsensical bullshit that tangentially involved me. Please, tell me all about it!"
/r/TheRedPill26/02/15 05:30 PM
1

Am I the only one tired of these self-brag posts that offer no insight into any concepts or any useful advice on TRP issues? OP, what was your point in posting this?
/r/TheRedPill26/02/15 05:25 PM
2

You don't really seem to want to understand. And one of the main things with this sub is we don't want people to "join us". This is not a movement. It's an analysis of human behavior and application of those observances to gain advantage. Feminism is a movement that tries to get people to join. TRP is a discussion/debate on self improvement and sexual strategy.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/15 06:28 AM
86

I would be very curious to know how much that service charges these 28-36 year old women. My guess is a hell of a lot less than the ~$3,000 they wanted to charge you. They are like a BB middleman. "Hey all you post wall ladies. Sign up for free and we will find some schlub to support you. Only caveat is that his wallet will be $3000 lighter by the time you get him."
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 07:08 PM
2

Not sure who downvoted you, but you are right. I am probably the only human in recorded history to get a sunburn in England on an overcast day.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/15 08:05 PM
3

Here's a rule of thumb to live by: a paragraph should never have more than about 6 sentences. If it does, odds are you need to split them up. Also, don't ever use that shorthand shit that girls use in text messages unless it is somehow relevant to the story. Nobody wants to decipher it. Nobody cares that "btw that's how she types" because it is absolutely irrelevant to your story. When you are relaying the story to the sub, just type out what she said as if she actually knew how to type in Engli…
/r/TheRedPill20/02/15 11:50 PM
7

It is hard, dangerous work though, which is why it pays so well. It is difficult to find someone who has been a roughneck for more than 10 years that still has all their fingers. No lie.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/15 01:44 PM
8

In Oklahoma (and likely most everywhere else), no, it cannot. The presumption exists for the protection of the child, and so the parents are unable to prospectively waive it.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/15 06:10 AM
76

Lawyer here. Just want to weigh in a little bit on something related to this rather absurd result. Most states have laws on the books--typically in some form of the Uniform Parentage Act enacted by their state legislature--related to something called the "presumption of paternity." This means that, in certain instances, the law presumes you to be the father of a child. The most common example of when this presumption will apply is during marriage; the law presumes you to be the father of any chi…
/r/TheRedPill20/02/15 04:52 AM
1

(Un)fortunately, no. Though I do get to spend the next week of my life hanging out in SE NM to take depositions of various field hands in a lawsuit my company is involved in. So I've got that going for me, which is nice.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/15 04:29 AM
7

Stabalizing doesn't mean more drilling. Prices may stabilize at $50 or even $60. For many of the shale oil plays in the US that still won't economically work. The decline rates on those wells is very steep. The price of oil during the first 90-180 days of production will make or break the well's profitability because that's when the bulk of the oil will be produced. Since the oil will stay in the ground, comp iss are going to wait until prices rebound before engaging in a lot of drilling again. …
/r/TheRedPill20/02/15 01:59 AM
2

Yes. The best kind of jobs will be for petro professionals (geologists, reservoir engineers, etc.). Those require a degree. Safety related jobs are also very good and far less backbreaking than being a roughneck. They require various certifications (I don't know the specifics), but can be done without a college degree in many instances. Tons of support companies do work too. Water hauling. Rig moves. Etc. those might require a CDL and that's it.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/15 01:52 AM
116

Someone awhile back wrote a great post about how everyone should fuck an escort at least once because it clearly shows the price of pussy (in terms of time, effort and money). It can help put things into perspective if a girl is making you put too much work into it or trying to get herself onto a pedestal.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/15 09:23 PM
52

I work for a mid-major independent producer. The oil industry can be great, but it is subject to major swings. Right now most drillers are laying people off because the price of oil is very low and fewer wells are bing drilled. If you can get in on an upswing and save prudently, you can make enough that riding a downswing won't be a major financial burden in the event you are laid off. Just be aware that now is a bad time to look to get in the industry, at least in the US.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/15 09:20 PM
72

"You fucking shitlord! She only hit him because the oppressive patriarchy has raped her mind and forcibly inseminated it with violence! She's the real victim in all of this, and how dare you try to shame and blame the victim. I hope her boyfriend ends up in jail for making her do this to him."
/r/TheRedPill19/02/15 03:18 PM
13

One of my good friends in high school and college was a good looking guy and largely a natural alpha and plate spinner until about his senior year of college. He fell for some girl (decent looking, but not great) who was just an awful person, and suddenly this guy turned totally Blue Pill. His entire group of friends, male and female, didn't like this girl. We dropped some subtle hints about her, but no one (including me) ever had a balls out conversation about what a horrible person she was. Wh…
/r/TheRedPill19/02/15 04:53 AM
2

Didn't you read? He said he's "ethnic," just like all the other people born in Ethnia.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/15 10:00 PM
3

I'm married to a female lawyer. I am a lawyer myself. I find my wife to be more rational than most people I deal with and certainly more than 99% of the women I deal with. She is a great mom and doesn't let her decisions get clouded by emotions. She understands consequences. I'd suggest getting a good prenup. Beyond that, as long as she is a good earner on her own, she makes a far safer wife than some ditz with no job skills. As you know, the court in a divorce will take into account her ability…
/r/TheRedPill17/02/15 11:45 PM
2

I've recently started flowing. I hate massages but wanted an activity that was relaxing. For me, floating fit the bill. It's a lot like being in that state you are in right before you fall asleep where your mind is kind of puttering some shit and you have those weird connective thoughts. An hour goes by insanely quick, but I feel incredibly relaxed afterwards. I float in the evening now because if I go early in the day I'm too relaxed to really get shit done for the rest of the day. I've thoroug…
/r/TheRedPill17/02/15 07:15 PM
86

And that doesn't even factor in physical characteristics (height, muscular, good looking, etc).
/r/TheRedPill15/02/15 04:43 AM
3

Recall a post on here a couple days ago on the main thing you have to offer women (that they want but cannot easily obtain) is commitment. The main thing women have to offer you is sex. Don't give out your commitment to her before she gives you the sex, which is what you are doing by taking her on repeated sexless dates. Don't reach out again. If she reaches out to you, tell her you can't do anything with her because you have another date that night (or just vaguely say you're meeting up with so…
/r/TheRedPill13/02/15 09:54 PM
2

That's not really correct in the defamation context. This is taking place in British Columbia. Here is Rule 12-6 for British Columbia, dealing specifically with jury trials. http://bclaws.ca/civix/document/LOC/complete/statreg/--%20C%20--/Court%20Rules%20Act%20[RSBC%201996]%20c.%2080/05_Regulations/17_168_2009%20-%20Supreme%20Court%20Civil%20Rules/168_2009_02.xml#rule12-6 To summarize: -The default rule, stated in subrule (1), is that trials are generally to a judge, not a jury. BUT, that rule i…
/r/TheRedPill13/02/15 09:25 PM
9

Doesn't matter. Canadian provinces allow jury trials in defamation cases. Check out p.134 of this article. http://www.blg.com/en/NewsAndPublications/Documents/publication_1528.pdf As stated in that article, the court rules in British Columbia normally allow juries to be waived, but that exception doesn't apply in a defamation case.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/15 08:51 PM
7

The downside of this is if he loses, it validates her claims. Don't assume that the truth will set him free; this isnt hollywood.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/15 08:44 PM
69

Trapped and used by some prior sexual encounter with him or some other man. Or confused/traumatized because she was raped by someone similar to this man. Don't underestimate the hamster, and remember there will be other hamsters on the jury.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/15 08:09 PM
8

I'm a licensed attorney in Oklahoma and Texas. In both of those states, either party would have the right to request a jury trial.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/15 08:06 PM
217

He won't get shit from her. She will get on the stand and cry, saying how she felt trapped and used. And the jury will forgive her.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/15 04:55 PM
1

If abundance mentality holds true though, then this isn't really going to be the case.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/15 02:04 AM
26

The problem with collusion in this type of circumstance is that everyone has incentive to cheat, and there is not enforcement mechanism to really prevent/punish this cheating. Everyone thinks that the rest of the group will make the sacrifice while they themselves can swoop in for the hottie that all the other guys are colluding against. So suddenly you don't even have "fair competition," but rather duplicitous action with men who were all in agreement to work together but are actually working a…
/r/TheRedPill10/02/15 10:56 PM
3

That's a lot of analysis about his life with little factual evidence to back up much of it.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/15 05:11 AM
59

This seems like an over-dramatic reaction to something that is pretty clearly meant to be taken in jest, especially when shown in the context of the rest of the commercial (and a comedic play on words to the well known, "Congratulations...it's a boy"). It's not very funny, but that doesn't mean it isn't a joke. I mean this with due respect: We aren't feminists and we don't need to acting so butthurt while looking for perceived slights. There are actual issues with erosions of masculinity and men…
/r/TheRedPill05/02/15 03:04 AM
1

You fail to mention whether or not they were married. Not sure about Canada, but in the US that would be a pretty fucking important detail.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/15 10:43 PM
39

The difference, as TRP knows, is that men actually demonstrate status by fucking hot women. It's preselection. The reverse is not true. Men don't have a preselection mechanism that assigns a higher sexual value to women based on the attractiveness of other men those women have fucked. Men evaluate the woman based on her appearance, not on the appearance of her other partners.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/15 08:19 PM
24

This pretty much told me what I needed to know: Matt asked me to marry him not long after my mother’s death. I had pressured him to propose while she was still alive, but with her gone, the ring stayed in my jewelry box. Everything I thought I knew about my life had changed. Sometimes I think about an alternate universe in which I marry the guy I met at 25 and have children in my early 30s. But what I realized in the wake of my mother’s death was that my sense of what the right relationship for …
/r/TheRedPill04/02/15 03:14 AM
68

Cue the thread 7 or 8 years from now on one of the relationship subreddits. "Help Reddit!!! I am relatively inexperienced and just found out my fiancé has fucked over 259 guys! She told me she had only slept with 3 men prior to me. What do?"
/r/TheRedPill04/02/15 02:06 AM
54

If someone hasn't backed up the sidebar materials that are hosted on reddit, it might be a good idea to do so.
/r/TheRedPill03/02/15 10:29 PM
54

More importantly: why in the fuck is there a tampon commercial on during the Super Bowl? Seriously, as it stand now, the ratio of beer commercials to tampon commercials stands 1:1.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 01:51 AM
3

In a way, when a woman is seduced by a ‘fake-alpha’ and later discovers this, she experiences the same psychological effects, albeit not nearly as intensely, as a woman who is physically raped. GAG. So, for all the women out there who chased down a BB and occasionally fuck them while pretending to actually enjoy the BB's cock, is that similar to rape of that man? She's doing the same thing you are accusing a "fake Alpha" of doing.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 07:27 PM
9

28, attractive, and never had a boyfriend? Congrats, you've found an untamed CC rider who is nearing the wall and looking to lock down a BB. Other gems you can expect to hear are "I've never really gone out with guys like you," and "I'm past my wild phase and looking to settle down with a nice guy." I'm also assuming that she is expecting you to cover most of the expenses of a Peruvian visit for her. She's already testing out your worth to her as a BB.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 04:51 PM
8

I wonder how 2XC would explain this one? Probably with theories about an oppressive patriarchy, how she was raped through deceit, and how the real Martin was in the wrong for abandoning his family and should therefore rightly have to be responsible for the cuckold offspring.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 03:17 PM
27

Fortunately, this shit won't fly in the US criminal justice system. The US Constitution (Fifth Amendment) provides that a person in a criminal trial you cannot be compelled to testify against yourself. Being required to prove your innocence would go directly against that; it would force you to put on a defense where you speak, and subject you to cross examination where you could be forced to incriminate yourself under oath. The presumption of innocence (as opposed to being required to prove your…
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 06:26 AM
3

She already has a hypergamic incentive to leave. OP is already giving another person potential control of his biological offspring. There is already an inherent risk in mating with this woman, just as there is with any woman. Anything outside of plating someone has risk. OP clearly has some risk tolerance given his current situation. My proposal gives incentive for her to fulfill a motherhood role, which OP expressed is important. Not providing at least some semblance of financial security for h…
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 05:13 AM
5

Here is my thought process: TRP recognizes the idea that traditional gender roles are important, and that it can be very beneficial for children if the woman is a stay-at-home mom. However, as this is 2015, it's essential we recognize that many (arguably most) women would enter the workforce were it not for either (1) a husband that provides for them, and/or (2) the need to stay at home. Because, in this case, OP is asking his girlfriend to stay at home, she is going to be excluded from the work…
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 03:46 AM
8

Lawyer here. Find a lawyer to draft you a Financial Support Agreement. Have it outline that, in the event you breakup, you will pay her $X each month for Y months/years. It's like an upfront negotiated version of alimony.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/15 10:47 PM
2

My questions is why do people keep visiting those female sites. At least some of it is the same women who keep buying issues of Cosmo to learn sex tips and how to keep a man. Many hope to learn shortcuts to gaining emotional fidelity from a man that don't require any real sacrifice or work on their own part.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/15 08:30 PM
3

Also remember: this shit is chess, not checkers. It takes some time to learn how to play and build a winning strategy.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/15 05:58 AM
1

Eat more protein and fat, and less carbs in your diet. /r/keto. Start lifting. Improve your game (READ!).
/r/TheRedPill29/01/15 05:45 AM
30

It's typical of the way anyone opposed to any other group or movement seeks to discredit and ultimately destroy it: (1) point to the most extreme members of a group and claim their views represent those of all group members, (2) take portions of the group's philosophies and extend those portions to the most absurd conclusions possible, (3) try to affiliate the ideals of the group with other "bad" groups, such as nazis and racists, and (4) make no mention of any positive aspects of the group's ac…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/15 12:16 AM
7

I see the term "trigger" thrown around in a lot of posts, especially in headings on various relationship subs. What is meant by that term?
/r/TheRedPill27/01/15 11:12 PM
49

The original post that his update connects to mentions that she made him wait 2 months before having sex with him. Let that sink in: She willingly fucked other men for money on the first date, but wouldn't have sex with a man she professes to love until 2 months in. What a catch!
/r/TheRedPill27/01/15 08:57 PM
3

Fuck it. The fact you're actually motivated to better yourself and implementing a plan of action puts you far ahead of about 3/4 of men. I did Stronglifts for a while. Stick with it and your strength will definitely go up and (especially given your size) you will see some good muscle development. Seriously, take a couple of selfies in a mirror with your shirt off and pants off (keep on boxers... SL won't grow your cock). Do the same thing again in 90 days and compare them. The difference will be…
/r/TheRedPill27/01/15 06:08 AM
22

Wouldn't work. Young women still pre-wall can't possibly foresee the day when they won't be young and desirable, even if the evidence is laid bare in front of them.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/15 03:25 AM
144

More proof that women get their validation and sense of accomplishment from the men they fuck. If her ex's team wins the Super Bowl, you can bet that in her mind that she will always be imagining that there is a championship ring on her own finger.
/r/TheRedPill26/01/15 02:39 PM
55

All women can join. Awesome. Hope it fills up with those 260 lb 5'6" BBWs that are looking for a "REAL MAN".
/r/TheRedPill22/01/15 11:06 PM
42

She's trying to weed out the men who are pussies.
/r/TheRedPill22/01/15 11:00 PM
1

Wtf? Did he set it up for her, or just wait outside to confront her afterwards?
/r/TheRedPill22/01/15 03:02 AM
2

mein neger When I read this I visualized an overjoyed Hitler slapping Rommel on the back and saying it as they stroll through Poland.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/15 07:51 PM
2

Am I the only one who doesn't know what the phrase "her own Kovie Biakolo" means?
/r/TheRedPill21/01/15 02:44 PM
82

Why would I take advice about women from a man who has taken a vow of celibacy?
/r/TheRedPill19/01/15 04:10 AM
11

They would probably argue that it's abusive and exploitative for men to hire surrogates for their own desires, much like they argue with regard to men hiring prostitutes.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/15 06:57 PM
86

I am a lawyer. Arkansas has a very similar law. A man can procure an egg (at a fertility clinic), have it fertilized with his own sperm, and then have the resulting embryo implanted in a female surrogate for gestation. The resulting child belongs 100% to the man, with neither the egg donor nor surrogate "mother" having any claim to the child. Check out Ark. Code 9-10-201(b)(2) (regarding if the surrogate mother is married) and 9-10-201(c)(1)(B) (regarding if the surrogate mother is unmarried). I…
/r/TheRedPill17/01/15 04:53 PM
3

Dread game. It's in the sidebar. Basically create the fear of dread in her because you are an improved man with high SMV and therefore could walk on her at any time and find a better woman than her. Light dread refers to things like what you did by going on the run (showing her you can leave the situation and thereby implicitly indicating you can find something more appealing than her and her bullshit), as opposed to a heavier dread, which would be something like calling up another woman on the …
/r/TheRedPill15/01/15 09:08 PM
8

Not any more paranoid than all the guys on here worried about false rape claims. Being accused of being a kid toucher is one of those things that forever and irreparably destroys your life, at least in the US.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/15 03:05 PM
42

What protocols exist to ensure that some crazy kid (or that kid's crazy mom) doesn't falsely accuse me of inappropriately touching them? I think BBBS is a great program. But the worry over these kinds of allegations has always been my biggest fear of getting involved in this kind of thing. It just seems like unnecessary risk for not much reward.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/15 08:40 PM
3

Yes, you are too paranoid. Also, she went to law school. This means that she will likely be more capable of engaging in rational, non-emotional thinking than 99% of women you will meet. Might make a very good plate, or even a good LTR depending on her other qualities and what you are after. Find out what she prosecutes. Most are assigned to a specific category of crimes (e.g., domestic violence, gang crimes, vice, small misdemeanor, property crime, etc...). If you really have concern, this can h…
/r/TheRedPill09/01/15 07:08 AM
4

34 year old. Lost my hair a while back. Just shave it all. It's hard letting go (believe me, I know), but the smooth scalp look quickly becomes the new you. Eventually, people see old pictures of you and had totally forgotten what you looked like with hair. And most girls don't dock points for being totally smooth on top.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/15 04:22 AM
3

My theory: Emo is shorthand slang for "emotional hardcore". Start with that and it's not hard to see why this subculture would be popular with women. Emo music and culture presents itself as being very deep and dark. For many young women, that brooding cute guy that has all this emotional turmoil in his life is a very attractive figure. "He's so mysterious!" They participate in that culture (through emulating the dress and listening to the music) because it makes it seem like it will be more lik…
/r/TheRedPill09/01/15 03:49 AM
3

There is always one sorority on every campus that is known as the sorority for fat/ugly girls. There is also usually a band sorority that has less than desirable women. Yes, you can still date sorority girls even if you aren't greek. You just have to have a high SMV that is independent of greek status; you don't get the "SMV bonus points" that are automatically conferred upon you by being in a good fraternity.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/15 03:44 AM
1

One other thought, OP. A few states (Arkansas being one of them, and maybe also California) allow a single man to hire a surrogate mother. The child that is born is recognized to belong to the man only, not to the woman who birthed the child. Look up Arkansas Act 647. It's in section 1(c)(1). This would make you the sole parent of the child. No child support payment responsibilities. No meddlesome woman interfering. But you would be 100% responsible for raising and supporting the child on your o…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/15 08:31 PM
2

I think I get what OP is asking. I'm just pointing out the risks of it. At least with marriage (assuming you choose a good wife), you get someone who has a vested interest in your success and well being. She wants you to both financially and emotionally support her. Fucking you over too hard will prevent that. But as just a baby daddy, your woman doesn't have those motivations. You are just seen by her as some mistake in her past that fucks with the lives of her children, screws up her romantic …
/r/TheRedPill08/01/15 07:53 PM
3

Child support can be calculated and worst case scenario it is cheaper long term than by having a baby with a wife Child support can (and frequently) are modified by courts. Your baby mama can request increases as often as she likes. Even if she doesn't get them, you still have to pay to defend yourself against those requests. And it is generally much more expensive for you to defend it than for her to ask for it, so from her perspective it's a very cheap way to get more money from you or inflict…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/15 07:41 PM
1

Is this serious? It's a terrible idea: 1) the court system favors women here (US). You, at most, will get every other weekend with your kids. 2) the woman you knock up has you by the balls for child support payments. Those are often totally unrelated to how much it actually costs to raise kids, and you have no say in how those funds are spent. 3) she may marry a BB who will then be raising your kids. You won't be seen as their father in the kids' eyes because they will only see you a couple of d…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/15 07:35 PM
0

TRP is about men improving themselves. There are discussions on here with some regularity regarding applying TRP principles for gay and bisexual men. It is not just for heterosexuals. In short though, I don't think TRP really "takes a stance" on these issues. TRP members are generally anti-marriage (all marriages), so there isn't going to be much of a stance on issues like gay marriage. TRP members also universally seem to be against rape, but most are vigilant in discussing how ideas like "rape…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/15 01:59 AM
8

Not sure about a female version of the red pill, but my understanding of AWALT is that it is a useful construct for deteiming how females will behave and how to behave when dealing with them. Obviously, not every woman is exactly the same. There are some butch lesbians that are pretty red pill. There are some women with psychological issues that can't have emotions. There are asexual women without the hormones that make them desire alpha cock. These are extreme examples, but they are also outlie…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/15 01:08 AM
144

And now she will be able to claim she solved a problem that didn't exist. Way to go, feminism!
/r/TheRedPill08/01/15 01:01 AM
2

To clarify, some Aussie woman had her husband leave her. Prior to him leaving, she and husband booked a trip. She is now auctioning off her husband's ticket for that trip, and the winner will be her travel companion. She says there will be no sex with the winner.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/15 11:47 PM
20

Excellent FR. Always nice to get the perspective of someone in an LTR on frame and power balance. It's entirely different than with plate spinning. How long has your transformation to this point taken?
/r/TheRedPill07/01/15 09:19 PM
1

It's odd that things like the 180 plan are frequently mentioned on DB and other relationship subs. People tend to be very supportive of the 180 plan, which is chock full of redpill concepts. Yet mentioning the redpill itself with that same post would immediately cause the advice to be shunned. Too many people on those subs are caught up and labels and can't think outside of what they deem as offensive words.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/15 05:15 PM
2

If her name is on the deed, regardless of whether or not you are named on the deed too, be very careful about changing the locks. As an owner (name on deed), she is legally entitled to enter the premises. You can end up in a fair amount of trouble for preventing her from entering her own property.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/15 05:09 PM
2

Yup. My wife will get emotional about stuff, and then (usually) fairly quickly realize her emotions are running her thoughts. After that moment of clarity it's pretty easy to have a rational conversation about whatever is going on. I think women who make good wives share a trait similar to this.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/15 12:54 AM
8

Thanks. I'm actually an attorney. So is my wife. I'm aware of the ups and downs of prenups.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 10:09 PM
2

See my reply to the other comment.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 08:24 PM
27

Allow me to elaborate: I asked my wife for a prenup. My wife is rational. She also has a career and had some premarital assets, just like I did. She was interested in protecting those assets, which were comparable in amount to mine. We got past the whole "don't you trust me" bullshit by having a conversation about what was fair and why it wouldn't matter if she trusted the marriage like she said she did (meaning she didn't think it would end in divorce). In the end, she was receptive to it and a…
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 08:23 PM
1

The fact he called browsing the Internet his "reddit career" pretty much invalidates anything he says regarding the topic of being a man.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 07:28 PM
88

Any girl who won't sign a prenup is a girl you should not marry. Period. Yes, I am married. Yes, we have a prenup.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 07:24 PM
5

I love resolutioners. They only show up for the first few weeks, but pay for the whole year. Keeps my costs down.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 05:17 PM
1

Sorry to hear about your daughter. Sometimes being a man means having to do the shit that needs done to take care of family. You're doing a good thing and handling shit the way it needs to be handled in the process. Don't let anyone ever tell you otherwise.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/15 10:05 PM
2

Any time-stamp on the testing and hamstering? I don't want to spend 35 minutes watching some junkie shoot up and bitch about her problems.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/15 03:40 PM
2

Exactly. For all the shit people like to give cops, they are vastly more skilled at interrogations than most citizens. They've sat at the interrogation table a lot more than you. Cops are better at extracting information to make you look guilty than you are at providing information to make yourself look innocent. If you are arrested, demand your lawyer and then shut the fuck up. You will not talk yourself out of the situation. You will not outsmart the cops. You will just fuck up and make yourse…
/r/TheRedPill29/12/14 10:17 PM
1

There's lots of lazy people in any volunteer organization. Pay them no mind. They just get in the way.
/r/TheRedPill23/12/14 02:40 AM
3

Habitat for Humanity is an org that does this. They have chapters almost everywhere.
/r/TheRedPill21/12/14 03:15 PM
16

Just trying to spread the message without some of the lingo. It's funny actually. Had I said the word "hamstering" or "hypergamy" in that post, I would have been downvoted into oblivion and been told to take that "redpill shit" elsewhere. But when I explain the concepts that these words are simply shortcuts for, it becomes to top post in the thread.
/r/TheRedPill21/12/14 03:08 PM
2

I am a Freemason. You do not have to be "invited," at least as you think of it. That is a common myth. You have to ask a mason to join. That mason will then take your request to his lodge and you will be invited after that to begin your training to progress through the first three degrees. You are not a full mason until the 3rd degree (master).
/r/TheRedPill20/12/14 04:15 AM
3

Identical thread was posted in relationships and subsequently deleted.
/r/TheRedPill19/12/14 08:29 PM
1

At 23-24, most US women will be done with a 4-year undergrad program. They are entering the "real world," away from easy access to athletes and frats, right as they hit their peak SMV. There is no real difference in SMV between a female 21 year old college junior and a female 24 year old college grad.
/r/TheRedPill19/12/14 04:22 PM
2

As I recall, she has a vagina. You do not. All the more reason to avoid doing this. You don't get a pussy pass like she will.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/14 11:55 PM
23

I was with you on a lot of this up until you suggested stealing her identity and opening a credit card. It's a stupid risk from a legal perspective.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/14 11:50 PM
11

So now that she's a single mommy, she really wants that BB to pay for it. Her plan was faulty in not keeping that nice guy in orbit so he could swoop in to rescue her after she got pumped and dumped and left with a kid. Worst part is that not only will she probably find her BB since she still has some of her looks, but he will be oblivious to her still wanting (and possibly getting) some AF side action.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/14 12:21 PM
4

I use these "phases" to improve my mastery over things and reach a goal. For example, I did the typical 30ish year old thing and wanted to push my ass to run a half marathon. I hadn't run in ages and was out of shape. So I spent several months with a running club, reading about best diet and training, and putting in miles. It was a phase, and I definitely had a niche during that time, but its purpose was to help me fulfill a goal that I had set for myself. After I ran it, I ticked that off my to…
/r/TheRedPill16/12/14 10:40 PM
4

Punk. Lots of punk. Older hardcore stuff (Agnostic Front, Minor Threat) to more modernist stuff (Nofx, Bad Religion, Offspring).
/r/TheRedPill16/12/14 12:48 AM
2

Also, a lot of "hick" farmers are very, very wealthy. Many have several generations of family wealth to tap. And in places where there is oil, they usually get fat royalty checks.
/r/TheRedPill10/12/14 05:22 PM
16

She thought that because free milk was so popular that she'd be able to easily sell the cow. That is a damn good metaphor.
/r/TheRedPill10/12/14 05:04 PM
3

Getting them young may be best. It seems almost inevitable that the longer they are single, the more partners they will have and the more likely they will be to take a spin on the CC.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/14 04:18 PM
2

34 year old male. Married 9 years. 2 year old daughter. Wife has very low partner count. We are both attorneys. Happy to answer anything.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/14 03:43 PM
1

For those who actually would like to read the court opinion - rather than a blogger/journalist's take on the opinion - here is the appellate court's ruling: http://sc.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/6/2010/2010-ohio-6216.pdf For those who aren't familiar with reading court opinions, they are generally structured so that they explain background facts, set for the law on the matter, and then apply the facts to that law. This one is no different, and is actually pretty readable. I dislike the law, but the co…
/r/MensRights06/01/11 04:53 AM
3

Lawyer here. The problem with child support payments in most states is that they have little to do with if the mother needs them, and everything to do with the support and well-being of the children. Child support is not alimony, and the criteria for awarding payments is different. Even if the child is taken from the mom, your friend may be the one who they look to for raising the child. Even if the child goes to live with relatives or another guardian, the child support payments probably still …
/r/MensRights30/12/10 04:11 AM
14

Your comment might make a sense had virtually all the articles on that site not linked to outside sources.
/r/MensRights21/11/10 12:37 AM
–

OP, I'm warning you as an attorney: Irrevocable trusts are incredibly powerful tool and, like any powerful tool, if you don't fully understand how to use it you can really get fucked over. A few years back, if someone had said "make the trustee someone you trust," (not trying to crap on you /u/Overkillengine, your advice is generally right, but it's the though process that OP needs to put into who he trusts in this scenario that I'm worried about) your thought probably would have been your wife.…
/r/TheRedPill
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter